Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1997;29:1051-1057

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majid, D. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Navar, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majid, D. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Navar, L. G.

(Hypertension. 1997;29:1051-1057.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Pressure Natriuresis and Renal Medullary Blood Flow in Dogs

Dewan S. A. Majid; Murrell Godfrey; ; L. Gabriel Navar

From the Department of Physiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La.

Correspondence to Dewan S.A. Majid, PhD, Department of Physiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave, New Orleans, LA 70112.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract In the present study, we evaluated the effects of changes in arterial pressure on regional renal blood flows and sodium excretion in anesthetized dogs during control conditions and after 5% volume expansion with isotonic saline. Medullary and cortical blood flow responses were determined with laser-Doppler needle flow probes inserted into the midmedullary and midcortical regions, and whole-kidney blood flow was assessed with an electromagnetic flow probe. Volume expansion in six dogs caused marked increases in urine flow (20.2±5.5 to 82.5±22.7 µL·min-1·g-1) and sodium excretion (3.2±0.5 to 11.1±2.7 µmol·min-1·g-1), with slight increases in glomerular filtration rate (0.92±0.03 to 1.01±0.02 mL·min-1·g-1) but no significant changes in total renal blood flow (4.7±0.3 to 5.2±0.6 mL·min-1·g-1), medullary blood flow (+6±9%), or cortical blood flow (+12±10%). During stepwise reductions in renal arterial pressure (150 to 75 mm Hg) elicited with a renal arterial occluder, both before and after volume expansion, medullary, cortical, and total renal blood flows as well as glomerular filtration rate exhibited efficient autoregulation, with slopes not significantly different from zero over this range of arterial pressure. There were marked increases in the slopes of the relationships between arterial pressure and urine flow (0.18±0.05 to 0.78±0.27 µL·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1) as well as sodium excretion (0.03±0.004 to 0.10±0.03 µmol·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1) during volume expansion. These data demonstrate that medullary blood flow is efficiently autoregulated in dogs during control and volume-expanded states and indicate that the mechanism responsible for the arterial pressure–induced changes in sodium excretion does not depend on coincident alterations in medullary blood flow.


Key Words: blood flow, renal • laser-Doppler flowmetry • calcium channel blockers • natriuresis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
It is well known that the kidney has the ability to alter its UNaV in response to acute changes in RAP over a range in which filtered load and total RBF do not change.1 2 3 4 Such a relationship between RAP and UNaV has remained a critical aspect of many concepts concerning the long-term regulation of blood pressure.5 However, the precise intrarenal mechanism responsible for arterial pressure–induced natriuretic responses has not yet been clearly defined.1 2 3 4 Because this phenomenon of pressure natriuresis is observed in the absence of changes in filtered load and within the autoregulatory range for RBF and GFR, it is clear that changes in tubular sodium reabsorption are primarily responsible for the changes in UNaV. Changes in intrarenal hemodynamics2 6 7 8 and/or paracrine factors3 9 10 11 12 have been suggested to serve as the possible links between arterial pressure and the changes in tubular reabsorption. Although there is clear agreement that blood flow to the renal cortex exhibits efficient autoregulation similar to that of total RBF, the autoregulatory behavior of MBF has remained controversial.6 7 8 13 14

Recent advances in LDF with single-fiber probes have provided an opportunity for the study of dynamic microvascular blood flow variations in discrete regions of the kidney.6 13 14 15 Recent studies using this approach have reported that autoregulatory efficiency of blood flow in the renal medulla is similar to that in the whole kidney in anesthetized dogs.13 14 In contrast, studies in rats6 7 have indicated that under volume-expanded conditions, MBF autoregulatory efficiency in response to changes in arterial pressure is significantly impaired compared with CBF.

Although it has been suggested that arterial pressure–induced changes in UNaV are associated with coincident changes in MBF,6 7 8 no systematic study has been conducted to evaluate the direct correlation between changes in MBF and UNaV during alterations in arterial pressure. We designed the present study to examine simultaneously the MBF and UNaV responses to changes in RAP in anesthetized dogs using LDF needle probes and obtain a better understanding of the role of MBF in mediating the arterial pressure–induced changes in UNaV. Accordingly, we evaluated renal responses to changes in RAP during control conditions and after a 5% volume expansion with an infusion of isotonic saline.16 17 18


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experiments were conducted in 17 mongrel dogs (body weight, 20.6±0.9 kg). Eight of these dogs were used for studies validating the responsiveness of the LDF needle probes to various interventions. Pressure-natriuresis experiments were conducted in 6 dogs. An additional 3 dogs were used for examination of the autoregulatory behavior of regional RBF after calcium channel blockade. All dogs were given supplemental amounts of sodium chloride (1.5 g/kg body wt per day for 3 days) added to the normal laboratory diet so that they achieved a sodium-replete state. Dogs were anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg/kg body wt IV) and artificially ventilated. Body temperature was maintained within the normal range (99° to 101°F) with an electric heating pad. Systemic arterial pressure was measured from a catheter placed in the abdominal aorta inserted via the right femoral artery. The catheter was connected to a pressure transducer, and mean systemic arterial pressure was recorded on a polygraph (model 7D, Grass Instruments). The left femoral artery was cannulated for collection of blood samples. The femoral and jugular veins were cannulated for administration of saline, inulin solution, and additional doses of pentobarbital sodium as necessary.

The left kidney was exposed through a flank incision and the renal artery isolated from surrounding tissue. Renal denervation was performed by cutting all the visible nerves projecting to the kidney from the aorticoadrenal ganglion. RBF was measured with an electromagnetic flow probe placed on the renal artery near its origin from the aorta and connected to a square-wave flowmeter (Carolina Medical Electronics). An adjustable plastic clamp was placed on the renal artery distal to the electromagnetic flow probe to allow acute reductions in RAP. A curved 23-gauge needle cannula was inserted into the renal artery distal to the plastic clamp and was connected to a pressure transducer for measurement of RAP. Another catheter was also connected to this needle cannula for continuous infusion of heparinized saline or drug solutions at a rate of 0.4 mL/min. Urine was collected from a catheter placed in the ureter.

Two needle probes connected to a dual-channel LDF (Periflux 4001, Perimed) were used for measurement of relative blood flows in the cortical and medullary regions of the kidney.6 13 14 15 These probes were inserted to approximately 5 and 15 mm in depth inside the kidney mass so the tips were positioned in the midcortical and midmedullary regions, respectively.13 15 As previously noted, insertion of the thin probes (500 µm diameter) did not cause any perceptible damage to the kidney.6 13 14 15 The positions of the tips of the needle probes were confirmed at the end of each experiment by dissecting the kidney and viewing the needle tract and regions surrounding the fiber tip. These flow probes were calibrated with a standard calibration device using a motility standard that is a colloidal suspension of latex particles (10 µm microspheres). Brownian motion of the latex particles provides the standard value of 250 perfusion units. One perfusion unit is an arbitrary value equal to an analog output of 10 mV. To avoid respiratory movement artifacts in the laser-Doppler signal, we kept the kidney in a fixed position by placing it on a plastic holder similar to that used for micropuncture experiments. Basal RBF was not reduced after the kidney was immobilized. The output signals from the LDF were recorded on a Grass polygraph. Although the changes in absolute voltage signals (ie, perfusion unit values) were continuously monitored on the digital screen of the flowmeter, the data are reported as a percentage of the basal levels at spontaneous pressures. However, it was always noted that the absolute outputs from the cortical probes were substantially greater (approximately three times) than the output from the medullary probe. An example of this difference in signal is shown in Fig 1Down. In 17 dogs, the absolute values of control CBF averaged 364±22 perfusion units, whereas MBF was 118±10 perfusion units, reflecting the predictable differences in CBF and MBF.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Example of the difference in LDF needle probe signal output from cortical and medullary regions of the kidney. At the start of the experiment, when both probes were introduced to similar depth (5 mm) into the cortical tissue, absolute signals were similar (301 vs 305 perfusion units [PU]).When one probe was advanced farther to 15 mm in depth for medullary recordings, absolute signals decreased to around 78 from 305 perfusion units, indicating a predictable difference in blood flow between the cortex and medulla. EMF indicates electromagnetic flow probe, recording total RBF; SAP, systemic arterial pressure.

After completion of surgery, a 2.5% solution of inulin in normal saline was administered into the jugular vein at least 45 minutes before the onset of the experimental protocol. An initial dose of 1.6 mL/kg body wt was followed by a continuous infusion of 0.3 mL·kg-1·min-1. At least 45 minutes before the start of the experimental protocol, the right common carotid artery was occluded and the left common carotid artery was partially constricted to elevate the basal level of mean arterial pressure to around 150 mm Hg.

For examination of the relationship between blood flows in the kidney and pressure natriuresis in six dogs, the experimental protocol was started with urine collections for two consecutive 10-minute periods at spontaneous RAP. At the midpoint of each collection period, an arterial blood sample (2 mL) was taken for measurement of plasma inulin, sodium, potassium, and osmolar concentrations. RAP was then reduced in steps (125, 100, and 75 mm Hg) by adjusting the clamp on the renal artery. Five minutes was allowed for stabilization at each RAP level before a 10-minute urine sample was collected. After the last reduction in RAP, the clamp was released completely to reestablish control RAP and RBF. Then the dogs were subjected to extracellular volume expansion with infusion of isotonic saline (bolus dose of 200 mL and continuous infusion of 1 mL·kg-1·min-1); the infusion was continued for the duration of the experiment. Forty minutes after the initiation of the saline infusion, the protocol was repeated for examination of the renal responses to reductions in RAP during volume expansion.

For examination of the sensitivity of the LDF needle probes to detect changes in MBF, bolus doses of acetylcholine (1 ng to 1 µg) and Ang II (0.05 to 5 ng) were administered intrarenally in eight dogs. It was observed that the changes in MBF recorded with the LDF needle probe in response to administration of these vasoactive agents were directly correlated with the changes in total RBF recorded with an electromagnetic flow probe. Fig 2Down compares the responses from LDF needle probes with those obtained from the electromagnetic flow probe. There was a close association between the changes in MBF and changes in total RBF in response to different doses of acetylcholine (Fig 2ADown; r=.89, P<.001) and Ang II (Fig 2BDown; r=.75, P<.001). Similar sensitivity of LDF probes in detecting MBF responses to various vasoactive agents in rats has been reported by Mattson et al.6 Consistent with the reported observations in dogs,19 it is noted that Ang II causes greater decreases in MBF than total RBF (Fig 2BDown). In response to Ang II doses, the percent changes in MBF were significantly greater (P<.05) than the changes in total RBF (Fig 2BDown), whereas MBF and RBF responses during bolus doses of acetylcholine did not differ significantly (Fig 2ADown).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Comparison of responsiveness of LDF needle probe measuring MBF and electromagnetic flow probe (EMF) measuring total RBF in response to intrarenal administration of different doses of acetylcholine (Ach, 1 ng to 1 µg) (A) and Ang II (0.05 to 5 ng) (B).

Further validation studies were performed for examination of the MBF responses during calcium channel blockade, which has been shown to cause impairment of autoregulatory efficiency in total RBF.20 Felodopine (Astra Pharmaceuticals) was administered intrarenally (1 µg·kg-1·min-1) in three dogs. The effects of changes in RAP on total RBF, CBF, and MBF were examined before and 10 minutes after the initiation of felodopine infusion. After control measurements at spontaneous arterial pressures, RAP was reduced in steps of 10 to 20 mm Hg for 1 to 2 minutes in each step with the adjustable clamp.13 After the last reduction in RAP, the clamp was released to reestablish spontaneous RAP.

At the end of each experiment, the electromagnetic flow probe was calibrated in situ by collection of timed blood samples into the graduated cylinder at different flow rates from a catheter placed in the renal artery. The kidney was then removed, stripped of all surrounding tissue, blotted dry, and weighed so that the calculated parameters could be expressed per gram of kidney weight. The localization of the fiber probes was confirmed after the kidneys were removed by direct observation of the position of the tips.

Flame photometry (Instrumentation Laboratories) was used for measurement of sodium and potassium concentrations in plasma and urine. Inulin concentrations in plasma and urine samples were determined by the anthrone colorimetric technique (Gilford Instruments). Plasma and urinary osmolality were determined by vapor pressure osmometry (Wescor Inc). Urinary concentration of nitrate/nitrite (NO3-/NO2-) was measured with the Greiss reaction technique after enzymatic reductions of nitrate to nitrite in the samples.9 NO3-/NO2- is the metabolic end product of NO, and changes in the urinary excretion rate of NO3-/NO2- are considered to reflect changes in the production of endogenous NO, although there is a basal excretion rate dependent on dietary nitrate intake.

Values are reported as mean±SE. Statistical comparisons of differences in the responses were made by Student's paired t test. Differences in the mean values were deemed significant at a value of P<=.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Renal Excretory and Regional Blood Flow Responses to Changes in RAP Before Volume Expansion
Control RAP was raised from 124±3.3 to 147±1.7 mm Hg by bilateral partial carotid constriction. Hematocrit during control conditions before volume expansion averaged 0.47±0.01. Plasma protein levels and colloid osmotic pressure were 5.2±0.2 g/100 mL and 16.8±0.8 mm Hg, respectively. During the control period, RBF and GFR were 4.7±0.3 and 0.92±0.03 mL·min-1·g-1, respectively. Urine flow, UNaV, FENa, potassium excretion, and urinary excretion of NO3-/NO2- during the control periods were 20.2±5.5 µL {bullet}min-1·g-1, 3.2±0.5 µmol·min-1·g-1, 2.4±0.3%, 0.86±0.12 µmol·min-1·g-1, and 1.4±0.1 nmol {bullet} min-1·g-1, respectively. Urine osmolality and osmolar excretion during the control period were 669±135 mOsm·L-1 and 10.5±1.5 µOsm·min-1·g-1, respectively. As previously shown,9 10 11 13 RBF and GFR demonstrated efficient autoregulatory behavior in response to reductions in RAP down to 75 mm Hg (Fig 3Down). Both MBF and CBF maintained autoregulatory efficiency similar to that of total RBF (Figs 3Down and 4Down). The slopes of the relationships between RAP and RBF (0.002±0.002 mL·min-1·g-1), MBF (-0.18±0.16 %·mm Hg-1), CBF (-0.01±0.07 %·mm Hg-1), and GFR (-0.001±0.001 mL·min-1·g-1) were not significantly different from zero. As shown in Figs 5Down and 6Down, urine flow, UNaV, FENa, and the urinary excretion rate of NO3-/NO2- decreased in response to decreases in RAP. The slopes of the relationships between RAP and urine flow (0.18±0.05 µL·min-1·g-1), urinary excretion rate of NO3-/NO2- (0.01±0.002 nmol·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1), UNaV (0.03±0.004 µmol · min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1), and FENa (0.023±0.003% · mm Hg-1) were statistically significant. These responses in renal excretory function were similar to those previously observed in our laboratory.9 10 11



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Total RBF (A) and GFR (B) responses to changes in RAP (n=6).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. MBF (A) and CBF (B) responses to changes in RAP (n=6).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Urine flow (V) (A) and urinary excretion rate of nitrate/nitrite (UNO3/NO2.V) (B) responses to changes in RAP (n=6).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. UNaV (A) and FENa (B) responses to changes in RAP (n=6).

Renal Excretory and Regional Blood Flow Responses to Changes in RAP After Volume Expansion
After volume expansion with an intravenous infusion of isotonic saline (5% of body weight) for 45 minutes, RAP did not change significantly (142±5.8 mm Hg) from control periods. Average hematocrit was significantly decreased to 0.40±0.02 (P<.05). There were also decreases in plasma protein levels (4.4±0.3 g/100 mL, P<.001) and colloid osmotic pressure (13.3±0.7 mm Hg, P<.001) after acute saline loading. The slight increases in RBF (5.2±0.6 mL·min-1·g-1), MBF (+6±9%), and CBF (+12±10%) were not statistically significant, whereas GFR increased slightly (1.01±0.02 mL ·min-1·g-1, P<.05). In contrast, there were marked increases in urine flow (82.5±22.7 µL·min-1·g-1, P<.05), UNaV (11.1±2.7 µmol·min-1·g-1, P<.05), and FENa (7.9±2.0%, P<.05) during volume expansion. The urinary excretion rates of NO3-/NO2- (1.93±0.35 nmol·min-1·g-1, P<.05) and potassium (1.30± 0.20 µmol·min-1·g-1, P<.05) also increased slightly. There were significant decreases in urine osmolality (467±98 mOsm·L-1, P<.05) and increases in osmolar excretion rate (26.0±6.8 µOsm·min-1·g-1, P<.05).

During reductions in RAP down to 75 mm Hg after volume expansion, the autoregulatory efficiency of RBF and GFR remained intact (Fig 3Up), and the slopes of the relationships between RAP and RBF (-0.002±0.002 mL·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1) as well as between RAP and GFR (-0.0007±0.0003 mL·min-1·g-1· mm Hg-1) were not significantly different from zero nor from the values obtained before volume expansion. Similar autoregulatory efficiency was observed in MBF and CBF during changes in RAP (Fig 4Up), without any significant change in the slopes of the relationships between RAP and MBF (-0.04±0.07 %·mm Hg-1) and CBF (-0.14±0.06 %·mm Hg-1) from zero or the control period. However, the volume expansion elicited marked increases in the slopes of the relationships between RAP and urine flow (0.78±0.27 µL ·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1), UNaV (0.10±0.03 µmol · min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1), and FENa (0.06±0.02 % ·mm Hg-1) (Figs 5Up and 6Up). The slope of RAP versus urinary excretion of NO3-/NO2- increased slightly (0.014±0.003 nmol·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1), but this was not statistically significant (Fig 5Up).

Effects of Calcium Channel Blockade on Renal Autoregulation
Infusion of felodopine (1 µg·kg-1·min-1) in three dogs resulted in a decrease in arterial pressure from 142±3.3 to 125±2.9 mm Hg and increases in total RBF from 4.7±0.5 to 5.8±0.3 mL·min-1·g-1 (P<.01). There were also increases in CBF (23±4%, P<.01) and MBF (43±10%, P<.05). As reported previously,20 autoregulatory efficiency of total RBF after calcium channel blockade by felodopine was impaired (Fig 7Down). The slope of the pressure-flow relationship within the autoregulatory range of RAP (140 to 70 mm Hg) was significantly altered (-0.0025±0.0008 to 0.023±0.007 mL ·min-1·g-1·mm Hg-1) during felodopine infusion. Similar impairment of autoregulatory efficiency was also observed in CBF and MBF (Fig 7Down). During the control period, the slopes of RAP versus MBF as well as RAP versus CBF within the autoregulatory range were not significantly different from zero. However, during felodopine infusion, these slopes were significantly altered (0.61±0.08 and 0.60±0.12 %·mm Hg-1, respectively) from the control period.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Responses to changes in RAP on total RBF (A), MBF (B), and CBF (C) during calcium channel blockade by intrarenal administration of felodopine (1 µg·kg-1·min-1, n=3). Mean curves for RBF, CBF, and MBF autoregulation were generated by extrapolating blood flow values at different RAP levels (at 20–mm Hg intervals ranging from 10 mm Hg to highest spontaneous pressure) from each individual curve obtained in each dog. RBF was recorded by electromagnetic flow probe; CBF and MBF, by LDF.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the present study, arterial pressure–induced changes in urine flow and UNaV were observed under conditions of highly efficient autoregulation of blood flow to the renal cortex and medulla, measured simultaneously with LDF needle probes. The changes in UNaV observed in the present study were similar to those reported previously by our laboratory.9 10 11 The MBF responses are consistent with recent studies that used LDF optical fiber probes.13 14 In further experiments, we also demonstrated that the autoregulatory efficiency of MBF could be altered (Fig 7Up) when whole-kidney blood flow autoregulation was impaired by calcium channel blockade in dogs.20 Thus, this technique is able to detect changes in MBF in response to changes in arterial pressure when they occur. Although another recent study in anesthetized dogs8 indicated that MBF was not autoregulated with high efficiency, it should be considered that MBF measurements in that study were made with a multifiber LDF probe placed on the surface of the medulla exposed after excision of renal tissue. With the needle probes used in the present study, surgical excision was not required to provide access to the medulla, and it was thus possible to observe simultaneously the MBF and urinary excretory responses to changes in RAP.

Although LDF has provided the means to study dynamic regional blood flow responses within specific sites in an organ, some potential limitations of this technique remain. One concern is that measurements with the LDF needle probe do not provide an absolute measure of blood flow. However, the relative changes in blood flow signals from the LDF needle probes in response to various vasoactive agents were found to be closely correlated (Fig 2Up and References 6, 13, and 156 13 15 ) to the changes in total RBF. Moreover, it was observed that the LDF signals obtained from the cortical tissue were substantially greater (approximately three times) than the signals from medullary tissue (Fig 1Up), in general agreement with the well-recognized differences in CBF and MBF when expressed per gram of tissue (for review, see Reference 2121 ). Thus, the available data indicate that LDF methodology can provide a good indication of changes in regional blood flow within renal tissue. However, signals from the LDF needle probe also depend on a number of factors, such as hematocrit, tissue morphology, and vessel alignment.22 It is possible that changes in hematocrit affect the magnitude of the LDF signals, as this depends on red blood cell flux (numberxvelocity of red blood cells) in the volume of tissue sampled by the LDF probe. In the present study, hematocrit clearly decreased during acute saline loading, and this could have diminished the relative changes observed after volume expansion. However, hematocrit values did not change during stabilized periods when responses to stepwise reductions in RAP were examined both before and after volume expansion. It is also possible that alterations in the vascular component of the unit volume sampled by LDF needle probes could lead to a change in the magnitude of LDF signals. However, total RBF remained unchanged within the autoregulatory range, and net renal volume did not change perceptibly during alterations in RAP. Thus, a change in unit volume sampled by the LDF probe may be insignificant in producing a discernible change in LDF signals. However, direct assessment of the implications of various physical factors in the renal tissue on the absolute LDF signals may not be possible in the context of the present study.

Studies in rats6 7 23 reported that during volume expansion with isotonic saline, the autoregulatory efficiency in renal MBF was reduced, as recorded by LDF. As these volume-expanded rats exhibited an exaggerated pressure-natriuresis response, it was postulated that the changes in MBF may mediate the enhanced natriuretic responses to changes in arterial pressure. However, direct correlations between the changes in MBF and UNaV in response to alterations in RAP were not shown.6 7 23 Little information is available related to MBF responses to volume expansion in dogs. In the present study, we did not observe a significant increase in MBF during volume expansion in dogs. In addition, MBF exhibited efficient autoregulation similar to that seen during control measurements. At present, we have no satisfactory explanation for the differences between the results obtained in dogs and rats. Species differences in medullary morphology could help explain these contrasting findings. The long papilla of the rat, which is distinct from that in the dog, may exhibit different hemodynamic responses.6 7 23 It can be argued that differences in methodological approaches may be partially responsible for the differences between the findings in the dog and rat. In the present study, needle probes were inserted directly into the tissue, whereas the previous studies in rats relied on implanted optical fibers.6 However, it seems unlikely that this factor is responsible for the differences observed because both the needle probes and the optical fibers should be able to respond to the same volume of tissue in front of the tip. Moreover, MBF measured with optical fiber probes in anesthetized dogs14 also showed efficient autoregulatory behavior in agreement with the present study. We also demonstrated that the changes in MBF recorded by LDF needle probes in response to various vasoactive agents were closely correlated with the changes in total RBF recorded with electromagnetic flow probes (Fig 2Up). Mattson et al6 reported similar sensitivity with LDF optical fiber probes in rat MBF. The needle probes were clearly able to reflect changes in MBF autoregulatory behavior when they occurred during calcium channel blockade (Fig 7Up) or when RAP was reduced below the autoregulatory range.13 Finally, studies conducted in our laboratory have also demonstrated that intrarenal administration of other vasodilator agents—bradykinin, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors,24 and adrenomedullin15 —elicit increases in MBF.

Another factor that should be considered is that possible elevations of circulating levels of catecholamines, vasopressin, plasma renin activity, or Ang II in these dogs subjected to partial occlusion of the common carotid arteries may have influenced the MBF responses in the present study. Although we did not measure the circulating levels of these hormones in this study, it should be noted that we performed partial carotid constriction to raise systemic arterial pressure at least 45 minutes before the start of the experimental protocol and maintained this occlusion throughout the experimental period. During this period, systemic arterial pressure remained stable. Thus, it seems unlikely that subtle fluctuations in the release of catecholamines and vasopressin might influence the MBF response to selective changes in renal perfusion pressure elicited with a renal arterial occluder. Previous studies in rats7 have demonstrated that arterial pressure–dependent changes in MBF can be observed in animals maintained at fixed high levels of these hormones achieved by their continuous infusion. It is also unlikely that a vasoconstrictor effect of increases in intrarenal Ang II levels on MBF in these dogs subjected to partial carotid occlusion influenced the MBF responses because such effects would have led to progressive decreases in MBF with decreases in renal perfusion pressure and would have counteracted rather than been responsible for the high degree of autoregulatory efficiency observed. In addition, the dogs were given a high sodium diet before the experiment and then subsequently were infused with a large isotonic saline load. Clearly, the dogs used in this study were not hypovolemic, as they exhibited high FENa, confirming that they were in a sodium-replete state. The marked reductions in plasma protein concentrations (15%) and colloid osmotic pressure in response to saline loading, which were comparable to the changes observed in a previous study,18 clearly demonstrated the adequacy of the volume expansion in this group of dogs.

Several mechanisms have been considered to explain the loss of MBF autoregulatory behavior in volume-expanded rats.6 7 18 It has been reported that the loss of MBF autoregulatory efficiency in rats was restored by inhibition of NO synthase.25 A possible role for prostaglandins was also indicated, as it was shown that indomethacin treatment also restored MBF autoregulatory efficiency in rats.26 Thus, both of these paracrine factors may play a role in determining the autoregulatory ability of MBF in rats. In studies by Salazar et al17 and Alberola et al16 in anesthetized dogs, it was reported that both prostaglandins and NO were involved in mediating sodium excretory responses to acute volume expansion with isotonic saline. In the present study, volume expansion also caused enhancement of endogenous NO production, as evidenced by slight but significant increases in the urinary excretion rate of NO3-/NO2-. This slight increase in NO production could have contributed partly to the increases in urine flow and UNaV. Although some studies in rats27 indicate that intrarenal production of NO may be greater in the renal medulla than in the cortex, this has not been examined in dogs. Recently, we have reported15 that inhibition of NO synthesis in anesthetized dogs resulted in similar reductions in both CBF (28%) and MBF (27%) in the kidney. Of interest, a recent study in rats by Mohaupt et al28 has shown that the inducible NO synthase isoform is constitutively expressed in abundance in the medullary thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Thus, the medullary ascending limb of the loop of Henle could be a source of the high NO levels, which may be trapped more efficiently in the medulla of the rat.

Although the mechanism of pressure natriuresis is not yet clearly defined, several recent studies9 10 11 12 have suggested that changes in intrarenal NO activity during changes in arterial pressure may be involved in mediating the pressure-natriuresis response. This is supported further by the present findings showing a significant correlation between RAP and urinary excretion rate of NO3-/NO2- during both control and volume-expanded conditions. Increases in NO release during increases in RAP could occur as a consequence of increases in shear stress in the vessel wall during autoregulatory adjustments in arteriolar resistance.29 30 The increased NO production would raise the tissue levels31 and could thus serve as an important mediator of the natriuretic responses by influencing tubular transport directly32 33 and/or altering the intrarenal hemodynamic environment.2 27 34 Changes in renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure in response to changes in RAP have been suggested to be involved in mediating the change in tubular transport.2 28 As we did not measure the changes in renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure in this study, however, we cannot provide data regarding changes in this parameter under conditions in which there is highly efficient autoregulation of total RBF, CBF, and MBF.

In conclusion, the results of the present investigation demonstrate that the changes in UNaV in response to alterations in arterial pressure both during a control sodium-replete state and after acute extracellular volume expansion occur in the presence of efficient autoregulation of renal MBF as well as CBF in dogs. Thus, the data indicate that the mechanism of pressure natriuresis does not depend on coincident changes in MBF.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
Ang II = angiotensin II
CBF = cortical blood flow
FENa = fractional excretion of sodium
GFR = glomerular filtration rate
LDF = laser-Doppler flowmetry
MBF = medullary blood flow
NO = nitric oxide
RAP = renal arterial pressure
RBF = renal blood flow
UNaV = urinary sodium excretion


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by a Young Investigator Grant from the National Kidney Foundation, a grant from the Louisiana Education Quality Support Fund (LEQSF), and grants HL-51306 and HL-18426 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health. The authors are grateful to George Prophet for technical assistance and Agnes C. Buffone for preparing the manuscript.

Received September 19, 1995; first decision December 4, 1995; accepted July 15, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Firth JD, Raine AEG, Ledingham JGG. Editorial review: the mechanism of pressure natriuresis. J Hypertens. 1990;8:97-103. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Granger JP. Pressure natriuresis: role of renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl I):I-9-I-17.

3. Navar LG, Paul RV, Carmines PK, Chou C-L, Marsh DJ. Intrarenal mechanisms mediating pressure natriuresis: role of angiotensin and prostaglandins. Fed Proc. 1986;45:2885-2891. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Romero JC, Knox FG. Mechanisms underlying pressure-related natriuresis: the role of the renin-angiotensin and prostaglandin systems: state of the art lecture. Hypertension. 1988;11:724-738. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Cowley AW Jr. Long-term control of arterial blood pressure. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:231-300. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Mattson DL, Lu S, Roman RJ, Cowley AW Jr. Relationship between renal perfusion pressure and blood flow in different regions of the kidney. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:R578-R583. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Roman RJ, Cowley AW Jr, Garcia-Estan J, Lombard JH. Pressure-diuresis in volume-expanded rats: cortical and medullary hemodynamics. Hypertension. 1988;12:168-176. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Strick DM, Fiksen-Olsen MJ, Lockhart JC, Roman RJ, Romero JC. Direct measurement of renal medullary blood flow in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:R253-R259. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Majid DSA, Godfrey M, Grisham MB, Navar LG. Relation between pressure natriuresis and urinary excretion of nitrate/nitrite in anesthetized dogs. Hypertension. 1995;25(part 2):860-865.

10. Majid DSA, Williams A, Kadowitz PJ, Navar LG. Renal responses to intra-arterial administration of nitric oxide donor in dogs. Hypertension. 1993;22:535-541. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Majid DSA, Williams A, Navar LG. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis attenuates pressure-induced natriuretic responses in anesthetized dogs. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F79-F87. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Salom MG, Lahera V, Miranda-Guardiola F, Romero JC. Blockade of pressure natriuresis induced by inhibition of renal synthesis of nitric oxide in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:F718-F722. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Majid DSA, Navar LG. Medullary blood flow responses to changes in arterial pressure in canine kidney. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:F833-F838. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Osborn JL, Whitehouse DP, Plato CF. Intrarenal AT1 receptor blockade enhances renal autoregulation in anesthetized dogs. FASEB J. 1996;10:A372. Abstract.

15. Majid DSA, Kadowitz PJ, Coy DH, Navar LG. Renal responses to intra-arterial administration of adrenomedullin in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:F200-F205. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Alberola A, Pinilla JM, Quesada T, Romero JC, Salom MG, Salazar FJ. Role of nitric oxide in mediating renal response to volume expansion. Hypertension. 1992;19:780-784. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Salazar FJ, Llinas MT, Gonzalez JD, Quesada T, Pinilla JM. Role of prostaglandins and nitric oxide in mediating renal response to volume expansion. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R1442-R1448. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Cowley AW Jr, Skelton MM. Dominance of colloid osmotic pressure in renal excretion after isotonic volume expansion. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:H1214-H1225. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Faubert PF, Chou SY, Porush JG. Regulation of papillary plasma flow by angiotensin II. Kidney Int. 1987;32:472-478. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Navar LG, Champion WJ, Thomas CE. Effects of calcium channel responses to changes in perfusion pressure and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in dogs. Circ Res. 1986;58:874-881. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Navar LG, Evan AP, Rosivall L. Microcirculation of the kidney. In: The Physiology and Pharmacology of the Microcirculation. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc; 1983;1:397-488.

22. Smits GJ, Roman RJ, Lombard JH. Evaluation of laser-Doppler flowmetry as a measure of tissue blood flow. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:666-672. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Fenoy FJ, Roman RJ. Effect of volume expansion on papillary blood flow and sodium excretion. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:F813-F822. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Omoro SA, Walker M, El-Dahr SS, Majid DSA, Navar LG. Renal medullary blood flow (MBF) responses to angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition during bradykinin B2 receptor blockade in anesthetized dogs. FASEB J. 1996;10:A396. Abstract.

25. Fenoy FJ, Ferrer P, Carbonell L, García-Salom M. Role of nitric oxide on papillary blood flow and pressure natriuresis. Hypertension. 1995;25:408-414. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Parekh N, Zou A-P, Jüngling I, Endlich K, Sadowski J, Steinhausen M. Sex differences in control of renal outer medullary circulation in rats: role of prostaglandins. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F629-F636. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Mattson DL, Roman RJ, Cowley AW Jr. Role of nitric oxide in renal papillary blood flow and sodium excretion. Hypertension. 1992;19:766-769. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Mohaupt MG, Elzie JL, Ahn KY, Clapp WL, Wilcox CS, Kone BC. Differential expression and induction of mRNAs encoding two inducible nitric oxide synthases in rat kidney. Kidney Int. 1994;46:653-665. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Furchgott RF, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting factors. FASEB J. 1989;3:2007-2018. [Abstract]

30. Kuchan MJ, Frangos JA. Role of calcium and calmodulin in flow-induced nitric oxide production in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:C628-C636. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Lancaster JR Jr. Simulation of the diffusion and reaction of endogenously produced nitric oxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:8137-8141. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Stoos BA, Carretero OA, Garvin JL. Endothelial-derived nitric oxide inhibits sodium transport by affecting apical membrane channels in cultured collecting duct cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1994;4:1855-1860.[Abstract]

33. Stoos BA, Garcia NH, Garvin JL. Nitric oxide inhibits sodium reabsorption in the isolated perfused cortical collecting duct. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995;6:89-94. [Abstract]

34. Garcia-Estan J, Roman RJ. Role of renal interstitial hydrostatic pressure in the pressure diuresis response. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:F63-F70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
Z. Zhang and T. L. Pallone
Response of descending vasa recta to luminal pressure
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): F535 - F542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. F. Reckelhoff and J. C. Romero
Role of oxidative stress in angiotensin-induced hypertension
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R893 - R912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. L. Mattson
Importance of the renal medullary circulation in the control of sodium excretion and blood pressure
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R13 - R27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. A. Eppel, G. Bergstrom, W. P. Anderson, and R. G. Evans
Autoregulation of renal medullary blood flow in rabbits
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R233 - R244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. S.A. Majid and A. Nishiyama
Nitric Oxide Blockade Enhances Renal Responses to Superoxide Dismutase Inhibition in Dogs
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 293 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. S. A. Majid, K. E. Said, S. A. Omoro, and L. G. Navar
Nitric Oxide Dependency of Arterial Pressure-Induced Changes in Renal Interstitial Hydrostatic Pressure in Dogs
Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88(3): 347 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. A. Omoro, D. S. A. Majid, S. S. El Dahr, and L. G. Navar
Roles of ANG II and bradykinin in the renal regional blood flow responses to ACE inhibition in sodium-depleted dogs
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, August 1, 2000; 279(2): F289 - F293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. S. A. Majid, K. E. Said, and S. A. Omoro
Responses to Acute Changes in Arterial Pressure on Renal Medullary Nitric Oxide Activity in Dogs
Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 832 - 836.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. G. Correia, G. Bergstrom, A. J. Lawrence, and R. G. Evans
Renal medullary interstitial infusion of norepinephrine in anesthetized rabbits: methodological considerations
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 1999; 277(1): R112 - R122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. A. Omoro, D. S. A. Majid, S. S. El-Dahr, and L. G. Navar
Kinin influences on renal regional blood flow responses to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in dogs
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): F271 - F277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. Nafz, K. Berger, C. Rosler, and P. B. Persson
Kinins modulate the sodium-dependent autoregulation of renal medullary blood flow
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 1998; 40(3): 573 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. S. A. Majid, S. A. Omoro, S. Y. Chin, and L. G. Navar
Intrarenal Nitric Oxide Activity and Pressure Natriuresis in Anesthetized Dogs
Hypertension, August 1, 1998; 32(2): 266 - 272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Majid, D. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Navar, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Majid, D. S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Navar, L. G.