(Hypertension. 1995;25:570-580.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin-Buch, Germany (M.A.L., M. Böhm, J.B., M. Bader, D.G.); Department of Pharmacology, Osaka City (Japan) University Medical School (S.K.); and the Department of Anatomy I, University of Heidelberg (Germany) (S.B.).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: rats, transgenic renin-angiotensin system hypertension, experimental gene expression
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The transgenic rat line TGR(mREN-2)27 has been established by introducing the murine Ren-2 gene into the genome of the rat with the use of microinjection techniques.10 These rats are characterized by fulminant hypertension, with values of up to 230 mm Hg at 5 to 6 weeks of age despite low circulating renin. Whereas renin expression is suppressed in the kidney, the transgene is highly expressed in extrarenal tissues such as adrenal gland, brain, and thymus and the gastrointestinal and urogenital tracts.11 Thus, overexpression of renin in the kidney does not account for the phenotype. Since all transgenic founder animals were hypertensive irrespective of the site of insertion into the genome10 and since the presence of the transgene segregates with the hypertensive phenotype, an insertional mutagenesis seems unlikely. Therefore, it is hypothesized that hypertension results from enhanced local Ang II generation in extrarenal tissues. Although the additional renin gene is the only genetic difference compared with nontransgenic controls, the mechanisms underlying the development of hypertension are still elusive. In the adrenal gland, high Ren-2 expression is associated with increased urinary steroid excretion in young animals,12 and high circulating prorenin levels are, to a large extent, of adrenal origin.13 In addition, transgenic rats exhibit early morphological signs of pathological alterations within the cardiovascular system, including cardiac hypertrophy and glomerulosclerosis.14 15 Thus, this monogenetic model of hypertension offers the possibility of studying the mechanisms by which a single gene contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
The aim of this study was to investigate the regulation of renin and angiotensinogen gene expression in TGR(mREN-2)27 rats. Since expression of the renin gene in the kidney is subject to feedback inhibition by increased circulating Ang II and elevated blood pressure, we examined the modulation of gene expression in renal and extrarenal tissues of heterozygous transgenic rats after intervention with the CE inhibitor lisinopril compared with the direct vasodilator dihydralazine, focusing on the mechanisms involved in renin suppression in the kidney. In addition, we examined the influence of gene dose on renin and angiotensinogen gene expression and on tissue Ang II.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Protocol
Four groups of heterozygous male TGR(mREN-2)27 rats (9 weeks of
age) were treated either with lisinopril (Zeneca) in daily doses of 10,
2, and 0.5 mg/kg body wt (n=11 in each group) for 7 weeks or with
dihydralazine in a daily dose of 30 mg/kg body wt (n=8) for 6 weeks.
Age-matched heterozygous transgenic rats (n=11) as well as homozygous
(n=11) and SD (n=11) rats were kept under the same conditions without
treatment. The average nighttime water intake was determined over 4
days, and drugs were administered accordingly. Daytime water intake was
ad libitum. Systolic pressure was determined weekly in the morning with
the use of tail-cuff plethysmography. Blood samples were obtained every
fortnight by retro-orbital puncture during light short-term anesthesia
and transferred into chilled tubes containing 5% phenanthroline-EDTA
for measurement of renin, angiotensinogen, and Ang I or 1% heparin
sodium for measurement of CE activity. At the end of treatment, rats
were killed by decapitation. Tissues were removed, immediately frozen
in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Whole hearts were washed in
0.9% NaCl, blotted dry, and weighed. The ratio of cardiac mass and
body weight was determined as a parameter for cardiac hypertrophy.
Biochemical Measurements
Plasma concentrations of inactive and active renin were
determined according to Glorioso et al.16 Briefly, for
activation of inactive renin, 20 µL plasma was incubated with 40 µL
trypsin (400 U/mL, dissolved in TES buffer: 0.1 mol/L TES, 10 mmol/L
EDTA, 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin, 0.01% Neomycin, pH 7.2) on ice for
10 minutes. The reaction was stopped with 40 µL soybean trypsin
inhibitor (600 U/mL TES buffer). For determination of active renin, 20
µL plasma was dissolved in 80 µL TES buffer. Samples were then
incubated with renin substrate isolated from nephrectomized rat plasma
(final concentration, 80 mg/mL; 0.11% 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol, 1.15
mg/mL 8-OH-chinolin in TES buffer). The reaction was stopped with 0.1
mol/L Tris-acetate, pH 7.4, immediately before and 1 hour after
incubation at 37°C, and generated Ang I was measured by
radioimmunoassay.17 Prorenin was calculated by subtraction
of active renin concentration from total renin concentration. CE
activity was measured with a fluorometric assay using
carboxy-phenyl-alanyl-histidyl-leucine as substrate.18
Measurement of renal and adrenal Ang II contents was carried out as previously described.19 Briefly, pieces of kidneys and whole adrenals were boiled in distilled water for 5 minutes, homogenized in 0.05N HCl, and centrifuged. The supernatant was applied to a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge column, and the retained peptide was eluted with 80% methanol/0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography followed by radioimmunoassay.
Creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were determined by a colorimetric assay (Hitachi autoanalyzer).
RNase Protection Assays
Total RNA was isolated according to Auffray and
Rougeon.20 For RNase protection assays,
[32P]UTP-labeled cRNA probes were made from the following
plasmids using the riboprobe Gemini II Kit (Promega)10 21 :
pSLM, yielding a Ren-2specific 224-bp fragment plus 20 bp
of vector-encoded sequence; pRen412, yielding a rat reninspecific
295-bp fragment plus 31 bp; pRag0.3, yielding a rat
angiotensinogenspecific 300-bp fragment plus 40 bp; and pSKrbac,
yielding a rat ß-actinspecific 150-bp fragment plus 28 bp of
vector-encoded sequence. Transcription was carried out according to the
manufacturer's protocol using 50 µCi [32P]UTP (3000
Ci/mmol, Amersham) for labeling of renins and angiotensinogen and 24
µCi [32P]UTP plus 13 µmol/L unlabeled UTP for
ß-actin to reduce signal intensity. Total RNA samples were mixed in
30 µL hybridization buffer (final concentration, 80% mL formamide,
40 mmol/L
piperazine-N,N'-bis-2-ethanesulfonic acid,
400 mmol/L NaCl, and 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8.0) containing 200 000 cpm
Ren-2, rat renin or angiotensinogen cRNA, respectively, and
20 000 cpm ß-actin cRNA. The samples were denatured at 100°C and
allowed to hybridize overnight at 45°C. Digestion was carried out
with 300 µL RNase buffer (300 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 10 mmol/L
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4) containing 12 µg RNase A (Sigma Chemical Co) and
0.6 µg RNase T1 (Calbiochem) per sample at 37°C for 1 hour. After
incubation with 10 µL proteinase K (10 mg/mL) and 10 µL 10% sodium
dodecyl sulfate at 37°C for 30 minutes, protected fragments were
extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol and
ethanol-precipitated with 18 µg tRNA as carrier. The pellet was
dissolved in 8 µL of 100% formamide-dye mix, denatured, and run on a
5% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 mol/L urea. Protected fragments
were detected by autoradiography and quantified by scanning
densitometry. For quantitative analysis of mRNA content, the ratio
of the density of specific probe and ß-actin was used.
Morphology and Histochemistry
Three rats of each group treated with lisinopril and
dihydralazine as well as three heterozygous control rats were
anesthetized by an injection of pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg body wt
IP) and perfusion-fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde/phosphate-buffered
saline after cannulation of the abdominal aorta.14 Kidney
slices were either frozen in liquid nitrogencooled isopentane or
postfixed for subsequent paraffin embedding. For immunohistochemistry,
deparaffinized kidney sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal
antibody against purified rat kidney renin (gift of Dr E. Hackenthal,
Heidelberg, Germany) at a 1:10 000 dilution or with 1% nonimmune
rabbit serum and were visualized with a peroxidase-antiperoxidase
staining kit (Dako). For in situ hybridization, cryostat sections were
incubated with digoxigenin-UTPlabeled riboprobes derived from the
same plasmids that were used for RNase protection assays.
Detection was carried out with an alkaline phosphatasecoupled
anti-digoxigenin antibody and nitroblue tetrazolium/X-phosphate
(Boehringer). For double labeling of renin protein and mRNA, a mixture
of anti-renin and anti-digoxigenin antibody (dilution 1:200 and 1:500,
respectively) was used. Protein signal was detected by Texas red
fluorescence followed by phosphatase detection. Morphological
analysis was performed on periodic acidSchiffstained paraffin
sections. Renal damage was assessed by determining the percentage of
damaged glomeruli characterized by collapse as well as
glomerulosclerosis with three grades of intensity identified by hyaline
deposits and mesangial proliferation.22 For this purpose,
approximately 100 glomeruli on each of two coronal sections, one from
the right and one from the left kidney, were evaluated with a Polyvar
microscope with interference contrast optics (Reichert).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the
CRUNCH statistical software program. Results are
expressed as mean±SEM. Between-group differences were analyzed by
the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test. Values of
P<.05 were considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Plasma RAS
In transgenic rats treated with lisinopril, plasma active renin
increased after the first week of treatment with all three doses and
was 9-, 25-, and 23-fold elevated at 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg,
respectively, after 6 weeks, whereas prorenin levels were not affected
(Fig 2A and 2B). This was accompanied by a parallel
increase of Ang I in plasma, reaching 2.9-, 3.5-, and 6.3-fold higher
levels with 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg lisinopril, respectively, at the end
of treatment compared with untreated controls (Fig 2C). Lisinopril led
to an increase of plasma CE activity after 1 week of treatment in all
groups (control, 321.3±47.5; 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg lisinopril,
677.5±31.9, 569.7±26.9, and 535.0±38.9 nmol His-Leu/mL per minute,
respectively; P<.0005 for all groups; Fig 2D). Plasma
angiotensinogen levels gradually decreased in rats treated with 2 and
10 mg/kg lisinopril compared with control animals by 59% and 46%,
respectively, whereas no changes were observed in rats treated with the
lowest lisinopril dose (Fig 2E). In rats treated with dihydralazine,
plasma active renin and prorenin as well as CE activity were unchanged
compared with control rats (data not shown).
|
Homozygosity for the transgene was associated with higher blood pressure. Plasma active renin was suppressed to an extent similar to that seen in heterozygous animals, whereas prorenin elevation was significantly higher (Fig 3A through 3C). Plasma Ang I was not affected by doubling of the transgene dose and was equally decreased in heterozygous and homozygous rats (Fig 3D). Plasma CE activity was significantly reduced in homozygous rats compared with normotensive SD rats or heterozygous transgenic rats (Fig 3E).
|
Effects on the Kidney
Renin activity in the kidney increased significantly in a
dose-dependent manner, from 51.5±12.6 pmol Ang I/mL per hour in
untreated transgenic controls to 267.8±19.8, 440.56±49.28, and
496.3±44.4 pmol Ang I/mL per hour after treatment with 0.5, 2, and 10
mg/kg lisinopril, respectively (P<.005 for all groups). To
assess the relative contribution of renin mRNA from either the
endogenous gene or the transgene, we used RNase protection assays that
distinguish the two mRNA species based on the protected length of 295
bp for rat renin and 224 bp for mouse Ren-2, respectively.
Treatment of heterozygous rats with 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg lisinopril was
associated with a 2.4-, 3.3-, and 9-fold induction of Ren-2
mRNA, respectively, and a 9-, 28-, and 35-fold induction of the
endogenous rat renin mRNA, whereas no changes in renin gene expression
were observed with dihydralazine (Fig 4A and 4B). Both lisinopril and dihydralazine
treatments had no influence on renal angiotensinogen expression (Fig 4C). In contrast to the induction of plasma CE activity after
lisinopril administration, renal CE activity decreased from 1.75±0.14
nmol His-Leu/mg per minute in untreated transgenic controls to
1.23±0.01, 0.81±0.1, and 0.56±0.03 nmol His-Leu/mg per minute after
treatment with 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg lisinopril, respectively
(P<.005 for 0.5 and 2 mg/kg lisinopril, and
P<.0005 for 10 mg/kg lisinopril).
|
The comparison of heterozygous and homozygous rats revealed that doubling of gene dose was accompanied by a 13-fold increase of the mouse transgene mRNA in the kidney, whereas endogenous rat renin mRNA was suppressed in heterozygous and homozygous rats to a similar extent (Fig 4A and 4B). Interestingly, the presence of the transgene in heterozygous TGR(mREN-2)27 rats was associated with a significant decrease of renal angiotensinogen mRNA, which was more pronounced in homozygous rats compared with nontransgenic controls (Fig 4C). Renal CE activity was similar in SD and heterozygous rats (1.82±0.6 and 1.75±0.1 nmol His-Leu/mg per minute) but decreased in homozygous transgenic rats (1.29±0.12 nmol His-Leu/mg per minute, P<.05 versus SD rats).
Measurement of renal tissue Ang II content revealed markedly reduced levels in heterozygous transgenic rats compared with SD rats (422.7±29.7 versus 734.8±46.6 pg Ang II/g, P<.0005, Fig 5). Surprisingly, in homozygous rats, renal Ang II content did not differ from that of nontransgenic SD rats despite suppression of renin angiotensinogen and CE in the kidney. After CE inhibition, Ang II levels were reduced to 63% of the levels of untreated heterozygous controls, whereas in dihydralazine-treated rats, no changes in renal Ang II content occurred.
|
Immunohistochemical analysis of renal renin distribution after CE inhibition revealed a prominent increase of immunoreactive renin stored in the afferent arteriolar wall over considerable distances toward the branching points from interlobular arteries (Fig 6A). Antihypertensive treatment with dihydralazine did not significantly increase renin immunostaining compared with untreated control rats, in which only few juxtaglomerular apparatuses were labeled (Fig 6B and 6C). The immunohistochemical findings were confirmed by in situ hybridization that demonstrated a paucity of juxtaglomerular renin mRNA in untreated control rats, whereas increased staining in lisinopril-treated animals was accompanied by a renin mRNA signal that colocalized to the immunoreactive sites shown by double labeling of the same section (Fig 6D and 6E). For in situ hybridization, the probes were not able to discriminate between the two species, and the same results were obtained with either mouse or rat renin probes. Although renin mRNA expression was occasionally found in extra-arteriolar sites, the highest accumulations of signal were present within glomeruli of rats treated with a high dose of lisinopril. The enhancement of renin expression under CE inhibition was dose dependent and less pronounced with the two lower doses of 2 and 0.5 mg/kg lisinopril.
|
Effects on the Adrenal Gland
Mouse renin mRNA was increased in the adrenal gland only after
treatment with the highest lisinopril dose of 10 mg/kg
(P<.05), whereas it was not affected by dihydralazine (Fig 7A). Doubling of gene dose in homozygous animals was
associated with a fourfold increase of transgene mRNA compared with
untreated heterozygous rats. Transcripts of the endogenous rat renin
gene were not detectable with 50 µg total RNA.
|
Ang II measurements in the adrenal gland demonstrated a significant increase in transgenic rats. Although homozygosity was associated with an unproportionally higher transgene expression in the adrenal gland when compared with heterozygous animals, tissue Ang II levels were similar in homozygous and heterozygous rats compared with SD rats. Lisinopril treatment resulted in a reduction of Ang II in the adrenal gland.
Effects on the Heart
Ren-2 mRNA is also found in cardiac tissue, and
homozygosity is associated with doubling of its mRNA. Administration of
lisinopril or dihydralazine showed no effect on the expression of
Ren-2 or rat renin (Fig 8A and data not
shown). Interestingly, presence of the transgene showed opposing
effects on angiotensinogen mRNA in the heart. Whereas in heterozygous
rats angiotensinogen mRNA was significantly suppressed, it was markedly
increased in homozygous rats. Furthermore, angiotensinogen gene
expression was negatively influenced by CE inhibition and decreased by
44%, 38%, and 48% with 0.5, 2, and 10 mg/kg lisinopril,
respectively, whereas treatment with dihydralazine caused a 5.8-fold
increase of angiotensinogen mRNA (Fig 8B). This was positively
correlated with cardiac hypertrophy. Treatment with all lisinopril
doses significantly reduced ratios of heart weight to body weight,
whereas dihydralazine increased cardiac hypertrophy (Fig 8C). In
addition, an increased cardiac angiotensinogen gene expression in
homozygous rats was also accompanied by a higher cardiac mass
index.
|
Renin and Angiotensinogen Gene Expression in Other Extrarenal
Tissues
The thymus belongs to the tissues with the highest
Ren-2 expression in TGR(mREN-2)27 rats, and doubling of the
gene dose was associated with a threefold higher transgene expression.
Long-term treatment with lisinopril or dihydralazine had no influence
on Ren-2 expression (Fig 9A). As opposed to
mouse renin, endogenous rat renin mRNA was not detectable in SD
rats, untreated heterozygous or homozygous transgenic rats, or
dihydralazine-treated rats but was dose dependently induced after CE
inhibition (Fig 9B), suggesting a negative regulatory influence of Ang
II on the endogenous renin gene expression in the rat. Angiotensinogen
gene expression was not affected by either treatment, although in
untreated heterozygous animals, angiotensinogen mRNA was significantly
suppressed compared with SD or homozygous rats (Fig 9C).
|
Ren-2 transcripts were also present in testes of male transgenic rats and were strongly enhanced in homozygous rats carrying two copies of the transgene. An induction of transgene expression was observed in heterozygous rats after treatment with 10 mg/kg lisinopril but not with dihydralazine (Fig 10), whereas no changes in endogenous rat renin or angiotensinogen gene expression occurred (data not shown).
|
High expression of the transgene in the gastrointestinal tract was not affected by lisinopril or dihydralazine (Fig 11A). In contrast to this, endogenous rat renin gene expression was dose dependently induced in stomach by lisinopril but not by dihydralazine (Fig 11B). Angiotensinogen gene expression in stomach was not affected by gene dose or antihypertensive treatment (data not shown).
|
Morphological Analysis of Kidneys
Morphological studies revealed that CE inhibition led to a
reduction of structural damages in the kidney. Quantitative evaluation
of periodic acidSchiffstained paraffin sections of kidneys from
untreated transgenic rats demonstrated focal glomerulosis, mesangial
proliferation, widening of Bowman's space, and occasionally collapsed
glomeruli. After lisinopril treatment for 7 weeks, the histological
aspect was almost normalized. As shown in Table 1, only
60.9% of the total number of glomeruli were intact in the untreated
group, whereas with high-dose lisinopril, 82.6% of the glomeruli were
intact. The lower doses of lisinopril produced only minor morphological
changes compared with controls. Conversely, dihydralazine treatment did
not cause obvious changes in renal morphology when compared with
untreated controls. The improvement of renal damage observed with CE
inhibition was accompanied by a lack of progression of renal
dysfunction, as evidenced by constant levels of blood urea nitrogen and
plasma creatinine in lisinopril-treated rats, whereas in untreated
controls both parameters and in dihydralazine-treated rats blood urea
nitrogen were significantly increased (Table 2).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The present study demonstrates that expression of renin and angiotensinogen in the kidney and extrarenal tissues is differentially regulated under the influence of the transgene and in response to the administration of a CE inhibitor or a direct vasodilator. Since it is known that CE inhibition interferes with the negative feedback mechanism, leading to increased synthesis and release of renin via decreased levels of circulating Ang II,6 it was of particular interest to investigate the influence of CE inhibition on the renal RAS in TGR(mREN-2)27 rats. We therefore examined the effects on blood pressure and plasma and tissue RAS and demonstrated a high sensitivity of TGR(mREN-2)27 rats to CE inhibition. Although kinin-potentiating effects of CE inhibitors cannot be excluded, they seem not to be of major importance because angiotensin receptor blockade has also been shown to be effective in reducing blood pressure.23
Increased circulating active renin results from the induction of renal expression of both the endogenous renin gene and the transgene in response to CE inhibition and implies similar regulating mechanisms that are independent of blood pressure because dihydralazine did not affect renin expression despite its antihypertensive effect. The physiological role of prorenin is unknown, and whether activation in vivo occurs is controversial. In spontaneously hypertensive rats and monkeys, exogenously administered prorenin is not converted within the circulation but taken up by the kidney and converted to active renin without affecting blood pressure.24 25 As elevated prorenin in TGR(mREN-2)27 rats is to a large extent of mouse transgene origin,13 the lack of any effect of CE inhibition on plasma prorenin suggests that it is not subject to a negative feedback control by Ang II. Higher prorenin levels accompanied by a suppressed plasma RAS and high expression of extrarenal renin in homozygous TGR(mREN-2)27 rats correlate with higher blood pressure values, thus rendering prorenin a marker for tissue renin.
The presence of the transgene is associated with reduced renal angiotensinogen gene expression in TGR(mREN-2)27 rats that is more pronounced in homozygous rats. Renal CE activity is likewise suppressed, although only in homozygous rats. Consequently, tissue Ang II is significantly decreased in transgenic compared with SD rats. Interestingly, homozygous rats show renal Ang II levels similar to those in heterozygous rats despite greater suppression of angiotensinogen and CE. A pressure-independent mechanism by which Ang II inhibits renin release by a direct intrarenal action, also referred to as short feedback loop, has been demonstrated.26 Therefore, overexpression of the transgene in the kidney may be responsible for relatively high levels of Ang II in homozygous animals, which in turn mediate suppression of renin independently of the elevated blood pressure. In this context, decreased renal Ang II in heterozygous rats that do express the transgene in the kidney may still be inappropriately high given the suppression of the endogenous renin gene that is equally strong irrespective of gene dose. The notion that suppression of the endogenous renin gene in the kidney is not mediated by the increased blood pressure alone is supported by the finding that normotension induced by dihydralazine was not sufficient to abolish renal renin suppression.
As an arteriolar vasodilator, dihydralazine tends to cause reflex tachycardia, renin release,27 28 and fluid retention, counteracting its antihypertensive effect, yet it is still unclear whether this is due to increased sympathetic discharge evoked by arterial vasodilation or a direct renal mechanism.29 Dihydralazine treatment of transgenic rats did not affect renin release or body weight, suggesting an absence of significant volume retention.
Transgenic rats exhibit severe glomerulosclerosis with accompanying proteinuria.15 In the present study the decrease of renal Ang II induced by CE inhibition was accompanied by an improvement of renal function, as demonstrated by the maintenance of stable renal function parameters (Table 2). Since with dihydralazine renal function deteriorated, one may speculate that the effects of the CE inhibitor reflect the preservation of adequate renal function rather than control of hypertension by interfering with an abnormal regulation of the intrarenal RAS.7
As a prerequisite for an activated intra-adrenal RAS, we demonstrated increased local formation of Ang II in the adrenal gland of transgenic rats. The decline in adrenal Ang II content paralleled blood pressure reduction, suggesting effective tissue CE inhibition.
Overexpression of renin in the heart of TGR(mREN-2)27 rats may lead to increased Ang II formation despite decreased angiotensinogen mRNA found in heterozygous animals. Regression of cardiac hypertrophy after CE inhibition may thus result in part from the prevention of Ang IImediated muscular hypertrophy.30 Opposite effects of transgene dose on cardiac angiotensinogen gene expression may occur as a result of mechanisms counteracting or interfering with an activated RAS. Circulating Ang II has been implicated in the upregulation of renal angiotensinogen mRNA,31 and because plasma Ang II levels of transgenic rats are unchanged compared with those in nontransgenic controls,10 it seems likely that differential effects on angiotensinogen expression are under tissue-specific regulation. Because normotension was achieved with both substances, the effect on cardiac hypertrophy and the improvement of renal damage seen with specific inhibitors of the RAS but not with dihydralazine suggest that inhibition of tissue CE may have an important long-term effect on the improvement of cardiovascular damage in this model. Chronic lisinopril treatment leads to an induction of plasma CE, whereas tissue CE is effectively inhibited, further suggesting that circulating CE is not the only determinant for the long-term effects of chronic CE inhibition.
Interestingly, Ren-2 and rat renin in the gastrointestinal tract are not regulated in parallel as in the kidney. After CE inhibition, endogenous rat renin mRNA, although undetectable in untreated TGR(mREN-2)27 or SD rats, was massively induced, whereas the highly expressed mouse transgene was not affected at all. A similar pattern was observed in thymus, a major site of high Ren-2 expression, where only the endogenous rat renin expression is positively regulated by CE inhibitors. In contrast to this, only mouse renin mRNA was induced in testes. The absence of inducibility of the transgene in stomach and thymus suggests either the presence of rat speciesspecific trans-acting factors or the absence of cis-acting factors within the transgene. Possible functions of an intestinal RAS, besides water and electrolyte absorption, include regulation of mesenteric conductance32 and microvascular permeability.33 Zhao et al34 recently showed that the Ren-2 gene is regulated in the intestine of mice by dietary changes and in transgenic rats during ontogeny.11 Whether overexpression of renin leads to increased resorption of water via enhanced Ang II generation and whether this effect contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension in the transgenic rat remains to be investigated.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the transgene not only is expressed in an organ-specific manner but also is subject to tissue-specific regulation by CE inhibition. Differential expression of renin and angiotensinogen suggests regulatory mechanisms on the transcriptional level dependent on cell-specific properties. We have no proof for every tissue overexpressing Ren-2, but the facts that this overexpression is accompanied by increased local generation of Ang II, high intra-adrenal Ang II as described here, and continuous release of Ang II from perfused hindquarter preparations of transgenic rats after bilateral nephrectomy35 strongly suggest that enhanced Ang II formation is also present in other tissues. The physiological significance of localized RAS in tissues, which seem not to be directly involved in blood pressure control, is still unclear, and this study cannot address causal relations of differential gene expression with functional responses. However, we speculate that they function as paracrine systems mediating local tissue perfusion, hormone release, resorptive processes, or inflammatory responses, thereby regulating individual tissue function independent of the circulating counterpart.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received July 11, 1994; first decision August 10, 1994; accepted November 29, 1994.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Whaley-Connell, J. Habibi, S. A. Cooper, V. G. DeMarco, M. R. Hayden, C. S. Stump, D. Link, C. M. Ferrario, and J. R. Sowers Effect of renin inhibition and AT1R blockade on myocardial remodeling in the transgenic Ren2 rat Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2008; 295(1): E103 - E109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Henriksen Improvement of insulin sensitivity by antagonism of the renin-angiotensin system Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): R974 - R980. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Sloniger, V. Saengsirisuwan, C. J. Diehl, B. B. Dokken, N. Lailerd, A. M. Lemieux, J. S. Kim, and E. J. Henriksen Defective insulin signaling in skeletal muscle of the hypertensive TG(mREN2)27 rat Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2005; 288(6): E1074 - E1081. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Vongvatcharanon, S. Vongvatcharanon, N. Radenahmad, P. Kirirat, P. Intasaro, P. Sobhon, and T. Parker Angiotensin II may mediate apoptosis via AT1-receptors in the rat cardiac conduction system Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2004; 5(3): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kurdi, C. Cerutti, J. Randon, L. McGregor, and G. Bricca Macroarray analysis in the hypertrophic left ventricle of renin-dependent hypertensive rats: identification of target genes for renin Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2004; 5(2): 72 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Seccia, A. S. Belloni, R. Kreutz, M. Paul, G. G. Nussdorfer, A. C. Pessina, and G. P. Rossi Cardiac fibrosis occurs early and involves endothelin and AT-1 receptors in hypertension due to endogenous angiotensin II J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2003; 41(4): 666 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Peters, R. Farrenkopf, S. Clausmeyer, J. Zimmer, S. Kantachuvesiri, M. G.F. Sharp, and J. J. Mullins Functional Significance of Prorenin Internalization in the Rat Heart Circ. Res., May 31, 2002; 90(10): 1135 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Zolk, J. Quattek, U. Seeland, A. El-Armouche, T. Eschenhagen, and M. Bohm Activation of the cardiac endothelin system in left ventricular hypertrophy before onset of heart failure in TG(mREN2)27 rats Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2002; 53(2): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Bishop, L. A. Kiernan, H. E. Montgomery, P. Gohlke, and J. R. McEwan Raised blood pressure, not renin-angiotensin systems, causes cardiac fibrosis in TGR m(Ren2)27 rats Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2000; 47(1): 57 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim and H. Iwao Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Angiotensin II-Mediated Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2000; 52(1): 11 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Lee-Kirsch, F. Gaudet, M. C. Cardoso, and K. Lindpaintner Distinct Renin Isoforms Generated by Tissue-Specific Transcription Initiation and Alternative Splicing Circ. Res., February 5, 1999; 84(2): 240 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Jacinto, J. J. Mullins, and K. D. Mitchell Enhanced renal vascular responsiveness to angiotensin II in hypertensive ren-2 transgenic rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): F315 - F322. [Abstract] |