Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;25:1161-1166

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Stjernquist, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Stjernquist, M.

(Hypertension. 1995;25:1161-1166.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Effects of Head-Down Tilt on Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and the Renin System in Pregnancy

Hedvig Poulsen; Per Olofsson; Martin Stjernquist

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We studied the effects of head-down tilt to 10° for 30 minutes on plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and the renin-aldosterone system in 8 preeclamptic pregnant women, 8 healthy pregnant women, and 11 nonpregnant women of fertile age. Mean arterial blood pressure did not change in the pregnant groups but increased significantly in the nonpregnant control subjects. Heart rate decreased significantly in preeclamptic women but remained unchanged in both control groups. Baseline atrial natriuretic peptide concentration was significantly higher in both preeclamptic (66±4 pmol/L) and pregnant (54±6 pmol/L) control subjects compared with nonpregnant subjects (40±2 pmol/L), but the difference between the pregnant groups was not significant. Head-down tilting induced a significant increase in atrial natriuretic peptide only in healthy pregnant women. Baseline plasma renin activity and aldosterone concentrations were significantly higher in pregnant control subjects compared with both the preeclamptic and nonpregnant groups. The differences between the preeclamptic and nonpregnant control groups were nonsignificant. After head-down tilting, plasma renin activity decreased significantly only in nonpregnant control subjects, whereas aldosterone decreased significantly in preeclamptic and nonpregnant control subjects. In preeclampsia, atrial natriuretic peptide release followed blood pressure and not changes in cardiac output. When all 27 women were studied, a correlation between atrial natriuretic peptide and mean arterial pressure was found in the left lateral supine position. The results suggest that pregnant women developing preeclampsia lose their usual hemodynamic control and show reactions resembling the nonpregnant state when subjected to head-down tilt.


Key Words: pregnancy • preeclampsia • posture • atrial natriuretic peptide • renin • aldosterone


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is activated in healthy pregnancy,1 2 with a significantly increased plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone concentration already at 8 weeks of pregnancy.3 A marked depression of pressor responsiveness to infused angiotensin II (Ang II) in healthy pregnancy was first demonstrated by Abdul-Karim and Assali in 1961.4 On the other hand, women whose pregnancies are complicated by hypertension often have decreased PRA and aldosterone concentrations and have lost refractoriness to Ang II, sometimes being as sensitive to infused Ang II as nonpregnant individuals.5

Because of a modified action of the RAAS, weaker vasopressor stimuli may lead to stronger responses in preeclamptic compared with normotensive pregnancy. Part of this response may be a modified action of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), which is an RAAS antagonist. ANP acts as a blood volume regulatory hormone, involved in the control of water and sodium excretion, blood pressure (BP), vascular resistance, hemoconcentration, and vasopressin secretion.6 7 8 9 ANP has vasorelaxant properties on preconstricted vascular smooth muscle in vitro, for example, after preconstriction by Ang II.10 11 Studies on plasma ANP in normotensive pregnancy have shown a significant increase in midpregnancy12 and late pregnancy,13 a nonsignificant increase,14 or an unchanged concentration.15 There is general agreement that ANP levels are elevated in preeclamptic compared with normotensive pregnancies,13 indicating an altered role of ANP in preeclampsia.

ANP is synthesized in cardiac myocytes, predominantly in the right atrium. Stretching of the myocytes, for example by vascular volume expansion, increased BP, increased sodium intake, or heart arrhythmia, stimulates cytoplasmatic granula to release ANP to the blood.16 In healthy normotensive individuals, physiological concentrations of ANP induce diuresis,17 but higher concentrations are necessary to decrease BP.18 However, after activation of the RAAS, ANP acts as a potent natriuretic and hypotensive agent.19 20

The hemodynamic effects of head-down tilting, as recommended by Trendelenburg in 1870 to facilitate suprapubic cystostomy,21 have been investigated in nonpregnant healthy women as well as in hypertensive individuals. Head-down tilting for 30 minutes induces an increase in cardiopulmonary blood volume that is equal in nonpregnant hypertensive and healthy individuals.22

To our knowledge, the effects of head-down tilting—an increase in central venous blood volume followed by an increase in cardiac filling and ANP release—have not previously been studied in pregnancy. Head-up tilting results in a significant decrease in plasma ANP in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women23 and nonpregnant women.24 Most likely, this is due to a reduction in central venous blood volume and right atrial pressure. Short-term intravenous volume expansion in normotensive human pregnancy causes an enhanced ANP response compared with the nonpregnant state,25 and in preeclamptic pregnancy the response is exaggerated compared with normotensive pregnancy.26 Changes in ANP concentration appear to be related to changes in maternal central hemodynamics,27 although during basal conditions there seem to be no correlations between ANP and atrial size.12

The related effects of BP, the RAAS, and ANP after postural stimuli remain unclear in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy. Our hypothesis was that head-down tilting to 10° (H-D10°) for 30 minutes would increase the blood volume of the right atrium and cause an exaggerated release of ANP in preeclamptic compared with normotensive pregnancy. We also wanted to reveal whether there is a different interaction between ANP and the RAAS at rest compared with during postural provocation.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Eight pregnant women with preeclampsia (23 to 31 years; gestational age, 27 to 40 weeks), 8 healthy pregnant women (21 to 33 years; gestational age, 28 to 42 weeks), and 11 healthy nonpregnant women (17 to 43 years) were included in the study. The parity in the nonpregnant group was 6 nullipara and 5 parous women; in the pregnant control group, 4 nullipara and 4 parous women; and in the preeclamptic group, 6 nullipara, 1 para I, and 1 para III. None of the women had a history of renal disease or hypertension. The preeclamptic women were admitted 1 to 2 days before the investigation and received no medication. All pregnant women had a normal outcome of pregnancy. Preeclampsia was defined as BP greater than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg, measured two times with an interval of 6 hours, and proteinuria greater than 1+ semiquantitatively measured by urinary dipsticks after 24 weeks of pregnancy.

After an overnight fast, usual hospital breakfasts and lunches were served; then, no more food or drinking was allowed during the investigation. The subjects remained in bed during the investigation, and blood samples were drawn between noon and 2 PM.

After women had been 30 minutes in the left lateral recumbent (LLR) position, blood samples were drawn for analyses of ANP, PRA, aldosterone, electrolytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit. A second series of blood samples was collected after a further 30 minutes of H-D10° with the head resting on a small pillow. This position was in no case accompanied by discomfort or signs of cranial congestion. Heart rate and BP were monitored with an automatic sphygmomanometer (Auto BP Monitor, EME Ltd) on the left upper arm, with the cuff positioned at the level of the heart. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as Diastolic BP+1/3(Systolic BP–Diastolic BP). All women involved in the study were informed in detail about the investigation and its purpose and gave their consent to participate. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Lund.

Chemical Analyses
For determination of PRA and aldosterone concentrations, venous whole blood was collected in EDTA-prepared glass tubes. For ANP determination, the tubes also contained the enzyme inhibitor Trasylol. The tubes were immediately put on ice and centrifuged at room temperature, and the plasma was stored at -50°C until analyzed.

Radioimmunoassay
Radioimmunoassay of ANP was performed at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Section of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Mölndal Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. The samples were analyzed in serial dilutions optimized to the linear part of the standard curve and corrected for nonspecific binding. Immunoreactive {alpha}-human ANP was measured with the use of a rabbit antiserum (A93, Milab) in a final dilution of 1:24 000. The antiserum showed a 100% cross-reactivity with {alpha}-human ANP-(7-28) and rat {alpha}-ANP and less than 0.1% with {alpha}-human ANP-(1-11) and {alpha}-human ANP-(18-28). The detection limit was 10 pmol/L, and the interassay coefficient of variation was less than 10%.28 PRA and aldosterone concentrations were routinely analyzed by radioimmunoassay at the Endocrine Laboratory at Malmö General Hospital.

Statistical Analyses
Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was used for matched paired samples, and Scheffé's multiple range test was used for comparison between multiple groups. Simple linear regression was used for correlation between two variables. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant. All values are expressed in SI units.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The Table shows changes in different variables after 30 minutes in the LLR position compared with after 30 minutes of H-D10°.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Changes in Study Parameters From Left Lateral Recumbent Position to Head-Down Tilt to 10° in Nonpregnant, Healthy Pregnant, and Preeclamptic Pregnant Women

MAP, Heart Rate, Hemoglobin, and Hematocrit
There were no significant changes in MAP, systolic BP, or diastolic BP in the pregnant groups during rest in the LLR position or during H-D10° tilting (Fig 1). In nonpregnant women, MAP first decreased and then increased (P=.05) during the last 10 minutes in the LLR position; after the change to H-D10°, MAP rose significantly during the last 20 minutes.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Line graph shows mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) measured every 10 minutes in preeclamptic (n=8), healthy pregnant (n=8), and nonpregnant (n=11) women. Values are mean±SEM. Between 0 and 30 minutes, women were placed in the left lateral recumbent position, and between 30 and 60 minutes in head-down tilt to 10° (H-D 10, denoted by box). *P>.05.

During the first 10 minutes of H-D10°, heart rate in the preeclamptic group fell significantly to 78±3 beats per minute and then further to 73±3 beats per minute during the last 20 minutes (Fig 2). No significant changes were found in the control groups.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Line graph shows heart rate measured every 10 minutes in preeclamptic (n=8), healthy pregnant (n=8), and nonpregnant (n=11) women. Values are mean±SEM. Between 0 and 30 minutes, women were placed in the left lateral recumbent position, and between 30 and 60 minutes in head-down tilt to 10° (denoted by box). *P>.05.

Both hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower (P=NS) in pregnancy, with the lowest values observed in the healthy pregnant group (Table).

Atrial Natriuretic Peptide
Resting (basal) plasma ANP concentration was significantly higher in the healthy pregnant (54±6 pmol/L) and preeclamptic (66±4 pmol/L) groups compared with the nonpregnant group (40±2 pmol/L) (Fig 3, left). The difference between the normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women was not significant. After 30 minutes of H-D10°, ANP increased significantly (58±6 pmol/L) in the normotensive pregnant group, but no changes were found in the other two groups (Fig 3, left). When all studied women were pooled (n=27), a correlation (r=.57) was found between baseline MAP and ANP concentration after 30 minutes of the LLR position (Fig 4).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bar graphs show plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP, left), plasma renin activity (PRA, middle), and plasma concentrations of aldosterone (right) in nonpregnant (n=11), healthy pregnant (n=8), and preeclamptic (n=8) women after 30 minutes in the left lateral recumbent position (white bars) and after 30 minutes in head-down tilt to 10° (black bars). *P<.05.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Scatterplot shows plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) plotted against mean arterial pressure (MAP) after 30 minutes of the supine position for the entire study group (n=27). Linear regression according to the method of least squares showed a correlation between ANP and MAP.

Plasma Renin Activity
Resting PRA was significantly higher in the normotensive pregnant group (6.11±0.81 µg/L per hour) compared with nonpregnant (1.43±0.22 µg/L per hour) and preeclamptic (2.92±0.61 µg/L per hour) women (Fig 3, middle). After H-D10°, PRA decreased significantly in the nonpregnant women to 1.10±0.18 µg/L per hour.

Aldosterone
Aldosterone concentration at rest was significantly higher in the normotensive pregnant group (1.27±0.24 nmol/L) compared with both the nonpregnant (0.31± 0.03 nmol/L) and preeclamptic (0.52±0.09 nmol/L) groups (Fig 3, right). After H-D10°, aldosterone concentrations decreased in all three groups, although significantly only in the nonpregnant and preeclamptic groups.

PRA-ANP and Aldosterone-ANP Ratios
PRA-ANP and aldosterone-ANP ratios are shown in the Table. Both ratios were significantly higher in normotensive pregnant women compared with nonpregnant and preeclamptic women. In preeclamptic women, the PRA-ANP ratio but not the aldosterone-ANP ratio was significantly higher than in the nonpregnant women. During H-D10°, the PRA-ANP ratio decreased significantly in nonpregnant women (26%) but not in pregnant women (0.5%) or preeclamptic women (7%). The aldosterone-ANP ratio declined significantly after H-D10° in the preeclamptic group (24%) but not in the normotensive pregnant group (19%).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
First, this study confirmed previous reports that PRA and aldosterone are significantly elevated in normotensive pregnant women in their third trimester compared with nonpregnant women but are downregulated to nearly nonpregnant values in pregnancies complicated by hypertension.1 2 Second, our results support previous studies reporting a significantly higher ANP concentration in both normotensive and preeclamptic women compared with nonpregnant women.13 14 23 Last, the present study demonstrated that H-D10° for 30 minutes increased ANP concentration significantly in normotensive third-trimester pregnant women but not in nonpregnant or preeclamptic pregnant women.

To explain the activation of the fourfold to fivefold increase in PRA and aldosterone in normotensive pregnancy, the underfill hypothesis has been proposed.29 In the pregnant baboon, the RAAS is activated weeks before any increase in plasma volume is observed.30 Vascular resistance also decreases before plasma volume expands. A hitherto unidentified vasodilator mechanism is probably activated very early in pregnancy, and RAAS activation might be interpreted as a normal physiological response to counteract hypotension and maintain BP. ANP might represent one of the mechanisms responsible for vasodilation. The relationship between vascular reactivity and ANP suggests that ANP plays a role in the development of low peripheral vascular resistance in pregnancy.31 In addition, the pregnant woman is protected against the potential hypertensive effects of Ang II by vascular refractoriness from as early as 11 weeks of gestation, at the same time as adrenal sensitivity is maintained.32

In preeclamptic women, who often exhibit a low plasma volume, one would expect low ANP levels. Paradoxically, this and other studies13 23 have demonstrated high ANP levels, indicating that the normal balance between ANP and plasma volume is lost in preeclamptic pregnancy. Instead of causing short-term changes of plasma volume, the primary aim of an ANP response might be to counteract the hypertension and vasospasm. This theory is supported by the demonstrated correlation between ANP and MAP in this and other studies.33 The reduced plasma volume may then be interpreted as a secondary side effect caused by increased ANP release. In the present study there was no evidence for any short-term changes in plasma volume, since hemoglobin and hematocrit were not significantly increased (Table). Hence, we were not able to confirm previous reports stating that ANP increases capillary permeability.34

The responses of aldosterone (decrease) and ANP (no change) after H-D10° were similar in the nonpregnant and preeclamptic groups, and the responses of PRA (decrease, P=NS) were similar in the two pregnant groups. Hence, in normotensive pregnancy, ANP might be controlled by mechanisms other than in nonpregnant individuals and in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia. Another possibility is that the normotensive pregnant woman might be less sensitive to ANP. This might then be a phenomenon similar to the reduced sensitivity mentioned above to Ang II in normotensive pregnancy.5 A lower sensitivity for ANP in normotensive pregnancy might also explain why high levels of ANP are present at the same time as renin and aldosterone increase fivefold to sixfold.

The lack of ANP response after H-D10° tilting in the preeclamptic group is in contrast with previous studies showing an exaggerated ANP release after intravenous volume expansion.26 As in the normotensive pregnant group, an increase in ANP was expected. However, if changes of the RAAS are also taken into account, there is a possible explanation. The changes of the PRA-ANP ratio were not different after tilting in the two pregnant groups. The PRA-ANP ratio decreased by 0.5% (P=NS) in the pregnant group and by 7% (P=NS) in the preeclamptic group, compared with a 25% decrease in the nonpregnant group. Therefore, instead of an increased ANP release, preeclamptic women responded to head-down tilt by a downregulation of PRA, maintaining approximately the same balance between PRA and ANP as healthy pregnant women. However, the balance between aldosterone and ANP in preeclampsia was not maintained compared with normotensive pregnancy. The aldosterone-ANP ratio decreased by 23% (P<.01) in the nonpregnant group, by 19% (P=NS) in the normotensive pregnant group, and by 24% (P<.05) in the preeclamptic group. A lack of correlation between aldosterone and ANP has previously been demonstrated in normotensive pregnancy.35

These results suggested a defective link between PRA and aldosterone in preeclampsia. One reason might be a depletion of angiotensin-converting enzyme stores. We did not measure Ang II or angiotensin-converting enzyme in the present study, but it is known that angiotensin-converting enzyme activity is depressed in pregnancy compared with the nonpregnant state.36 It is probable that activation of the RAAS with excessive conversion of Ang II depletes angiotensin-converting enzyme stores. Angiotensin-converting enzyme might therefore be a rate-limiting factor of RAAS activity in pregnancy.

Although the balance between PRA and ANP was maintained during tilting in the preeclamptic group, the reason for the lack of ANP response is obscure. In accordance with our hypothesis, we had expected a significant increase of ANP concentration in preeclampsia with head-down tilting. One explanation might be that the 10° tilting was too small to imitate a volume load. Another possibility is that the release of ANP from cardiocyte granula was already close to an absolute maximum and the myocytes could not respond to stretching by any accelerated release of ANP. This exhaustion theory remains to be proved.

We have not been able to find any other studies comparing RAAS activation and ANP release during head-down tilting in pregnancy. Comparisons must therefore be restricted to nonpregnant individuals regarding head-down tilting and pregnant individuals regarding head-up tilting. Head-down tilting in normotensive and hypertensive men causes a significant decrease of PRA in both groups although no changes in aldosterone in hypertensive individuals.37 In the present study, nonpregnant women showed the same reactions as previously demonstrated in healthy men, whereas pregnant women maintained their PRA concentration. In contrast to hypertensive men, preeclamptic women showed a significant decrease of aldosterone with head-down tilting.

Changes of RAAS activity would be expected to cause changes of BP if not counteracted. In the two pregnant groups BP remained unchanged during the 30 minutes of H-D10°. A significant change in BP was found only in the nonpregnant group. This was observed in connection with a downregulation of the RAAS and unchanged ANP. Most likely, the stimulus from head-down tilting was not strong enough to imitate a volume load and increase BP in the pregnant groups. Hence, in normotensive pregnancy, ANP release seems to depend on blood volume changes. In preeclampsia, ANP release depends instead on an increase in BP.

In the preeclamptic group, heart rate fell significantly after 10 minutes and again after 30 minutes of H-D10°. This indicates that preeclamptic women primarily reduce cardiac output by decreasing heart rate and that BP is rather resistant to changes in posture. Hence, ANP release in preeclampsia did not change with changes in cardiac output.

In summary, H-D10° for 30 minutes resulted in significantly elevated plasma ANP in normotensive pregnant women that was not accompanied by any changes in PRA, aldosterone, MAP, or heart rate. In contrast, preeclamptic women partly seemed to overcome the increased central blood volume load induced by the head-down tilt position by decreasing heart rate and aldosterone, whereas BP, ANP, and PRA were not significantly changed. In the preeclamptic group as well as in the nonpregnant control group, the response to increased cardiac preload seemed to be downregulation of the RAAS. A significant negative correlation between PRA and ANP responses was found in the normotensive and preeclamptic pregnant groups, but between aldosterone and ANP responses, only in normotensive pregnancy. In normotensive pregnancy, ANP release seemed to depend on blood volume. In preeclampsia the ANP release followed BP and not changes in cardiac output. These results indicate that in women whose pregnancies are complicated by preeclampsia, normal hemodynamic control is lost, with reactions to head-down tilting similar to those in nonpregnant individuals.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Hedvig Poulsen, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, MAS, S-214 01 Malmö, Sweden.

Received June 23, 1994; first decision July 27, 1994; accepted January 24, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Hjertbjerg R, Belfrage P, Brenne K, Eneroth P. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in pregnancy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1991;B10:385-399.
  2. Fagundes VG, Lamas CC, Francischetti EA. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normal and hypertensive pregnancy: response to postural stimuli. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl II):II-74-II-78.
  3. Wilson M, Morganti AO, Zervoudakis I, Letcher RL, Romney BM, von Oeyon P, Papera S, Sealey JF, Laragh JH. Blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system and sex steroids throughout normal pregnancy. Am J Med. 1980;68:97-104. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Abdul-Karim R, Assali NS. Pressor response to angiotonin in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;82:246-251. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Gant NF, Daley GL, Chand S, Whalley PJ, MacDonald PC. A study of angiotensin II pressor response throughout primigravid pregnancy. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:2682-2689.
  6. deBold AJ. Tissue fractionation studies on the relationship between an atrial natriuretic factor and specific atrial granules. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1982;60:324-330. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Goetz K. Physiology and pathophysiology of atrial peptides. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:E1-E15. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Olsson K, Dahlborn K, Nygren K, Karlberg BE, Andén NE, Eriksson L. Fluid balance and arterial blood pressure during intracarotid infusions of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) in water-deprived goats. Acta Physiol Scand. 1989;137:249-257. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Grandis DJ, Uretsky BF, Ray SM, Vassilaros L, Verbalis JG, Puschett JB. Differential effects of atrial natriuretic peptide infusion at physiological doses in different postures in humans. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:219-227. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kleinert HD, Maack T, Atlas S, Januszewicz A, Sealey JE, Laragh JH. Atrial natriuretic factor inhibits angiotensin-, norepinephrine-, and potassium-induced vascular contractility. Hypertension. 1984;6(suppl I):I-143-I-147.
  11. Poulsen H, Sjöberg N-O, Stjernquist M, Zia E. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) antagonizes the contractile effect of angiotensin II in human uterine artery. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1939-1943. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Steegers EA, van Lakwijk HP, Fast HJ, Jongsma HW, Eskes TK, Symonds EM, Hein PR. Atrial natriuretic peptide and atrial size during normal pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:202-206. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Malee MP, Malee KM, Azuma SD, Taylor RN, Roberts JM. Increases in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide concentration antedate clinical evidence of preeclampsia. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74:1095-1100.
  14. Mikkelsen AL, Schütten G, Asping U, Schütten HJ. Changes in plasma concentration of ANP and aldosterone in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by pre-eclampsia. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1991;18:185-189. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Thomsen JK, Fogh-Andersen N, Jaszczak P, Giese J. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) decrease during normal pregnancy as related to hemodynamic changes and volume regulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72:103-110. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Goetz KL. Atrial receptors, natriuretic peptides, and the kidney: current understanding. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:600-603. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Cuneo RC, Espiner EA, Nicholls MG, Yandle TG, Livesey JH. Effects of physiological levels of atrial natriuretic peptide on hormone secretion: inhibition of angiotensin-induced aldosteronesecretion and renin release in normal man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1987;65:765-772. [Abstract]
  18. Weidmann P, Hasler L, Gnädinger M, Lang RE, Uehlinger DE, Shaw S, Rascher W, Reubi FC. Blood levels and renal effects of atrial peptide in normal man. J Clin Invest. 1986;77:734-742.
  19. Atlas SA, Volpe M, Sosa RE, Laragh JH, Camargo MJF, Maack T. Effects of atrial natriuretic factor on blood pressure and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Fed Proc. 1986;45:2115-2121. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kivlighin SD, Loheimer TE, Yang HM, Shin Y. Chronic effects of a physiological dose of ANP on arterial pressure and renin release. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:H1491-H1497. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Karnad DR, Tembulkar P, Abraham P, Desai NK. Head down tilt as a physiological diuretic in normal controls and in patients with fluid-retaining states. Lancet. 1987;2:525-528. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. London GM, Levenson JA, Safar ME, Simon AC, Guerin AP, Payen D. Hemodynamic effects of head-down tilt in normal subjects and sustained hypertensive patients. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:H194-H202.
  23. Lowe SA, Zammit VC, Mitar D, Macdonald GJ, Brown MA. Atrial natriuretic peptide and plasma volume in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:897-903. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Matzen S, Knigge U, Schutten HJ, Secher NH. Atrial natriuretic peptide during head-up tilt induced hypovolaemic shock in man. Acta Physiol Scand. 1990;140:161-166. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Lowe SA, Macdonald G, Brown MA. Acute and chronic regulation of atrial natriuretic peptide in human pregnancy: a longitudinal study. J Hypertens. 1992;10:821-829. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Nisell H, Carlstrom K, Cizinzky S, Grunewald C, Nylund L, Randma I. Atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations and hemodynamic effects of acute plasma volume expansion in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:902-907. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Milsom I, Hedner J, Hedner T. Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and maternal hemodynamic changes during normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67:717-722. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Ekholm D, Edvinsson L, Ekman R, Thulin T. Plasma atrial natri-uretic peptide (ANP) in relation to blood pressure in severe hypertension. J Intern Med. 1992;231:281-285. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Schrier RW, Briner VA. Peripheral arterial vasodilatation hypothesis of sodium and water retention in pregnancy: implications for pathogenesis of preeclampsia-eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:632-639. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Phippard AF, Horvath JS, Glynn EM, Garner MG, Fletcher PJ, Duggin GG, Tiller DJ. Circulatory adaptation to pregnancy: serial studies of haemodynamics, blood volume, renin and aldosterone in the baboon (Papio hamadryas). J Hypertens. 1986;4:773-779. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Sowers JR, Zemel MB, Walsh MF, Standley PR, Zemel PC, Bronsteen RA, Kraniak J, Sokol RJ. Effects of normal pregnancy on cellular cation metabolism and peripheral vascular resistance. Am J Hypertens. 1990;3:16-22. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Brown MA, Pipkin FB, Symonds EM. The effects of intravenous angiotensin II upon blood pressure and sodium and urate excretion in human pregnancy. J Hypertens. 1988;6:457-464. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Fievet P, Fournier A, de Bold A, El Esper N, Gregoire I, Westeel PF, Renaud H, Makdassi R. Atrial natriuretic factor in pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia: increased plasma concentrations possibly explaining these hypovolemic states with paradoxical hyporeninism. Am J Hypertens. 1988;1:16-21. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Huxley VH, Tucker VL, Verburg KM, Freeman RH. Increased capillary hydraulic conductivity induced by atrial natriuretic peptide. Circ Res. 1987;60:304-307. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Voto LS, Hetmanski DJ, Broughton Pipkin F. Determinants of fetal and maternal atrial natriuretic peptide concentrations at delivery in man. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;97:1123-1129. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Oats JN, Pipkin FB, Symonds EM. Angiotensin-converting enzyme and the renin-angiotensin system in normotensive primigravid pregnancy. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1982;B1:73-91.
  37. London GM, Levenson JA, Safar ME, Simon AC, Guerin AP, Payen D. Hemodynamic effects of head-down tilt in normal subjects and sustained hypertensive patients. Am J Physiol. 1983;245:H194-H202.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
M. Bahar, M. Chanimov, M. L. Cohen, M. Friedland, Y. Grinshpon, R. Brenner, I. Shul, R. Datsky, and D. J. Sherman
Lateral recumbent head-down posture for epidural catheter insertion reduces intravascular injection
Can J Anesth, January 1, 2001; 48(1): 48 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Stjernquist, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poulsen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Stjernquist, M.