(Hypertension. 1997;30:351.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Correspondence to Mohan K. Raizada, PhD, Professor and Associate Dean for Graduate Education, Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100274, Gainesville, FL 32610. E-mail mraizada{at}phys.med.ufl.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: receptors, angiotensin II MAP kinase phosphorylation angiotensin II rats, inbred SHR rats, inbred WKY
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite our understanding of the signal-transduction pathways involved in the cellular and physiological actions of the AT1 receptor in neurons, little is known about the mechanism by which these signals are terminated. Studies with other GPCRs have indicated that an agonist-induced phosphorylation of the GPCR plays a key role in the desensitization of the receptor and termination of physiological actions.10 11 Many specific GRKs have been characterized in recent years that specifically phosphorylate agonist-bound GPCRs.10 11 In view of the potential role of phosphorylation in the regulation of the functions of GPCRs, the present study was conducted with the following two objectives in mind: (1) to determine whether Ang II stimulates phosphorylation of the AT1 receptor and if so, whether MAP kinase is involved in this phosphorylation; and (2) to compare the rates and mechanisms of Ang IIinduced phosphorylation of AT1 receptors in neurons of WKY and SHR brains. In view of our previous observation that both AT1 receptors and AT1 receptor-mediated neuromodulation are increased in SHR brain neurons,4 5 we hypothesized that the rate of phosphorylation of the AT1 receptor would either not change or be decreased in these neurons compared with their normotensive WKY counterparts. Our observations show that Ang II stimulates AT1 receptor phosphorylation in the neurons of both strains of rats, an effect mediated by the activation of MAP kinase. The phosphorylation rate of the AT1 receptor in both WKY and SHR brain neurons was comparable.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol),
[32P]orthophosphate (1 mCi=37 MBq), and chemiluminescence
assay reagents were from Du Pont/NEN. Nitrocellulose membranes were
from Micron Separations, Inc. Ang II and MBP were purchased from Sigma
Chemical Co. Losartan potassium (Dup 753) was a gift from Du
Pont/Merck (Wilmington, Del). PD98059, H89, bis-indolylmaleimide, and
lavendustin A were purchased from Calbiochem. PD123319 was from RBI.
Polyclonal anti-rabbit AT1 receptor antibody (306,Sc-579)
was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (catalog No. 579). This
antipeptide antibody was raised against an AT1 receptor
peptide corresponding to amino acids306-359. The antibody
was specific for the AT1 receptor, did not cross-react with
the AT2 receptor, and was mouse, rat, and human reactive.
Anti-MAP kinase (C-14) polyclonal antibody that specifically recognizes
ERK-2 (and to a much lesser extent, ERK-1) and protein A/G
PLUSagarose were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. An
anti-rat MAP kinase polyclonal antibody (ERK-1 through ERK-3), which
recognized both the p42 and p44 isoforms of MAP kinase, and
activated mouse GST-p42 MAP kinase were from Upstate
Biotechnology, Inc. All other reagents were purchased from Fisher
Scientific and were of the highest quality available.
Hypothalamus-Brainstem Neuronal Cells in Primary Culture
Hypothalamus-brainstem areas of 1-day-old WKY and SHR brains
were dissected and brain cells were dissociated by trypsin. The
hypothalamic block contained the paraventricular nucleus
and the supraoptic, anterior, lateral, posterior, dorsomedial, and
ventromedial nuclei. The brainstem block contained the medulla
oblongata and pons. Dissociated brain cells were plated in
poly-L-lysineprecoated tissue-culture dishes
(2x107 cells per 100-mm-diameter dish) in DMEM containing
10% PDHS. Neuronal cultures were established essentially as previously
described.5 12 The cultures were allowed to grow for 15
days before use in experiments. Immunohistochemical and biochemical
analyses have repeatedly indicated that these cultures contain
90% neuronal cells and 15% astroglial cells and that cultures are
comparable from the two strains of rats.5 12
Immunoprecipitation
Neuronal cultures, established in 100-mm culture dishes, were
treated with Ang II. The cell lysates were prepared by adding 1 mL
lysis buffer (25 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 25
mmol/L NaCl; 1% Triton X-100; 1% deoxycholic acid; 1
mmol/L sodium orthovanadate; 10 mmol/L sodium
fluoride; 10 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate; 0.5
mmol/L EGTA; 1 mmol/L PMSF; 10 µg/mL
aprotinin; and 0.8 µg/mL leupeptin) and scraping the cells off
the culture dish. The lysates were centrifuged at
6000g for 10 minutes, and the protein content of the
supernatant was assessed by the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad
Laboratories). Supernatants containing 400 µg protein were subjected
to an immunoprecipitation protocol as follows. Samples were incubated
with 1 µg rabbit anti-AT1 receptor antibody overnight at
4°C, and AT1 receptor immunoreactivities were collected
on protein A/G PLUSagarose.8 13 The resulting
immunoprecipitates were washed three times with lysis buffer and used
in further experiments.
Immunoblotting
Each immunoprecipitate was suspended in 20 µL Laemmlis
sample buffer in a boiling water bath for 3 minutes, then
centrifuged. The resulting supernatant (10 µL) was
electrophoresed in 10% SDSpolyacrylamide gel and proteins
were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was
blocked by 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST (20 mmol/L Tris-HCl,
pH 8.0; 150 mmol/L NaCl; and 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 hour
followed by incubation for 1 hour at room temperature with either
rabbit anti-MAP kinase antibody or anti-AT1 receptor
antibody. Protein-bound antibody was detected by incubation of the
membrane with horseradish peroxidaselabeled second antibody and
enhanced by chemiluminescence assay reagents. The bands recognized by
the primary antibody were visualized by exposing the membrane to
x-ray film.8
Phosphorylation of AT1 Receptor by
Exogenous MAP Kinase
Phosphorylation of the AT1 receptor,
after its immunoprecipitation from the neuronal cell lysate by
anti-rabbit AT1 receptor antibody, was carried out with the
use of exogenous MAP kinase in a protocol based on that described by
Paxton et al.14 Briefly, neuronal cell lysates were
prepared as described above. Lysate containing equal amounts of protein
(400 µg) was incubated with 1 µg rabbit anti-AT1
receptor antibody overnight at 4°C, and AT1 receptor
immunoprecipitate was collected on protein A/G PLUSagarose. This
preparation was rinsed three times with lysis buffer and once with
kinase assay buffer (50 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.5; 0.1
mmol/L EDTA; and 0.015% Triton X-100). Immunoprecipitate was
suspended in 10 µL kinase assay buffer. For measurement of
phosphorylation, 10 µL of AT1 receptor
immunoprecipitate (
30 fmol/mg
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II binding
activity) was incubated with 0.3 IU MAP kinase, 0.1 mg/mL BSA,
and 0.2% ß-mercaptoethanol in a final volume of 20 µL. The
reaction was started by the addition of 10 µL ATP mixture (0.3
mmol/L ATP, 30 mmol/L MgCl, and 200 µCi
[
-32P]ATP per milliliter in kinase assay buffer) and
run for 0 to 15 minutes at 30°C. After the reaction was stopped by
adding phosphoric acid, samples were blotted onto Whatman GF/B filter
paper followed by washing the paper four times with ice-cold 0.5%
phosphoric acid and finally once with acetone essentially as described
elsewhere.14 The paper was allowed to dry and
radioactivity quantitated in a Beckman liquid scintillation counter.
Reaction mixtures that contained 3 µg MBP instead of AT1
receptor immunoprecipitate were used as the standard for the MAP kinase
phosphorylation assay. In some experiments, the kinase
reaction was stopped by the addition of 5x Laemmlis sample buffer
instead of phosphoric acid; samples were heated and
centrifuged, and the supernatant was electrophoresed in 10%
SDSpolyacrylamide gel. Proteins were then transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and subjected to
autoradiography. After autoradiography,
the same membrane was used for immunoblotting with
AT1 receptor antibody. Autoradiograms were
scanned using a UVP Imagestore 5000 system, and receptor
phosphorylation data were presented as the
observed density of the 32P-labeled band that was
normalized for AT1 receptor protein by densitometry using
the SW 5000 gel analysis program.
Labeling of Neuronal Cells With [32P]Orthophosphate
and Analysis of Phosphorylated
AT1 Receptor
Neuronal cultures were established for 15 days in 100-mm
culture dishes. Growth medium was removed and cultures were incubated
with phosphate-free DMEM containing dialyzed PDHS for 4 hours at
37°C, followed by prelabeling the cells with 1 mCi/mL
[32P]orthophosphate for 4 hours at 37°C. Ang II was
added and incubation continued for various time periods. Cultures were
immediately rinsed with ice-cold PBS three to four times, and lysates
were prepared in lysis buffer as described above. Cell lysates were
centrifuged at 6000g for 10 minutes and the
supernatants used to immunoprecipitate AT1 receptors
essentially as described above. Agarose beads containing
AT1 receptor were collected at 3000g for 10
minutes, washed three times in lysis buffer, resuspended in 20 µL
Laemmlis sample buffer, and heated to 100°C for 3 minutes. The
supernatant was electrophoresed in 10% SDSpolyacrylamide
gel, and proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride
membrane. The membrane was dried and subjected to
autoradiography. Densities of the
32P-labeled bands corresponding to AT1
receptors were scanned with the use of the UVP Imagestore 5000 system
and quantitated by the SW 5000 gel analysis program. Data were
normalized to the densities of total AT1 receptor in each
lane as determined by immunoblotting.
Binding of
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II to
AT1 Receptor Immunoprecipitates
Cell-free lysates (400 µg protein) were subjected to
immunoprecipitation by rabbit anti-AT1 receptor antibody as
described above. Immunoprecipitates containing AT1 receptor
were collected on protein A/G PLUSagarose and washed three times
with lysis buffer and once with kinase buffer. Immunoprecipitates were
subjected to phosphorylation by exogenous MAP kinase
essentially as described above. Immune complexes were rinsed with the
binding buffer (PBS, pH 7.2, containing 1.0% BSA) and used for
quantitation of
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II binding
as described previously.15 In brief, immune complexes
suspended in 0.5 mL binding buffer were incubated with 1 nmol/L
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II in the
presence of 10 µmol/L PD123319 for 1 hour at room
temperature to determine total binding. In addition, increasing
concentrations of losartan (0.01 nmol/L to 100
nmol/L) were used for competition-inhibition experiments. All
reactions were run in triplicate. The binding reaction was terminated
by filtration and collection of
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II bound to
receptors on Whatman GF/B filters presoaked with 0.3%
polyethyleneimine. Filters were washed three times with ice-cold
PBS, pH 7.2, to remove unbound radioligand, and bound
radioactivity was counted by a Beckman DP5500 gamma counter. Binding
was expressed as femtomoles
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II bound per
milligram of the cellular protein used to immunoprecipitate the
receptor. Specific binding was calculated by subtracting the
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II bound to
complex in the presence of losartan from that bound in its
absence. Scatchard analysis of the competition-inhibition
experiments was conducted to calculate Kd and
Bmax values using the EBDA-ligand program
(Elsevier-Biosoft).26
Data Analysis
Each experiment was conducted in triplicate culture dishes.
Cells in these dishes were derived from multiple brains of 1-day-old
rats. Each experiment was repeated three times unless indicated
otherwise. Images from autoradiograms were captured in
the UVP Imagestore 5000 system, and radioactive bands were quantitated
essentially as described elsewhere.8 Data from at least
three autoradiograms were quantitated and corrected for
equal loading with the use of AT1 receptor antibody,
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II binding
activity to the AT1 receptor, or another standard protein.
They are presented as mean±SE. Statistical analysis
was performed using ANOVA and Dunnetts tests.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
49 kD in both
WKY and SHR brain neurons (Fig 1A). Ang
II caused a time-dependent increase in the incorporation of
32P into this band, and a sixfold increase was observed in
WKY brain neurons in 15 minutes. This increase was followed by
50%
decrease in 32P incorporation by 30 minutes. Basal levels
of phosphorylation of 32P into
AT1 receptors were 65% higher in SHR brain neurons than in
WKY brain neurons in spite of a comparable time course of Ang II
stimulation (Fig 1B). As a result, the degree of stimulation
(approximately sixfold) of Ang II induced AT1 receptor
phosphorylation was comparable in both strains. This
conclusion was confirmed when AT1 receptor
phosphorylation data were normalized with the levels of
AT1 receptor immunoreactivity in both strains of neurons
(Fig 1C). The
49-kD band is AT1 receptor protein, on the
basis of the ability of the AT1 receptor-specific antibody
to recognize this protein16 and the observation that the
immunoprecipitated protein specifically binds
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II (see
discussion to follow). Fig 2 shows that
Ang IIinduced phosphorylation of neuronal
AT1 receptor was completely blocked by 10
µmol/L losartan but not by PD123319, an
AT2 receptor subtype antagonist. This
observation suggested that the occupancy by Ang II is important for
stimulation of the AT1 receptor
phosphorylation.
|
|
Next we studied the involvement of MAP kinase in Ang IIstimulated
phosphorylation of the AT1 receptor. The
rationale for this experiment was based on our previous studies, which
showed that Ang II stimulates MAP kinase in neurons.8 In
addition, MAP kinase has been implicated in the
phosphorylation of estrogen and epidermal growth factor
receptors.17 18 AT1 receptors were
immunoprecipitated from WKY and SHR brain neurons, and these
immunoprecipitates were subjected to an in vitro
phosphorylation assay with exogenous MAP kinase. Fig 3A shows that exogenous MAP kinase
catalyzed the phosphorylation of immunoprecipitated
AT1 receptors in a time-dependent manner and that the
phosphorylation in both strains of neurons was
comparable. MBP was used as an internal standard for MAP kinase
substrate. SDS-PAGE analysis of in vitro
phosphorylated immunoprecipitated AT1
receptors was carried out to confirm the identity of
phosphorylated protein. Fig 3B shows that the
49-kD
32P-labeled band was recognized by AT1 receptor
antibody on the immunoblot. In addition, incorporation of
32P into this band increased over time in both WKY and SHR
brain. This finding was consistent with the in vitro
phosphorylation data (Fig 3A). These observations
indicate that exogenous MAP kinase could phosphorylate the
AT1 receptor. Neuronal cultures were treated with PD98059,
a relatively selective inhibitor of MAP kinase kinase, in
an attempt to provide in vivo support for the above conclusion.
Cultures were prelabeled with [32P]orthophosphate for 4
hours followed by coincubation without or with Ang II in the presence
of 10 µmol/L PD98059. This concentration of PD98059 has
previously been shown to inhibit MAP kinase kinase
activity.19 In addition, a 90% inhibition of neuronal MAP
kinase activity using this treatment was observed. Fig 4 shows that PD98059 significantly
inhibited Ang IIstimulated phosphorylation of
AT1 receptors in both WKY and SHR brain neurons. Other
protein kinase inhibitors were used to further establish
the specificity of MAP kinase in Ang IIinduced
phosphorylation of the AT1 receptor. Fig 5 shows that basal AT1
receptor phosphorylation was not affected to any
significant degree by inhibitors of protein kinase A (H89)
and protein tyrosine kinase (lavendustin). However, Ang II stimulation
of AT1 receptor phosphorylation was
partially blocked by the PKC inhibitor
bis-indolylmaleimide. This observation was consistent with the
report that PKC phosphorylation sites are present
in the AT1 receptor and that Ang II stimulates neuronal
PKC.20 21 Inhibition of protein tyrosine kinase or protein
kinase A had little effect on phosphorylation.
|
|
|
Neuronal extracts were subjected to the immunoprecipitation protocol with the AT1 receptor antibody followed by immunoblotting with MAP kinase antibody to determine whether the AT1 receptor coprecipitates with MAP kinase. Fig 6 shows that a significant amount of MAP kinase appears to coimmunoprecipitate with AT1 receptor protein in control neurons. Treatment of WKY brain neurons with 100 nmol/L Ang II resulted in a time-dependent increase in coimmunoprecipitation of AT1 receptors with MAP kinase. The predominant band that coimmunoprecipitated with the AT1 receptor was the p42 isoform. With Ang II, maximal coimmunoprecipitation approximately fourfold over control levels was observed in 5 minutes. A similar stimulation of coimmunoprecipitation of AT1 receptor with MAP kinase was observed in Ang IItreated SHR brain neurons.
|
Finally, the effect of AT1 receptor phosphorylation by MAP kinase on the binding of 125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II was measured to determine whether phosphorylated receptors retain Ang II binding activity. Fig 7 shows Scatchard analyses of competition-inhibition data for nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated AT1 receptors from WKY and SHR brain neurons. Bmax values for nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated receptors were 58±6 and 7±4 fmol/mg protein, respectively, for WKY brain neurons. The Bmax values for nonphosphorylated and phosphorylated AT1 receptor from SHR brain neurons were 83±7 and 9±5 fmol/mg protein, respectively. Thus, phosphorylation resulted in an approximate 89% decrease in the Bmax in both WKY and SHR brain neurons. Kd values for nonphosphorylated receptors (0.5±0.03 nmol/L for both WKY and SHR) were comparable to those for MAP kinasephosphorylated receptors (0.4±0.02 nmol/L for both WKY and SHR). These data show that MAP kinasephosphorylated AT1 receptors are much less able to bind 125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II in both WKY and SHR brain neurons.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ang IIstimulated phosphorylation of neuronal AT1 receptors is consistent with a similar observation in vascular smooth muscle cells.14 The site of this phosphorylation could be localized in the intracellular domain, consistent with the presence of threonine, serine, and tyrosine residues in this region of the receptor.20 21 Although the precise mechanism of this phosphorylation remains to be fully worked out, our data suggest a key role for MAP kinase: (1) Exogenous MAP kinase phosphorylates AT1 receptors in both WKY and SHR brain neurons, (2) the MAP kinase kinase inhibitor PD98059 attenuates Ang IIstimulated phosphorylation (phosphorylation is not affected by inhibitors of protein tyrosine kinase or protein kinase A), (3) the MAP kinase coimmunoprecipitates with AT1 receptor, and (4) the MAP kinase recognition sequence (amino acids232-233) is present in the AT1b receptor subtype. Both the AT1a and AT1b subtypes of AT1 receptors are present in relatively equal proportions in WKY and SHR brain neuronal cells.5 These observations provide strong support for a direct involvement of MAP kinase in Ang IIinduced phosphorylation of AT1 receptors. However, alternate possibilities should not be totally discounted at the present. For example, the involvement of another GRK (such as ßARK1) in the phosphorylation of AT1 receptor cannot be ruled out. It is likely that Ang II stimulation of MAP kinase results in the phosphorylation and activation of other GRKs, which in turn phosphorylate the AT1 receptor. This view is supported by recent data demonstrating AT1 receptor phosphorylation by ßARK1.22 In addition, the MAP kinase recognition sequence is present in ßARK1.23
An important question that arises from these studies concerns the
physiological implications of AT1
receptor phosphorylation. It is reasonable to suggest
that the phosphorylation event may be responsible for
Ang II induced desensitization and internalization of
AT1 receptors from the neuronal plasma membrane. This view
is supported by our data on the loss of
125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II binding
ability of phosphorylated AT1 receptors and
consistent with the proposed role of
phosphorylation in the agonist-induced desensitization
of other GPCRs, such as ß- and
-adrenergic
receptors.10 11 Preliminary data indicating that Ang II
induces internalization of cell-surface AT1 receptors
further support this proposal.27
Neuronal cells from the SHR brain express twofold to fourfold higher functional AT1 receptors than WKY brain neurons.5 This increase is associated with a 65% higher basal level of phosphorylated AT1 receptor in these cells. However, the rate of phosphorylation, degree of stimulation by Ang II, and involvement of MAP kinase were comparable in the two strains of neurons. This observation indicates that the Ang IImediated phosphorylation mechanism of the AT1 receptor is similar in WKY and SHR brain neurons. In addition, phosphorylation results in a comparable loss of 125I-[Sar1-Ile8]-Ang II binding to AT1 receptors in both strains of neurons. Thus, in spite of higher levels of AT1 receptors and enhanced Ang IIinduced neuromodulatory actions in SHR brain neurons,4 5 the rate of their inactivation is comparable, supporting our previous hypothesis that chronic neuromodulatory actions of Ang II on neurons may be distinctly regulated.
Ang II stimulates MAP kinase in neuronal cells in an
Ras-Raf-1dependent signaling pathway.8 This
stimulation has been associated with Ang II regulation of chronic
neuromodulation.8 9 Involvement of MAP kinase in
AT1 receptor-mediated regulation of neuromodulation is a
unique event for a stimulatory GPCR that may involve interaction of one
or more factors with the Gß
subunit of
Gq.24 25 Thus, it is intriguing to suggest that activation
of MAP kinase by Ang II potentially leads to both the stimulatory
action of the AT1 receptor on neuromodulation and
desensitization followed by internalization of AT1
receptors in neurons. A precise time sequence of signaling events will
have to be elucidated and specific signaling molecules need to be
identified to explain the specificity of these two opposing effects of
Ang II mediated by AT1 receptors.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received September 19, 1996; first decision October 21, 1996; accepted February 5, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Lu D, Yu K, Paddy MR, Rowland NE, Raizada MK. Regulation of norepinephrine transport system by angiotensin II in neuronal cultures of normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rat brains. Endocrinology. 1996;137:763-772.[Abstract]
3. Steckelings V, Lebrun C, Quadri F, Veltman A, Unger T. Role of brain angiotensin in cardiovascular regulation. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19(suppl 6):S73-S79.
4. Raizada MK, Lu D, Sumners C. AT1 receptors and angiotensin actions in the brain and neuronal cultures of normotensive and hypertensive rats. In: Mukhopadhyay A, Raizada MK, eds. Current Concepts: Tissue Renin-Angiotensin System as Local Regulators in Reproductive and Endocrine Organs. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1994:331-348.
5. Raizada MK, Lu D, Tang W, Kurian P, Sumners C.
Increased angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene expression in
neuronal cultures from spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Endocrinology. 1993;132:1715-1722.
6. Ding H, Zhou Q, Deng J, Lao HY, Yang K. Effect of overactivated central renin-angiotensin system on the concentration of brain norepinephrine and epinephrine in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats and its significance. Sheng Li Hsueh Pao. 1990;42:379-384.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Yang K, Ding H, Zhou Q, Luo HY, Wu ZY. Central norepinephrine and angiotensin II contents in the brain regions of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and the interaction between them. Sheng Li Hsueh Pao. 1991;43:345-351.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Yang H, Lu D, Yu K, Raizada MK. Regulation of
neuromodulatory actions of angiotensin II in the brain
neurons by the Ras-dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase
pathway. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4047-4058.
9. Lu D, Yang H, Raizada MK. Angiotensin II regulation of neuromodulation: downstream signalling mechanism from activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Cell Biol. 1996,135:1609-1617.
10. Lefkowitz RJ. G-protein coupled receptor kinase. Cell. 1993;74:409-412.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Premont RT, Inglese J, Lefkowitz RJ. Protein kinases that phosphorylate activated G-proteincoupled receptors. FASEB J. 1995;9:175-182.[Abstract]
12. Raizada MK, Muther TF, Sumners C. Increased angiotensin II specific receptors in neuronal culture of spontaneously hypertensive rat brain. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:C364-C372.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Marrero MB, Schieffer B, Paxton WG, Heerdt L, Berk BC, Delafontaine P, Bernstein KE. Direct stimulation of Jak/STAT pathway by the angiotensin II AT1 receptor. Nature. 1995;375:247-250.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Paxton WG, Marrero MB, Klein JD, Delafontaine P, Berk BC, Bernstein KE. The angiotensin II AT1 receptor is tyrosine and serine phosphorylated and can serve as a substrate for the src family of tyrosine kinases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;200:260-267.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Abramowski D, Staufenbiel M. Identification of the 5-hydroxytryptamine-2C receptor as a 60-kDa N-glycosylated protein in choroid plexus and hippocampus. J Neurochem. 1995;65:782-790.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Paxton WG, Runge M, Horaist C, Cohen C, Alexander RW, Bernstein KE. Immunohistochemical localization of rat angiotensin II AT1 receptor. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F989-F995.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kato S, Endoh H, Masuhiro Y, Kitamoto T, Uchiyama S,
Sasaki H, Masushige S, Gotoh Y, Nishida E, Kawashima H, Metzger D,
Chambon P. Activation of the estrogen receptor through
phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein
kinase. Science. 1995;270:1491-1494.
18. Morrison P, Takishima K, Rosner MR. Role of
threonine residues in regulation of the epidermal growth factor
receptor by protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein
kinase. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:15536-15543.
19. Alessi DR, Cuenda A, Cohen P, Dudley DT, Saltie
AR. PD98059 is a specific inhibitor of the
activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro
and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:27489-27494.
20. Inagami T, Iwai N, Sasaki K, Yamano Y, Bardhan S, Chaki S, Guo DF, Furuta H. Cloning, expression and regulation of angiotensin II receptors. In: Raizada MK, Phillips MI, Sumners C, eds. Cellular and Molecular Biology of Renin-Angiotensin System. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1993:273-291.
21. Catt KJ, Sandberg K, Balla T. Angiotensin II receptor and signal transduction mechanisms. In: Raizada MK, Phillips MI, Sumners C, eds. Cellular and Molecular Biology of the Renin-Angiotensin System. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1993:307-356.
22. Oppermann M, Freedman NJ, Alexander RW, Lefkowitz
RJ. Phosphorylation of the type 1A
angiotensin II receptor by G-protein coupled receptor
kinases and protein kinase C. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:13266-13272.
23. Arriza JL, Dawson TM, Simerly RB, Martin LJ, Caron MG, Snyder SH, Lefkowitz RJ. The G-proteincoupled receptor kinases ß-ARK1 and ß-ARK2 are widely distributed at synapses in rat brain. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4045-4055.[Abstract]
24. Hawes BE, VanBiesen TV, Koch WJ, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz
RJ. Distinct pathways of Gi- and Gq-mediated
mitogen-activated protein kinase activation.
J Biol Chem. 1995;270:17148-17153.
25. Inglese J, Koch WJ, Touhara K, Lefkowitz RJ.
Gß
interactions with PH domains and
Ras-MAPK signaling pathways. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:151-156.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Yang H, Lu D, Raizada MK. Lack of cross-talk
between
1-adrenergic and AT1 receptors in
neurons of spontaneously hypertensive rat brain.
Hypertension. 1996;27:1277-1283.
27. Yang H, Lu D, Vinson GP, Raizada MK. Involvement of MAP kinase
in angiotensin IIinduced phosphorylation and intracellular targeting
of neuronal AT1 receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1660-1669.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. W. Pickard, A. B. Hodsman, L. J. Fraher, and P. H. Watson Type 1 Parathyroid Hormone Receptor (PTH1R) Nuclear Trafficking: Regulation of PTH1R Nuclear-Cytoplasmic Shuttling by Importin-{alpha}/{beta} and Chromosomal Region Maintenance 1/Exportin 1 Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2282 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Imayama, T. Ichiki, K. Inanaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Fukuyama, H. Ono, Y. Hashiguchi, and K. Sunagawa Telmisartan downregulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2006; 72(1): 184 - 190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Thibonnier, D. M. Conarty, and C. L. Plesnicher Mediators of the mitogenic action of human V1 vascular vasopressin receptors Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2529 - H2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Day, L. A. Rafty, C. N. Chesterman, and L. M. Khachigian Angiotensin II (ATII)-inducible Platelet-derived Growth Factor A-chain Gene Expression Is p42/44 Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase-1/2 and Egr-1-dependent and Mediated via the ATII Type 1 but Not Type 2 Receptor. INDUCTION BY ATII ANTAGONIZED BY NITRIC OXIDE J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 1999; 274(34): 23726 - 23733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |