(Hypertension. 1996;28:98-103.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Departamento Bioquimica y Biologia Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Malaga, and Hospital Regional Carlos Haya (P.A.-L.), Malaga, Spain.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: receptors, angiotensin II angiotensin-converting enzyme antihypertensive therapy genotype polymerase chain reaction RNA
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been shown that ACE (kininase II, EC 3.4.15.1) presents a polymorphism consisting of the presence or absence of a 250-bp DNA fragment. This polymorphism has been correlated to serum immunoreactive ACE concentrations, which are higher in the presence of the D allele.17 The relationship between the D allele and the high risk of a cardiovascular event18 and familial hypertension19 has been studied recently. However, the importance of this polymorphism in the onset and treatment of hypertension still needs to be clarified.
Quantification of human Ang II receptors has been done by Scatchard analysis in platelets,20 Northern blotting, and RT-PCR. Gene quantification by PCR is based on a linear fitting of the exponential growth obtained after amplification of different concentrations of the template using a modified internal standard that allows quantification by comparison of bands or extrapolation in a standard curve. We propose a method using an unmodified internal standard identical to a target molecule that simplifies and improves the methodological criteria. This work demonstrates that AT1 receptor mRNA levels can be studied in human PBMCs. This analysis allows us to study the regulation of this gene in different physiopathologic conditions. It is a very useful tool for examining hypertensive individuals as well as the effect of different antihypertensive treatments. On the other hand, AT2 receptor mRNA was undetectable in the same samples.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Study Protocol
After the purpose of the study had been explained to the subjects, their medication was stopped for 15 days and they maintained the same daily standard diet (60 mmol sodium, 90 mmol potassium, 10 mmol calcium, 8400 J daily). All the study subjects were ACE-typed by PCR; 100 µL of peripheral blood was taken by finger puncture for this purpose.
Thirty normotensive and 50 hypertensive subjects were divided into three groups according to their individual genotype (II, ID, or DD). The 50 hypertensive subjects were divided into three groups according to the hypertensive drug to be administered (verapamil HCl: II, n=5; ID, n=7; DD, n=5; enalapril maleate: II, n=5; ID, n=7; DD, n=5; and bisoprolol fumarate: II, n=5; ID, n=6; DD, n=5). Each subject group was studied on no medication before treatment and then after treatment with a single hypertensive drug (verapamil HCl, 240 mg/d; enalapril maleate, 20 mg/d; bisoprolol fumarate, 5 mg/d). After 15 days without treatment and after 15 days with treatment, 20 mL of blood was collected. Subjects were kept half an hour in the supine position, and samples were taken for measurement of biochemical parameters and collection of PBMCs. Pulse rate and blood pressure were also measured after a 5-minute rest while subjects were sitting.
Genotyping
DNA was prepared from whole blood (50 µL) that was mixed with 0.5 mL TE buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, pH 8.0) and spun for 10 seconds at 13 000g. This procedure was repeated twice more, and the final pellet was resuspended in 100 µL digestion buffer (PCR buffer without gelatin or bovine serum albumin containing 0.5% Tween 20 and 100 mg/L fresh proteinase K). Samples were incubated 45 minutes at 56°C and then 10 minutes at 95°C. For PCR, 10 µL was used. PCR conditions were as previously described by Rigat et al.21
Total RNA Isolation
PBMCs were obtained from 20 mL EDTA-anticoagulated blood. Total RNA from these cells was isolated by the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi.22 For elimination of contaminating DNA, all samples were treated with RNAse-free DNAse.23 RNA was quantified by spectrophotometry at 260 nm and then stored as single-use aliquots at -70°C.
Standard Specific mRNA Isolation
To obtain an internal standard for quantitative RT-PCR, we isolated total RNA as described above. Two hundred micrograms total RNA was used for subsequent specific mRNA isolation. Total RNA was added to a clean tube containing extraction buffer (2 mol/L guanidine thiocyanate, 12.5 mmol/L sodium citrate, 3x SSC, 5 mmol/L Tris [pH 7.4], 0.5 mmol/L Na2EDTA, 0.12% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1% 2-mercaptoethanol) and a constant concentration of the specific biotinylated oligonucleotide (150 pmol) complementary to the AT1 receptor gene (5'-GGCGGGACTTCATTGGGTGAACAATAGCCAGGTATCGATC-3', MedProbe) and was incubated at 70°C for 5 minutes. This mixture was centrifuged at 12 000g for 10 minutes at room temperature to precipitate the proteins. Streptavidin paramagnetics particles (2 mg) (Promega Corp) were washed three times with 0.5x SSC and added to the former homogenate. After 2 minutes at room temperature, beads were captured with a magnetic rack, and three stringent washes with 0.5x SSC were done. To elute the specific mRNA, 500 µL RNase-free water was added. Samples were concentrated with 3 mol/L ammonium acetate (0.1 vol), 20 g/L glycogen (0.02 vol) (Boehringer Mannheim), and 2 vol 2-propanol. Pellets were redissolved in 10 µL ribonuclease-free water. To obtain enough of the specific mRNA, we carried out these procedures three times and mixed the pellets together. Free solution capillary electrophoresis with a UV detector (Prime Vision, System IV, Europhor) was carried out with a 75-µm capillary 60 cm in length (450 mm to the detector) and TBE buffer (89 mmol/L Tris, 89 mmol/L boric acid, 2 mmol/L Na2EDTA, pH 8.3). Samples (2.7 nL) were introduced into the capillary by high vacuum for 0.5 second. Separation within the capillary was performed under a constant voltage of 40 V/mm.24 The specific mRNA concentration was calculated by integrating the peak area, and then mRNA samples were stored as single-use aliquots at -70°C.
Specific mRNA was amplified by RT-PCR (see below). A 414-bp PCR product was obtained as expected and confirmed by sequencing. For determination of possible contamination, the interleukin-1
and ß-actin genes were amplified by RT-PCR, and no bands were obtained.
Oligonucleotides
Primers were selected with the Oligo program (MedProbe). The specific primers for AT1 were as follows: forward, 5'-ACTGGCTGACTTATGCTTTTTACTG-3'; reverse, 5'-AGAAAAGGAAACAGGAAACCCAGTA-3'. The specific primers for AT2 were as follows: forward, 5'-CCTTTTGGCTACTCTTCCTCTATGG-3'; reverse, 5'-TTGGTCACGGGTTATCCTGTTCTTC-3'.
RT-PCR
Isolated total RNA was assayed by RT-PCR in a Perkin-Elmer Cetus Thermocycler. Samples of 800 ng total RNA were duplicated. Captured specific mRNA (0.5 pg) was added to one of the tubes as an internal standard (see below). Samples then were mixed with 40 U RNasin (Promega), 1 mmol/L of each dNTP, 60 U Moloney murine leukemia virus RT (Promega), and 2.5 mmol/L random hexamers in 20 µL RT buffer (10 mmol/L Tris [pH 8.3], 50 mmol/L KCl, 1% Triton X-100, 25 mmol/L MgCl2). Samples were incubated at 42°C for 45 minutes and then denatured at 95°C for 10 minutes. Both aliquots were then subjected to amplification with the addition of 40 pmol of the upper primer, 40 pmol of the lower primer, and 2.5 U AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Promega) in 80 µL of 1x PCR buffer. The amplification protocol was 60 seconds at 94°C, 60 seconds at 54°C, and 120 seconds at 72°C, 30 cycles, and then 7 minutes at 72°C.
PCR products were electrophoresed on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide; the optical density of the band was measured with a Sun Spark computer station with Visage software (Millipore). Furthermore, 15 µL of each PCR product was quantified by measurement of fluorescence intensity with the use of Hoechst reagent 33258 (Polysciences Inc) as dye (excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 and 460 nm, respectively). AT1 mRNA levels were then determined on the basis of the standard curve.
Standard RNAs
A standard curve of RNA was obtained by study of the amplification process at different cycles. Serially diluted samples were amplified at different cycles, and the optimal cycle (30 cycles) and seven different amounts (from 5x10-2 to 5x10-8 µg) were used to obtain a standard curve. An amount of 0.5 pg was selected as internal standard for additions.
RT Efficiency
To evaluate the efficiency of the RT reaction, we studied the molar ratio of the obtained cDNA and the amount of the starting specific mRNA for different concentrations of the specific mRNA. The results indicated that under the conditions used, cDNA first strand synthesis had an efficiency of 67.5±5.5% (n=10). To determine the influence of nonspecific RNA in retrotranscription efficiency, we retrotranscribed different amounts of rRNA (0.1 to 1 µg) with 0.5 pg of the specific mRNA; a higher efficiency was shown when 800 ng total RNA was used.
Hormone Measurements
Blood samples for measurement of PRA, Ang II, and aldosterone were collected (with EDTA as anticoagulant), centrifuged immediately, and kept frozen at -70°C until assayed. Plasma Ang II (Nichols Institute) and aldosterone (DPC) concentrations were determined by radioimmunoassay. PRA was estimated with a radioimmunoassay kit for angiotensin I (Nichols Institute).
Statistical Methods
Results are reported as mean±SD. Independent Student's t test was used except when data before and after treatment were analyzed. In this case, paired Student's t test was used. Regression analysis was performed by the Pearson correlation coefficient.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
AT1 receptor expression was quantified in 30 normotensive subjects divided into three groups (n=10 for each genotype) and 50 hypertensive individuals who were treated with three different antihypertensive drugs: an ACE inhibitor, a ß1-blocker, and a calcium antagonist. Additive quantitative PCR is based on the use of an internal standard added to each sample (Fig 1
). The use of an internal standard identical to the target sequence represents a control system for RT-PCR efficiency and allows a continuous validation of accuracy based on recovery.
|
In normotensive subjects, a significant increase in AT1 expression related to the D allele (P<.01) was observed. These values correlated well with PRA levels (r=.66, P<.05) (Fig 2A
). In untreated hypertensive subjects, similar results were obtained (r=.72, P<.01) (Fig 2B
), although AT1 expression was higher than in normotensive subjects (Table 2
).
|
|
ACE inhibitor treatment induced a statistically significant decrease of AT1 receptor expression in the DD and ID genotype groups; this decrease was more significant in the DD group. In the II group, the expression was lower but not significantly. PRA and Ang II plasma levels changed significantly only in the DD group after treatment. This was the only group in which Ang II plasma levels decreased after any antihypertensive therapy. On the other hand, ID subjects did not have a significant decrease in Ang II levels after ACE inhibition. Aldosterone did not show significant variations (Table 3
).
|
A significant decrease was observed in AT1 receptor expression in the II and ID groups after calcium channel antagonist treatment; the decrease was not significant in the DD group. In this case, PRA levels increased significantly in all the groups, but no significant variations in Ang II and aldosterone plasma levels were found (Table 3
).
The use of a ß1-blocker did not produce any significant variation in the studied parameters (Table 3
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of variation in Ang II receptor expression, it is difficult to relate receptor expression to primary hypertension.25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 One of these difficulties has been to select a target tissue for determination of this variability. Several studies25 26 27 28 31 32 33 have used platelet Ang II receptors, and a few studies27 29 30 31 have examined these receptors in mononuclear leukocytes.16 Since these previous studies measured Ang II receptors at the protein level in human blood cells, the possibility that Ang II is taken up by free fluid endocytosis, especially in mononuclear leukocytes, cannot be excluded.27 31 Therefore, the role of Ang II receptors in hypertension has not yet been clarified.
The present work demonstrates that AT1 receptor mRNA can be studied in human PBMCs. The analysis of AT1 receptor gene expression in these cells allows us to study the regulation in different physiopathologic conditions. However, AT2 receptor mRNA was undetectable in the same samples.
In normotensive and untreated hypertensive subjects, AT1 receptor expression was elevated in relation to the D allele.19 This increment coincided with a moderate increase in plasma Ang II levels, suggesting that expression of the AT1 receptor gene is upregulated by plasma Ang II, as in other tissues. Taking into account that ACE activity increases in the presence of the D allele, it is possible to assume that the increment of AT1 receptor is mediated by Ang II.
The most important decrease in AT1 receptor gene expression was found in subjects with the DD genotype when treated with an ACE inhibitor. This decrease coincided with a normalization of blood pressure levels. A decrease in AT1 receptor expression was also observed in the ID genotype group. No changes were found in either AT1 receptor expression or blood pressure in the II genotype group.34
With respect to calcium channel antagonist treatment, a significant decrease in expression was observed in subjects with the II and ID genotypes. In this case, the decrease of blood pressure in subjects with the II genotype was higher and more stable. A significant increase in PRA levels and nonsignificant decrease in plasma Ang II concentration were also observed in all the genotypes, probably because of the well-documented effect of decreasing intracellular calcium.35
As was expected in hypertensive subjects, nonsignificant decreases in AT1 receptor expression and PRA and plasma Ang II levels were observed after treatment with a ß1-blocker, since this molecule directly suppresses renin release by deleting renal ß1-adrenergic drive.35
The low number of Ang II receptors in PBMCs led us to use a more sensitive method than binding assays. RT-PCR has been widely used for measurement of gene expression. RT-PCR efficiency and detection signal of PCR products change when an internal standard of different size or structure to the wild-type is used.36 Therefore, if in competitive assays the quantification attempts to be closer to the real value, the obtained data need to be corrected by at least two factors: first, the correction that relates to the efficiencies of the RT step and the efficiency of the PCR itself; and second, the correction of the signal when an internal standard of different size is applied irrespective of the detection system (fluorescence, radioactivity, or optical density). In the method described in the present work, the addition of an identical internal standard has two practical features: It increases the measurable signal to the range of the curve of higher sensitivity, and it controls the accuracy in each single sample. Duplicated aliquots with and without an internal standard can be used for calculation of the recovery of the standard in each sample. Moreover, this protocol is simpler than classic competitive PCR because no standards with different concentrations are used for each assay and there is no unnecessary correction of the efficiency and signal detection.
In conclusion, a more significant decrease of AT1 mRNA expression is observed in subjects with the DD genotype when treated with an ACE inhibitor, whereas in subjects with the II genotype, this decrease is higher when a calcium channel antagonist is used. Furthermore, in a screening of ACE-typed subjects under long-term effective antihypertensive treatment, we found that 72% of those who were taking ACE inhibitors had the DD genotype and 58% of those taking calcium channel antagonists had the II genotype (unpublished data, 1995). Although further studies are needed, we think that knowledge of ACE genotype could help physicians when they are establishing antihypertensive treatment.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 26, 1996;
first decision February 29, 1996; first decision March 13, 1996;
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Curnow KM, Pascoe L, White PC. Genetic analysis of the human type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:1113-1118.
3. Elton TS, Stephan CC, Taylor GR, Kimball MG, Martin MM, Durand JN, Oparil S. Isolation of two distinct type I angiotensin II receptor genes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;184:1067-1073.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Murphy TJ, Alexander RW, Griendling KK, Runge MS, Bernstein KE. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Nature. 1991;351:233-236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Iwai N, Inagami T. Identification of two subtypes in the rat type I angiotensin II receptor. FEBS Lett. 1992;298:257-260.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Sanberg K, Ji H, Clark AJL, Shapira H, Catt KJ. Cloning and expression of a novel angiotensin II receptor subtype. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:9455-9458.
7. Furuta H, Guo DF, Inagami T. Molecular cloning and sequencing of the gene encoding human angiotensin II type I receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;183:8-13.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Takayanagi R, Ohnaka K, Sakai Y, Nakao R, Yanase T, Haji M, Inagami T, Furuta H, Gou DF, Nakamuta M, Nawata H. Molecular cloning, sequence analysis and expression of a cDNA encoding human type-1 angiotensin II receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;183:910-916.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Bernstein KE, Alexander RW. COUNTERPOINT: molecular analysis of the angiotensin II receptor. Endocr Rev. 1992;13:381-386.
10. Mauzy CA, Hwang O, Egloff AM, Wu LH, Chung FZ. Cloning, expression, and characterization of a gene encoding the human angiotensin II type 1A receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;186:277-284.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Peach MJ, Dostal DE. The angiotensin II receptor and the actions of angiotensin II. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16:S25-S30.
12.
Bunkenburg B, Van Amelsvoort T, Rogg H, Wood M. Receptor-mediated effects of angiotensin II on growth of vascular smooth muscle from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1992;20:746-754.
13. Millan MA, Carvallo P, Izumi SI, Zemel S, Catt KJ, Aguilera G. Novel sites of expression of functional angiotensin II binding sites and their functional significance. Mol Pharmacol. 1989;38:370-377.[Abstract]
14. Naftilan AJ, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Induction of platelet-derived growth factor A-chain and c-myc gene expressions by angiotensin II in cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1419-1424.
15. Grady EF, Sechi LA, Griffin CA, Schambelan M, Kalinyak JE. Expression of AT2 receptors in the developing rat fetus. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:921-933.
16. Lin SY, Goodfriend TL. Angiotensin receptors. Am J Physiol. 1970;218:1319-1328.
17. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Corvol P, Soubrier F. An insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:1343-1346.
18.
Cambien F, Costerousse O, Tiret L, Poirier O, Lecerf L, Gonzales MF, Evans A, Arveiler D, Cambou JP, Luc G, Rakotovao R, Ducimetiere P, Soubrier F, Alhenc-Gelas F. Plasma level and gene polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme in relation to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1994;90:669-676.
19. Morris BJ, Zee RYL, Schrader A. Different frequencies of angiotensin-converting enzyme genotypes in older hypertensive individuals. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1085-1089.
20. Ding YA, Kenyon CJ, Semple PF. Receptors for angiotensin II on platelets from man. Clin Sci. 1984;66:725-731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Rigat B, Hubert C, Corvol P, Soubrier F. PCR detection of the insertion/deletion polymorphism of the human angiotensin converting enzyme gene (DCP1) (dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase 1). Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20:1433.
22. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156-159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Reyes A, Dieguez JL, Garcia-Chacon I, Morell M, Ruiz M, Montilla JC. Contaminating DNA in RNA amplification by polymerase chain reaction. Clin Chem. 1992;38:1187.
24.
Reyes-Engel A, Dieguez-Lucena JL. Direct quantification of specific mRNA using a selected biotinylated oligonucleotide by free solution capillary electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993;21:759-760.
25.
Moore TJ, Taylor T, Williams GH. Angiotensin II receptors on human platelets. Circ Res. 1981;51:314-320.
26.
Moore TJ, Taylor T, Williams GH. Human platelet angiotensin II receptors: regulation by the circulating angiotensin level. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984;58:778-782.
27. Mann JFE, Sis J, Ritz E. 125I-angiotensin II binding to human blood cells. J Hypertens. 1985;3:131-137.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Mann JFE, Leidig M, Ritz E. Human angiotensin II receptors are regulated by angiotensin II. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1988;10:151-168.
29.
Shimada K, Yazaki Y. Binding sites for angiotensin II in human mononuclear leucocytes. J Biochem. 1978;84:1013-1015.
30. Ohuchi U, Yazaki Y, Kato Y, Ashida T, Shimada K. Studies on angiotensin II receptors of mononuclear leucocytes in Bartter's syndrome, renovascular hypertension and primary aldosteronism. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1980;2:349. Abstract.
31.
Graves SW, Moore TJ, Seely EW. Increased platelet angiotensin II receptor number in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:627-632.
32. Crabos M, Bertschin S, Buhler FR, Rogg H, Evezuoz D, Eberhard M, Erne P. Identification of AT1 receptors on human platelets and decreased angiotensin II binding in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11(suppl 5):S230-S231.
33. Duggan J, Kilfeather S, O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Nussberger J. Effects of aging and hypertension on plasma angiotensin II and platelet angiotensin II receptor density. Am J Hypertens. 1992;5:687-693.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Case DB, Wallace JM, Keim HJ, Weber MA, Sealey JE, Laragh JH. Possible role of renin in hypertension as suggested by renin-sodium profiling and inhibition of converting enzyme. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:641-646.[Abstract]
35. Sealey JE, Laragh JH. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system for normal regulation of blood pressure and sodium and potassium homeostasis. In: Sealey JE, Laragh JH, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1995:1763-1796.
36. Van Gemen B, Kievits T, Shukkink R, Strijp DV, Malek LT, Sooknanan R, Huisman HG, Lens P. Quantification of HIV-1 RNA in plasma using NASBATM during HIV-1 primary infection. J Virol Methods. 1993;43:177-188.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J Milionis, M. S Kostapanos, K. Vakalis, I. Theodorou, I. Bouba, R. Kalaitzidis, I. Georgiou, M. S Elisaf, and K. C Siamopoulos Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system genes on the treatment response of patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 181 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Baudin Polymorphism in angiotensin II receptor genes and hypertension Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 277 - 282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jones, S. S. Dhamrait, J. R. Payne, E. Hawe, P. Li, I. S. Toor, L. Luong, P. T.E. Wootton, G. J. Miller, S. E. Humphries, et al. Genetic Variants of Angiotensin II Receptors and Cardiovascular Risk in Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 500 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Li, Y. Du, Y. Du, and X. Huang Correlation of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Gene Polymorphism with Effect of Antihypertensive Therapy by Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1): 25 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Anderson, J. F. Carlquist, B. D. Home, and J. B. Muhlestein Cardiovascular Pharmacogenomics: Current Status, Future Prospects Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2003; 8(1): 71 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Redfield, R. J. Rodeheffer, S. J. Jacobsen, D. W. Mahoney, K. R. Bailey, and J. C. Burnett Jr Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 4, 2002; 40(5): 976 - 982. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Wang, A. Zagariya, O. Ibarra-Sunga, C. Gidea, E. Ang, S. Deshmukh, G. Chaudhary, J. Baraboutis, G. Filippatos, and B. D. Uhal Angiotensin II induces apoptosis in human and rat alveolar epithelial cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): L885 - L889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. I. Rice, C. A. Foy, and P. J. Grant Angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin II type 1-receptor gene polymorphisms and risk of ischaemic heart disease Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 1999; 41(3): 746 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |