(Hypertension. 1997;30:295-300.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Division of Neurobiology, Department of Neurology & Neuroscience, Cornell University Medical College, New York City, NY.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: muscle, smooth angioplasty receptors, imidazoline proliferation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-adrenergic receptors to which all
I-receptor ligands also bind.4
Although stimulation of I-receptors has modest, if any, direct action
on vascular contraction,5 6 we have discovered that
agmatine and some imidazoline drugs can markedly inhibit the growth and
proliferation of VSMC of rat aorta, which is stimulated by
FCS.3 The antimitotic effects of the agents directly
correlate with their affinities at I2-subtype of
I-receptors but not I1-subtype or
2-adrenergic receptors. Moreover, the fact that agmatine
is synthesized and stored in
endothelium7 8 and is present in
normal serum9 10 has led us to propose that agmatine and
I-receptors may form a natural
endothelial/vascular smooth muscle system
controlling vascular growth.
In the present study, we sought to determine whether I-receptors are expressed in human VSMC and whether their activation also inhibits stimulated proliferation. Since mitogenic responses can be initiated at the cell surface by receptors coupled to G-protein (eg, angiotensin II, norepinephrine) pathways or by those using receptor tyrosine kinaselinked intracellular pathways (eg, PDGF),11 12 13 we also asked whether the antiproliferative actions are specific to one or both pathways. We report that cultured human coronary artery VSMC express I-receptors and that their activation by idazoxan or agmatine inhibits proliferation whether stimulated by a G-protein or receptor tyrosine kinase pathway.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary normal VSMC of human coronary artery were obtained from
Clonetics Corp and cultured in medium provided by the supplier. These
cells are well characterized and were monitored for phenotypic changes
by immunostaining with antibodies to
-smooth muscle
actin. These cells generally maintain their smooth muscle
phenotype for 3 to 4 passages. To obtain sufficient cell
membranes, confluent VSMC were used for receptor binding,
immunocytochemistry, and immunoblot analysis.
Because receptor expression does not change with stages of
confluency,3 semiconfluent cultures were used for
proliferation studies.
Ligand Binding Assay
Membranes from cultured cells were prepared, and ligand binding
assays were performed as described previously.3 Briefly,
cells were homogenized in PBS to disrupt the plasma
membrane and centrifuged at 600g to remove nucleus
and cell debris. The supernatant was centrifuged at
30 000g to obtain the plasma membrane pellet. The membrane
fraction was then homogenized in Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.7)
using a Polytron and centrifuged at 30 000g. The
membrane pellet was washed three times with Tris-HCl buffer, and the
final washed pellet was used for binding assays. Binding assays were
performed using 3H-idazoxan (5 nmol/L) as ligand,
and nonspecific binding was defined with 10 µmol/L cold
idazoxan. Agents that selectively bind to adrenergic receptors such as
epinephrine and rauwolscine were used to classify the binding
site as adrenergic or nonadrenergic. All binding data
were analyzed using the nonlinear curve fitting program
ligand.
Immunoblot Analysis
Western blot analysis of the solubilized membranes was
carried out as described previously3 15 with the use of
antiserum to I-receptor protein.3 This antiserum was
produced against a partially-purified I-receptor protein that has been
extensively characterized in previous reports.15 Membranes
were prepared from cultured VSMC and solubilized in 50
mmol/L Tris buffer (pH 7.4) that contained 5% sodium
dodecyl sulfate and proteins separated on a 10% sodium
dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel. After
electrophoresis had been performed, the proteins were
electrotransferred onto Immobilon-P membranes. The transferred
membranes were washed with PBS/0.05% Tween-20 and incubated with 5%
milk at 37°C for 30 minutes to block the remaining protein binding
sites. After blocking, membranes were washed twice with PBS and
incubated overnight at 4°C with antiserum to I-receptor protein
(1/5000 dilution) or preimmune serum.
After exposure to primary antiserum, blots were extensively washed and incubated for 1 hour with horseradish peroxidaseconjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1/10 000 dilution). Blots were then extensively washed and incubated for 1 minute in a 1:1 mixture of Amersham Enhanced Chemiluminescence detection solution. Blots were exposed to X-Omat film (Kodak) to visualize the immunoreactive bands.
Immunocytochemistry
Cultured VSMC were immunostained with specific
antibodies to I-receptor protein,15 PCNA (Sigma), or
-smooth muscle actin (Sigma) by the immunoperoxidase method.
Briefly, cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde
and blocks prepared with 0.5% BSA in 0.1 mol/L Tris-saline.
Cultures were incubated overnight with antiserum to I-receptor protein,
PCNA, or
-smooth muscle actin in 0.1% BSA containing Tris-saline at
4°C. Immunoreactivity was visualized by the sequential addition of
(1) biotinylated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG, 1:50 for 30 minutes;
(2) avidin-biotin complex, 1:100 for 30 minutes in 0.1% BSA containing
Tris-saline, pH 7.4; and (3) 3,3'-diaminobenzidine, 0.44 mg/100
mL Tris-saline with 10 µL of 30% hydrogen peroxide. Triton X-100
(0.1% to 0.3%) was included in all steps to
permeabilize the tissue and improve antibody
penetration. Cultures were rinsed in Tris-saline between each
incubation, dehydrated, and mounted.
Measurement of Proliferation
Proliferation of VSMC was assessed by measuring the replication
of DNA by 3H-thymidine incorporation, the expression of
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the assay of cell number
by MTT.
Methods for measurement of the incorporation of 3H-thymidine (DNA synthesis) and cell proliferation assays are described elsewhere.3 Briefly, cells were plated onto 24-well plates at a density of approximately 30 000 cells/well in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium in 10% FCS. After 48 hours, the cells were starved in 0.5% FCS for another 48 hours to decrease proliferation and induce quiescence. Drugs were added for a total period of 72 hours and 3H-thymidine (2 µCi/mL) added during the last 4 hours of incubation. The medium was aspirated and the cells washed three times with PBS and twice with ice-cold 10% trichloroacetic acid. Fixed cells were then solubilized in 0.2 mol/L NaOH and sonicated. An aliquot was used for scintillation counting.
Expression of PCNA, a prerequisite for DNA replication, was assessed by immunocytochemistry and immunoblot analysis using antibodies to PCNA (Sigma). In some experiments, proliferation of cells was determined by measuring the viable cell numbers by cell proliferation assays (Promega) based on the colorimetric measurement of formazon dye formed from tetrazolium salt (MTT) by mitochondrial dehydrogenases. All statistical analyses were performed by Student's t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Expression of I-Receptor Binding Protein in Human Coronary
Artery VSMC
To establish whether human coronary artery VSMC, like rat
aorta,3 express I-receptor protein, cultured cells were
immunostained or immunoblotted with a
polyclonal antiserum to an I-receptor binding protein isolated from
bovine adrenal chromaffin cells.16 This antiserum
specifically labels I-receptor protein in rat brain and cultured
astrocytes, rat aortic VSMC, bovine pulmonary artery
endothelial cells, and human brain
cells.3 17 18 19 In immunocytochemical analysis, most
human coronary artery VSMC were positively stained when exposed
to specific antiserum (Fig 2A
) but not to
preimmune serum (Fig 2C
).The staining was cytoplasmic and closely
associated with the nucleus (Fig 2B
) as in rat.3 The
labeled cells were VSMC since all cells in sister cultures were
positively stained with antibodies to
-smooth muscle actin (Fig 2D
).
|
For immunoblot (Western) analysis, solubilized
membranes of human coronary artery VSMC were exposed to
I-receptor antibody or preimmune serum. Antiserum, but not preimmune
serum, stained a prominent band of approximately 60 kD (Fig 3
). The size of the immunoreactive
protein is comparable to that obtained in membranes of rat aortic VSMC,
bovine adrenal chromaffin cells,15 and human
brain19 indicating that receptors in these species share
common structural elements.
|
Inhibition of Proliferation in Human Coronary Artery
VSMC
We investigated whether agmatine or idazoxan would inhibit the
stimulated proliferation of human coronary artery VSMC as they
do in rat VSMC. Two indices of proliferation were used: incorporation
of 3H-thymidine and expression of PCNA, a protein whose
expression is a prerequisite for DNA replication.
Idazoxan and agmatine each dose-dependently inhibited the incorporation
of 3H-thymidine into human coronary artery VSMC
when cells were exposed to 5% FCS (Fig 4
). Idazoxan was the more potent and
partially, yet significantly, inhibited replication at 1
µmol/L and completely inhibited it at 100
µmol/L. In contrast, agmatine reached significance at 10
µmol/L but even at 1 mmol/L did not totally block
the response.
|
Expression of PCNA was measured by immunocytochemistry using a
monoclonal antibody to the protein. As expected, serum-starved human
VSMC sparsely express PCNA (Fig 5A
).
After 24 hours' exposure to FCS (5%), most of the cells were
immunostained with PCNA antiserum (Fig 5B
). However, after
exposure of serum-starved cells to FCS (5%) in the presence of
idazoxan (10 µmol/L), PCNA immunostaining
was restricted to only a few cells (Fig 5C
). The effect of agmatine was
relatively less marked than idazoxan, although smaller numbers of cells
express PCNA (Fig 5D
) compared with FCS-treated controls.
|
To determine whether the inhibition of DNA replication results in a
decreased number of cells, the viable cell number was measured by the
MTT proliferation assay. Stimulation of proliferation by FCS (5%) for
24 hours resulted in approximately a twofold increase in the number of
cells compared with control (serum-free) cultures (Fig 6
). Exposure of cells to FCS (5%),
idazoxan (10 µmol/L), or agmatine (100
µmol/L) significantly reduced the number of cells compared
with FCS-treated cultures (Fig 6
). Thus, the inhibition of DNA
replication by idazoxan or agmatine actually results in a decreased
number of viable cells.
|
To assess whether the reduction of cell numbers was attributable to
toxicity of idazoxan or agmatine, we measured the release of lactate
dehydrogenase and changes of cellular morphology in cells
immunostained with
-smooth muscle actin after drug
treatment. Exposure of human coronary artery VSMC to idazoxan
(100 µmol/L) or agmatine (1 mmol/L) for 24
hours did not increase the concentration of lactate dehydrogenase in
the medium (data not shown) or the morphology of cells stained with
-smooth muscle actin (Fig 7
). These
results confirm our observations in rat VSMC, in which trypan blue
exclusion was used as an index, that neither drug is cytotoxic.
|
Effects of Idazoxan and Agmatine on Proliferation of VSMC
Stimulated by G-ProteinCoupled Receptors or PDGF
VSMC proliferation can be stimulated by agents that act
through one of the two principal classes of intracellular signal
transduction pathways: those coupled to G-proteins or to receptor
tyrosine kinases.20 21 We investigated whether the
antimitogenic actions of idazoxan and/or agmatine are
specific for one or the other of these pathways.
To differentiate between the two signaling pathways, we investigated the effects of idazoxan or agmatine on the proliferation of rat aortic and human coronary artery VSMC stimulated by (1) norepinephrine or angiotensin II, which act via G-protein coupling, or (2) PDGF, which activates receptor tyrosine kinase.
As expected, norepinephrine (10
µmol/L) and angiotensin II (1
µmol/L) increased the incorporation of
3H-thymidine into quiescent VSMC of rat aorta and human
coronary artery by about twofold
(Table
). The responses were significantly
inhibited by idazoxan (10 µmol/L) or agmatine (100
µmol/L) in both species (Table
).
|
Stimulation of quiescent VSMC by PDGF (10 ng/mL) increased
3H-thymidine incorporation by more than eightfold (550±140
dpm control versus 4500±850 dpm PDGF-treated). Idazoxan and agmatine
dose-dependently inhibited PDGF-stimulated incorporation in human VSMC
(Fig 8
). Similar results were obtained
using rat aortic VSMC (data not shown). Thus, the antiproliferative
actions of idazoxan and agmatine appear to be mediated at a downstream
step in the signal transduction cascade from cell surface
receptors.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
That cultured human coronary artery VSMC express I-receptors has been demonstrated by the facts that cells express a nonadrenergic binding site for 3H-idazoxan, a high-affinity ligand for I-receptors, and a protein cross-reacting with an antibody raised against an I-receptor binding protein, isolated from bovine adrenal medulla.15 The protein appears to be a constituent of I-receptor complex by virtue of its distinct localization and the fact that it shares comparable binding kinetics and drug selectivity with native receptors.16 Moreover, this antiserum recognizes I-receptor protein of various species such as rodent, bovine, and human, suggesting common epitope. While ligand binding studies revealed that I-receptors of rat aortic VSMC are of the I2-subclass, the paucity of human material has not permitted us to fully define the receptor subclass. However, initial ligand binding studies in which 3H-idazoxan was used suggest the presence of a nonadrenergic site in human VSMC that are probably of the I2-subclass.
As in rat aortic VSMC, idazoxan and agmatine inhibit proliferation of
human VSMC in vitro. This was demonstrated by a reduction in the
incorporation of 3H-thymidine into DNA, by expression of
PCNA, and by a reduction in total cell number unattributable to any
toxic action of these agents. Idazoxan, which has a higher affinity
than agmatine for the I2 receptor, was also a more potent
mitogenic inhibitor. Although agmatine, an
endogenous polyamine, dose-dependently inhibited
proliferation, only partial inhibition was achieved even at 1
mmol/L agmatine. Conceivably, the reason for the partial block
could be that agmatine may be metabolized to putrescine22
and to higher polyamines and that these metabolites may stimulate
cellular proliferation and thus counteract the antimitotic actions.
Moreover, such metabolic turnover of agmatine may also
explain why relatively higher concentrations of agmatine are required
to observe significant antiproliferative response. Although idazoxan
and agmatine both bind to
2-adrenergic receptors, the
antiproliferative responses cannot be attributed to that interaction
since
2-adrenergic agonists (eg, clonidine)
andantagonists (eg, rauwolscine) have no antiproliferative
actions.3
The site of action at which I-receptor agents impair stimulated mitogenesis is unknown. Mitogenic stimulation of VSMC can be initiated by two broad classes of cell membrane receptors that couple to two distinct intracellular signal transduction pathways.20 21 Growth factors, particularly PDGF, primarily activate a membrane receptor tyrosine kinase to trigger a series of intracellular events, including activation of PKC and several MAPK. The final enzyme in the cascade is MAPK (ERK 1 and ERK 2), which activates nuclear cyclin kinases (eg, p34 cdc2kinase) to generate expression of Fos and Myc proteins and, hence, promote DNA synthesis and cell division.12 23 24 25 26 27 In contrast, neurotransmitters and hormones,20 including ATP,28 activate G-proteincoupled receptors to generate intracellular second messengers including Ca2+ and diacylglycerol. Increases in diacylglycerol and intercellular Ca2+ activate PKC to promote proliferation either directly by an action at the nucleus or by activating the MAPK signaling cascade.26 The fact that idazoxan and agmatine inhibited proliferation stimulated by norepinephrine or angiotensin II indicates that the antiproliferative response is probably not at the receptor level. Moreover, since these agents also inhibited PDGF-stimulated proliferation, the site of action is not at the cell membrane but rather lies downstream in the signal transduction cascade, probably at a common intracellular site. Whether this site is within the cytosolic signaling pathways (eg, Ca2+ and PKC or MAPK cascade) or at the nuclear transcriptional level (eg, Fos or Myc) is not known.
In conclusion, we have now provided further evidence that human VSMC express I-receptors and that agonists at this site, including endogenous agmatine, inhibit proliferation of human and rat VSMC. These findings support the hypothesis that I-receptor/agmatine may be a novel system regulating growth and proliferation of VSMC. Thus, selective activation of I2 imidazoline sites by idazoxan and related compounds may be a novel strategy for the treatment of disorders resulting from increased proliferation of vascular VSMC.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 18, 1996; first decision October 12, 1996; accepted January 16, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Li G, Regunathan S, Barrow CJ, Eshraghi J, Cooper R,
Reis DJ. Agmatine is an endogenous
clonidine-displacing substance in brain. Science. 1994;263:966-969.
3.
Regunathan S, Youngson C, Raasch W, Wang H, Reis
DJ. Imadazoline receptors and agmatine in blood vessels: a novel
system inhibiting vascular smooth muscle proliferation.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;276:1272-1282.
4. Michel MC, Ernsberger P. Keeping an eye on the I-site: imidazoline preferring receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:369-370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Berdeu D, Gross R, Peuch R, Loubatieres-Mariani MM, Bertrand G. Evidence for two different imidazoline sites on pancreatic b cells and vascular bed in rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;275:91-98.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Gonzalez C, Regunathan S, Reis DJ, Estrada C. Agmatine, an endogenous modulator of noradrenergic neurotransmission in the rat tail artery. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;119:677-684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. London SM, Mayberg MR. Kinetics of bromodeoxyuridine uptake by smooth muscle cells after arterial injury. J Vasc Res. 1994;31:247-255.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Sers C, Riethmuller G, Johnson JP. Muc18, a
melanoma-progression associated molecule, and its potential role in
tumor vascularization and hematogenous spread. Cancer
Res. 1994;54:5689-5694.
9. Hancock WW, Adams DH, Wyner LR, Sayegh MH, Karnovsky MJ. Cd4+ mononuclear cells induce cytokine expression, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, and arterial occlusion after endothelial injury. Am J Pathol. 1994;145:1008-1014.[Abstract]
10. Cornwell TL, Soff GA, Traynor AE, Lincoln TM. Regulation of the expression of cyclic GMP-dependent protein kinase by cell density in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Vasc Res. 1994;31:330-337.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Chamley-Campbell JH, Campbell GR, Ross R. The
smooth muscle cell in culture. Physiol Rev. 1979;59:1-61.
12. Somlyo AP, Somlyo AV. Signal transduction and regulation in smooth muscle. Nature. 1994;372:231-236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Haller H, Lindschau C, Quass P, Distler A, Luft
FC. Differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the
regulation of protein kinase C-
. Circ Res. 1995;76:21-29.
14. Meyer-Lehnert H, Schrier RW. Potential mechanism of cyclosporin Ainduced vascular smooth muscle contraction. Hypertension. 1989;13:350-362.
15. Wang H, Regunathan S, Ruggiero DA, Reis DJ. Production and characterization of antibodies specific for the imidazoline receptor protein. Mol Pharmacol. 1993;43:509-515.[Abstract]
16. Wang H, Regunathan S, Meeley MP, Reis DJ. Isolation and characterization of imidazoline receptor protein from bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1992;42:792-801.[Abstract]
17. Ruggiero DA, Regunathan S, Wang H, Milner TA, Reis DJ. Distribution of imidazoline receptor binding protein in the central nervous system. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;763:208-221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Regunathan S, Feinstein DL, Reis DJ. Expression of non-adrenergic imidazoline sites in rat cerebral cortical astrocytes. J Neurosci Res. 1993;34:681-688.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Escriba PV, Sastre M, Wang H, Regunathan S, Reis DJ, Garcia-Sevilla JA. Immunodetection of putative imidazoline receptor proteins in the human and rat brain and other tissues. Neurosci Lett. 1994;178:81-84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Jackson CL, Schwartz SM. Pharmacology of smooth
muscle cell replication. Hypertension. 1992;20:713-736.
21. Pouyssegur J, Seuwen K. Transmembrane receptors and intracellular pathways that control cell proliferation. Annu Rev Physiol. 1992;54:195-210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sastre M, Regunathan S, Reis DJ. Agmatinase activity in rat brain: a metabolic pathway for the degradation of agmatine. J Neurochem. 1996;67:1761-1765.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. van Biesen T, Hawes BE, Luttrell DK, Krueger KM, Touhara K, Porfiri E, Sakaue M, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ. Receptor-tyrosine-kinase- and Gßy-mediated MAP kinase activation by a common signaling pathway. Nature. 1995;376:781-784.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Seger R, Krebs EG. The MAPK signaling cascade. FASEB J. 1996;9:726-735.[Abstract]
25. Moreno S, Hayles J, Nurse P. Regulation of p34 cdc2protein kinase during mitosis. Cell. 1989;58:361-372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Watson MH, Venance SL, Pang SC, Mak AS. Smooth muscle cell proliferation: expression and kinase activities of p34 cdc and mitogen-activated protein kinase homologue. Circ Res. 1993;73:109-117.[Abstract]
27. Irani K, Herzlinger S, Finkel T. Ras proteins regulate multiple mitogenic pathways in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;202:1252-1258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Erlinge D, Yoo H, Edvinsson L, Reis DJ, Wahlestedt
C. Mitogenic effects of ATP on vascular smooth
muscle cells vs other growth factors and sympathetic
cotransmitters. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H1089-H1097.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. A. Arndt, V. Battaglia, E. Parisi, M. J. Lortie, M. Isome, C. Baskerville, D. P. Pizzo, R. Ientile, S. Colombatto, A. Toninello, et al. The arginine metabolite agmatine protects mitochondrial function and confers resistance to cellular apoptosis Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): C1411 - C1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Babál, M. Ruchko, C. C. Campbell, S. P. Gilmour, J. L. Mitchell, J. W. Olson, and M. N. Gillespie Regulation of Ornithine Decarboxylase Activity and Polyamine Transport by Agmatine in Rat Pulmonary Artery Endothelial Cells J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 13, 2001; 296(2): 372 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Dumont, M. D'Amours, M. Lebel, and R. Lariviere Supplementation with a low dose of l-arginine reduces blood pressure and endothelin-1 production in hypertensive uraemic rats Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 746 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Greenberg, J. George, Y. Wollman, I. Shapira, S. Laniado, and G. Keren The Effect of Agmatine Administration on Ischemic-Reperfused Isolated Rat Heart Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, March 1, 2001; 6(1): 37 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Greenberg, A. Finkelstein, J. Gurevich, E. Brazowski, F. Rosenfeld, I. Shapira, J. George, S. Laniado, and G. Keren The Effect of Agmatine on Ischemic and Nonischemic Isolated Rat Heart Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 1999; 4(3): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |