Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;52:460-461
Published online before print August 11, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117226
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/3/460    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117226v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sica, D. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2008;52:460.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Endothelin Receptor Antagonism

What Does the Future Hold?

Domenic A. Sica

From the Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond.

Correspondence to Domenic A. Sica, Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology, Chairman, Clinical Pharmacology and Hypertension, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA 23298-0160. E-mail dsica@mcvh-vcu.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The endothelins are a family (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3) of naturally occurring polypeptides, with ET-1 being the most clinically pertinent isoform. ET-1 was formally identified in 1988, at which time it was viewed mainly as a potent vasoconstrictor; however, the biological understanding of endothelin has since rapidly evolved, and it is now appreciated that ET-1 is not only a potent vasoconstrictor but also that it has a prominent role in fibrogenesis, inflammatory states, oxidative stress, atherosclerosis, salt and water balance, and pulmonary artery hypertension.1–3

ET-1 binds to 2 receptors: ETA and ETB. In general, stimulation of these receptors has opposing actions. For example, ETA stimulation is vasoconstricting, as well as being profibrotic and proinflammatory, whereas ETB stimulation is vasodilatory, antiproliferative, and natriuretic. The ETB receptor also subserves a clearance role for ET-1. The varying distribution of the endothelin receptors in different tissues is responsible for the mixture of actions attributed to endothelin. For example, the renal medulla contains the highest concentration of endothelin receptors in the body.4 The renal cortex is also heavily populated with endothelin receptors (50% of the density of the medulla). The ETB receptor predominates in the kidney, composing 70% of the receptors in both locations. Thus, the important roles of ET-1 and the ETB receptor are in regulating renal hemodynamics and tubular transport processes, as well as mesangial and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and mitogenesis.3

Likewise, ETA and ETB receptors are highly expressed in smooth muscle cells and foamy macrophages in atherosclerotic models. Stimulation . . . [Full Text of this Article]