Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1997;29:980-985

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seely, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seely, E. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure

(Hypertension. 1997;29:980-985.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Age, Gender, and Non-modulation

A Sexual Dimorphism in Essential Hypertension

Naomi D. L. Fisher; Claudio Ferri; Cesare Bellini; Anna Santucci; Ray Gleason; Gordon H. Williams; Norman K. Hollenberg; ; Ellen W. Seely

From the Departments of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass, and Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Correspondence to Naomi D.L. Fisher, Endocrine-Hypertension Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail ndfisher{at}bics.bwh.harvard.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract The angiotensinogen gene is one of the very few related by linkage analysis to human hypertension, but the linkage has been consistently shown only among males. Moreover, polymorphisms in this gene predict an abnormal renal responsiveness to angiotensin II, a feature of non-modulation, but again, only among males. To pursue these related bridges between genetics and physiology, we evaluated the effects of sex on a second feature of non-modulation, the aldosterone response to infused angiotensin II during low sodium balance. We tested the resultant hypothesis—that non-modulation would be less frequent in women—by conducting identical protocols on 225 hypertensive inpatients (70 women, 155 men). Non-modulation was strikingly less frequent among women (26%; 95% confidence interval, 16% to 37%) than men (49%; 95% confidence interval, 40% to 57%) (P=.001). We tested the hypothesis that sex steroids play a role by comparing young, premenopausal women (<35 years) with women who were perimenopausal (45 to 55 years) and postmenopausal (>55 years). Among the youngest women, the frequency of non-modulation was only 7%, significantly less than in young men (41%, P=.02). A steady increase in non-modulation frequency accompanied advancing age in women, reaching 47% in those older than 55 years, equal to the fraction of men affected. Age influenced non-modulation frequency in men far less. We conclude that a striking sex difference underlies the non-modulation phenotype and that female sex hormones may confer protection against a genotypic predisposition in women. This "override" of genotype, manifest by a very low frequency of non-modulation in young women, may participate in their known protection against cardiovascular disease.


Key Words: angiotensinogen • angiotensin II • sodium • genotype


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Sexual dimorphisms in essential and secondary hypertension are unequivocal.1 Until the age of 50 years, women have lower BP than men, but this protection disappears rapidly with increasing age. Recent studies in genetics and physiology provide some intriguing insights. AGT is one of the few genes related by linkage analysis to human hypertension, but in the largest study to date, linkage was found only among males.2 More recently, a common polymorphism in this gene associated with hypertension was found to predict abnormal renal vascular responsiveness to Ang II,3 one feature of the NM phenotype. Again, the effect of AGT genotype on renal vascular response was evident only among males. In contrast, phenotype did not depend on genotype among females, and females showed greater renal responsiveness to Ang II. Prompted by these observations, we undertook a systematic analysis of adrenal responsiveness to Ang II in 225 hypertensive men and women on the premise that sex would influence the expression of this genetic disorder. Our rationale reflected the possibility that the pattern of renal responsiveness in women represented a physiological process unrelated to NM. The results confirm a striking sex effect on the frequency of NM. The finding that younger women especially are protected against its expression promises a clue to the responsible mechanism.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We studied 225 individuals with essential hypertension (70 women and 155 men), with similar protocols in Boston, Mass, and Rome, Italy. Protocols were approved by the Human Subjects Committees at each site, and informed written consent was obtained from each subject. The women ranged in age from 18 to 66 years (43±1.4, mean±SE), and the men from 19 to 71 (45.6±1). Twenty-six of the participants were black, 196 white, 2 Indian, and 1 Japanese. Race was determined by self-identification and supported by physical appearance. The term black is used instead of African American because not all of the subjects were American.

Hypertension was defined as a seated systolic BP greater than 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP greater than 90 mm Hg measured manually with a standard mercury sphygmomanometer on at least three visits. All subjects were screened with a physical examination; laboratory tests, including serum electrolytes, liver function tests, and complete blood count; and electrocardiogram. Subjects with known or suspected secondary hypertension or with renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance <70 mL/min) were excluded from the study. Antihypertensive medications, if used, were discontinued at least 2 weeks before the study. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were discontinued 3 months before the study. All women were questioned about their use of hormone preparations. Six were taking estrogen, two for contraception and four for postmenopausal hormonal replacement therapy.

On admission to the metabolic ward, each subject was placed on a constant isocaloric diet of 10 mmol sodium and 100 mmol potassium, with 2000 mL water per day. Some subjects began their low sodium diet as outpatients. From admission, daily 24-hour urine collections were obtained for measurement of sodium, potassium, and creatinine. After 4 to 7 days, when external sodium balance had been achieved (urinary sodium equaling dietary sodium), upright posture studies and Ang II infusions were performed on separate days. Each study began at 8 AM, after the subjects had been fasting and recumbent overnight.

On the first study day during low salt balance, hormonal and hemodynamic responses to a postural stimulus were assessed in a subset of subjects. Blood was drawn from an intravenous catheter after subjects had been recumbent overnight and again after 2 hours in the standing position for measurement of PRA and plasma aldosterone concentration. BP and heart rate were monitored at the same time. Subjects with low-renin hypertension, defined by conventional criteria, were excluded from further study.

While remaining in low salt balance, on the next study day each subject received an infusion of Ang II amide (CIBA-Geigy) at 3 ng/kg per minute for 40 minutes, delivered by an electronic infusion pump (Baxter Corp). The dose of 3 ng/kg per minute was used because it has been found to stimulate aldosterone release with minimal pressor effects. Blood was drawn for measurement of PRA and plasma aldosterone, cortisol, and Ang II concentrations before and at the end of the Ang II infusion. During the infusion, BP was monitored every 2 minutes with an indirect recording sphygmomanometer.

Laboratory Procedures
Blood samples were collected on ice and spun immediately, and the plasma was frozen until assay. Serum and urinary sodium and potassium levels were measured by flame photometry, with lithium as an internal standard. Serum and urinary creatinine levels were measured by an autoanalyzer technique. PRA, aldosterone, Ang II, and cortisol were assayed by radioimmunoassay techniques previously described.4 5

Statistical Analyses
Subjects were classified as modulators or NM on the basis of formal analyses that have demonstrated NM to be a distinct subgroup of essential hypertension.6 We and others have previously defined NM as individuals in whom sodium intake fails to modify the responsiveness of the renal vasculature and adrenal gland to Ang II. Specific abnormalities defined in this subset include failure of sodium loading to enhance the renal vascular response to Ang II, failure of sodium loading to increase basal renal blood flow, and failure of sodium restriction to enhance adrenal responsiveness to Ang II. The present study assessed the increment in plasma aldosterone after infusion of Ang II (3 ng/kg per minute), shown to fit a bimodal distribution in the general hypertensive population, with modulators having a rise in aldosterone similar to that of normotensive subjects and NM having a much smaller increase (<416 pmol/L [<15 ng/dL]). This criterion is the most frequently applied. A subset of these individuals has been classified in previous publications.6 7 The data were not collected with an attempt to categorize women by menopausal status: follicle-stimulating hormone values were not obtained for all women, and many had undergone hysterectomy so that cessation of menses was prematurely induced. Because we postulated that sex hormones might underlie a large part of the observed sex differences in NM frequency, we analyzed women as four cohorts, with age as a surrogate for hormonal status. Those younger than 35 years were considered premenopausal; those between 35 and 45 years, predominantly premenopausal; those between 45 and 55 years, perimenopausal; and those older than 55 years, postmenopausal. To control for the effect of age, we grouped men in the same age brackets. The six women taking exogenous estrogen were analyzed separately, but their eventual inclusion did not affect the results. Sixteen percent of the women and 16% of the men had non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; their inclusion did not influence the results, and they were not removed.

Sex difference in the frequency of modulation status was analyzed by two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Two-tailed t tests were used for comparison of baseline variables and hormonal responses between sexes. Logistic regression was used for determination of which variables influenced the modulator-NM phenotype, which is a dichotomous variable. Group means are presented with the SE as the index of dispersion. The {alpha} level for significance was .05 or less.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Women and men had similar mean ages, body mass index, admission BP, and serum potassium and urinary sodium excretions during a low sodium intake (Table 1Down). As expected, men had significantly higher serum and urinary creatinine. Blacks added proportionately more women than men, but the number was very small. Urinary potassium excretion was higher among men.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Baseline Demographics

The overall frequency of NM among women was about half that of men (26% [95% CI, 16% to 37%] versus 49% [95% CI, 40% to 57%]) (P=.001, Fig 1Down). This difference was significant in both of the admitting centers analyzed separately. Basal plasma aldosterone concentration was similar between the sexes, but the response to Ang II infusion was dramatically different, with a rise of 1094±155 pmol/L (39.4±6 ng/dL) in the women, double that of the men (494±31 pmol/L [17.8±1.1 ng/dL], P=.0003) (Fig 2Down, Table 2Down). Sex also exerted a strong influence on adrenal responsiveness to a second stimulus, upright posture. As with Ang II infusion, the response of women (2003±250 pmol/L [72.2±9 ng/dL]) greatly exceeded that of men (1309±133 pmol/L [47.2±4.8 ng/dL]) (P=.01, Fig 2Down). There was no sex difference in either basal or responsive PRA or Ang II concentrations (upright PRA was 2.4±0.2 ng Ang I/L per second in women and 2.3±0.1 in men). Men had a higher plasma cortisol concentration both at baseline and after Ang II infusion (Table 2Down).



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of sex on NM. Frequency in men was twice as high as in women: 49% (95% CI, 40% to 57%) vs 26% (16% to 37%); P=.001.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Aldosterone response to two stimuli in women (black lines) and men (shaded lines). Despite identical basal plasma aldosterone concentrations, women had a significantly greater aldosterone response to Ang II infused at 3 ng/kg per minute (1094±155 pmol/L [39.4±6 ng/dL]), double that of men (494±31 pmol/L [17.8±1.1 ng/dL]) (P=.0003). The female response to 2 hours of upright posture also significantly exceeded that of men (2003±250 pmol/L [72.2±9 ng/dL] versus 1309±133 pmol/L [47.2±4.8 ng/dL]) (P=.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Response to Angiotensin II Infusion

A plot of individual aldosterone responses to Ang II infusion reveals the shift to greater values among the women (Fig 3Down). Notably, a subset of subjects with responses greater than 2080 pmol/L (75 ng/dL) were all women.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Individual aldosterone responses to Ang II infusion. Women had a significantly higher mean (39.4±5.6 vs 17.8±1.1 ng/dL) and median (26.6 vs 15.9 ng/dL) response than men. Note that the subset of "superresponders" (aldosterone increments >75 ng/dL) are all women. (To convert to pmol/L, multiply by 27.74.)

Classified by age, the premenopausal women (<35 years old) had a very low frequency of NM (7%), which rose steadily with advancing age, reaching 38% among those at perimenopause (45 to 55 years old) and 47% in those older than 55 (Fig 4Down). The contribution of age to NM frequency was highly significant among the women, whether examined by logistic regression (P=.007) or by correlation analysis (r=.98, F=74.5, P=.001). Age also contributed to NM frequency in men, but, as is evident from Fig 3Up, its effect was modest, reaching borderline significance in logistic regression (P=.04) but not in correlation analysis (r=.76, F=2.74, P=NS). Differences in aldosterone responsiveness between men and women were most marked in those women younger than 45 years and then diminished with age, disappearing altogether in subjects older than 55 (Fig 5Down). Sex rendered a more substantial effect than did age upon adrenal responsiveness, when the frequency of NM was examined by logistic regression or aldosterone responsiveness by correlation analysis.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of age on NM frequency. NM frequency increased steadily among women with advancing age, from a low of 7% to a high of 47% (P=.001). The effect of age in men was modest (P=.04).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Plasma aldosterone responses to Ang II infusion in women (black lines) and men (shaded lines) divided into four age cohorts. The striking sex difference, present in the youngest subjects, gradually disappeared with age. Men and women older than 55 years had essentially identical responsiveness.

Of the six women taking estrogen-containing compounds, three were among the highest responders, with aldosterone responses of 2691, 4078, and 4494 pmol/L (97, 147, and 162 ng/dL). The one NM was 60 years old.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study of 225 subjects demonstrated a striking sex difference in the frequency of a common intermediate phenotype of hypertension, NM. Forty-nine percent of men but only 26% of women were affected. The analysis emerged as an examination of the interaction between sex and the genetics and physiology of hypertension, with hypotheses from recent reports that showed the effect of AGT genotype to be evident phenotypically only among males.

The sex difference in NM frequency could not be attributed to dissimilarities in age, BP, body mass index, or sodium balance. In addition to Ang II, potassium is an important stimulus for aldosterone secretion. Serum potassium concentration did not differ between men and women. There was a difference in urinary potassium excretion, but it was opposite that necessary to explain the results. Urinary potassium was lower among the women, despite equal prescribed intake for 5 to 7 days before the study. Nor does the answer lie in higher female levels of corticotropin; plasma cortisol concentration was consistently higher among the men. Studies in normotensive individuals have shown higher rates of urinary cortisol excretion in men than women and higher male cortisol responses to psychological stress8 9 ; corticotropin secretion was greater in males than females in a small group of healthy subjects.10 These results raise intriguing possibilities about a sexually dimorphic influence of stress on cortisol production and perhaps on cardiovascular reactivity more generally.

Sexual dimorphisms of hypertension are abundant in animal models.1 11 In humans, a strong sex difference underlies at least one cause of secondary hypertension, renal artery stenosis, in which fibromuscular dysplasia affects predominantly women.12 Cushing's disease also affects women disproportionately.13 The epidemiological literature is vast, containing multiple studies that unequivocally demonstrate a striking influence of sex on BP.14 Among young and middle-aged cohorts, women have lower systolic and diastolic BPs than men. A lower prevalence of hypertension is accompanied by a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.14 However, the protection conferred on women is not lifelong, dissipating rapidly after the age of 50. Some researchers have attributed the increase in high BP to age, and others have related it directly to menopause.15 16

Age was a contributing factor in the expression of the NM phenotype, which was more frequent as both sexes grew older. In addition to the well-accepted decrease in renin with age, aldosterone secretion is also diminished, with basal levels lowered by as much as 45%.17 Blunted responses in aldosterone release to sodium depletion, upright posture, and Ang II have been reported in small groups of elderly individuals, although these effects were documented in subjects much older (generally >65 years) than those observed in the present study.18 19

The steady increase in NM frequency with advancing age was much more apparent and more significant among women, suggesting that sex derives its influence from female sex hormones, which decline with age. Candidates include progesterone, estrogens, or their relative concentrations. In menstruating women, for example, estradiol concentrations are as low as 180 pmol/L (50 pg/mL) during the follicular stage but reach 735 to 1450 pmol/L (200 to 400 pg/mL) at ovulation; however, they are never as low as in the postmenopausal period, when they hover at a nadir of 37 pmol/L (10 pg/mL). The demonstrated fall in aldosterone responsiveness coincides with the known physiology of peri-menopause. A significant increase in gonadotropins is seen from about 5 years before the actual cessation of menses,20 21 which occurs at an average age of 50 to 51 years in the United States, followed soon thereafter by a fall in circulating estrogen. Plasma progesterone concentration falls to about one third of premenopausal values. Although androgens also fall, particularly dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and testosterone to a lesser extent, the data on NM in aging men argue against a strong role for male sex steroids in protection against the NM phenotype.

Before the era of low-dose oral contraceptives, exogenous estrogen was associated with hypertension in 5% to 15% of users, imparting a relative risk of 2 to 2.5 for oral contraceptive users versus nonusers.22 Similar large doses of estrogens in oral contraceptives reduced renal blood flow by 25% in healthy women.23 These pharmacological doses, which cause huge increases in AGT, PRA, and Ang II, act very differently from physiological doses. The association with hypertension is no longer clear with the newer preparations of oral contraceptives, for example, and a definite beneficial effect of estrogen on cardiovascular risk has emerged.24

The sodium-lithium countertransport genotype is a much stronger predictor of hypertension in men than women.25 Furthermore, mean countertransport activity is significantly higher in NM compared with either normally modulating hypertensive or normotensive subjects.26 Sex, therefore, seems to play a similar role in governing the expression of each feature: Women show much less NM than do men, and women show less of an effect of countertransport genotype on BP. This similarity suggests that in fact these two phenotypes may reflect the same underlying phenomenon.

Data from our study and others provide clues to the mechanisms underlying the relation between sex and NM. The fact that older women express the same frequency as older men makes an X-linked genetic contribution extremely unlikely. The earlier documentation of sexually dimorphic effects of AGT gene polymorphisms on the expression of one index of NM—the renal vascular response to Ang II3 —probably provides a more compelling approach to the mechanism. The results of the present study can be interpreted as an extension of the observation from renal hemodynamics to adrenal aldosterone release, although we do not yet have information on genotype in this cohort.

Estrogen is one of the main stimulants of hepatic AGT production. However, the interactions among estrogen, AGT, and NM may be entirely unrelated to circulating levels of AGT. No differences in circulating PRA or Ang II, either basal or stimulated, emerged in this study. We have proposed defects in the tissue renin-angiotensin system, defects that are undetectable in serum concentrations of any measurable hormones, to explain the NM phenotype.27 Regulation of the AGT gene by estrogens occurs at the transcriptional level, where the role of estrogen in modifying gene expression may be complex. Although estrogen is known to stimulate gene transcription, NM may be accompanied by a defect in the regulatory region, which could modify the way estrogen controls AGT expression. Conversely, the actions of estrogen on its response elements in the 5' flanking region may be differentially regulated by molecular variants of AGT.

In addition, estrogen may render effects at the receptor level. Although this mechanistic explanation is speculative, chronic estrogen treatment is known to modify Ang II receptor density in the adrenal cortex and pituitary.28 29 Furthermore, sex differences in the renin-angiotensin system are not isolated to AGT; higher prorenin concentrations have been noted in men, for example.30 In a recent study of elements of the renin-angiotensin system in postmenopausal women, higher plasma renin and prorenin as well as lower AGT concentrations characterized those women without estrogen replacement.31 Animal studies suggest that estradiol may be involved in lowering Ang II–induced hypertension in females through its effects on the central nervous system.32

Finally, the beneficial effects of estrogen may be at least partly unrelated to the renin-angiotensin system. Direct vasodilation has been shown in animal and human models.33 34 A lower total peripheral resistance has been reported in hypertensive women than men and is manifest only during the premenopausal years.35 Related mechanisms may include release of nitric oxide (a vasodilator), shown to be significantly higher during peak estrogen phases of the menstrual cycle, and endothelin (a vasoconstrictor), shown to be higher in men than women.36 37

NM can now be designated as an example of sexual dimorphism affecting a very common intermediate phenotype of human hypertension. Furthermore, on the basis of hypertension frequencies reported in recent epidemiological data,38 two thirds of the protection against hypertension conferred on young white women can be statistically accounted for by the NM phenotype. Amidst the highly complex interplay of factors that determine tissue responses to Ang II, it appears that female sex hormones play a leading role. We speculate that they enable an "override of genotype," amounting to phenotypic protection in women. We suggest that although genotype reveals itself in men, female sex hormones, either directly or indirectly, lessen the effect of a genetic predisposition in women.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
AGT = angiotensinogen
Ang I, II = angiotensin I, II
BP = blood pressure
CI = confidence interval
NM = non-modulation, non-modulator(s)
PRA = plasma renin activity


*    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported in part by a National Institutes of Health grant (MO1RR02635) to the Brigham and Women's Hospital General Clinical Research Center. Personal research of Dr Fisher was supported by the related Clinical Associate Physician award (MO1RR02635-10S1).

Received August 9, 1996; first decision September 24, 1996; accepted October 18, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Chen YF. Sexual dimorphism of hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1996;6:181-185.

2. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev Y, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM, Corvol P. Molecular basis of human hypertension: role of angiotensinogen. Cell. 1992;71:169-178. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Hopkins PN, Lifton RP, Hollenberg NK, Jeunemaitre X, Hallouin MC, Skuppin J, Williams CS, Dluhy RG, Lalouel JM, Williams RR, Williams GH. Blunted renal vascular response to angiotensin II is associated with a common variant of the angiotensinogen gene and obesity. J Hypertens. 1996;14:199-207. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Bradshaw B, Moore TJ. Abnormal regulation of adrenal angiotensin II receptors in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1988;11:49-54. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Emanuel R, Cain JP, Williams GH. Double antibody radioimmunoassay of renin activity and angiotensin II in human peripheral plasma. J Lab Clin Med. 1973;81:632-640. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Williams GH, Hollenberg NK. Are non-modulating patients with essential hypertension a distinct subgroup? Am J Med. 1985;79(suppl 3C):3-9.

7. Williams GH, Dluhy RG, Lifton RP, Moore TJ, Gleason R, Williams R, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Hollenberg NK. Non-modulation as an intermediate phenotype in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:788-796. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Lamb EJ, Noona KA, Burrin JM. Urine-free cortisol excretion: evidence of sex-dependence. Ann Clin Biochem. 1994;31(part 5):455-458.

9. Kirschbaum C, Wust S, Hellhammer D. Consistent sex differences in cortisol responses to psychological stress. Psychosom Med. 1992;54:648-657. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Roelfsema F, van den Berg G, Frolich M, Veldhuis JD, van Eijk A, Buurman MM, Etman BH. Sex-dependent alteration in cortisol response to endogenous adrenocorticotropin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:234-240. [Abstract]

11. Chen YF, Naftilan AJ, Oparil S. Androgen-dependent angiotensinogen and messenger RNA expression in hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1992;19:456-463. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Novick AC. Surgical revascularization for renovascular hypertension and preservation of renal function. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1995;2:2056.

13. Yen SSC, Jaffe RB. Reproductive Endocrinology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1991:609-610.

14. Cohen E, Wheat ME, Swiderski DM, Charney P. Hypertension in women. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishers; 1995;1:159-169.

15. Staessen J, Bulpitt CJ, Fagard R, Lijnen P, Amery A. The influence of menopause on blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens. 1989;3:427-433. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Casiglia E, d'Este D, Ginocchio G, Colangeli G, Onesto C, Tramontin P, Ambrosio G, Pessina A. Lack of influence of menopause on blood pressure and cardiovascular risk profile: a 16-year longitudinal study concerning a cohort of 568 women. J Hypertens. 1996;14:729-736. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Flood C, Gherondache C, Pincus G, Tait JF, Tait SAS, Willoughby S. The metabolism and secretion of aldosterone in elderly subjects. J Clin Invest. 1967;46:960-966.

18. Weidmann P, De Myttenaere-Bursztein S, Maxwell MH, De Lima J. Effect of aging on plasma renin and aldosterone in normal man. Kidney Int. 1975;8:325-333. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Takeda R, Morimoto S, Uchida K, Miyamori I, Hashiba T. Effect of age on plasma aldosterone response to exogenous angiotensin II in normotensive subjects. Acta Endocrinol. 1980;94:552-558.

20. Rannevik G, Jeppsson S, Johnell O, Bjerre B, Laurell-Borulf Y, Svanberg L. A longitudinal study of the perimenopausal transition: altered profiles of steroid and pituitary hormones, SHBG and bone mineral density. Maturitas. 1995;21:103-113. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Trevoux R, DeBrux J, Castanier M, Nahoul K, Soule JP, Scholler R. Endometrium and plasma hormone profile in the peri-menopause and post-menopause. Maturitas. 1986;8:309-326. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Jaffe LS, Seely EW. The heterogeneity of the blood pressure response to hormonal contraceptives. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabet. 1995;2:257-265.

23. Hollenberg NK, Williams GH, Burger B, Chenitz W, Hoosmand I, Adams DF. Renal blood flow and its response to angiotensin II: an interaction between oral contraceptive agents, sodium intake, and the renin-angiotensin system in healthy young women. Circ Res. 1976;38:35-40. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH. Postmenopausal estrogen therapy and cardiovascular disease: ten-year follow-up from the Nurses' Health Study. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:756-762. [Abstract]

25. Rebbeck TR, Turner ST, Sing CF. Sodium-lithium countertransport genotype and the probability of hypertension in adults. Hypertension. 1993;22:560-568. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Redgrave J, Canessa M, Gleason R, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Red blood cell lithium-sodium countertransport in non-modulating essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1989;13:721-726. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Redgrave J, Rabinowe S, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH. Correction of abnormal renal blood flow response to angiotensin II by converting enzyme inhibition in essential hypertensives. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1285-1290.

28. Bachmann J, Feldmer M, Ganten U, Stock G, Ganten D. Sexual dimorphism of blood pressure: possible role of the renin-angiotensin system. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1991;40:511-515. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Carriere PD, De Lean A, Gutkowska J, Genest J, Cantin M. Chronic estradiol treatment decreases angiotensin II receptor density in the anterior pituitary gland and adrenal cortex but not in the mesenteric artery. Neuroendocrinology. 1986;43:49-56. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Sealey JE, Atlas SA, Laragh JH. Prorenin and other large molecular weight forms of renin. Endocr Rev. 1980;1:365-391. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Schunkert H, Danser J, Hense HW, Derkx FHM, Kurzinger S, Riegger GAJ. Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on the renin angiotensin system in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1997;95:39-45. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Ciriello J, Rosas-Arellano MP, Flores LP. Circulating oestrogen alters the response of neurons in circumventricular organs to angiotensin II in the female. J Hypertens. 1996;14:S139. Abstract.

33. Sudhir K, Chou TM, Mullen WL, Hausmann D, Collins P, Yock PG, Chatterjee K. Mechanisms of estrogen-induced vasodilation: in vivo studies in canine coronary conductance and resistance arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:807-814. [Abstract]

34. Gilligan DM, Badar DM, Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO III. Acute vascular effects of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Circulation. 1994;90:786-791. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Messerli FH, Garavaglia GE, Schmieder RE, Sundgaard-Riise K, Nunez BD, Amodeo C. Disparate cardiovascular findings in men and women with essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:158-161.

36. Kharitonov SA, Logan-Sinclair RB, Busset CM, Shinebourne EA. Peak expiratory nitric oxide differences in men and women: relation to the menstrual cycle. Br Heart J. 1994;72:243-245. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Polderman KH, Stehouwer CD, van Kamp GJ, Dekker GA, Verheugt FW, Gooren LJ. Influence of sex hormones on plasma endothelin levels. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:429-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Brown C, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population: results from the Third NHANES, 1988-1991. Hypertension. 1995;25:303-313.[Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. P. Hutchens, J. Dunlap, P. D. Hurn, and P. O. Jarnberg
Renal Ischemia: Does Sex Matter?
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2008; 107(1): 239 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. J. O'Donnell, S. Demissie, M. Kimura, D. Levy, J. P. Gardner, C. White, R. B. D'Agostino, P. A. Wolf, J. Polak, L. A. Cupples, et al.
Leukocyte Telomere Length and Carotid Artery Intimal Medial Thickness: The Framingham Heart Study
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2008; 28(6): 1165 - 1171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. Kosachunhanun, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, R. R. Williams, X. Jeunemaitre, P. Corvol, C. Ferri, R. M. Mortensen, N. K. Hollenberg, and G. H. Williams
Genetic Determinants of Nonmodulating Hypertension
Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 901 - 908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. H. Le, H.-S. Kim, A. M. Allen, R. F. Spurney, O. Smithies, and T. M. Coffman
Physiological Impact of Increased Expression of the AT1 Angiotensin Receptor
Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 507 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. D.L. Fisher, S. Hurwitz, X. Jeunemaitre, P. N. Hopkins, N. K. Hollenberg, and G. H. Williams
Familial Aggregation of Low-Renin Hypertension
Hypertension, April 1, 2002; 39(4): 914 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
K. F. Hilgers, C. Delles, R. Veelken, and R. E. Schmieder
Angiotensinogen Gene Core Promoter Variants and Non-Modulating Hypertension
Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1250 - 1254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. D.L. Fisher, S. Hurwitz, X. Jeunemaitre, D. A. Price, G. H. Williams, and N. K. Hollenberg
Adrenal Response to Angiotensin II in Black Hypertension: Lack of Sexual Dimorphism
Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Aviv
Hypothesis : Pulse Pressure and Human Longevity
Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1060 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Benetos, K. Okuda, M. Lajemi, M. Kimura, F. Thomas, J. Skurnick, C. Labat, K. Bean, and A. Aviv
Telomere Length as an Indicator of Biological Aging : The Gender Effect and Relation With Pulse Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity
Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 381 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Giacche, A. Vuagnat, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, N. D. L. Fisher, M. Azizi, P. Corvol, G. H. Williams, and X. Jeunemaitre
Aldosterone Stimulation by Angiotensin II : Influence of Gender, Plasma Renin, and Familial Resemblance
Hypertension, March 1, 2000; 35(3): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Ylitalo, K. E. J. Airaksinen, A. Hautanen, M. Kupari, M. Carson, J. Virolainen, M. Savolainen, H. Kauma, Y. A. Kesaniemi, P. C. White, et al.
Baroreflex sensitivity and variants of the renin angiotensin system genes
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 194 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. P. Audoly, S. L. Tilley, J. Goulet, M. Key, M. Nguyen, J. L. Stock, J. D. McNeish, B. H. Koller, and T. M. Coffman
Identification of specific EP receptors responsible for the hemodynamic effects of PGE2
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 1999; 277(3): H924 - H930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. D. L. Fisher, S. Hurwitz, C. Ferri, X. Jeunemaitre, N. K. Hollenberg, and G. H. Williams
Altered Adrenal Sensitivity to Angiotensin II in Low-Renin Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 388 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Horiguchi, M. Kimura, J. Skurnick, and A. Aviv
Parameters of Lymphocyte Na+-Ca2+ Regulation and Blood Pressure : The Gender Effect
Hypertension, November 1, 1998; 32(5): 869 - 874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
T. Rankinen, T. Rice, A. S. Leon, J. S. Skinner, J. H. Wilmore, D. C. Rao, and C. Bouchard
G protein {beta}3 polymorphism and hemodynamic and body composition phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, February 28, 2002; 8(2): 151 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Hopkins, S. C. Hunt, X. Jeunemaitre, B. Smith, D. Solorio, N. D.L. Fisher, N. K. Hollenberg, and G. H. Williams
Angiotensinogen Genotype Affects Renal and Adrenal Responses to Angiotensin II in Essential Hypertension
Circulation, April 23, 2002; 105(16): 1921 - 1927.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seely, E. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, N. D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Seely, E. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*High Blood Pressure