Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2009;54:954-955
Published online before print August 31, 2009, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138545
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
54/5/954    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.138545v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glasser, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lackland, D. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glasser, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lackland, D. T.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Epidemiology

(Hypertension. 2009;54:954.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Does Prehypertension Represent an Increased Risk for Incident Hypertension and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome?

Stephen P. Glasser; Jan N. Basile; Daniel T. Lackland

From the Division of Preventive Medicine (S.P.G.), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans’ Affairs Medical Center (J.N.B.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, S.C.; Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina (D.T.L.), Charleston, S.C.

Correspondence to Stephen P. Glasser, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1717 11th Ave S MT 638, Birmingham, AL 35205. E-mail sglasser@uab.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Literature is accumulating that the presence of prehypertension (pre-HTN; defined as a blood pressure [BP] of 120 to 139 mm Hg systolic and/or 80 to 90 mm Hg diastolic) is associated with increased long-term risk. It remains controversial, however, as to whether prehypertensive BP alone or its association with its common risk factor accompaniments is important in determining ultimate risk. In the past, pre-HTN was called transient hypertension (HTN), borderline HTN, and high-normal BP. Although the terminology has changed, what is increasingly agreed on is that pre-HTN is frequently a precursor of HTN and is associated with an excess morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD). In the Framingham Heart Study, 50% of patients age ≥65 years with a BP of 130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg progressed to HTN within 4 years. In those same patients who had a BP of 120 to 129/80 to 84 mm Hg, 26% became hypertensive within 4 years.1 As observed in the Framingham Heart Study, BPs of 130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg impose twice the risk of CV disease compared with those whose BPs are <120/80 mm Hg.2 Perhaps if pre-HTN was eliminated, almost half of all heart attacks could be prevented. To emphasize the wide variation in risk among prehypertensives, Lee et al3 combined 3 cross-sectional studies conducted in Singapore (baseline years: 1982–1995), where 5830 subjects were grouped into normotensive, pre-HTN, or HTN cohorts. Follow-up (median: 12 years) was done by linkage to the National Death Register. Outcomes included . . . [Full Text of this Article]