Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 2008;52:211-212
Published online before print July 7, 2008, doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.115220
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
52/2/211    most recent
HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.115220v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weir, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weir, M. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dietary Supplements
*High Blood Pressure
*Kidney Diseases
Hazardous Substances DB
*PARATHYROID HORMONE
*VITAMIN D2
Related Collections
Right arrow Other hypertension
Right arrow Clinical Studies
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrow Other Research

(Hypertension. 2008;52:211.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial Commentaries

Is Activated Vitamin D Supplementation Renoprotective?

Matthew R. Weir

From the Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore.

Correspondence to Matthew R. Weir, Division of Nephrology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, 22 S Greene St, Rm N3W143, Baltimore, MD 21201. E-mail mweir@medicine.umaryland.edu


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

If activated vitamin D supplementation is renoprotective, is it because of suppression of the parathyroid hormone (PTH) or selective vitamin D receptor activation?

In the present issue of Hypertension, Alborzi et al1 present the results of a well-done prospective clinical trial to evaluate the effects of short-term (1-month) treatment with activated vitamin D (paricalcitol) on blood pressure, biomeasures of inflammation, endothelial function, and measures of urinary protein excretion. The results are fascinating. As others have noted previously,2 there is an unmistakable effect in reducing urinary protein excretion and also on C-reactive protein levels. Yet, intriguingly, there is no apparent effect on blood pressure, measured either in the office or with 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, nor was there an effect on renal hemodynamics, vascular function, or PTH levels.

The combination of persistently high PTH levels and low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels has been reported to be associated with bone loss, cardiovascular disease, immunosuppression, and increased mortality in patients with end-stage kidney disease.3,4 Recent studies in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or end-stage kidney disease have suggested that paricalcitol (a selective activator of the vitamin D receptor) is associated with improved mortality.5 The explanation for this potential benefit is elusive. Some have suggested that vitamin D receptor activation may mitigate the effects of arterial calcification and possibly even prevent or ameliorate factors leading to atherosclerosis.3 The later benefits may be related to suppression of inflammation, inhibition of bone loss, or possibly attenuation of the activity of the renin-angiotensin system and . . . [Full Text of this Article]