(Hypertension. 1995;26:503-508.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiovascular Division (J.N.C., D.M., L.L., J.R., J.M.) and the General and Preventive Medicine Division (G.M.), Department of Medicine, and the Division of Health Computer Sciences, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (S.F.), University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: arterial compliance cardiac output vasodilation drugs atherosclerosis hypertension
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To apply this method more widely in an effort to examine large populations of individuals and monitor responses over time, it was necessary to develop a noninvasive technique that could approximate the data obtained from intra-arterial pressure measurements. Furthermore, since a cardiac output (CO) measurement is required for calculation of arterial compliance using the circulatory model, a reliable noninvasive technique for CO measurement also was required. This report describes these noninvasive techniques and compares noninvasive results with those obtained from simultaneous intra-arterial recordings combined with dye curve CO determinations. We also used the noninvasive technique to examine several groups of subjects to confirm and extend our observations of alterations of compliance in disease and in response to drugs.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A parameter-estimating algorithm was then applied to this representative beat for determination of the best set of Ai values for matching the diastolic portion of the measured beat to the multiexponential waveform of the following equation:
![]() |
Once the six Ai values were determined, the modified Windkessel model parameters were calculated from the Ai values and CO by means of the circuit equations that define the operation of the modified Windkessel system (Fig 1). These model parameters represent the capacitive compliance (C1), oscillatory compliance (C2), blood volume inertia (L), and systemic vascular resistance (R).
|
CO was estimated from an algorithm developed in our laboratory to assist in these clinical studies. It is a multivariate function of ejection time, heart rate, body surface area, and age7 and can be determined from the arterial pressure waveform, measured with the use of invasive or noninvasive instrumentation, with the following formula developed from an experimental set of "learning" data and validated in an independent set of "test" data: Stroke Volume=-6.6+(0.25 ET)-(0.62 HR)+(40.4 BSA)-(0.51 Age), where ET is ejection time in milliseconds, HR is heart rate in beats per minute, and BSA is body surface area in millimeters squared.
To test CO we performed estimator invasive studies. The brachial artery was cannulated with an indwelling plastic needle and the pulsatile arterial waveform recorded with a Statham transducer (Viggo-Spectramed). A central venous catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein and used for injection of indocyanine green into the superior vena cava. CO was calculated by withdrawal of brachial arterial blood through a densitometer (Waters Instruments, Inc) with the use of a CO computer. Dye curves were performed at least in triplicate with the requirement that three measurements varied by less than 15%. CO estimates from the estimator algorithm were then compared with measurements from the dye curves.
All subjects used in these studies gave informed consent for participating in the protocol, which was approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board.
Statistical analysis was carried out with correlation coefficient and paired and independent t tests for comparison of subject groups. Differences between methods and repeated studies variability were assessed with the Bland-Altman technique.8
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
CO measured by the indocyanine green dye dilution technique was compared directly with CO calculated from the estimator developed in our laboratory in 101 subjects. As shown in Fig 4, agreement was satisfactory between the two methods. The difference (invasive minus noninvasive) between the methods averaged -0.13±0.94 L/min. In 92% of the cases estimated CO was within 25% of measured CO.
|
Arterial compliance calculated from the noninvasive waveform and noninvasive CO algorithm was compared with the compliance calculated from the brachial arterial invasive pressure measurements and the indocyanine green dye dilution CO measurement. As shown in Fig 5 (top), C1 measured noninvasively correlated closely with C1 measured invasively (r=.82, P<.001). The mean difference between the methods (invasive minus noninvasive) was -0.34±0.36 mL/mm Hg (Fig 5, bottom). Noninvasively measured C2 tended to overestimate invasively measured C2 (Fig 6, top); nonetheless, the correlation coefficient was significant (r=.62, P<.001). The mean difference was -0.018±0.025 mL/mm Hg (Fig 6, bottom).
|
|
Reproducibility Studies
In 20 subjects noninvasive studies were repeated at an interval of
1 to 2 weeks with no intervention. Arterial pressure varied
considerably between the two studies (first minus second measurement:
systolic mean difference, 2.8±11.7 mm Hg; diastolic,
1.0±8.1 mm Hg). C1 averaged 1.86 mL/mm Hg, and the
difference between the two studies averaged 0.015±0.38 mL/mm Hg.
C2 averaged 0.078 mL/mm Hg, and the difference averaged
-0.007±0.014 mL/mm Hg.
Arterial Compliance in Hypertension
Noninvasive studies were performed in 32 subjects with essential
hypertension on no drug therapy, and data were compared with those from
31 nearly age-matched normotensive control subjects. The
hypertensive subjects included 17 men and 15 women with a mean age of
54±7 years and mean blood pressure of 152/86 mm Hg. The normotensive
subjects included 20 men and 11 women with a mean age of 47±5 years
and mean blood pressure of 115/63 mm Hg. Heart rate in the
hypertensive subjects averaged 63 beats per minute and in the
normotensive subjects 67 beats per minute. As shown in Fig 7, C1 was similar in the normotensive and
hypertensive subjects (2.24 versus 1.94 mL/mm Hg, P=NS),
whereas C2 was reduced by 31% in the hypertensive subjects
(0.075 versus 0.052 mL/mm Hg, P<.05).
|
Noninvasive Compliance in Coronary Artery
Disease
A group of 29 postmenopausal women with documented
symptomatic coronary artery disease (mean age, 55.5
years) was compared with a group of 23 age-matched postmenopausal
women with no evidence of vascular disease (mean age, 52.8 years) (Fig 8). Blood pressures were similar
(average, 132/70 and 123/68 mm Hg, respectively). C2 was
reduced by 24% in the subjects with coronary disease compared
with those without coronary disease (0.067 versus 0.051
mL/mm Hg, P<.05), and C1 was similar in the
two groups (1.78 versus 1.79 mL/mm Hg). Heart rate and CO were not
different between the two groups.
|
Response to Drugs
The sensitivity of the noninvasive technique in identifying
vascular effects of vasodilator drugs has been assessed. Fig 9 displays the change in pulse contour elicited by the
administration of 25 mg hydralazine and 20 mg isosorbide
dinitrate to a hypertensive subject. The altered pulse wave results in
prominent increases in C1 and C2.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pulse wave analysis carried out at any central or peripheral arterial recording site can result in similar values for total systemic C1 and C2. Although the actual contour of the diastolic waveform may differ at different recording sites, these differences relate primarily to varying initial conditions that are not model-dependent parameters.16 Use of a noninvasive technique for recording of a peripheral waveform requires not only accurate calibration of the pressure measurement but also faithful representation of the slope of the diastolic decay and of the oscillatory component recorded in diastole.
Data from the present study confirm the potential usefulness of such a noninvasive technique. With the use of a radial arterial tonometer, the recorded waveform appears visually to approximate closely the waveforms obtained from direct arterial puncture. Furthermore, the CO algorithm developed in our laboratory appears to be a satisfactory method for estimation of output for use in the modified Windkessel model formula. As noted in Fig 5 (top), the output algorithm tends to overestimate CO when the measured CO is low and to underestimate CO when the measured value is high. When applied to the Windkessel model, the percent error in CO measurement would result in a comparable percent error in compliance estimates. Thus, even a 20% error in CO would result in only a 20% error in C2, which is less than the average difference detected between normotensive subjects and subjects with vascular disease. The algorithm for CO has been validated only in subjects with well-maintained cardiac function without significant impairment in contractility. Therefore, the subjects used in this noninvasive assessment are those who exhibit no signs or symptoms of heart failure. An algorithm suitable for heart failure is currently under development in our laboratory.
Compliance measurements calculated from noninvasive waveforms tended to overestimate values obtained from invasive studies. C1 was overestimated by an average of 0.34 mL/mm Hg, and C2 was overestimated by an average of 0.018 mL/mm Hg. However, the absolute value of the compliance is less important than the sensitivity of the technique to distinguish subjects with and without vascular disease and to detect the effects of vasoactive drugs on the arterial vasculature. We have now explored the usefulness of this noninvasive method in two clinical states that have previously been identified as exhibiting abnormalities of systemic arterial compliance. In subjects with essential hypertension, C2 was significantly reduced compared with that in normotensive subjects. The magnitude of this reduction was somewhat less than previously reported with the invasive techniques.4 This possible reduction of sensitivity of the noninvasive method is not surprising, because the more damped noninvasive waveform might tend to reduce some of the oscillatory components of the waveform used in calculating C2. Nonetheless, the pulse contour abnormality identified with the noninvasive technique still was effective in characterizing the abnormality in those individuals with essential hypertension. Previous studies have shown conflicting data relating to arterial compliance in hypertension. A reduced arterial compliance has been described in some studies,17 18 19 20 21 but in other studies this has been ascribed to the passive decrease in compliance that would be associated with a higher arterial pressure.22 23 24 25 Most of these studies have explored single arteries, and a heterogeneity of response in different conduit arteries has been described.26 The abnormality of C2 detected from pulse contour analysis represents a lumped parameter not generated from the conduit brachial or radial arteries but probably residing in the smaller microcirculatory vessels or branch points that serve as reflecting sites in the circulation.27
Recent studies have suggested that patients with coronary disease may have abnormalities of systemic arterial function. Although atherosclerosis and coronary disease were previously viewed as localized to visible endothelial lesions, abnormalities of structure and function of vessels without plaque formation have been demonstrated.12 28 Our studies on arterial compliance in postmenopausal women with and without coronary artery disease are consistent with these observations. A reduction of systemic C2 in the presence of coronary disease suggests that functional abnormalities possibly related to abnormal endothelial function may exist in areas remote from the clinically apparent atherosclerotic process.
Vasoactive drugs act through effects on vascular smooth muscle on arterial compliance as well as on arteriolar resistance. The example shown in Fig 9 is indicative of the magnitude of the pulse contour and compliance changes that can be detected after short-term drug administration. These observations raise the possibility that this simple noninvasive technique could become a useful means of monitoring the efficacy of antihypertensive drug therapy.
Although noninvasive arterial pulse contour analysis may not yield numbers for arterial compliance identical to those obtained from invasive measurements, the principle of an abnormality in C2 in the presence of these abnormal states has now been confirmed. These preliminary data suggest that this noninvasive technique may now be applied more widely in an effort to characterize the abnormality of the vasculature in larger populations of subjects and to monitor the response to vasoactive drug therapy. Preliminary studies suggesting that these abnormalities in C2 can be identified before disease is clinically apparent and before blood pressure elevations are detected in hypertensive individuals raise the possibility of this becoming a sensitive screening technique for identifying individuals who need more aggressive management strategies.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dzau VJ. The role of mechanical and humoral factors in growth regulation of vascular smooth muscle and cardiac myocytes. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1993;2:27-32. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Watt TB, Burrus C. Arterial
pressure contour analysis for estimating human vascular
properties. J Appl Physiol. 1976;40:171-176.
4. McVeigh GE, Burns DE, Finkelstein SM, McDonald KM, Mock JE, Feske W, Carlyle PF, Flack J, Grimm R, Cohn JN. Reduced vascular compliance as a marker for essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:245-251. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. McVeigh G, Brennan G, Hayes R, Cohn J, Finkelstein S, Johnston D. Vascular abnormalities in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus identified by arterial waveform analysis. Am J Med. 1993;95:424-430. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Cohn JN, Finkelstein SM. Abnormalities of vascular compliance in hypertension, aging and heart failure. J Hypertens. 1992;10:S61-S64.
7. Finkelstein SM, Cohn JN. Method and apparatus for measuring cardiac output. US Patent No 5241966, 1993.
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M.
Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human
arterial pulse. Circulation. 1989;80:1652-1659.
10.
Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, O'Connor FC,
Wright JG, Lakatta LE, Yin FCP, Lakatta EG. Effects of age and
aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy
adults. Circulation. 1993;88:1456-1462.
11. Ando J, Kawarada A, Shibata M, Yamakushi K, Kamiya A. Pressure-volume relationship of finger arteries in healthy subjects and patients with coronary atherosclerosis measured non-invasively by photoelectric plethysmography. Jpn Circ J. 1991;55:567-575. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Dart AM, Lacombe F, Yeoh JK, Cameron JD, Jennings GL, Laufer E, Esmore DS. Aortic distensibility in patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia, coronary artery disease, or cardiac transplant. Lancet. 1991;338:270-273. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Mohiaddin RH, Underwood SR, Bogren HG, Firmin DN,
Klipstein RH, Rees RSO, Longmore DB. Regional aortic compliance
studied by magnetic resonance imaging: the effects of age, training,
and coronary artery disease. Br Heart J. 1989;62:90-96.
14.
Riley WA, Freedman DS, Higgs NA, Barnes RW, Zinkgraf
SA, Berenson GS. Decreased arterial elasticity
associated with cardiovascular risk factors in the
young: Bogalusa Heart Study.
Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:378-386.
15.
Heagerty AM, Aalkjaer C, Bund SJ, Korsgaard N, Mulvaney
M. Small artery structure in hypertension: dual process of
remodeling and growth. Hypertension. 1993;21:391-397.
16. Finkelstein SM, Cohn JN. First- and third-order models for determining arterial compliance. J Hypertens. 1992;10:S11-S14.
17. Ventura H, Messerli F, Orgman W, Suarez DH, Dreslinski GR, Dunn FG, Reisin E, Frohlich ED. Impaired arterial compliance in borderline hypertension. Am Heart J. 1984;108:132-136. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Simon AC, Laurent S, Levenson JA, Bouthier JE, Safar ME. Estimation of forearm arterial compliance in normal and hypertensive men from simultaneous pressure and flow measurements in the brachial artery, using a pulsed Doppler device and a first-order arterial model during diastole. Cardiovasc Res. 1983;17:331-338. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Simon AC, Safar ME, Levenson JA, London GM, Levy BI, Chau NP. An evaluation of large artery compliance in man. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:H550-H554.
20.
Liu Z, Ting CT, Zhu S, Yin FCP. Aortic
compliance in human hypertension.
Hypertension. 1989;14:129-136.
21.
Armentano R, Simon A, Levenson J, Chau NP, Megnien JL,
Pichel R. Mechanical pressure versus intrinsic effects of
hypertension on large arteries in humans.
Hypertension. 1991;18:657-666.
22. Gribbin B, Pickering TG, Sleight P. Arterial distensibility in normal and hypertensive man. Clin Sci. 1979;56:413-417. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Smulyan H, Vardan S, Griffiths A, Gribbin B. Forearm arterial distensibility in systolic hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;3:387-393. [Abstract]
24. Westling H, Jansson L, Johnson B, Nilsen R. Vasoactive drugs and elastic properties of human arteries in vivo, with special reference to the action of nitroglycerine. Eur Heart J. 1980;1:445-452.
25.
Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Perret F, Niederberger M, Tardy
Y, Mooser V, Nussberger J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Conduit artery
compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in
hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:1-6.
26. Kawasaki T, Sasayama S, Yagi SI, Asakawa T, Hirai T. Noninvasive assessment of the age-related changes in stiffness of major branches of the human arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1987;21:678-687. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. O'Rourke MF, Kelly RP. Wave reflection in the systemic circulation and its implications in ventricular function. J Hypertens. 1993;11:327-337. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Weans SW, Walton JA, Hsia HH, Nabel EG, Sanz ML, Pitt
B. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in
angiographically normal coronary arteries of patients with
coronary artery disease.
Circulation. 1989;79:287-291.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Urbina, R. V. Williams, B. S. Alpert, R. T. Collins, S. R. Daniels, L. Hayman, M. Jacobson, L. Mahoney, M. Mietus-Snyder, A. Rocchini, et al. Noninvasive Assessment of Subclinical Atherosclerosis in Children and Adolescents: Recommendations for Standard Assessment for Clinical Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 919 - 950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Kheda, L. E. Brenner, M. J. Patel, J. J. Wynn, J. J. White, L. M. Prisant, S. A. Jones, and W. D. Paulson Influence of arterial elasticity and vessel dilatation on arteriovenous fistula maturation: a prospective cohort study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 15, 2009; (2009) gfp462v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yaron, Y. Greenman, J. B Rosenfeld, E. Izkhakov, R. Limor, E. Osher, G. Shenkerman, K. Tordjman, and N. Stern Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on arterial stiffness in older hypogonadal men Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2009; 160(5): 839 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Peralta, R. Katz, M. Madero, M. Sarnak, H. Kramer, M. H. Criqui, and M. G. Shlipak The Differential Association of Kidney Dysfunction With Small and Large Arterial Elasticity: The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Am. J. Epidemiol., March 15, 2009; 169(6): 740 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Liu, C.-C. Wei, and P.-C. Lo Variation Analysis of Sphygmogram to Assess Cardiovascular System under Meditation Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 1, 2009; 6(1): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Smith and P. J. Levy Review: New techniques for assessment of vascular function Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2008; 2(5): 373 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Nickel, L. S. Acree, P. S. Montgomery, and A. W. Gardner Association Between Lower-Extremity Function and Arterial Compliance in Older Adults Angiology, May 1, 2008; 59(2): 203 - 208. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. U. Zimmerli, E. Schiffer, P. Zurbig, D. M. Good, M. Kellmann, L. Mouls, A. R. Pitt, J. J. Coon, R. E. Schmieder, K. H. Peter, et al. Urinary Proteomic Biomarkers in Coronary Artery Disease Mol. Cell. Proteomics, February 1, 2008; 7(2): 290 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Compton, M. Wittrock, J.-H. Schaefer, W. Zidek, M. Tepel, and A. Scholze Noninvasive Cardiac Output Determination Using Applanation Tonometry-Derived Radial Artery Pulse Contour Analysis in Critically Ill Patients Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2008; 106(1): 171 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S Acree, P. S Montgomery, and A. W Gardner The influence of obesity on arterial compliance in adult men and women Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2007; 12(3): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. J. Kullo and A. R. Malik Arterial Ultrasonography and Tonometry as Adjuncts to Cardiovascular Risk Stratification J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2007; 49(13): 1413 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Hersh, H. Giannakopoulos, L. M. Levin, S. Secreto, P. A. Moore, C. Peterson, M. Hutcheson, M. Bouhajib, A. Mosenkis, and R. R. Townsend The pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of high-dose articaine with 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 epinephrine. J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2006; 137(11): 1562 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Laurent, J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel, P. Boutouyrie, C. Giannattasio, D. Hayoz, B. Pannier, C. Vlachopoulos, I. Wilkinson, H. Struijker-Boudier, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2006; 27(21): 2588 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oren, I. Isakov, B. Golzman, J. Kogan, S. Turkot, R. Peled, and C. Yosefy The Influence of Smoking Cessation on Hemodynamics and Arterial Compliance Angiology, October 1, 2006; 57(5): 564 - 568. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Nair, R. K Oka, L. D Waring, E. M Umoh, C B. Taylor, and J. P Cooke Vascular compliance versus flow-mediated vasodilation: correlation with cardiovascular risk factors Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2005; 10(4): 275 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Skrabal, H. Mayer, E. Hopfgartner, G. Gratze, G. Haitchi, and A. Holler Multi-site-frequency electromechanocardiography for the prediction of ejection fraction and stroke volume in heart failure Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2005; 7(6): 974 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhong, H. J. Hilton, G. J. Gates, S. Jelic, Y. Stern, M. N. Bartels, R. E. DeMeersman, and R. C. Basner Increased sympathetic and decreased parasympathetic cardiovascular modulation in normal humans with acute sleep deprivation J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2005; 98(6): 2024 - 2032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pannier, A. P. Guerin, S. J. Marchais, M. E. Safar, and G. M. London Stiffness of Capacitive and Conduit Arteries: Prognostic Significance for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 592 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Cohn, A. A. Quyyumi, N. K. Hollenberg, and K. A. Jamerson Surrogate Markers for Cardiovascular Disease: Functional Markers Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25_suppl_1): IV-31 - IV-46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Zion, V. Bond, R. G. Adams, D. Williams, R. E. Fullilove, R. P. Sloan, M. N. Bartels, J. A. Downey, and R. E. De Meersman Low arterial compliance in young African-American males Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 11, 2003; 285(2): H457 - H462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Oliver and D. J. Webb Noninvasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness and Risk of Atherosclerotic Events Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2003; 23(4): 554 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Bild, D. A. Bluemke, G. L. Burke, R. Detrano, A. V. Diez Roux, A. R. Folsom, P. Greenland, D. R. JacobsJr., R. Kronmal, K. Liu, et al. Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: Objectives and Design Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2002; 156(9): 871 - 881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Cruickshank, L. Riste, S. G. Anderson, J. S. Wright, G. Dunn, and R. G. Gosling Aortic Pulse-Wave Velocity and Its Relationship to Mortality in Diabetes and Glucose Intolerance: An Integrated Index of Vascular Function? Circulation, October 15, 2002; 106(16): 2085 - 2090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.S. Mackenzie, I.B. Wilkinson, and J.R. Cockcroft Assessment of arterial stiffness in clinical practice QJM, February 1, 2002; 95(2): 67 - 74. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Romney and R. Z. Lewanczuk Vascular Compliance Is Reduced in the Early Stages of Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care, December 1, 2001; 24(12): 2102 - 2106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Duprez, M. De Buyzere, L De Bruyne, D. Clement, and J. Cohn Small and large artery elasticity indices in peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2001; 6(4): 211 - 214. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Baldassarre, M. Amato, C. Palombo, C. Morizzo, L. Pustina, and C. R. Sirtori Time course of forearm arterial compliance changes during reactive hyperemia Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): H1093 - H1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. London, J. Blacher, B. Pannier, A. P. Guerin, S. J. Marchais, and M. E. Safar Arterial Wave Reflections and Survival in End-Stage Renal Failure Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 434 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-R. Rietzschel, E. Boeykens, M. L. De Buyzere, D. A. Duprez, and D. L. Clement A Comparison Between Systolic and Diastolic Pulse Contour Analysis in the Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness Hypertension, June 1, 2001; 37 (6): e15 - e22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Bank, D. R. Kaiser, S. Rajala, and A. Cheng In Vivo Human Brachial Artery Elastic Mechanics : Effects of Smooth Muscle Relaxation Circulation, July 6, 1999; 100(1): 41 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. McVeigh, C. W. Bratteli, D. J. Morgan, C. M. Alinder, S. P. Glasser, S. M. Finkelstein, and J. N. Cohn Age-Related Abnormalities in Arterial Compliance Identified by Pressure Pulse Contour Analysis : Aging and Arterial Compliance Hypertension, June 1, 1999; 33(6): 1392 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Molino, C. Cerutti, C. Julien, G. Cuisinaud, M.-P. Gustin, and C. Paultre Beat-to-beat estimation of windkessel model parameters in conscious rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 1998; 274(1): H171 - H177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Mitchell, M. A. Pfeffer, P. V. Finn, and J. M. Pfeffer Comparison of techniques for measuring pulse-wave velocity in the rat J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1997; 82(1): 203 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Rector, A. J. Bank, K. A. Mullen, L. K. Tschumperlin, R. Sih, K. Pillai, and S. H. Kubo Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Supplemental Oral L-Arginine in Patients With Heart Failure Circulation, June 15, 1996; 93(12): 2135 - 2141. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |