Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1996;27:1267-1272

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Mello, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Mello, W. C.

(Hypertension. 1996;27:1267-1272.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Renin-Angiotensin System and Cell Communication in the Failing Heart

Walmor C. De Mello

From the Departments of Pharmacology and Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract The influence of heart failure on the process of cell communication was investigated in cell pairs isolated from the ventricle of cardiomyopathic hamsters (11 months old) and the results compared with age-matched normal hamsters. The gap junctional conductance (gj) was measured with two voltage-clamp amplifiers. The results showed two major populations of cell pairs with respect to gj values: one with very low values (0.8 to 2.5 nS) and the other with higher values (7 to 35 nS). In normal hamsters, the most frequent gj values were in the range of 40 to 100 nS. Angiotensin II (Ang II, 1 µg/mL) caused cell uncoupling in myopathic myocytes with low gj but reduced gj by 53±6.6% (±SE) in cell pairs with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS). The effect of Ang II on gj of myopathic cell pairs was suppressed by losartan (10-7 mol/L). In cardiomyopathic cell pairs with low gj (0.8 to 2.5 nS), enalapril (1 µg/mL) caused an appreciable increase in gj (219±20.3%), whereas in cell pairs with higher gj (7 to 35 nS), the gj increment was smaller (80±10.8%) but still larger than that seen in controls (33±5.4%). Intracellular dialysis of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) abolished cell communication in myopathic cell pairs with low gj (0.8 to 2.5 nS) and reduced gj by 66±1.7% in the other pairs (7 to 35 nS). The effect of Ang I on gj was greatly reduced by enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) added to the cytosol. Dialysis of Ang II (10-8 mol/L) into the myopathic cell reduced gj by 48±4.2%, an effect abolished by losartan (10-8 mol/L). The results indicate that the decline in gj seen in the ventricle of cardiomyopathic hamsters is in part due to activation of the cardiac renin-angiotensin system.


Key Words: cell communication • heart failure, congestive • angiotensin II • enalapril


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
It is well known that a strain of hamsters, the Syrian TO-2 CM hamster (Biobreeders, Fitchburg, Mass), is characterized by several hereditary changes, including ventricular hypertrophy, which precedes ventricular dilation and death by congestive heart failure.1

There is increasing evidence that a local RAS exists in the heart.2 Indeed, renin and angiotensinogen genes are coexpressed in cardiac muscle3 4 5 6 7 ; Ang I is converted to Ang II in isolated and perfused rat heart8 ; and Ang II receptors have been identified in cultured heart myocytes.9 10 Recent studies by Dostal et al11 showed the presence of Ang I, Ang II, and ACE inside isolated heart cells. Studies by Schunkert et al12 in rats with abdominal aortic constriction showed that ACE activity is increased in the left ventricle and that the conversion rate of Ang I to Ang II is significantly enhanced in vitro.

In patients with congestive heart failure as well as in some animal models of heart failure,13 the activities of renin and ACE are not increased during the chronic compensated phase. However, evidence exists that cardiac RAS activity is enhanced in the compensated phase of heart failure when plasma RAS activity is normal.13 Hirsch et al14 described increased ACE activity in the rat model of heart failure as well as augmented expression of the gene coding for ACE in cardiac muscle (see also Reference 1515 ). As previously suggested,16 the induction of cardiac RAS activity during heart failure might have some beneficial effects by promoting local inotropic actions.

Hypertrophied myocytes show several abnormalities of ion pumps, calcium reuptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, hormone receptors, etc.17 In CM hamsters, a calcium overload of the heart cells has been considered an important etiologic factor. Indeed, calcium uptake is increased,18 19 and the duration of the action potential is augmented probably because of increased calcium conductance.20 As discussed by Weismand and Weinfeldt,21 the CM hamster represents an important model for cardiac myopathy and hypertrophy in humans.

It is known that hereditary cardiomyopathy is characterized by changes similar to a calcium-determined necrotic process, showing at the ultrastructural level myocytolysis with typical fibrillar disarray.22 Cardiac myocytes are communicated by hydrophilic channels (gap junctions) that permit the electrical synchronization and flow of chemical messages between cardiac cells.23 Previous studies24 indicated that the RAS plays an important role in the modulation of cell-to-cell communication in normal rat heart. Ang II reduces the gj in isolated cell pairs, whereas enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, increases gj appreciably.

No information is available about whether the process of cardiac failure alters gj or its regulation. In the present work, the role of the RAS on gj control was investigated in the ventricle of CM hamsters.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Male Syrian TO-2 CM hamsters (11 months old) and age-matched healthy male F1B control hamsters were used. Both control and CM rats were kept at the animal house on a normal laboratory animal diet and tap water ad libitum.

Cell pairs were obtained by enzymatic dispersion of hamster ventricle following the method of Powell and Twist25 and Tanigushi et al.26 The heart was removed and immediately perfused with normal Krebs' solution containing (mmol/L) NaCl 136.5, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 0.53, NaH2PO4 0.3, NaHCO3 11.9, glucose 5.5, and HEPES 5, with pH adjusted to 7.3. After 20 minutes, a calcium-free solution containing 0.4% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp) was recirculated through the heart for 1 hour. The collagenase solution was washed out with 100 mL recovery solution containing (mmol/L) taurine 10, oxalic acid 10, glutamic acid 70, KCl 25, KH2PO4 10, glucose 11, and EGTA 0.5, with pH adjusted to 7.4. All solutions were oxygenated with 100% O2.

Ventricles were minced (1 to 2 mm thick slices), and the resulting solution was agitated gently with a Pasteur pipette. The suspension was filtered through a nylon gauze and the filtrate centrifuged 4 minutes at 22g. The cell pellets were then resuspended in normal Krebs' solution. All experiments were conducted at 36°C.

Suction pipettes were pulled from microhematocrit tubing (Clark Electromedical Instruments) by means of a controlled puller (Narishige), and their tips were polished with a microforge (Narishige). The pipettes, which were prepared immediately before the experiment, were filled with the following solution (mmol/L): KCl 125, NaCl 10, MgCl2 3, EGTA 5, and HEPES 10, with pH adjusted to 7.3. The resistance of the filled pipettes (about 2 µm in diameter) varied from 0.5 to 1.5 M{Omega}.

Drugs
Ang I and II were from Sigma Chemical Co; enalapril was from Merck Sharp & Dohme; and losartan was provided by DuPont Laboratories.

Experimental Procedure
All experiments were performed in a small chamber mounted on the stage of an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Diaphot, Nikon). The junctional resistance was determined in cell pairs by two separated voltage-clamp circuits. Gigaohm sealing was achieved in each cell, and then the surface cell membrane of both cells was broken by application of a stronger suction (-30 to -65 cm H2O) and a whole-cell clamp configuration was produced. Each pipette was connected to a separated voltage-clamp amplifier (Dagan Corp) that made possible control of the nonjunctional membrane potential in each cell as well as the voltage gradient across the intercellular junction.

The experimental procedure consisted of holding the membrane potential of both cells at -40 mV. Cell 1 was then pulsed to 0 mV while the membrane potential of cell 2 was unchanged. A voltage was created across the junctional membrane (V1), and a compensating current of opposite polarity recorded from pipette 2 (I2) represented the current flowing through the gap junction. As I2=V1/rj, the junctional resistance (rj) was easily estimated.23 Data acquisition and command potentials were controlled with a software program (PCLAMP, Axon Instruments).

Series resistances (Rs1 and Rs2) located between the input terminal of the head-stage of the amplifiers and the preparation were compensated electronically before the experiment and checked periodically during the experiment. When necessary, gj was corrected, with the changes in series resistance taken into consideration. For this, the following equation was used:

(1)
The change of the patch electrode solution was made with fine polyethylene tubing. About 2 to 3 µL of solution containing the drug was used. In this way, Ang I, Ang II, losartan, enalaprilat, and other compounds were dialyzed into the cell.

Voltage and current signals were displayed simultaneously on an oscilloscope (Tektronix 5113) and chart recorder (Gould 2400).

Statistical Analysis
Data are mean±SE. Statistical significance was determined with Student's t test and defined as a value of P<.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Measurements of gj performed on cell pairs isolated from normal hamsters indicated values ranging from 8 to 200 nS, with most in the range of 40 to 100 nS (Fig 1Down, top). These gj values were much higher (P<.05) than those found in the ventricle of CM hamsters, in which two clearly distinct groups of cells could be identified: one with very low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS) and the other with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS) (Fig 1Down, bottom).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of gj values found in several ventricular cell pairs of normal hamsters (NH, top) and CM hamsters (CH, bottom).

These two major populations of CM myocytes were characterized not only by their different gj values but also by some morphological characteristics. For instance, the group of cells with low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS) presented clear alterations in cross-striations, as previously described (see Reference 2727 ), and the cell pairs with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS) showed an increased cell length (see References 1, 27, and 281 27 28 ). No such morphological differences were found among the myocytes of normal hamsters.

For investigation of the role of the RAS on the control of cell communication in the ventricle of CM hamsters, gj was measured before and after administration of Ang II or enalapril to the bath. In most of these experiments, the gj values remained stable over periods of 20 to 30 minutes; in some experiments, contractures or changes in sealing resistance were found, and the experiment was discarded.

As shown in Fig 2Down, the effect of the peptide varied with the control value of gj. In cell pairs showing low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS), Ang II (1 µg/mL) caused cell uncoupling within 2 minutes, whereas in CM cell pairs with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS), the average decline in gj elicited by Ang II was 53±6.6% (n=18) within 6 to 8 minutes (Fig 2Down). The effect of Ang II on this last group of cell pairs was not statistically different from that seen in normal hamsters (60±6.75%, n=14, P>.05) (Fig 2Down). The series resistance measured at the beginning of the experiments was compensated electronically, and gj values were corrected in two experiments for changes in series resistance by use of Equation 1Up above.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Left, Effect of Ang II (1 µg/mL) on gj recorded from cell pairs of normal hamsters (A) (n=14) and CM cell pairs with very low gj (C) and with higher (7 to 35 nS) gj (B) (n=18). Vertical lines at each point indicate SE. Right, Effect of Ang II (1 µg/mL) on gj recorded from single CM cell pair with low gj (0.8 to 2.5 nS). Ang II was added to the bath at the arrow; b, c, and d indicate 1, 2, and 3 minutes later, respectively. I2 indicates junctional current; V1, transjunctional voltage. Calibration at V1, 40 mV; at I2, 0.06 nA.

The possible influence of changes in surface cell membrane resistance on the interpretation of the results was also investigated. For this, the tm was measured (Fig 3Down). Measurements of tm were made in seven cells before and 7 minutes after administration of Ang II (1 µg/mL) to the bath. The results indicated no significant change in tm after Ang II administration (P>.05). The average value of tm of CM cells at control conditions (20±4 milliseconds, n=8) was not different from the values found after 7 minutes of administration of Ang II (1 µg/mL) (17.8±3.9 milliseconds, n=7, P>.05).



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Electrotonic potential recorded from a single CM heart cell under current-clamp configuration and used for measurement of tm. Current (I) is 10-7 A.

For investigation of whether the effect of the peptide on gj was related to the activation of type 1 (AT1) Ang II receptors, cell pairs were exposed to Ang II (1 µg/mL), and then losartan (10-7 mol/L) was added to the bath containing Ang II. As shown in Fig 4Down, losartan completely reversed the effect of the peptide.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Suppression of the effect of Ang II (1 µg/mL) on gj produced by losartan (10-7 mol/L) added to the bath. Left bar (a), effect of Ang II alone; right bar (b), reversal of Ang II effect by addition of losartan. Each bar is the average of seven experiments. Dot indicates SE.

Further studies on the influence of the RAS on cell communication were made with enalapril, an ACE inhibitor. It was found that the effect of enalapril on gj in CM hamsters varied with the control value of gj. In cell pairs showing low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS), the ACE inhibitor increased gj appreciably (219±20.3%, n=18). The maximal effect of enalapril was seen within about 4 minutes after its administration to the bath, a time probably needed for its conversion to enalaprilat.24 However, in other cell pairs from the same CM preparation but showing higher gj values (7 to 35 nS), the increment of gj caused by the ACE inhibitor was smaller (80±10.8%, n=14). This effect of enalapril was greater than that seen in normal hamsters, in which an increment of gj by 33±5.4% (n=16) was seen. The change in cell coupling of CM cells caused by the ACE inhibitor was not influenced by variations in the surface cell membrane resistance because the tm values recorded at control conditions (18.9±3.8 milliseconds, n=7) and after 4 minutes of drug administration (20.2±4.6 milliseconds, n=5) were not different (P>.05). In addition, changes in series resistance were rare, and when they occurred (in one experiment), the gj values were corrected accordingly (see "Methods").

Is an Intracrine Cardiac RAS Involved in the Control of Cell Coupling in the Failing Heart?
The question of whether the activation of a cardiac RAS in the failing heart is partly responsible for the electrophysiological abnormalities seen in this condition merits serious consideration (see also Reference 2929 ). For investigation of this problem, Ang I (10-8 mol/L) was added to the pipette solution, and the peptide was dialyzed into CM cell pairs. During these experiments, no swelling or contraction of the cells was found. In a few experiments, a slight contracture developed, and the experiment was discarded. The results indicate that the effect of Ang I varies in magnitude with the control value of gj. In cell pairs with low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS), the effect of the peptide was quite strong and cell uncoupling was seen within 2 to 4 minutes (Fig 5Down, left and right), whereas in the group of cell pairs with greater gj values (7 to 35 nS), the dialysis of the same amount of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) caused a decrease in gj of 66±1.7% (n=12) within 9 minutes (Fig 5Down, right). The effect of the peptide on this second group of CM cells was slightly greater than that seen in normal hamster cells, in which gj was reduced by 50±3.2% (n=5, P<.05). In these experiments, the possible influence of variations in dialysis rate was minimized by performing all the experiments with pipettes with the same tip diameter.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Left, Influence of intracellular dialysis of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) on gj recorded from single CM cell pair with low gj. Ang I was added to the pipette solution at the arrow. Cell uncoupling was seen within 3 minutes. V1 and I2 are as defined in Fig 2Up legend. Calibration at V1, 40 mV; I2, 0.05 nA. Right, Average results from eight cell pairs with higher gj (7 to 35 nS) (A) and low gj (0.8 to 2.5 nS) (B). Vertical lines at each point indicate SE.

Although in both normal and CM hamsters the effect of intracellular dialysis of Ang I on gj was reduced by previous administration of enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) to the cytosol (Fig 6Down, left), the effect of enalaprilat was greater in CM cell pairs. In seven CM cell pairs in which enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) was previously dialyzed into the cell for 4 minutes, the addition of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) to the cytosol reduced gj by only 10% to 15% in four experiments and by 8% to 10% in the other three cell pairs (Fig 6Down, left); in normal cell pairs, enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) reduced the effect of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) by 63±4.3% (n=8). In CM cell pairs, the intracellular dialysis of Ang II (10-8 mol/L) also caused a decline in gj of 48±4.2% (n=8) within 2.5 minutes (Fig 6Down, right); in normal hamsters, the reduction of gj was 40±5.6% (n=9) within 7 minutes. Moreover, experiments made on six cell pairs from CM hamsters (gj=0.8 to 2.5 nS) indicated that losartan (10-8 mol/L) administered to the cytosol for 3 minutes before the introduction of Ang II (10-8 mol/L) to the pipette solution suppressed the effect of the peptide on gj (Fig 6Down, right). Similar results were obtained in the controls (not shown).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Left, Influence of enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) on the effect of intracellular administration of Ang I on gj of CM cell pairs. A, Effect of Ang I (10-8 mol/L) alone; B, decrease in effect of Ang I caused by enalaprilat. Each bar is the average of seven cell pairs. Vertical lines at bars indicate SE. Right, Suppression of the effect of intracellular Ang II (10-8 mol/L) administration on gj of CM cell pairs (A) (n=6) by losartan (10-8 mol/L) (a) added to the cytosol. Vertical line indicates SE.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present results indicate that in the ventricle of the CM hamster, there are two major cell populations: one with low gj probably produced by the pathological process, and a second group characterized by higher gj values. The impairment in cell coupling is quite appreciable, particularly in some cell pairs in which extremely low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS) were found. Previous studies by Weingart and Maurer30 in rat ventricular cells indicated that these gj values are incompatible with the propagation of the action potential. This idea is supported by the finding that in some areas of the left ventricular wall, impulse propagation is greatly impaired.29 The low gj might be related to different factors: (1) A high cytosolic calcium concentration (477±10 nmol/L) was found in some areas of the CM hamster heart compared with controls (260±15 nmol/L).27 It is known that an increase in free calcium concentration decreases cell communication.31 The high intracellular free calcium concentration in CM myocytes might be related to alterations in calcium influx or efflux through the sarcolemma and to an impairment in calcium uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. (2) Morphological abnormalities such as significant increases in cell length and width of the cardiocytes were described27 28 and indicate a drastic geometric alteration in the organization of the ventricular muscle, with possible impairment of intercellular communication. (3) Other alternatives include a change in the number or structure of gap junctions in the CM ventricle.

The evidence that ACE activity is enhanced in the myocardium of the CM hamster15 and the present observations that enalapril has an appreciable effect on increasing gj (219%) in the group of CM cells with low gj (compared with 33% in controls) seem to indicate that at least part of the impairment of cell coupling is related to the activation of the cardiac RAS. Although the mechanism by which enalapril increases gj remains to be determined, it is reasonable to think that the ACE inhibitor can enhance cell communication by suppressing Ang II synthesis inside the heart cells. Further support for this view is the great effect of intracellular dialysis of Ang I on gj in CM ventricular cells and its appreciable reduction by previous treatment with enalaprilat. Indeed, the addition of Ang I to the cytosol of cells showing a stronger ACE activity might generate more Ang II, with a consequent decline in gj.32 The fact that no complete suppression of the effect of Ang I was accomplished with enalaprilat is probably related to other pathways of conversion of Ang I to Ang II.33 Of particular interest was the observation that the effect of intracellular administration of Ang II in CM cell pairs was blocked by losartan, an AT1 receptor blocking agent. Because a similar finding was described in isolated cell pairs of rat ventricle,32 it is conceivable that there is a cytosolic "receptor" for Ang II in the heart cell that is similar to AT1 and that its activation is essential for the effect of the peptide on gj. The meaning of this observation, particularly in CM heart cells, is not known. Since Ang II increases the inward calcium current in heart cells,34 the question remains as to whether the excessive buildup of calcium in CM myocytes contributes to the enhanced effect of Ang II in some cell pairs. It is important to emphasize, however, that our present results preclude the influence of changes in intracellular free calcium or intracellular pH on the effect of Ang II on gj because of the concentrations of EGTA (5 mmol/L) or HEPES (10 mmol/L) used in the internal solution.

The improvement of cell-to-cell communication caused by enalapril is an important factor in the avoidance of slow conduction and reentry and consequently cardiac arrhythmias.35 Recent observations performed on isolated ventricular muscle of CM animals indicated that enalapril increases conduction velocity by 36% within 20 minutes.29 The reincorporation of these myocytes into the community of ventricular muscle elicited by enalapril might represent a major event in the improvement of heart function, particularly in the prevention of cardiac arrhythmias.36

Of particular interest is the possible role of an intracrine and paracrine RAS in the failing heart. For instance, an increased synthesis of Ang II inside the myocytes during the process of cardiac failure might be followed by its displacement to the nucleus with consequent increases in protein synthesis or its release into the extracellular space with activation of Ang II receptors located at the sarcolemma of neighboring cells. These events might result in hypertrophy and a decrease in electrical coupling of these cells.13 16 32 37 38 Enalapril would revert these events by suppressing the intracellular synthesis of Ang II.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme
Ang I, II = angiotensin I, II
CM = cardiomyopathic
gj = gap junctional conductance
RAS = renin-angiotensin system
tm = time constant of the cell membrane


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme Laboratories, the American Heart Association, and the National Institutes of Health (HL-34148, RR03051, and 532943). I thank María González for technical help and Lagnny Jacobo for the preparation of this manuscript.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr Walmor C. De Mello, Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, PO Box 365067, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-5067.

Received December 1, 1995; first decision December 29, 1995; accepted February 7, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Bajusz E. Dystrophic calcification of myocardium as conditioning factor in genesis of congestive heart failure: an experimental study. Am Heart J. 1969;78:202-209. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Dzau VJ. Cardiac renin-angiotensin system. Am J Med. 1988;84:22-27. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Field LJ, McGowan RA, Dickinson DP, Gross KW. Tissue and gene specificity of mouse renin expression. Hypertension.. 1984;6:597-603. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Campbell DJ. The site of angiotensin production. J Hypertens.. 1985;3:199-207. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Ohkubo H, Nakayama K, Tamaka T, Nakanishi S. Tissue distribution of rat angiotensinogen mRNA and structural analysis of its heterogeneity. J Biol Chem.. 1986;261:319-373. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Dzau VJ, Ingelfinger J, Pratt RE, Ellison KE. Identification of renin and angiotensinogen RNA sequences in mouse and rat brains. Hypertension.. 1986;8:544-548. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Lindpaintner K, Jin M, Niedermaier N, Wilhelm MJ, Ganten D. Cardiac angiotensinogen and its local activation in the isolated perfused beating heart. Circ Res.. 1990;67:564-573. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Linz W, Scholkens BA, Han JF. Beneficial effects of the converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in ischemic rat heart. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8(suppl 10):S91-S99.

9. Rogers TB, Gaa AH, Allen TS. Identification and characterization of functional angiotensin II receptors on cultured heart myocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1986;36:438-444.

10. Baker KM, Singer HA, Aceto J. Angiotensin II receptor-mediated stimulation of cytosolic free calcium and inositol phosphates in chick myocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1989;251:578-585. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Dostal DC, Rothblum KN, Conrad KM, Cooper GR, Baker KM. Detection of angiotensin I and II in cultured rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Am J Physiol.. 1992;263:C851-C863. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Schunkert A, Dzau J, Tang SS, Hirsch A, Apstein CS, Lorell BH. Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy. J Clin Invest.. 1990;86:1913-1920.

13. Dzau V, Pratt R. Cardiac, vascular and intrarenal renin-angiotensin systems in normal physiology and disease. In: Robertson JI, Nicholls MG, eds. The Renin-Angiotensin System. London, UK: Gower Medical Publishing; 1993;1:42.1-42.11.

14. Hirsch AT, Talsness CE, Schunkert H, Paul M, Dzau V. Tissue specific activation of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme in experimental heart failure. Circ Res. 1991;69:475-482. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Sakata Y. Tissue factors contributing to cardiac hypertrophy in cardiomyopathic hamsters: involvement of transforming-growth factor beta 1 and tissue renin-angiotensin system in the progression of cardiac hypertrophy. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi.. 1993;68:18-28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH. Autocrine-paracrine mechanisms of vascular myocytes in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:99I-103I. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Morgan ME, Baker MM. Cardiac hypertrophy: mechanical, neural and endocrine dependence. Circulation. 1991;83:13-25. [Free Full Text]

18. Lossnitzer K, Janke J, Hein B, Stauch M, Fleckenstein A. Disturbed myocardial calcium metabolism: a possible pathogenic factor in the hereditary cardiomyopathy of the Syrian hamster. In: Fleckenstein A, Rona G, eds. Recent Advances in Studies on Cardiac Metabolism. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press; 1975;6:207-215.

19. Wrogemann K, Nylen EG. Mitochondrial calcium overloading in cardiomyopathic hamsters. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1978;10:185-195. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Rossner K, Sachs HG. Electrophysiological study of Syrian hamster hereditary cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 1978;12:436-443. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Weismand HF, Weinfeldt ML. Toward an understanding of the molecular basis of cardiomyopathies. J Am Cell Cardiol. 1987;10:1135-1138.

22. Jasmin G, Proschek L. Calcium and myocardial cell injury: an appraisal in the cardiomyopathic hamster. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1984;62:891-900. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. De Mello WC. Gap junctional communication in excitable tissues: the heart as a paradigm. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1994;61:1-35. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. De Mello WC, Altieri P. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the control of cell communication in the heart: effects of enalapril and angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol.. 1992;20:643-651. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Powell T, Twist T. A rapid technique for the isolation and purification of adult cardiac muscle cells having respiratory control and a tolerance to calcium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.. 1976;72:327-333. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Tanigushi Y, Kokubun S, Noma A, Irisawa H. Spontaneously active cells isolated from the sinoatrial and atrioventricular node of the rabbit heart. Jpn J Physiol.. 1981;31:547-558. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Sen L, O'Neill M, Marsh JD, Smith TW. Myocyte structure, function and calcium kinetics in the cardiomyopathic hamster heart. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H1533-H1543. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Sorenson ALD, Tepper D, Sonnenblick EH, Robinson TF, Capasso JM. Size and shape of enzymatically isolated ventricular myocytes from rats and cardiomyopathic hamsters. Cardiovasc Res. 1985;19:793-799. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. De Mello WC, Manivannan S. Electrophysiology of the failing heart: effect of enalapril. FASEB J. 1995;9:A604. Abstract.

30. Weingart R, Maurer P. Action potential transfer in cell pairs isolated from adult rat and guinea pig ventricles. Circ Res.. 1988;63:72-80. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. De Mello WC. Effect of intracellular injection of calcium and strontium on cell communication in heart. J Physiol.. 1975;250:231-245. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. De Mello WC. Is an intracellular renin-angiotensin system involved in the control of cell communication in heart? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:640-646. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Urata H, Kinoshita A, Hisono KS, Bumpus FM, Husain A. Identification of a highly specific chymase as the major angiotensin II–forming enzyme in the human heart. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:22348-22357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Dösemeci A, Dhallan RS, Cohen NM, Lederer WJ, Rogers TB. Phorbol ester increases calcium current and simulates the effects of angiotensin II on cultured neonatal rat heart myocytes. Circ Res.. 1988;62:347-357. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Hoffman BF, Rosen M. Cellular mechanisms for cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res.. 1981;49:69-83.

36. De Mello WC. Cell coupling and uncoupling in the heart. In: Rosen M, Janse MJ, Wit A, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology. New York, NY: Futura Press; 1990:427-437.

37. Sheling P, Ganten D, Spek G, Fisher H. Effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin II antagonist saralasin on cell growth and renin in 3T3 and SV3T3 cells. J Cell Physiol. 1979;98:503-514. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Izumo S, Nadal-Girard B, Mahdavi V. Proto-oncogene induction and reprogramming of cardiac gene expression produced by pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85:339-343. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
J. L Zhuo and X. C Li
Review: Novel roles of intracrine angiotensin II and signalling mechanisms in kidney cells
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2007; 8(1): 23 - 33.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
W. C De Mello
Beneficial Effect of Eplerenone on Cardiac Remodelling and Electrical Properties of the Failing Heart
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 40 - 46.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
X. Ai and S. M. Pogwizd
Connexin 43 Downregulation and Dephosphorylation in Nonischemic Heart Failure Is Associated With Enhanced Colocalized Protein Phosphatase Type 2A
Circ. Res., January 7, 2005; 96(1): 54 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
U. Vongvatcharanon, S. Vongvatcharanon, N. Radenahmad, P. Kirirat, P. Intasaro, P. Sobhon, and T. Parker
Angiotensin II may mediate apoptosis via AT1-receptors in the rat cardiac conduction system
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2004; 5(3): 135 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
D. Jin, S. Takai, M. Sakaguchi, Y. Okamoto, M. Muramatsu, and M. Miyazaki
An Antiarrhythmic Effect of a Chymase Inhibitor after Myocardial Infarction
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2004; 309(2): 490 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
C. M Filipeanu, R. H Henning, S A. Nelemans, and D. de Zeeuw
Review: Intracellular angiotensin II: from myth to reality?
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2001; 2(4): 219 - 226.
[PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. A.B. van Veen, H. V.M. van Rijen, and T. Opthof
Cardiac gap junction channels: modulation of expression and channel properties
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2001; 51(2): 217 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. C. De Mello and A. H. J. Danser
Angiotensin II and the Heart : On the Intracrine Renin-Angiotensin System
Hypertension, June 1, 2000; 35(6): 1183 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. H Litchenberg, L. W Norman, A. K Holwell, K. L Martin, K. W Hewett, and R. G Gourdie
The rate and anisotropy of impulse propagation in the postnatal terminal crest are correlated with remodeling of Cx43 gap junction pattern
Cardiovasc Res, January 14, 2000; 45(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. C. De Mello
Gap Junctional Conductance in Cardiomyopathic Hamsters : The Role of c-Src
Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 661 - 662.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. Toyofuku, M. Yabuki, K. Otsu, T. Kuzuya, M. Tada, and M. Hori
Functional Role of c-Src in Gap Junctions of the Cardiomyopathic Heart
Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 672 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
F. Gustafsson and N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou
Angiotensin II modulates conducted vasoconstriction to norepinephrine and local electrical stimulation in rat mesenteric arterioles
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 1999; 44(1): 176 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. J. Lynch Jr., G. L. Stump, A. A. Wallace, C. A. Painter, J. M. Thomas, S. E. Kusma, R. J. Gould, and W. Grossman
EXP3174, the AII antagonist human metabolite of losartan, but not losartan nor the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril, prevents the development of lethal ischemic ventricular arrhythmias in a canine model of recent myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 876 - 884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
W. C. De Mello
Intracellular Angiotensin II Regulates the Inward Calcium Current in Cardiac Myocytes
Hypertension, December 1, 1998; 32(6): 976 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Mello, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Mello, W. C.