(Hypertension. 1996;27:276-280.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From The Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research, Department of Internal Medicine (S.G., P.L.) and Institute of Clinical Neurosciences (Department of Neurophysiology) (Y.B.S., B.G.W., M.E.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
Correspondence to Soffia Gudbjörnsdóttir, The Lundberg Laboratory for Diabetes Research, Department of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-41345 Göteborg, Sweden.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: microneurography sympathetic nerve activity hypertension insulin obesity
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early studies showed no significant difference in resting MSA between patients with primary hypertension and normotensive control subjects.10 11 In contrast, Yamada and coworkers12 found an increased MSA in a large group of hypertensive patients. Some subsequent studies have demonstrated increased MSA in young, mildly hypertensive subjects,13 14 whereas others have found no significant difference compared with control subjects.15 16 One reason for the varying results may be that hypertension covaries with other factors (such as obesity, altered glucose metabolism, and sleep disturbances), which per se may affect MSA.17 Thus, Scherrer et al8 recently found positive correlations between MSA, BMI, and plasma insulin and concluded that BMI and plasma insulin are independent determinants of MSA. These factors were not controlled in the majority of previous reports on the relationship between levels of MSA and BP. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to quantitate resting levels of MSA and fasting plasma insulin in middle-aged, obese men with established hypertension and in BMI- and age-matched control subjects to further investigate the relationship between resting MSA and BP level.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study Design
Left arm supine BP was measured weekly
throughout the study
period with a sphygmomanometer after 10 minutes of rest. DBP was
defined as Korotkoff phase V. Three weeks after antihypertensive
medication was discontinued, resting MSA was recorded and blood
samples for analysis of plasma levels of insulin and glucose
were taken, the experimental procedures starting at 8 AM
after an overnight fast. The control subjects underwent the same
protocol.
Microneurography
Multiunit efferent postganglionic
sympathetic activity was
recorded with a tungsten microelectrode with a tip diameter of a
few microns inserted in a muscle fascicle of the peroneal nerve at the
fibular head. A reference electrode was inserted subcutaneously 1 to 2
cm away from the recording electrode. When a muscle nerve
fascicle had been identified, small electrode adjustments were made
until a site was found in which sympathetic impulses with adequate
signal-to-noise ratio could be recorded. Criteria for MSA
and details regarding the recording technique have been
described previously.18 The original nerve signal was fed
through a band-pass filter with a bandwidth of 700 to 2000 Hz. A
mean voltage neurogram was obtained by passage of the filtered
neurogram through a resistance-capacitance integrating network with
a time constant of 0.1 second. The integrated neurogram was displayed
on an ink-jet recorder (Mingograph 800, Siemens-Elema Ltd) at a
paper speed of 5 mm/s, together with an
electrocardiogram derived with standard chest leads.
Respiratory movements were monitored by a strain gauge attached to a
rubber strap around the chest. All registered signals were stored on a
VHS tape recorder (Racal Recorders Ltd). Sympathetic neural
bursts were identified by inspection of the mean voltage neurogram. The
number of sympathetic bursts was counted during the last 5 minutes of a
15- to 20-minute rest period. MSA is expressed as burst frequency
(bursts per minute) and burst incidence (bursts per 100 heart
beats).
Chemical Analyses
Blood glucose levels were determined with a
glucose 6-phosphate
dehydrogenase method (Beckman Instruments) (coefficient of variation,
3%). Plasma insulin was assayed with a radioimmunoassay (Pharmacia)
(coefficient of variation, 6%).
Data Analysis
All data are presented as mean±SEM,
except the values
in Table 1
, which are mean±SD. Two-tailed
Student's t
test for unpaired data was used to compare resting MSA levels in
hypertensive and normotensive subjects. The relationships between MSA,
BMI, plasma insulin levels, and BP were assessed with multiple
regression analysis; a value of P<.05 was
considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
BMI correlated with plasma insulin levels in the entire study group
(r=.65, P<.001) and normotensive subjects
(r=.84, P<.001), whereas the relationship did
not reach significance in the hypertensive group (r=.43,
P=.07) (Table 2
). BMI correlated with SBP (data
not shown)
and DBP in the entire study group and with SBP in the normotensive
subjects (data not shown).
Plasma insulin correlated with SBP (r=.45,
P<.05) (data not shown) and DBP (r=.39,
P<.05) (Table 2
) in the entire study group and with
SBP in
the normotensive group (r=.53, P<.05) (data not
shown).
Multiple linear regression analysis with MSA as the dependent variable showed that BMI, plasma insulin, age, and DBP determined 5% and 6% of the variability of MSA expressed as burst incidence and burst frequency, respectively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MSA and BP Level
Previous studies on the relationship between
resting levels of MSA
and BP have yielded conflicting results (see above). Since there are
large interindividual differences in resting MSA levels in healthy
subjects,19 random differences related to too small
subject groups may contribute to the varying results.20
However, given the recent demonstration of a significant positive
correlation between BMI/percent body fat and resting MSA,8
differences in body weight may also be a confounding factor. For
example, in one study of established hypertensive patients
with12 and two studies of patients
without10 11 evidence of increased MSA, body weight
was
not controlled for. Furthermore, in young borderline hypertensive
subjects, both unaltered15 and augmented13
MSA have been reported, but in the latter study the hypertensive
subjects were significantly heavier than the normotensive control
subjects. In addition, the MSA increase in hypertensive subjects could
not be confirmed in a later study from the same
laboratory.16 A recent study of eight borderline
hypertensive patients and eight weight- and age-matched
normotensive control subjects showed a higher average MSA in the
hypertensive group, but the difference was primarily due to two
patients with markedly higher MSA levels than the rest of the study
group.14 Another reason for variability among studies may
be sex differences. Recently, women were found to have lower resting
MSA levels than men21 ; therefore, differences in the
proportions of men and women may also confound comparisons among
groups. In the present study of 34 men, hypertensive and
normotensive subjects matched for BMI and age did not differ in resting
MSA. This finding argues against established hypertension being
associated with augmented MSA.
MSA and Obesity
Body weight reduction in obese borderline
hypertensive women has
been shown to decrease MSA and DBP,9 which is compatible
with a relationship between obesity and MSA. Recent studies have found
a positive correlation between obesity and resting
MSA.22 23 Spraul et al22 found this
correlation in whites but not in age- and weight-matched Pima
Indians, suggesting that a relationship between obesity and MSA may
depend on genetic factors. As mentioned above, Scherrer and
coworkers8 recently demonstrated a correlation between
MSA, BMI, and body fat in a group of healthy men and women covering a
broad spectrum of percent body fat and suggested body fat to be a major
determinant of resting MSA in healthy subjects. In contrast, we found
only a weak correlation between MSA and BMI in the hypertensive group
and no correlation in the normotensive one. The reason for this
discrepancy is unclear, but the fact that all our subjects were male
and had a less wide span of both BMI and age may contribute. In fact,
if subjects in the study group of Scherrer et al who fall within our
BMI range (24 to 43 kg/m2) are considered, the correlation
between BMI and MSA appears to be weak also in their study. Together
with our present findings, this argues against the view that BMI is
a major determinant of MSA. Regarding the fat distribution, it is worth
noting that the two study groups showed no difference in waist-hip
ratios and that there was no correlation between MSA and waist-hip
ratios.
MSA and Plasma Insulin
An acute increase in plasma insulin
level is known to augment MSA
in normotensive4 5 and borderline
hypertensive24 subjects. In obese normotensive subjects,
Vollenweider et al23 found impaired muscle sympathetic
responses to physiological
hyperinsulinemia, whereas a normal increase in MSA
has been reported in obese hypertensive subjects.25 In the
latter patient category, renal and total body
norepinephrine spillovers remained unaffected during
insulin clamp.25
A correlation between fasting
insulin level and MSA was
recently demonstrated,8 indicating a relationship also
between habitual insulin levels and MSA. In our study, no such
correlation was found between MSA expressed as bursts per minute and
fasting plasma insulin levels. MSA burst incidence (bursts per 100
heart beats) correlated weakly with plasma insulin in the hypertensive
group but not in the normotensive or entire study group (Fig
2
).
Insulin has been assumed to stimulate sympathetic activity at a central
level,26 and the present finding may indicate a
difference in central sympathetic response to insulin between the two
groups. However, the relationship between MSA and insulin was weak also
in hypertensive subjects, casting doubt on the functional importance of
this relationship in established hypertension.
Obesity, Plasma Insulin, and Hypertension
The majority of
newly diagnosed hypertensive individuals are
obese.27 Obesity, particularly of the abdominal type, is
associated not only with hypertension but also with insulin resistance
and secondary hyperinsulinemia,28
which has been considered important for the development of high BP (see
above). Arguing against this notion, several studies have demonstrated
that the fasting insulin levels are elevated to a similar degree in
obese normotensive and obese hypertensive
individuals.3 29 30 In the present study,
fasting
insulin levels correlated weakly with DBP in the entire study group but
did not differ significantly between normotensive and hypertensive
subjects. Thus, fasting insulin level does not appear to be the factor
mediating a coupling between obesity and hypertension. On the other
hand, insulin levels attained during an oral glucose tolerance test are
generally higher in obese hypertensive than obese normotensive
subjects,31 leaving the possibility that stimulated
insulin levels or the insulin resistance as such may play a role.
However, fasting insulin levels correlate strongly with standard
measurements of insulin resistance obtained during
euglycemic hyperinsulinemic
clamp32 (r=.7 in our laboratory, unpublished
observations, 1995). Given the lack of difference in MSA in the
present study, one possibility is that the difference between
hypertensive and normotensive subjects lies in different modulating
actions of insulin/insulin resistance on neuroeffector transfer at the
vascular level.33 In this context, it is of interest that
insulin resistance in obese subjects has recently been shown to be
associated with augmented norepinephrine sensitivity and
decreased norepinephrine clearance,34 which
potentially could contribute to hypertension.
In conclusion, the present data confirm that BMI and plasma insulin levels are closely related and both of these factors correlate weakly with BP. On the other hand, the relationship between MSA and each of these factors remains unclear, and in our present study group BMI, plasma insulin, DBP, and age only determined 5% of the variability in MSA when analyzed with multiple linear regression. Furthermore, MSA did not differ significantly between normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Taken together, these findings cast doubt on the notion that altered MSA is an underlying mechanism for hypertension in obese, middle-aged men.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 13, 1995; first decision August 10, 1995; accepted October 23, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic pathway in humans.
Hypertension. 1994;24:429-438. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. V. Agapitov, M. L. d. G. Correia, C. A. Sinkey, and W. G. Haynes Dissociation Between Sympathetic Nerve Traffic and Sympathetically Mediated Vascular Tone in Normotensive Human Obesity Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 687 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Joyner, N. Charkoudian, and B. G. Wallin A sympathetic view of the sympathetic nervous system and human blood pressure regulation Exp Physiol, June 1, 2008; 93(6): 715 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Gentile, J. S. Orr, B. M. Davy, and K. P. Davy Modest weight gain is associated with sympathetic neural activation in nonobese humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): R1834 - R1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Huggett, J. Burns, A. F. Mackintosh, and D. A.S.G. Mary Sympathetic Neural Activation in Nondiabetic Metabolic Syndrome and Its Further Augmentation by Hypertension Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 847 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Greenwood, E. M. Scott, J. B. Stoker, and D. A. S. G. Mary Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: relation to peripheral sympathetic drive J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1711 - 1717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. I. Abate, Y. H. Mansour, M. Tuncel, D. Arbique, B. Chavoshan, A. Kizilbash, T. Howell-Stampley, W. Vongpatanasin, and R. G. Victor Overweight and Sympathetic Overactivity in Black Americans Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 379 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Weyer, R. E. Pratley, S. Snitker, M. Spraul, E. Ravussin, and P. A. Tataranni Ethnic Differences in Insulinemia and Sympathetic Tone as Links Between Obesity and Blood Pressure Hypertension, October 1, 2000; 36(4): 531 - 537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, R. Dell'Oro, C. Turri, G. B. Bolla, and G. Mancia Adrenergic and Reflex Abnormalities in Obesity-Related Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2000; 36(4): 538 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Greenwood, J. B. Stoker, and D. A. S. G. Mary Single-Unit Sympathetic Discharge : Quantitative Assessment in Human Hypertensive Disease Circulation, September 21, 1999; 100(12): 1305 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Fletcher, G. Bao, and R. Li Renin Activity and Blood Pressure in Response to Chronic Episodic Hypoxia Hypertension, August 1, 1999; 34(2): 309 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Supiano, R. V. Hogikyan, M. A. Sidani, A. T. Galecki, and J. L. Krueger Sympathetic nervous system activity and alpha -adrenergic responsiveness in older hypertensive humans Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 1999; 276(3): E519 - E528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. B. Sverrisdóttir, M. Elam, H. Herlitz, B.-A. Bengtsson, and G. Johannsson Intense Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Adults with Hypopituitarism and Untreated Growth Hormone Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1998; 83(6): 1881 - 1885. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |