| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 1997;29:913-917.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus University Medical School, and the Department of Epidemiology, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam Area (A.A.J.M.H.), Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: adolescence blood pressure sodium, dietary follow-up studies infant nutrition
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a randomized, double-blind trial among 476 newborn Dutch infants conducted in 1980, sodium intake was positively related to BP during the first 6 months of life.7 In the present analysis, we investigated whether contrasting levels of sodium intake in infancy are still associated with BP differences later in life. For this purpose, BP in 167 youngsters who had participated in the original trial was measured again after 15 years of follow-up. In addition, possible modification of the effect of sodium on BP by sex, BMI, and resting HR was investigated.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The average daily amount of sodium (±SD) consumed during the trial amounted to 0.89±0.26 mol in the low sodium group and 2.50±0.95 mol in the normal sodium group. After 25 weeks of intervention, systolic BP in the low sodium group was 2.1 mm Hg lower (90% CI, -3.7 to -0.5, P1=.01) than in the normal sodium group after adjustment for weight and length at birth, systolic BP in the first week, and BP observers.
Subjects for the Follow-up Study
A total of 466 infants (98%) completed the trial and were
eligible for the present follow-up study. The current addresses of 185
children could not be traced. Seventy-one children had moved out of
Zoetermeer, and they were not invited for logistic reasons. Eleven
children could not be contacted by telephone. A total of 199 children
was contacted (45% of those eligible). Twelve children refused
participation. Twenty children could not participate because of
illness, holiday, or other activities. A total of 167 children (84% of
those contacted) agreed to participate, and they visited the study
center for BP measurements. Of those, 71 children had initially been
assigned to the low sodium group and 96 to the normal sodium group. All
subjects gave informed consent.
Follow-up Measurements
BP and HR were measured on the right arm by two investigators
using an automatic device (Dinamap model 8100, Critikon Inc) while the
participant was seated. After at least 5 minutes of rest, four
measurements of BP and HR were made; the last three were averaged and
used in the present analysis. The observers did not know the original
group assignment of the participants. Body weight and height were
measured with participants not wearing heavy clothing and shoes. BMI
was computed as weight divided by height squared.
During the center visit, the participant filled in a questionnaire regarding the use of medication, frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption, and amount of physical activity (sports, biking, and walking) and education at the time of follow-up. Girls additionally filled in the age at menarche. We also asked about antihypertensive treatment in parents and whether a salt-restricted diet was consumed at home. If the parents joined their child at the center visit, they provided this information themselves. When items on the questionnaire were left blank because the participant did not know the information requested, attempts were made to obtain this information from a parent by means of a telephone call. The educational level of the participants was rated on a five-point scale according to the Dutch school system for secondary education, ranging from lower vocational education to preuniversity education. The highest achieved education of both parents was assessed on a nine-point scale, ranging from primary school to university. The current educational level of the participant and the highest achieved educational level of the parents were recoded at three levels (low, average, and high) for data presentation. In the statistical analyses, the original rates were used.
The subjects collected an overnight urine sample after the center visit. Instructions were given both orally and in writing. The subjects were not informed about the purpose of the urine collection. Labeled containers were provided on which the subjects recorded the times the collection began and ended. When data were missing, they were obtained afterwards by means of a telephone call. The sample volume was measured at the study center. Urinary concentrations of sodium and potassium were determined by flame photometry with a Beckman KLiNa-flame device (Beckman Instruments Inc). Urinary creatinine concentration was measured by an automated semi-kinetic method based on a direct Jaffé procedure without deproteinization using a Kone Specific Analyzer and Kone reagents (Kone Corp Instrument Group). Electrolyte and creatinine excretions were standardized to 24-hour values.
Data Analysis
The present study population was regarded as a cohort with two
different levels of (experimentally manipulated) sodium intake early in
life. Exposure was based on the initial randomization code,
irrespective of subsequent protocol deviations or compliance. The
difference in BP between the study groups after 15 years of follow-up
was tested for statistical significance by means of a two-tailed
unpaired t test.
The loss to follow-up of subjects for the present study, although for reasons unrelated to the object of the research, introduced unequal distributions of baseline and follow-up characteristics between the study groups. Therefore, we performed a second analysis, taking potential confounders into account. We used a multiple linear regression model, with systolic and diastolic BPs as the outcome variables. We made adjustments for sex, birth length and weight, maternal educational level, maternal systolic BP at baseline, educational level of the participant, presence of treated hypertension in parents, and BP observers. An indicator for the sodium group (0=low, 1=normal) was entered as an independent variable. The regression coefficient for the sodium group yielded by this model estimates the adjusted BP difference between the sodium groups.
The analyses were repeated for boys and girls separately and in BMI and resting HR strata. The strata were formed by dividing the participants into two groups according to the sex-specific median of the BMI and HR distribution at follow-up, respectively. The differences in BP are given with 95% CI and two-sided P values.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The characteristics of the participants after 15 years of follow-up are
given in Table 2
. No significant differences in body
height and weight, BMI, and physical activity were observed between the
study groups. The frequencies of smoking and alcohol consumption were
similarly distributed over the groups. Among girls, the age at menarche
was not significantly different between the groups. Significantly more
participants in the low sodium group than the normal sodium group
reported having a parent currently treated for hypertension. None of
the participants reported antihypertensive treatment in both parents.
The subjects in the low sodium group had significantly lower education
than the control subjects. Urinary excretions of sodium and potassium
in both groups were low. Urinary electrolyte values were lowest in the
low sodium group but not significantly different from the values in the
normal sodium group. Urinary sodium-potassium ratio and creatinine
excretion were similar in both groups. One participant in each study
group reported being on a salt-restricted diet (data not presented in
table).
|
Table 3
shows the differences in BP between the study
groups after 15 years of follow-up. Systolic and diastolic BP levels
were slightly lower in the low sodium group than the control group, but
the differences were not statistically significant. After adjustment
for potential confounders (indicated in Table 3
), systolic BP was
3.6 mm Hg lower (95% CI, -6.6 to -0.5,
P2=.02) and diastolic BP was 2.2 mm Hg
lower (95% CI, -4.5 to 0.2, P2=.08) in the low
sodium group than the control group. The change in regression
coefficients after adjustment in the multivariate model was
attributable to the inclusion of birth length and weight, maternal
educational level, maternal systolic BP, and presence of treated
hypertension in parents. A small additional change was observed after
further adjustment for the educational level of the participant, sex,
and BP observers. When sodium and potassium excretions were
additionally included in the model (with or without correction for
creatinine excretion), the results did not change. The regression
coefficient for sodium group did not differ significantly between boys
and girls or between subjects with a low or high BMI.
|
The Figure
presents the results within resting HR strata
at follow-up. When the analysis was restricted to subjects with an HR
above the sex-specific median (76 beats per minute for boys and 83 for
girls), the adjusted differences in BP between the sodium groups were
-6.0 mm Hg (95% CI, -10.5 to -1.5,
P2=.01) for systolic and -4.8 mm Hg (95%
CI, -8.7 to -0.9, P2=.02) for diastolic BP. In
subjects with an HR lower than the median, the differences in BP were
small (0.8 and 1.7 mm Hg for systolic and diastolic BPs,
respectively) and not statistically significant.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The children remeasured for the present analysis form a subgroup of the original population that participated in a double-blind, randomized trial of low versus normal sodium intake.7 As such, the present study is a cohort study in which the contrast in baseline exposure, ie, neonatal sodium intake, has been experimentally achieved. Forty percent of the subjects initially assigned to the normal sodium group and 31% of the subjects in the low sodium group participated in the follow-up study. Whereas the study groups in the original trial were similar with regard to birth length and weight, maternal systolic BP, and maternal educational level, these variables differed significantly between the sodium groups in the follow-up study. Furthermore, the subjects in the low sodium group appeared to have less education and more often reported antihypertensive treatment in their parents. These observed differences could be related to the change in BP during childhood. The mother's systolic BP level at baseline, for example, appeared to be positively associated with the child's BP 15 years later in our study. Other researchers8 have also reported a significant correlation of maternal BP with BP in the adolescent child. Because the maternal BP level at baseline was higher in our low sodium group than the control group, the intervention-related difference in BP levels at follow-up was reduced. To reliably estimate the true effect of neonatal sodium intake on future BP, we repeated the analysis using a multivariate model that included all potential confounders. The conclusions of the present study are based on the adjusted BP differences obtained from the multivariate analysis.
We cannot infer from our findings which mechanism has led to higher BP in the normal sodium group. Possibly, differences in electrolyte intake between the study groups subsequent to the trial may have contributed to the differences in BP level at follow-up. However, there are several factors that do not favor a behavioral change. All babies had to adapt to a diet with a regular amount of salt after the trial, as the low sodium baby foods were not commercially available. Furthermore, the daily diet of the youngsters in the follow-up study to a large extent depended on their mothers' food choices and cooking habits. Although it is possible that some mothers changed the family's diet because of the trial, it is unlikely that this occurred differentially according to the study group to which the child had belonged. To get an indication of dietary electrolyte intake at the time of follow-up, the participants collected an overnight urine sample. No significant differences in sodium and potassium excretions as well as sodium-potassium ratio were observed. The mean sodium-potassium ratios in both groups were around 3.3, which is comparable to the average urinary sodium-potassium ratios in a Dutch cohort of children with more than 7 yearly measurements.9 Sodium and potassium excretions in both groups appeared to be relatively low, for which we have no explanation. No irregularities in the collection procedure or laboratory methods could be detected. Twenty-four-hour collections would probably have yielded a better estimate of habitual sodium and potassium intakes. Unfortunately, this appeared not to be feasible in these youngsters because of frequent outdoor activities. The urinary sodium-potassium ratio, which we consider the most important determinant of BP in this age group,9 is not likely to be affected largely by the relatively low values for urinary sodium and potassium or by the overnight sampling. We therefore think that we can validly infer from these data that the diets in both groups at the time of follow-up did not differ to a great extent with regard to their sodium-potassium balance. It would have been interesting to study possible differences in salt taste threshold or preference level between the low sodium and control groups after the trial. This, however, requires careful chemosensoric investigations and assessment of electrolyte intakes early and later in life. We did not obtain these data in our study.
Possibly, salt intake interacts with the sympathetic nervous system in determining BP level.10 DiBona11 suggested an interaction between intake of dietary sodium, environmental stress, and sympathetic neural control of renal function as part of the early hypertensive process. Staessen et al,12 in a population study, found a significant positive association between 24-hour urinary sodium and BP in subjects with high HRs, whereas an opposite tendency was observed in people with lower HRs. This interaction may also underlie the observed BP difference in our study, as the BP effect appeared to be restricted to participants with higher resting HR. It should be noted, however, that the stratification in our study was performed on HR measured at the time of follow-up and not on baseline values. We considered the HR at 15 years of age a better indicator of sympathetic nervous system activity than the HR measured in the early neonatal period. Because we did not stratify on HR before the intervention, it could be hypothesized that salt intake had an effect on BP through influencing HR. If this were true, however, the BP difference should no longer be observed within HR strata. Our findings show the opposite and therefore do not support an intermediate role for HR in the salt-BP relation. Alternatively, if HR is correlated with BP, the differences in HR between the groups at follow-up could be a marker for the BP response to the sodium intervention. This may explain why the BP effect was present only in the high HR stratum. Because we cannot exclude this alternative explanation, the results from the stratified analysis should be interpreted with caution.
Several alternative explanations for the observed BP difference in our study could be given. Exposure to high sodium levels in infancy may damage the immature kidney tissue, which in turn could adversely affect the development of BP during growth and maturation.13 The higher BP levels in the normal sodium group may also be explained by an alteration in renal sodium handling, resulting from early changes in renal hemodynamics. In line with this hypothesis, an increased renal vasoconstriction and decreased renin and aldosterone secretions have been observed in young offspring of hypertensive parents.14
Environmental exposures in utero and in infancy may be more important in relation to cardiovascular disease than exposures in adulthood, as "programming" of different systems and organs in the body occurs very early in life.15 Evidence is accumulating that birth weight is inversely related to the risk of hypertension later in life.16 17 18 The present study suggests that neonatal sodium intake could be related to BP level in adolescence. Data on the effect of nutrient intake in infancy on future BP are scarce. Studies in this field may provide clues for the prevention of hypertension in Westernized societies and a further understanding of its causes.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 6, 1996; first decision June 27, 1996; accepted October 10, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Berenson GS, Cresanta JL, Webber LS. High blood pressure in the young. Annu Rev Med. 1984;35:535-560. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Labarthe DR. Blood pressure studies in children throughout the world. In: Gross F, Strasser T, eds. Mild Hypertension. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1983:85-96.
4.
Zinner S, Rosner B, Oh W, Kass E. Significance
of blood pressure in infancy: familial aggregation and predictive
effect on later blood pressure. Hypertension. 1985;7:411-416.
5.
Gillman MW, Rosner B, Evans DA, Keough ME, Smith LA,
Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Use of multiple visits to increase
blood pressure tracking correlations in childhood.
Pediatrics. 1991;87:708-711.
6. Prineas RJ, Sinaiko AR. Hypertension in children. In: Swales JD, ed. Textbook of Hypertension.Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1994:750-766.
7.
Hofman A, Hazebroek A, Valkenburg HA. A
randomized trial ofsodium intake and blood pressure in newborn
infants. JAMA. 1983;250:370-373.
8.
Miller JZ, Weinberger MH, Christian JC, Daugherty
SA. Familial resemblance in the blood pressure response to
sodium restriction. Am J Epidemiol. 1987;126:822-830.
9. Geleijnse JM, Grobbee DE, Hofman A. Sodium and potassium intake and blood pressure change in childhood. BMJ. 1990;300:899-902.
10. Poulter NR, Shipley MJ, Bulpitt CJ, Markowe HL, Marmot MG. Pulse rate and twenty-four hour urinary sodium content interact to determine blood pressure levels of male London civil servants. J Hypertens Suppl. 1988;6:611-613.
11. DiBona GF. Sympathetic neural control of the kidney in hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;19(suppl I):I-28-I-35.
12. Staessen J, Bulpitt CJ, Thijs L, Fagard R, Joosens JV, van Hoof R, Amery A. Pulse rate and sodium intake interact to determine blood pressure: a population study. Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:107-112. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Brenner BM, Chertow GM. Congenital oligonephropathy and the etiology of adult hypertension and progressive renal injury. Am J Kidney Dis. 1994;23:171-175. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Van Hooft IMS, Grobbee DE, Derkx FHM, de Leeuw PW, Schalekamp MADH, Hofman A. Renal haemodynamics and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in early phase of primary hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1305-1311. [Abstract]
15. Myers MM, Shair HN, Hofer MA. Feeding in infancy: short- and long-term effects on cardiovascular function. Experientia. 1992;48:322-333. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Barker DJP. The fetal origins of adult hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 7):39-44.
17. Godfrey KM, Forrester T, Barker DJ, Jackson AA, Landman JP, Hall JS, Cox V, Osmond C. Maternal nutritional status in pregnancy and blood pressure in childhood. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:398-403. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Whincup P, Cook D, Papacosta O, Walker M. Birth
weight and blood pressure: cross sectional and longitudinal relations
in childhood. BMJ. 1995;311:773-776.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. J Brown, I. Tzoulaki, V. Candeias, and P. Elliott Salt intakes around the world: implications for public health Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2009; 38(3): 791 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Niinikoski, A. Jula, J. Viikari, T. Ronnemaa, P. Heino, H. Lagstrom, E. Jokinen, and O. Simell Blood Pressure Is Lower in Children and Adolescents With a Low-Saturated-Fat Diet Since Infancy: The Special Turku Coronary Risk Factor Intervention Project Hypertension, June 1, 2009; 53(6): 918 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Tzemos, P. O. Lim, S. Wong, A. D. Struthers, and T. M. MacDonald Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Acute Salt Loading in Young Normotensive Individuals Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1525 - 1530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G D. Batty, G. D. Smith, C. H D Fall, A. A. Sayer, E. Dennison, C. Cooper, and C. R Gale Association of diarrhoea in childhood with blood pressure and coronary heart disease in older age: analyses of two UK cohort studies Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R Cook, J. A Cutler, E. Obarzanek, J. E Buring, K. M Rexrode, S. K Kumanyika, L. J Appel, and P. K Whelton Long term effects of dietary sodium reduction on cardiovascular disease outcomes: observational follow-up of the trials of hypertension prevention (TOHP) BMJ, April 28, 2007; 334(7599): 885 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chiolero, P. Bovet, G. Paradis, and F. Paccaud Has Blood Pressure Increased in Children in Response to the Obesity Epidemic? Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 544 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Stein, M. Wang, M. Ramirez-Zea, R. Flores, R. Grajeda, P. Melgar, U. Ramakrishnan, and R. Martorell Exposure to a Nutrition Supplementation Intervention in Early Childhood and Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Adulthood: Evidence from Guatemala Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2006; 164(12): 1160 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. He and G. A. MacGregor Importance of Salt in Determining Blood Pressure in Children: Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 861 - 869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Cutler and E. J. Roccella Salt Reduction for Preventing Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease: A Population Approach Should Include Children Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 818 - 819. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ritz Salt--friend or foe? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2052 - 2056. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Davey Smith, S. Leary, S. Ness, and The ALSPAC Study Team Could dehydration in infancy lead to high blood pressure? J Epidemiol Community Health, February 1, 2006; 60(2): 142 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D A Lawlor, C J Riddoch, A S Page, L B Andersen, N Wedderkopp, M Harro, D Stansbie, and G Davey Smith Infant feeding and components of the metabolic syndrome: findings from the European Youth Heart Study Arch. Dis. Child., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 582 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Meneton, X. Jeunemaitre, H. E. de Wardener, and G. A. Macgregor Links Between Dietary Salt Intake, Renal Salt Handling, Blood Pressure, and Cardiovascular Diseases Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 679 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Martin, D. Gunnell, and G. Davey Smith Breastfeeding in Infancy and Blood Pressure in Later Life: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Am. J. Epidemiol., January 1, 2005; 161(1): 15 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Fields, V. L. Burt, J. A. Cutler, J. Hughes, E. J. Roccella, and P. Sorlie The Burden of Adult Hypertension in the United States 1999 to 2000: A Rising Tide Hypertension, October 1, 2004; 44(4): 398 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Wor The Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents Pediatrics, August 1, 2004; 114(2/S2): 555 - 576. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Watkins, P. McCarron, L. Murray, G. Cran, C. Boreham, P. Robson, C. McGartland, G. D. Smith, and M. Savage Trends in blood pressure over 10 years in adolescents: analyses of cross sectional surveys in the Northern Ireland Young Hearts project BMJ, July 17, 2004; 329(7458): 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Martin, A. R. Ness, D. Gunnell, P. Emmett, G. D. Smith, and for the ALSPAC Study Team Does Breast-Feeding in Infancy Lower Blood Pressure in Childhood?: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1259 - 1266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G Owen, P. H Whincup, J. A Gilg, and D. G Cook Effect of breast feeding in infancy on blood pressure in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ, November 22, 2003; 327(7425): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M Martin, A. McCarthy, G. D. Smith, D. P Davies, and Y. Ben-Shlomo Infant nutrition and blood pressure in early adulthood: the Barry Caerphilly Growth study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2003; 77(6): 1489 - 1497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Barlassina, C. Lanzani, P. Manunta, and G. Bianchi Genetics of Essential Hypertension: From Families to Genes J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2002; 13(90003): S155 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Zinner, S. T. McGarvey, L. P. Lipsitt, and B. Rosner Neonatal Blood Pressure and Salt Taste Responsiveness Hypertension, September 1, 2002; 40(3): 280 - 285. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Benjamin, S. C. Smith Jr, R. S. Cooper, M. N. Hill, and R. V. Luepker Task Force #1--magnitude of the prevention problem: opportunities and challenges J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 21, 2002; 40(4): 588 - 603. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Elliott and J. Stamler Commentary: Evidence on salt and blood pressure is consistent and persuasive Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2002; 31(2): 316 - 319. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. McCarron, M. Okasha, J. McEwen, G. D. Smith, and B. Neal Changes in blood pressure among students attending Glasgow University between 1948 and 1968: analyses of cross sectional surveys Commentary: Changing population blood pressure levels BMJ, April 14, 2001; 322(7291): 885 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. M Kaplan The dietary guideline for sodium: should we shake it up? No Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2000; 71(5): 1020 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. He, P. K. Whelton, L. J. Appel, J. Charleston, and M. J. Klag Long-Term Effects of Weight Loss and Dietary Sodium Reduction on Incidence of Hypertension Hypertension, February 1, 2000; 35(2): 544 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Hunt, N. R. Cook, A. Oberman, J. A. Cutler, C. H. Hennekens, P. S. Allender, W. G. Walker, P. K. Whelton, and R. R. Williams Angiotensinogen Genotype, Sodium Reduction, Weight Loss, and Prevention of Hypertension : Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase II Hypertension, September 1, 1998; 32(3): 393 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Kotchen and D. A. McCarron Dietary Electrolytes and Blood Pressure : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee Circulation, August 11, 1998; 98(6): 613 - 617. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Kotchen and J. M. Kotchen Regional Variations of Blood Pressure : Environment or Genes? Circulation, August 19, 1997; 96(4): 1071 - 1073. [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |