Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1995;26:514-519

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by London, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stimpel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by London, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stimpel, M.

(Hypertension. 1995;26:514-519.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Influence of Sex on Arterial Hemodynamics and Blood Pressure

Role of Body Height

Gerard M. London; Alain P. Guerin; Bruno Pannier; Sylvain J. Marchais; Michael Stimpel

From Centre Hospitalier F.H. Manhes, Fleury-Merogis; INSERM U337, Paris, France; and the School of Medicine, University of Cologne (Germany) (M.S.).

Correspondence to Dr Gerard London, Centre Hospitalier F.H. Manhes, 8 Grande Rue, 91700 Fleury-Merogis, France.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Systolic pressure is lower in premenopausal women than in age-matched men, but underlying alterations are not well characterized. Aging and body size alter arterial function, influencing pressure wave propagation and amplification in peripheral and central arteries. To assess the possibility that systolic pressure differences in women are related to smaller body size, we studied arterial function in 119 men and 104 women. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women were compared with age-matched men. The following parameters were measured: ankle-arm pressure index (Doppler), aortic and arterial distensibility (pulse wave velocity), systolic pressure and the effect and time delay of arterial wave reflections in the common carotid artery (applanation tonometry), and diameters of the abdominal aorta and aortic bifurcation and their ratio (aortic tapering, echography). Premenopausal women had lower brachial (P<.05) and ankle (P<.01) systolic pressures than age-matched men, whereas the ankle-arm pressure index was higher in men (P<.01). In the overall population the ankle-arm index was positively correlated with body height (P<.001). Carotid systolic pressure was similar in women and men, with an increased effect and earlier return of wave reflections in women (P<.01). The effect of wave reflections was inversely correlated with body height (P<.001) and positively associated with aortic tapering (P<.001), which was increased in women (P<.01). In premenopausal women the distensibility of brachial and femoral arteries was higher than in age-matched men (P<.01), whereas aortic distensibility was not different. Postmenopausal women had arterial distensibility similar to that of age-matched men but still had an increased effect of wave reflections. This study shows that body height is positively correlated with systolic pressure amplification from central to peripheral arteries and inversely correlated with the effect of wave reflections in central arteries. Shorter body height in women results in less peripheral systolic pressure amplification, with lower peripheral but not central systolic pressure. Greater arterial distensibility in premenopausal women partially offsets the effects of shorter body height. After menopause, arterial distensibility is similar to that of age-matched men and does not compensate for smaller body size, resulting in a persisting increased effect of wave reflections in central arteries.


Key Words: arteries • sex • menopause


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In most industrialized populations SBP increases with age,1 although to a different degree in each sex. In younger, premenopausal women SBP is lower than in men of similar age, whereas after menopause it tends to be higher than in age-matched men. It has been shown that the incidence of cardiovascular complications increases with SBP1 2 3 4 and that an increase in the pulsatile components of blood pressure is associated with higher cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal women.5 The mechanisms associated with the sex differences in SBP and pressure pulsatility are poorly understood. The lower SBP and the lower incidence of atherosclerotic diseases and ischemic cardiovascular events in premenopausal women suggest a role for the steroid sex hormones in vascular protection and arterial function. Several studies have shown that vascular smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen receptors6 7 and that estrogens have short-term vascular effects, potentiating endothelium-dependent vasodilation in conductive and resistive arteries of postmenopausal women8 9 10 and decreasing arterial pulsatility and increasing arterial compliance.11 12 However, SBP and PP are influenced by the pattern of left ventricular ejection and aortic input impedance, principally via the distensibility of large arteries and the intensity and timing of AWRs.13 14 15 Although alterations in arterial distensibility influence SBP in the entire arterial tree, AWRs influence principally SBP and PP in the aorta and central arteries. Studies in humans have shown that body height and arterial PWV are important determinants of the effect of AWRs on SBP and PP amplitude in central arteries16 17 18 19 and on ventricular/vascular coupling.13 15 Therefore, some of the sex-related differences in blood pressure regulation and hemodynamics could be related to the generally smaller body size of women. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the respective influences of sex, body size, and menopause on arterial properties, blood pressure regulation, and ventricular/vascular coupling.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subjects
The study included 223 subjects (119 men, 104 women) with no history of cardiovascular disease. Fifty-five subjects were classified as hypertensive, blood pressure >160 (SBP) and/or 90 (DBP) mm Hg on three different occasions. These hypertensive subjects had not been treated and did not receive antihypertensive medications during the study. Subjects were divided into six groups: premenopausal normotensive women (n=44) and age-matched normotensive men (n=40), postmenopausal normotensive women (n=40) and age-matched normotensive men (n=44), and premenopausal hypertensive women (n=20) and age-matched hypertensive men (n=35). Postmenopausal women did not receive hormone replacement therapy. Each subject provided written consent for the study, which had been approved by our institutional review board.

Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer and cuff adapted to arm circumference after at least 15 minutes of recumbency. The appearance of Korotkoff sounds was taken to be the SBP and their point of disappearance (phase V) the DBP. Because of intersubject variability in the morphology of peripheral arterial pressure waves, MBP was determined by planimetry of the radial artery pressure wave contour recorded by applanation tonometry, as previously described.17 The pressure wave was calibrated to the sphygmomanometric values of SBP and DBP, and MBP was computed from the area of the pressure waveform in the corresponding HP with the use of a Sketch Pro Tablet Digitizer (Hewlett-Packard Co) and a Z-425/SX computer (Zenith Data Systems).

Ankle-Arm Pressure Index
Ankle and arm SBPs were measured simultaneously at the posterior tibial and brachial arteries at both left and right sites with an M842 8-MHz Doppler unit (Sociéte d'Electronique Générale et Appliquée [SEGA]) and a sphygmomanometer with an adapted cuff size. SBP was measured three times on each side with subjects in the supine position. The ratio of SBP at the ankle to that at the arm (ankle-arm pressure index) was calculated for each side; the lower value was used in the study. Subjects with an index less than 0.9 were not included for suspicion of lower limb arterial occlusion, and those with an index greater than 1.3 were excluded because of possible arterial "incompressibility" caused by medial calcifications.20

PWV
PWV was determined with the use of the foot-to-foot method.21 Transcutaneous Doppler flow velocity recordings were carried out simultaneously at the base of the neck over the common carotid artery and the femoral artery in the groin (aortic PWV), at the femoral and dorsalis pedis arteries (femoral PWV), and at the carotid and radial arteries (brachial PWV), with a SEGA M842 8-MHz Doppler unit and an 8188 recorder (Gould Electronique). The time delay (t) was measured between the feet of the flow waves recorded at these different points. The distance traveled by the pulse wave was measured over the body surface with a tape measure as the distance between the two recording sites minus that from the suprasternal notch to the carotid (D). PWV was calculated as D/t.21

Carotid Pressure Waveform
The aortic or central artery PP waveform in humans is generally known to manifest an inflection point (Pi) that divides the pressure waveform into early and mid-to-late (Ppk) systolic peaks22 23 (Fig 1). This pressure waveform consists of both a forward or incident wave and a backward or reflected wave.22 23 24 25 Ppk is taken to be the result of the reflected wave returning from peripheral sites and causing an increase in SBP and PP. This increase is the height of Ppk above Pi ({Delta}P) and the ratio of {Delta}P to PP (Aix; {Delta}P/PP, as a percent) represent the effect of wave reflections on the central arterial pressure wave.22 23 24 25 The {Delta}tp value represents the travel time of the pulse wave to peripheral reflecting sites and back23 24 25 (Fig 1).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plots show type A (top) and type C (bottom) carotid pressure waves according to Murgo et al.22 PP indicates pulse pressure; Ppk, late systolic peak; Pi, inflection point (early systolic peak); {Delta}P, Ppk-Pi; {Delta}tp, travel time of reflected wave; and LVET, left ventricular ejection time.

The common carotid artery pressure waveform and amplitude were recorded noninvasively with a pencil-type probe17 24 25 incorporating a high-fidelity strain-gauge transducer in the tip of the probe (model SPT-301, Millar Instruments). The strain-gauge transducer possesses a small pressure-sensitive ceramic sensor (0.5x1.0 mm) incorporating piezoresistive elements forming two arms of a Wheatstone bridge. The frequency response of the sensor is greater than 2 kHz coplanar with a larger area (7-mm diameter) of flat surface, in contact with the skin overlying the arterial pulse. The tonometer is internally calibrated (1 mV=1 mm Hg) with the use of a conventional preamplifier (TCB-500, Millar Instruments). Waveforms were recorded on a Gould 8188 recorder at 100 or 200 mm/s. The contour of the carotid pressure wave was described according to Murgo et al.22 The following parameters were measured: pulse pressure (PP), early systolic peak (Pi), late systolic peak ({Delta}P=Ppk-Pi), Aix (as {Delta}P/PP, as a percent), and {Delta}tp (in milliseconds). HP (in milliseconds) was measured between the foots of the successive pressure waves, and LVET (in milliseconds) was measured from the foot of the pressure wave to the diastolic incisura. Analysis was done by visual inspection by two independent observers with, for Aix, an interobserver SD of difference of 2.1% (ie, percentage of the mean value).26 SBP and PP may increase significantly from central to peripheral arteries. This contrasts with DBP and MBP whose pressure drops from the ascending aorta to the radial artery do not exceed 2 to 3 mm Hg.13 14 15 Therefore, carotid SBP and PP were estimated from the carotid pressure waveform, assuming that brachial and carotid DBP and MBP were equal, with the use of the HP Sketch Pro Tablet Digitizer and Zenith Z-425/SX computer. Carotid MBP on carotid pulse pressure tracing was computed from the area of the carotid pressure waveform in the corresponding HP and set equal to brachial MBP.27 Tonometric recordings showed a pressure wave with harmonic content close to that recorded intra-arterially, and previous studies in humans have also shown close relations between PP amplitude recorded by tonometry and pressures recorded by sphygmomanometry in the brachial artery or by Millar catheters in the central aorta.17 25 28

Determination of Aortic Diameters
AoDren and AoDbif were measured with a Sonel 300 ultrasound device (Compagnie Générale de Radiologie) using 3-MHz transducers. Good-quality measurements were obtained in 102 subjects. Measurements were performed by two observers, with an interobserver SD of ±1 mm (ie, percentage of mean value).26 Aortic tapering was determined as the ratio of AoDren to AoDbif (AoDren/AoDbif).

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. ANOVA and Student's t test with the Bonferroni adjustment when necessary were used to compare the different groups. Univariate and multivariate correlations were done using the least-squares method, and as a categorical variable sex was coded as 1 for men and 2 for women.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The differences observed between the groups of normotensive men and women are shown in Table 1. Younger (premenopausal) women had lower brachial and ankle SBPs (P<.05 and P<.01, respectively) and a lower ankle-arm pressure index (P<.05) than age-matched men. In contrast, carotid artery SBP was not statistically different between younger men and women. As shown in Fig 2 the increase in SBP from carotid to peripheral arteries was greater in younger men than in younger women. SBP increased with age (Table 1); in postmenopausal women ankle SBP remained lower than in age-matched men (P<.05), whereas carotid and brachial pressures were not statistically different. In the overall population the ankle-arm pressure index was positively correlated with body height (P<.001, Fig 3). Multiple regression analysis showed that this correlation was independent (P<.001) of brachial SBP and age and that for any given brachial SBP, the ankle SBP was correlated positively with height (P<.01). After adjustment for body height and age, the ankle-arm pressure index was still lower in women (P<.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Normotensive Subjects



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bar graphs show carotid, brachial, and ankle SBP in younger premenopausal (top) and older postmenopausal (bottom) normotensive women (open bars) and age-matched men (hatched bars).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scatterplot shows correlation between body height and ankle-arm pressure index in the overall population.

Brachial and femoral PWV values were significantly lower in premenopausal women (P<.05 and P<.01, respectively), but aortic PWV was not. Multivariate analysis of the younger normotensive population showed that brachial and femoral PWVs were correlated positively with age (P<.05) and SBP (P<.001) and negatively with sex (P<.05), suggesting that smaller female arteries are more distensible for any given age or pressure within the normotensive range. PWVs increased with age (P<.01), the increase being more pronounced in women who after menopause had PWVs similar to those of age-matched men.

Carotid pulse wave analysis showed that Aix was higher (P<.01) in women than in age-matched men. Aix increased with age (P<.01) and was inversely correlated with body height (P<.001). The {Delta}tp was shorter in women (P<.01) and, independently of sex, was correlated positively with body height (P<.001) and negatively with aortic PWV (P<.001). Heart period was longer in men (P<.01), and LVET was similar in men and women, with a shorter diastolic interval in women (P<.01). The slope of the correlation between HP and LVET was different in men and women (P<.02) (LVET=0.104xHP+203 in men, P<.001; LVET=0.145xHP+178 in women, P<.001). Diastolic interval (and HP) was positively correlated with body height (P<.001) independently of sex. LVET was positively correlated with Aix and was longer in subjects with a more pronounced effect of wave reflections (P<.01). The LVET/{Delta}tp and fmin/f ratio (fmin=1/[2x{Delta}tp]; f=1/HP) were increased in women (P<.01). Aortic diameters were positively correlated to body surface area (P<.001) and were decreased in women (P<.01). Aortic diameters increased with age in both sexes (P<.001). AoDren/AoDbif was negatively correlated with body surface area (P<.001, Fig 4) and was greater in women, indicating a greater degree of aortic tapering in women. With aging, AoDren/AoDbif decreased but remained greater in women than in men (P<.01). In the overall population AoDren/AoDbif was correlated positively with Aix (P<.001, Fig 5).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Scatterplot shows correlation between body surface area and AoDren/AoDbif ratio in the overall population.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Scatterplot shows correlation between AoDren/AoDbif ratio and augmentation index of carotid pressure wave.

Compared with age-matched normotensive control subjects, hypertensive premenopausal women and age-matched men had decreased arterial distensibility, an increased effect of AWR on carotid pressure, and decreased ankle-arm pressure index (Table 2). Sex differences in arterial hemodynamics were not influenced by blood pressure level and were still observed in the hypertensive subjects.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hemodynamics in Young Hypertensive Subjects


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of the present study indicate that compared with age-matched men, premenopausal women have lower SBP in peripheral arteries but not central (carotid) arteries. This augmented central-to-peripheral SBP amplification in men is related to taller body height, longer distance of pulse wave propagation, and increased arterial elastic nonuniformity with decreased distensibility of peripheral arteries. The similar carotid artery SBP in women is related to an early return and increased effect of AWRs because of shorter body height, shorter distance to reflecting sites, and increased aortic tapering.

Epidemiological studies based on brachial artery pressure measurements indicate that SBP is lower in premenopausal women than in age-matched men.1 The present results indicate that sex differences vary according to the site of pressure measurement. At the ankle, the SBP difference between men and women is even greater, so that women have a lower ankle-arm pressure index.29 Pulse amplitude and SBP generally increase as a pulse travels from the aorta toward the periphery, the increase being all the more pronounced as the distance of pulse propagation increases.13 14 15 The posterior tibial artery is more distant from the ascending aorta than the brachial artery; ankle pressure amplification is therefore greater and increases with body height (Fig 3). Because women are generally shorter than men, their peripheral pressure amplification is less marked with lower peripheral SBP and ankle-arm pressure index values. Amplification between central (carotid) and distal peripheral pressures is also influenced by nonuniform arterial elasticity and arterial geometry between the two sites of measurement.13 14 15 The reports in the literature indicate that between 20 and 50 years of age arterial distensibility is greater in women.30 31 Our results concerning the distensibility of peripheral arteries were in agreement with this. Nevertheless, in agreement with Vaitkevicius et al32 we did not observe a significant influence of sex on aortic PWV. Therefore, in men the decrease in arterial distensibility from the aorta toward peripheral arteries was more pronounced, increasing the elastic nonuniformity of the arterial tree.

Contrasting with peripheral SBP, carotid SBP was not different in men and women. This was due to the early return and increased effect of AWR in women, characterized by an increased Aix, shorter {Delta}tp, and increased LVET/{Delta}tp. Arterial distensibility (a determinant of PWV), body height, and shape (determinants of the distance and dispersion of reflecting sites) are important factors influencing the intensity and timing of AWRs.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 As arterial PWV values in men were higher or similar to those in women, the shorter {Delta}tp in women was related to shorter body height and a shorter effective length of the arterial system. At two successive arterial segments, the reflection coefficient for the pressure wave depends on the area (diameter) and PWV ratios of their junction.13 15 33 Catheterization studies of the aorta in healthy men have shown the existence of a significant discrete reflection point located in the aortic region at the level of the renal arteries.23 The present study shows that more pronounced abdominal aortic tapering (AoDren/AoDbif ratio) was associated with a higher Aix (Fig 5). Regression analysis indicated that aortic tapering was related to body size (Fig 4) but remained higher in women after adjustment for body size. Thus, the greater effect of wave reflections in women was associated with shorter body height (shorter distance to reflecting sites) and altered aortic geometry (increased tapering of the abdominal aorta, with the possible existence of a discrete reflection site at this level).23

Early return of AWRs (shorter {Delta}tp) is characteristic of a frequency shift of the first minimum of impedance modulus (fmin=1/[2x{Delta}tp]) to higher frequencies.13 14 15 To maintain optimal ventricular/vascular coupling (fmin/f ratio), a shorter {Delta}tp (increased fmin) should be paralleled by a shorter HP (ie, increased heart frequency, f), as occurs in small mammals.14 This was in fact observed in women, and despite these changes the fmin/f ratio remained higher than in men. As a determinant of end-systolic pressure the effect of AWRs is related to LVET, which tends to increase when AWRs increase. This was observed in premenopausal women, in whom for any given HP the LVET was longer compared with men, resulting in an increased LVET/{Delta}tp and different HP/LVET relationship.34 35

With aging, the effect of AWRs increases and Aix increases.24 This is due to arterial stiffening and increased PWV values. These changes are partially limited by progressive increases in arterial and aortic diameters and a tendency toward less pronounced aortic tapering. In men, the vascular aging process is progressive and regular, but in women, menopause unduly accelerates this process. In premenopausal women arterial PWVs were lower and peripheral arterial distensibility greater than in age-matched men. This could be related to the specific effects of estrogens, which increase arterial distensibility.11 12 Increased arterial distensibility in these women may partially offset the effects of shorter body height. In postmenopausal women, arterial distensibility and PWV were similar to values in age-matched men, and the effect of wave reflections in central arteries was augmented. Although with aging aortic diameters increased in both sexes and aortic shape tended to be more cylindrical, increased tapering (compared with age-matched men) was still observed in postmenopausal women, increasing the effect of AWRs in this group.

Hypertension induces several alterations in arterial hemodynamics, including an increase in arterial stiffness and an early return of wave reflections. These alterations were also observed in the present study, but hypertension did not alter the sex differences in younger subjects (Table 2).

In conclusion, the present study indicates that some sex differences in blood pressure are related to differences in body height. SBP amplification from central to peripheral arteries increases with body height and elastic nonuniformity and is therefore more pronounced in men. On the other hand, because of usually shorter body height in women, the effect of AWRs in central arteries is more pronounced in premenopausal women, and carotid SBP is not different between the two sexes. The greater arterial distensibility in premenopausal women partially compensates for the differences in body size. This compensatory effect is lost after menopause when sex differences in arterial distensibility disappear.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
Aix = augmentation index
AoDbif = internal aortic diameter above the bifurcation
AoDren = internal aortic diameter above the renal arteries
AWR = arterial wave reflection
DBP = diastolic blood pressure
HP = heart period
LVET = left ventricular ejection time
MBP = mean blood pressure
PP = pulse pressure
PWV = pulse wave velocity
SBP = systolic blood pressure
{Delta}tp = travel time of reflected wave


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by Groupe d'Etude de la Physiopathologie de l'Insuffisance Rénale (GEPIR) and a grant (BIOMED) from the European Community.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Kannel WB, Stokes J III. Hypertension as a cardiovascular risk factor. In: Robertson JIS, ed. Handbook of Hypertension. Clinical Aspects of Hypertension. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Publishing Co, Inc; 1985;6:15-34.

2. Hammond IW, Devereux RB, Alderman MH, Lutas EM, Spitzer MC, Crowley JS, Laragh JH. The prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy among employed patients with uncomplicated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:639-650. [Abstract]

