Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1997;29:408-413

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elijovich, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elijovich, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D. H.

(Hypertension. 1997;29:408.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


State-of-the-Art-Lecture

Regulation of Growth of the Adrenal Gland in DOC-Salt Hypertension

Role of Angiotensin II Receptor Subtypes

Fernando Elijovich; Hua-Wei Zhao; Cheryl L. Laffer; Yong Du; Donald J. DiPette; Tadashi Inagami; Donna H. Wang

From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (Galveston), and the Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (T.I.).

Correspondence to Fernando Elijovich, MD, 2-26 Former Shriners Burns Institute, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX 77555-0829. E-mail felijovi{at}impol.utmb.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
To investigate the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of adrenal growth in deoxycorticosterone (DOC)-salt hypertensive rats, and the adrenal gene expression of angiotensin AT1 and AT2 receptors, three groups of uninephrectomized rats+DOC pellet+0.9% NaCl were given water (DOC), losartan (DOC-L), or ramipril (DOC-R) by gavage. Controls had sham surgery and water gavage. Tail-cuff systolic and mean intra-arterial blood pressures were significantly higher in the three DOC groups than in controls and not different among the groups. Adrenal weight of DOC was slightly but not significantly greater than that of controls, while those of DOC-L and DOC-R were greater than that of controls (P<.01). Northern blots showed that AT1 and AT2 gene expression was significantly reduced in DOC (by 33% and 60%), while that of AT1 (but not AT2) was significantly reduced further (versus control and DOC) in DOC-L and DOC-R. There were negative correlations between adrenal weight and AT1 (r=-.80, P<.0001) or AT2 (r=-.60, P<.005). We conclude that DOC-salt hypertension downregulates adrenal AT1 and AT2 gene expression by different mechanisms. Removal of the effects of angiotensin by losartan or ramipril downregulates AT1 further and promotes adrenal growth, indicating the presence of an AT1-mediated growth-inhibitory action of angiotensin II on the adrenal gland. These observations constitute an additional example of a growth-inhibitory role for the AT1 receptor, opposite to its more common growth-promoting actions in other organs and tissues.


Key Words: receptors, angiotensin II • gene expression regulation • blotting, Northern • losartan • ramipril • deoxycorticosterone • rats

Abbreviations: AT1, AT2 = angiotensin receptor subtype 1, 2 • DOC = deoxycorticosterone • GRE = glucocorticoid responsive element • MAP = mean arterial pressure


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The circulating renin-angiotensin system has long been known to regulate vasoconstriction and aldosterone secretion, thus participating in blood pressure control and fluid homeostasis. Over the last few years, it has become apparent that local tissue renin-angiotensin systems play a major role in the regulation of growth processes. These effects have been described in tissues that are involved either in the pathogenesis or in the target organ damage of hypertension, eg, vascular smooth muscle,1 cardiomyocytes,2 mesangium,3 endothelium,4 and neointima of injured vessels.5

The actions of angiotensin II are exerted via activation of cell surface receptors. The development of specific nonpeptide antagonists for angiotensin II and their use in pharmacological and radioligand binding experiments have permitted characterization of distinct receptor subtypes for this pressor peptide. More recently, molecular probes for the study of receptor gene expression6,7 and experiments with gene transfection8 have been used to study the role of these receptor subtypes in mediating the actions of angiotensin II. The hemodynamic and aldosterone secretion effects of angiotensin II are mediated by the AT1 receptor.9,10 Regarding the effects on cell growth, the prevailing view is that the AT1 receptor mediates the growth-promoting, while the AT2 receptor mediates the opposing, antiproliferative actions of angiotensin II.11,8 However, not all available evidence supports this view. For example, AT1 blockade by losartan does not prevent aortic hypertrophy and fibrosis during angiotensin II-induced hypertension in the rat.12 In contrast, AT2 blockade by specific antagonists inhibits aortic hypertrophy and fibrosis in this model. Also, AT2 blockade prevents neointimal growth after carotid artery injury in the rat.13 These observations indicate the presence of growth-promoting actions for the AT2 receptor.

The adrenal gland expresses the genes encoding both AT1 and AT2 receptors throughout fetal and adult life,14,15 with the former predominating in the cortex and the latter in the medulla. In bovine adrenocortical cells in culture, angiotensin II has potent mitogenic effects16,17 and induces expression of proto-oncogenes,18 both effects via the AT1 receptor. In vivo, it has been reported that the adrenal glands of rats with experimental DOC-salt hypertension sustain weight reduction,19 a change that is prevented by administration of angiotensin I.20 The role of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in these effects of the renin-angiotensin system on adrenal growth has not been explored in this model.

The aims of this study were threefold: (1) to examine the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of the changes in growth of the adrenal gland induced by DOC-salt hypertension, (2) to define the specific pathways (AT1 versus AT2 receptor-mediated) responsible for these growth processes, and (3) to assess the effects of DOC-salt hypertension, with or without blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, on the gene expression of AT1 and AT2 receptors in the adrenal gland. We used the converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril and the AT1 receptor blocker losartan for pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system and measured expression of angiotensin II receptor subtypes, AT1 and AT2, in the adrenal glands of DOC-salt rats. Plasma renin is low in DOC-salt rats 3 weeks after induction of hypertension21 and pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system does not modify blood pressure.21,22 Under these conditions, the effects of ramipril and losartan on organ growth can be predominantly attributed to changes in local tissue angiotensin II, and more importantly, they are devoid of the confounding influence of changes in blood pressure by these agents.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Treatment Groups
Five-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats (Harlan Inc), weighing between 140 and 170 g, were randomly divided into four groups (n=7 each). Animals were anesthetized with a single intraperitoneal injection of 80 mg/kg ketamine and 0.2 mg/kg xylazine. Three groups were subjected to left nephrectomy and implantation of a DOC pellet (150 mg, Innovative Research) in the back of the neck, while the control group had sham nephrectomy. After recovery from surgery, the rats in the three DOC groups were given 0.9% NaCl and 0.2% KCl to drink ad libitum, while the controls were given tap water. In addition, animals were given water (0.5 to 1 mL) via oral gavage, once a day for 3 weeks, containing either losartan (10 mg/kg per day, DOC-L group), ramipril (10 mg/kg per day, DOC-R group), or no added drugs in the DOC-treated (DOC group) and in control (C group) animals. At the end of the 21-day treatment period, all rats were anesthetized as above, and the left carotid artery was catheterized for the measurement of MAP with a Statham 231D pressure transducer coupled to a Gould 2400s recorder (Gould Inc). MAP responses to bolus injections of angiotensin I (50 ng/kg) and angiotensin II (50 ng/kg) were assessed in all four groups of rats to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment with ramipril and losartan.13 All animal procedures were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Body Weight and Systolic Blood Pressure
Body weight was recorded at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Indirect tail-cuff systolic blood pressures were routinely measured in conscious rats every 3 to 4 days for 21 days beginning 1 day before surgery. A Narco Bio-Systems Electro-Sphygmomanometer was used for these measurements. The blood pressure value for each rat in each session was the average of three consecutive measurements.

Adrenal Weights and Tissue Preparation
After recording of intra-arterial MAP and measurement of the pressor effects of angiotensin I and II, the animals were killed by further injection of the anesthetic agents. A midline abdominal incision was made for removal of the adrenal glands. The periadrenal fat was carefully dissected, and the glands were weighed in an analytical scale (Sartorius, Brinkmann Instruments Co; precision, 0.1 mg) and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for storage at -80°C. The adrenal glands from 5 rats in each group were used to extract RNA for Northern blot analysis.

cDNA Probes
A 0.8-kb fragment (-178 to +562) from the coding region of rat AT1A cDNA23 was used as a template to make AT1 probes. A 1.23-kb fragment (+16 to +1249) from the coding region of rat AT2 cDNA24 was used as a template to make AT2 probes. All probes were labeled with [32P]deoxycytidine triphosphate (Amersham) by use of a random primer DNA labeling system (Amersham). Unincorporated nucleotides were separated using a G-50 spin column (Worthington).

Northern Blots
Total adrenal RNA was extracted using the guanidine thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction protocol.25 Electrophoresis of 20 µg denatured RNA was carried out in a 1% agarose gel containing 2.2 mol/L formaldehyde. RNA was transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Fisher Co). The membrane was baked at 80°C for 2 hours in a vacuum oven (Fisher Co), and the blot was prehybridized for 5 hours at 42°C in hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 5x Denhardt’s solution, 5x SSC, 0.5% SDS, and 200 µg/mL denatured salmon sperm DNA), followed by hybridization with the 32P-labeled probes for 18 to 20 hours at 42°C. At the end of this period, the blot was washed successively in 2x, 1x, and 0.5x SSC (two times, 10 minutes each) containing 0.1% SDS at 65°C. To control for differences in RNA loading, Northern blots were incubated at 90°C for 10 minutes in 20 mmol/L tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane HCl (pH 8.0) to strip off the cDNA probes and later rehybridized with a 32P-labeled 18S rRNA probe. Autoradiograms were made using XAR-5 x-ray film (Eastman Kodak Co) and an intensifying screen. Autoradiographic signals were scanned with a laser densitometer (Ultrascan XL Laser Densitometer). Results of relative gene expression are expressed as the ratios of AT1 mRNA and AT2 mRNA to 18S rRNA.

Statistical Analysis
Results are given as mean±SEM. The significance of changes in a variable from the beginning to the end of the study was assessed with paired Student’s t tests. The significance of differences between groups was assessed by ANOVA followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. Relationships between variables were assessed by single linear regression analysis. All analyses were run with the JMP (version 3.0.2) statistical package of the SAS Institute Inc. A value of P<.05 was used to reject the null hypothesis (ie, no difference between means or no relationship between variables).


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Initial body weight was not significantly different among the four groups of rats (Table). All animals gained weight over the 3-week course of the experiment. However, the weight gain of the three groups treated with DOC was significantly less than that in controls. There was no difference in body weight gain between DOC, DOC-L, and DOC-R, indicating that blockade of the renin-angiotensin system did not have an effect on this parameter. At the end of the study, the three groups of DOC rats had body weights that did not differ among them but were all significantly less than that in controls (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Body Weight of Rats at Beginning and End of Treatment

Tail-cuff systolic blood pressures of the DOC, DOC-L, and DOC-R groups were significantly higher than those of controls beginning on days 3, 3, and 7, respectively. Over the remainder of the experiment, systolic blood pressure of the three DOC groups rose similarly (Fig 1). At the end of the experiment, the values for the four groups were controls, 139±4; DOC, 215±8; DOC-L, 226±7; and DOC-R, 223±7 mm Hg (F-42.4, P<.0001, Tukey: all DOC groups higher than controls and not different between them). On day 21, MAP under anesthesia exhibited the same pattern (controls, 98±1; DOC, 131±3; DOC-L, 126±7; and DOC-R, 126±4 mm Hg; F=9.7, P<.001, Tukey: same as that for tail cuff). Therefore, neither losartan nor ramipril prevented the increase in blood pressure produced by the combined treatment with DOC and salt in uninephrectomized rats, confirming that angiotensin II is not necessary for the development of hypertension in this model.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. Tail-cuff systolic blood pressures in controls (C, {circ}), DOC hypertensive rats (DOC, •), DOC given losartan (DOC-L, {blacksquare}), and DOC given ramipril (DOC-R, {blacktriangleup}). Values are mean±SEM; n=7 rats per group. *DOC and DOC-L significantly higher than C; {dagger}all three DOC groups significantly higher than C.

MAP responses to bolus injections of angiotensin I (50 ng/kg) were significantly smaller in DOC (26±4 mm Hg) than in controls (41±2), perhaps due to decreased lung angiotensin-converting enzyme levels in DOC.26 Responses to angiotensin I in DOC-L (3±2) and DOC-R (3±2) were markedly diminished and significantly smaller than those in controls and DOC. Responses to angiotensin II (50 ng/kg) were not different among controls (49±2), DOC (44±7), and DOC-R (41±4), while those of DOC-L were significantly decreased (10±4). These data confirm effective AT1 receptor blockade by losartan and inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme by ramipril.

Fig 2 shows that the weight of the adrenal gland of DOC-rats (177±14 µg/g body wt) was slightly but not significantly greater than that of controls (131±13). In contrast, the DOC-L (209±18) and DOC-R (236±15) groups exhibited significantly higher adrenal weights than controls, but they were not different between DOC-L and DOC-R. Thus, we found that losartan and ramipril promoted enlargement of the adrenal gland, suggesting the presence of a growth-inhibitory action of angiotensin II on this organ.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Weight of the adrenal glands, expressed per gram of body weight in control rats (C), DOC hypertensive rats (DOC), DOC given losartan (DOC-L), and DOC given ramipril (DOC-R). The results are expressed as mean±SEM; n=7 rats per group. *Significantly higher than C.

AT1 and AT2 mRNA levels in the adrenal glands were determined by Northern blot analysis in the four experimental groups (Fig 3A). Blots were then stripped and rehybridized to 18S mRNA probes. Densitometric analysis indicated that the AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA ratios differed in the four groups (F=19.9, P<.0001, Fig 3B). AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA ratio of DOC (1.07±0.06) was significantly lower than that in controls (1.61±0.16), a decrease of 33%. In DOC-L (0.67±0.05) and DOC-R (0.74±0.07), AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA ratios were further diminished, signif icantly differing from those of DOC and controls. AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA ratios were also different among the four groups (F=12.0, P<.0002, Fig 3C). AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA ratio of DOC (0.82±0.08) was significantly lower than that in controls (2.02±0.28), a decrease of 60%. AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA ratios of DOC-L (0.63±0.08) and DOC-R (0.73±0.22) were also significantly lower than that in controls but not significantly decreased from that of DOC.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. A, Photograph showing Northern blot analysis of adrenal AT1 and AT2 mRNA and 18S rRNA in control rats (C), DOC hypertensive rats (DOC), DOC given losartan (DOC-L), and DOC given ramipril (DOC-R). B, Densitometric data in which AT1 mRNA levels were normalized by 18S rRNA in each of the four groups. The results are expressed as mean±SEM; n=5 rats per group. *All three DOC groups significantly less than C; {dagger}DOC-L and DOC-R significantly less than DOC. C, Densitometric data on AT2 mRNA levels normalized by 18S rRNA. Data given as in 3B. {ddagger}Significantly different from C and not significantly different among the three DOC groups.

There were no correlations between adrenal AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA or AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA ratios and blood pressures (tail cuff or intra-arterial) in control or DOC-treated animals. In contrast, significant negative correlations were detected, for all animals analyzed together, between the weight of the adrenals (normalized per gram of body weight) and the AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA (r= -.80, P<.0001) or AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA (r=-.60, P<.005) ratios, Fig 4.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 4. Relationships between weight of the adrenal glands (expressed per gram of body weight) and adrenal AT1 mRNA/18S rRNA ratio (left) and AT2 mRNA/18S rRNA ratio (right) in rats of all experimental groups combined (n=20). Regression lines are indicated. Statistics are given in the text.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Most reports suggest that the growth-promoting and antiproliferative actions of angiotensin II are exerted via its AT1 and AT2 receptors, respectively.8,11 However, there are exceptions for both these subtypes in vascular tissues.12,13 In adrenocortical cells in culture, AT1 stimulates proto-oncogene expression18 and mediates proliferative effects.17 No action has been described, either on growth-promoting or inhibiting processes, for AT2 in these in vitro preparations.

The DOC-salt rat is an ideal model for the in vivo study of regulation of adrenal growth by the renin-angiotensin system because plasma renin is profoundly suppressed during the early stages of the hypertension,21 while the components of the tissue renin-angiotensin system are still detectable in several organs,27–29 including expression of renin mRNA in the adrenal gland.30 Therefore, we speculated that this model would permit investigation of the effects of ramipril and losartan on adrenal growth via actions on the local adrenal renin-angiotensin system and without the confounding effects of changes in blood pressure.

We confirmed that neither ramipril nor losartan modified the development of hypertension in our DOC-salt rats, as reported previously with other converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers.21,22 In this regard, the DOC-salt model is unique among low-renin models of experimental hypertension. Rats subjected to partial renal ablation and Dahl-S rats given salt also develop hypertension with decreased plasma renin, but they exhibit blood pressure reduction in response to converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonists.31–33

It has been reported that the adrenal gland of DOC-salt rats sustains a decrease in weight during the development of hypertension,19 a change that is prevented by coadministration of angiotensin I.20 We could not confirm these observations in our DOC-salt rats. They actually sustained a mild increase (albeit not statistically significant) in adrenal weight compared with controls. In one of the previous publications, adrenal weights were not normalized to body weights,19 and in the other, there were methodological differences with our experiments (Wistar rats instead of Sprague Dawley, and repeated subcutaneous injections of DOC instead of pellet implantation).20 We cannot speculate whether these differences account for the conflicting results.

The major findings of our experiments can be summarized as follows: (1) DOC-rats without pharmacological blockade of the renin-angiotensin system exhibited significantly reduced expression of AT1 and AT2 genes in the adrenal gland compared with controls; (2) losartan and ramipril decreased AT1 (but not AT2) gene expression further, beyond the decrease observed in untreated DOC-rats; (3) in all DOC-rats and controls, analyzed together, there were inverse relationships between the weight of the adrenal glands and AT1 or AT2 gene expression; and (4) both losartan and ramipril produced a significant enlargement of the adrenal glands. Taken together, these observations suggest that angiotensin II exerts a tonic growth-inhibitory effect on the adrenal gland, which is mediated by the AT1 receptor (increased adrenal weight by losartan) and perhaps also by AT2 (inverse relationship between AT2 and adrenal weight), although confirmation of the latter would require the use of specific AT2 antagonists. Decreases in the expression of these receptors, of the magnitude observed in DOC-salt rats, were not enough to produce a statistically significant enlargement of the adrenal gland in the small group of animals studied. In contrast, with further decrease in expression of the AT1 gene by losartan and ramipril, there was significant enlargement of the adrenal gland, which was possibly enhanced by diminished action of angiotensin II on AT1 (losartan) or by decreased tissue generation of this peptide (ramipril).

It is unlikely that downregulation of AT1 or AT2 was due to DOC because (1) only the glucocorticoid receptor regulates angiotensin receptor gene expression,34 (2) a GRE is only present in the gene for the AT1A receptor subtype, and (3) binding of the glucocorticoid receptor to this GRE stimulates gene transcription,34 which is not consistent with diminished receptor expression observed in our DOC-salt rats.

Opposing effects of nephrectomy on adrenal angiotensin receptor binding have been described. Upregulation was attributed by some to high serum potassium,35 which is consistent with upregulation of adrenal AT1 mRNA and protein by high potassium diet in normal rats.36 Others have attributed observed downregulation of receptor binding37 and receptor mRNA38 to decreased angiotensin II. Although those results were obtained in anephric, not uninephrectomized, rats, they are applicable to interpretation of our findings. It is conceivable that low serum potassium and low circulating angiotensin contributed to downregulation of adrenal angiotensin II receptors in DOC-salt rats.

The most likely factor responsible for adrenal downregulation of both AT1 and AT2 in DOC-salt rats is high sodium intake, perhaps enhanced by the salt-retaining properties of DOC. In normal rats, adrenal angiotensin II immunoreactivity and angiotensin receptor binding correlate closely and are diminished by a high salt diet.39 An effect of high salt diet on angiotensin gene expression has not been reported, but low-sodium diet upregulates adrenal AT1A and AT1B receptor mRNA,40 AT2 ligand binding,10 and AT1 receptor protein.36 Captopril36 and losartan41 prevent the effects of low-salt diet, indicating that adrenal angiotensin receptor upregulation is due to increased angiotensin II by sodium deprivation. This has been confirmed by direct demonstration of adrenal angiotensin receptor upregulation by infusion of angiotensin II.38 These findings make it likely that suppression of circulating and/ or tissue angiotensin II by high salt diet and DOC was the major factor determining downregulation of AT1 and AT2 in our DOC-salt rats. They are also consistent with further reduction of AT1 expression by administration of losartan or ramipril to these animals. Although ours is the first report in DOC-salt rats, others have shown downregulation of adrenal AT1 but not AT2 by losartan,42 of both AT1 and AT2 by lisinopril,42 and of the AT1A and AT1B subtypes by delapril.43 In the present experiment, losartan and ramipril downregulated the AT1 receptor beyond the decrease produced by DOC-salt. In contrast, downregulation of AT2 by DOC-salt was not augmented by these compounds. This difference could be due to the more profound downregulation of AT2 by DOC-salt, compared with AT1, which may have made it more difficult to detect further changes in AT2 mRNA after blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. It is also possible that downregulation of AT1 by high salt-diet is dependent on withdrawal of angiotensin II or of its action, while that of AT2 reflects an angiotensin-independent action of sodium. We do not have data to support either possibility.

An additional factor, norepinephrine stimulation of alpha-1 adrenoceptors, may contribute to downregulation of adrenal AT1 in DOC-salt rats. These animals exhibit exaggerated norepinephrine release into the synaptic cleft, with spillover to the circulation.44 In normal rats, prazosin enhances expression of adrenal AT1A and AT1B, demonstrating an alpha-1 inhibitory action of norepinephrine on gene expression of AT1 receptor subtypes.45

Regardless of its mechanisms, downregulation of adrenal expression of angiotensin II receptors has been now described in three models of experimental hypertension. Adrenal AT1B mRNA (but not AT1A) is decreased by 50% in Goldblatt two-kidney, one clip hypertension of Wistar rats,40 adrenal AT1 by 66% in hypertensive rats due to reduced renal mass and high sodium intake,32 and adrenal AT1 by 33% and AT2 by 60% in DOC-salt rats in the present experiment. These models encompass the full spectrum of plasma renin activity or renin dependence of blood pressure and differ in the mechanisms of their hypertension. This suggests that downregulation of adrenal angiotensin receptor genes may play an as yet unknown compensatory role in experimental hypertension. In contrast, in spontaneously hypertensive rats, adrenal AT1 receptors are more abundant than in Wistar-Kyoto controls,14 suggesting that alterations in angiotensin receptor gene expression may play a pathogenic rather than a compensatory role in genetic hypertension.

In conclusion, we have shown that DOC-salt hypertension in the rat exhibits downregulation of adrenal expression of AT1 and AT2. In the case of AT1, this downregulation seems to follow the same pattern as in normal rats, ie, it is most likely dependent on removal of the action of angiotensin II by salt and DOC. A role for angiotensin in downregulation of adrenal AT2 mRNA was not demonstrated by these experiments. We also show that downregulation of these receptors by DOC-salt hypertension seems to withdraw a growth-inhibitory influence that angiotensin II exerts on the adrenal gland. This becomes more apparent after more profound downregulation of the AT1 (not the AT2) receptor by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. The effect of losartan on adrenal weight makes it unequivocal that the AT1 receptor mediates the growth-inhibitory action of angiotensin II on the adrenal gland, providing another example of an exception to the usual growth-promoting effects of this receptor.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant HL-52279 (Dr Wang). We thank DuPont Merck Pharmaceuticals and the Upjohn Co for providing losartan and ramipril.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lyall F, Dornan ES, McQueen J, Boswell F, Kelly M. Angiotensin II increases proto-oncogene expression and phosphoinositide turnover in vascular smooth muscle cells via the angiotensin II AT1 receptor. J Hypertens. 1992; 10 : 1463 –1469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Kojima M, Shiojima I, Yamazaki T, Komuro I, Yunzeng Z, Ying W, Mizuno T, Ueki K, Tobe K, Kadowaki T, Nagai R, Yazaki Y. Angiotensin II receptor antagonist TCV-116 induces regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy in vivo and inhibits the intra-cellular signaling pathway of stretch-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro. Circulation. 1994; 89 : 2204 –2211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Ray PE, Bruggeman LA, Horikoshi S, Aguilera G, Klotman PE. Angiotensin II stimulates human fetal mesangial cell proliferation and fibronectin biosynthesis by binding to AT1 receptors. Kidney Int. 1994; 45 : 177 –184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Feener EP, Northrup JM, Aiello LP, King GL. Angiotensin II induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and -2 expression in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95 : 1353 –1362.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Janiak P, Libert O, Vilaine JP. Role of the renin-angiotensin system in neointima formation after injury in rabbits. Hypertension. 1994; 24 : 671 –678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Sasaki K, Yamano Y, Bardhan S, Iwai N, Murray JJ, Hasegawa M, Matsuda Y, Inagami T. Cloning and expression of a complementary DNA encoding a bovine adrenal angiotensin II type-1 receptor. Nature. 1991; 351 : 230 –233.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Tsuzuki S, Ichiki T, Nakakubo H, Kitami Y, Guo DF, Shirai H, Inagami T. Molecular cloning and expression of the gene encoding human angiotensin II type 2 receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994; 200 : 1449 –1454.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Nakajima M, Hutchinson HG, Fujinaga M, Hayashida W, Morishita R, Zhang L, Horiuchi M, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. The angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor antagonizes the growth effects of the AT1 receptor: gain-of-function study using gene transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995; 92 : 10663 –10667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Smits GJ, Koepke JP, Blaine EH. Reversal of low-dose angiotensin hypertension by angiotensin receptor antagonists. Hypertension. 1991; 18 : 17 –21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Aguilera G. Role of angiotensin II receptor subtypes on the regulation of aldosterone secretion in the adrenal glomerulosa zone in the rat. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1992; 90 : 53 –60.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Inagami T, Yamano Y, Bardhan S, Chaki S, Guo DF, Ohyama K, Kambayashi Y, Takahashi K, Ichiki T, Tsuzuki S, Tang H. Cloning, expression and regulation of angiotensin II receptors. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1995; 377 : 311 –317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Levy BI, Benessiano J, Henrion D, Caputo L, Heymes C, Duriez M, Poitevin P, Samuel JL. Chronic blockade of AT2-subtype receptors prevents the effect of angiotensin II on the rat vascular structure. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98 : 418 –425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Janiak P, Pillon A, Prost JF, Vilaine JP. Role of angiotensin subtype 2 receptor in neointima formation after vascular injury. Hypertension. 1992; 20 : 737 –745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Song K, Kurobe Y, Kanehara H, Okunishi H, Wada T, Inada Y, Nishikawa K, Miyazaki M. Quantitative localization of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Blood Press Suppl. 1994; 5 : 21 –26.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Shanmugam S, Llorens-Cortes C, Clauser E, Corvol P, Gasc JM. Expression of angiotensin II AT2 receptor mRNA during development of rat kidney and adrenal gland. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268 : F922 –F930.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Natarajan R, Gonzales N, Hornsby PJ, Nadler J. Mechanism of angiotensin II-induced proliferation in bovine adrenocortical cells. Endocrinology. 1992; 131 : 1174 –1180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Tian Y, Balla T, Baukal AJ, Catt KJ. Growth responses to angiotensin II in bovine adrenal glomerulosa cells. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268 : E135 –E144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Viard I, Jaillard C, Ouali R, Saez JM. Angiotensin-II-induced expression of proto-oncogene (c-fos, jun-B and c-jun) mRNA in bovine adrenocortical fasciculata cells (BAC) is mediated by AT-1 receptors. FEBS Lett. 1992; 313 : 43 –46.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Brownie AC, Gallant S, Nickerson PA, Joseph LM. The occurrence of 11-deoxycorticosterone (DOC)-induced hypertension in the Long-Evans rat. Endocr Res Commun. 1978; 5 : 71 –80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Watanabe M, Honda M, Soma M, Minato M, Fukuda N, Watanabe Y, Izumi Y, Hatano M. Preventive effect of angiotensin I on weight reduction in the adrenal glands of DOCA/salt hypertensive rats. Endocrinol Jpn. 1990; 37 : 521 –528.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Wada T, Kanagawa R, Ishimura Y, Inada Y, Nishikawa K. Role of angiotensin II in cerebrovascular and renal damage in deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1995; 13 : 113 –122.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Kim S, Ohta K, Hamaguchi A, Omura T, Yukimura T, Miura K, Inada Y, Wada T, Ishimura Y, Chatani F, Iwao H. Role of angiotensin II in renal injury of deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1994; 24 : 195 –204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Iwai N, Yamano Y, Chaki S, Konishi F, Bardhan S, Tibbetts C, Sasaki K, Hasegawa M, Matsuda Y, Inagami T. Rat angiotensin II receptor: cDNA sequence and regulation of the gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 177 : 299 –304.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Kambayashi Y, Bardhan S, Takahashi K, Tsuzuki S, Inui H, Hamakubo T, Inagami T. Molecular cloning of a novel angiotensin II receptor isoform involved in phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibition. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268 : 24543 –24546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Ann Biochem. 1987; 162 : 156 –159.

26. Wilson SK, Lynch DR, Snyder SH. Angiotensin-converting enzyme labeled with [3H]captopril: tissue localizations and changes in different models of hypertension in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1987; 80 : 841 –851.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Miyamori I, Matsubara T, Takeda Y, Koshida H, Soma R, Takeda R. Angiotensin II generation in mesenteric arteries in rats: effects of nephrectomy, deoxycorticosterone and dexamethasone. Endocrinol Jpn. 1990; 37 : 9 –17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Sessler FM, Kim SH, Malvin RL. Changes of renin isoelectric heterogeneity after acute and chronic stimulation of renin secretion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1986; 182 : 258 –262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Michel B, Grima M, Stephan D, Coquard C, Welsch C, Barthelmebs M, Imbs JL. Plasma renin activity and changes in tissue angiotensin converting enzyme. J Hypertens. 1994; 12 : 577 –584.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Samani NJ, Brammar WJ, Swales JD. Renal and extra-renal levels of renin mRNA in experimental hypertension. Clin Sci (Colch). 1991; 80 : 339 –344.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Kanagy NL, Fink GD. Losartan prevents salt-induced hypertension in reduced renal mass rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 265 : 1131 –1136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Wang DH, Yao A, Zhao H, DiPette DJ. Regulation of ANG II receptor in hypertension: role of ANG II. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271 (Heart Circ Physiol 40): H120 –H125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Ideishi M, Miura S, Sakai T, Maeda H, Kinoshita A, Sasaguri M, Jimi S, Arakawa K. Comparative effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin II antagonist in Dahl rats. Blood Press Suppl. 1994; 5 : 99 –104.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Guo DF, Uno S, Ishihata A, Nakamura N, Inagami T. Identification of a cis-acting glucocorticoid responsive element in the rat angiotensin II type 1A promoter. Circ Res. 1995; 77 : 249 –257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Douglas JG. Mechanism of adrenal angiotensin II receptor changes after nephrectomy in rats. J Clin Invest. 1981; 67 : 1171 –1176.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Lehoux JG, Bird IM, Rainey WE, Tremblay A, Ducharme L. Both low sodium and high potassium intake increase the level of adrenal angiotensin-II receptor type 1, but not that of adrenocorticotropin receptor. Endocrinology. 1994; 134 : 776 –782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Pernollet MG, Devynck MA, Matthews PG, Meyer P. Post-nephrectomy changes in adrenal angiotensin II receptors in the rat: influence of exogenous angiotensin and a competitive inhibitor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1977; 43 : 361 –372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Iwai N, Inagami T. Regulation of the expression of the rat angiotensin II receptor mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992; 182 : 1094 –1099.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Husain A, DeSilva P, Speth RC, Bumpus FM. Regulation of angiotensin II in rat adrenal gland. Circ Res. 1987; 60 : 640 –648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Llorens-Cortes C, Greenberg B, Huang H, Corvol P. Tissular expression and regulation of type 1 angiotensin II receptor subtypes by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis. Hypertension. 1994; 24 : 538 –548.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Wang DH, Du Y. Distinct mechanisms of upregulation of type 1A angiotensin II receptor gene expression in kidney and adrenal gland. Hypertension. 1995; 26 (pt 2): 1134 –1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Regitz-Zagrosek V, Auch-Schwelk W, Hess B, Klein U, Duske E, Steffen C, Hildebrandt AG, Fleck E. Tissue- and subtype-specific modulation of angiotensin II receptors by chronic treatment with cyclosporin A, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1 antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995; 26 : 66 –72.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Wakamiya R, Kohara K, Hiwada K. Gene expression of the type-1 angiotensin II receptor in rat adrenal gland. Blood Press Suppl. 1994; 5 : 109 –112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Moreau P, Drolet G, Yamaguchi N, de Champlain J. Alteration of prejunctional alpha 2-adrenergic autoinhibition in DOCA-salt hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1995; 8 : 287 –293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Wang DH, Du Y. {alpha}1-Adrenoreceptor blockade enhances low salt-induced upregulation of type I angiotensin II receptor in adrenal gland. Hypertension. 1996; 28 : 534 . Abstract.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
A. Hoeflich and M. Bielohuby
Mechanisms of adrenal gland growth: signal integration by extracellular signal regulated kinases1/2
J. Mol. Endocrinol., March 1, 2009; 42(3): 191 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F.-J. Lai, S.-J. Shin, Y.-J. Lee, S.-R. Lin, W.-Y. Jou, and J.-H. Tsai
Up-Regulation of Adrenal Cortical and Medullary Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and Gene Expression in Rats with Deoxycorticosterone Acetate-Salt Treatment
Endocrinology, January 1, 2000; 141(1): 325 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elijovich, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elijovich, F.
Right arrow Articles by Wang, D. H.