Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;25:981-985

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giampietro, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedrinelli, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giampietro, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedrinelli, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure

(Hypertension. 1995;25:981-985.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Microalbuminuria and Erythrocyte Sodium-Hydrogen Exchange in Essential Hypertension

Ottavio Giampietro; Elena Matteucci; Giosué Catapano; Giulia Dell'Omo; Luigi Talarico; Carmine Di Muro; Vitantonio Di Bello; Roberto Pedrinelli

From Clinica Medica I and II, University of Pisa (Italy).


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Microalbuminuria (urinary albumin excretion between 20 and 200 µg/min) and abnormalities of red blood cell sodium-hydrogen exchange coexist in essential hypertensive patients. To evaluate how the two phenomena relate, we recruited 10 untreated microalbuminuric male essential hypertensive patients without diabetes to be compared with an equal number of matched essential hypertensive patients excreting albumin in normal amounts as well as 10 healthy control subjects. Sodium-hydrogen exchange values were increased to a comparable extent in microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric hypertensive patients. Systolic and mean blood pressures were higher in microalbuminuric patients. Fasting insulin was greater and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol lower in patients than control subjects. Urinary albumin excretion correlated positively with both mean blood pressure and left ventricular mass values in the absence of a relationship with circulating lipid and insulin levels. In contrast with microalbuminuria, sodium-hydrogen exchange covaried only with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin levels. Thus, microalbuminuria and an abnormal sodium-hydrogen exchange are unrelated phenomena in essential hypertensive patients. Microalbuminuria appears to be a hemodynamically driven biological variable, while an accelerated sodium-hydrogen exchange seems primarily conditioned by the metabolic abnormalities of hypertension, possibly in the context of an insulin-resistant syndrome.


Key Words: albuminuria • ion transport • insulin • lipids • hypertension, essential


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Microalbuminuria is associated with a dysfunctional vascular endothelium1 and an increased left ventricular mass (LVM)2 in hypertensive patients and predicts cardiovascular events in nondiabetic subjects.3 4 Thus, this frequent abnormality in essential hypertension5 represents more than a sign of renal damage, of which an understanding is still incomplete. Evidence from insulin-dependent diabetics showed an important correlation between microalbuminuria and sodium-lithium (Na+-Li+) countertransport,6 a mode of operation of the sodium-hydrogen (Na+-H+) antiport, which regulates cell volume and growth.7 Greater urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and cardiac mass were also found in essential hypertensive patients, who were characterized by an elevated Na+-Li+ countertransport,8 a genetically determined system,9 and a possible inherited marker for cardiovascular complications of hypertension.10 Thus, microalbuminuria and an abnormal activity of the Na+-H+ exchange might be directly linked even in essential hypertensive patients. However, no data are available to confirm or negate this possibility.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
We included carefully age-matched (±3 years) male subjects in the sample to exclude possible gender- and age-related confounders. Preliminary exclusion criteria were malignant or accelerated hypertension, congestive heart failure, body mass index greater than 30 kg/m2, diabetes (fasting glucose >7.8 mmol/L), previous myocardial infarction, or renal and connective tissue diseases. Normal serum creatinine (<106.8 µmol/L), urinary sediment, and urine culture were also required. Once a potential subject was identified, eligibility for the study was reserved for those with a good acoustic window for determination of echocardiographic parameters and an absence at Doppler examination of valvular lesions that might contribute to hypertrophy. Biochemical, urinary, and cardiac determinations were obtained at intervals not longer than 2 weeks. The final study sample included 30 men divided into the following three groups. Ten essential hypertensive patients with microalbuminuria (see below) underwent a full clinical, biochemical, and instrumental workup for secondary hypertension, including an angiographic procedure, if needed. Renal ultrasound scan showed normal-sized kidneys and no evidence of cortical scarring or obstructive uropathy. This group was matched with 10 essential hypertensive patients with normal UAE who underwent a similar diagnostic procedure. Patients had blood pressure (BP) values consistently greater than 140/90 mm Hg as outpatients and were taking no medications for at least 2 weeks. No patient had been on diuretics, ß-blockers, or other drugs that affect lipid profile. Ten healthy, age-matched subjects were the control group. A consistent portion of our hypertensive patients could not offer reliable data regarding family history of hypertension; therefore, we did not pursue this issue. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Committee; the procedures were explained in detail, and subjects consented to them.

Experimental Procedures
Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (Korotkoff phase V) were measured by mercury sphygmomanometer in the morning with participants in a supine position. The reported value was the mean of 10 indirect recordings taken over a 30-minute period. Anthropometric measurements (height and weight) were made after each participant had removed his shoes and upper garments. Blood samples were obtained between 8 and 9 AM after an overnight fast.

Red Blood Cell Na+-H+ Antiport
Red blood cell (RBC) Na+-H+ antiport activity was quantified as amiloride-sensitive H+ efflux from acid-loaded cells. In detail, blood was collected into heparinized syringes, transferred into glass tubes, and centrifuged at 60g for 9 minutes at ambient temperature. Plasma and buffy coat were aspirated and the cells washed three times with a buffer containing cold isotonic saline solution and 5 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.4 (cell-to-buffer ratio, 1:4). Then cells were spun at 1320g for 5 minutes at 4°C, the buffer and white cell buffy coat were removed by suction, and the packed RBC pellets were kept in ice until assay. A 0.2-mL nominal volume of packed RBCs was added to 3.8 mL of a solution (measured osmolality, 285±7 mOsm/kg; n=10) containing NaCl 150, KCI 1, MgCl2 1, and glucose 10 mmol/L incubated at 37°C for 5 minutes under magnetic stirring. The medium was then acidified (pH 6.35 to 6.45) by HCl (0.2N in 150 mmol/L NaCl), and 4,4'-diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS, 0.2 mmol/L, Sigma Chimica) was added 5 minutes later to inhibit the anion exchanger.11 After pH was raised to 7.95 to 8.00 by 0.05N NaOH, the medium acidification rate (expressed in micromoles per liter of cells per hour) was assessed by a microelectrode (pHmeter, model 691, Metrohm Ltd) at 10-second intervals for 1 minute in the absence and presence of amiloride (0.5 mmol/L, Sigma), an inhibitor of the Na+-H+ transport system.12 The proton efflux differences in the two conditions ({Delta}pH1-{Delta}pH2) were multiplied by the buffer capacity of the incubation medium (b, determined before each experiment by titration with NaOH and HCl) and were corrected for the actual cellular fraction in the suspension (m, 0.82±0.04, n=15, preliminary measurements) and the incubation time (t) according to the formula ({Delta}pH1-{Delta}pH2)xbxm-1xt-1.13

The intra-assay coefficients of variation of 10 triplicate measurements of pH1, pH2, and buffer capacity were 5.3%, 6.6%, and 3.6%, respectively. The actual intracellular pH achieved during acidification was measured in suspensions (n=10 replicates) of packed RBCs lysed through double-distilled water as described by other authors.14 Cellular pH in media acidified at 6.35 to 6.45 U for 5 minutes was 6.44±0.05 U and did not change when the incubation time was prolonged up to 15 minutes. Cell volume (estimated as the ratio of the optical density of hemoglobin at 541 nm in a spectrophotometer [Kontron 860] and hematocrit [by micromethod]) was 2.78±0.05 in basal conditions and 2.85±0.1 (n=4 replicates) at 1 minute after acidification, ie, an average 2.5% increase from basal.

The present method for determination of RBC Na+-H+ exchange generates absolute values lower than those obtained by other researchers15 for at least two reasons. First, amiloride-sensitive H+ efflux is only a part (60% to 80%) of the total proton efflux from acid-loaded cells.14 Second, we measured proton efflux rate at an intracellular pH of 6.44, whereas the reaction Vmax can be assessed only at lower pH values.15 On the other hand, our milder cellular acidification procedure has the methodological advantage of avoiding the use of hypertonic media15 to prevent marked cell swelling induced by chloride redistribution in strongly acid media.

Urine Collections
To minimize the confounding influence of daily physical activity and to facilitate the collection procedure, our outpatients collected urine from 8 PM to 8 AM during three consecutive days as already described.1 2 Urinary albumin was measured by nephelometry (Istituto Behring SpA), with a detection limit of 0.6 mg/dL and an interassay coefficient of variation of 3.5%.16 The elevated biological variability of UAE (34%, average of 30 variation coefficients of triplicate urinary collections) was confirmed1 2 even in this sample.

Echocardiographic Studies
Interventricular septal thickness (IVST), posterior wall thickness (PWT), and chamber volumes were measured by monodimensional and bidimensional echocardiograms (Hewlett-Packard Sonos 1000) with 2.5- and 3.5-MHz transducers as described in detail17 to derive LVM according to the Penn Convention.

Metabolic Parameters
Blood glucose was measured by gluco-oxidase. Immunoreactive insulin (IRI) concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay (Sorin; sensitivity, 2.5±0.27 µIU/mL; within- and between-assay variations, 5.5% to 6.6% and 6.2% to 9.7%, respectively; range, 5.1 to 130.8 µIU/mL). Serum concentrations of total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL, after precipitation of low-density lipoprotein [LDL] and very-low-density lipoprotein fractions through phosphotungstic acid and magnesium chloride) cholesterol and triglycerides (average coefficient of variation of control pool: 2%, 5%, and 2%, respectively) were assessed by enzymatic colorimetric techniques (cholesterol oxidase/peroxidase aminoantipirine and glycerol phosphate oxidase/peroxidase aminoantipirine, Menarini, Divisione Diagnostici, Firenze, Italy). LDL cholesterol was calculated as Total Cholesterol-(HDL Cholesterol+Triglycerides/5).

Data Analysis and Statistics
RBC Na+-H+ exchange was an average of proton efflux values measured every 10 seconds over 1 minute. Microalbuminuria was defined as a value equal to or greater than 20 µg/min and less than 200 µg/min18 ; LVM was indexed for height (grams per meter) to take into account the effect of body weight. Mean BP (MBP) and body mass index were derived through standard formulas.

Log transformation was applied to UAE, RBC Na+-H+ exchange, triglycerides, and IRI data, as these variables were distributed in a skewed manner. Descriptive statistics are arithmetic means±SD or medians with range for log-transformed data. Statistical analysis was based on the comparison among matched groups through one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple comparison test to check between-group differences. Correlation coefficients were calculated according to standard formulas; determination coefficients (r2) were used to quantify the amount of variability explained by the regression. Multiple regression analysis was performed conventionally by testing the statistical significance of each regression coefficient through t test and calculating 95% confidence limits. A value of P<.05 was chosen as statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Median UAE was 10 µg/min (range, 7.9 to 12.1) and 10.7 µg/min (range, 6.4 to 17.7) in control subjects and nonmicroalbuminuric patients, respectively, versus 45 µg/min (range, 22.2 to 194) in microalbuminuric patients. RBC Na+-H+ exchange was elevated in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive subjects (P<.0001) irrespective of microalbuminuric status (Fig 1).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Scatterplot shows red blood cell (RBC) Na+-H+ exchange values (in micromoles per liter per hour) in the experimental groups.

SBP and MBP were greater in microalbuminuric than normoalbuminuric patients; DBP was comparable. LVM index, IVST, and PWT were increased to a comparable extent in the two groups of hypertensive patients compared with control subjects (Table 1). Overall (n=30), MBP values showed a statistically significant correlation with both UAE and RBC Na+-H+ exchange (Fig 2). However, the strength of the association differed markedly (UAE: r=.77, P<.00001, r2=.59; RBC Na+-H+ exchange: r=.36, P<.05, r2=.13). Furthermore, when hypertensive patients (n=20) were analyzed separately from normotensive subjects, the relationship held for UAE (r=.62, P<.003) but not for RBC Na+-H+ exchange (r=.19, P=NS). SBP behaved as MBP. A weaker but highly significant correlation was found between LVM index and UAE (r=.45, P<.01, n=30) but not RBC Na+-H+ exchange (r=.20). The behavior of IVST (UAE: r=.42, P<.02; RBC Na+-H+ exchange: r=.32, P=NS) and PWT (UAE: r=.41, P<.02; RBC Na+-H+ exchange: r=.28, P=NS) did not differ from that of LVM index.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Age, Blood Pressure, Left Ventricular Mass Index, and Interventricular and Posterior Wall Thicknesses in Control Subjects and Nonmicroalbuminuric and Microalbuminuric Hypertensive Patients



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Scatterplots show urinary albumin excretion (UAE, log scale, micrograms per minute) and red blood cell (RBC) Na+-H+ exchange (log scale, micromoles per liter per hour) vs mean blood pressure (MBP, millimeters of mercury). Data are pooled for hypertensive and normotensive subjects. {blacktriangleup} indicates control subjects; {square}, nonmicroalbuminuric hypertensive patients; and {bullet}, microalbuminuric hypertensive patients; n=10 per group.

Fasting IRI (P<.03) was higher and HDL lower (P<.0001) in microalbuminuric and normoalbuminuric hypertensive patients than normotensive subjects. Blood glucose did not differ (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Body Mass Index and Cholesterol, Triglyceride, Insulin, and Blood Glucose Levels in Control Subjects and Nonmicroalbuminuric and Microalbuminuric Hypertensive Patients

Total and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides were higher in microalbuminuric patients compared with both nonmicroalbuminuric patients and control subjects, although the differences in triglycerides did not achieve the formal limits of statistical significance (F2,27=2.9, P<.1) (Table 2). Significant correlations existed between UAE and total (r=.48, n=30, P<.008) and HDL (r=-.54, n=30, P<.001) cholesterol as well as triglycerides (r=.44, n=30, P<.01). However, when these variables were combined with MBP in a multiple regression analysis for evaluation of their independent contribution to UAE variability, only BP showed a statistically significant (P<.01) association.

HDL cholesterol (r=-.57, n=30, P<.001; Fig 3) and IRI (r=.38, n=30, P<.05) were significantly related with RBC Na+-H+ exchange, whereas total cholesterol (r=.24), LDL cholesterol (r=.30), and triglycerides (r=.28) were not.



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scatterplot shows high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (millimoles per liter) vs red blood cell (RBC) Na+-H+ exchange (micromoles per liter per hour, log scale). Data are pooled for hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Symbols as in Fig 2; n=10 per group.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study confirms13 19 the accelerated rate of Na+-H+ exchange found in erythrocytes and in platelets,20 lymphocytes,21 and leukocytes22 of patients with essential hypertension with the use of methods different from ours. Thus, independently from the assay technique, circulating cells of hypertensive patients consistently show evidence of an abnormal Na+-H+ exchange. However, we did not examine the molecular mechanisms of this abnormality, its relationship with family history of hypertension, the possibility of women showing the same results as men, and the extent to which circulating cells reflect the involvement of extravascular tissues. An important finding of our study was the independence of the abnormal RBC Na+-H+ exchange from the concurrent UAE in our hypertensive patients. This contrasts with insulin-dependent diabetics,6 in whom microalbuminuria and BP levels were strongly associated with an increased Na+-Li+ efflux, a supposed mode of operation of the Na+-H+ antiport.7 Evidently, the relationship between microalbuminuria, BP, and cellular proton exchange differs in essential hypertensive patients versus insulin-dependent diabetics, at least to the extent that Na+-Li+ and Na+-H+ exchange share the same biological meaning. An apparent discrepancy emerged also with previous data obtained in essential hypertensive patients,8 in whom UAE tended to be higher if the Na+-Li+ exchange rate was activated. However, the low number of hypertensive patients with a normal RBC Na+-H+ antiport activity made those and our results not comparable. BP levels were greater in microalbuminuric patients and, as in other groups of subjects,1 2 18 23 correlated strongly with UAE. Although weaker, a statistically significant correlation also linked UAE and a long-term indicator of pressure load such as LVM index. This result confirms previous data,2 the biological importance of which is strengthened when the intrinsically elevated variability of UAE is considered. The tendency of UAE to reach pretreatment levels shortly after drug withdrawal24 might also concur with the lower strength of association with cardiac mass, a structural index of cardiovascular injury that takes a longer time to modify.25 As in larger scale studies,26 total and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides tended to cluster in higher concentrations in our small microalbuminuric group. However, a multiple regression analysis confirmed the predominant influence of pressure versus lipids on UAE.

If hypertensive microalbuminuria was primarily a hemodynamic correlate, RBC Na+-H+ exchange showed no relationship with pressure and wall thickness values. These data are not expected from a system supposedly involved in the cardiovascular restructuring process of hypertension.7 Rather, RBC Na+-H+ exchange was heavily influenced by the metabolic status of our hypertensive patients, who not surprisingly,27 showed abnormal lipid and insulin levels. The significant inverse correlation between RBC Na+-H+ exchange and HDL cholesterol levels is a second relevant result of our study, consistent with evidence collected on Na+-Li+ countertransport.28 29 At variance with HDL cholesterol, the relationships with total and LDL cholesterol and triglycerides did not achieve statistical significance, but we cannot discern whether the discrepancy is due to the small size of our sample or from the only partial similarity between Na+-Li+ countertransport and RBC Na+-H+ exchange.13 15 30 Thus, caution is needed in extrapolating further on this point. Abnormal HDL cholesterol levels may affect directly the membrane structure31 and therefore also its cationic transport systems. However, the activation of RBC Na+-H+ exchange might be a consequence of the elevated insulin, a hormone that can directly stimulate the antiport.32 In fact, as in other samples,33 even our hypertensive patients were characterized by elevated fasting insulin. This finding is consistent with both a reduced insulin clearance34 and insulin resistance, this latter a frequent occurrence in hypertension,35 although we did not perform insulin stimulation tests or clamp studies to evaluate more precisely these possibilities. It is interesting that insulin resistance and high Na+-Li+ countertransport and Na+-H+ exchange activity were associated in both essential hypertensive patients36 37 and normotensive diabetics.38 Finally, the comparable fasting insulin levels between hypertensive patients with elevated and normal UAE confirm2 that hyperinsulinemia and microalbuminuria are uncoupled phenomena in essential hypertensive patients. This conclusion does not seem to apply to diabetics, in whom microalbuminuria may have broader metabolic implications.39

In conclusion, RBC Na+-H+ exchange was abnormal in essential hypertensive patients irrespective of the concurrent UAE level. UAE was primarily related to hemodynamic variables such as BP and LVM index; lipid and insulin levels were not influential. In contrast, RBC Na+-H+ exchange was independent of the pressure load and influenced mainly by HDL cholesterol levels, possibly in the context of an insulin-resistant status.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr Roberto Pedrinelli, I Clinica Medica, University of Pisa, 56100 Pisa, Italy. E-mail idd@vm.cnuce.cnr.it.

Received July 18, 1994; first decision October 12, 1994; accepted December 27, 1994.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Pedrinelli R, Giampietro O, Carmassi F, Melillo E, Dell'Omo G, Catapano G, Matteucci E, Talarico L, Morale M, De Negri F, Di Bello V. Microalbuminuria and endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1994;344:14-18. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Pedrinelli R, DiBello VA, Catapano G, Talarico L, Materazzi F, Santoro G, Giusti C, Mosca F, Melillo E, Ferrari M. Microalbuminuria is a marker of left ventricular hypertrophy but not hyperinsulinemia in nondiabetic atherosclerotic patients. Arteriosclerosis. 1993;13:900-906. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Damsgaard ME, Froland A, Jorgensen DO, Mogensen CE. Microalbuminuria as predictor of increased mortality in elderly people. Br Med J. 1990;300:297-300.

4. Yudkin JS, Forrest RD, Jackson CA. Microalbuminuria as predictor of vascular disease in non-diabetic subjects. Lancet. 1988;2:531-534.

5. Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Campese VM, Baldari G. Prevalence of microalbuminuria in a large population of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Nephron. 1992;61:94-97. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Jones SL, Trevisan R, Tariq T, Semplicini A, Mattock M, Walker JD, Nosadini R, Viberti G. Sodium-lithium countertransport in microalbuminuric insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Hypertension. 1990;15:570-575. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Mahnensmith RL, Aronson PS. The plasma membrane sodium-hydrogen exchanger and its role in physiological and pathophysiological processes. Circ Res. 1985;56:773-788. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Nosadini R, Semplicini A, Fioretto P, Lusioani L, Trevisan R, Donadon V, Nicolosi GL, Dall'Aglio V, Zanuttini D, Viberti GC. Sodium-lithium countertransport and cardiorenal abnormalities in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;18:191-198. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hasstedt SJ, Hunt SC, Wu LL, Williams RR. The inheritance of intraerythrocytic sodium levels. Am J Med Genet. 1988;29:193-203. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Morgan DB, Stewart AD, Davidson C. Relations between erythrocyte lithium efflux, blood pressure and family histories of hypertension and cardiovascular disease: studies in a factory workforce and hypertension clinic. J Hypertens. 1986;4:609-615. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Hladky SB, Rink RJ. pH Equilibrium across the red cell membrane. In: Ellory JC, Lew VL, eds. Membrane Transport in Red Cells. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977:115-136.

12. Benos DJ. Amiloride: a molecular probe of sodium transport in tissues and cells. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:C131-C145. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Orlov SN, Postnov IY, Pokudin NI, Kukharenko VY, Postnov YV. Na+-H+ exchange and other ion-transport systems in erythrocytes of essential hypertensives and spontaneously hypertensive rats: a comparative analysis. J Hypertens. 1989;7:781-788. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Escobales N, Canessa M. Amiloride-sensitive Na+ transport in human red cells: evidence for a Na/H exchange system. J Membr Biol. 1986;90:21-28. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Semplicini A, Spalvins A, Canessa M. Kinetics and stoichiometry of the human red cell Na+/H+ exchange. J Membr Biol. 1989;107:219-228. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Giampietro O, Penno G, Clerico A, Cruschelli L, Lucchetti A, Nannipieri M, Cecere M, Rizzo L, Navalesi R. Which method for quantifying `microalbuminuria' in diabetics? Acta Diabetol. 1992;28:239-245. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Pedrinelli R, Catapano G, Dell'Omo G, Melillo E, Talarico L, Di Muro C, Giampietro O, Carmassi F, Giusti C, Di Bello VA. Forearm blood flow reserve and the cardiac and renal indexes of pressure load in normotensive and hypertensive individuals. Hypertension. 1994;24:24-29. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Viberti GC. Mechanisms of diabetic renal and cardiovascular disease. Acta Diabetol. 1990;27:267-276.

19. Canessa M, Morgan K, Goldszer R, Moore TJ, Spalvins A. Kinetic abnormalities of the red blood cell sodium-proton exchange in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 1991;17:340-348. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Livne A, Veitch R, Grinstein S, Balfe JW, Marquez-Julio A, Rothstein A. Increased platelet Na+-H+ exchange rates in essential hypertension: application of a novel test. Lancet. 1987;1:533-536. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Wehling M, Kasmayr J, Theisen K. The Na+-H+ exchanger is stimulated and cell volume increased in lymphocytes from patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991;9:519-524. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Ng L, Dudley C, Bomford J, Hawley D. Leucocyte intracellular pH and Na+/H+ antiport activity in human hypertension. J Hypertens. 1989;7:471-475. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Gosling P, Beevers DG. Urinary albumin excretion and blood pressure in the general population. Clin Sci. 1989;76:39-42. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Christensen CK. Rapidly reversible albumin and ß2-microglobulin hyperexcretion in recent severe essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1983;1:45-51. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Dahlof B, Pennert K, Hansson L. Reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a metaanalysis of 109 treatment studies. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:95-110. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Gruber MK, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Patterson JK. Microalbuminuria: potential marker for increased cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects? Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:727-731. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Criqui MH, Cowan LD, Heiss G, Haskell WL, Laskarzewski PM, Chambless LE. Frequency and clustering of nonlipid coronary risk factors in dyslipoproteinemia: The Lipid Research Clinics Program Prevalence Study. Circulation. 1986;73(suppl I):I-40-I-50.

28. Corrocher R, Steinmayr M, Ruzzenente O, Brugnara C, Bertinato L, Mazzi M, Furri C, Bonfanti F, De Sandre G. Elevation of red cell sodium-lithium countertransport in hyperlipidemias. Life Sci. 1985;36:649-655. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Hunt SC, Williams RR, Smith JB, Ash KO. Associations of three erythrocyte cation transport systems with plasma lipids in Utah subjects. Hypertension. 1986;8:30-36. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Semplicini A, Canessa M, Mozzato MG, Ceolotto G, Marzola M, Buzzaccarini F, Casolino P, Pessina AC. Red blood cell Na+/H+ and Li+/Na+ exchange in patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:903-908. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Adragna NC, Chang JL, Morey MC, Williams RS. Effect of exercise on cation transport in human red cells. Hypertension. 1985;7:132-139. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Pontremoli R, Zerbini G, Rivera A, Canessa M. Insulin activation of red blood cell Na+/H+ exchange decreases the affinity of sodium sites. Kidney Int. 1994;46:365-373. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Denker PS, Pollock VE. Fasting serum insulin levels in essential hypertension: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1649-1651. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Salvatore T, Cozzolino D, Giunta R, Giugliano D, Torella R, D'Onofrio F. Decreased insulin clearance as a feature of essential hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74:144-149. [Abstract]

35. Ferrannini E, Buzzigoli G, Bonadonna R, Giorico MA, Oleggini M, Graziadei L, Pedrinelli R, Brandi L, Bevilacqua S. Insulin resistance in essential hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:350-357. [Abstract]

36. Doria A, Fioretto P, Avogaro A, Carraro A, Morocutti A, Trevisan R, Frigato F, Crepaldi G, Viberti G, Nosadini R. Insulin resistance is associated with high sodium-lithium countertransport in essential hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:E684-E691. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Canessa M, Falkner B, Hulman S. Red blood cell sodium-proton exchange in hypertensive blacks with insulin-resistant glucose disposal. Hypertension. 1993;22:204-213. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Catalano C, Winocour PH, Walker THT, Sum CF, Wilkinson R, Alberti KGMM. Erythrocyte sodium-lithium countertransport activity and total body insulin-mediated glucose disposal in normoalbuminuric normotensive type 1 (insulin dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 1993;36:52-56. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Groop L, Ekstrand A, Forsblom C, Widen E, Groop PH, Teppo AM, Eriksson J. Insulin resistance, hypertension and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1993;36:642-647.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. Pedrinelli, G. Penno, G. Dell'Omo, S. Bandinelli, D. Giorgi, V. Di Bello, R. Navalesi, and M. Mariani
Microalbuminuria and Transcapillary Albumin Leakage in Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 491 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. H. Weinberger
Salt Sensitivity of Blood Pressure in Humans
Hypertension, March 1, 1996; 27(3): 481 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giampietro, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedrinelli, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giampietro, O.
Right arrow Articles by Pedrinelli, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure