(Hypertension. 1997;29:1199-1203.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Hypertension, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Correspondence to Daniel Hayoz, Division of Hypertension, CHUV, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. E-mail daniel.hayoz{at}chuv.hospvd.ch
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: hypertrophy hypertension, renovascular ultrasonography
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both clipped and sham-operated rats were divided into four
groups. The first group of 12 hypertensive and 8 control rats was
examined 1 week after the surgical procedure; the second group of 10
rats each, after 5 weeks; the third group of 8 hypertensive rats and 11
controls, after 9 weeks; and the fourth group of 10 hypertensive rats
and 10 controls, after 24 weeks. On the day of the experiment,
anesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane at a
concentration of 1.5%. The right common carotid artery was cannulated
with a catheter (PE-50, Portex) filled with a heparinized 0.9% NaCl
solution. Intra-arterial pressure and heart rate were
monitored with a computerized data-acquisition system as described
previously.14 The internal diameter of the left common
carotid artery was measured at the same time with an A-mode ultrasonic
echotracking device (Diarad, Asulab) that has already been used in
humans and animals.6 15 16 17 Briefly, the
apparatus consists of an A-mode ultrasonic echotracking
device that measures the variations in diameter of the common carotid
artery with a precision close to 1 µm. The high resolution
reached with this device is made possible by oversampling (5000
arterial diameter measurements per second) and averaging 16
consecutive values. A 10-MHz transducer is placed perpendicularly to
the arterial axis with Doppler mode, and an ultrasonic
gel is used for signal transduction. Arterial wall
movements that produce echoes of larger amplitude than those of
surrounding tissues are visualized on a screen and tagged by electronic
tracers. Ten successive diameter-pressure recordings were made
for each rat in a given 5-minute period and then averaged for
analysis. The simultaneous arterial
diameter and BP measurements were processed on-line to calculate a
diameter-pressure relationship, which is subsequently converted into an
arterial cross-sectional compliance-pressure curve
characterized over the whole range of operating BPs. This curve fits
best with an arctangent function described by Langewouters et
al.18 Cross-sectional compliance (C) in the case of a
cylindrical vessel is given by
S/
P, where
S is the change in
cross section, and
P is the change in BP. Arterial
cross-sectional distensibility (D) is the inverse of the Peterson
elastic modulus,19 ie, the compliance value normalized for
the cross section (S). It is defined as D=(1/S)x(
S/
P).
At the end of the measurements, the rats were euthanized with a lethal dose (90 mg/kg IV) of pentobarbital (CHUV). The heart was immediately excised, squeezed, and weighed.
The common carotid artery was pressurized and fixed at 100 mm Hg
during 30 minutes with intra-arterial infusion of a 4%
paraformaldehyde solution. The left common carotid
artery was then excised and cannulated with an adapted polyethylene
catheter to preserve a circular shape during processing for
histological examination. Paraffin-embedded tissue
blocks were sectioned at a thickness of 5 µm and stained by
hematoxylin-eosin. Histometric measurements were performed with a
microscope (Diaphot, Nikon). The intima-media thickness (IMT) and
internal diameter measurements were carried out with a 200-fold
magnification in a blinded fashion. The measurements from two carotid
sections and six fields per section were averaged. The intima-media
cross-sectional area (CSA) of the fixed arteries was determined
according to the formula CSA=
[(Internal
Radius+IMT)2-(Internal Radius)2]. The
media-to-lumen ratio was calculated according to the formula
Media-to-Lumen Ratio=IMT·100/Internal Radius.
For estimation of Einc and mean circumferential stress, arterial wall thickness was derived for each level of BP from the cross-sectional area measured at histology and from the internal diameter (d) measured in vivo. As the arteries are pressurized during fixation, longitudinal retraction is prevented. It is further assumed that the cross-sectional area remains constant in vivo and in vitro and thus is not influenced by changes in diameter because of the incompressibility of the wall material.11 20 However, because of dehydration of the fixed tissue, the calculated thickness underestimates in all groups the real value of the nonfixed artery (personal observations, unpublished data, 1996). Calculation with this value leads to an overestimation of Einc and mean circumferential stress. However, it could be assumed that the overestimation is present to the same degree in all arteries; thus, these parameters were compared among the groups.
Wall thickness (h) was calculated according to the formula
h=
{[CSA+
(d/2)2]/
}-d/2. Circumferential
stress (
) at each level of operational BP (p) and internal diameter
(d) was derived from the formula
=pd/2·h. Finally,
Einc was defined as
Einc=
/
Strain=
(n+1)-
n/[d(n+1)-dn]
and was calculated for each increase in intra-arterial BP
of 2.5 mm Hg within the operational BP range.
Statistical Analysis
Between-group comparisons of body weight, heart weight index
(heart weight [milligrams] divided by body weight [grams]),
diameter, distensibility, Einc and mean circumferential
stress of the carotid artery at mean BP, internal diameter at
histology, cross-sectional area, intima-media thickness, media-to-lumen
ratio, and BP were made by the Bonferroni/Donn test adapted for
multiple comparisons. The diameter-pressure and distensibility-pressure
curves were established within operating pressures, the upper and lower
limits representing the mean systolic and
diastolic values for the group, respectively. For
statistical evaluation of the Einc-stress curves, the areas
under the curves of the overlapping stress ranges were compared with
Scheffé's S test. Results are given as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
At histological examination, the intima-media thickness
and media-to-lumen ratio of the carotid artery were increased in all
hypertensive compared with sham-operated rats (Table 2
).
Intima-media cross-sectional area was also significantly increased in
the hypertensive rats, and the percent rises compared with age-matched
controls were 39%, 51%, 65%, and 90% at 1, 5, 9, and 24 weeks
after clipping, respectively.
|
Since the operating BPs did not overlap in hypertensive and
sham-operated rats, the mechanical properties of the carotid artery
could not be compared in the range of their respective operating BPs
(Figure
). However, at least at 1, 9, and 24 weeks after
clipping, the distensibility-pressure curves of the hypertensive rats
did not appear to be shifted toward lower levels compared with curves
in the controls. Five weeks after clipping, the curve appeared to be
shifted to higher levels. When distensibility and internal diameter
were analyzed at mean operating BP, arterial
distensibility was significantly decreased (P<.05) and the
internal diameter increased (P<.05) in all hypertensive
rats compared with their respective controls (Table 3
).
Wall stress at mean BP was not different between normotensive and
hypertensive rats. However, Einc was increased in the
hypertensive rats at all ages compared with controls at mean BP levels.
When Einc was plotted against wall stress, in the 1- and
5-week hypertensive rats, the curves did not differ from those of the
controls (Fig 1
). However, 9 weeks after clipping, the curves were
significantly steeper, revealing stiffening of the intima-media
material. The difference between the Einc-stress curves was
even more pronounced in the 24-week rats.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One week after clipping of the renal artery, vascular hypertrophy of the carotid has already occurred, without reduction of its isobaric distensibility. On the contrary, the distensibility-pressure curve is shifted slightly upward compared with that of control rats. This clearly demonstrates that the arterial distensibility reflects the combined effect of geometric parameters such as diameter and wall thickness and intrinsic wall properties defined by Einc. Only the determination of the latter parameter is indicative of the alterations of the wall constituents. Since the intraluminal pressure is perceived by the wall material as a pressure-induced stress, Einc is best determined for a given circumferential wall stress.25 The Einc plotted against wall stress after 1 week is not different between the two groups of rats.
At 5 weeks, with a further increase in BP and vascular hypertrophy, the distensibility-pressure curve shows a more pronounced trend toward higher levels than at 1 week. Although isodistensibility is not achieved at 5 weeks for operating BPs in the hypertensive rats, our results demonstrate that besides an increase in wall tissue mass, additional adaptive transformations result in a decreased stiffness of the arterial wall expressed by the Einc at isobaric conditions (data not shown). At week 5, again the Einc plotted against wall stress shows similar values for a given level of stress for the two populations.
The adaptive process observed in the early phase of this study deserves two comments. First, the extremely rapid increase in cardiac and vascular mass may result from the synergistic effects of the activated renin-angiotensin system and its accompanying high BP and the growth conditions of these young rats. Up to 5 weeks, the adaptation shows an autoregulation, with thickening of the vessel wall and reduced stiffness of the material at isobaric conditions. These results confirm our previous observations in the 2K1C Goldblatt rat model and provide new information on the intrinsic properties of the vascular wall while adapting to an increased BP. These results are also very similar to those observed in the radial arteries in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients who exhibit vascular hypertrophy, preservation of isobaric arterial distensibility, and similar Einc values at equivalent stress levels compared with control subjects.26
In contrast to the early adaptive phase, 9 and 24 weeks after clipping, the arterial wall shows a different evolution. Indeed, Einc plotted against wall stress shows a significantly increased stiffness of the carotid in the hypertensive compared with the control rats even though the distensibility-pressure curve was not shifted to lower levels. Thickening of the vessel wall without changes in internal diameter, ie, eccentric hypertrophy,26 at weeks 9 and 24 explains the different Einc-stress curves between the two rat groups while the distensibility-pressure curves remain similar. Thus, it appears that with a longer duration of hypertension, the constituents involved in the thickening of the artery become significantly more rigid than those of the carotid artery of control rats for equivalent wall stress levels as a result of either quantitative or qualitative modification of the individual wall components. These results clearly emphasize the need to characterize arterial biomechanics with indexes discriminating those dependent in part on geometric changes (compliance and distensibility) from those relative to intrinsic elastic property changes (elastic modulus). If determination of arterial compliance allows one to estimate the buffering capacity of the artery, it does not provide any qualitative information on the wall material at risk of undergoing atherosclerotic transformations, as shown here between weeks 1 and 24. The second phase of adaptation seen here at 9 and 24 weeks is reminiscent of the aging process observed in human large conduit vessels. In contrast to the preserved or increased arterial distensibility accompanying vascular hypertrophy of newly diagnosed hypertensive patients, aging is characterized by hypertrophic vessels with decreased distensibility.27 Thus, at 9 and 24 weeks, a combination of the hypertension-induced alterations and aging or accelerated fatigue may be responsible for the increased rigidity of the wall material at equivalent wall stress but without a decline in the distensibility-pressure curve. The strong correlation between the degree of hypertrophy and BP indicates once again that the increase in BP per se may be a potent stimulus for the development of the hypertrophy. Since plasma renin activity was not measured, the contribution of an activated renin-angiotensin system on vascular hypertrophy could not be evaluated. However, on the basis of previous studies, plasma renin activity rises in the 2K1C rat for more than 12 weeks after clipping.28 29 Thus, it can be assumed that at 9 weeks, plasma angiotensin levels were still increased and may have contributed to the progression of vascular hypertrophy. However, in the long run, despite protective adaptations, accelerated alterations of the wall material caused by high BP and aging lead inevitably to stiffening of the arterial wall. Reversibility of the morphological changes in this second phase may become more hypothetical.
In conclusion, the 2K1C Goldblatt rat model of renal hypertension develops a very severe form of hypertension, with early cardiac and vascular hypertrophy. Parallel to the hypertrophic process, the intrinsic properties of the arterial wall remain normal up to 5 weeks after clipping but become clearly stiffer after 9 weeks for similar levels of wall stress. Nevertheless, these results demonstrate that the carotid arterial wall can adapt to increased intra-arterial pressure by normalizing wall stress and maintaining a relatively normal distensibility-pressure curve. Further studies analyzing the effect of the initiation of blood pressurelowering therapy at different stages of wall adaptation may provide useful information on the reversibility of morphological and functional alterations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 5, 1996; first decision September 3, 1996; accepted November 18, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Folkow B. Physiological
aspects of primary hypertension. Physiol Rev. 1982;62:347-504.
3.
Devereux RB, Roman MJ, Ganau A, de Simone G, Okin PM,
Kligfield P. Cardiac and arterial
hypertrophy and atherosclerosis in
hypertension. Hypertension. 1994;23:802-809.
4.
O'Rourke M. Arterial stiffness,
systolic blood pressure, and logical treatment of
hypertension. Hypertension. 1990;15:339-347.
5. Delacrétaz E, Hayoz D, Osterheld MC, Genton CY, Brunner HR, Waeber B. Long-term nitric oxide inhibition and distensibility of carotid artery in intact rats. Hypertension. 1994;23(part 2):967-970.
6. Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Genton CY, Niederberger M, Brunner HR, Waeber B. Elastic behaviour of the carotid artery in intact spontaneously hypertensive rats. Eur Heart J. 1993;14(suppl C):10-13.
7.
Baumbach GL, Dobrin PB, Hart MN, Heistad DD.
Mechanics of cerebral arterioles in hypertensive rats.
Circ Res. 1988;62:56-64.
8.
Hajdu MA, Heistad DD, Baumbach GL. Effects of
antihypertensive therapy on mechanics of cerebral arterioles in
rats. Hypertension. 1991;17:308-316.
9.
Baumbach GL, Hajdu MA. Mechanics and
composition of cerebral arterioles in renal and spontaneously
hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1993;21:816-826.
10.
Delacrétaz E, Zanchi A, Nussberger J, Hayoz D,
Aubert JF, Brunner HR, Waeber B. Chronic nitric oxide synthase
inhibition and carotid artery distensibility in renal hypertensive
rats. Hypertension. 1995;26:332-336.
11. Tardy Y, Meister JJ, Perret F, Brunner HR, Arditi M. Non-invasive estimate of the mechanical properties of peripheral arteries from ultrasonic and photoplethysmographic measurements. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1991;12:39-54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Hayoz D, Tardy Y, Perret F, Waeber B, Meister JJ, Brunner HR. Non-invasive determination of arterial diameter and distensibility by echo-tracking techniques in hypertension. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 5):S95-S100.
13. Perret F, Mooser V, Hayoz D, Tardy Y, Meister JJ, Etienne JD, Farine PA, Marazzi A, Burnier M, Nussberger J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Evaluation of arterial compliance-pressure curves: effect of antihypertensive drugs. Hypertension. 1991;18(suppl II):II-77-II-83.
14. Flückiger JP, Gremaud G, Waeber B, Kulik A, Ichino A, Nussberger J, Brunner HR. Measurement of sympathetic nerve activity in the unanesthetized rat. J Appl Physiol. 1989;167:250-255.
15.
Hayoz D, Rutschmann B, Perret F, Niederberger M, Tardy
Y, Mooser V, Nussberger J, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Conduit artery
compliance and distensibility are not necessarily reduced in
hypertension. Hypertension. 1992;20:1-6.
16. Tardy Y, Hayoz D, Mignot JP, Brunner HR, Meister JJ. Noninvasive measurement of arterial diameter and wall thickness with ultrasound. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):105-109.
17. Laurent S, Hayoz D, Trazzi S, Boutouyrie P, Waeber B, Omboni S, Brunner HR, Mancia G, Safar M. Isobaric compliance of the radial artery is increased in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11:89-98.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Godehard WJA. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. J Biomech. 1984;17:425-435.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Peterson LH, Jensen RE, Parnell J. Mechanical
properties of arteries in vivo. Circ Res. 1960;8:622-639.
20. Girerd XJ, Acar C, Mourad JJ, Boutouyrie P, Safar ME, Laurent S. Incompressibility of the human arterial wall: an in vitro ultrasound study. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):S111-S114.
21.
Martinez-Maldonado M. Pathophysiology of
renovascular hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;17:707-719.
22. Zemplenyi T, Crawford DW, Cole MA. Adaptation to arterial wall hypoxia demonstrated in vivo with oxygen microcathodes. Atherosclerosis. 1989;76:173-179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Crawford DW, Blankenhorn DH. Arterial wall oxygenation, oxyradicals, and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1991;89:97-108.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Levy BI, Michel JB, Salzmann JL, Azizi M, Poitevin P,
Safar ME, Camilleri JP. Effects of chronic inhibition of
converting enzyme on mechanical and structural properties of arteries
in rat renovascular hypertension. Circ Res. 1988;63:227-239.
25. Dobrin PB. Vascular mechanics. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 2:The Cardiovascular System, Volume III, Peripheral Circulation and Organ Blood Flow. Baltimore, Md: American Physiological Society; 1983:65-102.
26. Weber R, Stergiolpulos N, Brunner HR, Hayoz D. Contributions of vascular tone and structure to elastic properties of a medium size artery. Hypertension. 1996;27(part 2):816-822.
27. Boutouyrie P, Laurent S, Benetos A, Girerd XJ, Hoeks APG, Safar ME. Opposing effects of ageing on distal and proximal large arteries in hypertensives. J Hypertens. 1992;10(suppl 6):S87-S91.
28. Leenen FHH, De Jong W, De Wied D. Renal venous and peripheral plasma renin activity in renal hypertension in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1973;225:1513-1518.
29. Morton JJ, Wallace ECH. The importance of the renin-angiotensin system in the development and maintenance of hypertension in the two-kidney, one-clip hypertensive rat. Clin Sci. 1983;64:359-370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. E. Wagenseil, R. H. Knutsen, D. Y. Li, and R. P. Mecham Elastin-insufficient mice show normal cardiovascular remodeling in 2K1C hypertension despite higher baseline pressure and unique cardiovascular architecture Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H574 - H582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan and E. L. Schiffrin Structure and Mechanical Properties of Resistance Arteries in Hypertension : Role of Adhesion Molecules and Extracellular Matrix Determinants Hypertension, September 1, 2000; 36(3): 312 - 318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bussy, P. Boutouyrie, P. Lacolley, P. Challande, and S. Laurent Intrinsic Stiffness of the Carotid Arterial Wall Material in Essential Hypertensives Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35(5): 1049 - 1054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Jeong Bae Park, H. D Intengan, and E. L Schiffrin Reduction of resistance artery stiffness by treatment with the AT1-receptor antagonist losartan in essential hypertension Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2000; 1(1): 40 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan, G. Thibault, J.-S. Li, and E. L. Schiffrin Resistance Artery Mechanics, Structure, and Extracellular Components in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats : Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Antagonism and Converting Enzyme Inhibition Circulation, November 30, 1999; 100(22): 2267 - 2275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Marque, P. Kieffer, J. Atkinson, and I. Lartaud-Idjouadiene Elastic Properties and Composition of the Aortic Wall in Old Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 415 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-A. Haefliger, P. Meda, A. Formenton, P. Wiesel, A. Zanchi, H. R. Brunner, P. Nicod, and D. Hayoz Aortic Connexin43 Is Decreased During Hypertension Induced by Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthase Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 1999; 19(7): 1615 - 1622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Laurant, D. Hayoz, H. R. Brunner, and A. Berthelot Effect of Magnesium Deficiency on Blood Pressure and Mechanical Properties of Rat Carotid Artery Hypertension, May 1, 1999; 33(5): 1105 - 1110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Bezie, P. Lacolley, S. Laurent, and G. Gabella Connection of Smooth Muscle Cells to Elastic Lamellae in Aorta of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, July 1, 1998; 32(1): 166 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zanchi, N. Stergiopulos, H. R. Brunner, and D. Hayoz Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Rat Carotid Artery In Vivo, In Situ, and In Vitro Hypertension, July 1, 1998; 32(1): 180 - 185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |