Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;26:425-431

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saruta, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saruta, T.

(Hypertension. 1995;26:425-431.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Differential Modulation of Baroreceptor Sensitivity by Long-term Antihypertensive Treatment

Presented in part at the 8th International Symposium on SHR and Related Studies, Osaka, Japan, October 18-20, 1994, and published in abstract form (Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1994[suppl 1]:S30).

Masashi Ichikawa; Hiromichi Suzuki; Kazuhiro Kumagai; Hiroo Kumagai; Munekazu Ryuzaki; Masahiko Nishizawa; Takao Saruta

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Correspondence to Takao Saruta, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University, School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160, Japan.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract We investigated the effects of long-term oral treatment with four different classes of antihypertensive drugs (a thiazide diuretic [trichlormethiazide, 10 mg/kg per day]; a ß-blocker [atenolol, 90 mg/kg per day]; a calcium channel antagonist [nicardipine, 150 mg/kg per day]; and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [enalapril maleate, 10 mg/kg per day]) on aortic baroreceptor activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats with chronic hypertension (36 weeks of age). Treatment with each of the four drugs, given from 10 to 36 weeks of age, similarly decreased arterial pressure (171±2 to 144±1 mm Hg, P<.01) and similarly decreased the threshold pressure for baroreceptors (116±3 to 103±1 mm Hg, P<.05). The four antihypertensive drugs also potentiated the maximal gain of the pressure-activity relation in these rats (untreated, 1.08±0.05% maximum/mm Hg); however, nicardipine and enalapril (1.77±0.04% and 1.70±0.06% maximum/mm Hg, respectively) augmented the maximal gain to a greater extent (P<.05 to .01) than did trichlormethiazide or atenolol (1.49±0.05% and 1.42±0.02% maximum/mm Hg, respectively). When the initiation of treatment was delayed to 28 weeks of age, no differences were found in the effects on either threshold pressure (104±1 mm Hg) or maximal gain (1.36±0.03% maximum/mm Hg) for all four drugs. These findings suggest that in the treatment of chronic hypertension (1) baroreceptor resetting to a lower pressure level is similarly induced with the four drugs, and (2) baroreceptor sensitivity is augmented more by early and long-term treatment with calcium channel antagonists or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors than by diuretics or ß-blockers.


Key Words: pressoreceptors • rats, inbred SHR • angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors • calcium channel blockers • diuretics • adrenergic beta antagonists • aorta


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hypertension has been associated with impaired baroreceptor function, which leads to a disturbance of control in the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. This impairment is already present in the early phase of hypertension1 2 3 when chronic structural changes are induced less by hypertension in the aorta and carotid sinuses, in which the baroreceptors are situated.2 4 5 We have recently demonstrated that in young hypertensive SHR (10 weeks of age) 2 weeks of antihypertensive treatment (from 8 to 10 weeks of age) with four different classes of drugs (a thiazide diuretic, a ß-blocker, a calcium channel antagonist, and an ACE inhibitor) similarly potentiated baroreceptor function, suggesting that the BP reduction by itself (as opposed to specific actions of the drugs) may directly potentiate the function of the baroreceptor.3

During the development and progression of hypertension several structural alterations, such as medial hypertrophy and endothelial damage, occur in the vessel wall.4 5 These vascular structural changes are associated with the altered function of the vessel, which may have substantial effects on baroreceptor activity.6 7 Moreover, a number of studies conducted to examine the effects of antihypertensive treatment on vascular properties have revealed differences among several antihypertensive drugs in their ability to improve vascular structure and function.8 9 10 11 12 We inferred that in the chronic stage of hypertension the modulation of baroreceptor activity in response to antihypertensive treatment may differ from that in the early stage and different drugs may modify baroreceptor activity differently.

To test this hypothesis we evaluated the effects of antihypertensive treatment on aortic baroreceptor activity in SHR with chronic hypertension (36 weeks of age) using four widely used drugs (trichlormethiazide, atenolol, nicardipine, and enalapril). In addition, to determine whether the modulation of baroreceptor activity is influenced by the timing of treatment initiation, we started antihypertensive treatment either in the early stage of hypertension (10 weeks of age) to attenuate the full development of hypertension for 26 weeks or in the chronic stage (28 weeks of age) to moderately reverse high BP for 8 weeks.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rats
Male SHR and WKY (8 weeks of age) were obtained from Charles River Japan Co (Atsugi, Japan). All experimental procedures were in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines.

Experiment 1
WKY (n=13) were fed a normal diet (0.38% NaCl; Nippon Clea). SHR were divided into an untreated group (n=13) that was fed a normal diet and four treated groups (n=10 in each group) that received one of four drugs mixed in the diet as follows: trichlormethiazide (10 mg/kg per day; Schering Corp), atenolol (90 mg/kg per day; Zeneca PLC), nicardipine (150 mg/kg per day; Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co), or enalapril maleate (10 mg/kg per day; Merck Sharp & Dohme). Antihypertensive treatment was initiated at the developmental phase of hypertension (10 weeks of age) and was continued for 26 weeks to the chronic hypertensive stage (36 weeks of age). Aortic baroreceptor function was examined at 10 and 36 weeks of age in untreated SHR and WKY and at 36 weeks of age in treated SHR.

Experiment 2
WKY (n=16) were fed a normal diet. SHR were divided into an untreated group (n=16) that was fed a normal diet and four treated groups (n=8 in each group) that were given one of four drugs mixed in the diet as in experiment 1. Antihypertensive therapy was initiated after the progression of hypertension (28 weeks of age) and was continued for 8 weeks to 36 weeks of age. Aortic baroreceptor function was examined at 28 and 36 weeks of age in untreated SHR and WKY and at 36 weeks of age in treated SHR.

Arterial and Venous Catheterization
Polyethylene catheters prepared from PE-10 (Clay Adams) fused with PE-50 tubing were placed into the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava through the femoral artery and vein, respectively, with rats under ether anesthesia. One day after catheterization arterial pressure was recorded in conscious rats (AP-611G, Nihon Kohden Co). The rats were then anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg IV; Abbott Laboratories), which was supplemented (5 mg/kg IV) as needed to maintain the absence of eyelid and paw-pinch reflexes.

Recording and Quantification of Aortic Nerve Activity
Procedures for recording aortic nerve activity were described previously.3 13 Briefly, after a midline cervical incision was made, the left aortic nerve was isolated and placed on multistrand stainless wire electrodes (A-M Systems, Inc) with the use of a dissecting microscope (SMZ, Nikon). The nerve and electrodes were fixed with Wacker Sil-Gel 604 (Wacker-Chemie). The electrodes were connected to a high-impedance probe (JB101J, Nihon Kohden) that was connected to a differential amplifier (AVB-10, Nihon Kohden) with a band-pass filter of 50 to 3000 Hz. The amplified activity was rectified and integrated by a root-mean-square integrator (EI-601G, Nihon Kohden) with a time constant of 28 milliseconds and further filtered at 0.08 Hz for quantification.3 13 14 15 16 17 The background noise was determined when nerve activity had been eliminated by decreasing MAP by nitroglycerin infusion; this value was subtracted from all experimental values of nerve activity. Amplification and filtering used to record nerve activity were identical for all rats in the present study. Aortic nerve activity was measured during changes in MAP. To lower MAP by 50 to 70 mm Hg in approximately 20 seconds, nitroglycerin (2.2 mmol/L) was infused at rates of 0.1 to 0.39 mL/min. To raise MAP by 50 to 70 mm Hg in approximately 20 seconds, phenylephrine (4.9 mmol/L) was infused at rates of 5.86 to 11.5 µL/min.

Data Analysis
Pth was designated as the MAP at which aortic nerve activity firing disappeared and integrated voltage equaled noise, and Psat was designated as the MAP at which aortic nerve activity no longer increased (even though the arterial pressure continued to increase).3 18 The data for aortic nerve activity were normalized in two ways. The maximal value of aortic nerve activity was defined as 100% in one method,1 3 19 and the value of the aortic nerve activity at baseline MAP was defined as 100% in the other.3 13 20 We plotted aortic nerve activity at MAP intervals of 5 mm Hg and fitted the data to a logistic function curve by using a nonlinear regression program (PROC NLIN, SAS Institute Inc). Four parameters were derived from the following equation21 22 : Aortic Nerve Activity=P4+P1/{1+exp[P2(P3-MAP)]}, where P1 is the aortic nerve activity range; P2 is the slope coefficient (independent of the range); P3 is the MAP at the midpoint of the curve (BP50); and P4 is the lower plateau of aortic nerve activity. The sensitivity of aortic nerve activity was defined as the Gmax of the logistic function curve and was calculated as Gmax=P1 · P2/4.3 13 14 15 18 20

Statistical Analysis
Results are given as mean±SEM. Statistical difference was evaluated by unpaired t test or ANOVA followed by Scheffé's F test. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experiment 1
MAP
MAP did not differ significantly between the conscious and anesthetized states in all rats (Tables 1 and 2). The MAP of untreated SHR was higher than that of untreated WKY at 10 weeks of age and was further increased at 36 weeks (P<.01). Antihypertensive treatment with each of the four drugs beginning at 10 weeks of age attenuated the development of hypertension in 36-week-old SHR to a similar extent.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Parameters of 10-Week-Old Rats in Experiment 1


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Parameters of 36-Week-Old Rats in Experiment 1

Baseline and Maximal Aortic Nerve Activities
At 10 weeks of age baseline aortic nerve activity was greater but maximal aortic nerve activity was similar in untreated SHR compared with untreated WKY (Table 1). These findings are compatible with our previous data.3 At 36 weeks baseline and maximal values of aortic nerve activity were comparable among untreated SHR and WKY (Table 2). Although the maximal aortic nerve activities in the four treated SHR groups were slightly greater than values in untreated SHR, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Pth, Psat, and BP50
Fig 1 shows the changes in aortic nerve activity in response to changes in arterial pressure in 36-week-old rats. Pth, Psat, and BP50 values in untreated SHR were greater than those in untreated WKY at 10 weeks of age (Table 1) and were further increased (P<.01) at 36 weeks (Table 2). Each of the four antihypertensive drugs equally attenuated the increase in Pth, which in turn correlated with the attenuation of hypertension (Table 2 and Fig 2). All four antihypertensive drugs also diminished the increase in Psat, but nicardipine and enalapril restrained the increase in Psat to a greater extent than did trichlormethiazide or atenolol (Table 2). The four drugs also attenuated the increase in BP50, which tended to be lower in nicardipine- and enalapril-treated SHR than in trichlormethiazide- and atenolol-treated SHR (Table 2).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Line graphs show MAP–aortic nerve activity relation expressed as percentage of the maximal nerve activity in untreated WKY ({circ}), untreated SHR ({triangleup}), and SHR treated from 10 to 36 weeks of age ({blacksquare}) in experiment 1. Gmax was depressed in untreated SHR compared with untreated WKY. Although Gmax values in all treated SHR groups were greater than in untreated SHR, Gmax values in nicardipine- and enalapril-treated SHR were greater than those in trichlormethiazide- and atenolol-treated SHR. Values are mean±SEM.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Plots show relation between MAP and Pth (top) and Gmax (bottom) in untreated and treated SHR. Dotted lines join points for 10- and 36-week-old untreated SHR. The effect of antihypertensive treatment on Pth was proportional to the BP reduction in all treated SHR groups. On the other hand, the effect of early treatment with nicardipine or enalapril on Gmax was greater than expected from the BP reduction, whereas Gmax correlated with the BP changes in the other treatment groups. Values are mean±SEM. TCM indicates trichlormethiazide; ATE, atenolol; NIC, nicardipine; ENA, enalapril; 10-36, rats treated from 10 to 36 weeks of age; and 28-36, rats treated from 28 to 36 weeks of age.

Gmax of the MAP–Aortic Nerve Activity Curve
Analysis with normalization to the maximal aortic nerve activity showed that Gmax in untreated SHR was smaller than that in untreated WKY at 10 weeks of age (Table 1) and was further decreased (P<.01) at 36 weeks (Table 2). The decline in Gmax of SHR was partially prevented by treatment with trichlormethiazide or atenolol in proportion to the BP-lowering effects (Table 2 and Fig 2). In contrast, treatment with nicardipine or enalapril preserved Gmax, leading to a greater Gmax than expected by the BP level (Table 2 and Fig 2). Thus, Gmax was greater in nicardipine- and enalapril-treated SHR than in trichlormethiazide- and atenolol-treated SHR. Logistic analysis with normalization to the baseline nerve activity also showed that Gmax in nicardipine-treated (4.51±0.12% baseline/mm Hg) and enalapril-treated (4.20±0.17% baseline/mm Hg) SHR was greater (P<.05 to .01) than in trichlormethiazide-treated (3.64±0.18% baseline/mm Hg) and atenolol-treated (3.49±0.11% baseline/mm Hg) SHR.

Experiment 2
MAP
MAP was comparable between the conscious and anesthetized states in all rat groups (Tables 3 and 4). The MAP of untreated SHR at 28 weeks of age was higher than that of age-matched untreated WKY and was similar to that of untreated SHR at 36 weeks. Antihypertensive treatment with each of the four drugs beginning at 28 weeks of age similarly decreased MAP in SHR at 36 weeks.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Parameters of 28-Week-Old Rats in Experiment 2


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Parameters of 36-Week-Old Rats in Experiment 2

Baseline and Maximal Aortic Nerve Activities
At both 28 and 36 weeks of age baseline and maximal aortic nerve activities were similar among untreated SHR and WKY (Tables 3 and 4). Although the maximal aortic nerve activities in the four treated SHR groups were slightly greater than those in untreated SHR, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Pth, Psat, and BP50
Fig 3 shows the changes in aortic nerve activity in response to changes in arterial pressure in 36-week-old rats. Pth, Psat, and BP50 values in untreated SHR were greater than values in age-matched untreated WKY at both 28 and 36 weeks of age (Tables 3 and 4). Antihypertensive therapy with the four drugs similarly reduced Pth, Psat, and BP50 in association with the BP reduction (Table 4 and Fig 2). No differences in Pth, BP50, and Psat were found among the four groups of treated SHR.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Line graphs show MAP–aortic nerve activity relation expressed as percentage of maximal nerve activity in untreated WKY ({circ}), untreated SHR ({triangleup}), and SHR treated from 28 to 36 weeks of age ({blacksquare}) in experiment 2. Gmax was smaller in untreated SHR than in untreated WKY and was similarly increased by treatment with each of the four drugs in SHR. Values are mean±SEM.

Gmax of the MAP–Aortic Nerve Activity Curve
Analysis with normalization to the maximal aortic nerve activity showed that Gmax in untreated SHR at 28 weeks of age was smaller than that in age-matched untreated WKY and was similar to that in untreated SHR at 36 weeks (Tables 3 and 4). Gmax of SHR was similarly potentiated by antihypertensive therapy with the four drugs in proportion to the BP reduction (Table 4 and Fig 2). Logistic function analysis with normalization to the baseline nerve activity showed a similar increase in Gmax for trichlormethiazide-treated (3.52±0.13% baseline/mm Hg), atenolol-treated (3.46±0.20% baseline/mm Hg), nicardipine-treated (3.61±0.13% baseline/mm Hg), and enalapril-treated (3.69±0.17% baseline/mm Hg) SHR compared with untreated SHR (2.12±0.10% baseline/mm Hg).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study is the first to demonstrate the effects of four different classes of antihypertensive drugs (a thiazide diuretic [trichlormethiazide], a ß-blocker [atenolol], a calcium channel antagonist [nicardipine], and an ACE inhibitor [enalapril]) on the correlation between BP and arterial baroreceptor activity in the long-term treatment of chronic hypertension.

Baroreceptor Resetting to Lower Pressures
It has been shown that acute baroreceptor resetting, as examined by changes in Pth during short-term (15 minutes) hypotension, is affected differently depending on which antihypertensive drug is used in normotensive rats.23 24 In contrast, the present study demonstrated that long-term antihypertensive treatment with four different drug classes decreased Pth to a similar extent in SHR with highly developed hypertension (36 weeks of age) regardless of whether treatment was begun early (from 10 weeks) or late (from 28 weeks). These results extended those of our previous work which showed that 2 weeks of treatment with each of the four drugs decreased Pth to a similar extent in young hypertensive SHR (10 weeks of age).3 Moreover, the decrease in Pth correlated well with the BP-lowering effect. These findings confirm earlier studies showing that the capacity for baroreceptor Pth to reset to a lower level remains unchanged in chronic hypertension.19 25 26 27 They provide additional information indicating that irrespective of depressor mechanisms and the timing of treatment, the prevailing BP is the major determining factor for baroreceptor Pth during chronic antihypertensive therapy. On the other hand, the decrease in Psat in response to the lowering of BP differed among the four drugs when treatment was started at a young age. This indicates that a shift in the pressure–baroreceptor activity curve at higher pressures was in part modulated by nondepressor mechanisms. The lower Psat with the similar Pth values in nicardipine- and enalapril-treated SHR, compared with those in trichlormethiazide- and atenolol-treated SHR, led to a narrowed range of pressure over which baroreceptor activity changed, making the pressure-activity curve steeper. These findings are consistent with the Gmax obtained by logistic function analysis.

Baroreceptor Sensitivity
The depressed baroreceptor sensitivity in chronic renovascular hypertension is reported to be restored even after a brief (60 to 120 minutes) reversal of hypertension.19 27 Regarding long-term (4 to 40 weeks) antihypertensive treatment, combinations of vasodilators, diuretics, and adrenergic antagonists potentiate the baroreceptor sensitivity in SHR.28 29 30 We previously demonstrated that 2 weeks of treatment of young hypertensive SHR (10 weeks of age) with a single administration of the four classes of drugs (a thiazide diuretic, a ß-blocker, a calcium channel antagonist, and an ACE inhibitor) potentiates baroreceptor sensitivity (Gmax of the pressure-activity curve) to a similar extent.3 In the present study attenuation of hypertension with each of the four drugs started early (10 weeks of age) preserved the baroreceptor sensitivity in the chronic stage of hypertension (36 weeks of age) although the extent of preservation was variable among the four drugs. Delayed treatment from 28 to 36 weeks of age with the four drugs similarly restored baroreceptor sensitivity in association with the BP reduction. The present results combined with previous studies indicate that lowering BP itself is the major contributor to recovery of the depressed baroreceptor sensitivity in hypertension. Furthermore, it is remarkable that only early and long-term treatment with nicardipine and enalapril augmented baroreceptor sensitivity to an extent greater than that expected by the BP reduction (Fig 2). This additional effect of nicardipine and enalapril may reflect the early initiation of treatment (10 versus 28 weeks of age). However, the duration of early treatment was longer than that of delayed treatment (26 versus 8 weeks), so the relative roles of time of treatment initiation versus treatment duration could not be exactly distinguished. Nevertheless, the present findings indicate that the pharmacological actions of calcium channel antagonists and ACE inhibitors, in addition to the BP-lowering effect, can at least in part modify baroreceptor sensitivity by interacting with some factors that occur during the progression of hypertension. We will discuss candidates for such factors below.

First, it is possible that degeneration of the baroreceptors may be caused by chronic hypertension. Angell-James31 reported that degenerative changes were observed by light microscopy in some of the baroreceptor nerve endings of renal hypertensive rabbits. In contrast, studies by Krauhs32 and Andresen et al2 demonstrated no morphological differences between the baroreceptors of SHR and WKY by electron microscopic examinations. In the present study the maximal value of whole aortic baroreceptor activity was not decreased in untreated SHR compared with untreated WKY, suggesting that degeneration of the baroreceptors, if it exists, may be minimal. Second, sustained hypertension induces changes in the aortic medial layer (such as smooth muscle hypertrophy and increased collagen content) that affect baroreceptor sensitivity through changes in vessel distensibility and/or mechanical coupling of the baroreceptors to the vessel.2 7 28 32 ACE inhibitors and calcium channel antagonists have been shown to prevent these medial changes to a greater extent than ß-blockers, diuretics, and vasodilators,8 9 10 12 33 34 35 probably by acting directly on vascular smooth muscle.36 37 38 39 These beneficial effects on the aortic media may have contributed to the preserved baroreceptor sensitivity observed after early treatment with enalapril and nicardipine. Moreover, this hypothesis is supported by the finding that these pronounced effects on Gmax were not observed in delayed therapy because it may be difficult to regress hypertensive medial changes that already exist by antihypertensive treatment.4 28 40 41 Finally, recent studies have shown that several substances released from the endothelium42 43 are involved in the modulation of baroreceptor activity in a paracrine manner. Prolonged antihypertensive therapy begun early with ACE inhibitors and calcium channel antagonists can effectively prevent hypertensive endothelial damage,11 12 potentially leading to the preservation of baroreceptor sensitivity. As discussed above, it appears likely that enalapril and nicardipine act on vascular components rather than on the baroreceptors themselves to potentiate the baroreceptor sensitivity to an extent greater than that expected by the attenuation of hypertension. However, further experiments are needed before the exact site or sites of action are known.

Study Limitations
In the present study we recorded multifiber activity that likely represents activity of myelinated baroreceptor afferents. Therefore, we could not evaluate the possible effects of hypertension and treatment of hypertension on the activity of baroreceptor unmyelinated fibers in this study. Furthermore, multifiber recordings do not enable as precise a determination of threshold pressure as do single-fiber recordings. Additionally, we used the mean Pth, but Krieger6 observed that an exact coincidence exists between the systolic Pth and the diastolic pressure level. These methodological factors might have contributed to the present results showing that the extent of decreases in the mean Pth was smaller than decreases in MAP produced by the drugs.

Summary
In the treatment of hypertension, baroreceptor resetting to a lower pressure level was similarly induced by administration of four different classes of drugs, whereas baroreceptor sensitivity was potentiated to a greater extent by administration of nicardipine or enalapril than by trichlormethiazide or atenolol when initiated in the early stage of hypertension and continued over the long term.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme
BP = blood pressure
BP50 = mean arterial pressure at the midpoint of the curve
Gmax = maximal gain
MAP = mean arterial pressure
Pth = threshold pressure
Psat = saturation pressure
SHR = spontaneously hypertensive rat(s)
WKY = Wistar-Kyoto rat(s)


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by research grants (Nos. 05770480 and 06770873) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan. The authors thank Haruko Kihara for her excellent secretarial assistance.

Received February 8, 1995; first decision March 10, 1995; accepted May 19, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Moreira ED, Ida F, Oliveira VLL, Krieger EM. Early depression of the baroreceptor sensitivity during onset of hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl II):II-198-II-201.
  2. Andresen MC, Krauhs JM, Brown AM. Relationship of aortic wall and baroreceptor properties during development in normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circ Res.. 1978;43:728-738. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ichikawa M, Suzuki H, Kumagai K, Ryuzaki M, Kumagai H, Jimbo M, Nishizawa M, Saruta T. Effects of antihypertensive agents on baroreceptor function in early hypertensive rats. Hypertension.. 1994;24:808-815. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Owens GK. Differential effects of antihypertensive drug therapy on vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy, hyperploidy, and hyperplasia in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Circ Res.. 1985;56:525-536. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Haudenschild CC, Prescott MF, Chobanian AV. Effects of hypertension and its reversal on aortic intima lesions of the rat. Hypertension.. 1980;2:33-44. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Krieger EM. Arterial baroreceptor resetting in hypertension. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1989;(suppl 15):3-17.
  7. Chapleau MW, Hajduczok G, Abboud FM. Peripheral and central mechanisms of baroreflex resetting. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1989;(suppl 15):31-43.
  8. Frohlich ED, Horinaka S. Cardiac and aortic effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Hypertension. 1991;18(suppl II):II-2-II-7.
  9. Frohlich ED, Sasaki O, Chien Y, Arita M. Changes in cardiovascular mass, left ventricular pumping ability and aortic distensibility after calcium antagonists in Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens.. 1992;10:1369-1378. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Owens GK. Influence of blood pressure on development of aortic medial smooth muscle hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension.. 1987;9:178-187. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Clozel M, Kuhn H, Hefti F. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and hydralazine on endothelial functions in hypertensive rats. Hypertension.. 1990;16:532-540. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ferrante F, Abbate F, Ciriaco E, Laurà R, Amenta F. Influence of isradipine treatment on the morphology of the aorta in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens.. 1994;12:523-531. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Jimbo M, Suzuki H, Ichikawa M, Kumagai K, Nishizawa M, Saruta T. Role of nitric oxide in regulation of baroreceptor reflex. J Auton Nerv Syst.. 1994;50:209-219. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kumagai H, Suzuki H, Ryuzaki M, Matsukawa S, Saruta T. Baroreflex control of renal sympathetic nerve activity is potentiated at early phase of two-kidney, one-clip Goldblatt hypertension in conscious rabbits. Circ Res.. 1990;67:1309-1322. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Kumagai K, Suzuki H, Ryuzaki M, Kumagai H, Ichikawa M, Jimbo M, Matsumura Y, Saruta T. Effects of antihypertensive agents on arterial baroreceptor reflexes in conscious rats. Hypertension.. 1992;20:701-709. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kumagai H, Suzuki H, Ichikawa M, Matsumura Y, Jimbo M, Ryuzaki M, Saruta T. Central and peripheral vasopressin interact differently with sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system in renal hypertensive rabbits. Circ Res.. 1993;72:1255-1265. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kumagai K, Suzuki H, Ichikawa M, Jimbo M, Murakami M, Ryuzaki M, Saruta T. Nitric oxide increases renal blood flow by interacting with the sympathetic nervous system. Hypertension.. 1994;24:220-226. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wang J, Ochoa M, Patel MB, Zucker IH, Loud AV, Zeballos GA, Hintze TH. Carotid baroreceptor function in dogs with chronic norepinephrine infusion. Hypertension.. 1991;17:745-754. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Moreira ED, Ida F, Krieger EM. Reversibility of baroreceptor hyposensibility during reversal of hypertension. Hypertension.. 1990;15:791-796. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. DiBona GF, Sawin LL. Reflex regulation of renal nerve activity in cardiac failure. Am J Physiol.. 1994;266:R27-R39. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kent BB, Drane JW, Blumenstein B, Manning J. A mathematical model to assess changes in the baroreceptor reflex. Cardiology.. 1972;57:295-310. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Head GA, McCarty R. Vagal and sympathetic components of the heart rate range and gain of the baroreceptor-heart rate reflex in conscious rats. J Auton Nerv Syst.. 1987;21:203-213. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Salgado HC, Krieger EM. Extent of baroreceptor resetting in response to sodium nitroprusside and verapamil. Hypertension. 1988;11(suppl I):I-121-I-125.
  24. de Abreu GR, Salgado HC. Antihypertensive drugs distinctly modulate the rapid resetting of the baroreceptors. Hypertension. 1990;15(suppl I):I-63-I-67.
  25. Sumitani M, Krieger EM. Regression of the baroreceptor resetting in hypertension of long duration in rats. Clin Sci.. 1981;61:185S-186S.
  26. Andresen MC, Yang M. Rapid baroreceptor resetting is unaltered by chronic hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol.. 1989;256:H1228-H1235. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Xie P, McDowell TS, Chapleau MW, Hajduczok G, Abboud FM. Rapid baroreceptor resetting in chronic hypertension: implications for normalization of arterial pressure. Hypertension.. 1991;17:72-79. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sapru HN, Wang SC. Modification of aortic baroreceptor resetting in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Am J Physiol.. 1976;230:664-674.
  29. Sapru HN, Krieger AJ. Role of receptor elements in baroreceptor resetting. Am J Physiol.. 1979;236:H174-H182.
  30. Andresen MC, Brown AM. Baroreceptor function in spontaneously hypertensive rats: effect of preventing hypertension. Circ Res.. 1980;47:829-834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Angell-James JE. Characteristics of single aortic and right subclavian baroreceptor fiber activity in rabbits with chronic renal hypertension. Circ Res.. 1973;32:149-161. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Krauhs JM. Structure of rat aortic baroreceptors and their relationship to connective tissue. J Neurocytol.. 1979;8:401-414. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Limas C, Westrum B, Limas CJ. Comparative effects of hydralazine and captopril on the cardiovascular changes in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Pathol.. 1984;117:360-371. [Abstract]
  34. Albaladejo P, Bouaziz H, Duriez M, Gohlke P, Levy BI, Safar ME, Benetos A. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition prevents the increase in aortic collagen in rats. Hypertension.. 1994;23:74-82. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Chichester CO, Rodgers RL. Effects of doxazosin on vascular collagen synthesis, arterial pressure and serum lipids in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987;10(suppl 9):S21-S26.
  36. Paquet J-L, Baudouin-Legros M, Brunelle G, Meyer P. Angiotensin II-induced proliferation of aortic myocytes in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens.. 1990;8:565-572. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Ko YD, Sachinidis A, Graack GH, Appenheimer AJ, Wieczorek AJ, Düsing R, Vetter H. Inhibition of angiotensin II and platelet-derived growth factor-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation by calcium entry blockers. Clin Invest.. 1992;70:113-117. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Kato H, Suzuki H, Tajima S, Ogata Y, Tominaga T, Sato A, Saruta T. Angiotensin II stimulates collagen synthesis in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens.. 1991;9:17-22. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Orekhov AN, Tertov VV, Khashimov KA, Kudryashov SS, Smirnov VN. Evidence of antiatherosclerotic action of verapamil from direct effects on arterial cells. Am J Cardiol.. 1987;59:495-496. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Limas C, Westrum B, Limas CJ. Effects of antihypertensive therapy on the vascular changes of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Pathol.. 1983;111:380-393. [Abstract]
  41. Keeley FW, Elmoselhi A, Leenen FHH. Effects of antihypertensive drug classes on regression of connective tissue components of hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1991;17(suppl 2):S64-S69.
  42. Chen HI, Chapleau MW, McDowell TS, Abboud FM. Prostaglandins contribute to activation of baroreceptors in rabbits: possible paracrine influence of endothelium. Circ Res.. 1990;67:1394-1404. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Chapleau MW, Hajduczok G, Abboud FM. Suppression of baroreceptor discharge by endothelin at high carotid sinus pressure. Am J Physiol.. 1992;263:R103-R108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J. Zicha and J. Kunes
Ontogenetic Aspects of Hypertension Development: Analysis in the Rat
Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1227 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
L. Jin, L. Chao, and J. Chao
Potassium supplement upregulates the expression of renal kallikrein and bradykinin B2 receptor in SHR
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): F476 - F484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Uechi, K. Asai, N. Sato, and S. F. Vatner
Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel Promoter Restores Baroreflex Sensitivity in Conscious Dogs With Heart Failure
Circulation, September 29, 1998; 98(13): 1342 - 1347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. Tsuchihashi, S. Kagiyama, Y. Ohya, I. Abe, and M. Fujishima
Antihypertensive Treatment and the Responsiveness to Glutamate in Ventrolateral Medulla
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 73 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Nishizawa, H. Kumagai, M. Ichikawa, N. Oshima, H. Suzuki, and T. Saruta
Improvement in Baroreflex Function by an Oral Angiotensin Receptor Antagonist in Rats With Myocardial Infarction
Hypertension, January 1, 1997; 29(1): 458 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Kumagai, H. Suzuki, M. Ichikawa, M. Jimbo, M. Nishizawa, M. Ryuzaki, and T. Saruta
Comparison of Early and Late Start of Antihypertensive Agents and Baroreceptor Reflexes
Hypertension, February 1, 1996; 27(2): 209 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saruta, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichikawa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Saruta, T.