(Hypertension. 1996;28:1132-1137.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Victor J. Dzau, MD, Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: gene transfer hypertension, essential genetics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Our laboratory has been developing a complementary approach to the transgenic technique involving in vivo gene transfer to study the contribution of specific genes to cardiovascular diseases. The potential usefulness of this approach is summarized in Table 1
. This approach may be an effective method for study of the local function of target genes. In vivo gene transfer can produce the local overexpression of a target gene (gain-of-function approach) or the inhibition of a specific gene (loss-of-function approach). Gene transfer can theoretically be performed at the desirable age of the animal, barring technical issues. Thus, the roles of candidate genes that are activated or inactivated during the pathogenesis of hypertension can be explored with this approach. In vivo gene transfer is also an effective method for study of the unknown functions of a newly cloned gene. In addition, we have recently developed a novel approach using transcriptional factor "decoy" in vivo to modulate the interaction of a specific transcription factor with the corresponding cis-element that is involved in tissue-specific gene expression. However, in vivo gene transfer has certain limitations, including the relative low efficiency of transfection, the limited duration of transgene expression, the technical difficulty in studying embryonic and developmental influences of the target gene, and the limited ability to study simultaneous gene expression or inhibition in multiple tissues. Nevertheless, the simplicity of the technology, the possibility of activating or inhibiting the expression of a gene at a specific time and in a specific tissue, and the ability to examine the local effects of a gene independent of systemic effects are some of the advantages of this approach. Thus, this technology is a useful addition to the existing molecular genetic methods in the study of genes in cardiovascular diseases. In this article, we review the current experience with this strategy for genetic studies of hypertension.
| Principles of Gene Transfer for Hypertension Research |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Gain-of-Function Approach
The gain-of-function approach examines the effect or effects of overexpressing a specific gene to elucidate the function or role of that gene and/or to develop a therapeutic strategy based on the overproduction of the specific gene product. In the cardiovascular system, many factors have been postulated to exert autocrine-paracrine actions. Definitive proof for their local functions cannot be obtained because in vivo studies are limited by the multiplicity of coexisting variables, the difficulties in manipulating individual components, and the methodological limitations in studying the function of locally produced modulators in the absence of any contribution by the circulation. Local overexpression of a candidate gene will give us insight into the contribution of that gene to local tissue function in hypertension. Using this approach, we have documented the direct vascular hypertrophic action of Ang II6 and the growth-inhibitory effect of NO.17 Furthermore, the overexpression of NO synthase has been shown to be therapeutically effective in a model of experimental vascular proliferative disease.
Loss-of-Function Approach
Another strategy involves an antigene approach in which targeted genes are inactivated by specific antisense DNA or RNA that is either synthesized as oligonucleotides or transcribed from an expression plasmid. The antisense hybridizes specifically with its target gene or mRNA, thereby inactivating gene transcription or translation. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides have been used successfully to inhibit specific protein synthesis in a number of biological systems.8 18 Antisense technology can be applied to any candidate gene whose nucleotide sequence is known. The effectiveness of antisense oligonucleotides is limited by the low efficiency of cellular uptake and subsequent rapid degradation of the oligonucleotide in the endocytotic-lysosomal pathway. Modification of the oligonucleotide backbone such as phosphorothioate linkages and transfection with the HVJ liposome have enhanced stability and efficiency.9 19 The use of antisense oligonucleotides as a strategy to selectively block the expression of specific genes represents an important innovation in cell biology research, and this paradigm of gene inhibition has many potential therapeutic applications.
In Vivo Modulation of Gene Transcription
In vivo gene transfer techniques may be useful for the study of promoter function in vivo. Previous investigators have reported the feasibility of direct gene transfer into the heart or arterial wall for characterization of the sequences necessary for proper gene regulation in vivo.20 21 22 We have used the transcriptional factor "decoy" method to test the validity of specific cis- and trans-acting factor interaction involved in tissue-specific gene expression in vivo. This strategy is based on the competition for a trans-acting factor between the endogenous cis-element present in a target gene and an exogenously added oligonucleotide corresponding to that cis-sequence. This approach should prevent the trans-acting factor from interacting with the endogenous cis-element, thereby modulating gene expression. Bielinska et al23 used this method to block octamer transcription factor or nuclear factor-
Bdependent trans-activation in B lymphocytes. Sullenger et al24 reported that overexpression of the sequences containing trans-activation response element rendered CD4-positive human T lymphoid cells that were resistant to human immunodeficiency virus replication. Thus, using the decoy approach, one can turn off or on a target gene and thereby investigate the function of the target gene in vivo.
Potential Gene Therapy
Molecular and cellular biology research has identified critical mediators that may be involved in hypertension. The capacity to manipulate the gene expression of these mediators with antigene or gene augmentation strategies may be applied toward future gene therapy of hypertension. However, current in vivo methods for gene transfer are still limited by relatively low transfection efficiency and their potential toxicity.
| Methods of In Vivo Gene Transfer |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fusigenic Viral LiposomeMediated Gene Transfer
We have recently used a highly efficient and simple method of DNA transfer with fusigenic viral liposome complex. This method involves the encapsulation of DNA in neutral liposomes that are then complexed with UV-inactivated Sendai virus (also known as HVJ).31 The HVJ envelope fusion proteins enhance the fusion of the liposomes with cell membranes, facilitating the intracellular delivery of the DNA. A further modification, complexing the DNA with nonhistone protein, ie, high mobility group-1 protein, increases the nuclear translocation of the DNA and the transcription of the transgene. The HVJ liposome technique possesses improved properties for gene transfer, such as efficiency, safety, simplicity, and brevity of incubation time as well as no limitation of inserted DNA size; furthermore, it has been shown to be efficient in multiple animal species. This method is also suitable for the transfer of oligonucleotides, whereas the other virus-mediated transfer techniques are not.
Liposome-Mediated and Mechanically Mediated Gene Transfer
Many investigators have reported the utility of cationic liposomes for transfection in vitro. Although Lim et al32 reported the successful transfection of DNA using liposomes into intact coronary and peripheral arteries in vivo, this method requires a long incubation time, and the transfection efficiency is low. Indolfi et al33 demonstrated that the transfection of dominant-negative ras gene with pluronic gel prevented neointimal formation in balloon-injured rat carotid artery. Mechanical DNA transfection with high-energy microparticle bombardment34 appears to be an effective method for in situ gene transfer into solid organs such as the liver. Other methods of mechanical DNA transfer, eg, transduction under increased pressure, are currently under investigation.
| In Vivo Gene Transfer in Hypertension |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endothelium-derived NO, another important vasoactive substance, has been postulated to be an important endogenous inhibitor of vascular lesion formation.35 In vitro studies have demonstrated the ability of NO to inhibit VSMC growth and migration.36 In vivo administration of NO donors has been shown to inhibit neointimal hyperplasia.36 37 However, the interpretation of the in vivo results with NO donors is clouded by the hemodynamic effects of these agents. Accordingly, we overexpressed endothelial cell NO synthase (ec-NOS) gene in the balloon-injured rat carotid artery model, which is characterized by neointimal hyperplasia involving VSMC migration and proliferation in vivo. In vivo transfection of ec-NOS cDNA restored NO production in the injured, endothelium-denuded rat carotid artery, resulting in a marked reduction (70%) of neointimal lesion formation.17 These findings provide direct evidence that NO is an endogenous inhibitor of VSMC growth and support the importance of NO in modulating the vascular remodeling in hypertension.
In Vivo Functions of Newly Cloned Genes in Hypertension
Another application of in vivo gene transfer is to examine the unknown function or functions of a novel molecule. Most of the known effects of Ang II in adult tissues are mediated by the AT1 receptor. Recently, a second receptor subtype known as the AT2 receptor was cloned7 38 ; however, little is known about the regulation and physiological functions of this novel receptor. The highly abundant expression of this receptor during embryonic growth and its rapid disappearance after birth have led to the suggestion that this receptor is involved in growth, development, and/or differentiation. With a gain-of-function approach using in vivo gene transfer, we tested the hypothesis that the AT2 receptor can modulate VSMC growth. We observed that in vivo gene transfer and the overexpression of the rat AT2 receptor in injured rat carotid artery resulted in decreased DNA synthesis and the attenuation of neointimal hyperplasia.39 When neointimal area was analyzed at 14 days after injury and transfection, a 70% decrease was observed. Taken together, these results suggest that the AT2 receptor exerts an antiproliferative effect on cell growth.40 Additional data demonstrated that the AT2 receptor action counteracted the growth-promoting activity of the AT1 receptor. These observations have important implications in our understanding of the role of locally generated vasoactive substances in the process of vascular remodeling. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the usefulness of this approach for identifying the unknown functions of newly cloned genes in hypertension.
Gene Transcription In Vivo
Renin, an aspartyl proteinase involved in the regulation of cardiovascular homeostasis, exhibits tissue-specific regulation. The DBA/2J mouse contains two renin gene loci: Ren-1d and Ren-2d. Ren-2d but not Ren-1d is expressed in submandibular gland, and both are expressed in the kidney. Our previous in vitro studies of the molecular mechanisms of mouse renin gene expression using promoter-reporter gene experiments and gel mobility shift assays suggest that tissue-regulated expression depends on the interaction of an NRE in the renin gene promoter with the transcriptional factor NREB.13 41 These data are derived from experiments with in vitro biochemical methods and noncognate cell systems and need to be verified in vivo. We examined the molecular mechanism at the in vivo level using direct gene transfer.42 Fragments of the Ren-1d or Ren-2d promoter were fused to a CAT gene expression vector. These constructs complexed in HVJ liposome were injected directly into the mouse submandibular gland or intra-arterially into the mouse kidney via the renal artery. In the submandibular gland, Ren-1d fragment containing the NRE abolished CAT expression, and deletion of the NRE restored CAT expression. The homologous fragment from the Ren-2d promoter did not inhibit CAT expression, and deletion of the 150-bp insertion resulted in inhibition. Cotransfection of Ren-1d construct with Ren-1dNRE oligonucleotides as transcriptional factor decoy restored CAT expression. Contrary to the situation in the submandibular gland, transfection with a Ren-1d fragmentCAT construct or Ren-2d fragmentCAT construct into the kidney showed similar levels of CAT expression.
We have also used in vivo DNA transfection to study the interaction of a specific DNA element with nuclear protein and to modulate gene transcription in vivo. We used the transcriptional factor decoy approach to investigate renin gene expression. Renin is synthesized in high quantities in the juxtaglomerular cells of the kidney, but little or none exists in the liver. We have identified by sequence homology analysis that the mouse, rat, and human renin genes contain the conserved NRE.14 15 We examined the possibility that the interaction between the NRE in the promoter region of the rat renin gene and the NREB in the liver contributes to the suppressed hepatic renin gene expression in vivo. We used in vivo transfection of NRE transcriptional factor decoy double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide into the rat liver via portal vein infusion.10 Gel mobility shift assay showed that transfected NRE decoy blocked endogenous NREB binding with NRE in the rat renin gene. "Turning on" the renin gene in the rat liver by blocking NREB binding resulted in increased hepatic renin expression and circulating renin activity. Taken together, these results document the importance of NREB in the inhibition of renin gene expression in the rat liver in vivo and suggest the possibility of in vivo renin gene modulation by the transcriptional factor decoy approach. These results also revealed that the in vivo transfer technique with the HVJ liposome combined with the transcriptional factor decoy is useful for the general investigation of cis- and trans-element interactions in tissue-specific gene regulation in vivo.
Applications Toward Gene and Molecular Therapy
We have reviewed previously the potentials of in vivo gene transfer for gene therapy of cardiovascular diseases.1 Our laboratory has demonstrated the effectiveness of antisense oligonucleotide to cell cycle regulatory genes,9 19 decoy oligodeoxynucleotide to transcriptional factor E2F,11 and expression plasmid encoding ec-NOS in the treatment of experimental models of vascular proliferative disease in rat17 and in the development of genetically engineered vascular graft ex vivo.12 In vivo gene transfer strategy may also be applied toward hypertension therapy.
We have applied the HVJ liposome method to transfect antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, and this method enhanced the efficiency and prolonged the half-life of antisense oligodeoxynucleotides in vitro and in vivo.9 19 Using this delivery system, Tomita et al16 transfected antisense oligodeoxynucleotide against rat angiotensinogen into the rat liver via portal vein infusion and observed that antisense oligodeoxynucleotide transfection resulted in a transient decrease (up to 7 days after transfection) in plasma angiotensinogen levels in the SHR, consistent with the reduction of hepatic angiotensinogen mRNA. Plasma Ang II concentration was also decreased in rats transfected with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides, and transient decreases in blood pressure from days 1 to 4 were observed.
The brain has all the components of an Ang II production system, and an overactive brain local renin-angiotensin system has been implicated in the development and maintenance of high blood pressure in the SHR. To examine whether angiotensinogen reduction in the brain would lower blood pressure in the SHR, Wielbo et al43 administered phosphorothioated antisense oligonucleotide targeted to angiotensinogen mRNA intracerebroventricularly in SHR. They demonstrated that intracerebroventricular administration of antisense oligonucleotide for angiotensinogen lowered blood pressure to normotensive levels in the SHR. They also reported that angiotensinogen production was significantly decreased in the brain stem and hypothalamus of the rats treated with intracerebroventricular antisense oligonucleotide. On the other hand, intra-arterial antisense oligonucleotide against angiotensinogen did not affect blood pressure.
Recently, Morishita et al44 studied the effectiveness of the transcriptional factor decoy approach in lowering blood pressure in the SHR. Using HVJ liposome as the delivery system, they infused into the portal vein of SHR double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides against angiotensinogen geneactivating elements (AGE) 2 and 3, which are present in the promoter region. They demonstrated that decoy oligodeoxynucleotides against AGE2 infusion decreased hepatic angiotensinogen mRNA and plasma Ang II concentration. In parallel, systolic pressure also decreased from day 1 to day 6 after decoy oligodeoxynucleotide treatment, whereas AGE3 decoy had little effect. Taken together, these studies demonstrate the feasibility of specific antigene strategy for the treatment of hypertension.
In hypertension drug therapy, many effective agents with minimal side effects already exist. Therefore, the current application of DNA transfer provides primarily a proof of concept for these genetic and molecular principles. However, it may pave the way for future molecular therapeutics aimed at blocking the fundamental pathophysiological and genetic mechanisms of hypertension. As technology for gene transfer improves, thereby enabling stable genomic integration with long-term in vivo gene expression in the absence of any side effects, one can envision using gene replacement, gene augmentation, or gene inhibition in vivo to correct specific genetic defects in human hypertension in the next millennium.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 16, 1996; first decision July 29, 1996; accepted August 15, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. H. Wang, X. Y. Yang, R. A. Kirken, J. H. Resau, and W. L. Farrar Targeted disruption of Stat6 DNA binding activity by an oligonucleotide decoy blocks IL-4-driven TH2 cell response Blood, February 15, 2000; 95(4): 1249 - 1257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zicha and J. Kunes Ontogenetic Aspects of Hypertension Development: Analysis in the Rat Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1227 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Morishita, J. Higaki, N. Tomita, and T. Ogihara Application of Transcription Factor "Decoy" Strategy as Means of Gene Therapy and Study of Gene Expression in Cardiovascular Disease Circ. Res., June 1, 1998; 82(10): 1023 - 1028. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |