(Hypertension. 1995;26:1129-1133.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Physical Education School (N.S.G., A.S.V.-S., C.E.N.), and the Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine (C.E.N., E.M.K.), University of São Paulo (Brazil).
Correspondence to Eduardo Moacyr Krieger, MD, PhD, Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Av Dr Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 44, São Paulo, Brazil, CEP O5403-000.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: adrenergic ß-antagonists blood pressure bradycardia exercise heart rate rats, inbred SHR
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been observed that the initial stage of hypertension is associated with activation of sympathetic activity, cardiac output, and heart rate.10 11 Because exercise training causes a diminishment of sympathetic nerve activity in both heart and peripheral tissue in normotensive rats7 9 and humans,8 we decided to study the chronic effect of exercise on sympathetic nerve activity that controls heart rate in SHR.
Previous studies have demonstrated that varying intensities of exercise training have different effects on arterial blood pressure in SHR12 and humans,13 suggesting that the neurovegetative changes produced by exercise training in spontaneous hypertension could be influenced by the intensity of training. Therefore, the purpose of the present investigation was to study the effect of low and high intensities of exercise training on sympathetic and vagal controls of heart rate at rest and during dynamic exercise of progressive intensity in SHR.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exercise training was performed on a motor treadmill for 60 minutes, 5
days per week for 18 weeks, at 55% of
o2max for the
LT rats and 85% of
o2max for the HT rats. The
sedentary rats were handled every day; 3 days per week they were also
submitted to short 5-minute periods of exercise on the motor treadmill
at 0.5 mph to become accustomed to the experimental procedures.
o2max was measured by means of expired gas
analysis during a progressive exercise test at 5-m/min
increments every 4 minutes. Samples of expired gases were collected in
a 20-mL syringe during the last 30 seconds of every work load. Oxygen
and carbon dioxide concentrations were analyzed with the
Scholander microtechnique (Godart-Statham).
After the last training session, with rats under ether anesthesia, three stainless steel electrodes (5 cm long and 0.55 mm in diameter) were implanted subcutaneously and attached to the right and the left axillary areas and dorsum as previously described in detail.4 The electrodes were used to monitor electrocardiographic results in a multichannel record (model 7754A, Hewlett-Packard) as measures of heart rate. The vagal and sympathetic activities were analyzed by intraperitoneal injections of methylatropine (3 mg/kg, Sigma Chemical Co) and propranolol (4 mg/kg, Sigma) 24 hours after the electrodes had been implanted.4 14 On the first day of study, heart rate was recorded at rest and during three different exercise intensities: 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph for 4 minutes at each level. Heart rate values obtained during the last 60 seconds immediately before the beginning of the exercise and during the last 15 seconds of each exercise level were used for comparisons. On the second day of study, methylatropine was injected, and 15 minutes later the rats underwent the same protocol as on the first day. At the end of the exercise, propranolol was injected, and the exercise was repeated 15 minutes later. The last session of exercise performed under methylatropine and propranolol was used to study the behavior of intrinsic heart rate. On the third day of study, propranolol was injected 15 minutes before the exercise protocol was started. Methylatropine was injected at the end of exercise, and 15 minutes later the exercise protocol was repeated to study for the second time the behavior of intrinsic heart rate at rest and during a progressive dynamic exercise. The vagal effect was evaluated as the difference between the control heart rate and the maximum heart rate after methylatropine injection. The sympathetic effect was evaluated as the difference between the control heart rate and minimum heart rate after propranolol injection. The vagal tonus was analyzed as the difference between the intrinsic heart rate and the heart rate after propranolol injection. The sympathetic tonus was analyzed as the difference between the maximum heart rate after methylatropine injection and the intrinsic heart rate. For the purpose of the study, intrinsic heart rate was expressed as the mean value of the two measurements performed on the second and third days of the experiment.
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Data from all three groups during the experimental conditions (rest and exercise) were pooled and subjected to a multivariate analysis of repeated measures (profile analysis), with complete observations at group and exercise levels.15 Because the vagal effect did not have the same profile among groups, the multivariate analysis was followed by contrasts between means at rest and at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
o2max than the sedentary group after exercise
training (92±9 and 94±7 versus 72±8 mL
O2 · kg-1 ·min-1,
respectively), whereas the values of all groups were similar before
training (96±8, 102±7, and 99±8 mL
O2·kg-1·min-1,
respectively). The heart rate data of sedentary, HT, and LT groups at rest and during exercise performed at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph are presented in Table 1. Heart rate increased progressively from rest to 1.0-mph exercise in all groups (P<.05), but it was attenuated by exercise training (Fig 1). Heart rates of both LT and HT groups were significantly lower than those of the sedentary group during all experimental conditions (rest and exercise). Heart rate values were still significantly lower in the LT group than in the HT group.
|
|
The vagal effect data, analyzed as the difference between the maximal heart rate after methylatropine administration and the control heart rate, are presented in Table 1. The vagal effect decreased significantly from rest to 1.0-mph exercise in all groups (P<.05). There was no significant difference among groups at rest. During exercise at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph, however, both LT and HT rats had a significantly lower vagal effect than sedentary rats, but no significant difference was found between exercised groups (Table 1, Fig 2). These results indicate that the vagal withdrawal during progressive exercise was significantly reduced after low- and high-intensity exercise training.
|
The sympathetic effect data, analyzed as the difference between the control heart rate and the minimal heart rate after administration of propranolol, are presented in Table 1. The sympathetic effect increased significantly from rest to 1.0-mph exercise in all groups (P<.05). LT rats had a significantly lower sympathetic effect than both sedentary rats and HT rats during all experimental conditions (rest and exercise), but no significant difference was observed between sedentary rats and HT rats (Table 1, Fig 2). These data indicate that only low-intensity exercise training attenuated the increase of sympathetic activity during progressive exercise.
The intrinsic heart rate values, obtained after blockade of methylatropine and propranolol, increased significantly (P<.05) during exercise in all groups (Table 2). No significant difference between sedentary rats and LT rats was observed during all experimental conditions (rest and exercise), but the values were significantly higher in sedentary rats compared with HT rats.
|
The vagal tonus values, analyzed as the difference between the intrinsic heart rate and minimal heart rate after administration of propranolol, decreased significantly (P<.05) from rest to 1.0-mph exercise in all groups (Table 2). However, no significant difference among groups was observed during all experimental conditions (rest and exercise).
The sympathetic tonus values, analyzed as the difference between the maximal heart rate after methylatropine administration and the intrinsic heart rate, increased significantly (P<.05) from rest to 1.0-mph exercise in all groups (Table 2). LT rats had a significantly lower sympathetic tonus than both sedentary rats and HT rats during all experimental conditions (rest and exercise), whereas no significant difference was observed between HT rats and sedentary rats (Fig 3). Therefore, both sympathetic tonus and sympathetic effect were attenuated in the LT group during dynamic exercise of progressive intensity.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The higher
o2max in the LT and HT rats shows the
effectiveness of the present exercise training.
The present data show that in SHR exercise training significantly decreases heart rate at rest and during exercise. However, in contrast to other observations in normotensive rats4 and normotensive humans,2 resting bradycardia cannot be explained by a decrease in intrinsic heart rate, since no significant difference in intrinsic heart rate was found between LT rats and sedentary rats at rest (Table 2). Indeed, it can be attributed to a decrease in sympathetic drive to the heart in LT rats, since both sympathetic effect and sympathetic tonus were significantly reduced, whereas no significant change was found in vagal effect and vagal tonus. In agreement with other studies in normotensive rats9 and normotensive humans,16 17 the increase in heart rate response during exercise in SHR was mainly due to a progressive withdrawal of vagal activity and a progressive increase of sympathetic activity during exercise. Furthermore, in the present study, vagal effect and tonus decreased significantly when the exercise intensity increased, whereas sympathetic effect and tonus increased significantly. Exercise training attenuated the tachycardiac response during exercise because a lower sympathetic activity is released simultaneously with increased vagal activity. These data agree with our previous observation that in normotensive trained rats9 cardiac acceleration was significantly attenuated at 0.8 and 1.0 mph. Similar results were also found in dogs18 and in men.19 Varying exercise intensity exerted different effects on the cardiac sympathetic functions at rest and during exercise. We found that resting bradycardia and attenuation of tachycardiac response were more intense after low- than after high-intensity exercise training, probably because sympathetic effect and sympathetic tonus were significantly less pronounced in the LT rats.
Regarding the effects of acute and chronic exercise on sympathetic
activity, Cléroux et al5 reported that exercise
performed at 50% of
o2max for 45 minutes caused a
significant decrease in total peripheral resistance at the
recovery period, associated with a significant diminishment of plasma
norepinephrine in hypertensive subjects. Floras et
al6 demonstrated that an acute session of exercise
provoked a significant decrease in neuromuscular sympathetic activity
in hypertensive men. More recently, we demonstrated that exercise
training significantly reduced renal sympathetic nerve activity in
normotensive rats,7 as did Meredith et al20
in humans. Grassi et al8 showed that exercise training
significantly reduced neuromuscular sympathetic activity in humans.
Moreover, DiCarlo and Bishop21 verified that exercise
training significantly decreased the sensitivity of the baroreflex
control of renal sympathetic nerve activity in rabbits during
progressive reduction of arterial blood pressure. However,
the present study provides the first demonstration that low- but
not high-intensity exercise training significantly decreases
sympathetic nerve activity of the heart at rest and during progressive
dynamic exercise in SHR. The sedentary SHR had an 18%, 22%, and 17%
higher sympathetic effect at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph, respectively, than
the normotensive rats we studied previously.9 The SHR
subjected to high-intensity exercise training showed a tendency
toward a normalization of sympathetic activity during exercise, since
they had only a 14%, 10%, and 6% higher sympathetic effect than
sedentary normotensive rats at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph,
respectively.9 The SHR on low-intensity exercise
training showed not only a striking reduction in sympathetic nerve
activity but also a training adaptation very similar to that found in
normotensive trained rats undergoing exercise training at approximately
60% of
o2max.9 The sympathetic effect
at 0.5, 0.8, and 1.0 mph was 84, 88, and 105 beats per minute,
respectively, in SHR and 85, 73, and 96 beats per minute, respectively,
in normotensive rats.9 There is no definitive explanation
of the distinct effect caused by low-intensity and
high-intensity exercise training in SHR. High-intensity
exercise may increase the sympathetic drive so intensively that it
overcomes the benefits of exercise training, at least in SHR. The
mechanisms involved in the attenuation of the sympathetic nerve
activity in trained rats can be either centrally or
peripherally mediated. Shyu and Thorén22
have demonstrated that spontaneous exercise in SHR caused a significant
decrease in arterial blood pressure at the recovery period
and that naloxone injection before exercise prevented this fall in
blood pressure, suggesting a central modulation of ß-endorphin
release by an exercise session. We showed that exercise training
significantly reduced blood pressure responsiveness to increased doses
of phenylephrine.7 Similar results were
observed in response to norepinephrine.8 23
These data suggest that exercise training produces
1-noradrenergic receptor hyposensitivity.
Experimental and clinical studies have proposed that environmental
conditions that cause stressful stimulation in genetically susceptible
subjects could represent an important factor in the development
of hypertension.24 25 In addition, the initial stage of
hypertension has been attributed to a state called hyperkinetic
circulation, which is related to an activation of the sympathetic
system and an increase in cardiac output and heart rate.10
The present results demonstrate that low-intensity exercise
training in SHR decreases heart rate at rest and during a stressful
condition such as exercise, which is due to a significant reduction of
sympathetic nerve activity. Exercise training performed in excess of
75% of
o2max had no effect on resting caudal blood
pressure in rats, whereas exercise training of 40% to 60% of
o2max lowered blood pressure.12 It has
been also observed that low- and moderate-intensity training have
similar 24-hour blood pressure reductions, but each training intensity
may interfere with different pathogenic effects associated with
distinct blood pressure profiles.13 Therefore,
low-intensity exercise training has a potential usefulness, not
only in preventing the development of hypertension but also in the
nonpharmacological treatment of high blood pressure.
We cannot exclude some possible limitations of the present study related to the use of pharmacological blockade with propranolol (ie, the blockade may not be complete, especially during exercise). In addition, the blockade of one side of the autonomic system may cause changes in the other that would mask the relative contribution of the two divisions; also, the order in which the blockade is given can have an effect on the interpretation of sympathetic and parasympathetic effects. The significant increase in intrinsic heart rate from rest to 1.0 mph suggests an incomplete sympathetic blockade. However, the increase in intrinsic heart rate was only 33, 27, and 36 beats per minute in sedentary, HT, and LT groups, respectively. Moreover, the effectiveness of sympathetic blockade can be also evaluated by comparisons with other studies. Ji et al26 demonstrated that 30 mg/kg propranolol administered during intense exercise caused an attenuation of 25% in the exercising heart rate, whereas in the present study the attenuation was 29%, 28%, and 23% in sedentary, HT, and LT groups, respectively.
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that exercise training in SHR causes resting bradycardia and attenuation of tachycardiac response during dynamic exercise of progressive intensity. Moreover, these adaptations are much more pronounced after low-intensity than high-intensity exercise training, which can be attributed to a significant diminishment of the sympathetic nerve activity that controls heart rate. Therefore, the intensity of exercise training in SHR seems to be crucial to the adaptations of the neurovegetative system that controls heart rate at rest and during a stressful condition such as progressive dynamic exercise.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 18, 1995; first decision August 1, 1995; accepted October 16, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Katona PG, Mclean M, Dighton DH, Guz A.
Sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiac control in athletes and
nonathletes at rest. J Appl Physiol. 1982;52:1652-1657.
3.
Lin Y, Horvath SM. Automatic nervous control of
cardiac frequency in the exercise-trained rat.
J Appl Physiol. 1972;33:796-799.
4.
Negrão CE, Moreira ED, Santos MCLM, Farah VMA,
Krieger EM. Vagal function impairment after exercise
training. J Appl Physiol. 1992;72:1749-1753.
5.
Cléroux J, Kouamé N, Nadeau A, Coulombe D,
Lacourciere Y. Aftereffects of exercise on regional and systemic
hemodynamics in hypertension.
Hypertension. 1992;19:183-191.
6.
Floras JS, Sinkey CA, Aylward PE, Seals DR,
Thorén PN, Mark AL. Postexercise hypotension and
sympathoinhibition in borderline hypertensive men.
Hypertension. 1989;14:28-35.
7. Negrão CE, Irigoyen MC, Moreira ED, Brum PC, Freire PM, Krieger EM. Effect of exercise training on RSNA, baroreflex control, and blood pressure responsiveness. Am J Physiol. 1993;265(2, pt 2):R365-R370.
8.
Grassi G, Seravalle G, Calhoun DA, Mancia G.
Physical training and baroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve
activity in humans. Hypertension. 1994;23:294-301.
9. Negrão CE, Moreira ED, Brum PC, Denadai MLDR, Krieger EM. Vagal and sympathetic control of heart rate during exercise by sedentary and exercise-trained rats. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1992;25:1045-1052. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Esler M, Julius S, Randall O, Dequatro V, Zweifler A. High-renin essential hypertension: adrenergic cardiovascular correlates. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1976;51(suppl 3):181S-184S.
11. Lund-Johansen P. Hemodynamics in essential hypertension. Acta Med Scand. 1967;482(suppl 1):1-83.
12.
Tipton CM, Matthes RD, Marcus KD, Rowlett KA, Leininger
RJ. Influences of exercise intensity, age, and medication on
resting systolic blood pressure of SHR populations.
J Appl Physiol.. 1983;55:1305-1310.
13.
Marceau M, Kouamé N, Lacourcière Y,
Cléroux J. Effect of different training intensities on
24-hour blood pressure in hypertensive subjects.
Circulation. 1993;88:2803-2811.
14. Soato GG, Krieger EM. Heart rate after hypertension in rats. Am J Physiol. 1974;22:1389-1393.
15. Morrison DF. Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1967:170-224.
16. Gallo L Jr, Maciel BC, Marin-Neto JA, Martins LEB. Sympathetic and parasympathetic changes in heart rate control during dynamic exercise induced by endurance training in man. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1989;22:631-643. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Robinson BF, Epstein SE, Beise GD, Braunwald E.
Control of heart rate by the autonomic nervous system.
Circ Res. 1966;19:400-411.
18.
Tipton CM, Carey RA, Eastin WC, Erickson HH. A
submaximal test for dogs: evaluation of effects of training,
detraining, and confinement. J Appl
Physiol. 1974;37:271-275.
19. Lewis SF, Nylander E, Gad P, Areskog NH. Non-autonomic component in bradycardia of endurance trained men at rest and during exercise. Acta Physiol Scand. 1980;109:297-305. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Meredith IT, Friberg P, Jenning GL, Dewar EM, Fazio VA,
Lambert GW, Esler MD. Exercise training lowers resting renal but
not cardiac sympathetic activity in humans.
Hypertension. 1991;18:575-582.
21.
DiCarlo SE, Bishop VS. Exercise training
enhances cardiac afferent inhibition of baroreflex function.
Am J Physiol.. 1990;258:H212-H220.
22. Shyu BC, Thorén P. Circulatory events following spontaneous muscle exercise in normotensive and hypertensive rats. Acta Physiol Scand. 1986;128:515-524. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Pavlik G, Hegyi A, Frenkl R. Alpha and beta adrenergic sensitivity in trained and untrained albino rats. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1976;36:65-73.
24.
Falkner BG, Onesti G, Angelakos E, Fernandes H, Langman
C. Cardiovascular response to mental stress in
normal adolescents with hypertensive parents:
hemodynamics and mental stress in adolescents.
Hypertension. 1979;1:23-30.
25. Manuck SB, Giordani B, MacQuaid KJ, Garrity SJ. Behaviorally-induced cardiovascular reactivity among sons of reported hypertensive and normotensive parents. J Psychosom Res. 1981;25:261-269. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ji LL, Lennon DLF, Kochan RG, Nagle FJ, Lardy HA. Enzymatic adaptation to physical exercise under ß-blockade in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1986;78:771-778.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. P. L. Rolim, A. Medeiros, K. T. Rosa, K. C. Mattos, M. C. Irigoyen, E. M. Krieger, J. E. Krieger, C. E. Negrao, and P. C. Brum Exercise training improves the net balance of cardiac Ca2+ handling protein expression in heart failure Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2007; 29(3): 246 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rondon, M. S. Brasileiro-Santos, E. D. Moreira, M. U. P. B. Rondon, K. C. Mattos, M. A. Coelho, G. J. J. Silva, P. C. Brum, P. Fiorino, M. C. Irigoyen, et al. Exercise training improves aortic depressor nerve sensitivity in rats with ischemia-induced heart failure Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2801 - H2806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Lujan, S. L. Britton, L. G. Koch, and S. E. DiCarlo Reduced susceptibility to ventricular tachyarrhythmias in rats selectively bred for high aerobic capacity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2933 - H2941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Melo, E. Martinho Jr, and L. C. Michelini Training-Induced, Pressure-Lowering Effect in SHR: Wide Effects on Circulatory Profile of Exercised and Nonexercised Muscles Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 851 - 857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. STORY, S. E. DICARLO, D. W. RODENBAUGH, D. E. DLUZEN, J. KUCERA, M. B. MARON, and J. M. WALRO Inactivation of one copy of the mouse neurotrophin-3 gene induces cardiac sympathetic deficits Physiol Genomics, April 27, 2000; 2(3): 129 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. A. L. d'Avila, G. Gadonski, J. Fang, P. Dall'Ago, V. L. Albuquerque, L. R. d. A. Peixoto, T. G. Fernandes, and M. C. Irigoyen Exercise Reverses Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Trained L-NAME-Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 768 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Chandler and S. E. Dicarlo Acute exercise and gender alter cardiac autonomic tonus differently in hypertensive and normotensive rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 1998; 274(2): R510 - R516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Veras-Silva, K. C. Mattos, N. S. Gava, P. C. Brum, C. E. Negrao, and E. M. Krieger Low-intensity exercise training decreases cardiac output and hypertension in spontaneously hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2627 - H2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. J. Silva, P. C. Brum, C. E. Negrao, and E. M. Krieger Acute and Chronic Effects of Exercise on Baroreflexes in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, September 1, 1997; 30(3): 714 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |