Hypertension. 1995;26:1089-1092
(Hypertension. 1995;26:1089-1092.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Insulin Effect on Renal Sodium Reabsorption in Adolescent Offspring of Essential Hypertensive Parents
B. Grunfeld;
M. Gimenez;
M. Balzaretti;
L. Rabinovich;
M. Romo;
R. Simsolo
From the Hypertension Clinic, Hospital de Niños "Ricardo
Gutierrez," Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Correspondence to Beatriz Grunfeld, La Pampa 3635, Buenos Aires 1430, Argentina.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Abstract We previously showed that children and adolescent
offspring
of patients with essential hypertension have an increased
proximal
renal sodium reabsorption as measured by lithium fractional
excretion.
Insulin has been shown to have
antinatriuretic properties and
to be increased
(hyperinsulinemia) in essential hypertension.
The
aim of this study was to evaluate the role of insulin on
the increased
proximal renal sodium reabsorption previously
reported. Lithium and
sodium fractional excretions were measured
3 hours before and 3 hours
after an intravenous glucose tolerance
test in 20
normotensive adolescents with a family history of
essential
hypertension (F+, 14.8±0.5 years) and 10 normotensive
control subjects
without a family history of hypertension (F-,
15.2±0.9 years).
Results are mean±SEM. Lithium
fractional excretion before glucose
loading was 16.1±1.8%
in F+ versus 23.5±2.0% in F-
(
P<.02) and after glucose
loading was 14.7±1.3% in F+
versus 20.9±1.7% in
F- (
P=NS). Lithium fractional
excretion did not change after
intravenous glucose loading
in either group. The insulin area
under the curve was 2815±499 in F+
versus 2290±418
µU/mL per hour in F- (
P=NS). There was
no correlation
between lithium fractional excretion and insulin area
under
the curve. Fractional excretion of sodium before glucose loading
was
0.99±0.1% in F+ versus 0.99±0.1% in F- (
P=NS)
and
after glucose loading was 0.77±0.1 in F+ versus 0.85+0.1%
in F-
(
P<.01 versus values before loading in both groups).
In
summary lithium fractional excretion did not change after
the
intravenous glucose loading, and no correlation was found
with
insulin levels. Thus, insulin does not appear to be involved
in
the decreased lithium fractional excretion in F+. However,
sodium
fractional excretion diminished significantly after the
intravenous
glucose loading. Therefore, our findings in
physiological conditions
in humans show that one
possible role of insulin in the development
of hypertension is through
an antinatriuretic effect distal
to the proximal
tubule.
Key Words: insulin hypertension, genetic sodium
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Hyperinsulinemia and
insulin resistance have been extensively
reported in adults with
hypertension, raising the hypothesis
that insulin may be involved in
the pathogenesis of essential
hypertension.
1 2 Such a
hypothesis is strengthened by studies
demonstrating that normotensive
adolescents and men with a family
history of hypertension are insulin
resistant and tend to show
higher fasting serum insulin
levels.
3 4
It has been suggested that hyperinsulinemia could
lead to hypertension by means of its known sodium-retaining effect,
among other effects.5 6 In hypertensive patients adequate
renal sodium excretion is achieved only at elevated blood
pressures.7 This rightward shift of the
pressure-natriuresis curve may be the consequence of alterations in
renal hemodynamics, but it also could be due to
abnormalities of renal tubule sodium reabsorption.8
We and others previously reported an increased sodium reabsorption in
the proximal tubule of normotensive offspring of parents with essential
hypertension.9 10 Thus, the aim of the present study
was to evaluate the role of the insulin response to an
intravenous glucose load in the increased proximal renal
sodium reabsorption found in offspring of hypertensive parents.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Twenty F+ (mean±SEM) (14.8+0.5 years) and 10 F- (15.2+0.9
years)
matched for BMI and pubertal stage (Tanner stages III and IV)
were
included in the study. All subjects were studied at the
Hypertension
Clinic of our medical center, were healthy, and were
taking
no medication.
Blood pressure of parents was assessed personally by one of the
authors. Procedures were explained carefully to both parents and
children, and informed consent was obtained from parents.
All subjects came to the clinic after an overnight fast and after
receiving 300 mg/m2 of lithium carbonate at 10
PM the night before. At 6 AM subjects emptied
their bladders completely, and urine was collected until 9
AM for measurement of sodium, potassium,
creatinine, and lithium. At 9 AM a
butterfly-like needle was placed in an antecubital vein and a blood
specimen was obtained for measurement of glucose, insulin, lithium,
creatinine, sodium, and potassium. An
intravenous glucose load (0.25 g/kg, 25% solution) was
then infused over
2 minutes in a contralateral vein. Blood samples
were obtained at 1, 3, 5, and 7 minutes after glucose injection for
measurement of insulin and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes for
insulin and glucose. A second urine collection was performed between 9
AM and noon for sodium, potassium, creatinine,
and lithium. Patients received an oral water load (20 mL/kg and
diuresis) throughout the study. Sodium, potassium, and
creatinine levels were measured by an automated method
(Beckman Instruments). Lithium was measured by atomic absorption
spectophotometry (Perkin Elmer), and insulin was measured by
radioimmunoassay.
For statistical analysis comparisons between and within groups
were calculated by paired and unpaired t tests. Pearson
correlation coefficients were used to assess relations between
variables. A value of P<.05 was accepted as
significant. Findings are expressed as mean±SEM.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Table 1
shows clinical findings of subjects.
There were no significant
differences in BMI, creatinine
clearance, or systolic and diastolic
blood pressure
between F+ and F-.
Table 2 shows the calculated variables both before
and after the IVGTT. FeLi was significantly lower in the F+
(16.1±1.8% in F+ versus 23.5±2.0% in F-; P<.02) and
did not change after the intravenous glucose load in either
group (14.7±1.3% in F+ versus 20.9±1.7% in F-, respectively;
P=NS versus before IVGTT) (Fig 1). The IAUC
was comparable in both groups (2815±499 µU/mL per hour in F+ versus
2290±418 µU/mL per hour in F-; P=NS). There was no
correlation between FeLi and IAUC (Fig 2). FeNa was
similar in both groups (0.99±0.1% F+ versus 0.99±0.1% in F-;
P=NS) and decreased significantly after the
intravenous glucose load to a comparable extent in both
groups (0.77+0.13% in F+ versus 0.85±0.1% in F-; P<.01
versus before IVGTT) (Fig 3). No correlation was found
between FeNa and IAUC. Fractional excretion of potassium was similar
before and after intravenous glucose loading in both
groups.
When we segregated the F+ according to IAUC level (<2500 or
>2500 U/mL per hour), on the basis of our previous findings in
normotensive adolescents with normal BMI we could establish that FeNa
decreased significantly in adolescents with the higher insulin levels
(1.02±0.16 before IVGTT versus 0.67±0.19 after IVGTT;
P<.005), whereas no change could be detected in adolescents
with lower IAUC levels (0.95±0.14 before IVGTT and 0.88±0.17 after
IVGTT; P=NS) (Fig 4).
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Our findings indicate that F+ have an increased renal proximal
sodium
reabsorption as measured by FeLi when compared with F- matched
for
BMI and pubertal stage. Insulin may not account for this finding,
since
no relation could be established between the FeLi and either
basal
insulin or the IAUC after an intravenous glucose
challenge.
Moreover, no significant change in the FeLi was observed in
either
group after hyperinsulinemia ensuing from
the intravenous glucose
load. In contrast, FeNa decreased
significantly after glucose
loading in both groups under study. To our
knowledge this is
the first study evaluating the in vivo effects of
endogenous
insulin on sodium reabsorption that suggests
that the antinatriuretic
effect may be distal to
the proximal tubule.
Although the sodium-retaining effects of insulin have been known
for a long time11 the mechanisms involved and the site of
insulin action both have been controversial matters.12
Several studies indicated that insulin may control sodium reabsorption
along the whole nephron. The ability of insulin to increase sodium
reabsorption in the proximal convoluted tubule has been established
convincingly in in vitro studies.13 14 In contrast, in
vivo studies in animals failed to demonstrate increased proximal tubule
sodium reabsorption during insulin antinatriuresis,15 16
suggesting that the antinatriuretic effect of
insulin is exerted predominantly in postproximal tubules.
Feraille et al17 showed time and dose dependence of
insulin action in rats on sodium reabsorption along the different
nephron segments. Thus, although the collecting ducts were less
sensitive, they displayed an earlier response to insulin than the
proximal tubules. Furthermore, the threshold concentrations of insulin
on sodium reabsorption were found to lie in the proximal tubule and
thick ascending limb within the fasting range, whereas it was within
the range of postprandial stimulated plasma insulin concentrations in
the collecting tubules. The above could in part explain our findings of
an antinatriuretic effect of insulin distal to the
proximal tubules. Finally, previous studies conducted in humans
indicated that exogenous insulin increases sodium reabsorption despite
either no changes or a slight decrease in proximal sodium reabsorption,
again supporting a postproximal tubule site for insulin
action.5 6 18 19
Although specific insulin-binding sites were demonstrated along the
entire nephron the number of insulin binding sites and affinity
constants varied significantly among different nephron segments, with
the greatest number of insulin binding sites of high affinity found in
proximal and distal convoluted tubule segments.20 Our
present and past findings3 further support previous
contentions21 22 that insulin resistance associated with
essential hypertension is relatively selective for glucose
metabolism in certain target tissues and that
hyperinsulinemia may result in increased insulin
effects in areas where insulin sensitivity is preserved such as the
renal tubule.
Mean insulin levels and mean IAUC after an intravenous
glucose challenge in the F+ included in the present study were
similar to those of the F- at variance with our previous
findings.3 This is explained by the fact that obese
children were included in both groups because we were presently
interested only in the role of endogenous insulin on sodium
handling.
FeLi has been shown to accurately reflect proximal tubule sodium
reabsorption in sodium-replete humans.23 The increased
renal proximal sodium reabsorption found in offspring of hypertensive
parents was related to the family history of hypertension and was
independent of the BMI.
Renal blood flow has been shown to be lower and filtration fraction and
renal vascular resistance higher in children of hypertensive parents at
such an early age as 11 years old compared with children of
normotensive parents.24 A rise in filtration fraction
increases peritubular capillary oncotic pressure because more
ultrafiltrate is formed and plasma proteins become more concentrated,
thus enhancing the uptake of sodium and water.25
A diminished FeLi reflecting an increased renal proximal sodium
reabsorption in these high-risk adolescents may indicate a
physiological adaptive mechanism to the
hemodynamic changes described in this population. An
increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system26
and/or the renin-angiotensin system27 also
could account for the increased proximal sodium reabsorption.
In summary normotensive adolescent offspring of hypertensive parents
have an increased renal proximal sodium reabsorption that is not
related to endogenous insulin levels. However, FeNa
diminished after the insulin response to the intravenous
glucose load. Therefore, our findings under
physiological conditions in humans show that one
possible role of insulin in the development of hypertension may be
exerted through an antinatriuretic effect distal to
the proximal tubule.
 |
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
|
|---|
| BMI |
= |
body mass index |
| F+ |
= |
normotensive adolescents with a family history of essential
hypertension |
| F- |
= |
normotensive (control) adolescents without a family history of
hypertension |
| FeLi |
= |
fractional excretion of lithium |
| FeNa |
= |
fractional excretion of sodium |
| IAUC |
= |
insulin area under the curve |
| IVGTT |
= |
intravenous glucose tolerance test |
|
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
This work was supported by grant CONICET National Research
Council
for Science and Technology, Argentina PID 3340/92.
Received June 19, 1995;
first decision August 1, 1995;
accepted October 6, 1995.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Ferrannini E, Buzzigoli R, Bonadona R, Giorico MA,
Olegigini M, Graziadei L, Pedrinelli R, Brandi L, Bebvilaqua S.
Insulin resistance in essential hypertension.
N Engl J Med. 1987;317:350-357. [Abstract]
-
Shen D-C, Shei S-M, Fuh M-T, Wu D-A, Chen Y-DI, Reaven
GM. Resistance to insulin stimulated glucose uptake in patients
with hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab. 1988;66:580-583. [Abstract]
-
Grunfeld B, Balzaretti M, Romo M, Gimenez M, Gutman R.
Hyperinsulinemia in normotensive offspring
of hypertensive parents. Hypertension.
1994;23(suppl I):I-12-I-15.
-
Beatty OL, Harper R, Sheridan B, Atkinson AB, Bell PM.
Insulin resistance in offspring of hypertensive parents.
Br Med J. 1993;307:92-96.
-
DeFronzo RA, Cooke CR, Andres R, Falcone GR, Davis PJ.
The effects of insulin on renal handling of sodium, potassium,
calcium and phosphate in man. J Clin
Invest. 1975;55:845-855.
-
Skott P, Hother-Nielsen O, Bruun EN, Giese J,
Beck-Nielsen H, Parving HH. Effects of insulin on kidney
function and sodium excretion in healthy subjects.
Diabetologia. 1989;32:694-699. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Guyton AC, Langston JB, Navar G. Theory for
renal autoregulation by feedback at the juxtaglomerular
apparatus. Circ Res.
1964;14/15(suppl I):I-187-I-197.
-
Luke RG. Essential hypertension: a renal
disease? A review and update of the evidence.
Hypertension. 1993;21:380-390. [Free Full Text]
-
Grunfeld B, Simsolo R, Romo M, Gimenez M. Na:Li
countertransport in erythrocytes does not correlate with either
increase renal proximal tubule reabsorption or decrease fractional uric
acid excretion in normotensive children offspring of hypertensive
parents. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:67. Abstract.
-
Burnier M, Biollaz J, Magnin JL, Bidlingmeyer M,
Brunner HR. Renal sodium handling in patients with untreated
hypertension and white coat hypertension.
Hypertension. 1993;23:496-502. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miller JH, Bogdonoff MD.
Antidiuresis associated with administration of
insulin. J Appl Physiol. 1953;6:509-512.
-
Gupta AK, Clark RV, Kirchner KA. Effects of
insulin on renal sodium excretion.
Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl I):I-78-I-82.
-
Hammerman MR, Rogers S, Hansen VA, Gavin JR III.
Insulin stimulates Pi transport in brush border vesicles from
proximal tubular segments. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:E616-E624. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baum M. Insulin stimulates volume absorption in
the rabbit proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin
Invest. 1987;74:1104-1109.
-
De Fronzo RA, Goldberg M, Agus ZS. The effects
of glucose and insulin on renal electrolyte transport.
J Clin Invest. 1976;58:83-90.
-
Kirchner KA. Insulin increases loop segment
chloride reabsorption in the euglycemic rat.
Am J Physiol. 1988;255:F1206-F1213. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feraille E, Marsy S, Cheval L, Barlet-Bac C, Khadouri
C, Favre H, Doucet A. Sites of
antinatriuretic action of insulin along rat
nephron. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:F175-F179. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stevinkel P, Bolinder J, Alvestrand A. Effects
of insulin on renal haemodynamics and the proximal and distal tubular
sodium handling in healthy subjects. Diabetologia. 1992;35:1042-1048. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Abouchacra S, Baines AD, Zinman B, Skorecki KL, Logan
AG. Insulin blunts the natriuretic action of atrial
natriuretic peptide in hypertension.
Hypertension. 1994;23(pt 2):1054-1058.
-
Butlen D, Vadrot S, Roseau S, Morel F. Insulin
receptors along the rat nephron: [125I] insulin binding in
microdissected glomeruli and tubules. Pflugers Arch. 1988;412:604-612. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rocchini AP, Katch V, Kveselis D, Moorehead C, Martin
M, Lampman R, Gregory M. Insulin and renal sodium retention in
obese adolescents. Hypertension. 1989;14:367-374. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Finch D, Davis G, Bower K, Kirchner K. Effect of
insulin on renal sodium handling in hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1990;15:514-519. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Koomans HA, Boer WH, Dorhont Mees EJ. Evaluation
of lithium clearance as a marker of proximal tubule sodium
handling. Kidney Int. 1989;36:2-12. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van Hooft IMS, Grobbee DE, Derkx FHM, De Leeuw PW,
Schalekamp MADH, Hofman A. Renal hemodynamics
and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone
system in normotensive subjects with hypertensive and normotensive
parents. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1305-1311. [Abstract]
-
Romero JC, Lahera V, Ruilope L. Role of nitric
oxide on the intrarenal regulation of nephron function and its
relevance to hypertension. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds.
Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. 2nd
ed. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1995:1385-1404.
-
Winternitz SR, Katholi RE, Oparil S. Role of the
renal sympathetic nerves in the development and maintenance of
hypertension in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
J Clin Invest. 1980;66:971-978.
-
Hall JE, Guyton AC, Smith MJ, Coleman TG. Blood
pressure and renal function during chronic changes in sodium intake:
role of angiotensin. Am J Physiol. 1980;239:F271-F280.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. El-Gharbawy, J. M. Kotchen, C. E. Grim, M. Kaldunski, R. G. Hoffmann, Z. Pausova, D. Gaudet, F. Gossard, P. Hamet, and T. A. Kotchen
Predictors of Target Organ Damage in Hypertensive Blacks and Whites
Hypertension,
October 1, 2001;
38(4):
761 - 766.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|