(Hypertension. 1996;27:1267-1272.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Departments of Pharmacology and Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cell communication heart failure, congestive angiotensin II enalapril
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is increasing evidence that a local RAS exists in the heart.2 Indeed, renin and angiotensinogen genes are coexpressed in cardiac muscle3 4 5 6 7 ; Ang I is converted to Ang II in isolated and perfused rat heart8 ; and Ang II receptors have been identified in cultured heart myocytes.9 10 Recent studies by Dostal et al11 showed the presence of Ang I, Ang II, and ACE inside isolated heart cells. Studies by Schunkert et al12 in rats with abdominal aortic constriction showed that ACE activity is increased in the left ventricle and that the conversion rate of Ang I to Ang II is significantly enhanced in vitro.
In patients with congestive heart failure as well as in some animal models of heart failure,13 the activities of renin and ACE are not increased during the chronic compensated phase. However, evidence exists that cardiac RAS activity is enhanced in the compensated phase of heart failure when plasma RAS activity is normal.13 Hirsch et al14 described increased ACE activity in the rat model of heart failure as well as augmented expression of the gene coding for ACE in cardiac muscle (see also Reference 1515 ). As previously suggested,16 the induction of cardiac RAS activity during heart failure might have some beneficial effects by promoting local inotropic actions.
Hypertrophied myocytes show several abnormalities of ion pumps, calcium reuptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum, hormone receptors, etc.17 In CM hamsters, a calcium overload of the heart cells has been considered an important etiologic factor. Indeed, calcium uptake is increased,18 19 and the duration of the action potential is augmented probably because of increased calcium conductance.20 As discussed by Weismand and Weinfeldt,21 the CM hamster represents an important model for cardiac myopathy and hypertrophy in humans.
It is known that hereditary cardiomyopathy is characterized by changes similar to a calcium-determined necrotic process, showing at the ultrastructural level myocytolysis with typical fibrillar disarray.22 Cardiac myocytes are communicated by hydrophilic channels (gap junctions) that permit the electrical synchronization and flow of chemical messages between cardiac cells.23 Previous studies24 indicated that the RAS plays an important role in the modulation of cell-to-cell communication in normal rat heart. Ang II reduces the gj in isolated cell pairs, whereas enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, increases gj appreciably.
No information is available about whether the process of cardiac failure alters gj or its regulation. In the present work, the role of the RAS on gj control was investigated in the ventricle of CM hamsters.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell pairs were obtained by enzymatic dispersion of hamster ventricle following the method of Powell and Twist25 and Tanigushi et al.26 The heart was removed and immediately perfused with normal Krebs' solution containing (mmol/L) NaCl 136.5, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 0.53, NaH2PO4 0.3, NaHCO3 11.9, glucose 5.5, and HEPES 5, with pH adjusted to 7.3. After 20 minutes, a calcium-free solution containing 0.4% collagenase (Worthington Biochemical Corp) was recirculated through the heart for 1 hour. The collagenase solution was washed out with 100 mL recovery solution containing (mmol/L) taurine 10, oxalic acid 10, glutamic acid 70, KCl 25, KH2PO4 10, glucose 11, and EGTA 0.5, with pH adjusted to 7.4. All solutions were oxygenated with 100% O2.
Ventricles were minced (1 to 2 mm thick slices), and the resulting solution was agitated gently with a Pasteur pipette. The suspension was filtered through a nylon gauze and the filtrate centrifuged 4 minutes at 22g. The cell pellets were then resuspended in normal Krebs' solution. All experiments were conducted at 36°C.
Suction pipettes were pulled from microhematocrit tubing (Clark
Electromedical Instruments) by means of a controlled puller
(Narishige), and their tips were polished with a microforge
(Narishige). The pipettes, which were prepared immediately before the
experiment, were filled with the following solution (mmol/L): KCl 125,
NaCl 10, MgCl2 3, EGTA 5, and HEPES 10, with pH adjusted to
7.3. The resistance of the filled pipettes (about 2 µm in diameter)
varied from 0.5 to 1.5 M
.
Drugs
Ang I and II were from Sigma Chemical Co; enalapril was from
Merck Sharp & Dohme; and losartan was provided by DuPont
Laboratories.
Experimental Procedure
All experiments were performed in a small chamber mounted on the
stage of an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Diaphot, Nikon).
The junctional resistance was determined in cell pairs by two separated
voltage-clamp circuits. Gigaohm sealing was achieved in each cell,
and then the surface cell membrane of both cells was broken by
application of a stronger suction (-30 to -65 cm
H2O) and a whole-cell clamp configuration was produced.
Each pipette was connected to a separated voltage-clamp amplifier
(Dagan Corp) that made possible control of the nonjunctional membrane
potential in each cell as well as the voltage gradient across the
intercellular junction.
The experimental procedure consisted of holding the membrane potential of both cells at -40 mV. Cell 1 was then pulsed to 0 mV while the membrane potential of cell 2 was unchanged. A voltage was created across the junctional membrane (V1), and a compensating current of opposite polarity recorded from pipette 2 (I2) represented the current flowing through the gap junction. As I2=V1/rj, the junctional resistance (rj) was easily estimated.23 Data acquisition and command potentials were controlled with a software program (PCLAMP, Axon Instruments).
Series resistances (Rs1 and Rs2) located
between the input terminal of the head-stage of the amplifiers and
the preparation were compensated electronically before the experiment
and checked periodically during the experiment. When necessary, gj was
corrected, with the changes in series resistance taken into
consideration. For this, the following equation was used:
![]() | (1) |
Voltage and current signals were displayed simultaneously on an oscilloscope (Tektronix 5113) and chart recorder (Gould 2400).
Statistical Analysis
Data are mean±SE. Statistical significance was determined with
Student's t test and defined as a value of
P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
These two major populations of CM myocytes were characterized not only by their different gj values but also by some morphological characteristics. For instance, the group of cells with low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS) presented clear alterations in cross-striations, as previously described (see Reference 2727 ), and the cell pairs with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS) showed an increased cell length (see References 1, 27, and 281 27 28 ). No such morphological differences were found among the myocytes of normal hamsters.
For investigation of the role of the RAS on the control of cell communication in the ventricle of CM hamsters, gj was measured before and after administration of Ang II or enalapril to the bath. In most of these experiments, the gj values remained stable over periods of 20 to 30 minutes; in some experiments, contractures or changes in sealing resistance were found, and the experiment was discarded.
As shown in Fig 2
, the effect of the peptide varied with
the control value of gj. In cell pairs showing low gj values (0.8 to
2.5 nS), Ang II (1 µg/mL) caused cell uncoupling within 2 minutes,
whereas in CM cell pairs with higher gj values (7 to 35 nS), the
average decline in gj elicited by Ang II was 53±6.6% (n=18) within 6
to 8 minutes (Fig 2
). The effect of Ang II on this last group of cell
pairs was not statistically different from that seen in normal hamsters
(60±6.75%, n=14, P>.05) (Fig 2
). The series resistance
measured at the beginning of the experiments was compensated
electronically, and gj values were corrected in two experiments for
changes in series resistance by use of Equation 1
above.
|
The possible influence of changes in surface cell membrane resistance
on the interpretation of the results was also investigated. For this,
the tm was measured (Fig 3
). Measurements of tm were
made in seven cells before and 7 minutes after administration of Ang II
(1 µg/mL) to the bath. The results indicated no significant change in
tm after Ang II administration (P>.05). The average value
of tm of CM cells at control conditions (20±4 milliseconds, n=8) was
not different from the values found after 7 minutes of administration
of Ang II (1 µg/mL) (17.8±3.9 milliseconds, n=7,
P>.05).
|
For investigation of whether the effect of the peptide on gj was
related to the activation of type 1 (AT1) Ang II receptors,
cell pairs were exposed to Ang II (1 µg/mL), and then
losartan (10-7 mol/L) was added
to the bath containing Ang II. As shown in Fig 4
,
losartan completely reversed the effect of the peptide.
|
Further studies on the influence of the RAS on cell communication were made with enalapril, an ACE inhibitor. It was found that the effect of enalapril on gj in CM hamsters varied with the control value of gj. In cell pairs showing low gj values (0.8 to 2.5 nS), the ACE inhibitor increased gj appreciably (219±20.3%, n=18). The maximal effect of enalapril was seen within about 4 minutes after its administration to the bath, a time probably needed for its conversion to enalaprilat.24 However, in other cell pairs from the same CM preparation but showing higher gj values (7 to 35 nS), the increment of gj caused by the ACE inhibitor was smaller (80±10.8%, n=14). This effect of enalapril was greater than that seen in normal hamsters, in which an increment of gj by 33±5.4% (n=16) was seen. The change in cell coupling of CM cells caused by the ACE inhibitor was not influenced by variations in the surface cell membrane resistance because the tm values recorded at control conditions (18.9±3.8 milliseconds, n=7) and after 4 minutes of drug administration (20.2±4.6 milliseconds, n=5) were not different (P>.05). In addition, changes in series resistance were rare, and when they occurred (in one experiment), the gj values were corrected accordingly (see "Methods").
Is an Intracrine Cardiac RAS Involved in the Control of Cell
Coupling in the Failing Heart?
The question of whether the activation of a cardiac RAS in the
failing heart is partly responsible for the
electrophysiological abnormalities seen in
this condition merits serious consideration (see also Reference 2929 ).
For investigation of this problem, Ang I
(10-8 mol/L) was added to the pipette
solution, and the peptide was dialyzed into CM cell pairs. During these
experiments, no swelling or contraction of the cells was found. In a
few experiments, a slight contracture developed, and the experiment was
discarded. The results indicate that the effect of Ang I varies in
magnitude with the control value of gj. In cell pairs with low gj
values (0.8 to 2.5 nS), the effect of the peptide was quite strong and
cell uncoupling was seen within 2 to 4 minutes (Fig 5
, left and
right), whereas in the group of cell pairs with greater
gj values (7 to 35 nS), the dialysis of the same amount of Ang I
(10-8 mol/L) caused a decrease in gj of
66±1.7% (n=12) within 9 minutes (Fig 5
, right). The effect of the
peptide on this second group of CM cells was slightly greater than that
seen in normal hamster cells, in which gj was reduced by 50±3.2%
(n=5, P<.05). In these experiments, the possible influence
of variations in dialysis rate was minimized by performing all the
experiments with pipettes with the same tip diameter.
|
Although in both normal and CM hamsters the effect of intracellular
dialysis of Ang I on gj was reduced by previous administration of
enalaprilat (10-9 mol/L) to the cytosol
(Fig 6
, left), the effect of enalaprilat was greater in
CM cell pairs. In seven CM cell pairs in which enalaprilat
(10-9 mol/L) was previously dialyzed into
the cell for 4 minutes, the addition of Ang I
(10-8 mol/L) to the cytosol reduced gj by
only 10% to 15% in four experiments and by 8% to 10% in the other
three cell pairs (Fig 6
, left); in normal cell pairs, enalaprilat
(10-9 mol/L) reduced the effect of Ang I
(10-8 mol/L) by 63±4.3% (n=8). In CM
cell pairs, the intracellular dialysis of Ang II
(10-8 mol/L) also caused a decline in gj
of 48±4.2% (n=8) within 2.5 minutes (Fig 6
, right); in normal
hamsters, the reduction of gj was 40±5.6% (n=9) within 7 minutes.
Moreover, experiments made on six cell pairs from CM hamsters (gj=0.8
to 2.5 nS) indicated that losartan
(10-8 mol/L) administered to the cytosol
for 3 minutes before the introduction of Ang II
(10-8 mol/L) to the pipette solution
suppressed the effect of the peptide on gj (Fig 6
, right). Similar
results were obtained in the controls (not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The evidence that ACE activity is enhanced in the myocardium of the CM hamster15 and the present observations that enalapril has an appreciable effect on increasing gj (219%) in the group of CM cells with low gj (compared with 33% in controls) seem to indicate that at least part of the impairment of cell coupling is related to the activation of the cardiac RAS. Although the mechanism by which enalapril increases gj remains to be determined, it is reasonable to think that the ACE inhibitor can enhance cell communication by suppressing Ang II synthesis inside the heart cells. Further support for this view is the great effect of intracellular dialysis of Ang I on gj in CM ventricular cells and its appreciable reduction by previous treatment with enalaprilat. Indeed, the addition of Ang I to the cytosol of cells showing a stronger ACE activity might generate more Ang II, with a consequent decline in gj.32 The fact that no complete suppression of the effect of Ang I was accomplished with enalaprilat is probably related to other pathways of conversion of Ang I to Ang II.33 Of particular interest was the observation that the effect of intracellular administration of Ang II in CM cell pairs was blocked by losartan, an AT1 receptor blocking agent. Because a similar finding was described in isolated cell pairs of rat ventricle,32 it is conceivable that there is a cytosolic "receptor" for Ang II in the heart cell that is similar to AT1 and that its activation is essential for the effect of the peptide on gj. The meaning of this observation, particularly in CM heart cells, is not known. Since Ang II increases the inward calcium current in heart cells,34 the question remains as to whether the excessive buildup of calcium in CM myocytes contributes to the enhanced effect of Ang II in some cell pairs. It is important to emphasize, however, that our present results preclude the influence of changes in intracellular free calcium or intracellular pH on the effect of Ang II on gj because of the concentrations of EGTA (5 mmol/L) or HEPES (10 mmol/L) used in the internal solution.
The improvement of cell-to-cell communication caused by enalapril is an important factor in the avoidance of slow conduction and reentry and consequently cardiac arrhythmias.35 Recent observations performed on isolated ventricular muscle of CM animals indicated that enalapril increases conduction velocity by 36% within 20 minutes.29 The reincorporation of these myocytes into the community of ventricular muscle elicited by enalapril might represent a major event in the improvement of heart function, particularly in the prevention of cardiac arrhythmias.36
Of particular interest is the possible role of an intracrine and paracrine RAS in the failing heart. For instance, an increased synthesis of Ang II inside the myocytes during the process of cardiac failure might be followed by its displacement to the nucleus with consequent increases in protein synthesis or its release into the extracellular space with activation of Ang II receptors located at the sarcolemma of neighboring cells. These events might result in hypertrophy and a decrease in electrical coupling of these cells.13 16 32 37 38 Enalapril would revert these events by suppressing the intracellular synthesis of Ang II.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 1, 1995; first decision December 29, 1995; accepted February 7, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dzau VJ. Cardiac renin-angiotensin system. Am J Med. 1988;84:22-27. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Field LJ, McGowan RA, Dickinson DP, Gross KW.
Tissue and gene specificity of mouse renin expression.
Hypertension.. 1984;6:597-603.
4. Campbell DJ. The site of angiotensin production. J Hypertens.. 1985;3:199-207. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ohkubo H, Nakayama K, Tamaka T, Nakanishi S.
Tissue distribution of rat angiotensinogen mRNA and
structural analysis of its
heterogeneity. J Biol
Chem.. 1986;261:319-373.
6.
Dzau VJ, Ingelfinger J, Pratt RE, Ellison KE.
Identification of renin and angiotensinogen RNA sequences
in mouse and rat brains. Hypertension.. 1986;8:544-548.
7.
Lindpaintner K, Jin M, Niedermaier N, Wilhelm MJ,
Ganten D. Cardiac angiotensinogen and its local
activation in the isolated perfused beating heart. Circ
Res.. 1990;67:564-573.
8. Linz W, Scholkens BA, Han JF. Beneficial effects of the converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in ischemic rat heart. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8(suppl 10):S91-S99.
9. Rogers TB, Gaa AH, Allen TS. Identification and characterization of functional angiotensin II receptors on cultured heart myocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1986;36:438-444.
10.
Baker KM, Singer HA, Aceto J.
Angiotensin II receptor-mediated stimulation of
cytosolic free calcium and inositol phosphates in chick
myocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1989;251:578-585.
11.
Dostal DC, Rothblum KN, Conrad KM, Cooper GR, Baker
KM. Detection of angiotensin I and II in cultured
rat cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts. Am J Physiol.. 1992;263:C851-C863.
12. Schunkert A, Dzau J, Tang SS, Hirsch A, Apstein CS, Lorell BH. Increased rat cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme activity mRNA expression in pressure overload left ventricular hypertrophy. J Clin Invest.. 1990;86:1913-1920.
13. Dzau V, Pratt R. Cardiac, vascular and intrarenal renin-angiotensin systems in normal physiology and disease. In: Robertson JI, Nicholls MG, eds. The Renin-Angiotensin System. London, UK: Gower Medical Publishing; 1993;1:42.1-42.11.
14.
Hirsch AT, Talsness CE, Schunkert H, Paul M, Dzau
V. Tissue specific activation of cardiac angiotensin
converting enzyme in experimental heart failure.
Circ Res. 1991;69:475-482.
15. Sakata Y. Tissue factors contributing to cardiac hypertrophy in cardiomyopathic hamsters: involvement of transforming-growth factor beta 1 and tissue renin-angiotensin system in the progression of cardiac hypertrophy. Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi.. 1993;68:18-28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH. Autocrine-paracrine mechanisms of vascular myocytes in systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:99I-103I. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Morgan ME, Baker MM. Cardiac
hypertrophy: mechanical, neural and endocrine
dependence. Circulation. 1991;83:13-25.
18. Lossnitzer K, Janke J, Hein B, Stauch M, Fleckenstein A. Disturbed myocardial calcium metabolism: a possible pathogenic factor in the hereditary cardiomyopathy of the Syrian hamster. In: Fleckenstein A, Rona G, eds. Recent Advances in Studies on Cardiac Metabolism. Baltimore, Md: University Park Press; 1975;6:207-215.
19. Wrogemann K, Nylen EG. Mitochondrial calcium overloading in cardiomyopathic hamsters. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1978;10:185-195. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Rossner K, Sachs HG. Electrophysiological study of Syrian hamster hereditary cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res. 1978;12:436-443. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Weismand HF, Weinfeldt ML. Toward an understanding of the molecular basis of cardiomyopathies. J Am Cell Cardiol. 1987;10:1135-1138.
22. Jasmin G, Proschek L. Calcium and myocardial cell injury: an appraisal in the cardiomyopathic hamster. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1984;62:891-900. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. De Mello WC. Gap junctional communication in excitable tissues: the heart as a paradigm. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1994;61:1-35. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. De Mello WC, Altieri P. The role of the renin-angiotensin system in the control of cell communication in the heart: effects of enalapril and angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol.. 1992;20:643-651. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Powell T, Twist T. A rapid technique for the isolation and purification of adult cardiac muscle cells having respiratory control and a tolerance to calcium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.. 1976;72:327-333. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Tanigushi Y, Kokubun S, Noma A, Irisawa H. Spontaneously active cells isolated from the sinoatrial and atrioventricular node of the rabbit heart. Jpn J Physiol.. 1981;31:547-558. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Sen L, O'Neill M, Marsh JD, Smith TW. Myocyte
structure, function and calcium kinetics in the
cardiomyopathic hamster heart. Am J
Physiol. 1990;259:H1533-H1543.
28. Sorenson ALD, Tepper D, Sonnenblick EH, Robinson TF, Capasso JM. Size and shape of enzymatically isolated ventricular myocytes from rats and cardiomyopathic hamsters. Cardiovasc Res. 1985;19:793-799. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. De Mello WC, Manivannan S. Electrophysiology of the failing heart: effect of enalapril. FASEB J. 1995;9:A604. Abstract.
30.
Weingart R, Maurer P. Action potential transfer
in cell pairs isolated from adult rat and guinea pig
ventricles. Circ Res.. 1988;63:72-80.
31.
De Mello WC. Effect of intracellular injection
of calcium and strontium on cell communication in heart.
J Physiol.. 1975;250:231-245.
32. De Mello WC. Is an intracellular renin-angiotensin system involved in the control of cell communication in heart? J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;23:640-646. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Urata H, Kinoshita A, Hisono KS, Bumpus FM, Husain
A. Identification of a highly specific chymase as the major
angiotensin IIforming enzyme in the human heart.
J Biol Chem. 1990;265:22348-22357.
34.
Dösemeci A, Dhallan RS, Cohen NM, Lederer WJ,
Rogers TB. Phorbol ester increases calcium current and simulates
the effects of angiotensin II on cultured neonatal rat
heart myocytes. Circ Res.. 1988;62:347-357.
35. Hoffman BF, Rosen M. Cellular mechanisms for cardiac arrhythmias. Circ Res.. 1981;49:69-83.
36. De Mello WC. Cell coupling and uncoupling in the heart. In: Rosen M, Janse MJ, Wit A, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology. New York, NY: Futura Press; 1990:427-437.
37. Sheling P, Ganten D, Spek G, Fisher H. Effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin II antagonist saralasin on cell growth and renin in 3T3 and SV3T3 cells. J Cell Physiol. 1979;98:503-514. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Izumo S, Nadal-Girard B, Mahdavi V.
Proto-oncogene induction and reprogramming of cardiac gene
expression produced by pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA. 1988;85:339-343.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L Zhuo and X. C Li Review: Novel roles of intracrine angiotensin II and signalling mechanisms in kidney cells Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2007; 8(1): 23 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C De Mello Beneficial Effect of Eplerenone on Cardiac Remodelling and Electrical Properties of the Failing Heart Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 40 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Ai and S. M. Pogwizd Connexin 43 Downregulation and Dephosphorylation in Nonischemic Heart Failure Is Associated With Enhanced Colocalized Protein Phosphatase Type 2A Circ. Res., January 7, 2005; 96(1): 54 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Vongvatcharanon, S. Vongvatcharanon, N. Radenahmad, P. Kirirat, P. Intasaro, P. Sobhon, and T. Parker Angiotensin II may mediate apoptosis via AT1-receptors in the rat cardiac conduction system Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2004; 5(3): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Jin, S. Takai, M. Sakaguchi, Y. Okamoto, M. Muramatsu, and M. Miyazaki An Antiarrhythmic Effect of a Chymase Inhibitor after Myocardial Infarction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2004; 309(2): 490 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M Filipeanu, R. H Henning, S A. Nelemans, and D. de Zeeuw Review: Intracellular angiotensin II: from myth to reality? Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2001; 2(4): 219 - 226. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A.B. van Veen, H. V.M. van Rijen, and T. Opthof Cardiac gap junction channels: modulation of expression and channel properties Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2001; 51(2): 217 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. De Mello and A. H. J. Danser Angiotensin II and the Heart : On the Intracrine Renin-Angiotensin System Hypertension, June 1, 2000; 35(6): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H Litchenberg, L. W Norman, A. K Holwell, K. L Martin, K. W Hewett, and R. G Gourdie The rate and anisotropy of impulse propagation in the postnatal terminal crest are correlated with remodeling of Cx43 gap junction pattern Cardiovasc Res, January 14, 2000; 45(2): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. De Mello Gap Junctional Conductance in Cardiomyopathic Hamsters : The Role of c-Src Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 661 - 662. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Toyofuku, M. Yabuki, K. Otsu, T. Kuzuya, M. Tada, and M. Hori Functional Role of c-Src in Gap Junctions of the Cardiomyopathic Heart Circ. Res., October 15, 1999; 85(8): 672 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Gustafsson and N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou Angiotensin II modulates conducted vasoconstriction to norepinephrine and local electrical stimulation in rat mesenteric arterioles Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 1999; 44(1): 176 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Lynch Jr., G. L. Stump, A. A. Wallace, C. A. Painter, J. M. Thomas, S. E. Kusma, R. J. Gould, and W. Grossman EXP3174, the AII antagonist human metabolite of losartan, but not losartan nor the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril, prevents the development of lethal ischemic ventricular arrhythmias in a canine model of recent myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 876 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. De Mello Intracellular Angiotensin II Regulates the Inward Calcium Current in Cardiac Myocytes Hypertension, December 1, 1998; 32(6): 976 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |