(Hypertension. 1997;29:1291-1295.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the University of Ottawa (Ontario, Canada) Heart Institute (B.S.H., F.H.H.L.), and Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Ramon Y Cajia, Madrid, Spain (J.M.S., R.G.-R.).
Correspondence to Frans H.H. Leenen, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Hypertension Unit, H360, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9 Canada. E-mail fleenen{at}ohi-net.heartinst.on.ca
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Na+,K+-exchanging ATPase ouabain hypothalamo-hypophyseal system sympathetic nerve activity immunoglobulins, Fab
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Different from ouabain and ouabainlike compounds, a nonpeptide, nonlipid Na+,K+-ATPase inhibitor with low molecular weight has been isolated and purified from bovine hypothalamic and pituitary tissues.11 12 This compound, named HHIF, inhibits in a dose-related manner Na+,K+-ATPase and displaces ouabain from its receptors at the enzyme structure.11 12 It does not have ouabainlike cross-reactivity11 12 and inhibits the calcium pump of the synaptosome plasma membrane probably via disruption of the lipid annulus.13 So far, it has not been examined whether in vivo HHIF administered centrally may cause sympathoexcitation and hypertension, effects that have been shown for other brain or plasma-borne Na+,K+-ATPase inhibitors.14 15
In the present study, we (1) compared in conscious normotensive rats the changes in MAP, HR, and RSNA in response to acute ICV injection of HHIF, with or without pretreatment with intravenous AVP-ant, and compared these responses with those to ICV ouabain; (2) tested whether these responses can be blocked by ICV antibody Fab fragments, which bind ouabain,10 "ouabain,"10 16 and related steroids17 18 with high affinity; and (3) evaluated in vitro the effects of HHIF and ouabain on Na+,K+-ATPase activity with or without Fab fragments.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After rats had 3 days for adaptation and while they were under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, a 23-gauge guide needle was fixed with acrylic cement on the skull over the left lateral cerebral ventricle as a guide cannula (0.4 mm posterior and 1.4 mm lateral to the bregma). The lower end was 0.5 mm above the ventricle. At least 1 week later, rats were anesthetized with halothane inhalation and catheters were placed in the right femoral artery and vein. With additional intravenous methohexital sodium (30 mg/kg Brevital supplemented with 10 mg/kg as needed, Eli Lilly Canada Inc), a pair of platinum electrodes was placed around the left renal nerve through a left flank incision.15 After rats had recovered from the anesthesia (4 to 5 hours), they were placed in the original cage without restriction of movement. The intra-arterial catheter was connected to a pressure transducer, and BP and HR were recorded with a polygraph (model 7E, Grass Instrument Co) and tachograph (Grass 7P44). The electrodes were connected to a Grass P511 band-pass amplifier, and nerve activity (spikes per second) was counted by a nerve traffic analyzer (model 706C, University of Iowa Bioengineering). The background noise was recorded when the rats were killed at the end of experiments,15 and the actual RSNA was determined by subtracting noise from total activity. For ICV injection, a 26-gauge stainless steel needle was inserted into the guide cannula so that its tip protruded 0.8 to 1.0 mm from the tip of the guide cannula and was located inside the lateral ventricle. A 10-µL volume microsyringe (Hamilton) was used for ICV injection. All the compounds used in the experiments except Fab fragments were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co.
Rats were allowed to rest for 30 minutes after lines were
connected. After the resting BP, HR, and RSNA had been measured,
ouabain (1 µg per 0.5 mL for 10 seconds) and HHIF (25 U per 0.5 mL
for 10 seconds) were injected intravenously at a 10-minute
interval. The rats were thereafter randomly divided into four groups.
In group 1 (n=6), ouabain at 0.3 and 0.6 µg per 1 to 2 µL was
injected ICV. The next dose was given after the responses to the first
injection had subsided for 5 minutes. Rats rested for 1 hour after
disappearance of the responses, and 0.6 µg ouabain ICV was then
repeated 5 minutes after ICV injection of Fab fragments (66 µg per 4
µL, Digibind). In group 2 (n=4), the same injections as in group 1
were repeated, with
-globulins (66 µg per 4 µL) used as a
substitute for Fab fragments. In group 3 (n=4), the same protocol as in
group 1 was adopted, with ICV HHIF (2, 5, 7.5, and 25.0 U dissolved in
1 to 3 µL normal saline) substituted for ICV ouabain. Finally, in
group 4 (n=10), the same injections of HHIF as for group 3 were
performed, except that 5 minutes before each HHIF injection, the
vasopressin V1 receptor antagonist
[ß-mercapto-ß,ß-cyclopentamethylenepropionyl1,O-Me-Tyr2,Arg8]-vasopressin,
termed AVP-ant (Sigma Chemical Co),19 was injected
intravenously to exclude the vasoconstrictor effects of
possibly increased endogenous vasopressin.
HHIF was extracted from bovine hypothalamus and hypophysis. The method of successive chromatography for HHIF purification has been described previously.11 The quantity of HHIF was determined by measurement of its ability to inhibit Na+,K+-ATPase. One unit was defined as the amount of HHIF that inhibits 50% activity of 8 µg (7.2x10-11 mol) 90% purified Na+,K+-ATPase.11 The enzyme was purified from porcine kidney outer medulla.11
The in vitro assay for ouabain and HHIF for estimation of the
inhibitory effect on Na+,K+-ATPase
has been described previously.15 Quantification was done
by measuring 32P liberation from [
-32P]ATP
(New England Nuclear) that was hydrolyzed by ouabain-sensitive
Na+,K+-ATPase prepared from dog kidney (Sigma)
with or without the presence of specific amounts of ouabain, HHIF, and
Fab fragments.
Statistically significant differences between the responses before and
after ICV pretreatment with Fab fragments or
-globulins were
determined by paired t test. ANOVA was used for other
comparisons, followed by Duncan's multiple range test. The level of
significance was set at a value of P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Responses to ICV Ouabain
Intravenous injection of 1 µg ouabain did not affect
baseline BP, HR, or RSNA (data not shown). ICV ouabain at 0.3 and 0.6
µg caused dose-dependent increases in BP, HR, and RSNA (Figs 1
and 2
). The responses started about 1 minute
after ouabain injection, reached their plateau within 5 minutes (Fig 1
), and disappeared 10 to 35 minutes after the injection. Pretreatment
with 66 µg Fab fragments or
-globulins ICV did not change baseline
values (data not shown, see Reference 1515 ). ICV Fab fragments nearly
abolished the MAP, RSNA, and HR responses to 0.6 µg ouabain ICV (Fig 2
). ICV
-globulins did not affect the responses to ouabain (Fig 2
).
|
|
Responses to ICV HHIF Without AVP-ant
No changes in MAP, HR, or RSNA were observed after
intravenous injection of 25 U HHIF (data not shown). MAP
started to rise in 10 to 20 seconds after ICV HHIF at each of the three
doses, reached a peak level, and then fell to a level about two thirds
of the peak within 2 minutes after the injection (Fig 1
). MAP then
stayed at this level for about 20 to 30 minutes. In contrast, HR and
RSNA decreased significantly 10 to 30 seconds after the ICV HHIF
injection and gradually returned to resting levels about 1 to 10
minutes after the injection (Fig 1
), depending on the doses applied.
Pretreatment with 66 µg Fab fragments ICV did not affect the
responses to 25 U HHIF ICV. The peak changes in MAP, HR, and RSNA
without and with Fab fragments are shown in Table 2
.
|
Responses to ICV HHIF With AVP-ant
Intravenous injection of AVP-ant at 30 µg/kg caused
transient, minor (P=NS) decreases in BP, HR, and RSNA (Fig 1
). In contrast to the responses without pretreatment, after
intravenous AVP-ant, ICV HHIF caused parallel increases in
MAP, HR, and RSNA (Fig 1
). The increases reached a plateau 2 to 5
minutes after the injections (Fig 1
) and lasted about 10 to 20 minutes.
The responses were dose-related (Fig 3
). ICV 66 µg Fab
fragments had no effect on MAP, HR, or RSNA responses to 25 U HHIF ICV
(Fig 3
).
|
In Vitro Na+,K+-ATPase Inhibitory
Activity
Table 3
shows two standard curves of
Na+,K+-ATPase inhibition by ouabain and HHIF
and the effects of Fab fragments on the inhibition of the enzyme. Both
compounds exhibited a dose-related inhibitory activity. The
inhibitory activity of 1 U HHIF was roughly equal to that
of 30 ng ouabain (decreased enzyme activity to 76.3% versus 77.8% of
controls). Fab fragments prevented the inhibitory effects
of ouabain in a dose-related manner (6 µg Fab fragments blocked
approximately 40 ng ouabain). In contrast, Fab fragments, even at a
dose of 100 µg, did not affect the inhibitory effect of
HHIF.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since the isolation and purification of HHIF several years ago, several studies in vitro have been conducted to evaluate the actual effects of this compound. Despite their different chemical structures,11 12 HHIF and ouabain have similar effects.20 21 22 23 Consistent with previous studies,10 11 the present study shows that HHIF and ouabain inhibit Na+,K+-ATPase in a dose-related manner. One unit HHIF inhibits Na+,K+-ATPase activity to the same extent as 30 ng ouabain. This is comparable to the results in vivo showing that peak responses to 25 U HHIF are similar to the responses to 0.6 µg ouabain.
The present study is the first demonstration of the biological activity of HHIF in vivo. In conscious rats, centrally administered HHIF induced a significant increase in BP but significant decreases in HR and RSNA. After intravenous AVP-ant, however, ICV HHIF caused parallel increases in BP, HR, and RSNA in a dose-related fashion that were very similar to those induced by ICV ouabain and brain "ouabain."15 In addition to its potent pressor effect, vasopressin also increases the sensitivity of the arterial baroreflex,24 25 possibly via a central action,26 and causes a greater increase in cardiac vagal efferent activity and decrease in sympathetic outflow in response to the increase in BP. Vasopressin also has a direct cardiodepressant effect to lower HR.27 Thus, intravenous vasopressin causes sympathoinhibition and bradycardia. The present study suggests that centrally administered HHIF can cause a pressor response by two mechanisms: HHIF appears to cause sympathoexcitation and hypertension, as does ouabain, but also appears to have a potent effect on vasopressin release; responses to the latter mask the sympathoexcitatory effects of HHIF. Similar to previous studies,8 9 28 ICV ouabain alone at the doses used in the present study caused only increases in HR and RSNA. Moreover, the sympathoexcitatory and pressor responses to ICV ouabain with and without AVP-ant are similar.8 14 28 Thus, it appears unlikely that ouabain, at least at the doses used, markedly increases vasopressin release. It is possible that after ICV injection, only compounds with a structure like HHIF but not ouabain can reach and inhibit the Na+,K+-ATPase in areas related to vasopressin synthesis or release.
Fab fragments did not affect the responses to central HHIF and its inhibitory effects on Na+,K+-ATPase activity in vitro. Fab fragments are capable of binding with high-affinity analogues of digitalis glycosides, such as digoxin,17 digitoxin,17 ouabain,10 and human16 and rat10 "ouabain." In vivo, Fab fragments may diffuse rapidly into the interstitial space and bind free glycosides with affinity higher than that for glycoside binding to the Na+,K+-ATPase,18 therefore preventing or reversing the responses to ouabain such as sympathoexcitation and hypertension.15 The failure of Fab fragments to block the effects of HHIF in vivo and in vitro confirms that HHIF as a sodium pump inhibitor is structurally different from ouabain and digitalis glycosides.
In summary, similar to ouabain and "ouabain,"6 in vitro HHIF inhibits the Na+,K+-ATPase activity in a dose-related manner; in conscious rats, ICV HHIF causes a sympathoexcitatory response, which, however, becomes apparent only after intravenous AVP-ant. Fab fragments block the effects of ouabain and "ouabain"6 15 but do not affect the responses to HHIF, which is in agreement with the previously proposed11 nonouabain structure of HHIF.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 5, 1996; first decision August 15, 1996; accepted December 5, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Mathews WR, Ducharme DW, Hamlyn JM, Harris DW, Mandel
F, Clark MA, Ludens JH. Mass spectral characterization of an
endogenous digitalis-like factor from human plasma.
Hypertension. 1991;17:930-935.
3.
Tymiak AA, Norman JA, Bolgar M, Didonato GC, Lee M,
Parker WL, Lo LC, Bevora N, Nakamishi K, Haber E, Haupert GT Jr.
Physiochemical characterization of an ouabain isomer isolated from
bovine hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:8189-8193.
4.
Ludens JH, Clark MA, Robinson FG, DuCharme DW.
Rats adrenal cortex is a source of a circulating ouabainlike
compound. Hypertension. 1992;19:721-724.
5.
Leenen FHH, Harmsen E, Yu H, Yuan B. Dietary
sodium stimulates ouabainlike activity in adrenalectomized
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H421-H424.
6.
Leenen FHH, Harmsen E, Yu H, Ou C. Effects of
dietary sodium on central and peripheral ouabainlike
activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J
Physiol. 1993;264:H2051-H2055.
7.
Cantiello HF, Chen E, Ray S, Haupert GT Jr.
Na+ pump in renal tubular cells is regulated by
endogenous Na+-K+-ATPase
inhibitor from hypothalamus. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:F574-F580.
8.
Huang BS, Leenen FHH. Blockade of brain
`ouabain' prevents sympathoexcitatory and
pressor responses to high sodium in SHR. Am J
Physiol. 1996;271:H103-H108.
9.
Huang BS, Leenen FHH. Brain `ouabain'
mediates the sympathoexcitatory and
hypertensive effects of high sodium intake in Dahl salt-sensitive
rats. Circ Res. 1994;74:586-595.
10.
Leenen FHH, Huang BS, Yu H, Yuan B. Brain
`ouabain' mediates sympathetic hyperactivity in congestive heart
failure. Circ Res. 1995;77:993-1000.
11. Illescas M, Ricote M, Mendez E, Robles RG, Sancho J. Complete purification of two identical Na-pump inhibitors isolated from bovine hypothalamus and hypophysis. FEBS Lett. 1990;261:436-440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Sancho JM, Garcia-Martin E, Garcia-Robles R, Santirso R, Villa E, Gutierrez-Merino C, Ricote M. Properties of the purified hypothalamic pituitary Na/K-ATPase inhibitor. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;22(suppl 2):S32-S34.
13. Ricote M, Garcia-Martin E, Sancho J, Gutierrez-Merino C. Modulation of the Ca2+ pump by the hypothalamic hypophysary inhibitory factor. Hypertension. 1995;25:367-371.
14. Takahashi H, Matsuzawa M, Okabayashi H, Suga K, Ikegaki I, Yoshimura M, Ijichi H, Okamura H, Murakami S, Ibata Y. Evidence for a digitalis-like substance in the hypothalamopituitary axis in rats: implications in central cardiovascular regulation associated with an excess intake of sodium. Jpn Circ J. 1987;51:1199-1207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Huang BS, Harmsen E, Yu H, Leenen FHH. Brain
ouabain-like activity and the
sympathoexcitatory and pressor effects of
central sodium in rats. Circ Res. 1992;71:1059-1066.
16. Balzan S, Montali U, Biver P, Ghione S. Digoxin-binding antibodies reverse the effect of endogenous digitalis-like compounds on Na,K-ATPase in erythrocytes. J Hypertens. 1991;9(suppl 6): S304-S305.
17.
Antman EM, Wenger TL, Butler VP, Haber E, Smith
TW. Treatment of 150 cases of life-threatening digitalis
intoxication with digoxin-specific Fab antibody fragments: final report
of a multicenter study. Circulation. 1990;81:1744-1752.
18. Butler VP Jr, Smith TW, Schmidt DH, Haber E. Immunological reversal of the effects of digoxin. Fed Proc. 1977;36:2235-2241.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Clineschmidt BV, Lis EV. Pharmacological evaluation ofd(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP as an antagonist of vasopressin-induced contraction of the isolated rat caudal artery. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1984;284:72-84.
20. Rodriguez-Barbero A, Martinez-Salgado C, Rodriguez-Lopez AM, Ricote M, Sancho J, Lopez-Novoa JM. Effects of hypothalamic-hypophysary inhibitory factor on mesangial call activation. Hypertension. 1995;26(part 1):905-911.
21.
Woolfson RG, Hilton PJ, Poston L. Effects of
ouabain and low sodium on contractility of human
resistance arteries. Hypertension. 1990;15:583-590.
22. Weber MA, Weiler E, Gonick HC, Prins BA, Purdy RE. Effects of a human-derived sodium transport inhibitor on in vitro vascular reactivity. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:754-761.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Mene P, Simonson S, Dunn MJ. Physiology of
mesangial cell. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:1347-1424.
24. Mohring J, Kintz J, Schoun J, McNeil JR. Pressor responsiveness and cardiovascular reflex activity in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats during vasopressin infusion. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1981;3:948-957.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Undesser KP, Hasser EM, Haywood JR, Johnson AK,
Bishop VS. Interaction of vasopressin with the area postrema in
arterial baroreflex function in conscious rabbits.
Circ Res. 1985;56:410-417.
26.
Courtice GP, Kwong TE, Lumbers ER, Potter EK.
Excitation of the cardiac vagus by vasopressin in mammals.
J Physiol. 1984;354:547-556.
27. Elliott JM, West MJ, Chalmers J. Effects of vasopressin on heart rate in conscious rabbits. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985;7:6-11.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Huang BS, Leenen FHH. Brain ouabain and central
effects of dietary sodium in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Circ Res. 1992;70:430-437.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Huang, B. N. Van Vliet, and F. H. H. Leenen Increases in CSF [Na+] precede the increases in blood pressure in Dahl S rats and SHR on a high-salt diet Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1160 - H1166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. I. Dmitrieva and P. A. Doris Cardiotonic Steroids: Potential Endogenous Sodium Pump Ligands with Diverse Function Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2002; 227(8): 561 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. De Wardener The Hypothalamus and Hypertension Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1599 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |