(Hypertension. 1997;29:471.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
State-of-the-Art-Lecture |
From the Clinica Medica (P.M., N.G.) and Farmacologia (M.V.V., M.P.D., V.A.), University of Sassari, Italy; National Institute of Biostructures and Biosystems (P.M.), Osilo, Italy; and Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (J.C.) and Anatomy and Cell Biology (J.A.S.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.
Correspondence to Paolo Madeddu, MD, Clinica Medica, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy. E-mail madeddu{at}mbox.vol.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: sodium kinins blood pressure
Abbreviations: BW = body weight HR = heart rate kat = katal MBP = mean blood pressure PBS = phosphate-buffered saline RUK = rat urinary kallikrein SBP = systolic blood pressure UCr = urinary creatinine UCrV = urinary creatinine excretion UKall = kallikrein activity in urine UKallV = urinary kallikrein excretion UNa = sodium concentration in urine UNaV = urinary sodium excretion UV = urinary volume
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, a strain was developed in our laboratory, by breeding rats from a Wistar stock according to urinary kallikrein phenotype, exclusively.4 This breeding approach represents an important difference compared with other experimental models of genetic hypertension in which urinary kallikrein excretion has been found to be decreased.57 Indeed, the low-kallikrein phenotype could be secondary to the increase in blood pressure in the latter strains. We found that application of dietary sodium loading induces a significant increase in the blood pressure of low-kallikrein rats compared with normal-kallikrein Wistar rats, an effect that was attributed to sodium retention.4 These results indicate an association between a genetically determined defect in urinary kallikrein excretion and blood pressure sensitivity to salt.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of rat glandular (or tissue) kallikrein administration on the exaggerated blood pressure response to salt in the low-kallikrein rats. In addition, since kidney weight was found to be reduced in this strain, we wished to determine the salient features of kidney histology.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rats were housed at a constant room temperature (24±1°C) and humidity (60±3%) with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. They had free access to rat chow (sodium, 0.12 mmol per gram; Mucedola) and tap water.
All procedures complied with the standards for the care and use of animals as stated in Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, National Academy of Science, Bethesda, Md).
Experiment 1: Effect of High Sodium Intake on SBP of Low-Kallikrein Rats
Rats had free access to rat chow (sodium, 0.12 mmol per gram chow) until the ninth week of age. At this stage, both controls and the low-kallikrein group (n=8 males each) were assigned to a high (0.84 mmol per gram chow) sodium diet for the following 20 days. SBP, HR, and BW were measured every 5 days. SBP and HR were measured by the tail-cuff plethysmography method (Recorder 8002, Ugo Basile, Biological Research Apparatus) in unanesthetized rats prewarmed for 10 minutes at 37°C in a thermostatically controlled heating cabinet. Each pressure value was obtained by averaging 8 to 10 individual readings.
Experiment 2: Effect of Chronic Intravenous Administration of Rat Glandular Kallikrein on the Blood Pressure Response to High Salt Intake in Low-Kallikrein Rats
RUK was purified from pooled urine according to the established method, and its purity was assessed with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.8
Low-kallikrein rats had free access to rat chow (sodium, 0.12 mmol per gram chow) until the 10th week of age. At this stage, they were randomly allocated to two groups (n=10 males each). Group 1 (controls) received an intravenous infusion of vehicle (normal saline, 60 µL/day) for 4 weeks, and group 2 received RUK (1.7 µg in 60 µL saline/d per 100 g BW). In preliminary experiments, this dose of RUK did not affect the SBP of lowkallikrein rats fed a normal sodium diet. Infusions were performed by the use of Alzet osmotic pumps (Alza Co) connected to polyethylene catheters (PE10, Clay Adams) whose free ends were inserted into the left femoral vein and advanced into the vena cava. The pumps were implanted into the abdominal cavity through a midline incision with rats under ether anesthesia. Four days later, both groups were assigned to a high (0.84 mmol per gram chow) sodium diet for the following 20 days. At the end of this period, rats returned to the initial diet (sodium, 0.12 mmol per g chow) for 4 additional days. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were obtained for the determination of sodium and creatinine concentration and kallikrein activity on two occasions in normal sodium conditions (before and after 4 days of intravenous infusion), over the first 5 days of the high-sodium diet, and at the end of sodium loading. During the collection periods, rats were maintained in individual metabolic cages, which allowed for a high degree of accuracy in the measurement of food and water intake by the inclusion of spill catches. Both urinary kallikrein and creatinine are stable under these experimental conditions. The chow was ground and blended before use. SBP, HR, and BW were measured every 5 days. At the end of the experiments, rats were anesthetized with ether. A polyethylene catheter (PE-50, Clay Adams) was inserted into the left carotid artery and advanced into the descending aorta. Then, it was tunneled under the skin and exteriorized at the back of the neck. On the morning of the following day, the MBP of unanesthetized rats was measured for 20 minutes by connecting the free end of the catheter to a Statham transducer (Gould). At the end of this period, blood (3 mL) was collected using syringes containing EDTA to measure immunoreactive kallikrein levels. Then, with rats under ether anesthesia, the heart and both kidneys were removed, cleaned, washed in saline, and weighed.
Experiment 3: Comparison of Histological Parameters of Kidney Sections From Normal (Controls) and Low-Kallikrein Rats in Normal Sodium Conditions
Control and low-kallikrein rats on normal sodium diet were killed with an excess of ether anesthesia. Both kidneys were removed, cleaned, washed in saline, blotted, and weighed. Sections of kidneys from each of three rats in both groups (normal and low-kallikrein) were fixed in buffered formaldehyde solution and paraffin embedded. They were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed microscopically and morphometrically to determine if any of the salient features of kidney morphology differed between groups. An optimally flat kidney section, cut longitudinally through both poles, having well-delineated cortex as well as outer and inner medulla, was analyzed from each animal. For linear measurements (diameters), an ocular micrometer was calibrated against a stage micrometer, and conversion factors were calculated for low (x4 objective) and medium (x10 objective) magnifications.
Cortical width (from capsule to arcuate arteries) was measured at low magnification along at least five (usually more) different perpendiculars to the cortex, going around the circumference of the cortex from pole to pole in each kidney section examined. These measurements were averaged for each sample, and the averages of the three samples in each group were then averaged for the group mean. The diameters of renal corpuscles and glomeruli were measured at medium magnification in a randomized way as follows: A cortical field was found randomly, and the ocular micrometer was set perpendicular to the cortical curvature. The two nearest renal corpuscles with either vascular or urinary poles were chosen and moved under the micrometer, and their maximum outer diameter (renal corpuscle) and width of vascular tuft (glomerulus) were measured. Then at least five subsequent fields were analyzed in a similar fashion. The measurements within each sample were averaged, and the mean of these averages formed a group mean.
For the glomerular counts, a square ocular grid, measuring 0.8 mm per side at medium magnification, was positioned over a cortical field so that a corner touched the capsule. Again, the fields were chosen randomly, at least six fields per kidney section. All glomeruli that were completely within the grid were counted, as well as those touching or intersecting the upper and left demarcation lines of the grid. Those touching or intersecting the right and bottom lines of the grid were not counted. The counts within each sample were averaged, and the mean of these sample averages was calculated as the group mean.
For immunohistochemistry studies, renal sections (5 µm) were cut and incubated overnight at 22°C with rabbit antiserum raised against purified RUK diluted in phosphate-buffered saline, according to the established method.9 This polyclonal antibody has been shown to be highly specific for kallikrein, but it also shows a low level (10%) cross-reactivity for esterase A, a related enzyme.8
Analytical Procedures
UV was determined gravimetrically. UNa was determined by flame photometry. UCr was measured by an automatic analyzer (Hitachi 704). UKall was determined by an amidolytic assay10 modified by addition of inhibitors of esterase A in the incubation buffer.4 It was expressed in katals (kat) per milliliter of urine, where 1 kat represents the enzyme activity able to cleave 1 mol substrate per second. To calculate urinary excretion, UNa, UCr, and UKall were multiplied by UV. Kallikrein levels in plasma were determined by a highly sensitive and specific radioimmunoassay for rat glandular kallikrein11 and expressed as nanograms per milliliter.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SEM. Multivariate repeated measures ANOVA was performed to test for interaction between time and grouping factor. Univariate ANOVA then was used to test for differences among groups and over time. Differences within or between groups were determined using paired or unpaired Students t test, respectively, with the Bonferroni multiple-comparison adjustment. A probability (P) less than .05 was used as the criterion of significance. Mathematical and statistical analyses were performed with a STATVIEW II package (Brain Power) on an Apple Macintosh IICX computer.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 2: Effect of Chronic Intravenous Administration of RUK on the Blood Pressure Response to High Salt Intake in Low-Kallikrein Rats
As indicated in Fig 1, no group difference was detected regarding SBP, HR, and BW under basal conditions (day -4) as well as 4 days after the beginning of RUK or vehicle infusions. Application of sodium loading increased the SBP of the vehicle-treated rats, while it did not alter that of RUK-treated rats. Indeed, a modest increase was observed only at day 5 in the latter group, but this change did not reach statistical significance (P=.08, NS). A group difference in SBP levels was detected 10 days after the start of sodium loading, and it was maintained after the rats had returned to a normal sodium diet. Though the SBP of RUK-treated rats was brought below basal levels at days 20 and 25, these differences did not reach statistical significance (P=.08, NS). In vehicle-treated rats, SBP returned to basal levels after 20 days on the high-sodium diet, and it changed no further when the diet was returned to normal. At this stage, the MBP levels of RUK-treated rats were lower than those of controls (105±2 versus 120±2 mm Hg, respectively; P<.05). No between-group difference was detected over all the durations of the study as far as HR and BW values were concerned.
|
As shown in Table 1, high sodium intake increased UV and UNaV in both groups, while UCrV was reduced. These changes were similar between groups. No group difference was detected regarding the cumulative intake of food and water as well as the cumulative UV and UNaV during the first 5 days of the high-sodium diet (data not shown).
|
UKallV was increased after 4 days of RUK infusion (from 13.6±1.4 to 17.8±2.1 nkat/24 hours; P<.01). No further change was observed after 20 days of sodium loading in this group (17.5±2.3 nkat/24 hours). UKallV remained unchanged in vehicle-treated rats (from 13.2±0.9 to 14.3±1.1 and 14.8±1.7 nkat/24 hours; P=NS).
At the end of the experiments, plasma immunoreactive kallikrein levels were higher in low-kallikrein rats given RUK (66.4±4.4 versus 57.7±2.4 ng/mL in controls; P<.05).
The ratio of heart weight to BW was significantly lower in low-kallikrein rats given RUK infusion (300±8 versus 321±4 mg/100 g BW in controls; P<.01), whereas the ratio of kidney weight to BW was similar (335±47 versus 333±7 mg/100 BW in controls; P=NS).
Experiment 3: Comparison of Histological Parameters of Kidney Sections From Normal (Controls) and Low-Kallikrein Rats on Normal Sodium Diet
The ratio of kidney weight to BW was lower in lowkallikrein rats than in controls (329±47 and 370±7 mg/100 g BW, respectively; P<.01). Initial observations of stained histological sections of the kidneys from the two groups of animals suggested that the renal corpuscles in the low-kallikrein group may have been more "swollen" than those in the control group (Fig 2A and 2B, left panels). This was verified by performing morphometric analyses. As shown in Table 2, the difference between the groups was largely in the width of Bowmans space (urinary space) enclosed by the parietal and visceral layers of Bowmans capsule. The width of the urinary space in low-kallikrein rats was about double that of the normal group. The method of acquisition of the data precludes this difference resulting from tissue processing, sectioning, or orientation artifact. The data obtained also indicate that although the cortical widths of kidneys from both groups are similar, the number of renal corpuscles (and glomeruli) per unit square area is significantly lower in the low-kallikrein group (Fig 2A and 2B, right panels). Other differences (not analyzed morphometrically) were observed in portions of the distal tubule: (1) the nuclei in the macula densa of the low-kallikrein group appeared not to be as closely packed as those of controls (compare Fig 2A and 2B, right panels), and (2) the late distal tubule (connecting tubule/cortical collecting duct), which is the site of most of the true kidney kallikrein, appeared to be longer and more distended in the control group than in the low-kallikrein group (see Fig 3A and 3B).
|
|
|
Fig 3 shows the results of immunohistochemistry studies. A greater intensity of staining was detected in the late distal tubule (arrows) in sections obtained from normalkallikrein rats. Lighter staining in proximal tubules probably indicates the presence of another member of the kallikrein gene family that cross-reacts with the polyclonal antiserum.9,12 In the sections obtained from low-kallikrein rats, the staining appeared to be greater in the proximal tubules, while the late distal tubules exhibited little or no staining.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preliminary studies suggest that kallikrein administration reduces blood pressure in salt-sensitive but not in salt-resistant hypertensives.3 In addition, long-term infusion of RUK, at a dose that does not affect systemic blood pressure, reduces renal injury in hypertensive salt-sensitive Dahl rats, as reflected by attenuation of glomerulosclerotic lesions and tubular damage and by a reduction in proteinuria.15
In our study, infusion of RUK prevented the increase in SBP induced by a high-salt diet in low-kallikrein rats. Immunoreactive tissue kallikrein levels in plasma were increased by 14% in RUK-treated low-kallikrein rats. Since circulating levels were not measured in normalkallikrein rats, we cannot say if circulating immunoreactive kallikrein differs between strains and if RUK infusion normalized the plasma levels of low-kallikrein rats. Thus, it is not possible to conclude that the blood pressure response to RUK is related to its effect on plasma kallikrein.
We found that RUK infusion normalized the elevated ratio of heart weight to BW found in this strain. Uehara et al15 found that infusion of RUK alone was ineffective in lowering blood pressure and in preventing the increase in heart weight in salt-sensitive hypertensive Dahl rats. However, RUK infusion potentiated the antihypertensive and antihypertrophic effects of cilazapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.15 Since the dose of RUK used in the present study was
4x higher than that used by Uehara et al (1.7 and 0.4 µg/d, respectively), the antihypertrophic effect of RUK may be dose related and dependent on the concomitant reduction in the hemodynamic load to the heart. Another important difference is that in the study by Uehara et al,15 treatment with RUK was performed in rats whose SBP and heart weight values (190 mm Hg and 390 mg/100 g BW, respectively) indicate more severe hypertension and greater heart hypertrophy than in our salt-loaded low-kallikrein rats (158 mm Hg and 321 mg/100 g BW, respectively). Therefore, diversity in the severity and duration of hypertension could affect the protection exerted by RUK. Recent studies have suggested that modulation of the endogenous kallikrein-kinin system is instrumental for cardiovascular protective mechanisms,16,17 namely by interfering with myocardial and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Thus, regression of myocardial hypertrophy following RUK infusion could be attributable not only to the reduced hemodynamic load but also to a direct effect of RUK and its enzymatic products on the heart.
In association with an enhanced blood pressure sensitivity to salt, the low-kallikrein rats showed a decreased urinary excretion of sodium during salt loading.4 Similar results were reported in kininogen-deficient Brown Norway Katholiek rats, which genetically lack the ability to generate kinins.18 Thus, we hypothesized that the enhanced blood pressure sensitivity to salt in low-kallikrein rats (whose alteration is limited to kidney)4 is due to sodium retention and total fluid volume expansion. The possibility that alterations in renal filtration and/or tubular handling of sodium are present in this strain is supported by previous findings showing that salt loading causes positive sodium balance, a reduced ratio of UNa V to UKallV, decreased excretion of creatinine, and increased BW.4 Hence, correction of the exaggerated blood pressure response to sodium loading by RUK might be attributed to the effects of kinins on renal filtration and/or tubular sodium handling. We did not measure plasma or urinary kinins in low-kallikrein rats under basal conditions or during RUK infusion; however, Uehara et al15 showed that urinary excretion of bradykinin is increased twofold by RUK at a dose lower than that used by us. Our results indicate that renal function was not affected by RUK infusion during the first 5 days of high sodium intake. This does not exclude a diuretic and natriuretic effect of RUK during the following days of sodium loading, since UV and UNaV were not measured thereafter. Another possibility is that the blood pressure effect of RUK in salt-loaded rats is due to a direct effect of kinins on vascular tone. To define the role of bradykinin in the action of RUK, it would be necessary to evaluate whether its antihypertensive effect in salt-loaded rats is abolished with the bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist Icatibant. In preliminary experiments, we found that the acute intravenous injection of 50 nmol Icatibant does not alter the MBP of RUK-treated low-kallikrein rats (P.M., unpublished observations, 1996). However, chronic blockade of the B2-receptor appears to be a more appropriate approach to elucidate this issue.
A trophic role of the kallikrein-kinin system in postnatal renal development is suggested by the observation that early, lifelong blockade of bradykinin receptors suppresses renal growth and reduces UCr excretion.13 Consistent with this possibility is our observation that the functional alterations reported above in the low-klikrein rats were associated with a lower ratio of kidney weight to BW and reduction of the number of glomeruli per unit of area. On other hand, the low-kallikrein strain might be particularly susceptible to develop renal damage as a consequence of modest elevations in blood pressure levels. The increase in the width of Bowmans space (urinary space) could be attributable to greater filtration pressure in this strain.
A general consensus exists regarding localization of kallikrein in the connecting tubule segment of the distal tubule.9,12,1921 Serious problems with localizing kallikrein-like enzymes relate to the antigenic similarity of the members of the kallikrein gene family of serine proteinases.8,9,12 Hence, polyclonal antibodies to a member of the kallikrein gene family may also bind to related antigens if they are present. For instance, staining of polyclonal antibodies against RUK at the level of the proximal tubule has been demonstrated to be due to another kallikrein gene family member such as esterase A.9,12 Therefore, the light staining detected in proximal tubules of normal rats using polyclonal antibodies may be attributable to the latter enzyme. In the sections obtained from low-kallikrein rats, the late distal tubules exhibit little or no staining, thus suggesting reduced production of the enzyme at the level where true kallikrein is synthesized. The other finding, that proximal tubule staining appeared to be greater, might be explained by enhanced production of a tissue kallikrein-related enzyme in the low-kallikrein strain. Though it is not clear how this enzyme functions in kidney physiology, esterase A shares substrate specificity with kallikrein and generates kinins from kininogen.9 Therefore, one might speculate that an increase in esterase A could compensate at least in part for the deficient production of true kallikrein.
Another possible explanation of our immunohistochemical results may be that staining in the proximal tubule of low-kallikrein rats is related to glomerular filtration of circulating tissue kallikrein and consequent reabsorption by epithelial cells. On the basis of its molecular weight and isoelectric point and on the results of clearance studies using radiolabeled kallikrein in the rat, it is unlikely that circulating kallikrein is normally filtered at the glomerulus.22 However, it could cross the glomerular membrane in chronic renal failure models, as suggested by the observation of reabsorption droplets in the proximal tubule, a site of the nephron where true tissue kallikrein is not detected in either human or rat normal kidneys.21 Should the latter hypothesis be confirmed, urinary kallikrein levels could overestimate the real amount of enzyme synthesized within the kidney of low-kallikrein rats. Studies using two different monoclonal antibodies, each specific for kallikrein and esterase A, are necessary to elucidate this issue.
The major conclusions that can be drawn from our results are that an inherited low urinary kallikrein phenotype does result in an increased blood pressure sensitivity to salt that can be corrected by chronic replacement with rat tissue kallikrein. In addition, histological abnormalities have been detected at different levels in the nephron that may be functionally related to the altered cardiovascular and renal phenotype.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bonner G, Thieven B, Rutten H, Chrosch R, Krone W. Renal kallikrein is a determinant of salt sensitivity. J Hypertens. 1993; 11 (suppl 5): S210 S211.
3. Ferri C, Bellini C, Carlomagno A, Perrone A, Santucci A. Urinary kallikrein and salt sensitivity in essential hypertensive males. Kidney Int. 1994; 46 : 780 788.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Madeddu P, Varoni MV, Demontis MP, Pinna-Parpaglia P, Glorioso N, Anania V. Urinary kallikrein: a marker of blood pressure sensitivity to salt. Kidney Int. 1996; 49 : 1422 1427.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Carretero OA, Amin VM, Ocholik T, Scicli AG, Koch J. Urinary kallikrein in rats bred for their susceptibility and resistance to the hypertensive effect of salt: a new radioimmunoassay for its direct determination.
Circ Res. 1978;
42
: 727
731.
6. Keiser HR, Geller RG, Margolius HS, Pisano JJ. Urinary kallikrein in hypertensive animal models. Fed Proc. 1976; 35 : 199 202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bianchi G, Barber BR, Torielli L, Ferrari P. The Milan Hypertensive strain. In: Swales JD, ed. Textbook of Hypertension. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994: 457 461.
8. Chen YP, Chao J, Chao L. Molecular cloning and characterization of two rat renal kallikrein genes. Biochemistry. 1988; 27 : 7189 7196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Simson JAV, Rowell C, Barrett JM, King J, Chao J. Rat urinary kallikrein localization in kidney; effects of fixation. Histochem J. 1987; 19 : 633 642.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Amundsen E, Putter J, Friberger P, Knos M, Larsbroten M, Claeson G. Methods for the determination of glandular kallikrein by means of a chromogenic tripeptide substrate. Adv Exp Med. 1979; 102A : 83 95.
11. Shimamoto K, Margolius HS, Chao J, Crosswell AR. A direct radioimmunoassay of rat urinary kallikrein and comparison with other measures of urinary kallikrein activity. J Lab Clin Med. 1979; 94 : 172 179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Simson JO, Condon JL, Chao L, Chao J. Comparison of the distribution of tissue kallikrein and esterase A, a kallikrein-like enzyme, in rat kidney using specific monoclonal antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem. 1988; 36 : 1251 1254.[Abstract]
13. Madeddu P, Pinna Parpaglia P, Demontis MP, Varoni MV, Fattaccio MC, Anania V, Glorioso N. Early blockade of bradykinin B2-receptors alters the adult cardiovascular phenotype in rats.
Hypertension. 1995;
25
: 453
459.
14. Hunt SC, Wu LL, Slattery ML, Meilke AW, Williams RR. Environmental determinants of urinary kallikrein excretion. Am J Hypertens. 1993; 6 : 226 233.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Uehara Y, Hirawa N, Kawabata Y, Suzuki T, Ohshima N, Oka K, Ikeda T, Goto A, Toyo-oka T, Kizuki K, Omata M. Long-term infusion of kallikrein attenuates renal injury in Dahl salt-sensitive rats.
Hypertension. 1994;
24
: 770
778.
16. Parratt JR. Protection of the heart by ischemic preconditioning: mechanisms and possibilities for pharmacological exploitation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1994; 15 : 19 25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Linz W, Wiemer G, Gohlke P, Unger T, Scholkens BA. Contribution of kinins to the cardiovascular actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 1995; 47 : 25 49.[Abstract]
18. Majima M, Yoshida O, Mihara H, Muto T, Mizogami S, Kuribayashi Y, Katori M, Oh-ishi S. High sensitivity to salt in kininogen-deficient Brown Norway Katholiek rats.
Hypertension. 1993;
22
: 705
714.
19. Barajas L, Powers K, Carretero O, Scicli AG, Inagami T. Immunocytochemical localization of renin and kallikrein in the rat renal cortex. Kidney Int. 1986; 29 : 965 970.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Proud D, Knepper MA, Pisano JJ. Distribution of immunoreactive kallikrein along the rat nephron. Am J Physiol. 1982; 244 : F510 F515.
21. Vio CP, Loyola S, Velarde V. Localization of components of the kallikrein-kinin system in the kidney: relation to renal function. Hypertension. 1992; 19 (suppl I): 10 16.
22. Rabito SF, Seto M, Maitra SR, Carretero OA. Clearance and metabolism of glandular kallikrein in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1985; 10 : 250 256.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Chao and L. Chao Kallikrein-kinin in stroke, cardiovascular and renal disease Exp Physiol, May 1, 2005; 90(3): 291 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Iwai, N. Yasui, H. Naraba, N. Tago, H. Yamawaki, and H. Sumiya Klk1 as One of the Genes Contributing to Hypertension in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rat Hypertension, May 1, 2005; 45(5): 947 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith Endogenous angiotensin modulates PGE2-mediated release of substance P from renal mechanosensory nerve fibers Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2002; 282(1): R19 - R30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-I. Suga, M. I. Phillips, P. E. Ray, J. A. Raleigh, C. P. Vio, Y.-G. Kim, M. Mazzali, K. L. Gordon, J. Hughes, and R. J. Johnson Hypokalemia induces renal injury and alterations in vasoactive mediators that favor salt sensitivity Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F620 - F629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Duka, E. Kintsurashvili, I. Gavras, C. Johns, M. Bresnahan, and H. Gavras Vasoactive Potential of the B1 Bradykinin Receptor in Normotension and Hypertension Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88(3): 275 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zicha and J. Kunes Ontogenetic Aspects of Hypertension Development: Analysis in the Rat Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1227 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |