Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1997;29:248-253

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gangula, P. R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gangula, P. R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.

(Hypertension. 1997;29:248.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Arthur C. Corcoran Memorial Lecture

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Is a Depressor in NG-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester-Induced Hypertension During Pregnancy

Pandu R. R. Gangula; Scott C. Supowit; Sunil J. Wimalawansa; Huawei Zhao; Diane M. Hallman; Donald J. DiPette; Chandrasekhar Yallampalli

From the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology (P.R.R.G., C.Y.), Internal Medicine (S.C.S., S.J.W., H.Z., D.M.H., D.J.D.), and Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics (S.C.S.), The University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston).

Reprint requests to Chandra Yallampalli, DVM, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 301 University Blvd, Medical Research Bldg, Rm 11.138, Galveston, TX 77555-1062. E-mail cyallamp{at}marlin.UTMB.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Inhibition of nitric oxide production with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) increases blood pressure and fetal mortality in pregnant rats. We previously reported that administration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) reduces the blood pressure and fetal death produced by L-NAME. To determine the hemodynamic role of endogenous CGRP in this setting, CGRP8–37, a CGRP receptor antagonist, was used. In addition, CGRP mRNA and peptide levels were determined in dorsal root ganglia. L-NAME or control rats had intravenous (for drug administration) and arterial (for continuous mean blood pressure monitoring) catheters surgically placed and were studied in the conscious unrestrained state. Baseline blood pressure was higher in the L-NAME than the control rats on days 19, 20, and 21 or pregnancy and postpartum day 1. Vehicle administration did not change blood pressure in any group, and CGRP8–37 (100 µg) did not change blood pressure in control groups. However, CGRP8–37 administration to the L-NAME rats further increased blood pressure (P<.05) on days 19 (8±1), 20 (12±2), and 21 (7±1) of gestation but was without effect on postpartum day 1. Furthermore, CGRP mRNA or peptide levels in dorsal root ganglia were not different between the L-NAME and control rats at any of the time points studied. These data indicate that in experimental preeclampsia, CGRP is playing a compensatory vasodilator role to attenuate the elevated blood pressure. The mechanism of this effect appears to be an enhanced vascular responsiveness to CGRP that is attenuated after the birth of pups.


Key Words: preeclampsia • calcitonin gene-related peptide • L-NAME • gene regulation

Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure • CGRP = calcitonin gene-related peptide • DRG = dorsal root ganglia • iCGRP = immunoreactive CGRP • L-NAME = NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester • MAP = mean arterial pressure • NO = nitric oxide • SHR = spontaneously hypertensive rat(s)


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Preeclampsia is one of the most significant health problems in human pregnancy. It is the leading cause of fetal growth retardation and infant morbidity and mortality associated with premature delivery and maternal death. Hypertension, decreased fetal growth, and proteinurea are the hallmarks of preeclampsia, although the pathophysiology of this condition remains unclear.1 The role of NO in the etiology of pre-eclampsia has been the subject of many recent studies, and the data is unclear. There is, however, accumulating evidence that there is an impaired function of the NO-cGMP system in women with preeclampsia.2–4 We and others have reported that in pregnant rats the inhibition of NO synthesis with analogues of L-arginine such as L-NAME causes hypertension, proteinuria, fetal growth retardation, and increased fetal mortality without affecting gestational length.5–7 We have used this model of preeclampsia to assess the role of several regulatory agents on the pathophysiology of this disorder, including the NO-cGMP system,7,8 the female sex steroid hormones,7 and most recently, the potent vasodilator neuropeptide CGRP.9

CGRP is produced by the tissue-specific alternative splicing of the primary transcript of the calcitonin/CGRP gene.10 This peptide is distributed throughout the central and peripheral nervous systems and is located in areas involved in cardiovascular function.11,12 A prominent site of CGRP synthesis is the DRG. DRG contain the cell bodies of primary afferent neurons that extend CGRP- containing nerves to peripheral sites such as blood vessels and the central spinal cord.13,14 A dense perivascular CGRP neural network is seen around the blood vessels in virtually all vascular beds.11 Systemic administration of CGRP decreases BP in a dose-dependent manner in both normotensive animals and humans, as well as in SHR.11,12,15 The primary mechanism responsible for this BP reduction is peripheral arterial dilation.16

We have previously reported that the neuronal expression of CGRP is differentially regulated in two nonpregnant models of hypertension. In SHR, iCGRP content was decreased in laminae I and II of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, and CGRP mRNA levels were reduced in DRG compared with normotensive Wistar-Kyoto control rats.17,18 In contrast, in the mineralocorticoid-salt (DOC-salt)—induced hypertensive rat, iCGRP levels were elevated in the spinal cord, and CGRP mRNA accumulation was increased in DRG compared with normotensive controls.19 These results suggest that a decrease in CGRP expression, as observed in the SHR, could contribute to the high BP by the relative reduction of vasodilator activity, while an increase in CGRP, as seen in DOC-salt hypertension, could attenuate the high BP by the compensatory augmentation of vasodilator activity. In support of the latter, we recently demonstrated that the intravenous administration of CGRP8–37, a potent and specific CGRP receptor antagonist, resulted in a significant increase in the already elevated BP in DOC-salt hypertension rats but was without effect in normotensive controls.20

Several other lines of evidence suggest that CGRP participates in the regulation of vascular adaptations that occur during normal pregnancy and also in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. During pregnancy in humans, the circulating levels of iCGRP increase up to the time of delivery, with a sharp reduction in the postpartum period.21 Also, in pregnancy the sensitivity of uterine arteries to the vasodilator effects of endogenous CGRP is higher in comparison with uterine arteries from nonpregnant humans.22 In addition, we recently demonstrated that the coadministration of CGRP and L-NAME to pregnant rats prevented the gestational (but not postpartum) hypertension induced by L-NAME and significantly decreased fetal mortality.9 These data indicate that CGRP administration has beneficial effects on the hypertension and increased fetal mortality of experimental preeclampsia. Therefore, to determine the hemodynamic role of endogenous CGRP in this setting, we used the specific CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP8–37 in L-NAME-treated and control pregnant rats. In addition, we also quantified CGRP mRNA and iCGRP levels in DRG from these same groups of animals.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
Adult nulliparous pregnant rats (300 to 325 g) were purchased from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Houston, Tex) and were given free access to food and water. All procedures were approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Texas Medical Branch.

Induction of Preeclampsia Symptoms
Starting on day 17 of pregnancy (day 1 = day of positive sperm smear), osmotic minipumps (Alza Corp, model 2ML1) were implanted subcutaneously under halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories) anesthesia. The osmotic minipumps placed in the experimental groups of rats contained the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (Sigma Chemical Co; 50 mg/d per rat) dissolved in sterile saline solution, while the minipumps in the control groups were filled with vehicle only.

Hemodynamic Determination
Human {alpha}-CGRP8–37 was synthesized by one of the authors (S.J.W.) using standard solid-phase t-BOC chemistry, purified, and characterized by mass spectrometry, amino acid analysis, and sequencing. For the hemodynamic studies, groups (n = 3 to 4) of L-NAME-treated or control rats were studied on days 19, 20, and 21 of gestation and postpartum day 1. The rats that were studied postpartum all delivered on day 22, as expected. Following halothane anesthesia, the left carotid artery was cannulated to continuously measure MAP using a Gould pressure transducer coupled to a Gould recorder. The right jugular vein was also cannulated to administer either vehicle (saline) or CGRP8–37. The hemodynamic studies were then performed approximately 3 hours after the surgery with the rats in a fully awake and unrestrained state. At the end of each experiment, the animals were deeply anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (Fort Dodge Laboratories, Inc/Burns Veterinary Supply, Inc) via the cannulated jugular vein, and killed by decapitation. The thoracic and lumbar DRG from each rat were immediately dissected and frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent analysis of CGRP mRNA and iCGRP content. All of the dissected DRG from one side of the spinal cord in each animal were pooled and used for the RNA analysis, while the pooled DRG from the opposite side of the cord were used for peptide determination.

Hybridization Probes, RNA Isolation and Analysis, and Radioimmunoassay
The {alpha}-CGRP hybridization probe was 1.4-kb Sau3A rat genomic restriction fragment containing CGRP exons 5 and 6.10 The 18S rRNA hybridization probe was 1.15-kb BamHI-EcoRI restriction fragment of the mouse 18S rRNA gene.23 The DNA inserts were purified by agarose-gel electrophoresis and subsequently labeled with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP using a random hexanucleotide DNA labeling kit (Amersham). Total cellular RNA was isolated from the DRG tissue by the guanidine-isothiocyanate method.24 The RNA samples were fractionated by electrophoresis on denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gels and transferred to nylon membranes.25 The membranes were initially hybridized with the 32P-labeled CGRP DNA probe. As a control, the CGRP probe was removed from the membrane, which was then rehybridized with the 18S rDNA probe. Following hybridization, the membranes were washed and placed on a phosphor screen. The exposed screen was then placed in a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics), which generates an image of the hybridized RNA and quantifies the radioactivity in each hybridization signal.

To determine iCGRP levels in the DRG from the experimental and control rats, we used a commercially available rabbit anti-rat CGRP radioimmunoassay kit (Phoenix Pharmaceuticals).26 This antibody has 100% cross-reactivity with {alpha}-CGRP and 79% with rat ß-CGRP. There is no cross-reactivity with either rat amylin, calcitonin, somatostatin, or substance P. The total protein content in each sample was determined by the Bradford method (Bio-Rad).

Statistical Analysis
Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t test. The acceptable level of significance was P<.05. Data in the figures are depicted as the mean±SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamic Effects of CGRP8–37 in L-NAME-Induced Hypertension During Pregnancy
On days 19, 20, and 21 of gestation and postpartum day 1, groups of L-NAME-treated or control rats had arterial (for continuous MAP monitoring) and intravenous (for drug administration) catheters surgically placed and were studied in the conscious unrestrained state. As shown in Fig 1, baseline MAP was significantly higher in the L-NAME-treated compared with the control rats on gestational days 19 (153±7 versus 106±6 mm Hg, P<.01) and 21 (139±2 versus 107±11 mm Hg, P<.01) and post-partum day 1 (149±5 versus 118±2 mm Hg, P<.01). Baseline MAP was also higher on day 20 of gestation (131±16 versus 104±9 mm Hg) but did not achieve statistical significance.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. MAP determinations in the L-NAME-treated and control animals. Animals were instrumented for continuous MAP (mm Hg) recording on days 19, 20, and 21 (D19–D21) of pregnancy and postpartum day 1 (P1). The MAP values were determined with the rats in a fully awake and unrestrained state. MAP values are represented as the mean±SEM. *P<.01.

Administration of vehicle (0.1 mL saline IV) did not significantly change MAP in either group on days 19 to 21 of pregnancy or postpartum day 1. Similarly, administration of a bolus dose (100 µg in 0.1 mL saline IV) of CGRP8–37 did not significantly increase MAP in the control group at any of the four time points (Fig 2). However, administration of the CGRP receptor antagonist to the L-NAME-treated rats rapidly (the MAP increase began approximately 15 to 20 seconds after administration of CGRP8–37) induced a further increase of the already elevated MAP on day 19 (8±1 mm Hg, P<.05), 20 (12±2 mm Hg, P<.05), and 21 (7±1 mm Hg, P<.05) of gestation. The duration of the CGRP8–37-induced increase in MAP was relatively short (approximately 90 seconds). This transient effect of CGRP8–37 has been previously observed by us as well as other investigators who have used this antagonist in vivo and most likely reflects the rapid degradation of this peptide in the circulation.20,27,28 In contrast, the pressor activity of CGRP8–37 was not observed in the L-NAME-infused rats on postpartum day 1. These data indicate that in experimental preeclampsia, CGRP is playing a compensatory vasodilator role to lower the elevated BP and that this effect is attenuated after birth of the pups.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. CGRP8–37 increases MAP in the L-NAME-treated pregnant rats. Animals were instrumented for continuous MAP recording and CGRP8–37 administration on days 19, 20, and 21 (D19–D21) of pregnancy and postpartum day 1 (P1). With the animals in a fully awake and unrestrained state, bolus doses of 100 µg CGRP8–37 were given. Changes in MAP values are reported as the mean±SEM. *P<.05.

Analysis of CGRP mRNA and iCGRP Content in DRG From L-NAME-Treated and Control Pregnant Rats
In the DOC-salt model of hypertension, where CGRP also acts as a compensatory depressor, neuronal CGRP expression is significantly enhanced in the hypertensive rats when compared with the normotensive controls.19 Based on these results, we anticipated that a similar mechanism would be operative in the L-NAME-treated pregnant rats. Therefore, CGRP mRNA and iCGRP levels were quantified in the DRG taken from the rats used in the hemodynamic experiments described above.

Fig 3A is a representative Northern blot demonstrating the levels of both the 1.2-kb CGRP mRNA species (both {alpha}- and ß-CGRP) and 18S rRNA present in DRG RNA samples from three to four animals from each group at the four time points studied. The RNA samples from each animal were analyzed in a similar manner. PhosphorImager analysis was then performed to quantify the hybridization signals for CGRP mRNA and 18S rRNA that were used as an internal control for possible differences in loading of the RNA samples between the groups. As Fig 3B shows, when the values for the CGRP mRNA levels were normalized to those for 18S rRNA, there were no significant differences in DRG CGRP mRNA content between the L-NAME-treated and control pregnant rats at any of the time points studied.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. DRG CGRP mRNA content is not significantly altered in the L-NAME-treated pregnant rats. A, Total cellular RNA samples isolated from DRG taken from the L-NAME-treated and control rats on days 19, 20, and 21 (D19–D21) of pregnancy and postpartum day 1 (P1) were fractionated on a denaturing formaldehyde-agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane. The membrane was hybridized with the 32P-labeled CGRP genomic DNA insert (top). The CGRP probe was removed from the membrane, which was subsequently hybridized with the 32P-labeled 18S rDNA probe (bottom). Following hybridization with each probe, the membrane was washed and placed on a phosphor screen. The image in this figure was generated from the PhosphorImager analysis of the exposed screen. B, The CGRP mRNA/18S rRNA ratios from the L-NAME-treated (hatched bars) and control (open bars) DRGs were determined by PhosphorImager analysis of the Northern blot assays and are represented here as the fold increase over control (mean±SEM).

A CGRP specific radioimmunoassay was then used to determine iCGRP levels in the DRG from the same groups of rats. The iCGRP concentration in the L-NAME-treated groups during pregnancy and postpartum day 1 (range, 0.32±0.03 to 0.44±0.02 ng/mg protein) showed no significant difference when compared with control groups (0.31±0.07 to 0.37±0.04 ng/mg protein). The results from these experiments (Fig 4) are consistent with those from the RNA analysis and show no significant differences in neuronal iCGRP levels between any of the L-NAME-treated and control pregnant rats on the three consecutive days of pregnancy and postpartum day 1. These results indicate that the depressor effect of CGRP observed on days 19, 20, and 21 of pregnancy in the L-NAME-treated animals does not result from the enhanced neuronal expression of CGRP, as seen in the DOC-salt model, but is instead mediated through a yet unidentified mechanism.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. DRG iCGRP content is not significantly altered in the L-NAME-treated rats. A radioimmunoassay was used to determine DRG iCGRP levels from the L-NAME-treated (hatched bars) and control (open bars) animals on days 19 to 21 of pregnancy (D19–D21) and postpartum day 1 (P1). iCGRP content was quantified as pg iCGRP/µg protein, and the values are represented here as fold increase over control (mean±SEM).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In a previous study, we demonstrated that administration of CGRP can reverse the hypertension induced by L-NAME during pregnancy but not during the postpartum period. The results of the present study provide evidence that endogenous CGRP is also playing a hemodynamic role in this model of experimental preeclampsia. The CGRP8–37-induced increase of the already elevated MAP in the L-NAME-treated rats on days 19 to 21 of pregnancy indicates that in this setting, CGRP is acting as a compensatory vasodilator in an attempt to buffer the elevated BP. Interestingly, the pressor effect of the CGRP antagonist was attenuated on postpartum day 1, which is consistent with what we observed in our earlier studies using exogenously administered CGRP.

In light of the rapid onset of the hypertensive effect of CGRP8–37 in the L-NAME-treated pregnant rats, and because the antagonist probably does not penetrate the central nervous system, it is likely that the pressor activity of CGRP8–37 seen in these experiments results from a direct interaction of the antagonist with peripheral vascular CGRP receptors (probably CGRP receptor type 1 [CGRP1]).29 Support for this explanation is provided by radioligand binding and functional studies which show that CGRP8–37 is a competitive inhibitor of CGRP binding and that the CGRP1 receptor subtype displays the highest sensitivity to this antagonist.30,31 CGRP1 receptors are typified by those present in heart and peripheral blood vessels.29,30 Furthermore, a number of in vivo studies demonstrate that intravenous administration of CGRP8–37 results in a significant, reversible inhibition of the hypotensive and vasodilator effects of exogenously administered CGRP in the rat but does not affect the hypotensive action of other vasodilators such as bradykinin, histamine, or substance P.27,28,32 In other studies designed to investigate the CGRP-evoked increase in skin blood flow, CGRP8–37 was able to block the increased blood flow induced by administration of CGRP but had no effect on the vasodilator responses produced by vasoactive intestinal peptide or prostaglandin E1. Importantly, CGRP8–37 was also able to inhibit the increase in blood flow in response to capsaicin, an agent which stimulates the release of CGRP from sensory nerve terminals.33 This indicates that the CGRP antagonist can block the vasodilation that is induced in the skin by endogenously released CGRP. Taken together, these reports provide compelling evidence that the CGRP receptor antagonist can inhibit the vasodilation evoked by exogenously administered or endogenously released CGRP in vivo.

CGRP receptors appear to be coupled to G-proteins, and in a number of tissues, including vascular smooth muscle, CGRP acts through increases in cAMP.34,35 There is additional evidence that the vasodilator response evoked by CGRP is mediated in part by NO release and that various vascular beds differ in their degree of dependence on the presence of endothelium for the vasodilator effects of CGRP.36,37 Therefore, under conditions in which the NO generating system is intact, the depressor effects of CGRP appear to be partially mediated by endothelium-derived NO and also involve a direct relaxation of arteries by increasing cAMP. However, because NO synthesis is inhibited in the L-NAME-treated pregnant rats, it appears that the vasodilator effects of CGRP are independent of NO formation.9

As described previously, we recently demonstrated that CGRP plays a compensatory depressor role in DOC-salt-induced hypertension in the rat and that the mechanism underlying this effect was a significant enhancement of neuronal CGRP synthesis. In the present study, however, we did not observe any significant alterations in DRG CGRP mRNA or iCGRP content between the L-NAME-treated and control pregnant rats at any of the time points studied. However, we do not yet know whether neuronal CGRP expression is enhanced in the pregnant versus nonpregnant rats, since it has been shown that there is an increase in circulating iCGRP levels in human pregnancy. Based on these results, we postulate that in pregnancy there is a progesterone-mediated increase in the sensitivity of the vasculature to the vasodilator effects of CGRP and that this effect becomes more pronounced in the face of NO synthesis inhibition such that there is a CGRP-dependent decrease in systemic BP. Our reasons for believing this are as follows. First, it is well known that progesterone levels are significantly elevated during pregnancy and fall at term.1,38 In addition, we have found that in the rat, progesterone, but not estrogen, regulates vascular adaptations that occur during normal pregnancy and that progesterone can partially counteract the hypertension and fetal growth retardation produced by L-NAME.7 Second, Nelson et al22 showed that during pregnancy the sensitivity of the uterine arteries to endogenous CGRP is higher in comparison with nonpregnant human arteries. Therefore, we suggest that there is an increase in vascular responsiveness to CGRP during pregnancy that appears to be dependent on progesterone. However, the ability of CGRP8–37 to increase further the BP in the L-NAME-treated, but not control, rats in the absence of changes in CGRP levels indicate that this increased sensitivity to the vasodilator effects of CGRP is further enhanced in the absence of NO production, perhaps in an attempt to compensate for the loss of a potent depressor. The mechanism(s) that mediates this phenomenon is not known.

The inability of CGRP8–37 to alter BP in the control pregnant animals implies that CGRP does not play a major role in the regulation of systemic BP in the normotensive state but does not rule out a role for CGRP in the modulation of regional organ blood flows in this setting. In a recent report from other investigators, CGRP8–37 was used in studies of normal nonpregnant rats to show that CGRP is responsible for approximately 30% of basal coronary blood flow.39 Additional reports suggest that CGRP can modulate regional organ blood flows to critical organs without significant changes in systemic BP.11,12 Therefore, the enhanced sensitivity of uterine vessels to CGRP that is observed during pregnancy and the ability of exogenous CGRP to reverse the hypertension and attenuate the fetal death induced by L-NAME suggest that CGRP may play an important role in regulating the blood supply to the utero-placental unit and fetal development. Furthermore, the pressor effects of the CGRP antagonist that are seen in the L-NAME-treated rats indicate that in the face of inhibition of the NO-cGMP generating system, which is normally upregulated in the uterus during pregnancy and downregulated during labor,38 CGRP acts as a compensatory mechanism in an attempt to lower the BP and perhaps increase blood flow to the uterus.

In summary, these studies suggest that endogenous CGRP may play an important role in the regulation of BP and possibly placental perfusion in experimental preeclampsia. Further studies are required to clarify the role that CGRP plays in modulating regional organ blood flows in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia and to identify the mechanisms involved in the increase in CGRP-dependent vasodilation that is associated with L-NAME-induced hypertension in pregnancy.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors would like to thank Dr Richard Bukoski for a critical review of the manuscript and Rachel Stella for assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Roberts JM. Pregnancy related hypertension. In: Rubin PG, ed. Maternal-fetal Medicine: Principals and Practice. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1989: 777 –823.

2. Jovanovic A, Grbovic L, Tulic I. L-arginine induces relaxation of human uterine artery with both intact and denuded endothelium. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994; 256 : 103 –107.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Jovanovic A, Grbovic L, Tulic I. Predominant role for nitric oxide in the relaxation induced by acetylcholine in human uterine artery. Hum Reprod. 1994; 9 : 387 –393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Seligman SP, Buyon JP, Clancey RM, Young BK, Abramson SB. Role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171 : 944 –948.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Yallampalli C, Garfield RE. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis in rats during pregnancy produces symptoms identical to preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169 : 1316 –1320.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Molnar M, Suto T, Toth T, Hertelendy F. Prolonged blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in gravid rats produced sustained hypertension, proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170 : 1458 –1466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Buhimschi I, Yallampalli C, Chwalisz K, Garfield RE. Preeclampsia-like conditions produced by nitric oxide inhibition: effects of L-arginine, D-arginine, and steroid hormones. Hum Reprod. 1995; 10 : 2723 –2730.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Yallampalli C, Izumi H, Byam-Smith M, Garfield RE. An L-argininenitric oxide cyclic guanosine monophosphate system exists in the uterus and inhibits contractility during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 170 : 175 –185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Yallampalli C, Dong Y-L, Wimalawansa SJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide reverses the hypertension and significantly decreases the fetal mortality in preeclampsia rats induced by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester. Hum Reprod. 1996; 11 : 895 –899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Rosenfeld MG, Mermod JJ, Amara SG, Swanson LW, Sawchenko PE, Rivier J, Vale WW, Evans RM. Production of a novel neuropeptide encoded by the calcitonin gene via tissue-specific RNA processing. Nature. 1983; 304 : 129 –135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. DiPette D, Wimalawansa SJ. Cardiovascular actions of calcitonin gene-related peptide. In: Crass MF III. Avioli LV. eds. Calcitonin-Regulating Hormones and Cardiovascular Function. Ann Arbor, Mich: CRC Press; 1994: 239 –252.

12. McEwan J, Legon S, Wimalawansa SJ, Zaida M, Dollery CT, MacIntyre I. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: a review of its biology and relevance to the cardiovascular system. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, Kaplan NM, eds. Endocrine Mechanisms in Hypertension. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1989: 287 –306.

13. Gibson SJ, Polak MR, Bloom SR, Sabate IM, Mulderry PM, Evans RM, Rosenfeld MG. Calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the spinal cord of man and eight other species. J Neurosci. 1984; 12 : 3101 –3111.

14. Marti E, Gibson SJ, Polak MN, Facer P, Springall DR, Aswegen G, Aitchison M, Koltzenburg M. Ontogeny of peptide-and amine-containing neurones in motor, sensory and autonomic regions of rat and human spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia and rat skin. J Comp Neurol. 1987; 266 : 332 –359.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Asimakis GK, DiPette DJ, Conti VR, Holland OB, Zwischenberger JB. Hemodynamic action of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the siloated rat heart. Life Sci. 1987; 41 : 597 –603.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. DiPette DJ, Schwarzenberger K, Kerr N, Holland OB. Dose dependent systemic and regional hemodynamic effects of calcitonin generelated peptide. Am J Med Sci. 1989; 297 : 65 –70.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Westlund KN, DiPette DJ, Carson J, Holland OB. Decreased spinal cord content of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the spontaneously hypertension rat. Neurosci Lett. 1991; 131 : 183 –186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Supowit SC, Ramana CV, Westlund KN, DiPette DJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide gene expression in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 1993; 21 : 1010 –1014.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Supowit SC, Guraraj A, Ramana CV, Westlund KN, DiPette DJ. Enhanced neuronal expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide in miner-alcorticoid-salt hypertension. Hypertension. 1995; 25 : 1333 –1338.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. DiPette DJ, Zhao H, Hallman DM, Supowit SC. Calcitonin gene-related peptide is a depressor in DOC-salt hypertension. Hypertension. 1995; 26 : 556 .

21. Stevenson JC, MacDonald DWR, Warren RC Booker MW, White-head MI. Increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide during normal human pregnancy. Br Med J. 1986; 293 : 1329 –1330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Nelson SH, Steinsland OS, Suresh MS. Possible physiologic role of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the human uterine artery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168 : 605 –611.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Bowman LH, Rabin B, Schleisinger D. Multiple RNA cleavage pathways in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981; 9 : 4951 –4960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Chirgwin JM, Prezybyla AE, MacDonald AE, Rutter WJ. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched with ribonuclease. Biochemistry. 1977; 18 : 5294 –5299.

25. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989: 743 –752.

26. Supowit SC, Christensen MD, Westlund KN, Hallman DM, DiPette DJ. Dexamethasone and activators of the protein kinase A and C signal transduction pathways regulate neuronal calcitonin gene-related peptide expression and release. Brain Res. 1995; 686 : 77 –86.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Gardiner SM, Compton AM, Bennett T, Bose C, Foulkes R, Hughes B. Antagonistic effects of human {alpha}-CGRP8–37 on the in vivo regional hemodynamic action of human {alpha}-CGRP. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990; 171 : 938 –943.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Gardiner SM, Compton AM, Kemp PA, Bennett T, Bose C, Foulkes R, Hughes B. Human {alpha}-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-(8–37), but not -(28–37) inhibits carotid vasodilator effects of human CGRP in vivo. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991; 199 : 375 –378.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Gray GW, Marshall I, Bose C, Foulkes R, Hughes B. Subtypes of the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor in vascular tissues. Br J Pharmacol. 1991; 102 : 189 –194.

30. Quirion R, Van Rossum D, Dumont Y, St-Pierre S, Fournier A. Characterization of CGRP1 and CGRP2 receptor subtypes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991; 657 : 88 –105.

31. Guiliani S, Wimalawansa SJ, Maggie CA. Involvement of multiple receptors in the biological effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide and amylin in rat and guinea-pig preparations. Br J Pharmacol. 1992; 107 : 510 –514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Donoso MV, Fournier A, St Pierre S, Huidobra-Toro JP. Pharmacological characterization of CGRP receptor subtype in the vascular system of the rat: studies with hCGRP fragments and analogues. Peptides. 1990; 11 : 885 –890.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Hughes SR, Brain SP. A calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonist (CGRP8–37) inhibits microvascular response induced by CGRP and capsaicin in skin. Br J Pharmacol. 1991; 104 : 748 –742.

34. Wimalawansa SJ. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors: characterization, species distribution, and receptor subtypes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994; 72 : 29 –39.

35. Kubota M, Moseley JM, Botera L, Dusting DJ, MacDonald PS, Martin TS. Calcitonin gene-related peptide stimulates cAMP in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1985; 132 : 88 –94.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Abdelrahman A, Wang YX, Chang SD, Pang CCY. Mechanisms of the vasodilator action of calcitonin gene-related peptide in conscious rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1992; 106 : 45 –48.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Grace GC, Dusting GJ, Kemp BE, Martin TJ. Endothelium and the vasodilatory action of rat calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Br J Pharmacol. 1987; 91 : 729 –733.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Yallampalli C, Byam-Smith M, Nelson SO, Garfield RE. Steroid hormones modulate the production of nitric oxide and cGMP in the rat uterus. Endocrinology. 1994; 134 : 1971 –1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Yaoita H, Sato E, Kawaguchi M, Saiko M, Maruyama Y. Nonad-renergic noncholinergic nerves regulate basal coronary flow via release of capsaicin-sensitive neuropeptides in the rat heart. Circ Res. 1994; 75 : 780 –788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. C. Supowit, R. T. Ethridge, H. Zhao, K. A. Katki, and D. J. DiPette
Calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P contribute to reduced blood pressure in sympathectomized rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1169 - H1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. C. Bowers, K. A. Katki, A. Rao, M. Koehler, P. Patel, A. Spiekerman, D. J. DiPette, and S. C. Supowit
Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Hypertension-Induced Renal Damage
Hypertension, July 1, 2005; 46(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. C. Supowit, A. Rao, M. C. Bowers, H. Zhao, G. Fink, B. Steficek, P. Patel, K. A. Katki, and D. J. DiPette
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Protects Against Hypertension-Induced Heart and Kidney Damage
Hypertension, January 1, 2005; 45(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Yallampalli, S.B. Kondapaka, P. Lanlua, S.J. Wimalawansa, and P.R.R. Gangula
Female Sex Steroid Hormones and Pregnancy Regulate Receptors for Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Rat Mesenteric Arteries, but Not in Aorta
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
J. Martinez-Orgado, R. Gonzalez, M. J. Alonso, and M. Salaices
Impairment of Fetal Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in a Rat Model of Preeclampsia by Chronic Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2004; 11(2): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y.-L. Dong, S. Vegiraju, M. Chauhan, P. R. R. Gangula, G. D. V. Hankins, L. Goodrum, and C. Yallampalli
Involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide in control of human fetoplacental vascular tone
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2004; 286(1): H230 - H239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P.R.R. Gangula, C. Thota, S.J. Wimalawansa, R.D. Bukoski, and C. Yallampalli
Mechanisms Involved in Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide-Induced Relaxation in Pregnant Rat Uterine Artery
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1635 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
S. Morrison, D. S Gardner, A. J W Fletcher, M. R Bloomfield, and D. A Giussani
Enhanced nitric oxide activity offsets peripheral vasoconstriction during acute hypoxaemia via chemoreflex and adrenomedullary actions in the sheep fetus
J. Physiol., February 15, 2003; 547(1): 283 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
J. Martinez-Orgado, R. Gonzalez, S. Tovar, J. Marin, M. Salaices, and M. J. Alonso
Administration of N{omega}-L-Arginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) Impairs Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation in Gravid But Not Nongravid Rats
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2003; 10(2): 74 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Lanlua, R.D. Bukoski, S.J. Wimalawansa, and C. Yallampalli
Effects of Pregnancy and Female Sex Steroid Hormones on Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Content of Mesenteric Artery in Rats
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1430 - 1434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P.R.R. Gangula, Y.L. Dong, S.J. Wimalawansa, and C. Yallampalli
Infusion of Pregnant Rats with Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP)8-37, a CGRP Receptor Antagonist, Increases Blood Pressure and Fetal Mortality and Decreases Fetal Growth
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 624 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. Katki, S. C. Supowit, and D. J. DiPette
Substance P in Subtotal Nephrectomy-Salt Hypertension
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 389 - 393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Lanlua, P.R.R. Gangula, G. Taglialatela, and C. Yallampalli
Gestational Changes in Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Nerve Growth Factor, and Its Receptors in Rat Dorsal Root Ganglia
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1601 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. A. Katki, S. C. Supowit, and D. J. DiPette
Role Of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Substance P in Dahl-Salt Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 679 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
C. Fernandez-Patron, K. G. Stewart, Y. Zhang, E. Koivunen, M. W. Radomski, and S. T. Davidge
Vascular Matrix Metalloproteinase-2-Dependent Cleavage of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Promotes Vasoconstriction
Circ. Res., October 13, 2000; 87(8): 670 - 676.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.R.R. Gangula, S.J. Wimalawansa, and C. Yallampalli
Pregnancy and sex steroid hormones enhance circulating calcitonin gene-related peptide concentrations in rats
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2000; 15(4): 949 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P.R.R. Gangula, P. Lanlua, S. Wimalawansa, S. Supowit, D. DiPette, and C. Yallampalli
Regulation of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Expression in Dorsal Root Ganglia of Rats by Female Sex Steroid Hormones
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2000; 62(4): 1033 - 1039.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. R. R. Gangula, H. Zhao, S. C. Supowit, S. J. Wimalawansa, D. J. Dipette, K. N. Westlund, R. F. Gagel, and C. Yallampalli
Increased Blood Pressure in {alpha}-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide/Calcitonin Gene Knockout Mice
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 470 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Grewal, J. Cuevas, G. Chaudhuri, and L. Nathan
Effects of calcitonin gene-related peptide on vascular resistance in rats: role of sex steroids
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 1999; 276(6): H2063 - H2068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. R. R. Gangula, H. Zhao, S. Supowit, S. Wimalawansa, D. DiPette, and C. Yallampalli
Pregnancy and steroid hormones enhance the vasodilation responses to CGRP in rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 1999; 276(1): H284 - H288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gangula, P. R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gangula, P. R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.