(Hypertension. 1996;27:1165-1172.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Renal Division, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of São Paulo (Brazil) School of Medicine, and Department of Pharmacology, State University of Campinas (Brazil) School of Medicine.
Correspondence to Roberto Zatz, MD, PhD, Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Renal, Av Dr Arnaldo, 455, 3-s/67, 01246-903 São Paulo SP, Brazil.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) leads to severe and progressive hypertension. The role of salt
intake in this model is unclear. To verify whether salt dependence in
this model is related to the extent of nitric oxide inhibition, we gave
adult male Munich-Wistar rats a low salt, standard salt, or high salt
diet and oral L-NAME treatment at either 3 or 25 mg/kg per day. At 10
to 15 days of treatment, the slope of the pressure-natriuresis line
was decreased in rats receiving low-dose L-NAME compared with
untreated controls. In rats treated with the higher dose, the line was
shifted to the right but remained parallel to that obtained in
untreated controls. Renal vascular resistance was moderately increased
in rats receiving low-dose L-NAME, whereas high-dose L-NAME
induced a marked vasoconstriction that was aggravated by salt overload.
Low-dose L-NAME treatment induced hypertension only when associated
with sodium overload. In rats receiving high-dose L-NAME,
hypertension was aggravated by sodium excess but was not ameliorated by
sodium restriction. Long-term (6 weeks) L-NAME treatment was
associated with progressive hypertension, which was aggravated by salt
overload, and with the development of albuminuria, focal
glomerular collapse,
glomerulosclerosis, and renal
interstitial expansion. These abnormalities were worsened
by salt overload and largely prevented by salt restriction. In the
model of chronic nitric oxide blockade, salt dependence is a function
of the inhibitor dose, and renal injury varies directly
with the level of salt intake.
Key Words: nitric oxide kidney salt pressure natriuresis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pathogenetic role of salt retention in this model is particularly controversial. Several investigators have reported evidence that sodium retention contributes to the development of hypertension in this model,3 4 that administration of pressor4 and subpressor5 doses of NO inhibitors induces salt sensitivity, and that a deficient NO response may underlie spontaneously occurring salt sensitivity.6 Consistent with these findings, other studies have shown that acute NO inhibition shifts the pressure-natriuresis relationship to the right, thereby impairing renal sodium excretion capability.7 8 Similar results were obtained by chronic infusion of an NO inhibitor directly into the renal medulla.9 However, other studies of chronic NO inhibition failed to disclose any effect on BP of concomitant salt restriction10 or excess.11 12 In addition, sodium balance was found not to be affected in these rats,13 casting doubt as to whether salt retention occurs in this model. The reasons for these conflicting results are unclear. However, it must be noted that these studies have used widely varying doses of NO inhibitors. Conceivably, lower-grade NO inhibition might subtly impair renal sodium excretory capability and promote salt-dependent hypertension, whereas severe and generalized vasoconstriction14 might predominate with more complete NO inhibition. Indeed, those studies indicating salt sensitivity in this model tended to use relatively low or even subpressor doses of NO inhibitors.3 4 5 Additionally, in none of these studies was sodium intake varied between extremes, such as needed, for instance, to demonstrate salt sensitivity in Dahl rats.6
In the present study, we examined renal and systemic hemodynamics and renal histology at two different levels of NO inhibition combined with three widely differing levels of salt intake. In addition, we examined the effect of chronic NO inhibition on the pressure-natriuresis relationship. In this manner, we were able to explore in detail the interaction of NO inhibition and salt intake in this model.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Groups
Rats were distributed among nine experimental groups. (1) Group
LS0: Rats received an LS diet and no drug treatment. (2) Group LS3:
Rats received an LS diet and the NO inhibitor L-NAME, 0.12
mmol/L, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 3 mg/kg. In
preliminary experiments, this dose was shown to promote little or no
increase in BP even after several weeks of treatment. (3) Group LS25:
Rats received an LS diet and 1 mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily
ingestion of approximately 25 mg/kg. In preliminary experiments, this
dose was shown to reproducibly promote progressive systemic
hypertension. (4) Group SS0: Rats received an SS diet and no drug
treatment. (5) Group SS3: Rats received an SS diet and 0.12 mmol/L
L-NAME in the drinking water, corresponding to an average intake of
approximately 3 mg/kg per day. (6) Group SS25: Rats received an SS diet
and 1 mmol/L L-NAME in the drinking water, corresponding to an average
intake of approximately 25 mg/kg per day. (7) Group HS0: Rats received
an HS diet and no drug treatment. (8) Group HS3: Rats received an HS
diet and 0.06 mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily ingestion of
approximately 3 mg/kg. Since rats on an HS diet drank twice as much
water as those on an LS diet, L-NAME concentrations in the drinking
water were correspondingly adjusted to ensure that HS3 rats received
the same dose of the inhibitor as SS3 and LS3 rats, namely,
3 mg/kg per day. (9) Group HS25: Rats received an HS diet and 0.5
mmol/L L-NAME, corresponding to a daily ingestion of approximately 25
mg/kg. As in the preceding group, L-NAME concentrations in the drinking
water were adjusted to compensate for the higher water intake of rats
on an HS diet. All salt regimens were started 1 week before L-NAME
treatment was initiated.
Pressure-Natriuresis Curves
In 8 additional rats of group SS0, 11 of group SS3, 12 of group
SS25, 15 of group HS0, 14 of group HS3, and 14 of group HS25, the
pressure-natriuresis curve was determined at 2 weeks of treatment
with a modified form of the method described by Roman and
Cowley.15 Rats were anesthetized with 100 mg/kg
thiobutabarbital IP and placed on a temperature-controlled surgical
table. Rectal temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C. The femoral
artery was cannulated with PE-50 tubing for continuous monitoring of
mean arterial pressure by a Statham P23Db pressure
transducer connected to a chart recorder (model A8200, Anamed
Instruments). After tracheotomy, the left jugular vein was catheterized
with PE-50 tubing for infusion of homologous plasma to replace surgical
losses and keep a euvolemic state.16 An amount of plasma
equivalent to 1% body weight was given over about 45 minutes, followed
by an infusion of 0.5 to 1.0 mL/h for the remainder of the experiment.
PE-50 tubing was also placed in the right jugular vein for
maintenance of a continuous saline infusion (1.5 mL/h)
throughout the experiment. The right carotid artery was cannulated with
PE-50 tubing for continuous BP monitoring at the late phases of the
experiment (see below). The left ureter was catheterized with PE-10
tubing. About 2.5 hours after anesthesia, urine was
collected during 20 minutes at baseline femoral arterial
pressure for determination of flow and sodium excretion rates. Femoral
arterial pressure (and hence renal perfusion pressure) was
then lowered by 20 to 25 mm Hg with an inflatable cuff placed around
the abdominal aorta just above the emergence of the renal arteries.
After stabilization for 15 minutes, urine collection was repeated. The
cuff was then deflated and the superior mesenteric and celiac arteries
were ligated to raise renal perfusion pressure above baseline. Since
urine flow always increased dramatically with this procedure, the
saline infusion rate was raised at this time to 3 mL/h. After a new
15-minute stabilization period, a third timed urine sample was
obtained. A bulldog clamp was then placed around the abdominal aorta
below the renal arteries to further elevate renal perfusion pressure,
now estimated by carotid pressure. After 15 minutes, a final urine
sample was obtained. Urine samples were always obtained in this exact
order. The experiment was discarded whenever the rat exhibited
prolonged (>10 minutes) hemodynamic instability. Since
renal mass reduction markedly aggravates injury in rats with chronic NO
blockade,17 rats were not subjected to uninephrectomy
before these experiments. Likewise, exogenous infusions of vasoactive
compounds and renal denervation15 were not performed,
because the pathogenesis of hypertension in this chronic model likely
involves the participation of several
vasoconstrictors1 18 19 20 as well as altered sympathetic
output to the kidneys.21 22 23
Renal Functional Studies
For assessment of renal hemodynamics, 8 rats of
groups LS0, 8 of group LS3, 8 of group LS25, 8 of group HS0, 8 of group
HS3, and 8 of group HS25 were anesthetized at 10 to 15 days
with thiobutabarbital and placed on a temperature-controlled
surgical table for maintenance of rectal temperature at
37±0.5°C. The left femoral artery, jugular veins, trachea, and left
ureter were cannulated as described above. Homologous plasma was
infused through the left jugular as described above. Saline solution
containing 14C-tagged inulin (2 µCi/mL) was infused
through the right jugular at 1.5 mL/h in rats fed an LS diet and 3 mL/h
in those given an HS diet. About 2.5 hours after
anesthesia, urine was collected during 25 to 35 minutes for
determination of flow rate and inulin clearance. Whole-kidney
filtration fraction (FF) was determined by simultaneous
collection of blood samples from the femoral artery and renal vein and
measurement of the respective 14C activities in a
scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments) for calculation of inulin
extraction. Blood was obtained from the renal vein with a sharpened
glass micropipette (about 40 µm OD). Renal plasma flow (RPF) was
calculated as RPF=GFR/FF, where GFR is glomerular
filtration rate. Renal total vascular resistance (RVR) was estimated by
RVR=MAP(1-Ht)/RPF, where MAP is mean arterial
pressure, Ht is arterial hematocrit, and RPF is renal
plasma flow. At the end of the experiment, the renal tissue was
perfusion-fixed at the observed BP with Dubosq-Brazil solution
after a brief washout with saline.
Long-term Studies
Eight rats of each group were followed for up to 6 weeks of
treatment. Mean BP, estimated by a tail-cuff method24 ;
PRA, assayed in tail blood samples; and urinary albumin
excretion rate were obtained at 3 and 6 weeks. At the end of 6 weeks,
the rats were anesthetized with 50 mg/kg pentobarbital IP. The
renal tissue was then perfusion-fixed in situ with Dubosq-Brazil
solution after a brief washout with saline and examined by light
microscopy for evaluation of glomerular and
interstitial injury.
Analytic Methods
Urinary albumin excretion rate was determined by a
radial immunodiffusion technique.25 PRA was measured by an
enzymatic technique26 adapted for small samples. Urinary
sodium concentration was determined by flame photometry.
Histological Techniques
After perfusion fixation, two midcoronal slices of the right
kidney were embedded in paraffin, and 2- to 3-µm-thick sections
were stained by the PAS reaction for examination by light microscopy.
Additional sections were stained with Masson's trichrome for
measurement of fractional interstitial area. Tissue was
examined in a blinded fashion by light microscopy at x160
magnification. At least 300 glomeruli were examined for each rat.
Glomeruli exhibiting global collapse or sclerosis were identified
according to criteria described previously27 and detailed
in "Results." The frequency of collapsed glomeruli was expressed
as a percentage of the total number of glomeruli examined. For
assessment of the extent of interstitial expansion, the
fraction of renal cortex occupied by interstitial tissue
staining positively for collagen was quantitatively evaluated in
Masson-stained sections by a point-counting
technique28 in 25 consecutive microscopic fields examined
at a final magnification of x400 under a 110-point ocular grid.
Statistics
Differences among groups were compared by two-way ANOVA with
pairwise Bonferroni comparisons.29
Pressure-natriuresis lines were obtained by least-squares
regression analysis. Significance of the differences between
curves was assessed by comparison of linear regression slopes and
intercepts.30 A value of P<.05 was considered
significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Renal and systemic hemodynamic parameters
measured at 10 to 15 days of treatment in LS and HS groups are shown in
the Table
. Body growth was similar among groups. Left
kidney weight was not significantly altered by either L-NAME treatment
or dietary salt intake, except for group HS3, which had slightly larger
kidneys. Mean arterial pressure was not significantly
affected by dietary sodium in the absence of L-NAME treatment. However,
sodium intake was decisive for the establishment of
arterial hypertension in rats receiving low-dose
L-NAME. LS diet significantly attenuated arterial
hypertension in rats receiving high-dose L-NAME, although it failed
to normalize BP in these rats. Low-dose L-NAME (groups LS3 and HS3)
did not significantly affect glomerular filtration rate.
However, glomerular filtration rate was moderately
decreased in groups LS25 and HS25, although only in the latter did the
differences with the respective control achieve statistical
significance. Filtration fraction was similar among groups, except for
groups LS25 and HS25. Accordingly, renal plasma flow was lowered in
these two groups compared with their respective controls. Renal
vascular resistance was insensitive to salt intake in untreated rats.
Low-dose L-NAME treatment increased renal vascular resistance by
41% in rats receiving an LS diet and by 48% in those given an HS
diet. Vasoconstriction was more severe in rats receiving high-dose
L-NAME.
|
Long-term treatment with L-NAME was associated with normal body
growth in all groups except group HS25, in which body weight (262±9 g)
was low compared with rats receiving either low-dose L-NAME and
salt overload (HS3, 307±11 g) or high-dose L-NAME and salt
restriction (LS25, 322±5 g). No limitation to body growth was seen in
the other groups. The evolution of tail-cuff pressure during 6
weeks of treatment is shown in Fig 2
. Tail-cuff
pressure increased steadily in group HS3 compared with untreated
controls, reaching 152±8 mm Hg after 6 weeks of treatment, compared
with 124±4 mm Hg in group HS0 (P<.05). Salt restriction
prevented BP elevation in group LS3, characterizing the development of
hypertension at this L-NAME dose as salt dependent. Rats receiving
high-dose L-NAME and HS intake (group HS25) developed more severe
and rapidly progressive hypertension, reaching 170±10 mm Hg after 6
weeks of treatment. Since the mortality rate in this group was 20%, as
opposed to 0% in the remaining groups, and since it is likely that the
BPs of the rats that died would have been even higher at 6 weeks, the
tail-cuff pressure measured at the end of the study may have
underestimated the severity of the hemodynamic
derangement occurring in this group. Salt restriction attenuated but
did not prevent hypertension in group LS25 (145±4 versus 118±1 mm Hg
in group LS0, P<.05).
|
As expected, plasma renin levels were persistently higher in rats
receiving an LS diet than in those given salt excess (Fig 3
). Low-dose L-NAME treatment had little effect on
PRA in rats receiving an HS diet but promoted a steady decline in renin
levels in rats given an LS diet. High-dose L-NAME treatment
depressed PRA even faster in rats receiving an LS diet. In rats
receiving an HS diet, high-dose L-NAME further lowered circulating
renin levels at 3 weeks but markedly increased PRA at 6 weeks of
treatment.
|
Albumin excretion rate (Fig 4
) was increased at
6 weeks of treatment in group HS3, reaching 30.2±18.3 mg/24 h,
although this variation did not reach statistical significance compared
with groups HS0 (1.3±0.3 mg/24 h) and LS3 (1.2±0.2 mg/24 h). Urinary
albumin excretion rate was numerically increased in group SS25,
reaching 19.9±7.0 mg/24 h, although this value did not differ
statistically from those observed in groups LS25 (2.7±0.6 mg/24 h) and
SS3 (1.3±0.3 mg/24 h). In group HS25, however, albuminuria
rose steadily from the beginning of the study, reaching 168±22 mg/24 h
at 6 weeks (P<.05 versus groups HS0, HS3, and LS25).
|
Fig 5
shows the three most frequently occurring
modalities of renal injury encountered in L-NAMEtreated
rats.27 Collapsed glomeruli (Fig 5
, top) appeared reduced
in size, with prominent thickening of the basement membrane and extreme
narrowing of capillary loops, without adhesions to Bowman's capsule.
Glomerulosclerosis (Fig 5
, middle) was defined
as tuft deposition of PAS-positive material with loop occlusion and/or
adhesions to Bowman's capsule. Interstitial expansion (Fig 5
, bottom) consisted of focal enlargement of interstitial
tissue, with infiltration by fibroblasts and deposition of
collagen-like material, frequently associated with tubular atrophy
and vacuolization. Confluence of these areas was seen in more severely
affected rats. Fig 6
, left, depicts the frequency of
glomerular collapse in the groups studied. In group SS25,
15.9±4.3% of glomeruli presented with tuft collapse
(P<.05 versus SS0 and SS3), whereas sodium excess increased
the frequency of these glomeruli in group HS25 (28.5±3.4%,
P<.05 versus groups HS0 and HS3). Sodium restriction
attenuated glomerular collapse in group LS25 (7.0±1.4%,
P<.05 versus HS25 and P>.1 versus LS0).
Parallel results were obtained regarding
glomerulosclerosis (Fig 6
, middle) and
interstitial expansion (Fig 6
, right). Focal and segmental
necrosis of the glomerular tuft appeared in nearly 1.2% of
glomeruli examined in group HS25 but was virtually absent in the other
groups. Arteriolar wall thickening was observed in group HS3 and, more
often, in group HS25. Fibrinoid necrosis of the arteriolar wall was
seen only in group HS25.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Salt sensitivity was less pronounced at higher L-NAME doses. Although massive salt overload did elevate final BP by 25 mm Hg compared with rats receiving an SS diet, reduction of salt intake to very low levels had little effect on BP. These results are in keeping with those reported previously in rats treated with relatively high doses of L-NAME10 11 12 and characterize a relatively salt-insensitive hypertension in this setting. Again, these effects of salt intake were predicted by the pressure-natriuresis/diuresis relationship obtained in this group. As in rats treated with low-dose L-NAME, the regression lines were shifted to the right, indicating that higher BPs were required for excretion of a given amount of sodium and water. However, the slopes of these lines were indistinguishable from those of control, indicating a resetting of the pressure-natriuresis relationship and predicting (1) no more salt sensitivity in these rats than in untreated controls and (2) little BP effect of salt deprivation compared with SS intake, as effectively observed in this group.
Although the analysis of the pressure-natriuresis/diuresis lines helps the understanding in phenomenological terms of the complex interplay between salt intake and different levels of NO inhibition in the generation of hypertension, the mechanistic aspects involved in this setting are unclear. Administration of low-dose L-NAME in the present study promoted a 40% increase in renal vascular resistance, whereas higher-grade NO inhibition increased renal vascular resistance by more than twofold. Although these hemodynamic effects may contribute to the discordant responses of the pressure-natriuresis relationship to differing doses of L-NAME, they may also reflect simple autoregulation. On the other hand, previous studies showed that selective NO production at the inner medulla in response to variations in renal perfusion pressure may strongly influence sodium excretion by modifying local blood flow9 31 32 and/or by directly influencing tubular sodium transport.33 Further investigation is necessary for determination of whether L-NAME has a dose-dependent effect on these mechanisms, thus explaining the differing functional effects of high and low doses of the inhibitor. Additional limitation to renal sodium excretion may have originated from an enhanced renal sympathetic influx,21 22 23 as well as from activation of the renin-angiotensin system.10 19
Of particular interest was the behavior of plasma renin levels in these experiments. As expected, PRA was depressed by sodium excess and augmented by sodium restriction in rats not receiving L-NAME, compared with levels previously observed in rats receiving an SS diet.1 27 34 Low doses of L-NAME promoted a progressive decline in PRA in both salt-depleted and salt-loaded rats, whereas the initial depression of renin levels was even faster with high L-NAME doses, suggesting that whatever the level of salt repletion, renin production at least partially depends on NO availability. These results are consistent with several recent studies from this laboratory and elsewhere in which chronic NO inhibition, at least in the initial weeks of treatment, was reported to lower circulating renin levels.1 10 11 27 34 They are also in accordance with the observed depression of renin levels by acute L-NAME treatment in vivo35 36 and in isolated perfused rat kidneys37 38 and by the observation that endothelium-derived NO enhances renin secretion in cultivated juxtaglomerular cells.39 Later in the course of treatment, renin levels were markedly and paradoxically elevated in rats receiving high-dose L-NAME and dietary sodium overload, confirming previous observations of this laboratory.1 27 In these rats, hyperreninemia is unlikely to reflect a primary effect of NO on renin production. Rather, enhanced renin production appears to result from the profound structural derangement of the renal parenchyma, especially the extensive glomerular ischemia associated with this model. Hyperreninemia is likely to have contributed to aggravation of hypertension in this group at the late stages of the study. However, the initiation and maintenance of hypertension at the initial phase of this process appear to bear no direct relationship to the circulating renin levels, which were elevated in the face of normal BPs in LS rats receiving low-dose L-NAME and depressed in HS rats given the same dose of the inhibitor that nevertheless were always hypertensive. Since administration of renin-angiotensin antagonists has been shown to largely prevent hypertension in this model,1 27 40 the beneficial effects of these drugs must depend on some aspect of the renin-angiotensin system not directly related to circulating renin levels.
The renal parenchymal injury observed at 6 weeks in L-NAMEtreated rats not subjected to salt restriction may have contributed additionally to the development of hypertension. As described previously,1 27 the most frequent structural abnormality encountered in these rats was a global collapse of the glomerular tuft, consistent with severe glomerular ischemia. Correa-Rotter and coworkers41 reported evidence that these glomeruli, also found in the renal ablation model,41 42 may release excessive amounts of renin, which in turn might promote the development of both systemic hypertension43 and renal structural injury.42 Exacerbation of this abnormality by salt overload coincided with aggravation of systemic hypertension, especially at later stages, suggesting a pathogenetic role for inadequately "high" circulating and/or local renin levels. Sodium restriction prevented both hypertension and glomerular collapse, further suggesting a pathogenetic association between these two phenomena. The mechanisms whereby salt intake levels might influence the development of glomerular collapse are unclear. NO inhibition and sodium overload might interact to promote severe afferent constriction, an abnormality shown in this and previous studies27 to associate with glomerular collapse. Sodium overload has been shown to increase cytosolic free calcium concentrations in erythrocytes.44 Although direct experimental evidence in this regard is lacking, excess sodium might influence smooth muscle cells similarly, thus favoring vasoconstriction. Conversely, sodium restriction might promote smooth muscle relaxation by lowering cytosolic calcium concentration, thus exerting a protective effect akin to that previously obtained in this model with chronic nifedipine treatment.45 Alternatively, glomerular collapse may have resulted directly from systemic hypertension. Although this hypothesis would also explain the observed prevention of glomerular collapse by salt restriction, it must be noted that hypertension as severe as that observed in this study is not associated with glomerular collapse in models such as the spontaneously hypertensive rat,46 renal ablation,47 or the Milan hypertensive rat.48
The present study confirms previous observations of this laboratory that renal interstitial fibrosis is a prominent feature of the structural derangement observed in rats receiving chronic L-NAME treatment and that this process is worsened by simultaneous sodium overload.27 In addition, sodium restriction largely prevented renal interstitial expansion in L-NAMEtreated rats, regardless of the dose used. Given the antimitogenic properties of NO,49 50 51 renal interstitial enlargement in this model may be related at least in part to abnormal cell proliferation. Sodium overload has been shown to elevate cytosolic calcium concentration,44 whereas the latter has been consistently linked to activation of mitogenesis.52 53 54 Thus, it is possible that in the chronic NO blockade model, sodium overload aggravates interstitial expansion by enhancing cell proliferation, whereas sodium restriction has the opposite effect. In the absence of direct experimental evidence, however, this possibility must remain speculative.
In summary, the present observations indicate that chronic NO inhibition promotes salt-dependent hypertension. However, salt dependence can be demonstrated only at a relatively low dose of the inhibitor. Hypertension resulting from higher doses of the inhibitor is aggravated by dietary salt overload but cannot be prevented by salt restriction. Whatever the dose of NO inhibitor used, sodium restriction largely prevents the renal parenchymal injury associated with this model. Elucidation of the intimate mechanisms dictating the pathogenetic interaction between chronic NO inhibition and salt intake levels awaits further investigation.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 20, 1995; first decision December 18, 1995; accepted January 22, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Francois, N. Makhanova, P. Ruiz, J. Ellison, L. Mao, H. A. Rockman, and T. M. Coffman A role for the thromboxane receptor in L-NAME hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): F1096 - F1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carlstrom, R. D. Brown, J. Edlund, J. Sallstrom, E. Larsson, T. Teerlink, F. Palm, N. Wahlin, and A. E. G. Persson Role of nitric oxide deficiency in the development of hypertension in hydronephrotic animals Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): F362 - F370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Augustyniak, R. G. Victor, D. A. Morgan, and W. Zhang L-NAME- and ADMA-induced sympathetic neural activation in conscious rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R726 - R732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopkan and D. S.A. Majid Enhanced Superoxide Activity Modulates Renal Function in NO-Deficient Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, March 1, 2006; 47(3): 568 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kopkan and D. S. A. Majid Superoxide Contributes to Development of Salt Sensitivity and Hypertension Induced by Nitric Oxide Deficiency Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 1026 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rossi, E. Chiurlia, A. Nuzzo, E. Cioni, G. Origliani, and M. G. Modena Flow-mediated vasodilation and the risk of developing hypertension in healthy postmenopausal women J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 19, 2004; 44(8): 1636 - 1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bourraindeloup, C. Adamy, G. Candiani, M. Cailleret, M.-C. Bourin, T. Badoual, J. B. Su, S. Adubeiro, F. Roudot-Thoraval, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, et al. N-Acetylcysteine Treatment Normalizes Serum Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Level and Hinders the Progression of Cardiac Injury in Hypertensive Rats Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 2003 - 2009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Graciano, R. d. C. Cavaglieri, H. Delle, W. V. Dominguez, D. E. Casarini, D. M. A. C. Malheiros, and I. L. Noronha Intrarenal Renin-Angiotensin System Is Upregulated in Experimental Model of Progressive Renal Disease Induced by Chronic Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthesis J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1805 - 1815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ying, M. Flamant, S. Vandermeersch, J.-J. Boffa, C. Chatziantoniou, J.-C. Dussaule, and D. Chansel Renal Effects of Omapatrilat and Captopril in Salt-Loaded, Nitric Oxide-Deficient Rats Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 937 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. SEELIGER, P. B. PERSSON, W. BOEMKE, G. MOLLENHAUER, B. NAFZ, and H. W. REINHARDT Low-Dose Nitric Oxide Inhibition Produces a Negative Sodium Balance in Conscious Dogs J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2001; 12(6): 1128 - 1136. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. Fujihara, D. M. Avancini Costa Malheiros, I. de Lourdes Noronha, G. De Nucci, and R. Zatz Mycophenolate Mofetil Reduces Renal Injury in the Chronic Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition Model Hypertension, January 1, 2001; 37(1): 170 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Arcos, C. K. Fujihara, A. Sesso, E. Brandao De Almeida Prado, M. J. Brandao De Almeida Prado, G. De Nucci, and R. Zatz Mechanisms of albuminuria in the chronic nitric oxide inhibition model Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): F1060 - F1066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Alvarez, A. Osuna, R. Wangensteen, and F. Vargas Interaction Between Nitric Oxide and Mineralocorticoids in the Long-Term Control of Blood Pressure Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 752 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
< |