3. Savage DL, Levy D, Dannenberg AL, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. Association of echocardiographic left ventricular mass with body size, blood pressure and physical activity (The Framingham study). Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:371-376. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Liebson PR, Grandits G, Prineas R, Dianzumba S, Flack JM, Cutler JA, Grimm R, Stamler J. Echocardiographic correlates of left ventricular structure among 844 mildly hypertensive men and women in the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS). Circulation. 1993;87:476-486. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, Cambien F, Guize L. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a cross-sectional analysis on cardiovascular mortality. Hypertension. 1989;13:392-400. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Karas RH, Patterson BL, Mendelsohn ME. Human vascular smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen receptor. Circulation. 1994;89:1943-1950. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J, Isner JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;89:1501-1510. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Gilligan DM, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Effects of physiological levels of estrogen on coronary vasomotor function in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;89:2545-2551. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;90:786-791. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Walsh BW, Selwyn AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Estrogen improves endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:936-941. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Gangar KF, Vyas S, Whitehead M, Crook D, Meire H, Campbell S. Pulsatility index in internal carotid artery in relation to transdermal oestradiol and time since menopause. Lancet. 1991;338:839-842. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Chelsky R, Wilson RA, Morton MJ, Burry KA, Patton PE, Szumowski J, Giraud GD. Rapid alteration of ascending aortic compliance following treatment with pergonal. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl III):III-126. Abstract.

13. O'Rourke MF. Vascular impedance: the relationship between pressure and flow. In: Arterial Function in Health and Disease. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:94-132, 185-243.

14. O'Rourke MF. Comparative physiology of the systemic arterial system. In: Arterial Function in Health and Disease. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:170-182.

15. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. Contour of pressure and flow waves in arteries. In: McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretic, Experimental and Clinical Principles. 3rd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold Publishers; 1991:216-250.

16. Hsieh KY, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Doherty JB, Kelly RP, Chen YT. Pressure wave contour in the ascending aorta of children: paradoxical similarity to the elderly. Aust N Z J Med. 1989;19:555.

17. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Benetos A, Safar ME. Increased systolic pressure in chronic uremia: role of arterial wave reflections. Hypertension. 1992;20:10-19. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier BM, Marchais SJ, Metivier F. Body height as a determinant of carotid pulse contour in humans. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):S93-S95.

19. Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Pannier BM, Levy BI, Safar ME, London GM. Wave reflections and cardiac hypertrophy in chronic uremia: influence of body size. Hypertension. 1993;22:876-883. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Carter SA. Role of pressure measurements in vascular disease. In: Bernstein EF, ed. Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Vascular Disease. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 1986:513-544.

21. Avolio AO, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang Cl, Li MF, O'Rourke MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance and left ventricular load in a Northern Chinese urban community. Circulation. 1983;68:50-58. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA. Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave forms. Circulation. 1980;62:105-116. [Free Full Text]

23. Latham RD, Westerhof M, Sipkema P, Rubal BJ, Reuderink P, Murgo JP. Regional wave travel and reflections along human aorta: a study with six simultaneous micromanometric pressures. Circulation. 1985;72:1257-1269. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation. 1989;80:1652-1659. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Kelly R, Hayward C, Ganis J, Daley J, Avolio A, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive registration of the arterial pressure pulse wave form using high-fidelity applanation tonometry. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:142-149.

26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. London GM, Pannier B, Guérin AP, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, Cuche J-L. Cardiac hypertrophy, aortic compliance, peripheral resistance, and wave reflection in end-stage renal disease: comparative effects of ACE inhibition and calcium channel blockade. Circulation. 1994;90:2786-2796. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Benetos A, Laurent S, Hoeks AP, Boutouyrie PH, Safar ME. Arterial alterations with aging and high blood pressure. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:90-97. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Hiatt WR, Hoag S, Hamman RF. Effect of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease: the San Luis Valley diabetes study. Circulation. 1995;91:1472-1479. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Laogun AA, Gosling RG. In vivo aortic compliance in man. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1982;3:201-212. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Lehman ED, Gosling RG, Parker JR, daSilva T, Taylor MG. A blood pressure independent index of aortic distensibility. Br J Radiol. 1993;66:126-131. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, O'Connor FC, Wright JG, Lakatta LE, Yin FCP, Lakatta EG. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993;88(pt 1):1456-1462.

33. Greenwald SE, Carter AC, Berry CL. Effect of age on the in vitro reflection coefficient of the aortoiliac bifurcation in humans. Circulation. 1990;82:114-123. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Weissler AM, Lewis RP, Leighton RF. The systolic time intervals as a measure of left ventricular performance in man. In: Yu PN, Goodwin JF, eds. Progress in Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1972:245-264.

35. Lewis RP, Rittgers SE, Forester WF, Boudoulas H. A critical review of systolic time intervals. Circulation. 1977;56:146-158.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Michelson, J. Harazny, R. E. Schmieder, R. Berendes, T. Fiermann, and S. Warntges
Fourier Analysis of the Envelope of the Ophthalmic Artery Blood Flow Velocity: Age- and Blood Pressure Related Impact
Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 964 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. Qiu, C. Depre, K. Ghosh, R. G. Resuello, F. F. Natividad, F. Rossi, A. Peppas, Y.-T. Shen, D. E. Vatner, and S. F. Vatner
Mechanism of Gender-Specific Differences in Aortic Stiffness With Aging in Nonhuman Primates
Circulation, August 7, 2007; 116(6): 669 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. E. Petersen, F. Wiesmann, L. E. Hudsmith, M. D. Robson, J. M. Francis, J. B. Selvanayagam, S. Neubauer, and K. M. Channon
Functional and Structural Vascular Remodeling in Elite Rowers Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 790 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
L. Stoner, M. Sabatier, K. Edge, and K. McCully
Relationship between blood velocity and conduit artery diameter and the effects of smoking on vascular responsiveness
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2139 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. E. Safar, B. I. Levy, and H. Struijker-Boudier
Current Perspectives on Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Pressure in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases
Circulation, June 10, 2003; 107(22): 2864 - 2869.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
E. Kimoto, T. Shoji, K. Shinohara, M. Inaba, Y. Okuno, T. Miki, H. Koyama, M. Emoto, and Y. Nishizawa
Preferential Stiffening of Central Over Peripheral Arteries in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 448 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron
Comparison of generalized and gender-specific transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveforms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1150 - H1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
R. Tatchum-Talom, C. Martel, and A. Marette
Influence of estrogen on aortic stiffness and endothelial function in female rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H491 - H498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. M.A.B. Van Bortel, H. A.J. Struijker-Boudier, and M. E. Safar
Pulse Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Drug Treatment of Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 914 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E.-R. Rietzschel, E. Boeykens, M. L. De Buyzere, D. A. Duprez, and D. L. Clement
A Comparison Between Systolic and Diastolic Pulse Contour Analysis in the Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness
Hypertension, June 1, 2001; 37 (6): e15 - e22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Smulyan, R. G. Asmar, A. Rudnicki, G. M. London, and M. E. Safar
Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1374 - 1380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. M. Dart and B. A. Kingwell
Pulse pressure--a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 975 - 984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
Y. Jiang, K. Kohara, and K. Hiwada
Association Between Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis and Mechanical Forces in Carotid Artery
Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2319 - 2324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. F O'Rourke, C. Vlachopoulos, and R. M Graham
Spurious systolic hypertension in youth
Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2000; 5(3): 141 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
C. S. Hayward, R. P. Kelly, and P. Collins
The roles of gender, the menopause and hormone replacement on cardiovascular function
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2000; 46(1): 28 - 49.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
Yasmin and M.J. Brown
Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness
QJM, October 1, 1999; 92(10): 595 - 600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. J. Giltay, J. Lambert, L. J. G. Gooren, J. M. H. Elbers, M. Steyn, and C. D. A. Stehouwer
Sex Steroids, Insulin, and Arterial Stiffness in Women and Men
Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 590 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
I. C. D. Westendorp, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, R. S. Reneman, A. P. G. Hoeks, N. M. Van Popele, A. Hofman, and J. C. M. Witteman
Menopausal Status and Distensibility of the Common Carotid Artery
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 1999; 19(3): 713 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. D. Cameron, B. P. McGrath, and A. M. Dart
Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1214 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. B. Lafleche, B. M. Pannier, B. Laloux, and M. E. Safar
Arterial response during cold pressor test in borderline hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H409 - H415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. Takazawa, N. Tanaka, M. Fujita, O. Matsuoka, T. Saiki, M. Aikawa, S. Tamura, and C. Ibukiyama
Assessment of Vasoactive Agents and Vascular Aging by the Second Derivative of Photoplethysmogram Waveform
Hypertension, August 1, 1998; 32(2): 365 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. S. Franklin, W. Gustin IV, N. D. Wong, M. G. Larson, M. A. Weber, W. B. Kannel, and D. Levy
Hemodynamic Patterns of Age-Related Changes in Blood Pressure : The Framingham Heart Study
Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 308 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by London, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stimpel, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by London, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Stimpel, M.