(Hypertension. 1997;30:191-198.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Section of Molecular Genetics, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, and Section of Cardiology (V.L.M.H.), Evans Department of Medicine, Boston (Mass) University School of Medicine.
Correspondence to Victoria L.M. Herrera, MD, Section of Molecular Genetics, W-609, Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, 80 E Concord St, Boston, MA 02118.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit genes as molecular probes and the Na+ ionophore
monensin to induce a dose-specific incremental increase in
[Na+]i in rat A10 embryonic aortic smooth
muscle cells. RNA blot analysis of rat A10 cells revealed a
dose-specific (0.022 to 30 µmol/L monensin) upregulation of
1-,
2-, and ß1-subunit
Na,K-ATPase RNA levels. Control ß-actin and
-tropomyosin RNA
levels did not change. With the use of chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) as reporter gene, CAT assays of rat
1[-1288]CAT and human
2[-798]CAT
promoter constructs exhibited induction of CAT activity in monensin
(10 µmol/L)treated A10 cells compared with untreated A10
cells. Promoter deletion constructs for rat
1[-1288]CAT defined a positive
Na+-response regulatory region within -358 to -169 that
is distinct from the basal transcriptional activation region of -155
to -49 previously defined. Similarly, a positive
Na+-response regulatory region is delimited to within -301
in the human
2 Na,K-ATPase 5' flanking region.
Analysis of transgenic TgH
2[-798]CAT rats
demonstrated sodium activation of human
2[-798]CAT
transgene expression in aorta parallel to observations made in rat A10
aortic tissue culture cells. Southwestern blot analysis of
nuclear extracts from monensin (10 µmol/L)treated and control
untreated A10 cells revealed a nuclear DNA binding protein
(approximately 95 kD) that is upregulated by increased
[Na+]i. These data provide initial
characterization of a transcriptional Na+-response
mechanism delimiting a positive Na+-response regulatory
region in two target genes (
1 and
2
Na,K-ATPase) as well as detection of a Na+-response nuclear
DNA binding protein. The in vitro data are corroborated by in vivo
experimental and transgenic promoter expression studies, thus
validating the biological relevance of the observations.
Key Words: monensin gene regulation muscle, smooth rats, transgenic
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In response to a given stimulus, short-term cellular changes that are immediate, classically involving changes in enzymatic activities and cell surface receptor activation, as well as longer term changes that involve transcription and translation could be expected. As seen in development, transcriptional events alter set points that contribute to paradigms of ordered and coordinate events relevant to organogenesis and patterning, to name a few.11 This transcriptional regulation-based paradigm forms the theoretical basis for the hypothesis investigated in this study, that is, that transcriptional sodium-response (Na+-response) mechanisms exist that effectively modulate salt-induced homeostatic changes as well as play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of salt-induced hypertension.
The current experimental evidence that supports the hypothesis of
putative transcriptional Na+-response mechanisms derives
from in vivo rat studies and in vitro tissue culture studies. In vivo
rat studies have identified a panel of candidate
Na+-response genes, such as the induction of gene
expression of the
1-subunit Na,K-ATPase gene in
prehypertensive salt-loaded Dahl salt-sensitive rat
kidney12 and the endothelin-1 gene in salt-loaded SHRSP
hearts.9 Salt loading in a normotensive Wistar rat also
induced
1 Na,K-ATPase mRNA levels in
aorta,13 indicating that putative Na+-response
mechanisms are most likely adaptive to restore Na+
homeostasis when challenged. However, when coupled with dysfunctional
hypertension gene products, Na+-response mechanisms
putatively go awry or amplify the primary dysfunction of said
hypertension genes and contribute to the pathogenesis of salt-sensitive
hypertension and/or its target-organ complications. It is also evident
that the Na+ induction of gene expression is targeted to
specific genes, distinguishing it from a generalized, nonspecific
cellular response.
The upregulation of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression by
high [Na+]i has been observed in tissue
culture systems regardless of the mode of induction of increased
[Na+]i, that is, by
veratridine,14 incubation in low-K+
medium,15 16 or serum.17 Given that other
cellular changes also occur that are distinct for veratridine,
low-K+ medium, and serum, the commonality of both the
increase in [Na+]i and induction of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression in these tissue culture
systems14 15 16 17 suggests that the
1
Na,K-ATPase gene is most likely a target gene of a putative
Na+-response transcriptional mechanism.
We investigated these issues in an integrated, stepwise manner and
present data that show dose-responsive increases in
1,
2, and ß1 Na,K-ATPase
RNA levels in rat A10 cells with increased
[Na+]i via monensin treatment (0.022
mol/L to 30 µmol/L); that define transcriptional
activation of rat (R)
1 Na,K-ATPase and human (H)
2 Na,K-ATPase promoterchloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) constructs in rat A10 cells treated with
10 µmol/L monensin; that delimit a
Na+-response regulatory region in both R
1
and H
2 Na,K-ATPase genes via promoter deletion
analysis of reporter gene activity; that document the
Na+ activation of H
2 Na,K-ATPase in a
transgenic rat model; and that detect a Na+-response
nuclear DNA binding protein upregulated in rat A10 cells with increased
[Na+]i via treatment with 10
µmol/L monensin.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA Blot Analysis
RNA blot analysis of total cellular RNA was done
essentially as described previously,13 with the following
specifications. Total cellular RNAs were isolated by the CsCl gradient
method using guanidinium thiocyanate as homogenizing
buffer. Concentrations of RNA were obtained by UV spectroscopy, and
equal amounts of RNA were loaded in formaldehyde agarose gels.
Nondegraded RNA was ascertained by ethidium bromide staining of
ribosomal RNA. New RNA blots were used in the analysis of
1,
2, and ß1 Na,K-ATPase
RNA levels. RNA blots were then stripped and probed with the control
probes
-tropomyosin and ß-actin. The specificity of all probes had
been previously ascertained.13 RNA levels were measured by
densitometry. Analyses of
1,
2,
and ß1 RNA levels were corrected for variation in loading
on the basis of control
-tropomyosin RNA levels. The degree of
induction (-fold increase) for
1,
2, and
ß1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression was assessed by the ratio
of corrected RNA levels with monensin over corrected baseline RNA level
(no monensin treatment).
Promoter Deletion Constructs
Deletion constructs were made in the pSP73 vector (Promega)
using the Erase-a-Base System kit (Promega) according to the
manufacturer's specifications. All deletion constructs were identified
by nucleotide sequencing and subcloned into a promoterless
CAT vector. Identification numbers were assigned on the basis of the
nucleotide position from the first transcription start site
identified respectively for the R
1 and H
2
Na,K-ATPase genes.18 19 The pCAT-basic vector (Promega)
was used for R
1 promoter deletion constructs; a
pSP73-CAT[SV40 polyA] vector was used for H
2 promoter
deletion constructs. We modified this vector so as to add more cloning
sites for promoter insertion into a CAT vector. All promoter deletion
CAT constructs were resequenced to ascertain deletion identity and
correct orientation with respect to the CAT coding region. Large-scale
DNA preparations were made by double CsCl gradients or Qiagen columns
per the manufacturer's specifications.
Transfection and CAT Assays of Rat A10 Cells
Transfection was done with Lipofectin (GIBCO-BRL) following the
manufacturer's specifications. To ascertain equivalent transfection of
control and monensin-treated A10 cells, a 2x Lipofectin-DNA cocktail
was made and divided for two culture plates that were then assigned as
test and cognate control plates. Equimolar amounts of promoter deletion
CAT constructs were used for transfection to validate comparative
analysis along with 5 µg of pSVß-galactosidase (Promega)
as internal control. DNA concentrations were determined by UV
spectroscopy and confirmed on agarose gels. Identical passage number of
A10 cells was maintained for the experiments. Transfection was done 24
hours after plating at identical densities based on cell count.
Transfected cells were maintained in growing medium for 24 hours. Then
test A10 cells were placed in growing medium containing 10
µmol/L monensin, and control cells were placed in fresh
growing medium containing an equivalent amount (5 µL) of vehicle
alone. Incubation in 10 µmol/L monensin or vehicle alone
(control) was carried out for 16 hours as determined by time course
studies (data not shown). These experimental conditions were maintained
throughout the study.
CAT assays were done essentially as described20 with the following specifications: protein concentrations were determined with the BCA (Pierce) assay per the manufacturer's instructions; equal amounts of protein extracts were used for all CAT assays to validate visual comparative analysis when transfection efficiencies varied less than 10% as determined by ß-galactosidase assays; and equal amounts of [14C]chloramphenicol (New England Nuclear) were used for all experimental points. Quantitative analysis was done by autoradiographic densitometry of acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol and nonacetylated substrate. CAT activity was determined as the percent conversion of acetylated [14C]chloramphenicol over total substrate used. Quantitative CAT activities were corrected for transfection efficiencies as determined by ß-galactosidase activity using the ß-galactosidase assay kit (Promega) per the manufacturer's instructions. The percent increase or decrease of CAT activity was determined from the ratio of CAT activity in monensin-treated A10 cells over untreated control cells per promoter deletion construct. This assessment is limited per promoter deletion construct because of varying levels of basal transcriptional activation with each promoter deletion construct. The percent increase or decrease reflects the capacity for each promoter construct for Na+ activation of transcription.
CAT Assays of TgH
2-CAT Transgenic Rats
We used the TgH
2[-798]CAT transgenic rat model
to validate the in vivo Na+ response of the
H
2 Na,K-ATPase -798 5' flanking regulatory
region.21 As described previously, this model reveals that
the development and tissue-specific expression patterns of
H
2 Na,K-ATPase gene expression, as reflected in the CAT
activity of the -798 5' flanking region, are similar to
R
2 Na,K-ATPase gene expression.21 The
TgH
2[-798]CAT88 line, Tg88, was chosen
because of optimal expression in the aorta.21 Test Tg88
male rats (n=4) were given a high salt (8% NaCl) diet for 2 weeks.
Littermate control Tg88 males (n=4) were maintained on normal rat chow.
After 2 weeks of high salt challenge, protein extracts were obtained
from aorta, brain, and heart. Aortic samples were pooled (two rats per
sample) because of tissue size. All other tissues were analyzed
individually.
All procedures were carried out in accordance with our institutional guidelines.
CAT assays were done on the cardiac left ventricle, brain, and aorta essentially as described.22 Protein concentrations were measured with the BCA assay (Pierce), and equal amounts of protein extract were used for CAT assays. CAT assays were set up essentially as described.20
Southwestern Blot Analysis
Cell nuclear extracts were prepared essentially as
described.20 Southwestern blot analysis was done
as described,20 with the following specifications: Equal
amounts of nuclear extracts were used for A10 cells and human
glioblastoma (HTB-17 [ATCC]) cell line; denaturation and renaturation
were done at 4°C. Monensin treatment was done as described above for
RNA analysis and CAT assays. Random-primed labeling was used to
make the 32P-labeled double-stranded DNA probe. The
standard protocol for Coomassie staining of protein gels was used.
Competition was done with 10-fold and 100-fold molar excesses of
unlabeled double-stranded DNA probe. The double-stranded DNA probe
spans -798 to +67 of the H
2 Na,K-ATPase gene.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1,
2, and
ß1 Na,K-ATPase Gene Expression by Na+Monensin is an antibiotic that mediates electroneutral exchange of external Na+ for internal H+, resulting in a rise in [Na+]i and fall in [H+]i.24 In rat parotid acinar cells, monensin increased [Na+]i in a concentration-dependent manner (0.01 to 100 µmol/L).25 Stable incremental elevations of [Na+]i by graded concentrations of monensin associated with increased Na,K-ATPase activity have also been described in adult rat liver (ARL) cells.26 In cultured rat neurons and C6 glioma cells, 10 µmol/L monensin induced a twofold rise in [Na+]i and stimulated Na,K-ATPase activity.27 This was associated with an increase in pHi by 0.4 to 0.5 unit and only a transient decline in membrane potential.27 High doses (100 µmol/L) of monensin induce other nonNa+-related cellular effects. By ascertaining the experimental doses of monensin usage at 10 µmol/L, a true Na+ response will be identified while maximizing the measurement of differential responses of transcriptional activation by increased [Na+]i.
RNA blot analysis of total cellular RNA of A10 cells treated
with increasing doses of monensin (22 nmol/L to 100
µmol/L) showed an increase in RNA levels of
1,
2, and ß1 Na,K-ATPase genes over baseline
levels (Fig 1
), in contrast with
ß-actin and
-tropomyosin genes, which remained unchanged up to
10 µmol/L monensin; these were then used as internal
controls. At 100 µmol/L monensin,
-tropomyosin
decreased, indicating the specificity of the increase of
1,
2, and ß1 Na,K-ATPase
RNA levels. Quantitative analysis of RNA levels by densitometry
corroborated the observed dose-specific upregulation of
1,
2, and ß1 Na,K-ATPase
RNA levels (Fig 1
).
|
Transcriptional Upregulation of
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPase Genes
The comparative advantage inherent in the analysis of the
5' flanking region of two
-subunit isoform genes,
1
and
2 Na,K-ATPase genes, and of two species, rat and
human, directed the design of the current study. Genomic clones of the
5' flanking regulatory region of both R
1[-1288]
Na,K-ATPase and H
2[-798] Na,K-ATPase were isolated
and characterized by sequence analysis, confirming identities
with previously published sequences18 19 (data not shown).
Promoter-reporter gene (CAT) expression minigenes were then constructed
for R
1[-1288] and H
2[-798] and
tested for functionality by CAT assays. Promoter-reporter gene
expression experiments documented basal activity of both
R
1[-1288]CAT and H
2[-798]CAT in rat
A10 (ATCC) cells and induction by 10 and 100 µmol/L
monensin treatment for 16 hours (data not shown). A panel of promoter
deletion constructs was then made for both R
1[-1288]
and H
2[-798] and tested together using identical
experimental conditions and equimolar amounts of promoter deletion
constructs (Figs 2
and 3
). The
ß-galactosidase (pSVß) plasmid was cotransfected as internal
control for transfection efficiency. Autoradiographic
signals were quantitated by densitometry and ß-galactosidase activity
was corrected for each point. The percent increase or decrease in CAT
activity with monensin treatment compared with baseline control
conditions was taken as the Na+-induced
activation/deactivation of transcription. Because basal activity is
affected by promoter deletions,28 the Na+
response was defined by the ratio of monensin-treated CAT activity over
baseline per promoter deletion construct.
|
|
As seen in Figs 2A
and 3A
, a spectrum of monensin-induced increased CAT
activity was detected. The highest levels of expression were detected
with the R
1[-375]CAT construct, at an 80% increase,
and the R
1[-358]CAT construct, at a 110% increase
(Fig 2A
). A lower induction level was noted with the
R
1[-169]CAT construct. These data delineate a
putative Na+-response element (Na+-RE) between
-358 and -169 in the R
1 Na,K-ATPase gene (Fig 2A
and 2B
) and indicate that other modifying elements, both positive and
negative, are most likely present farther 5' between -1288 and
-358. Likewise, for H
2 Na,K-ATPase deletion regulatory
CAT constructs, peak induction of CAT activity was detected with the
-301 CAT construct (Fig 3A
and 3B
), followed by 240% induction at
-570 and 50% induction at the -798 and -1576 CAT constructs. These
data delineate a putative major Na+-RE within 301 bp of the
transcription start site of the H
2 Na,K-ATPase 5'
flanking region but indicate that positive and negative
cis-acting regulatory elements modulating the
Na+ response also exist farther 5' between -1576 and
-301.
As seen in representative CAT assays wherein
transfection variation was less than 10% for valid visual comparative
analysis (Figs 2B
and 3B
), both R
1 and
H
2 promoter deletion constructs exhibited upregulation
with monensin treatment compared with baseline conditions; this
upregulation varied per promoter deletion construct (Figs 2A
and 3A
).
Additionally, the baseline level of R
1 Na,K-ATPase
promoter-CAT construct expression was greater than H
2
Na,K-ATPase promoter-CAT construct expression, consistent with
the relative ratios of endogenous levels of
1 to
2 Na,K-ATPase RNA in rat A10 cells
(Fig 1
).
Sodium Activation of H
2[-798]CAT
Transgene
To establish in vivo validation of the previously undescribed
induction of H
2[-798]CAT in rat A10 cells by
monensin-induced increased [Na+]i, we
analyzed salt-loaded (8% NaCl diet challenge) transgenic
Sprague-Dawley rats homozygous for the H
2[-798]CAT
gene (TgH
2[-798]CAT88) compared with
nonsalt-loaded (regular diet) TgH
2[-798]CAT rats.
The 8% NaCl diet is the established high salt diet used to elicit
salt-sensitive hypertension in the Dahl salt-sensitive rat
model.6 From four TgH
2[-798]CAT rat
lines with parallel tissue-specific expression of the transgene, one
line, Tg88, was chosen because it exhibited optimal
H
2[-798]CAT transgene expression in
aorta.21 Since the Sprague-Dawley rat strain is outbred,
varying responses to salt loading are expected. This is an
experimentally proven observation given that both the Dahl
salt-sensitive and Dahl salt-resistant rat lines were derived
from Sprague-Dawley rats. A representative experiment
of salt-responding TgH
2[-798]CAT88 rats
is shown in Fig 4
. In contrast to control
transgene rat littermates kept on a regular salt (0.4% NaCl) diet,
four Na+-loaded transgenic rats were found to exhibit
Na+-response activation of H
2[-798]CAT
transgene transcription. As seen in Fig 4
, CAT assays of equal amounts
of extracts from pooled aortas (two rats per sample) of
Na+-loaded TgH
2[-798]CAT rats (lanes 1
through 4) on high salt rat chow demonstrated upregulation of
H
2[-798]CAT activity compared with aortic extracts
from control nonNa+-loaded
TgH
2[-798]CAT rats (lanes 5 through 8) on normal rat
chow. Tissue extracts from total heart (data not shown) and total brain
(Fig 4
) did not show Na+-induced changes in salt-loaded
transgenic rats (lanes 1 through 4) compared with control transgenic
rats (single lanes 5 through 8), indicating specificity of
Na+ activation of H
2-CAT in aortic tissues.
These data corroborate the in vitro data detecting upregulation of
H
2 Na,K-ATPase promoter-CAT constructs in
monensin-treated rat A10 cells (Fig 1B
). These data mirror the
induction of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression in vitro in
monensin-treated rat aortic A10 cell experiments as well as in vivo in
aortas from salt-loaded rats13 and in transgenic rats
bearing the
1[-1288] promoterdirected minigene
(V.L.M.H. et al, unpublished data, 1997).
|
Na+-Response Nuclear DNA Binding Protein
To investigate putative Na+-response
trans-acting factors, we performed Southwestern blot
analysis and gained insight into the size, amount, and minimal
number of nuclear DNA binding proteins interacting with
Na+-response regions in rat A10 cells treated with 10
µmol/L monensin to increase [Na+]i.
At the outset, the simple definition of a putative
Na+-response DNA binding protein would be induction or
unique presence in monensin-treated rat A10 cell nuclear extracts
compared with control rat A10 cells. The H
2 Na,K-ATPase
-798 5' flanking region was used as probe.
As seen in Fig 5
, Southwestern blot
analysis of rat A10 nuclear proteins revealed binding of the
H
2[-798] probe to three nuclear DNA binding proteins
with molecular masses of approximately 41, 85, and 95 kD (Fig 5A
, lanes
3 and 4; Fig 5B
, lanes 1 through 6). Interestingly, the 95-kD protein
was increased in the monensin-treated rat A10 cells (Fig 5A
, lane 4;
Fig 5B
, lanes 2, 4, and 6) compared with control untreated cells (Fig 5A
, lane 3; Fig 5B
, lanes 1, 3, and 5). As seen in Fig 5A
, lanes 7 and
8, Southwestern blot analysis of human glioblastoma (HTB-17)
cell nuclear extracts did not detect any specific binding of nuclear
DNA binding proteins. Coomassie-stained lanes of both A10 (Fig 5A
, lanes 1 and 2) and HTB-17 (Fig 5A
, lanes 5 and 6) cells documented the
equivalent amounts of nuclear extract protein loaded, supporting the
specificity of nuclear DNA binding proteins detected. Furthermore, to
show specificity by competition, we performed Southwestern blot
analysis using identical experimental conditions with the
addition of unlabeled -798 probe in 10-fold and 100-fold molar
excesses (Fig 5B
). "Cold" unlabeled probe (lanes 3 through 6)
successfully diminished the amount of binding of the approximately 41-,
85-, and 95-kD nuclear DNA binding proteins compared with baseline
conditions (lanes 1 and 2) in both untreated (Fig 5B
, lanes 3 and 5)
and monensin-treated (Fig 5B
, lanes 4 and 6) A10 cells. This supports
the specificity of the binding of the H
2[-798] probe
to the approximately 41-, 85-, and 95-kD proteins. The upregulation of
the 95-kD protein by monensin treatment suggests that this protein most
likely represents a putative Na+-response
transcription factor and provides a glimpse into the
trans-acting component of the Na+-response
transcriptional machinery. We note that the rat
2
Na,K-ATPase probe gave identical results on Southwestern blot
analysis (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPase genes as target genes dually investigating
both cis-acting and trans-acting aspects. Data
from the analyses of
1[-1288] and
2[-798] Na,K-ATPase promoter regions identify a
positive Na+-response regulatory region to within -358 bp
from the transcription start site in both 5' flanking regions. When our
data delimiting the Na+-response region to -358 to -169
in the
1 Na,K-ATPase gene are correlated with previous
observations by Suzuki-Yagawa et al28 defining a positive
basal regulatory region for
1 Na,K-ATPase gene
expression in five different cell lines (MDCK canine kidney, HepG2
human liver, L6 rat skeletal myoblast, B103 rat neuroblastoma, and 3Y1
rat embryo fibroblast) to be between -155 and -49, it becomes
apparent that the
1 Na,K-ATPase gene
Na+-response regulatory region is outside the basal
activation regulatory region. These data suggest that the region from
-358 to -169 in the
1 Na,K-ATPase gene most likely
contains a positive Na+-RE inducing basal activation in the
presence of increased intracellular Na+. A parallel
situation is predicted in the H
2 Na,K-ATPase gene
because the Na+-response region is delineated within -301
bp of the 5' flanking sequences (Figs 2
2 Na,K-ATPase gene.29 The
identification of the core consensus sequences of the putative
Na+-RE remains to be determined, but the current data
localize the putative Na+-RE to within an approximately
200-bp region. Sequence homology between R
1 and
H
2 Na,K-ATPase in the Na+-response region
would facilitate further testing for putative core consensus sequences
of Na+-RE(s). Determining whether there is a conserved
Na+-RE between the
1 and
2
Na,K-ATPase genes or whether their respective Na+-REs are
distinct would also be highly informative. Distinct Na+-RE
consensus sequences would indicate a far more complex molecular
mechanism underlying salt-loadinduced responses.
The observation of a greater Na+ response by the promoter
deletion constructs R
1[-358]CAT and
H
2[-301]CAT compared with longer-length promoter
constructs reveals the likely presence of negative and other positive
regulatory sites 5' to these proximal regions. Intuitively, the use of
multiple positive and negative elements could contribute to mechanisms
of specificity and versatility of Na+-response gene
regulation in different pathophysiological states
and remains to be elucidated.
This study also provides insight into trans-acting
components of the hypothesized Na+-response transcriptional
mechanism. The coordinate upregulation of a nuclear DNA binding protein
(an approximately 95-kD protein) and the induction of gene expression
of its target gene (
2 Na,K-ATPase gene) suggest a
positive regulatory mechanism of gene regulation. A priori, a positive
feedback mechanism would ensure the continuing upregulation with
persistent increased [Na+]i. Intuitively, the
negative regulatory elements deduced from the promoter deletion
expression analysis (Fig 3
) would be involved in the turning
off of the Na+ response when
[Na+]i is normalized or presumably when a new
"steady state" is reached.
The concordance of our experimental in vitro tissue culture data and in
vivo experimental rat and transgenic rat data strengthen the deduced
implications as bona fide insights into a Na+-response
mechanism. More specifically, these parallel molecular events that we
have documented are as follows: (1) R
1-CAT activity is
greater than H
2-CAT activity in rat aortic A10 cells,
just as
1 Na,K-ATPase RNA levels are greater than
2 Na,K-ATPase RNA levels in rat aorta13 and
rat A10 cells (Fig 1
); (2) both
1 and ß1
Na,K-ATPase mRNA levels increase on increased
[Na+]i by monensin in in vitro rat A10 cells
(Fig 1
) as well as by high salt intake in in vivo rat
studies13 ; (3) H
2-CAT gene expression is
induced by increased Na+ load in rat A10 cell expression
experiments (Figs 2
and 3
) as well as in transgenic
TgH
2-CAT rats given a high salt diet (Fig 4
); and (4)
the R
1[-1288] promoter exhibits Na+
loadinduced activation in transgenic Dahl salt-sensitive rats
(unpublished data, 1997). These data suggest that the
Na+-RE core sequences to be identified using
R
1 and H
2 Na,K-ATPase as target genes in
the rat A10 monensin expression system will be biologically
relevant.
The Na+-response regulatory region delineated in the
monensinrat A10 aortic smooth muscle cell experimental system
described here is most likely distinct from the
Na+-response region proposed by Yamamoto et
al,30 which was delineated experimentally in rat primary
cardiomyocytes treated with 1 mmol/L ouabain.
Ouabain induced increases in the gene expression of all three
Na,K-ATPase
-subunit isoforms, which peaked at 60 minutes in
isolated rat heart cardiocytes and declined significantly
thereafter.30 The authors attributed this transient
induction of gene expression to measured increases in
[Na+]i on incubation with 1
mmol/L ouabain30 ; however, they did not explain the
deinduction of
1-,
2-, and
3-subunit RNA levels after 60 minutes despite the
continuing incubation in ouabain and the ensuing increase in
[Na+]i.30 Their observations of
a transient (60-minute) Na+ response30 are in
contrast to our in vitro data showing the persistence of
Na+ induction at 16 to 24 hours in rat A10 cells treated
with monensin (Fig 1
) and to previous in vivo data showing induction by
high salt intake of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression in
kidney after 3 days,12 in aorta after 2 and 4
weeks,13 and in kidney after 8 weeks (V.L.M.H. et al,
unpublished results, 1997) of high salt intake.
Perspective on Pathophysiology
The parallel study of both the
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPase genes is relevant to the study of
salt-sensitive hypertension since
1 Na,K-ATPase is the
sole
-subunit isoform in renal epithelial cells,31 32
whereas
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPases are both
present in vascular media.13 Delineation of a
Na+-response mechanism involving
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPase genes would contribute to the hierarchical
dissection of salt-induced molecular events that are pertinent to
hypertensive renal and vascular pathology. With the delineation of
1 and
2 Na,K-ATPase genes as
Na+-response target genes, it could be hypothesized that
the effects of their individual (renal) or combinatorial (vascular)
modulation could affect integrated tissue responses to multiple blood
pressure regulatory systems. This deduction is based on data
implicating Na,K-ATPases to be involved in respective
physiological effects of various blood pressure
regulatory hormones, such as
norepinephrine,33 34
dopamine,33 34 angiotensin,34 35
and atrial natriuretic peptide.34 Given a
normal genetic background, these Na+-induced responses
could be expected to be homeostatic. Given a pathological genetic
background, however, these Na+-induced responses could
contribute to salt-induced hypertension, as seen in the Dahl
salt-sensitive inbred rat,6 and in salt-induced stroke and
salt-induced increase in cardiac hypertrophy, as seen in
the SHRSP model.9 10 Additionally, Na+-induced
upregulation of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression could
affect cell growth characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cells
since cell proliferation is associated with higher levels of
1 Na,K-ATPase gene expression and since
1
Na,K-ATPase activity has been implicated as a general mechanism by
which basal transcriptional activity of c-fos is
modulated.36 This association might also account for the
increase in cardiac hypertrophy observed in salt-loaded
SHRSP compared with nonsalt-loaded SHRSP despite equivalent blood
pressure levels.9 Their respective roles in
Na+-induced homeostatic and
pathophysiological responses remain to be explored
and defined.
Because Na+-induced changes and pressure-overload changes
are equally cogent to the pathogenesis of hypertension, it is
interesting to note that
2 Na,K-ATPase is induced by
Na+ load but deinduced by pressure overload.13
In fact, this has been experimentally documented in the same transgenic
rat model.21 These observations suggest a logical
mechanistic hypothesis that pressure-overload deinduction of
2 Na,K-ATPase overrides the initial
Na+-response induction of
2 Na,K-ATPase in
aorta. It is significant to note that our experimental data indicate
that this hypothesis most likely applies to human pathogenic mechanisms
as well. This hypothesis remains to be tested in other target gene
systems.
The observations of parallel events in both R
2 and
H
2 Na,K-ATPase gene regulation in basal tissue-specific
expression as well as in responses to increased pressure
overload21 and increased Na+ load (the
present study) imply that the Na+ activation of
H
2 Na,K-ATPase observed here is a bona fide pattern of
modulation of the human gene. The concordance of tissue culture and
transgenic observations attests to the validation of the observation on
H
2 Na,K-ATPase regulation, albeit in rat A10 cells and
in transgenic rats. These experimental approximations provide a valid
extension of derived hypotheses into human pathogenic mechanisms.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 6, 1996; first decision October 10, 1996; accepted January 15, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit gene expression
in hypertension. Science. 1988;241:221-223.
1 Na,K-ATPase
subunit gene. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1049:286-292.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2 gene and identification of intra genic
restriction fragment length polymorphisms. J
Biol Chem. 1989;264:17532-17543.
-tropomyosin and N5 genes by a shared enhancer. J
Biol Chem. 1990;265:9555-9562.
2 Na,K-ATPase gene expression
in transgenic rats. Hypertension. 1997;29:606-612.
1 subunit gene promoter is composed of
multiple cis elements to which common and cell type-specific factors
bind. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:4046-4055.
2 subunit gene
promoter. Eur J Biochem. 1993;218:195-204.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-isoforms of Na,K-ATPase in rat kidney by
in situ hybridization. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:C468-C475.
1-,
2- and
3-isoform gene expression. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:C1301-C1312.
-adrenergic agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1993;90:21-24.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Efendiev, C. E. Budu, A. R. Cinelli, A. M. Bertorello, and C. H. Pedemonte Intracellular Na+ Regulates Dopamine and Angiotensin II Receptors Availability at the Plasma Membrane and Their Cellular Responses in Renal Epithelia J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28719 - 28726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Shumilina, Y. A. Negulyaev, E. A. Morachevskaya, H. Hinssen, and S. Y. Khaitlina Regulation of Sodium Channel Activity by Capping of Actin Filaments Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2003; 14(4): 1709 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Efendiev, A. M. Bertorello, R. Zandomeni, A. R. Cinelli, and C. H. Pedemonte Agonist-dependent Regulation of Renal Na+,K+-ATPase Activity Is Modulated by Intracellular Sodium Concentration J. Biol. Chem., March 22, 2002; 277(13): 11489 - 11496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sevieux, J. Alam, and E. Songu-Mize Effect of cyclic stretch on {alpha}-subunit mRNA expression of Na+-K+-ATPase in aortic smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): C1555 - C1560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Aydemir-Koksoy and J. C. Allen Regulation of Na+ pump expression by vascular smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1869 - H1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Constantinescu, J. C. Lane, J. Mak, B. Zavilowitz, and L. M. Satlin Na+-K+-ATPase-mediated basolateral rubidium uptake in the maturing rabbit cortical collecting duct Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): F1161 - F1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |