Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2009;54:951-953
Published online before print September 14, 2009, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.135061
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/5/951    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.135061v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, N. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other Treatment

(Hypertension. 2009;54:951.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

The Choice of Thiazide Diuretics

Why Chlorthalidone May Replace Hydrochlorothiazide

Norman M. Kaplan

From the Hypertension Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Tex.

Correspondence to Norman M. Kaplan, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8586. E-mail Norman.kaplan@utsouthwestern.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
Thiazide diuretics were introduced in the United States for the treatment of hypertension in 1957. The first of these, chlorothiazide, was soon accompanied by a large number of other sulfonamide derivatives, including chlorthalidone. Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) rapidly became the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug in the United States, whereas bendroflumethiazide was most popular in the United Kingdom. The initial popularity of HCTZ in the United States was abetted by its use in the first controlled trial of the treatment of nonmalignant hypertension, the Veterans’ Affairs Cooperative Study.1 The starting dose of HCTZ was 50 mg/d, and it was used along with reserpine and hydralazine. A number of other trials published in the 1970s all used higher doses of diuretic, for example, ≥50 mg of HCTZ per day.2

For reasons unknown to me, chlorthalidone was chosen to be the diuretic in the first large controlled trial of the treatment of hypertension, the Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program.3 In the Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up Program, all 10 940 patients were started on chlorthalidone from 25 to 100 mg/d. Other drugs were added to achieve control of the blood pressure. In addition, half were assigned to "referred" care and the other half to more closely monitored and intensively treated "stepped" care. The stepped care–treated half achieved a 4.4% further reduction in diastolic blood pressure and a 17.0% reduction in mortality.

In other large, placebo controlled trials published in the early 1980s, other diuretics were used: chlorothiazide in the Australian trial,4 HCTZ in the Oslo . . . [Full Text of this Article]