Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2007;49:1215-1216
Published online before print April 2, 2007, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089060
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
49/6/1215    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.089060v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by White, W. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by White, W. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

(Hypertension. 2007;49:1215.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

The Riskiest Time for the Brain

Could the Nighttime Be the Right Time for Intervention?

William B. White

From the Division of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, The Pat and Jim Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington.

Correspondence to William B. White, Division of Hypertension and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030–3940. E-mail wwhite@nso1. uchc.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The natural circadian rhythm of blood pressure (BP) typically includes a nocturnal decrease of 10% to 20% in BP compared with daytime, awake values.1,2 However, in as many as 25% to 35% of hypertensive patients, there is a moderate-to-marked loss of this decline in nocturnal BP, a phenomenon that has been associated with excessive cardiac,3 renal,4 and cerebrovascular5 target organ damage. In addition, patients with hypertension who exhibit a nocturnal BP increase compared with daytime BP (so-called "risers") have the worst prognosis for future stroke and cardiac events.6 In contrast, there is also some evidence that patients with marked nocturnal BP declines (so-called "extreme dippers") are at greater risk for ischemic strokes and silent myocardial ischemia than patients whose decline in BP during sleep is normal.7

Both the etiologies and the consequences of an elevated nocturnal BP are diverse. Since Shimada et al8 first reported a study evaluating ambulatory BP monitoring in older patients with hypertension using MRI 15 years ago, there has been an ongoing issue with our general understanding of BP variability and the brain as a target organ, because most studies have had small sample sizes and have been performed in homogenous populations. In this issue of Hypertension, Schwartz et al9 have provided us with a large cross-sectional study from Minnesota and Mississippi of 263 black and 343 white subjects who underwent clinic and ambulatory monitoring of the BP and MRI of the brain to assess the relations among the various BP measures and white matter . . . [Full Text of this Article]