(Hypertension. 1996;28:37-41.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Division of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, and the Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hemodynamics obesity ethnic groups adolescents cardiac output heart rate vascular resistance
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our purpose in this study was to investigate the relative role of lean body mass and fat mass in determining stroke volume, heart rate, and total peripheral vascular resistance in children and adolescents. In addition, we evaluated whether race and sex were significant correlates of the hemodynamic determinants of BP after controlling for the effects of lean body mass and fat mass.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Measurements
Anthropometric Measurements
The examination included measurement of height and weight. Body surface area was calculated from height and weight. Lean body mass and fat mass were determined with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). This method uses two low-energy x-ray beams that traverse the body. The resultant energy collected by the external detector has been attenuated by the body tissue through which it has passed. The number of photons per unit area is corrected for soft tissue by a linear two-dimensional interpolation. The corrected values are then summed for determination of the bone mineral content. Soft tissue is resolved by mass attenuation coefficients derived from tissue equivalent standards for fat-free and fat tissue. DEXA has been shown to provide accurate and precise measurements of bone mineral content, fat-free mass, and total body fat.4 5 6 7 8 DEXA has been validated against the hydrodensitometry method, which has previously been established as the most reliable and valid method for measurement of lean body mass, but it is cumbersome to use.8 In this study, subjects were scanned with a Hologic (QDR-1000/W) whole-body scanner. Body composition was divided into bone mass and soft tissue mass, which was then divided into lean body mass and fat mass.
Blood Pressure
The staff received a standard 16-hour BP measurement training course and were certified according to a previously established protocol.9 BP was measured with the subject seated quietly with the use of auscultation and a mercury sphygmomanometer according to the methods set forth by the Second National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children.10 Three BP measurements were taken in the right arm with an appropriately sized cuff. The onset of the fifth Korotkoff phase was used for determination of DBP. The average of the three measurements was used in the analysis. Mean BP was calculated with the equation Mean BP=DBP+1/3(SBP-DBP). Heart rate was obtained by palpation of the brachial pulse over 30 seconds with the subject seated.
Echocardiography
Echocardiographic examination was performed with standard techniques and the subjects in the supine position. Studies were performed with two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiograms. Measurements were made according to the American Society of Echocardiography.11
Stroke Volume
Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were calculated from M-mode measurements according to the cube formula reported by Meyer et al.12 Stroke volume was determined with this approach, which has been shown to correlate well with invasive and two-dimensional echocardiographic volume measurements.13 14
Cardiac Output
Cardiac output was calculated from stroke volume and heart rate. This method has been shown to correlate well with invasive dye dilution and Doppler methods of cardiac output determination.14 15
Total Peripheral Vascular Resistance
The concurrent determination of cardiac output and mean BP allows the derivation of systemic vascular resistance to blood flow.16 Total peripheral vascular resistance is calculated by the equation TPR (dyne·sxcm-5)=(MBP/CO)x80, where TPR is total peripheral vascular resistance, MBP is mean BP, and CO is cardiac output.
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics are presented with mean±SD for continuous variables. Differences in hemodynamic variables by sex and race were determined by Student's t test for independent samples. Bivariate associations between anthropometric and hemodynamic variables were assessed with Pearson correlation coefficients. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used for evaluation of the independent correlates of the hemodynamic variables. Dummy variables were constructed for sex and race for determination of whether these variables were significant independent correlates of the hemodynamic variables. Independent variables were allowed in the model if their regression coefficients were significantly different from zero. Partial R2 coefficients were used for determination of the relative proportion of the variance of the dependent variable that was explained by each of the independent variables included in the multiple regression model. A two-tailed value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant. Further evaluation included analysis of residuals for determination of whether there were any undetected trends with age.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
SBP and DBP were compared by sex and race. It was found that SBP was significantly higher in boys than girls (110.0±12.7 versus 106.0±10.7 mm Hg, P=.02), but there was no significant difference in DBP by sex. Black subjects had significantly higher DBP than white subjects (70.7±12.3 versus 67.2±9.8 mm Hg, P=.03). However, there was no significant difference in SBP by race. The sex and race differences in cardiac output, stroke volume, heart rate, and total peripheral vascular resistance are presented in Table 2
.
|
Bivariate correlation coefficients for the relationships between body size variables and hemodynamic variables are presented in Table 3
. These correlations demonstrated that SBP, DBP, cardiac output, and stroke volume were all directly associated with measures of body size. The strongest correlates were lean body mass and body surface area, whereas fat mass consistently had the weakest association. In contrast, heart rate and total peripheral vascular resistance were inversely associated with measures of body size. Again, fat mass had the weakest association with heart rate and total peripheral resistance, and the correlation coefficient for the relationship between fat mass and heart rate was not statistically significant.
|
The results of multiple regression analyses are presented in Table 4
. These results indicated that lean body mass was the sole significant determinant of SBP, whereas sex was also included with lean body mass in the regression model to explain the variance of DBP. Lean body mass was also an independent direct determinant of stroke volume, cardiac output, SBP, and DBP. Lean body mass was an independent inverse determinant of total peripheral vascular resistance.
|
Fat mass was a significant independent direct correlate of stroke volume and cardiac output and a significant independent inverse correlate of peripheral vascular resistance. Sex was also a significant correlate of stroke volume and cardiac output and an inverse correlate of total peripheral resistance after lean body mass and fat mass were included in the model. These results indicated that after body size was controlled, males had higher stroke volume than females, whereas females had higher total peripheral vascular resistance than males. Race had a significant direct association with cardiac output and heart rate but a significant inverse relationship with total peripheral resistance after the effects of body size were taken into account. These results indicated that after body size was controlled, white subjects had higher heart rate and cardiac output than black subjects, but blacks had higher total peripheral vascular resistance than whites. Examination of residuals plotted against age and ANCOVA indicated that the sex differences seen were consistent over the entire age range studied, and there were no trends with age for the hemodynamic factors investigated after the variables included in the regression analysis had been taken into account.
These results demonstrated that lean body mass was the strongest correlate of all of the hemodynamic variables studied except heart rate. This underscores why lean body mass is such an important determinant of SBP and DBP. Height was the strongest determinant of heart rate, but the multiple regression model including height and race was only able to explain 11% of the variance of heart rate. This indicates that other factors not included in this analysis are likely to be important determinants of heart rate.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The relationship of lean body mass and fat mass to the determinants of BP, stroke volume, heart rate, and total peripheral vascular resistance have also not been well studied, particularly in children and adolescents. Previous investigations have shown a direct relationship between obesity and cardiac output.18 19 20 However, these studies have usually used body mass index as the measure of obesity. Body mass index includes elements of both fat mass and lean body mass. The present analysis demonstrates that lean body mass and fat mass are both significant correlates of cardiac output. However, lean body mass explains a much larger proportion of the variance (33% versus 3%) of cardiac output than fat mass. This result is probably explained by the fact that fat mass is a tissue with much lower metabolic demand than lean body mass.21 Cardiac output is likely to be regulated by the body's metabolic demand, which is largely determined by lean body mass. The development of obesity may involve increases in both fat mass and lean body mass.22 23 The increase in lean body mass observed with obesity may occur in part to support the increasing fat mass. In this cross-sectional study, it was not possible to partition the true lean body mass from lean mass that may be associated with fat tissue. Longitudinal studies will be needed to delineate these relationships.
As might be expected from the relationships with cardiac output, lean body mass and fat mass are also significant independent correlates of stroke volume, with lean body mass explaining 49% and fat mass 2% of the variance of stroke volume in the multiple regression model. Sex is also a significant independent correlate of stroke volume after lean body and fat mass have been included in the regression model. This indicates that sex differences other than body size have a relationship with stroke volume. This is different from the evaluation of left ventricular mass, in which body size differences between males and females do appear to account for the observed differences in left ventricular mass by sex.24 25 Thus, the mechanisms of the sex difference in stroke volume remain unexplained.
Although the variables included in the multiple regression analysis could explain 52% of the variance of stroke volume, only 11% of the variance in heart rate could be explained. Height was inversely associated with heart rate. This finding is consistent with the known decline in resting heart rate with increasing age over the age range included in this investigation.26 Race is also a significant correlate of heart rate in the present study. This is consistent with the results of previous studies, including the second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II) and the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, which showed that young white subjects have higher heart rates than do young black subjects.27 28 This ethnic difference in heart rate has been previously shown to be largest for children, it remains significant but decreases for young adults, and eventually disappears in middle age. The lack of a relationship of fat mass with heart rate in the present study is also consistent with the CARDIA study, which found no relationship between body mass index and heart rate in adults.27
The other major determinant of BP is total peripheral vascular resistance. Both lean body mass and fat mass are significant correlates of vascular resistance; however, they are inversely related. These results indicate that increased lean body mass and increased fat mass are associated with decreased total peripheral vascular resistance. In the present study, race and sex are also independently associated with total peripheral resistance after control for body size. The observed influence of race on vascular resistance is consistent with several previous studies. Arensman et al29 demonstrated that 10-year-old black male subjects had higher systemic vascular resistance both at rest and during exercise than white subjects. In the Bogalusa study, Soto et al30 also found that black males aged 7 to 22 years had higher resistance than white subjects. Dysart et al31 showed that there were ethnic differences in total peripheral vascular resistance in girls with a family history of hypertension that were independent of age, height, weight, and body mass index.
In the present study, lean body mass and fat mass were both found to be significant correlates of stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral vascular resistance. However, the direction of the effect of lean body mass and fat mass was opposite for stroke volume and cardiac output compared with that for total peripheral vascular resistance. This indicates that increased lean body mass and fat mass tend to raise BP by increasing cardiac output but also may tend to lower BP by decreasing vascular resistance. The regression coefficient for lean body mass was positive in the regression models for SBP and DBP. This suggests that the relationship of lean body mass to cardiac output may have a greater overall influence on BP level than the relationship of lean body mass to vascular resistance. In addition, race and sex were both significant independent determinants of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance after the effects of body size were accounted for. White and male subjects tended to have higher cardiac output, whereas black and female subjects tended to have higher total peripheral vascular resistance. Similar findings in previous investigations led Falkner32 to suggest that the racial difference in the resistance component of BP may be contributing to BP elevation at an earlier age in blacks. The results of the present study demonstrate that race, sex, lean body mass, and fat mass are all independently related to the hemodynamic parameters that determine BP and that lean body mass is a more important determinant of the hemodynamic variables than fat mass in normal children and adolescents. Further longitudinal studies that focus on changes in lean body mass, fat mass, and hemodynamic variables will be necessary for evaluation of these interrelationships and understanding of the genesis of BP elevation more completely.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received December 21, 1995;
first decision January 23, 1996; first decision March 11, 1996;
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gillum RF, Prineas RJ, Horibe H. Maturation vs age: assessing blood pressure by height. J Natl Med Assoc. 1982;74:43-46.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Rosner B, Prineas RJ, Loggie JMH, Daniels SR. Blood pressure nomograms for children and adolescents, by height, sex and age, in the United States. J Pediatr. 1993;123:871-886.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Frohlich ED, Messerli FH, Reisin E, Dunn FG. The problem of obesity and hypertension. Hypertension. 1983;5(suppl III):III-71-III-78.
5. Morrison JA, Khoury PR, Chumlea WC, Specker B, Campaigne BN, Guo SS. Body composition measures from underwater weighing and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in black and white girls: a comparative study. Am J Hum Biol. 1994;6:482-490.
6. Lohman TG. Advances in Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics Publishers; 1992.
7. Chan G. Performance of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in evaluating bone, lean body mass and fat in pediatric subjects. J Bone Miner Res. 1992;7:369-374.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Jensen MD, Kunsley JA, Roust IR, O'Brien PC, Braun JS, Dun WI, Wahner WH. Assessment of body composition with use of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry evaluation and comparison with other methods. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68:867-873.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study Research Group. Obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in black and white girls: the NHLBI Growth and Health Study. Am J Pub Health. 1992;82:1613-1620.
10.
Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. Report of the Second Task Force on Blood Pressure Control in Children. Pediatrics. 1987;79:1-25.
11.
Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. The Committee on M-Mode Standardization of the American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography. Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation. 1978;58:1072-1083.
12.
Meyer RA, Stockert J, Kaplan S. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular volume in pediatric patients. Circulation. 1975;51:297-303.
13. Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R. Problems in echo-cardiographic volume determination: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence or absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol. 1976;37:7-12.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Kronik G, Glany J, Mosslacher H. Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume: a correlative study with thermodiluted left ventricular single plane cineangiography. Circulation. 1979;60:1308-1316.
15. Wallerson DC, Ganau A, Roman MJ, Devereux RB. Measurement of cardiac output by M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography: application to patients with hypertension. Eur Heart J. 1990;11(suppl 1):67-78.
16.
Lutas EM, Devereux RB, Reis G, Alderman MH, Pickering TG, Borer JS, Laragh JH. Increased cardiac performance with mild essential hypertension: left ventricular mechanics. Hypertension. 1985;7:979-988.
17. Alexander JK. Obesity and the cardiovascular system. Primary Cardiology. 1990;16:43-54.
18.
Hall JE. Renal and cardiovascular mechanisms of hypertension in obesity. Hypertension. 1994;23:381-394.
19. Dustan HP. Mechanism of hypertension associated with obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:860-864.
20.
Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Reisin E, Dreslinski GR, Dunn FG, MacPhee AA, Frohlich ED. Borderline hypertension and obesity: two prehypertensive states with elevated cardiac output. Circulation. 1982;66:55-60.
21. Crandall DL, DiGirolamo M. Hemodynamic and metabolic correlates in adipose tissue: pathophysiologic considerations. FASEB J. 1990;4:141-147.[Abstract]
22. Dietz WH, Schoeller DA. Optimum dietary therapy for obese adolescents: comparisons of protein plus glucose and protein plus fat. J Pediatr. 1982;100:638-644.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Weinsier RL, Norris DJ, Birch R, Bernstein RS, Wang J, Yang M-U, Pierson RN Jr, Van Itallie TB. The relative contribution of body fat and fat pattern to blood pressure level. Hypertension. 1985;7:578-585.
24. de Simone G, Daniels SR, Devereux RB, Meyer RA, Roman MJ, de Divitiis O, Alderman MH. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1251-1260.[Abstract]
25. de Simone G, Devereux RB, Daniels SR, Meyer RA. Gender differences in cardiac growth. Hypertension. 1995;26(part 1):979-983.
26. Davignon A, Rautaharju P, Burselle E, Soumis F, Megelas M. Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol. 1979/80;1:133-152.
27.
Persky VW, Dyer AR, Stamler J, Shekelle RB, Schoenberger FA. Racial patterns of heart rate in an employed adult population. Am J Epidemiol. 1979;110:274-279.
28. Liu K, Ballew C, Jacobs DR, Sidney S, Savage PJ, Dyer A, Hughes G, Blanton MM, CARDIA Study Group. Ethnic differences in blood pressure, pulse rate, and related characteristics in young adults: the CARDIA Study. Hypertension. 1987;14:218-226.[Abstract]
29.
Arensman FW, Treiber FA, Gruber MP, Strong WB. Exercise-induced differences in cardiac output, blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance in a healthy biracial population of 10 year old boys. Am J Dis Child. 1989;143:212-216.
30. Soto LF, Kikucki DA, Arcilla RA, Savage DD, Berenson GS. Echocardiographic functions and blood pressure levels in children and young adults from a biracial population: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Med Sci. 1989:297:271-279.
31. Dysart JM, Treiber FA, Pfieger K, Davis H, Strong WB. Ethnic differences in the myocardial and vascular reactivity to stress in normotensive girls. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:15-22.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Falkner B. Is there a black hypertension? Hypertension. 1987;10:551-554.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Syme, M. Abrahamowicz, G. T. Leonard, M. Perron, L. Richer, S. Veillette, Y. Xiao, D. Gaudet, T. Paus, and Z. Pausova Sex Differences in Blood Pressure and Its Relationship to Body Composition and Metabolism in Adolescence Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, September 1, 2009; 163(9): 818 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Authors/Task Force Members:, G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak, R. Cifkova, R. Fagard, G. Germano, G. Grassi, A. M. Heagerty, S. E. Kjeldsen, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., June 11, 2007; (2007) ehm236v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Daniels, J. A. Morrison, D. L. Sprecher, P. Khoury, and T. R. Kimball Association of Body Fat Distribution and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents Circulation, February 2, 1999; 99(4): 541 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Falkner, S. Hulman, and H. Kushner Birth Weight Versus Childhood Growth as Determinants of Adult Blood Pressure Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 145 - 150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |