(Hypertension. 1995;25:679-682.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Metabolic Research Unit and Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco.
Correspondence to David G. Gardner, MD, Metabolic Research Unit, Box 0540 1141 HSW, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atrial natriuretic peptide genes, fos heart hypertrophy gene expression
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sharing extensive sequence homology at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, fra-1 and c-fos are members of the same gene family3 ; fra-1 is activated by many of the same stimuli that effect increments in c-fos gene expression,3 4 and it has activity similar to that of c-fos in a number of biological systems.5 6 We sought to determine whether fra-1 would share the relatively unique biphasic activity of the c-fos prototype in the cardiac myocyte. Our findings suggest that the effects of fra-1 are dependent on cellular context. In the atrial myocyte fra-1 mimics the suppressant activity of c-fos, and in the ventricular myocyte it behaves as a typical transcriptional activator.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmid Construction
Fusion plasmids linking the human ANP gene promoter sequence to
the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter have
been described elsewhere.7 There are 410 bp of the human
ANP gene 5' flanking sequence harbored by -410hANPCAT upstream from
the CAT reporter. The fra-1 expression vector
(RSV-fra) was provided to us by J. Miner,8 the
RSVc-jun by R. Tjian,9 and the BK28 (FBJ LTR
c-fos) by I. Verma.10 Chimeric domain-swap
mutations of rat fra-1 and c-fos were
constructed8 and provided to us by J. Miner. Each mutant,
as well as the wild-type proto-onocogenes, were expressed from the same
RSV promoter. The
fos mutant, harboring a 70amino acid
deletion at its carboxy terminus, was derived from the parent BK28 as
described previously.2
Cell Isolation and Transfection
Primary cultures of neonatal rat atrial and ventricular cardiac
myocytes were generated by use of established techniques.7
On the day of isolation, cells were mixed with DNA and electroporated
(Bio-Rad Gene Pulser) at 250 µF and 280 V at a cell density of
107 cells per 0.4 mL PBS containing 0.1%
glucose.2 Additional carrier plasmid (pUC 18) was added to
each culture to keep transfected DNA concentration constant at 40 µg.
Cells were cultured in DME-H21 medium containing 10% enriched calf
serum. Medium was changed 24 hours after transfection and again 24
hours later, at which point 1.5 mmol/L exogenous CaCl2 was
added. Cells were harvested and lysed 72 hours after transfection, and
CAT activity was measured using the method of Neumann et
al.11 CAT activity is expressed as
[3H]acetylchloramphenicol-produced counts per 100 µg
protein. A mock reaction containing no protein was included in each CAT
assay to determine background activity, which was subtracted from each
experimental value. Each experiment was carried out at least two to
three times with similar results. Representative experiments are
presented. Where appropriate, statistical analyses were carried out
using one-way ANOVA and the Newman-Keuls test for significance
(P<.05). Treatment of animals conformed to institutional
guidelines.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In ventricular cardiocytes, transfection of an fra-1 expression vector alone had a minimal effect (approximately 10% inhibition) on -410hANPCAT reporter activity (Fig 1A). However, in contrast to the repression of c-jundependent activity seen with c-fos (see below), the c-jun/fra-1 combination specified strong enhancement of human ANPCAT reporter activity (Fig 1A). Cotransfection with c-jun produced a fivefold stimulation, and in the presence of fra-1, activity increased 16-fold over that with -410hANPCAT alone. Thus, fra-1 had neutral or modestly inhibitory properties when used alone yet displayed a synergistic activation in the presence of c-jun. At the same time, fra-1 did not interact to a significant degree with jun B (Fig 1B).
|
In atrial myocytes the situation was quite different; fra-1 promoted a significant decrease in c-jundependent human ANP gene transcription (Fig 2). Data compiled from several experiments are presented in composite form in Table 1 and suggest that there are fundamental differences in the ways that atrial and ventricular myocytes recognize and respond to this proto-oncogene product.
|
|
We conjectured that this discrepant regulatory activity might reflect a
property intrinsic to the atrial myocyte that, in some fashion, renders
all fos activity inhibitory at the level of the ANP
promoter. To address this issue, we used a
fos mutant
that harbors a 70amino acid deletion at its carboxy terminus. This
deletion has proved effective at removing a putative inhibitory domain
from this portion of the fos molecule and rendering the
residual molecule stimulatory at the level of the ANP promoter in
cardiac ventricular myocytes2 (Fig 3A). As
shown in Fig 3B, cotransfection with
fos led to a
"dose"-dependent increment in c-junactivatable human
ANPCAT reporter activity in the atrial myocyte population. This
argues against the intrinsic negativity of c-fos and
fos-like gene products in the cardiac atriocyte and suggests
that c-fos, as well as fra-1, possesses two
independent activities: one inhibitory, which appears to dominate in
the experimental paradigms used here, and the other stimulatory, which
becomes manifest only when the inhibitory activity is suppressed by
permutations in the level of proto-oncogene expression,2
cellular context (Figs 1 and 2), or structural mutation2
(Fig 3).
|
Finally, to characterize further the stimulatory response of fra-1 in ventricular myocytes, we attempted to localize the structural region of the fra-1 protein responsible for the activity. To accomplish this, we used a series of fra-1/c-fos domain swap mutants constructed and characterized previously by Miner and Yamamoto.8 As shown in the schematic depicted in Fig 4, the fra-1 and c-fos cDNAs were divided into four domains on the basis of regions of shared functional and structural homology. Domain 2 contains the basic DNA binding region and domain 3 harbors the leucine zipper motif thought to be important for heterodimerization.8 Domains 1 and 4 contain the residual amino terminal and carboxy terminal domains, respectively. The mutant constructs have exchanged one or more structural domains into the heterologous proto-oncogene backbone. As shown in Table 2, each of the chimeric constructions displayed a phenotype intermediate between that of fra-1 (ie, stimulatory) and c-fos (ie, inhibitory). Of the group, RRFF, which harbors the fra-1 sequence in the amino terminal and DNA binding domains, gave the highest level of expression in the presence of c-jun (50% increase in activity), while c-jun+FRRR and c-jun+FRFF were functionally neutral with regard to reporter activity.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differences in intrinsic inhibitory activity could be due to structural differences between the two proteins; c-fos and fra-1 share a high degree of sequence homology in the DNA binding/leucine zipper and extreme carboxy terminal domains, but these domains are separated by regions that possess less sequence conservation. Abate et al13 have localized the inhibitory regions of c-fos to residues 58 through 116 and 270 through 380. The importance of the latter domain for transcriptional suppression has been confirmed by several groups,14 including our own2 (Fig 3). Sequence homology between c-fos and fra-1 across the carboxy terminal 18 amino acids, harboring key serine residues known to be important for inhibitory activity, is on the order of 80% and conserves all but a single serine residue. Sequence homology in the amino terminal region of the two proteins is more limited. It is conceivable that differences in the primary sequence or conformation of this latter domain could account for the differences in their respective capacities for promoter suppression or activation. The chimeric mutation data offer some support for this model. Although the data suggest that most, if not all, of the individual structural domains are required to demonstrate full activating (ie, fra-1) or inhibitory (c-fos) activity, two of the domains (the amino terminal and DNA binding domains) appear to be particularly important. Retention of fra-1 amino terminal sequence RRFF provided the only phenotype that approached that of fra-1 alone, while replacement of the amino terminal domain with c-fos sequence FRFF resulted in a neutral, though not frankly inhibitory, response. Furthermore, substitution of c-fos for fra-1 in the amino terminal domain (FRRR) was sufficient to eliminate the stimulatory activity of fra-1. The fact that FRFF effected a neutral phenotype implies that the DNA binding domain also plays a role in determining the direction of the fos/fra-1 effect. This latter domain has recently been shown to play a similarly important role in establishing the direction of glucocorticoid-regulated transcription of a composite element in the proliferin gene promoter.8
Taken together, these findings suggest variability in the biological effects even among highly homologous members of the same transcription factor gene family. Such variability would be predicted to broaden the repertoire of biological responses available to the ANP gene promoter and thereby render it more sensitive to the environmental cues that serve to regulate it.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Kovacic-Milivojevic B, Gardner DG. Divergent regulation of
the human atrial natriuretic peptide gene by c-jun and
c-fos. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:292-301.
3.
Cohen DR, Curran T. Fra-1: a serum-inducible,
cellular immediate-early gene that encodes a fos-related
antigen. Mol Cell Biol. 1988;8:2063-2069.
4.
Gizang-Ginsberg E, Ziff EB. Fos family members
successively occupy the tyrosine hydroxylase gene AP-1 site after nerve
growth factor or epidermal growth factor stimulation and can repress
transcription. Mol Endocrinol. 1994;8:249-262.
5. Ryseck R-P, Bravo R. c-jun, jun B and jun D differ in their binding affinities to AP-1 and CRE consensus sequences: effect of fos proteins. Oncogene. 1991;6:533-542. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Cohen DR, Ferreira PCP, Gentz R, Franza BR, Curran T. The
product of a fos-related gene, fra-1, binds
cooperatively to the AP-1 site with jun: transcription
factor AP-1 is comprised of multiple protein complexes. Genes
Dev. 1989;3:173-184.
7.
Wu J, Kovacic-Milivojevic B, Lapointe M, Nakamura K, Gardner
DG. Cis-active determinants of cardiac-specific expression
in the human atrial natriuretic peptide gene. Mol
Endocrinol. 1991;5:1311-1322.
8.
Miner J, Yamamoto KR. The basic region of AP-1 specifies
glucocorticoid receptor activity at a composite response element.
Genes Dev. 1992;6:2491-2501.
9.
Turner R, Tjian T. Leucine repeats and adjacent DNA binding
domain mediate the formation of functional
c-fos-c-jun heterodimers. Science. 1989;243:1689-1694.
10. Sassone-Corsi P, Lamph WW, Kamps M, Verma IM. Fos-associated cellular p39 is related to nuclear transcription factor AP-1. Cell. 1988;54:553-560. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Neumann JR, Morency CA, Russian KO. A novel rapid assay for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene expression. Biotechniques. 1987;5:444-447.
12. Kovacic-Milivojevic B, Gardner DG. Regulation of the human atrial natriuretic peptide gene in atrial cardiocytes by the transcription factor AP-1. Am J Hypertens. 1993;6:258-263. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Abate C, Luk D, Curran T. Transcriptional regulation of
fos and jun in vitro: interaction among multiple
activator and regulatory domains. Mol Cell Biol. 1991;11:3624-3632.
14. Ofir R, Dwarki VJ, Rashid D, Verma IM. Phosphorylation of the C terminus of fos protein is required for transcriptional transrepression of the c-fos promoter. Nature. 1990;348:80-82.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Ricci, U. Eriksson, G. Y. Oudit, R. Eferl, A. Akhmedov, I. Sumara, G. Sumara, Z. Kassiri, J.-P. David, L. Bakiri, et al. Distinct functions of junD in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure Genes & Dev., January 15, 2005; 19(2): 208 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A.A. van Heugten, M. C. van Setten, K. Eizema, P. D. Verdouw, and J. M.J. Lamers Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase promoter activity during endothelin-1 induced hypertrophy of cultured rat cardiomyocytes Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 1998; 37(2): 503 - 514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Cornelius, S. R. Holmer, F. U. Muller, G. A. J. Riegger, and H. Schunkert Regulation of the Rat Atrial Natriuretic Peptide Gene After Acute Imposition of Left Ventricular Pressure Overload Hypertension, December 1, 1997; 30(6): 1348 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |