Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;52:608-609
Published online before print August 11, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117473
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/4/608    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.117473v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N. M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Clinical Trials
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Studies

(Hypertension. 2008;52:608.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Recent Clinical Trials

The Good, the Bad, and the Misleading

Norman M. Kaplan

From the Division of Hypertension, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas.

Correspondence to Norman M. Kaplan, Division of Hypertension, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8586. E-mail norman.kaplan@utsouthwestern.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Results of 3 major clinical trials on the treatment of hypertension have been published recently1,2 or presented.3 In addition, the validity of data provided in an often-quoted publication of another trial4 that had a major impact on nephrological practice5 has been seriously questioned.6

First, the good trial, Treatment of Hypertension in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older,1 addressed a major unsettled issue: should antihypertensive drug therapy be given to the very elderly? The need for such a study is obvious, because people >80 years of age are the fastest growing part of our population, and systolic hypertension is almost invariable among them.7 The few data available previously on the benefit versus danger of treating them were not encouraging.8

Fortunately, Treatment of Hypertension in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older turned out very well, so well that it was stopped prematurely after an average of 1.8 years of treatment because of the strong evidence of benefit with an average blood pressure that was 15/6 mm Hg lower than in the placebo group. Death from cardiovascular disease was reduced by 23%, death from any cause by 21%, stroke by 30%, and heart failure by 64%. As with all trials, some methodologic issues are noted: (1) the subjects were healthier than most people over age 80 years; (2) only one third had isolated systolic hypertension, the usual form of hypertension in the elderly; (3) only half reached the goal of 150/80 mm Hg; and (4) therapy was limited to the diuretic . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. Griffin and A. K. Bidani
Uncritical Acceptance of Combination Treatment of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Nondiabetic Renal Disease Trial Results
Hypertension, January 1, 2009; 53(1): e3 - e3.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. M. Kaplan
Response to Uncritical Acceptance of Combination Treatment of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor in Nondiabetic Renal Disease Trial Results
Hypertension, January 1, 2009; 53(1): e4 - e4.
[Full Text] [PDF]