(Hypertension. 1995;26:514-519.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From Centre Hospitalier F.H. Manhes, Fleury-Merogis; INSERM U337, Paris, France; and the School of Medicine, University of Cologne (Germany) (M.S.).
Correspondence to Dr Gerard London, Centre Hospitalier F.H. Manhes, 8 Grande Rue, 91700 Fleury-Merogis, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: arteries sex menopause
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Blood Pressure
Blood pressure was measured with a mercury sphygmomanometer and
cuff adapted to arm circumference after at least 15 minutes of
recumbency. The appearance of Korotkoff sounds was taken to be the SBP
and their point of disappearance (phase V) the DBP. Because of
intersubject variability in the morphology of peripheral
arterial pressure waves, MBP was determined by planimetry
of the radial artery pressure wave contour recorded by applanation
tonometry, as previously described.17 The pressure wave
was calibrated to the sphygmomanometric values of SBP and DBP, and MBP
was computed from the area of the pressure waveform in the
corresponding HP with the use of a Sketch Pro Tablet Digitizer
(Hewlett-Packard Co) and a Z-425/SX computer (Zenith Data Systems).
Ankle-Arm Pressure Index
Ankle and arm SBPs were measured simultaneously at
the posterior tibial and brachial arteries at both left and right sites
with an M842 8-MHz Doppler unit (Sociéte d'Electronique
Générale et Appliquée [SEGA]) and a
sphygmomanometer with an adapted cuff size. SBP was measured three
times on each side with subjects in the supine position. The ratio of
SBP at the ankle to that at the arm (ankle-arm pressure index) was
calculated for each side; the lower value was used in the study.
Subjects with an index less than 0.9 were not included for suspicion of
lower limb arterial occlusion, and those with an index
greater than 1.3 were excluded because of possible arterial
"incompressibility" caused by medial
calcifications.20
PWV
PWV was determined with the use of the foot-to-foot
method.21 Transcutaneous Doppler flow velocity
recordings were carried out simultaneously at the
base of the neck over the common carotid artery and the femoral artery
in the groin (aortic PWV), at the femoral and dorsalis pedis arteries
(femoral PWV), and at the carotid and radial arteries (brachial PWV),
with a SEGA M842 8-MHz Doppler unit and an 8188 recorder (Gould
Electronique). The time delay (t) was measured between the feet of the
flow waves recorded at these different points. The distance
traveled by the pulse wave was measured over the body surface with a
tape measure as the distance between the two recording sites
minus that from the suprasternal notch to the carotid (D). PWV was
calculated as D/t.21
Carotid Pressure Waveform
The aortic or central artery PP waveform in humans is generally
known to manifest an inflection point (Pi) that divides the
pressure waveform into early and mid-to-late (Ppk) systolic
peaks22 23 (Fig 1). This
pressure waveform consists of both a forward or incident wave and a
backward or reflected wave.22 23 24 25 Ppk is taken
to be the result of the reflected wave returning from
peripheral sites and causing an increase in SBP and PP.
This increase is the height of Ppk above Pi
(
P) and the ratio of
P to PP (Aix;
P/PP, as a percent)
represent the effect of wave reflections on the central
arterial pressure wave.22 23 24 25 The
tp value
represents the travel time of the pulse wave to
peripheral reflecting sites and back23 24 25 (Fig 1).
|
The common carotid artery pressure waveform and amplitude were
recorded noninvasively with a pencil-type
probe17 24 25 incorporating a high-fidelity strain-gauge
transducer in the tip of the probe (model SPT-301, Millar Instruments).
The strain-gauge transducer possesses a small pressure-sensitive
ceramic sensor (0.5x1.0 mm) incorporating piezoresistive elements
forming two arms of a Wheatstone bridge. The frequency response of the
sensor is greater than 2 kHz coplanar with a larger area (7-mm
diameter) of flat surface, in contact with the skin overlying the
arterial pulse. The tonometer is internally calibrated (1
mV=1 mm Hg) with the use of a conventional preamplifier (TCB-500,
Millar Instruments). Waveforms were recorded on a Gould 8188
recorder at 100 or 200 mm/s. The contour of the carotid pressure
wave was described according to Murgo et al.22 The
following parameters were measured: pulse pressure (PP),
early systolic peak (Pi), late systolic peak
(
P=Ppk-Pi), Aix (as
P/PP, as
a percent), and
tp (in milliseconds). HP (in milliseconds) was
measured between the foots of the successive pressure waves, and LVET
(in milliseconds) was measured from the foot of the pressure wave to
the diastolic incisura. Analysis was done by visual
inspection by two independent observers with, for Aix, an interobserver
SD of difference of 2.1% (ie, percentage of the mean
value).26 SBP and PP may increase significantly from
central to peripheral arteries. This contrasts with DBP and
MBP whose pressure drops from the ascending aorta to the radial artery
do not exceed 2 to 3 mm Hg.13 14 15 Therefore, carotid SBP
and PP were estimated from the carotid pressure waveform, assuming that
brachial and carotid DBP and MBP were equal, with the use of the HP
Sketch Pro Tablet Digitizer and Zenith Z-425/SX computer. Carotid MBP
on carotid pulse pressure tracing was computed from the area of the
carotid pressure waveform in the corresponding HP and set equal to
brachial MBP.27 Tonometric recordings showed a
pressure wave with harmonic content close to that recorded
intra-arterially, and previous studies in humans have also
shown close relations between PP amplitude recorded by tonometry
and pressures recorded by sphygmomanometry in the brachial artery
or by Millar catheters in the central aorta.17 25 28
Determination of Aortic Diameters
AoDren and AoDbif were measured with a
Sonel 300 ultrasound device (Compagnie Générale de
Radiologie) using 3-MHz transducers. Good-quality measurements were
obtained in 102 subjects. Measurements were performed by two observers,
with an interobserver SD of ±1 mm (ie, percentage of mean
value).26 Aortic tapering was determined as the ratio of
AoDren to AoDbif
(AoDren/AoDbif).
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SD. ANOVA and Student's
t test with the Bonferroni adjustment when necessary were
used to compare the different groups. Univariate and
multivariate correlations were done using the
least-squares method, and as a categorical variable sex was coded
as 1 for men and 2 for women.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Brachial and femoral PWV values were significantly lower in premenopausal women (P<.05 and P<.01, respectively), but aortic PWV was not. Multivariate analysis of the younger normotensive population showed that brachial and femoral PWVs were correlated positively with age (P<.05) and SBP (P<.001) and negatively with sex (P<.05), suggesting that smaller female arteries are more distensible for any given age or pressure within the normotensive range. PWVs increased with age (P<.01), the increase being more pronounced in women who after menopause had PWVs similar to those of age-matched men.
Carotid pulse wave analysis showed that Aix was higher
(P<.01) in women than in age-matched men. Aix increased
with age (P<.01) and was inversely correlated with body
height (P<.001). The
tp was shorter in women
(P<.01) and, independently of sex, was correlated
positively with body height (P<.001) and negatively with
aortic PWV (P<.001). Heart period was longer in men
(P<.01), and LVET was similar in men and women, with a
shorter diastolic interval in women (P<.01).
The slope of the correlation between HP and LVET was different in men
and women (P<.02) (LVET=0.104xHP+203 in men,
P<.001; LVET=0.145xHP+178 in women, P<.001).
Diastolic interval (and HP) was positively correlated with
body height (P<.001) independently of sex. LVET was
positively correlated with Aix and was longer in subjects with a more
pronounced effect of wave reflections (P<.01). The
LVET/
tp and fmin/f ratio
(fmin=1/[2x
tp]; f=1/HP) were increased in women
(P<.01). Aortic diameters were positively correlated to
body surface area (P<.001) and were decreased in women
(P<.01). Aortic diameters increased with age in both sexes
(P<.001). AoDren/AoDbif was
negatively correlated with body surface area (P<.001, Fig 4) and was greater in women, indicating a greater degree
of aortic tapering in women. With aging,
AoDren/AoDbif decreased but remained
greater in women than in men (P<.01). In the overall
population AoDren/AoDbif was correlated
positively with Aix (P<.001, Fig 5).
|
|
Compared with age-matched normotensive control subjects, hypertensive premenopausal women and age-matched men had decreased arterial distensibility, an increased effect of AWR on carotid pressure, and decreased ankle-arm pressure index (Table 2). Sex differences in arterial hemodynamics were not influenced by blood pressure level and were still observed in the hypertensive subjects.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiological studies based on brachial artery pressure measurements indicate that SBP is lower in premenopausal women than in age-matched men.1 The present results indicate that sex differences vary according to the site of pressure measurement. At the ankle, the SBP difference between men and women is even greater, so that women have a lower ankle-arm pressure index.29 Pulse amplitude and SBP generally increase as a pulse travels from the aorta toward the periphery, the increase being all the more pronounced as the distance of pulse propagation increases.13 14 15 The posterior tibial artery is more distant from the ascending aorta than the brachial artery; ankle pressure amplification is therefore greater and increases with body height (Fig 3). Because women are generally shorter than men, their peripheral pressure amplification is less marked with lower peripheral SBP and ankle-arm pressure index values. Amplification between central (carotid) and distal peripheral pressures is also influenced by nonuniform arterial elasticity and arterial geometry between the two sites of measurement.13 14 15 The reports in the literature indicate that between 20 and 50 years of age arterial distensibility is greater in women.30 31 Our results concerning the distensibility of peripheral arteries were in agreement with this. Nevertheless, in agreement with Vaitkevicius et al32 we did not observe a significant influence of sex on aortic PWV. Therefore, in men the decrease in arterial distensibility from the aorta toward peripheral arteries was more pronounced, increasing the elastic nonuniformity of the arterial tree.
Contrasting with peripheral SBP, carotid SBP was not
different in men and women. This was due to the early return and
increased effect of AWR in women, characterized by an increased Aix,
shorter
tp, and increased LVET/
tp. Arterial
distensibility (a determinant of PWV), body height, and shape
(determinants of the distance and dispersion of reflecting sites) are
important factors influencing the intensity and timing of
AWRs.13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 As arterial PWV values in men
were higher or similar to those in women, the shorter
tp in women
was related to shorter body height and a shorter effective length of
the arterial system. At two successive arterial
segments, the reflection coefficient for the pressure wave depends on
the area (diameter) and PWV ratios of their
junction.13 15 33 Catheterization studies
of the aorta in healthy men have shown the existence of a
significant discrete reflection point located in the aortic region at
the level of the renal arteries.23 The present study
shows that more pronounced abdominal aortic tapering
(AoDren/AoDbif ratio) was associated
with a higher Aix (Fig 5). Regression analysis
indicated that aortic tapering was related to body size (Fig 4) but remained higher in women after adjustment for
body size. Thus, the greater effect of wave reflections in women was
associated with shorter body height (shorter distance to reflecting
sites) and altered aortic geometry (increased tapering of the abdominal
aorta, with the possible existence of a discrete reflection site at
this level).23
Early return of AWRs (shorter
tp) is characteristic of a
frequency shift of the first minimum of impedance modulus
(fmin=1/[2x
tp]) to higher
frequencies.13 14 15 To maintain optimal
ventricular/vascular coupling (fmin/f
ratio), a shorter
tp (increased fmin) should be
paralleled by a shorter HP (ie, increased heart frequency, f),
as occurs in small mammals.14 This was in fact observed in
women, and despite these changes the fmin/f ratio
remained higher than in men. As a determinant of end-systolic pressure
the effect of AWRs is related to LVET, which tends to increase when
AWRs increase. This was observed in premenopausal women, in whom for
any given HP the LVET was longer compared with men, resulting in an
increased LVET/
tp and different HP/LVET
relationship.34 35
With aging, the effect of AWRs increases and Aix increases.24 This is due to arterial stiffening and increased PWV values. These changes are partially limited by progressive increases in arterial and aortic diameters and a tendency toward less pronounced aortic tapering. In men, the vascular aging process is progressive and regular, but in women, menopause unduly accelerates this process. In premenopausal women arterial PWVs were lower and peripheral arterial distensibility greater than in age-matched men. This could be related to the specific effects of estrogens, which increase arterial distensibility.11 12 Increased arterial distensibility in these women may partially offset the effects of shorter body height. In postmenopausal women, arterial distensibility and PWV were similar to values in age-matched men, and the effect of wave reflections in central arteries was augmented. Although with aging aortic diameters increased in both sexes and aortic shape tended to be more cylindrical, increased tapering (compared with age-matched men) was still observed in postmenopausal women, increasing the effect of AWRs in this group.
Hypertension induces several alterations in arterial hemodynamics, including an increase in arterial stiffness and an early return of wave reflections. These alterations were also observed in the present study, but hypertension did not alter the sex differences in younger subjects (Table 2).
In conclusion, the present study indicates that some sex differences in blood pressure are related to differences in body height. SBP amplification from central to peripheral arteries increases with body height and elastic nonuniformity and is therefore more pronounced in men. On the other hand, because of usually shorter body height in women, the effect of AWRs in central arteries is more pronounced in premenopausal women, and carotid SBP is not different between the two sexes. The greater arterial distensibility in premenopausal women partially compensates for the differences in body size. This compensatory effect is lost after menopause when sex differences in arterial distensibility disappear.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Hammond IW, Devereux RB, Alderman MH, Lutas EM, Spitzer MC, Crowley JS, Laragh JH. The prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy among employed patients with uncomplicated hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;7:639-650. [Abstract]
3. Savage DL, Levy D, Dannenberg AL, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP. Association of echocardiographic left ventricular mass with body size, blood pressure and physical activity (The Framingham study). Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:371-376. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Liebson PR, Grandits G, Prineas R, Dianzumba S, Flack
JM, Cutler JA, Grimm R, Stamler J.
Echocardiographic correlates of left
ventricular structure among 844 mildly hypertensive men and
women in the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS).
Circulation. 1993;87:476-486.
5.
Darne B, Girerd X, Safar M, Cambien F, Guize
L. Pulsatile versus steady component of blood pressure: a
cross-sectional analysis on cardiovascular
mortality. Hypertension. 1989;13:392-400.
6.
Karas RH, Patterson BL, Mendelsohn ME.
Human vascular smooth muscle cells contain functional estrogen
receptor. Circulation. 1994;89:1943-1950.
7.
Losordo DW, Kearney M, Kim EA, Jekanowski J,
Isner JM. Variable expression of the estrogen receptor in
normal and atherosclerotic coronary arteries of premenopausal
women. Circulation. 1994;89:1501-1510.
8.
Gilligan DM, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO. Effects of
physiological levels of estrogen on
coronary vasomotor function in postmenopausal women.
Circulation. 1994;89:2545-2551.
9.
Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon
RO. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal
women. Circulation. 1994;90:786-791.
10.
Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Uehata A, Walsh BW, Selwyn
AP, Ganz P, Yeung AC, Creager MA. Estrogen improves
endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation in
postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:936-941.
11. Gangar KF, Vyas S, Whitehead M, Crook D, Meire H, Campbell S. Pulsatility index in internal carotid artery in relation to transdermal oestradiol and time since menopause. Lancet. 1991;338:839-842. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Chelsky R, Wilson RA, Morton MJ, Burry KA, Patton PE, Szumowski J, Giraud GD. Rapid alteration of ascending aortic compliance following treatment with pergonal. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl III):III-126. Abstract.
13. O'Rourke MF. Vascular impedance: the relationship between pressure and flow. In: Arterial Function in Health and Disease. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:94-132, 185-243.
14. O'Rourke MF. Comparative physiology of the systemic arterial system. In: Arterial Function in Health and Disease. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1982:170-182.
15. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. Contour of pressure and flow waves in arteries. In: McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretic, Experimental and Clinical Principles. 3rd ed. London, UK: Edward Arnold Publishers; 1991:216-250.
16. Hsieh KY, O'Rourke MF, Avolio AP, Doherty JB, Kelly RP, Chen YT. Pressure wave contour in the ascending aorta of children: paradoxical similarity to the elderly. Aust N Z J Med. 1989;19:555.
17.
London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Benetos
A, Safar ME. Increased systolic pressure in chronic uremia: role
of arterial wave reflections.
Hypertension. 1992;20:10-19.
18. London GM, Guerin AP, Pannier BM, Marchais SJ, Metivier F. Body height as a determinant of carotid pulse contour in humans. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):S93-S95.
19.
Marchais SJ, Guerin AP, Pannier BM, Levy BI, Safar ME, London
GM. Wave reflections and cardiac hypertrophy in
chronic uremia: influence of body size.
Hypertension. 1993;22:876-883.
20. Carter SA. Role of pressure measurements in vascular disease. In: Bernstein EF, ed. Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Vascular Disease. 3rd ed. St Louis, Mo: CV Mosby Co; 1986:513-544.
21.
Avolio AO, Chen SG, Wang RP, Zhang Cl, Li MF, O'Rourke
MF. Effects of aging on changing arterial compliance
and left ventricular load in a Northern Chinese urban
community. Circulation. 1983;68:50-58.
22.
Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA.
Aortic input impedance in normal man: relationship to pressure wave
forms. Circulation. 1980;62:105-116.
23.
Latham RD, Westerhof M, Sipkema P, Rubal BJ, Reuderink
P, Murgo JP. Regional wave travel and reflections along human
aorta: a study with six simultaneous micromanometric
pressures. Circulation. 1985;72:1257-1269.
24.
Kelly R, Hayward C, Avolio A, O'Rourke M.
Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human
arterial pulse. Circulation. 1989;80:1652-1659.
25. Kelly R, Hayward C, Ganis J, Daley J, Avolio A, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive registration of the arterial pressure pulse wave form using high-fidelity applanation tonometry. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:142-149.
26. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
London GM, Pannier B, Guérin AP, Marchais SJ,
Safar ME, Cuche J-L. Cardiac hypertrophy, aortic
compliance, peripheral resistance, and wave reflection in
end-stage renal disease: comparative effects of ACE inhibition and
calcium channel blockade. Circulation. 1994;90:2786-2796.
28.
Benetos A, Laurent S, Hoeks AP, Boutouyrie PH, Safar
ME. Arterial alterations with aging and high blood
pressure. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:90-97.
29.
Hiatt WR, Hoag S, Hamman RF. Effect of
diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of
peripheral arterial disease: the San Luis
Valley diabetes study. Circulation. 1995;91:1472-1479.
30. Laogun AA, Gosling RG. In vivo aortic compliance in man. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1982;3:201-212. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Lehman ED, Gosling RG, Parker JR, daSilva T, Taylor
MG. A blood pressure independent index of aortic
distensibility. Br J Radiol. 1993;66:126-131.
32. Vaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, O'Connor FC, Wright JG, Lakatta LE, Yin FCP, Lakatta EG. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993;88(pt 1):1456-1462.
33.
Greenwald SE, Carter AC, Berry CL. Effect of age
on the in vitro reflection coefficient of the aortoiliac bifurcation in
humans. Circulation. 1990;82:114-123.
34. Weissler AM, Lewis RP, Leighton RF. The systolic time intervals as a measure of left ventricular performance in man. In: Yu PN, Goodwin JF, eds. Progress in Cardiology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1972:245-264.
35.
Lewis RP, Rittgers SE, Forester WF, Boudoulas H.
A critical review of systolic time intervals.
Circulation. 1977;56:146-158.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Michelson, J. Harazny, R. E. Schmieder, R. Berendes, T. Fiermann, and S. Warntges Fourier Analysis of the Envelope of the Ophthalmic Artery Blood Flow Velocity: Age- and Blood Pressure Related Impact Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 964 - 969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Qiu, C. Depre, K. Ghosh, R. G. Resuello, F. F. Natividad, F. Rossi, A. Peppas, Y.-T. Shen, D. E. Vatner, and S. F. Vatner Mechanism of Gender-Specific Differences in Aortic Stiffness With Aging in Nonhuman Primates Circulation, August 7, 2007; 116(6): 669 - 676. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Petersen, F. Wiesmann, L. E. Hudsmith, M. D. Robson, J. M. Francis, J. B. Selvanayagam, S. Neubauer, and K. M. Channon Functional and Structural Vascular Remodeling in Elite Rowers Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 15, 2006; 48(4): 790 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Stoner, M. Sabatier, K. Edge, and K. McCully Relationship between blood velocity and conduit artery diameter and the effects of smoking on vascular responsiveness J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2004; 96(6): 2139 - 2145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Safar, B. I. Levy, and H. Struijker-Boudier Current Perspectives on Arterial Stiffness and Pulse Pressure in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases Circulation, June 10, 2003; 107(22): 2864 - 2869. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kimoto, T. Shoji, K. Shinohara, M. Inaba, Y. Okuno, T. Miki, H. Koyama, M. Emoto, and Y. Nishizawa Preferential Stiffening of Central Over Peripheral Arteries in Type 2 Diabetes Diabetes, February 1, 2003; 52(2): 448 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Hope, D. B. Tay, I. T. Meredith, and J. D. Cameron Comparison of generalized and gender-specific transfer functions for the derivation of aortic waveforms Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1150 - H1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Tatchum-Talom, C. Martel, and A. Marette Influence of estrogen on aortic stiffness and endothelial function in female rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H491 - H498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M.A.B. Van Bortel, H. A.J. Struijker-Boudier, and M. E. Safar Pulse Pressure, Arterial Stiffness, and Drug Treatment of Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-R. Rietzschel, E. Boeykens, M. L. De Buyzere, D. A. Duprez, and D. L. Clement A Comparison Between Systolic and Diastolic Pulse Contour Analysis in the Evaluation of Arterial Stiffness Hypertension, June 1, 2001; 37 (6): e15 - e22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Smulyan, R. G. Asmar, A. Rudnicki, G. M. London, and M. E. Safar Comparative effects of aging in men and women on the properties of the arterial tree J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1374 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Dart and B. A. Kingwell Pulse pressure--a review of mechanisms and clinical relevance J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2001; 37(4): 975 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jiang, K. Kohara, and K. Hiwada Association Between Risk Factors for Atherosclerosis and Mechanical Forces in Carotid Artery Stroke, October 1, 2000; 31(10): 2319 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F O'Rourke, C. Vlachopoulos, and R. M Graham Spurious systolic hypertension in youth Vascular Medicine, August 1, 2000; 5(3): 141 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Hayward, R. P. Kelly, and P. Collins The roles of gender, the menopause and hormone replacement on cardiovascular function Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2000; 46(1): 28 - 49. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Yasmin and M.J. Brown Similarities and differences between augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in the assessment of arterial stiffness QJM, October 1, 1999; 92(10): 595 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Giltay, J. Lambert, L. J. G. Gooren, J. M. H. Elbers, M. Steyn, and C. D. A. Stehouwer Sex Steroids, Insulin, and Arterial Stiffness in Women and Men Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 590 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. D. Westendorp, M. L. Bots, D. E. Grobbee, R. S. Reneman, A. P. G. Hoeks, N. M. Van Popele, A. Hofman, and J. C. M. Witteman Menopausal Status and Distensibility of the Common Carotid Artery Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 1999; 19(3): 713 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Cameron, B. P. McGrath, and A. M. Dart Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1998; 32(5): 1214 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Lafleche, B. M. Pannier, B. Laloux, and M. E. Safar Arterial response during cold pressor test in borderline hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 1998; 275(2): H409 - H415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Takazawa, N. Tanaka, M. Fujita, O. Matsuoka, T. Saiki, M. Aikawa, S. Tamura, and C. Ibukiyama Assessment of Vasoactive Agents and Vascular Aging by the Second Derivative of Photoplethysmogram Waveform Hypertension, August 1, 1998; 32(2): 365 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Franklin, W. Gustin IV, N. D. Wong, M. G. Larson, M. A. Weber, W. B. Kannel, and D. Levy Hemodynamic Patterns of Age-Related Changes in Blood Pressure : The Framingham Heart Study Circulation, July 1, 1997; 96(1): 308 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |