(Hypertension. 1997;30:699.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Correspondence to Dr Eduardo M. Krieger, Hypertension Unit, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo, Av Dr Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44, 05403-000 São Paulo, Brazil.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: chemoreflex cardiovascular control blood pressure hemodynamics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The type, intensity, and duration of the stimulus used to activate the chemoreflex also affects the final cardiovascular responses. The stimulus per se may affect directly other neural or local vascular and cardiac mechanisms. These effects may dominate or mask the final cardiovascular responses to chemoreceptor stimulation. For example, hypoxemia, the natural stimulus, in addition to the direct activation of the carotid body chemoreceptors, influences the vascular and cardiac muscle contractility, favoring vasodilatation and reduction in cardiac output. Depending on the intensity and duration of the hypoxia, the effects on vascular and cardiac muscles may dominate the vascular response over the sympathetic activation inducing vasodilatation and decrease in arterial pressure.7 8 9
In previous studies,5 10 we reported the cardiovascular and ventilatory responses to chemoreflex activation by intravenous injections of KCN. This maneuver eliminates some of the difficulties imposed by the multiplicity of actions of the natural peripheral chemoreceptor stimulants (hypoxia and hypercapnia), especially the direct cardiac and vascular influences. Moreover, this allows the study of cardiovascular responses to chemoreceptor stimulation in unanesthetized rats, an animal too small for the necessary instrumentation for direct stimulation of peripheral chemoreceptors in chronic preparations. Typically, intravenous KCN produces, in the first 10 seconds following the injection, a dose-related bradycardia, pressor responses, tachypnea, and alerting. These responses almost completely disappear after carotid body chemoreceptor elimination. Experiments performed with autonomic blockers indicated that the marked bradycardia was almost exclusively related to cardiac parasympathetic activation and the pressor responses to vascular sympathetic activation.
In our previous studies the role of neural mechanisms in the cardiovascular responses to chemoreflex activation by KCN was clarified in some extension. However, the cardiovascular parameters used to assess the cardiovascular responses (heart rate and blood pressure) did not allow a more complete description of the hemodynamics and mechanisms involved in the cardiovascular responses to chemoreflex activation by this maneuver. To study the response of the systemic hemodynamic parameters to chemoreflex evoked by KCN, rats were chronically instrumented with transit-time ultrasonic flow probes in the ascendant aorta, along with arterial and venous catheters, and KCN injections were performed. The effect of the cardiac parasympathetic activation on the cardiac output responses was obtained by comparing the responses before and after atropine administration. To assess the influence of the cardiac sympathetic effects on the cardiac output responses to KCN, injection of this drug was performed after propranolol administration.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Surgical Preparation
For instrumentation the rats were anesthetized with a
mixture of ketamine (100 mg/kg IM) and diazepam (1.5
mg/kg IM) and placed on a heated surgical table to maintain body
temperature at 37°C. The trachea was cannulated with a Gelco tube and
the ventilation controlled with a Harvard ventilator for small animals
(model 683). Tygon and polyvinyltipped cannulas were placed in the
femoral artery and vein, tunneled subcutaneously, and exteriorized at
the back of the neck. Transonics 2SB flow probes were implanted in the
ascending thoracic aorta at the same surgical time as the vascular
catheterization throughout a thoracotomy performed at
the third right intercostal space. These surgical procedures were
performed under aseptic conditions, and in the recovery period all
animals received a single intravenous dose of penicillin G
benzathine (Benzetacil, Fontoura-Wyeth), 60 000 U. Animals were
allowed to recover for 5 days before study.
Hemodynamic Measurements
Pulsatile arterial pressure and cardiac output
were monitored continuously during the experiments. The
arterial catheter was connected to a COBE transducer
(Arvada), and the signal was amplified with a GP4A-General Purpouse
Amplifier (Stemtech). The ultrasonic volume flowsensor was connected to
a T206 Transonic flowmeter. The amplifier and flowmeter outputs were
connected to an A/D board and this to a computer loaded with a CODAS
Data Acquisition software (AT-CODAS; DATAQ Instruments). Blood pressure
and cardiac output were continuously recorded at a sample rate of
100 Hz each. Stroke volume was calculated from the following formula:
Stroke Volume=Cardiac Output/Heart Rate. Total peripheral
resistance was calculated from the following formula: Total
Peripheral Resistance=Mean Arterial
Pressure/Cardiac Output. Heart rate was obtained from the average of
the intervals between two systolic peaks in pulsatile blood
pressure recordings.
Chemoreflex
Chemoreflex was activated by intravenous
injections of KCN, as described previously.5 KCN solution
in distilled water was prepared fresh every day, protected from the
light with aluminum foil, and injected intravenously in a
dose of 30 µg/kg in volumes of 0.15 to 0.0 mL per injection.
The analysis of the cardiovascular responses to
KCN injection for individual rats was performed as follows. Baseline
blood pressure, cardiac output, and heart rate were taken immediately
prior to the KCN injection. Changes in blood pressure were determined
by the difference of the baseline values and the maximum increase,
while changes in cardiac output and heart rate were determined by the
difference of baseline values and the maximum decrease following KCN
injection. In some animals a brisk fall in blood pressure preceded the
pressor responses, as indicated in the example of Fig 1a. In the animals in which this
phenomena occurred this was not considered for the analysis of
the pressor responses to KCN.
|
Experimental Protocol
Pulsatile blood pressure and cardiac output were monitored
continuously for a variable control period (
30 minutes) until
the animals remained quiet in a Plexiglas cage and the systemic
hemodynamic variables were stable. The experiments
were repeated in two consecutive days in the same animals. After
hemodynamic stability was reached, three separate
injections of a single dose of KCN were performed in the animals. This
was done because the cardiovascular responses to KCN
are somewhat variable. The injections were separated by a 10 minute
period or until the cardiovascular
parameters had returned to control values. After this
section, atropine (4 mg/kg) was administered
intravenously and again 10 minutes after the KCN injections
were repeated. Sequentially, propranolol (4 mg/kg)
was administered intravenously and again 10 minutes after
the KCN injections were repeated. The doses of atropine and
propranolol were tested in a separate group of rats for the
effectiveness of the autonomic blockade. The experiments were repeated
in two consecutive days in the same animals, and the data of each day
were averaged to give a single value per rat. The data of systemic
hemodynamics for the three KCN injections under each
condition (ie, before and after autonomic blockade) were averaged, and
the values obtained for each day were again averaged to produce a
single value per rat.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Differences among mean
values between different treatments were tested with one-way ANOVA.
Duncans multiple-range test was used as a post hoc analysis
if the probability from the F test was <.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Effect of Autonomic Blockade on Hemodynamic Responses
Administration of atropine increased resting heart rate to 424±6
bpm. Mean arterial pressure (112±2.9 mm Hg), cardiac
output (89±3.6 mL/min), and the calculated stroke volume (0.21±0.012)
did not change significantly, compared with values before atropine
administration. Fig 1b shows the cardiovascular
response to KCN after atropine administration in the same rat shown in
Fig 1a. Atropine clearly attenuated the bradycardia to chemoreflex that
was evoked by KCN. The average responses are demonstrated in Fig 2.
Heart rate decreased by -109±29 bpm (26%), while the responses of
cardiac output (-55±6.6 mL/min, 62%) and stroke volume (0,1±0.015
mL, 48%) were not different from the responses observed in the control
period. The pressor response was potentiated by atropine (66±3.8
mm Hg, 59%) and the calculated total peripheral
resistance increased 9.5±2.2.
The sequential administration of propranolol decreased heart rate to 390±11 bpm, while mean arterial pressure (127±2 mm Hg), cardiac output (72±3.7), calculated stroke volume (0.19±0.01 mL), and total peripheral resistance (1.8±0.09 PRU) did not change significantly, compared with the same parameters after atropine administration (Fig 1c). In response to KCN, heart rate decreased -158 bpm (40%) and blood pressure increased 58±5 mm Hg (46%) after propranolol administration. The cardiac output decreased 67% (-47±7.6 mL/min) and calculated stroke volume decreased 44% (-0.08±0.01 mL). These differences were not statistically significant compared with the responses observed after atropine administration.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to the previously reported bradycardia and pressor response, the present data demonstrated that the chemoreflex activation evoked by intravenous KCN in unanesthetized rats produces a marked decrease in cardiac output and an increase in total peripheral resistance. The decrease in cardiac output was due to a simultaneous decrease in heart rate and in stroke volume. Bradycardia in response to KCN is mostly determined by the cardiac parasympathetic activation. This was indicated in the present study and in previous studies by the marked attenuation in the heart rate decrease after atropine administration. This is probably uniquely related to a direct parasympathetic activation by the chemoreceptors afferent fibers. Simultaneous activation of cardiovascular mechanoreceptors could also be claimed to contribute to this response. However, some characteristics of the response appear to negate a role for the mechanoreceptors influence. Activation of mechanoreceptors produces changes in heart rate of lower magnitude than those observed with KCN. The actual increase in pressure (as seen in Fig 1a), occurs after the maximum fall in heart rate or cardiac output. Thus, it seems unlikely that the increase in blood pressure, which occurs later, would be responsible for activating the cardiac or arterial baroreceptors to produce the effects observed. Finally, in previous studies the elimination of aortic baroreceptors (the most important baroreceptor contingent in the rat), did not change the magnitude of the heart rate responses to KCN. The decrease in stroke volume also contributed to the observed decrease in cardiac output during KCN-induced chemoreflex. Our present data indicate that the decrease in stroke volume during chemoreflex activation by KCN may be related to the augmented cardiac afterload produced by the sudden rise in blood pressure.
Different from data obtained with local stimulation of carotid body chemoreceptors in anesthetized rats2 6 and in unanesthetized rats subjected to systemic hypoxia,7 9 the data from the present study indicated that the chemoreflex activation by KCN in unanesthetized rats produces a marked increase in peripheral resistance. As we demonstrated before, this response is mediated by a direct sympathetic activation by the chemoreflex.5 The dominance of the sympathetic influence on the vascular responses to chemoreflex activation evoked by KCN in unanesthetized rats may be related to at least four different factors. First, the less important modulation of the sympathetic activity by the hyperventilation-induced stretch receptors activation in the rat compared with dogs allows the full manifestation of the direct sympathetic activation by the chemoreceptor afferent fibers.3 4 9 Second, the absence of important direct vascular effects of KCN in the dose used and in the time frame in which the responses were observed in the present study (first 10 seconds). This contrasts with results obtained in unanesthetized animals10 subjected to systemic hypoxia. In this case, local influences dominate the vascular responses over the sympathetic activation by the hypoxia-induced chemoreflex. Third, chemoreflex and baroreflex can mutually interact. Experimental evidences obtained in various species showed that during simultaneous activation of both reflexes, the chemoreceptor afferent input may attenuate the baroreflex ability to modulate sympathetic activity.1 2 11 12 The inhibition of the baroreflex action during chemoreflex activation by KCN could enhance the sympathetic activity.12 Finally, chemoreflex activation by KCN in conscious rats evokes behavioral responses similar to those observed in the defense reaction.5 This could reinforce the increase in sympathetic activity both directly by primary sympathetic activation and indirectly by attenuating the buffering function of the baroreflex. In fact, the last one is a well known effect of the stimulation of the defense areas.2 12 This factor could not be investigated in the studies performed under anesthetics because they prevent afferent activation of the defense areas.
In summary, the present study demonstrated that the cardiovascular responses to chemoreflex stimulation by KCN are characterized by a simultaneous bradycardia and pressor response, decreased cardiac output, decreased stroke volume, and an increase in peripheral vascular resistance. The substantial decrease in cardiac output is related to combined bradycardia and the decrease in stroke volume. The stroke volume decreases seen during chemoreflex activation evoked by KCN are probably more related to the great increase in the cardiac afterload produced by the sudden increase in blood pressure. On the other hand, bradycardia is related to cardiac parasympathetic activation by the chemoreceptor afferent fibers. The great increase in vascular resistance in response to chemoreflex activated by KCN is probably related to multiple influences that lead to an increase in sympathetic activity. This includes direct activation by the peripheral chemoreceptors, activation of the defense areas, and inhibition of the baroreflex action. Moreover, in the rat, the lack of an important influence of the sympathetic inhibitory action of the pulmonary stretch reflex probably contributes to the full manifestation of the increased sympathetic activity during chemoreflex activation by KCN.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Marshall JM. Peripheral
chemoreceptors and cardiovascular regulation.
Physiol Rev. 1994;74:543-549.
3. Daly M de B, Scott MJ. The effects of the stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors on heart rate in the dog. J Physiol (Lond). 1958;144:148-166.
4. Daly M de B, Scott MJ. An analysis of the primary cardiovascular reflex effects of stimulation of the carotid body chemoreceptors in the dog. J Physiol (Lond). 1962;162:555-573.
5. Franchini KG, Krieger EM. Cardiovascular responses of conscious rats to carotid body chemoreceptor stimulation by intravenous KCN. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1993;42:63-70.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Marshall JM, Metcalfe JD.
Cardiovascular changes associated with augmented
breaths in normoxia and in hypoxia in the rat.
J Physiol (Lond). 1988;400:15-27.
7. Kuwahira I, Gonzalez NC, Heisler N, Pipper J.
Changes in regional blood flow distribution and oxygen supply during
hypoxia in conscious rats. J Appl
Physiol. 1993;74:211-214.
8. Marshall JM. Analysis of the
cardiovascular responses evoked following changes in
peripheral chemoreceptors activity in the rat.
J Physiol. 1984;326:495-513.
9. Walker BR, Brizzee BL.
Cardiovascular responses to hypoxia and
hypercapnia in barodenervated rats. J Appl
Physiol. 1990;68:678-686.
10. Franchini KG, Krieger EM. Carotid chemoreceptors
influence arterial pressure in intact and aortic denervated
rats. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:R677-R683.
11. Marshall JM. Interaction between the responses to stimulation of peripheral chemoreceptors and baroreceptors: the importance of chemoreceptor activation of the defence areas. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1981;3:389-400.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Trzebski A, Lipski J, Majcherczyk S, Szulczyk P, Chruscielewski L. Central organisation and interaction of the carotid baroreceptor and chemoreceptor sympathetic reflex. Brain Res. 1975;87:227-237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. F. Hayward and M. Von Reitzenstein c-Fos expression in the midbrain periaqueductal gray after chemoreceptor and baroreceptor activation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): H1975 - H1984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |