Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;25:1129-1134

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bird, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bird, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, W. E.

(Hypertension. 1995;25:1129-1134.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Potassium Negatively Regulates Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression in Human Adrenocortical H295R Cells

Ian M. Bird; R. Ann Word; Colin Clyne; J. Ian Mason; William E. Rainey

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Biochemistry, and Physiology and The Cecil H. and Ida Green Center for Reproductive Biology Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meriter Hospital, University of Wisconsin, Madison (I.M.B.).


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We have previously shown that the human adrenocortical H295R cell line expresses the type 1 angiotensin II receptor (AT1-R) and that expression of this receptor is downregulated at the level of mRNA by forskolin or dibutyryl-cAMP as well as by angiotensin II (Ang II). In this study we examine the effects of K+ on both AT1-R mRNA and receptors, as monitored through 125I–Ang II binding in the presence of PD 123319. After treatment with a maximal stimulatory steroidogenic dose of K+ (14 mmol/L), H295R cells showed an increase in cytosolic free Ca2+ from 113 to 212 nmol/L. Unlike the effects of Ang II, this increase could be abolished by pretreatment with the Ca2+ channel antagonist nifedipine (1 µmol/L). AT1-R mRNA levels also fell in response to elevated extracellular K+ in a dose-dependent (Kd, 9 mmol/L; maximal fall in message at 12 mmol/L) and time-dependent (maximum 50% at 12 hours) manner. The change in AT1-R mRNA level was less rapid than that in response to activation of phosphoinositidase C by Ang II or adenylyl cyclase by forskolin or by dibutyryl-cAMP. Unlike the action of Ang II but similar to the action of forskolin or dibutyryl-cAMP, the action of K+ was sustained. Changes in mRNA level in response to treatment with K+, Ang II, or dibutyryl-cAMP were also paralleled by changes in 125I–Ang II binding in each case. The mechanism of action of K+ on AT1-R mRNA also appears to be mediated through the opening of voltage-sensitive channels on the plasma membrane because the drop in AT1-R mRNA was similarly abolished by the Ca2+ channel blocker nifedipine. In conclusion, our findings show that AT1-R mRNA levels can be controlled through a Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway, as well as through phosphoinositidase C or adenylyl cyclase signaling pathways, and that these changes in mRNA level underlie a corresponding change in receptor protein at the cell surface.


Key Words: angiotensin II • receptor • potassium • adrenal • human • calcium


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The renin–angiotensin II (Ang II) system is a central component of the hormonal mechanisms regulating blood pressure as well as fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. At least two subpopulations of Ang II receptors (designated AT1 and AT2) have been identified as a result of the use of nonpeptide Ang II antagonists, and it is now clear that the AT1 receptor (AT1-R), coupled to phosphoinositidase C, is primarily involved in the control of vasoconstriction and electrolyte homeostasis.1 The recent cloning of the AT1-R from several species has made it possible to begin to define the mechanisms underlying hormonal regulation of AT1-R expression.2 3 Because of obvious limitations in the availability of tissues, few studies have been concerned with hormonal regulation of AT1-R expression in humans. However, studies in primary cultures of human adrenocortical cells have shown that AT1-R mRNA level is reduced by Ang II treatment.4 A human adrenocortical tumor cell line (H295R) is also available that expresses AT1-R functionally coupled to phosphoinositidase C and secretes aldosterone in response to Ang II.5 The level of AT1-R mRNA is also reduced in these cells after treatment with activators of both adenylyl cyclase and phosphoinositidase C,6 in agreement with the findings in human adrenocortical cell primary cultures.4 These changes in AT1-R mRNA are also analogous to that seen for rat AT1a-R mRNA in rat kidney mesangial cells7 but different from AT1b mRNA in the rat adrenal.8 9 10 However, while putative AT1a and AT1b mRNA species have also been isolated in humans, AT1b mRNA was not detectable in human adrenal.11 Thus the finding that AT1b mRNA and AT1-R levels in the rat adrenal increase rather than decrease in response to Ang II infusion, low sodium diet, or to a lesser extent high potassium diet8 9 10 probably relates to the expression of different gene products in the adrenals of each species.

We have recently reported that H295R cells secrete aldosterone in response to elevated K+,12 which is known to regulate aldosterone secretion in vivo independently of adenylyl cyclase or phosphoinositidase C activation.13 In the present study we demonstrate further that elevated K+ acts to increase cellular Ca2+ through opening voltage-sensitive channels and that increased cellular Ca2+ alone is also sufficient to promote a dose-dependent and sustained decrease in AT1-R mRNA as well as the AT1-R itself in human adrenocortical H295R cells.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Unless otherwise stated, laboratory reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. The agonists and antagonists used were KCl, [Asp1,Ile5]-Ang II, nifedipine, forskolin, dibutyryl-cAMP (dbcAMP), and the selective AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (Parke Davis). Fura 2-AM was obtained from Molecular Probes Inc.

Cell Culture
H295R cells were initially obtained as NCI-H295 cells from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and then selected as described previously.12 Because of growth and culture differences between the original ATCC cells and the selected subpopulation, these cells are designated as H295R cells. The H295R cells are available from ATCC as catalog No. CRL 2128. Cells were maintained in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's and Ham's F-12 media (DME/F-12 containing pyridoxine HCl, L-glutamine, and 15 mmol/L HEPES; Gibco BRL, catalog No. 11331-014) supplemented with insulin (6.25 µg/mL), transferrin (6.25 µg/mL), selenium (6.25 ng/mL), linoleic acid (5.35 µg/mL; 1% ITS plus, Collaborative Research), 2% low-protein serum replacement-1, and antibiotics. Cells were maintained and grown on 75-cm2 flasks (Costar) at 37°C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air. Cells were subcultured, and after 48 hours medium was removed and replaced with serum-free medium (DME/F-12 containing antibiotics and 0.01% bovine serum albumin [BSA]). Cells were cultured for a further 24 hours before treatment in the same medium.

Determination of [Ca2+]i in Fura 2–Loaded H295R Cells
Cells were plated onto glass coverslips and cultured in growth medium as described for 3 days. Cells were then loaded with fura 2-AM ester (5 µmol/L, Molecular Probes) in buffer (mmol/L: NaCl 130, KCl 4.8, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 1.5, Na2HPO4 1, glucose 15, and HEPES 10, as well as 1 mg/mL BSA, pH 7.4). Loading was achieved over 45 minutes at 37°C under a 5% CO2/95% O2 atmosphere. Cells were then rinsed and incubated for a further 20 minutes in the same buffer. Coverslips were mounted on a polytetrafluoroethylene frame in a cuvette containing buffer without fura 2 or albumin. The frame ensured a 30° angle of the coverslip to the incident/excitation fluorometer beam. All fluorescence measurements were made with a Perkin-Elmer 650-10S fluorescence spectrophotometer while the buffer was stirred with an electronically controlled paddle to ensure rapid mixing of added reagents. Excitation and emission wavelengths were 340 nm (slit width, 5 nm) and 510 nm (slit width, 5 nm), respectively. Autofluorescence of cells and buffers was measured and subtracted when necessary. Cytosolic free calcium ([Ca2+]i) was computed with the formula [Ca2+]i=Kd(F-Fmin)/(Fmax-F), where Kd=224 nmol/L; F is observed 340-nm fluorescence; Fmax is 340-nm fluorescence at a [Ca2+] (millimoles per liter) sufficient to saturate fura 2; and Fmin is 340-nm fluorescence at a [Ca2+] (nanomoles per liter) sufficient to give no significant binding to fura 2.14 15 A single excitation wavelength was used because the fluorometer was not equipped with an automated filter wheel. Concentrations calculated by this method did not differ by more than 5% from those calculated by the ratio method when excitation wavelength was changed manually.16

Northern Analysis for AT1-R mRNA Levels
Cells on 100-mm culture dishes were lysed into 1 mL RNAzol B solution (Cinna Biotecx) and transferred to a microfuge tube. Phase separation was achieved by mixing with 0.15 mL CHCl3, incubation at 4°C for 5 minutes, and centrifugation (12 000g, 20 minutes, 4°C). The upper phase (0.7 mL) was transferred to a second microfuge tube, and RNA was then precipitated by the addition of 0.8 mL isopropanol and standing for 1 hour at -20°C. RNA was recovered by centrifugation (30 minutes, 12 000g, 4°C), and the recovered pellet was washed once in 75% ethanol (1.0 mL) before being dried under air and dissolved in 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.0 (0.1 mL). After recovery and purity were determined by measurement of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm, samples were precipitated by the addition of 1 mL absolute ethanol and 0.01 mL sodium acetate (3 mol/L, pH 5.2) and stored at -70°C until analysis.

Samples were subjected to electrophoresis on gels containing 1.1% agarose (Bio-Rad) in the presence of formaldehyde. The presence and integrity of the major RNA species were examined under UV light to ensure consistency between lanes. RNA was transferred to a Magna NT membrane (MSI) by pressure blotting (75 psi, 1 hour; PossiBlot Pressure Blotter, Stratagene) and cross-linked under UV light. Prehybridization was carried out at 42°C overnight in a final buffer composition of 50% formamide, 5x SSC (20x SSC contains 3.0 mol/L NaCl and 0.3 mol/L trisodium citrate, pH 7.0), 1x PE (5x PE contains 250 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% sodium pyrophosphate, 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 1% Ficoll, 25 mmol/L EDTA, and 1% BSA), and 50 µg/mL tRNA. Hybridizations were performed in the same buffer at 42°C for 16 to 24 hours with bovine AT1-R antisense probe labeled by asymmetrical polymerase chain reaction with [32P]dCTP (Amersham).6 The blots were then washed in 2x SSC containing 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 15 minutes and in 0.1x SSC containing 0.1% SDS at room temperature for 2x30 minutes before being dried and quantified by direct radioimaging (AMBIS Systems, 12-hour direct exposure time) and then exposed to film (Hyperfilm, Amersham). Blots were subsequently stripped and reprobed for GAPDH mRNA. An antisense probe was prepared by asymmetrical polymerase chain reaction amplification of the human cDNA (bases 43-478) in the presence of [32P]dCTP, and hybridization and posthybridization wash conditions were exactly as described above. Specific hybridization was then evaluated by direct radioimaging as above. Results for AT1-R mRNA levels were corrected for minor variations in sample loading (according to the GAPDH content of each lane) before being expressed as percent AT1-R mRNA in the control sample of each experiment (100%).

Radiolabeled Ang II Binding Studies
Ang II receptor binding was determined on cultured cells as described previously.6 After treatment of cells on 12-well plates for the times indicated, cells were rinsed free of any bound agonists by brief incubation in acidified medium (pH 4.0, 5 minutes, 4°C). Cells were then rinsed once more in neutral medium before incubation with radiolabeled Ang II (125I, 2000 Ci/mmol, Amersham, 100 000 cpm per well), together with 5x10-10 mol/L unlabeled Ang II, and 1 µmol/L PD 123319 in 0.3 mL binding medium (DME/F-12 containing 0.5% BSA and 0.1% bacitracin, pH 7.4) for 1 hour at 37°C. At the end of this time, wells were washed in DME/F-12 medium (4°C, three times) before cell lysis in 0.5 mol/L NaOH containing deoxycholate (0.4%). Receptor-bound radioactivity associated with the cell lysates was then determined in a gamma counter.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was accomplished with ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparison analysis.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
To confirm that the mechanism of action of elevated K+ on the H295R cell was indeed mediated through the opening of plasma membrane voltage-dependent channels, we studied the effect of K+ on [Ca2+]i in cells preloaded with fura 2 (Fig 1). Treatment with KCl (14 mmol/L) resulted in an increase in [Ca2+]i from 113±1.5 to 212±19.3 nmol/L (n=6). The initial rise in [Ca2+]i was less than that observed in response to Ang II, rising from 123.5±1.4 to 331±33.7 nmol/L (n=8). Cells were also pretreated with nifedipine (1 µmol/L) for 3 minutes, and responses to Ang II or K+ treatment were recorded. Nifedipine pretreatment abolished the response to K+, suggesting that the effects of K+ were mediated through a voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channel in the plasma membrane. The initial increase in [Ca2+]i (first 30 seconds) in response to Ang II was only partially attenuated by nifedipine (from 331±33 to 175±4 nmol/L), and the later sustained increase in [Ca2+]i was abolished (Fig 1).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Traces show effects of K+ and angiotensin II (AII) on [Ca2+]i in H295R cells. Cells preloaded with fura 2 were stimulated with K+ (14 mmol/L) or angiotensin II (10 nmol/L), and changes in [Ca2+]i were monitored at 510 nm as described in "Methods." Stimulation of cells was performed with agonist alone (A) or after pretreatment with nifedipine (1 µmol/L for 3 minutes, B). Additions were made at the times indicated by arrows. Results are representative of data obtained from three independent experiments.

Northern analysis of RNA from H295R cells treated for 20 hours with elevated K+ showed a dose-dependent reduction in mRNA level for the AT1-R (Fig 2), with half-maximal reduction in mRNA levels at 9 mmol/L K+. At this time, the maximum fall in message level was to 50% of that seen in controls, which exceeded the reduction after treatment for 20 hours with Ang II but not dbcAMP. The time dependency of the response to K+, Ang II, dbcAMP, and forskolin is shown in Fig 3. Elevated K+ promoted a fall in AT1-R mRNA level that was maximal by 12 hours, representing a slower response than that seen after Ang II, dbcAMP, or forskolin treatment. The AT1-R mRNA level remained low during prolonged treatment, similar to the level observed after treatment with dbcAMP or forskolin but not treatment with Ang II, where the message level returned to 80% of control by 24 hours.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plots shows dose dependency of decrease in angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) mRNA level in response to elevated extracellular K+ in H295R cells. Cells were treated with elevated K+ at the doses shown or with dibutyryl-cAMP (dbcAMP, 1 mmol/L) for 20 hours in serum-free medium before extraction of total RNA and Northern analysis (25 µg RNA per lane) as described in "Methods." After hybridization with the AT1-R probe (top panel), the membrane was stripped and reprobed for GAPDH (G3PDH in figure) (bottom panel) to verify loading consistency. Graphic results are from three independent experiments (mean±SEM, normalization to the level of GAPDH as described in "Methods"); *P<.05 relative to control. Autoradiographic results show representative data obtained in one of these experiments. AII indicates angiotensin II.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Line graphs show time dependency of decrease in angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) mRNA level in response to elevated extracellular K+ (14 mmol/L), angiotensin II (AII, 10 nmol/L), dibutyryl-cAMP (dbcAMP, 1 mmol/L), or forskolin (10 µmol/L) in H295R cells. Cells were treated for indicated times in serum-free medium before extraction of total RNA and Northern analysis (25 µg RNA per lane). After hybridization with the AT1-R probe, the membrane was stripped and reprobed for GAPDH to verify loading consistency (±10%). Results are normalized to the GAPDH level detected in each lane and expressed as mean±SEM of data from three independent experiments for each treatment. *P<.05 relative to control.

Having observed K+ downregulation of AT1-R mRNA levels in H295R cells, we investigated whether this was also paralleled by changes in Ang II receptors on the cell surface. Our 125I–Ang II binding assay was performed in the presence of PD 123319, making the assay specific to changes in the AT1-R only. Time-dependent changes in AT1-R binding sites in response to each treatment (Fig 4) were reminiscent of the changes in mRNA (Fig 3). Treatment with K+ resulted in a gradual but otherwise sustained decline in receptor binding, reaching a minimum level of 60% of control by 24 hours. Forskolin also promoted a sustained but otherwise greater loss in receptor binding (45% of control by 12 hours), but the effects of both K+ and forskolin contrasted to the effect of Ang II, which promoted an initial decline in receptor binding, reaching a minimum of 40% of control by 12 hours, and then returned to control levels by 24 hours.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Line graphs show time dependency of decrease in angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) level in response to elevated extracellular K+ (14 mmol/L), angiotensin II (AII, 10 nmol/L), or forskolin (10 µmol/L) in H295R cells. Cells were treated for indicated times in serum-free medium before the AT1-R–specific 125I–Ang II binding assay was performed as described. Results are mean±SEM of data from three (K+, AII) or four (forskolin) independent experiments for each treatment. *P<.05.

To confirm that K+ treatment reduced AT1-R mRNA levels by promoting the influx of extracellular Ca2+, we investigated the effect of nifedipine on this response. The reduction of AT1-R mRNA at both 4 and 20 hours in response to K+ could be fully reversed by nifedipine at 1 µmol/L (Fig 5). However, nifedipine failed to completely reverse the action of dbcAMP on AT1-R mRNA (4 or 20 hours) or the effects of Ang II (4 hours). Furthermore, the Ca2+ channel agonist Bay K8644 was able to reduce AT1-R mRNA in a dose-dependent manner, and at a maximally effective dose (1 µmol/L) AT1-R mRNA was decreased to a level comparable to that in response to K+ (data not shown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Graphs show effect of nifedipine on K+-stimulated fall in angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) mRNA levels in H295R cells. Cells were treated for 4 hours (left) or 20 hours (right) in serum-free medium in the absence (control) or presence of K+ (14 mmol/L) and nifedipine (Nif, 1 µmol/L or as indicated). Cells treated with angiotensin II (AII, 10 nmol/L) or dibutyryl-cAMP (dbcAMP, 1 mmol/L) were also included as positive controls as indicated. Total RNA extraction and Northern analysis were then performed as described in "Methods" (see also Fig 2). Results show data from two of four separate experiments.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Since the initial cloning of the AT1-R cDNA, attention has focused on the possibility that the expression of the receptor protein may be regulated at least in part at the level of the cellular mRNA. Studies on the hormonal regulation of AT1-R binding and AT1-R mRNA levels in the human H295R adrenocortical cell line6 and human adrenocortical cell primary cultures4 have shown that a decrease in message is observed in response to both Ang II and factors that activate adenylyl cyclase or otherwise promote an increase in cAMP. These findings for H295R cells6 are similar to those reported in rat kidney mesangial cells (which primarily express rat AT1a mRNA)7 but differ from those in rat adrenal, where AT1b mRNA levels increase in response to Ang II infusion, low sodium diet, or to a lesser degree high potassium diet.8 9 10 However, while putative AT1a and AT1b mRNA species have also been isolated in humans, AT1b mRNA was not detectable in human adrenal,11 and the corresponding gene has yet to be isolated.

In the adrenal gland, aldosterone formation is not only regulated by Ang II and corticotropin but also by increased circulating K+. The mechanism of action of increased K+ appears to be through the opening of voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels and thus stimulates short-term aldosterone production by a mechanism distinct from that of Ang II and corticotropin.13 The H295R cell line also exhibits an increase in aldosterone secretion in response to elevation of extracellular K+12 as well as Ang II5 or activation of adenylyl cyclase.12 We have previously shown that the effect of Ang II on AT1-R mRNA levels was fully reproduced at 4 hours by a combination of calcium ionophore (A23187) and phorbol ester but nevertheless could be partially reproduced by calcium ionophore alone.6 We therefore considered the possibility that elevation of extracellular K+, a physiological agent known to regulate calcium channel activity in adrenal cells, could also lead to alteration of AT1-R or its corresponding mRNA levels in the human adrenal cortex.

In the present study we have shown that elevation of extracellular K+ results in an increase in [Ca2+]i in H295R cells that was completely dependent on the opening of dihydropyridine-sensitive Ca2+ channels. This differed from the response to Ang II, which initially involved the more rapid release of an intracellular pool of Ca2+, followed by influx of extracellular Ca2+ through nifedipine-sensitive voltage-gated channels. In addition we also found that elevation of extracellular K+ resulted in a reduction of AT1-R mRNA levels that was both concentration dependent (half-maximal response, 9 mmol/L; maximal, 12 mmol/L) and time dependent, and the drop in AT1-R mRNA was sustained below 50% of control on prolonged treatment. This contrasts with the recovery in AT1-R message level observed on prolonged treatment with Ang II but was similar to that observed for treatment with either dbcAMP or forskolin. The mechanism of action of K+ on AT1-R mRNA appears to be mediated entirely through the Ca2+ signaling pathway, in that the effect of K+ on AT1-R mRNA was abolished by the calcium channel blocker nifedipine and could be reproduced by the calcium channel agonist Bay K8644. The action of K+ through a calcium-dependent signaling pathway alone may also explain the slower time course for the initial fall in AT1-R mRNA when compared with that seen after Ang II treatment, which would also activate the protein kinase C signaling pathway.

The time-dependent changes in AT1-R in response to K+, Ang II, and forskolin treatment, measured with a specific binding assay, confirm that the cell surface receptor apparently downregulates with only a few hours of delay behind the changes in mRNA in each case. This finding confirms that elevated K+ can alter receptor expression at the cell surface as well as at the level of mRNA and also extends our previous finding to show that whereas Ang II has little long-term effect on binding, the transient reduction in AT1-R mRNA in response to Ang II treatment is followed by a similar transient reduction in AT1-R. Thus the level of cell surface receptor appears to correlate directly with the level of AT1-R mRNA, regardless of the cell signaling pathway involved. This at least is consistent between species because in the rat adrenal an increase in AT1b mRNA in response to low sodium or high potassium diet10 is also paralleled by a corresponding increase in AT1-R, as seen by both Western analysis10 and receptor binding studies.17 18

These results, together with previously reported findings,6 lead us to conclude that in H295R adrenocortical cells, both AT1-R and its corresponding mRNA levels are controlled through three distinct signaling pathways, namely, protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and a Ca2+-dependent signaling pathway. These findings may indicate why in many mammalian species the AT1-R density is reduced in the zona fasciculata/reticularis relative to the zona glomerulosa.19 20 21 The finding that long-term treatment with elevated K+ as well as agents that activate adenylyl cyclase brings about a sustained reduction in AT1-R expression further suggests that physiological agents that can stimulate aldosterone secretion independently of the renin-angiotensin system may be able to selectively desensitize the adrenal zona glomerulosa to Ang II in humans. Furthermore, since Ang II action on adrenocortical cells is also known to attenuate expression of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase,22 23 24 25 the consequence of AT1-R downregulation may be an increase in 17{alpha}-hydroxylase expression and so further development of zona fasciculata function, with corresponding cortisol secretory capacity.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK 43140 to W.E.R.), the American Heart Association, Texas Affiliate (93R-082 to W.E.R.), and Merck Sharp & Dohme. I.M.B. was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Training Grant No. T32-HD-07190.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr W.E. Rainey, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235-9032.

Received October 26, 1994; first decision November 16, 1994; accepted March 8, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Wong PC, Price WA Jr, Chiu AT, Carini DJ, Duncia JV, Johnson AL, Wexler RR, Timmermans PBMWM. Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists: studies with EXP9270 and DuP 753. Hypertension. 1990;15:823-834. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Inagami T, Harris RC. Molecular insights into angiotensin II receptor subtypes. News Physiol Sci. 1993;8:215-218. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Sandberg K. Structural analysis and regulation of angiotensin II receptors. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1994;5:28-35.
  4. Naville D, Lebrethon MC, Kermabon AY, Rouer E, Benarous R, Saez JM. Characterisation and regulation of angiotensin II type-1 receptor (binding and mRNA) in human adrenal fasciculata reticularis cells. FEBS Lett. 1993;312:776-782.
  5. Bird IM, Hanley NA, Word AR, Mathis JM, McCarthy JL, Mason JI, Rainey WE. Human NCI-H295 adrenocortical carcinoma cells: a model for angiotensin II-responsive aldosterone secretion. Endocrinology. 1993;133:1555-1561. [Abstract]
  6. Bird IM, Mason JI, Rainey WE. Regulation of type 1 angiotensin II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in human adrenocortical carcinoma H295 cells. Endocrinology. 1994;134:2468-2474. [Abstract]
  7. Makita N, Iwai N, Inagami T, Badr KF. Two distinct pathways in the down-regulation of type-1 angiotensin II receptor gene in rat glomerular mesangial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;185:142-146. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Iwai N, Inagami T. Regulation of the expression of rat angiotensin II receptor mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;182:1094-1099. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Iwai N, Inagami T, Ohmichi N, Nakamura Y, Saeki Y, Kinoshita M. Differential regulation of rat AT1a and AT1b receptor mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;188:298-303. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Lehoux JG, Bird IM, Rainey WE, Tremblay A, DuCharme L. Both low sodium and high potassium intake increase the level of adrenal angiotensin-II receptor type 1, but not that of adrenocorticotropin receptor. Endocrinology. 1994;134:776-782. [Abstract]
  11. Konishi H, Kuroda S, Inada Y, Fujisawa Y. Novel subtype of human angiotensin II type 1 receptor: cDNA cloning and expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;199:467-474. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Rainey WE, Bird IM, Mason JI. The NCI-H295 cell line: a pluripotent model for human adrenocortical studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1994;100:45-50. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Quinn SJ, Williams GH. Regulation of aldosterone secretion. In: James VHT, ed. The Adrenal Gland. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1992:159-189.
  14. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440-3450. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Tsien RY, Pozzan T, Rink TJ. Calcium homeostasis in intact lymphocytes: cytoplasmic free calcium monitored with a new intracellularly trapped fluorescent indicator. J Cell Biol. 1982;94:325-334. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Taylor DA, Stull JT. Calcium dependency of myosin light chain phosphorylation in smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1988;263:14456-14462. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Douglas JG. Effects of high potassium diet on angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin-induced aldosterone production in rat adrenal glomerulosa cells. Endocrinology. 1980;106:983-990. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Aguillera G, Hauger RL, Catt KJ. Control of aldosterone secretion during sodium restriction: adrenal receptor regulation and increased adrenal sensitivity to angiotensin II. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978;75:975-979. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chiu AT, Herblin WF, McCall DE, Ardecky RJ, Carini DJ, Duncia JV, Pease LJ, Wong PC, Wexler RR, Johnson AL, Timmermans PBMWM. Identification of angiotensin II receptor subtypes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;165:196-203. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Himeno A, Nazarali AJ, Saavedra JM. Quantitative in vitro autoradiographic characterization of [125I]angiotensin II binding sites in rat adrenal gland. Regul Pept. 1988;23:127-133. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Paxton WG, Runge M, Horaist C, Cohen C, Alexander RW, Bernstaein KE. Immunohistochemical localization of rat angiotensin II AT1 receptor. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F989-F995. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rainey WE, Oka K, Magness RR, Mason JI. Ovine fetal adrenal synthesis of cortisol: regulation by ACTH, angiotensin II and transforming growth factor beta. Endocrinology. 1991;129:1784-1790. [Abstract]
  23. Bird IM, Magness RR, Mason JI, Rainey WE. Angiotensin-II acts via the type 1 receptor to inhibit 17{alpha}-hydroxylase cytochrome P450 expression in ovine adrenocortical cells. Endocrinology. 1992;130:3113-3121. [Abstract]
  24. Mason JI, Bird IM, Rainey WE. Regulation of adrenal 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{Delta}5->4-isomerase and P45017 {alpha}-hydroxylase expression. In: Saez JM, Brownie AC, Capponi A, Chambaz EM, Mantero F, eds. Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Adrenal Cortex. Colloque INSERM/John Libbey Eurotext Ltd; 1992;222:111-122.
  25. Bakke M, Lund J. A novel 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-responsive sequence in the bovine CYP17 gene is a target of negative regulation by protein kinase C. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:1323-1331.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. Peters, P. Teubner, S. Clausmeyer, T. Puschner, C. Maser-Gluth, H.-J. Wrede, B. Kranzlin, and J. Peters
StAR expression and the long-term aldosterone response to high-potassium diet in Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2007; 292(1): E16 - E23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
D. G. Romero, M. W. Plonczynski, E. P. Gomez-Sanchez, L. L. Yanes, and C. E. Gomez-Sanchez
RGS2 Is Regulated by Angiotensin II and Functions as a Negative Feedback of Aldosterone Production in H295R Human Adrenocortical Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2006; 147(8): 3889 - 3897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. SPAT and L. HUNYADY
Control of Aldosterone Secretion: A Model for Convergence in Cellular Signaling Pathways
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2004; 84(2): 489 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Nickenig and D. G. Harrison
The AT1-Type Angiotensin Receptor in Oxidative Stress and Atherogenesis: Part II: AT1 Receptor Regulation
Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105(4): 530 - 536.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
B. J. Clark and R. Combs
Angiotensin II and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Induce Human Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Transcription through a Common Steroidogenic Factor-1 Element
Endocrinology, October 1, 1999; 140(10): 4390 - 4398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. M. Bird, D. S. Millican, and R. R. Magness
Specific Pregnancy-Induced Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Expression in Ovine Uterine Artery Does Not Involve Formation of Alternate Splice Variants or Alternate Promoter Usage
Biol Reprod, August 1, 1998; 59(2): 219 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. P. Rossi, G. Albertin, S. Bova, A. S. Belloni, F. Fallo, U. Pagotto, L. Trevisi, G. Palu, A. C. Pessina, and G. G. Nussdorfer
Autocrine-Paracrine Role of Endothelin-1 in the Regulation of Aldosterone Synthase Expression and Intracellular Ca2+ in Human Adrenocortical Carcinoma NCI-H295 Cells
Endocrinology, October 1, 1997; 138(10): 4421 - 4426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
C. Schmid, H. Castrop, J. Reitbauer, R. Della Bruna, and A. Kurtz
Dietary Salt Intake Modulates Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Gene Expression
Hypertension, April 1, 1997; 29(4): 923 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
I. M. Bird, J. Zheng, J. M. Cale, and R. R. Magness
Pregnancy Induces an Increase in Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Expression in Uterine But Not Systemic Artery Endothelium
Endocrinology, January 1, 1997; 138(1): 490 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bird, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bird, I. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rainey, W. E.