Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1996;27:449-455

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gavras, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gavras, H.

(Hypertension. 1996;27:449-455.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Localization of {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in Brain

Agostinho Tavares; Diane E. Handy; Natalia N. Bogdanova; Douglas L. Rosene; Haralambos Gavras

From the Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Section of the Department of Medicine and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology (D.L.R.), Boston (Mass) University School of Medicine.

Correspondence to Haralambos Gavras, MD, Hypertension and Atherosclerosis Section, Boston University School of Medicine, 80 E Concord St, Boston, MA 02118.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Recent studies have shown that all three subtypes of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor ({alpha}2-AR) are found in brain. The purpose of this study was to map the subtype localization of the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs in brain structures. RNase protection shows that both the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs are detectable in cortex, cerebellum, pons-medulla, and hypothalamus. We tested probes derived from the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR cDNAs on cell lines that express each of the {alpha}2-AR subtypes to establish the subtype specificity of these probes for in situ hybridization. Then we used the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR probes for in situ hybridization on sagittal and coronal sections of rat brain. Both {alpha}2A and {alpha}2B mRNA were detected throughout the brain. Overall, there appears to be a greater expression of message for {alpha}2A- than {alpha}2B-AR in most brain areas, with the exception of the thalamus. Developing these probes for in situ hybridization is an important step for further studies on the exact role of the {alpha}2-AR subtypes in neurons that modulate cardiovascular function.


Key Words: receptors, adrenergic, alpha • brain


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors ({alpha}2-ARs) are believed to have an important role in the central regulation of autonomic cardiovascular function.1 The lower brain stem structures contain a high concentration of {alpha}2-ARs2 and are responsible for maintaining vasomotor sympathetic tone.3 Moreover, the {alpha}2-ARs within the brain stem are the target of the central hypotensive actions of clonidine.4

The {alpha}2-ARs are a heterogeneous group of receptors that mediate their effects through the Gi class of G proteins and bind to the naturally occurring ligands epinephrine and norepinephrine. As in other G protein–coupled receptors, {alpha}2-AR subtypes have been identified that differ in their structure, pharmacological profile, and tissue distribution.5 6 7 8 9 Pharmacological and molecular studies of {alpha}2-ARs have suggested at least three distinct genes in both human and rat that code for three distinct subtypes, designated {alpha}2A, {alpha}2B, and {alpha}2C.5 Recent studies show that all three subtypes are found in brain and kidney.6 7 10

Localization of {alpha}2-ARs in the rat brain has been accomplished with radiolabeled ligands,11 and localization of {alpha}2-AR transcripts has been done with RNAse protection assays or Northern blots.7 10 However, these data cannot provide unequivocal information on the cellular distribution of the various {alpha}2-AR subtypes because the radioligands have broad specificities for the {alpha}2 class of receptors. Subtype-specific probes have been used in protection analysis or Northern blots, but these methods rely on the isolation of RNA from larger dissected tissue sections. Recent reports have made progress in determining the localization of these receptors in rat brain cells by using immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization12 13 14 15 16 17 ; however, there are inconsistencies among the several studies that used in situ hybridization.12 13 14 15 16 17

To address these problems, we developed a unique set of riboprobes, and in this article we describe the localization of {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs in the normotensive rat brain using in situ hybridization with subtype-specific RNA probes.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Subtype-Specific Probes
We subcloned regions of the rat {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR genomic DNA and cDNA, respectively, into an SP6 promoter containing vector, psP65 (Promega), to allow the synthesis of antisense RNA probes that are specific for transcripts from either the {alpha}2A- or {alpha}2B-AR genes. To detect the {alpha}2A mRNA, we subcloned a 600-bp SstI/XbaI fragment that encompasses part of the 5' untranslated region of rat {alpha}2A transcript into psP65 at the Sst I/Xba I sites. A 269-bp Pst I fragment of RNG{alpha}2 cDNA was cloned into the Pst I site of psP65 to create a probe specific for the transcripts that encode the {alpha}2B-AR. RNG{alpha}2 cDNA18 was a kind gift of Dr Kevin R. Lynch, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Va.

Tissue Preparation and In Situ Hybridization
Male Wistar rats (250 to 300 g) under anesthesia (sodium pentobarbital, 50 mg/kg IP) were perfused with cold (4°C) phosphate-buffered saline for 3 to 5 minutes and decapitated. The brain was rapidly removed and frozen in isopentane at -70°C. Serial coronal cryostat sections (15 µm) of this material were thaw-mounted onto silanized slides, rapidly dried, and stored at -20°C until used (3 to 12 weeks). In situ hybridization experiments were performed as previously described.19 Briefly, unfixed, adjacent tissue sections were thawed rapidly, air dried, and incubated in 35 000 cpm/µL of one of the 35S-labeled RNA probes diluted in a hybridization solution consisting of 50% deionized formamide, 0.3 mol/L NaCl, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 5 mmol/L EDTA, 10 mmol/L NaH2PO4·H2O (pH 8.0), 10% dextran sulfate, 1x Denhardt's, and 0.5 mg/mL total yeast RNA. Sections were incubated in humidified boxes at 52°C for 17 hours. Sections were washed extensively in 0.75 mol/L NaCl, 0.075 mol/L sodium citrate, and 10 mmol/L dithiothreitol for 30 minutes at 50°C and 0.30 mol/L NaCl, 0.030 mol/L sodium citrate, 50% formamide, and 0.1 mol/L dithiothreitol for 20 minutes at 65°C before digestion with 0.02 mg/mL RNase A for 60 minutes at 37°C. After dehydration in a series of ethanols from 30% to 100%, the slides were air-dried, dipped in Kodak NTB2 autoradiography emulsion, and exposed for 6-7 days in a light-free black plastic box at 4°C. Finally, these slides were developed in Kodak D19 for 4 minutes at 14°C and fixed in Kodak Rapid Fix A (solution A) for 3 minutes. Sections were rinsed in distilled water, stained through the emulsion with 0.05% thionin, and dehydrated in graded ethanols, and glass coverslips were affixed with Cytoseal 60 mounting medium. All the sections were examined under bright- and dark-field illumination with a microscope. Photomicrographs were taken with Polaroid Type 55 or Kodak Contrast Process Ortho 4x5 films. The identification and nomenclature of rat brain structures were based on the atlas of Paxinos and Watson.20

In addition to this microscopic analysis, we also used a computerized video densitometry system (Inquiry, Loats Associates) to perform an overall analysis of the labeling obtained with these two methods. In this case, one brain was sagittally sectioned, and adjacent sections were processed with both sense and antisense probes for both the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs. These sections were then exposed on a single piece of Hyperfilm (Amersham) for 5 days, after which the film was developed in D19 and digitized on the Inquiry densitometry system. Since the overall labeling of the {alpha}2A-AR was much greater than for the {alpha}2B-AR, the background level of labeling of the pseudocolor map was adjusted so that the range of densities for the two probes was normalized. In this way, areas that differed from the global mean could be visually revealed and used to confirm the differential distribution and labeling of these two probes as well as to guide further analysis.

Cell Lines
In situ hybridization of cultured cell lines was performed after cells were grown on chamber slides. These cells were not stained. Permanently transfected CHO cells that express the rat {alpha}2A-AR (CHO-A), {alpha}2B-AR (CHO-B), and {alpha}2C-AR (CHO-C)7 were maintained in the alpha modification of minimum essential medium without ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. For CHO-A and CHO-C cells, we added 0.005 and 0.02 µmol/L methotrexate to the media, respectively. Untransfected CHO cells (dhfr-) (CHO-d) were grown in alpha minimum essential medium with ribonucleosides and deoxyribonucleosides supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. RINm5F cells, a rat insulin–producing cell line that naturally expresses the {alpha}2A-AR, were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.21 All media were from GIBCO/BRL.

RNase Protection Assay
RNA from Wistar rat brains was isolated through a CsCl gradient as described.22 RNase protection was performed as described.23 Briefly, antisense probes were linearized before RNA synthesis, and antisense RNA was synthesized in the presence of [{alpha}-32P]CTP (Amersham) with SP6 polymerase. RNA duplexes were formed between the radiolabeled probe and RNA samples by overnight hybridization at 45°C in 80% formamide, 0.4 mol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, and 40 mmol/L piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) (pH 6.7). Single-stranded RNA was digested by a mixture of RNase A and T1 at 37°C for 1 hour. Protected bands were visualized on a denaturing 6 mol/L urea, 6% polyacrylamide gel. Labeled pBR322 HinfI fragments were used as size markers.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In Situ Hybridization in Transfected CHO and RINm5F Cells
To verify the specificity and sensitivity of our probes, we performed in situ hybridization on permanently transfected CHO cells expressing {alpha}2A-, {alpha}2B-, and {alpha}2C-ARs and RINm5F cells. Fig 1Down shows the common structure of {alpha}2-AR and relative positions of rat {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR subtype probes.



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Common structure of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor ({alpha}2-AR) and relative positions of rat {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR subtype probes. Boxed area shows common structural organization of the {alpha}2-AR. N indicates extracellular N-terminus; T1 through T7, transmembrane regions 1 through 7; C1 through C3, intracellular (cytoplasmic) loops 1 through 3; E1 through E3, extracellular loops 1 through 3; and C, intracellular C-terminus. Dashed box area shows the 5' untranslated (UT) region. Lines represent the location of probes used in in situ hybridization.

The {alpha}2B antisense probe hybridizes strongly with the transcripts in CHO-B cells (Fig 2ADown) but does not hybridize to transcripts in the CHO-A (Fig 2CDown), CHO-C (Fig 2DDown), or nontransfected CHO-d cells (Fig 2EDown), showing a high specificity of this probe for the rat {alpha}2B mRNA. The {alpha}2A antisense probe strongly hybridizes to all the RINm5F cells (Fig 3ADown). Furthermore, the {alpha}2A probe did not react positively against the CHO-B, CHO-C, or nontransfected CHO-d cells (data not shown). Figs 2BDown and 3BDown also show that {alpha}2B and {alpha}2A sense probes, respectively, produce very little background labeling.



View larger version (169K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Dark-field photomicrographs of in situ hybridization of permanently transfected CHO cells with 35S-labeled {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor antisense and sense probes. Arrows indicate specific hybridization. A, CHO-B and {alpha}2B antisense probe; B, CHO-B and {alpha}2B sense probe; C, CHO-A and {alpha}2B antisense probe; D, CHO-C and {alpha}2B antisense probe; and E, CHO-d and {alpha}2B antisense probe. Bar=100 µm and applies to all panels.



View larger version (116K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Phase-contrast images of in situ hybridization of 35S-labeled {alpha}2A-adrenergic receptor antisense (A) and sense (B) probes to RINm5F cells.

RNase Protection
Dissection of brain into hypothalamus, pons-medulla, cerebellum, and cortex shows that the {alpha}2A-AR transcripts are most concentrated in hypothalamus and pons-medulla, followed by cortex, and are much lower in cerebellum (Fig 4Down). The {alpha}2B-AR probe shows a different distribution pattern, with the strongest signal in hypothalamus, weaker bands in cerebellum and cortex, and a faint but visible band in medulla.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RNase protection of RNA from brain subregions with {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtype–specific probes. Large arrowheads indicate specific protected bands A ({alpha}2A) and B ({alpha}2B). Small arrowheads indicate full length probe. Lane 1, hypothalamus; lane 2, pons-medulla; lane 3, cerebellum; and lane 4, cortex.

In Situ Hybridization in Rat Brain
To begin the analysis of {alpha}2-AR subtypes in brain, we studied the distribution of {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR mRNAs throughout the brain. Specificity of hybridization was indicated by comparison between the low, generally uniform levels of background labeling resulting from hybridization with each labeled sense-strand RNA probe and the strikingly different labeling pattern, the clustering of silver grains over neurons characteristic of specific hybridization between RNA transcripts and the antisense RNA probe. For example, Fig 5Down shows a typical comparison of the labeling patterns of sense and antisense probes. Clusters of silver grains are present over neurons in the cerebellum when either the {alpha}2A or {alpha}2B antisense probe is used (Fig 5ADown and 5BDown, respectively), whereas few silver grains are apparent when either the {alpha}2A or {alpha}2B sense probe is used (Fig 5CDown and 5DDown, respectively). Comparison of sense and antisense signals showed message for both the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs to be expressed throughout the rat brain. The TableDown shows the relative distribution of these receptor subtypes in various brain structures. Fig 6Down represents a digitized scan of autoradiographic images showing the localization of {alpha}2A and {alpha}2B mRNAs throughout the brain. Overall, there appeared to be a greater expression of {alpha}2A- than {alpha}2B-AR in the brain, with the exception of some thalamic structures.



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bright-field photomicrographs of cerebellum of adjacent sections processed with antisense (A and B) and sense (C and D) probes to the message for {alpha}2A-adrenergic receptor (A and C) and {alpha}2B-adrenergic receptor (B and D) subtypes. Large arrows in A and C mark approximate boundaries, from top to bottom, between the molecular (ml) and granule cell (gc) layers of the cerebellum. Below the granule cell layer is the underlying white matter where neither the sense nor antisense probe demonstrates any significant labeling. In contrast, there is significant labeling (black dots) over cells in both granule cell and molecular layers with the antisense probe to the {alpha}2A message in A and the antisense probe to the {alpha}2B message in B. A few specific examples are indicated by small arrows. Because of the packing density of the granule cells, the association of label with individual cells is obscured, but the relative absence of label over the granule cells with the respective sense probes in C and D establishes the specificity of this cerebellar labeling. Bar=20 µm and applies to all panels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of mRNAs for Adrenergic Receptors in Central Nervous System of Rat



View larger version (0K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Digitized scans of autoradiographic images showing the localization of {alpha}2A (A) and {alpha}2B (B) mRNAs throughout the brain. Images were digitized on the Inquiry computerized densitometry system (Loats Associates). The pseudocolor scale was then adjusted to span the same range of colors in both, which serves to normalize the distribution of densities, allowing similar colors to be compared in two images with different gray scale ranges for identification of the relative (not absolute) densities of the two probes. In these images, brighter colors (yellow) indicate higher densities. This representation of the data facilitates comparison of the differences in relative distribution of the {alpha}2A-adrenergic receptor message shown in A and the {alpha}2B-adrenergic receptor message shown in B. The arrows in both panels identify areas of particular difference. For example, the left arrow indicates that the cerebral cortex has a higher density of {alpha}2A message in superficial layers compared with deep layers (A), a distribution not seen for {alpha}2B (B). In contrast, the right arrows indicate that the granule cell layers of the cerebellum have a very high density of {alpha}2B message (B) relative to other areas, in contrast to the {alpha}2A message. Finally, the center arrow marks the hippocampus, which has a level of {alpha}2A message as high as that in cerebral cortex but a lower level than cortex for {alpha}2B.

Medulla
The most intense hybridization signal in the medulla was seen with the {alpha}2A probe in the lateral reticular nucleus, hypoglossal nucleus, inferior olive, and ambiguous nucleus, followed by the gigantocellular reticular nucleus and dorsal motor nucleus of vagus (TableUp). The spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nucleus of the solitary tract, and spinal vestibular nucleus were also labeled by the {alpha}2A probe. As shown in Fig 7GDown, 7HDown, and 7IDown, the {alpha}2A probe showed higher density of {alpha}2A message in the nucleus of XII than in the nucleus of the solitary tract. The reverse distribution was found for the {alpha}2B message.



View larger version (215K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Photomicrographs taken from one case prepared fresh-frozen and cut on a cryostat at 15 µm before being incubated for in situ hybridization and then coated with emulsion and processed for autoradiography. Each row consists of matched sections separated by no more than 150 µm. A, D, and G (left) present dark-field photomicrographs that illustrate the distribution of the message for the {alpha}2A-adrenergic receptor ({alpha}2A-AR); C, F, and I (right) illustrate the distribution of message for the {alpha}2B-AR. B, E, and H (center) show bright-field photomicrographs of the autoradiographs on the right and illustrate the cytoarchitecture of these regions as seen with thionin stain. Arrows in the left and right columns indicate specific areas that show differential message for the {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs. For example, in the top row (A through C), the top arrow indicates the higher density of message for {alpha}2A (A) in the superficial (supragranular) layers of the neocortex (A) compared with the deeper (intragranular) layer (bottom arrow). In contrast, the density of the {alpha}2B-AR message (C) is more uniform. In the second row (D through F), the arrow illustrates the higher density of message for the {alpha}2A-AR in the locus coeruleus (D) compared with the lower but still significant density of the {alpha}2B-AR message (F). In the third row (G through I), arrows indicate the lower density of {alpha}2A message in the nucleus of the solitary tract and the higher density of {alpha}2A message in the nucleus of XII, whereas the reverse distribution is seen for {alpha}2B-AR message (I). In B, Roman numerals indicate the six layers of the neocortex. In E, CBL indicates cerebellum; gc, granule cell layer of cerebellum; pj, Purkinje cell layer of cerebellum; CG, central gray; DPB, dorsal parabrachial nucleus; MoV, motor nucleus of cranial nerve V; SCP, superior cerebellar peduncle; and VBP, ventral parabrachial nucleus. In H, Cu indicates cuneate nucleus; NTS, nucleus of the solitary tract; PCRt, parvicellular reticular formation of the medulla; and XII, nucleus of the 12th cranial nerve. Scale bar in I=500 µm.

Although {alpha}2B transcripts were never detected at the same overall intensity as {alpha}2A transcripts in medulla, relatively dense {alpha}2B labeling was seen in the lateral reticular nucleus and nucleus of the solitary tract. The gigantocellular reticular nucleus, dorsal motor nucleus of vagus, hypoglossal nucleus, and inferior olive were labeled with medium intensity, and the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal, ambiguous nucleus, and spinal vestibular nucleus were weakly labeled by the {alpha}2B probe.

Cerebellum
Neurons of both the molecular and granule cell layers of the cerebellum (see Fig 5Up) were labeled with both the {alpha}2A and {alpha}2B probes, although the {alpha}2B signal was less pronounced. Purkinje cells also showed more signal with the {alpha}2A probe, whereas {alpha}2B-specific labeling was less pronounced (TableUp and Fig 7DUp, 7E, 7F).

Pons and Midbrain
Both {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR transcripts were present at relatively high levels in the facial nucleus, gigantocellular reticular nucleus, pontine nucleus, and motor trigeminal nucleus (TableUp). In contrast, locus coeruleus showed the highest intensity signal with the {alpha}2A probe, and much less {alpha}2B signal was detected (Fig 7DUp, 7E, 7F). The central gray was one of the few regions where the {alpha}2B-AR appeared to be the dominant adrenoceptor. Dorsal and ventral cochlear nuclei, parvicellular reticular nucleus, and dorsal and ventral parabrachial nuclei showed similar, relatively intense signals of {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs.

Forebrain
The structures of the hippocampus and cerebral cortex showed similar, high-intensity signals for both {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-ARs, although {alpha}2A was higher than {alpha}2B in the hippocampus and the superficial layers of the neocortex (Fig 7AUp, 7B, 7C). In contrast, thalamus and hypothalamus were most strongly labeled by the {alpha}2B probe.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We have mapped the localization of {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR mRNAs in brain by in situ hybridization and RNase protection. These data suggest the presence of both of these messages throughout the brain, with different intensity patterns. The regions that appeared to have the most mRNA by protection assay (Fig 4Up) did not correlate with the regions that had the strongest signal, as judged by intensity imaging (Fig 6Up) of the in situ data. However, the protection assay was performed per amount of total RNA, whereas the intensity imaging was determined over an area of brain tissue. The in situ hybridization signal was not affected by the amount of total RNA in a particular structure, only the amount of the specific RNA targeted with the probe. On the other hand, RNase protection measured the amount of a particular {alpha}2-AR mRNA present in a mixture of RNAs. In this case, the signal detected would be affected by the total amount of RNA present.

Our results with the {alpha}2A probe largely agree with the results of studies using immunohistochemical methods12 13 as well as an in situ study by Nicholas et al.15 However, the current study has several differences compared with other in situ studies.16 17 For example, these other studies did not find {alpha}2A-AR expression in thalamus or the trigeminal nucleus, whereas we found {alpha}2A mRNA in both of these regions and in especially high levels in the trigeminal nucleus. In addition, we found {alpha}2A-AR mRNA in both the granule cell and molecular layers of the cerebellum, in contrast to Scheinin et al,17 who reported {alpha}2A mRNA only in the granule cell layer.

Unlike Nicholas et al,15 we detected {alpha}2B mRNA throughout the brain, whereas their report finds the {alpha}2B-AR only in the thalamic structures. This is in contrast to an earlier article by this same group that reported {alpha}2B expression throughout the brain.14

Most of the other in situ studies14 15 16 used end-labeled oligonucleotide probes, whereas we used single-stranded RNA probes that are synthesized in the presence of a radiolabeled ribonucleotide, producing a probe that is labeled throughout the synthesized RNA. Because of these differences in probes, the investigators with oligonucleotide probes used 4 to 6 weeks of exposure time. Similarly, another report17 used full-length cDNA to produce riboprobes; however, these investigators apparently used much fewer counts per microliter in their probe hybridizations and 8 weeks of exposure time. In contrast, we used only 6-7 days of exposure time. This suggests that our probes are much more sensitive than the oligonucleotide probes, and by altering probes and counts, we can detect much lower levels of mRNA with riboprobes than with oligonucleotide probes.

One could argue that cross-hybridization of our probes could account for our results. However, our probes have been extensively tested against cell lines that express only one {alpha}2-AR subtype, with no evidence for cross-reactivity. In addition, there are structures of the brain where the relative intensities of {alpha}2B and {alpha}2A differ; for example, in the medulla, the {alpha}2B message is more abundant in the nucleus of the solitary tract than the nucleus of XII, and the {alpha}2A message is more abundant in the nucleus of XII than the nucleus of the solitary tract. If the {alpha}2B cross-hybridizes to {alpha}2A mRNA, then one would expect to find {alpha}2B signal greatest in the regions where {alpha}2A has the greatest expression. This indicates that choosing RNA probes gives a higher sensitivity and specificity for visualization of various brain structures. It also suggests that cross-hybridization should be tested in known cell structures or cell lines that express a specific mRNA.

Our results have many implications for understanding the role of {alpha}2-AR in controlling cardiovascular regulation. We have found {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR mRNA in neurons of the central pathways involved in baroreflex, ie, within regions such as the nucleus of the solitary tract, the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus, the ambiguous nucleus, the inferior olive, and the reticular nucleus. Both {alpha}2A- and {alpha}2B-AR mRNAs are also detected in other areas involved with blood pressure regulation and the control of sympathetic outflow, such as the locus coeruleus or hypothalamus, although {alpha}2A predominates in the locus coeruleus. Our studies cannot determine whether both receptors are present in the same neurons or whether both receptors contribute to the control of arterial and pulse pressures. Analysis of subtype expression patterns in hypertensive versus normotensive animal models may provide insights into which subtype controls blood pressure. Previous studies have described differences in central {alpha}2-AR levels in normotensive and hypertensive animals.24 25 26 These studies have shown specific alterations in {alpha}2-AR in the medulla24 and alterations of {alpha}2-AR mRNA in the pons-medulla26 regions of spontaneously hypertensive versus Wistar-Kyoto rats. However, these studies did not precisely localize these changes. It is possible that in situ analysis will show whether these differences in expression occur in a region of the pons-medulla involved in blood pressure control. However, it is likely that more direct methods that can block or stimulate only one {alpha}2-AR subtype may be necessary to clarify the role of each {alpha}2-AR subtype in cardiovascular function. For example, antisense therapies or knockout animal models may be used to block specific subtype expression, or specific drugs can be used to inhibit or stimulate a single {alpha}2-AR subtype.

In terms of applying any findings in animal models to treatment strategies for human hypertension, the human brain has many more levels of complexity. In addition, although there are three {alpha}2-AR subtypes in human and rodent species, previous work has shown that differences in the pharmacology of analogous {alpha}2A-ARs in rodents and humans arise from a few specific nucleotide changes that specify changes in key amino acid residues and result in distinct ligand binding properties of highly related proteins.27 Likewise, genetic differences in regulatory regions of human and rodent {alpha}2-AR genes could contribute to differences in tissue-specific expression patterns between species.

In conclusion, using RNA antisense probes, we have found a significantly different distribution of mRNAs for {alpha}2-AR subtypes than other researchers using DNA probes. In addition to the increased sensitivity, we have found the RNA probes to be less time-consuming to use, with no evidence for cross-hybridization. Developing these probes for in situ hybridization is an important step for further studies on the exact role of the {alpha}2-AR subtypes in cardiovascular function modulated by neurons expressing these receptors.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants P01 AG00001, P01 NS31649, HL-48181, and HL-46693. Agostinho Tavares was supported in part by Brazilian grants 201579/90.1 (CNPq) and 93/4414-9 (FAPESP). We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Andrew Doolittle, Claudia Fitzgerald, and Ramy Rizkalla in the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology.

Received September 12, 1995; first decision October 23, 1995; accepted November 6, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hausler G. Cardiovascular regulation by central adrenergic mechanism and characterization by hypertensive drugs. Circ Res. 1975;36/37(suppl I):I-232-I-233.

2. Unnerstall JR, Kopajtic TA, Kuhar MJ. Distribution of alpha2 agonist binding sites in the rat and human central nervous system: analysis of some functional, anatomic correlates of the pharmacologic effects of clonidine and related adrenergic agents. Brain Res. 1984;319:69-101. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Reis JD, Golanov EV, Ruggiero DA, Sun MK. Sympatho-excitatory neurons of the rostral ventrolateral medulla are oxygen sensors and essential elements in the tonic and reflex control of the systemic and cerebral circulations. J Hypertens. 1994;12:S159-S180.

4. Punnen S, Urbanski R, Krieger AJ, Sapru HN. Ventrolateral medullary pressor area: site of hypotensive action of clonidine. Brain Res. 1987;422:336-346. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Bylund DB. Subtypes of {alpha}1 and {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors. FASEB J. 1992;6:832-839. [Abstract]

6. Lorenz W, Lomasney JW, Collins S, Regan JW, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ. Expression of three {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat tissues: implications for receptor classification. Mol Pharmacol. 1990;38:599-603. [Abstract]

7. Handy DE, Flordellis CS, Bogdanova NN, Bresnahan MR, Gavras H. Diverse tissue expression of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor genes. Hypertension. 1993;21:861-865. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Coupry I, Duzic E, Lanier SM. Factors determining the specificity of signal transduction by guanine nucleotide-binding protein-coupled receptors, II: preferential coupling of the {alpha}2C-adrenergic receptor to the guanine nucleotide binding protein, Go. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:9852-9857. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Flordellis CS, Berguerand M, Gouache P, Barbu V, Gavras H, Handy DE, Bereziat G, Masliah J. {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells activate differentially mitogen-activated protein kinase by a p21ras independent pathway. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:3491-3494. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Zeng D, Lynch KR. Distribution of alpha-2 adrenergic receptor mRNAs in the rat CNS. Mol Brain Res. 1991;10:219-225. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Boyajian CL, Loughlin SE, Leslie FM. Anatomical evidence for alpha-2 adrenoceptor heterogeneity: differential autoradiographic distribution of [3H]rauwolcine and [3H]idaxozan in rat brain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1987;241:1079-1091. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Rosin DL, Zeng D, Stornetta RL, Norton FR, Riley T, Okusa MD, Guyenet PG, Lynch KR. Immunohistochemical localization of alpha2A-adrenergic receptors in catecholaminergic and other brainstem neurons in the rat. Neuroscience. 1993;56:139-155. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Aoki C, Go CG. Perikaryal and synaptic localization of alpha 2A-adrenergic receptor-like immunoactivity. Brain Res. 1994;650:181-204. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Nicholas AP, Pieribone VA, Elde R, Hokfelt T. Initial observations on the localization of mRNA for alpha and beta adrenergic receptors in brain and peripheral tissues of rat using in situ hybridization. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1991;2:344-350.

15. Nicholas AP, Pieribone V, Hokfelt T. Distributions of mRNAs for alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtypes in rat brain: an in situ hybridization study. J Comp Neurol. 1993;328:575-594. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. McCune SK, Voigt MM, Hill JM. Expression of multiple alpha-adrenergic receptor subtype messenger RNAs in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience. 1993;57:143-151. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Scheinin M, Lomasney JW, Hayden-Hixson DM, Schambra UB, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Fremeau RT Jr. Distribution of {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtype gene expression in rat brain. Mol Brain Res. 1994;21:133-149. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Zeng D, Harrison JK, D'Angelo DD, Barber CM, Tucker AL, Lu Z, Lynch KR. Molecular characterization of a rat alpha2B-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:3102-3106. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Sassoon D, Lyons G, Wright WE, Lin V, Lassar A, Weintraub H, Buckingham M. Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and myoD1 during mouse embryogenesis. Nature. 1989;341:303-307. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1982.

21. Praz GA, Halban PA, Wollheim CB, Blondel B, Strauss AJ, Renold AE. Regulation of immunoreactive-insulin release from a rat cell line (RINm5F). Biochem J. 1983;210:345-352. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Flordellis C, Handy DE, Bresnahan MR, Zannis VI, Gavras H. Cloning and expression of a rat brain alpha2B-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:1019-1023. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Handy DE, McCluskey J, Lew AM, Coligan JE, Margulies DH. Signals controlling alternative splicing of major histocompatibility complex H-2 class I pre-mRNA. Immunogenetics. 1988;28:81-90. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Yamada S, Ashizawa N, Nakayama K, Tomita T, Hayashi E. Decreased density of {alpha}2-adrenoceptors in medulla oblongata of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;13:440-446. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Olmos G, Miralles A, Basturent G, Garcia-Sevilla JA. Decreased density and sensitivity of alpha-2-adrenoceptors in the brain of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;205:93-96. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Castellano M, Handy DE, Flordellis C, Beschi M, Gavras H. Gene expression of catecholaminergic receptors in the central nervous system of hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1991;9:S54-S55.

27. Link R, Daunt D, Barsh G, Chruscinski A, Kobilka B. Cloning of two mouse genes encoding {alpha}2-adrenergic receptor subtypes and identification of a single amino acid in the mouse {alpha}2-C10 homolog responsible for an interspecies variation in antagonist binding. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;42:16-27.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Z. Xie, S. V. Westmoreland, and G. M. Miller
Modulation of Monoamine Transporters by Common Biogenic Amines via Trace Amine-Associated Receptor 1 and Monoamine Autoreceptors in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells and Brain Synaptosomes
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 629 - 640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D.-P. Li, L. M. Atnip, S.-R. Chen, and H.-L. Pan
Regulation of Synaptic Inputs to Paraventricular-Spinal Output Neurons by {alpha}2 Adrenergic Receptors
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2005; 93(1): 393 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
P. J. Pauwels, I. Rauly, and T. Wurch
Dissimilar Pharmacological Responses by a New Series of Imidazoline Derivatives at Precoupled and Ligand-Activated {alpha}2A-Adrenoceptor States: Evidence for Effector Pathway-Dependent Differential Antagonism
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 1015 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. F. Davies, F. Haimor, G. Lighthall, and J. D. Clark
Dexmedetomidine Fails to Cause Hyperalgesia After Cessation of Chronic Administration
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2003; 96(1): 195 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
V. Reja, A. K. Goodchild, and P. M. Pilowsky
Catecholamine-Related Gene Expression Correlates With Blood Pressures in SHR
Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 342 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
C. Plut, C. Ribiere, Y. Giudicelli, and J.-P. Dausse
Gender Differences in Hypothalamic Tyrosine Hydroxylase and alpha 2-Adrenoceptor Subtype Gene Expression in Cafeteria Diet-Induced Hypertension and Consequences of Neonatal Androgenization
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2002; 302(2): 525 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. J. A. Janssen and J. F. M. Smits
Autonomic control of blood pressure in mice: basic physiology and effects of genetic modification
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): R1545 - R1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Yamazato, A. Sakima, J. Nakazato, S. Sesoko, H. Muratani, and K. Fukiyama
Hypotensive and sedative effects of clonidine injected into the rostral ventrolateral medulla of conscious rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): R1868 - R1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. Kintsurashvili, I. Gavras, C. Johns, and H. Gavras
Effects of Antisense Oligodeoxynucleotide Targeting of the {alpha}2B-Adrenergic Receptor Messenger RNA in the Central Nervous System
Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1075 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Snapir, P. Heinonen, T.-P. Tuomainen, P. Alhopuro, M. K. Karvonen, T. A. Lakka, K. Nyyssonen, R. Salonen, J. Kauhanen, V.-P. Valkonen, et al.
An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the {alpha}2b-adrenergic receptor gene is a novel genetic risk factor for acute coronary events
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2001; 37(6): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. P. Makaritsis, C. Johns, I. Gavras, and H. Gavras
Role of {alpha}2-Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes in the Acute Hypertensive Response to Hypertonic Saline Infusion in Anephric Mice
Hypertension, February 1, 2000; 35(2): 609 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
W. Zhang, V. Klimek, J. T. Farley, M.-Y. Zhu, and G. A. Ordway
alpha 2C Adrenoceptors Inhibit Adenylyl Cyclase in Mouse Striatum: Potential Activation by Dopamine
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 1999; 289(3): 1286 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. P. Makaritsis, D. E. Handy, C. Johns, B. Kobilka, I. Gavras, and H. Gavras
Role of the {alpha}2B-Adrenergic Receptor in the Development of Salt-Induced Hypertension
Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 14 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. E. Handy, C. Johns, M. R. Bresnahan, A. Tavares, M. Bursztyn, and H. Gavras
Expression of {alpha}2-Adrenergic Receptors in Normal and Atherosclerotic Rabbit Aorta
Hypertension, August 1, 1998; 32(2): 311 - 317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. M. Small, K. M. Brown, S. L. Forbes, and S. B. Liggett
Polymorphic Deletion of Three Intracellular Acidic Residues of the alpha 2B-Adrenergic Receptor Decreases G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase-mediated Phosphorylation and Desensitization
J. Biol. Chem., February 9, 2001; 276(7): 4917 - 4922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gavras, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tavares, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gavras, H.