(Hypertension. 1997;30:886-896.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From Prassis-Sigma Tau, Research Institute, Milan (M.F., P.F.), the Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Milan and S. Raffaele Hospital (P.M., G.B.), Milan, and the CNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa (S.B.), Italy; and the Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore (J.M.H.).
Correspondence to Dr P. Ferrari, Prassis Istituto Ricerche Sigma-Tau, Via Forlanini 3, 20019 Settimo Milanese, Milano, Italy. E-mail mc3405{at}mclink.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: ouabain Na+,K+-ATPase rats human tissue plasma
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess the role of OLF in physiological and pathological conditions, a reliable method must be developed for its measurement, both in tissues and plasma. To avoid problems caused by the heterogeneity of human plasma samples and because of the possibility of contamination by exogenous ouabain, we used tissues and plasma from an animal model. The MHS and MNS rats are particularly suitable for these studies because they are reared under strictly controlled environmental and dietary conditions.16 Also, previous studies have demonstrated that the hypothalamic OLF content is 5 to 10 times greater in MHS than in MNS17 and that these levels are not influenced by exogenous sources.18 By comparing two independent assays in a single studyRIA, which uses a specific polyclonal antiouabain antiserum14 and a radioenzymatic assay based on inhibition of purified dog kidney Na+,K+-ATPase17 we demonstrated that the two methodologies produce comparable results when applied to extracts obtained either before or after HPLC fractionation. Both assays were conducted on tissue and plasma extracts from adult MHS and MNS rats. Analyses of OLF from plasma of both Milan rats and healthy human volunteers were also performed to define the optimal experimental conditions that would provide reliable data about OLF plasma levels in humans.
The results demonstrate that, if appropriate and controlled extraction procedures are applied, OLF is always detectable in rat tissues and in both rat and human plasma, even after HPLC fractionation. The RIA and radioenzymatic assay quantified OLF similarly, both before and after HPLC fractionation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Indirect systolic blood pressure was measured by tail-cuff plethysmography on a W+W BP recorder (Basile) and averaged 170±1.5 and 132±1 mm Hg for MHS and MNS, respectively. The rats were decapitated with a hand guillotine.
All animals were maintained and treated in accordance with the European Community Directive 8/609/CEE of 24-11-1986 and the Italian Law DL n.116 of 27-1-1992. Strain and substrain symbols given in the text are in agreement with the Standardized Nomenclature of Inbred Laboratory Animals (Festing & Staats).
Tissues and Plasma
A total of 150 rats of both strains were killed; the following
tissues were removed, pooled, and weighed: hypothalamus (22 to 25
g), hypophysis (1 to 1.5 g), and adrenals (4 to 5 g) for each
strain. Tissues were stored at -20°C until use.
Arterial blood obtained from either decapitated or chronically cannulated MHS and MNS rats was collected in chilled, heparinized tubes and immediately centrifuged at 1500g for 10 minutes at 4°C. Plasma was separated and stored at -20°C until use. Venous blood samples from healthy normotensive human volunteers were treated in the same manner.
OLF Extraction and HPLC Fractionation Procedures
OLF was extracted from freshly thawed tissues following a
previously described procedure.17 Tissues were
homogenized with methanol (tissue/methanol, 1:10
[wt/vol]) that contained 2 mmol/L ascorbic acid and then
stirred overnight at 4°C. The homogenate was
centrifuged at 1500g for 30 minutes to pellet all
the insoluble material. The supernatants were dried under vacuum,
reconstituted in 0.1% distilled TFA acid (tissue/TFA, 1:5 [wt/vol]),
and centrifuged at 3000g for 30 minutes at 4°C to
discard the precipitated material. Different amounts of plasma were
extracted for further purification and quantification as follows: 2 or
10 mL for pre-HPLC measurements and 40 mL for HPLC fractionation.
Plasma samples were extracted either with methanol (plasma/methanol,
1:5 [vol/vol]), as in the procedure described for rat tissues,
or directly mixed with 0.1% TFA (plasma/TFA,1:1 [vol/vol])
and centrifuged at 3000g for 30 minutes at 4°C.
Supernatants from tissue and plasma extracts were passed by vacuum over
prewashed C18 Mega Bond Elut columns (Varian). Several washes with
water and one wash with 2.5% acetonitrile were performed to separate
unbound material from compounds with less polarity. OLF was then eluted
by the column with 25% acetonitrile, and the eluate was dried under
vacuum. For pre-HPLC determinations, the dry residues from 2- or 10-mL
plasma extracts were reconstituted with 200 µL bidistilled water and
measured immediately by RIA or ATPase assay. For HPLC fractionation,
plasma (40 mL), dry tissue extracts, or standard ouabain was dissolved
in 500 µL bidistilled water and further chromatographed by
injection onto a semipreparative reversed-phase PEP S C2/C18
high-performance column (Pharmacia, 39x250 mm, 4-µm
particle size). A two-step linear acidified (0.05% distilled TFA)
acetonitrile-to-water gradient was developed in 75 minutes at a
1-mL/min flow rate in accordance with the following gradient
conditions: equilibration over 5 minutes in water, from 0% to 10%
acetonitrile over 5 minutes; from 10% to 20% acetonitrile over 40
minutes; from 20% to 90% acetonitrile over 15 minutes; and from 90%
to 0% acetonitrile over 10 minutes. One-minute fractions were
collected, dried under vacuum, and assayed for the presence of OLF.
HPLC was run in a Hitachi-Merck system controller (L6200A), and
absorbance at 214 nm was recorded in parallel (L4000 UV detector).
Blank runs were carried out with water and controlled immediately
before sample injection.
Pre-HPLC Extraction and Exogenous Ouabain Recovery
Buffer and MNS rat plasma were spiked with concentrations of
ouabain that increased from 125 to 500 pmol/L. These
concentrations were chosen to span the
physiological range of OLF concentrations, which is
between 0.05 and 0.75 nmol/L (see "Results"). Buffer and
plasma samples then were extracted with methanol and passed through a
C18 cartridge as described previously. The basal plasma OLF
concentration and the exogenous ouabain recovery were quantified by
RIA.
OLF Quantification Methods
RIA
OLF or standard ouabain was measured by RIA as previously
described.15 Tissue sample (25 µL) or commercial ouabain
(Sigma) was incubated at room temperature for 15 hours with 25 µL
[3H]ouabain (30 to 40 Ci/mmol, Amersham; 2 nmol/L
final concentration, diluted in PBS containing 50 mmol/L
sodium phosphate and 1% bovine albumin; pH 7.4) and 100 µL
of a rabbit polyclonal antiouabain antiserum (R7) (1:20 000 final
dilution in PBS), kindly provided by J.M. Hamlyn.14 In
some experiments, the R7 antiserum was compared with another rabbit
polyclonal antiouabain antiserum (SG), which was recently
characterized19 and kindly provided by Dr S. Ghione (CNR
Inst Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy). A goat anti-rabbit
-globulin
solution (1:800 final dilution in PBS) was added to be complexed with
ouabain and ouabain antiserum. The incubation was stopped by the
addition of 4 mL stop solution (5 mmol/L EDTA, 50
mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.4) at room temperature; the
separation of bound from free-labeled ouabain was achieved by the rapid
filtration technique on Whatman GF/F glass fiber filters applied to a
Brandel Cell Harvester apparatus (Biomedical Research and
Development Laboratories). The filters were washed three times with a
4-mL stop solution and counted for radioactivity in a ß counter
(Beckman, LS 5000 CE) after the addition of 4 mL scintillation liquid
(Filter Count, Beckman).
The R7 antiserum was characterized previously for its sensitivity and specificity.14 The immunocross-reactivity of R7 antiserum was 100% ouabain, 21% ouabagenin, 22% strophantidin-K, 9% digitoxin, 0.4% digoxin, 0.36% bufalin, <0.01% cinobufotalin and cinobufagin, 0.9% aldosterone, 0.05% ß-estradiol, 0.012% progesterone, and not detectable for fatty acids. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the threshold sensitivity of the R7 antiserum was approximately 0.02 nmol/L, and the estimated 50% displacement dose occurs at 2 to 3 nmol/L in typical ouabain dilution curves.14 The immunocross-reactivity of the SG antiserum was 100% ouabain, 34% ouabagenin, 32% strophantidin-K, 1.2% digitoxin, 1.2% digoxin, 2.7% bufalin, <0.01% cinobufotalin and cinobufagin, and not detectable for aldosterone, ß-estradiol, progesterone, and fatty acids.
OLF levels in rat tissues and plasma extracts were calculated as percent displacement of the control sample, which was carried out in the absence of ouabain and OLF. The OLF concentration was expressed in nmol/L ouabain equivalents derived from the ouabain standard curve. With a molecular weight of 500 Da7 20 assumed for OLF, the tissue OLF content was calculated as nanograms per gram of wet weight. The intra- and interassay coefficient of variation was approximately 7% to 10%.
Radioenzymatic Assay (Na+,K+-ATPase
Inhibition)
Renal Na+,K+-ATPase, from dog kidney
outer medulla, was used to measure the ouabain and OLF
inhibitory activity. Na+,K+-ATPase
was purified as described by the Jorgensen procedure,21
and the protein concentration was estimated by the Lowry method, using
bovine albumin as the standard.22
Na+,K+-ATPase activity was assayed by the
32Pi-ATP hydrolysis method as previously
described.16
Aliquots of rat tissues and plasma extracts or standard ouabain and OLF, purified by HPLC from rat hypothalamus, were dried under vacuum and resuspended in 50-µL final volume of preincubation medium (140 mmol/L NaCl, 3 mmol/L MgCl2, 50 mmol/L Hepes-Tris, 3 mmol/L ATP, pH 7.5) that contained 0.3 µg of purified Na+,K+-ATPase and preincubated for 45 minutes at 37°C. Incubation solution (10 µL; 10 mmol/L KCl, 20 nCi 32Pi-ATP, Amersham, 0.5 to 3 Ci/mmol) was then added, and the reaction was allowed to continue for 15 minutes at 37°C. The reaction was stopped, and the free 32Pi was separated from the bound 32Pi by the addition of 100 µL cold perchloric acid (30%, vol/vol) and 500 µL activated charcoal. Free 32Pi was separated by centrifugation, and the radioactivity in the supernatant was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Beckman LS 5000 CE) after the addition of 4 mL scintillation fluid (Instagel, Beckman). Under standardized conditions, the purified Na+,K+-ATPase activity from dog kidney was 99% ouabain inhibitable, and the specific activity ranged from 15 to 18 µmol · min-1 · mg-1 protein. OLF inhibitory activity was calculated as percent inhibition of the control sample and carried out in the absence of ouabain. OLF was expressed in units; one unit of OLF was defined as the amount of the sample that inhibited the Na+,K+-ATPase activity by 50%. From previously published data,16 the apparent molar concentration for 1 unit of OLF was estimated to be equivalent to 14 nmol/L. With a molecular weight of 50020 assumed for OLF, the tissue OLF content was expressed as nanograms per gram of wet weight.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Standard Ouabain and OLF Dilution Curves: Comparison of Two
Different Antiouabain Polyclonal Antisera in the RIA Assay
Many of the discrepancies that concern OLF detectability and its
concentration in plasma samples have been attributed to differences in
the specificity of the antiouabain antisera used for RIA or ELISA. We
compared two rabbit polyclonal antisera, R7 and SG, raised in two
different laboratories, against plant ouabain, and already
characterized.14 19 Fig 2
shows the titration curves of the two antisera compared with ouabain
and OLF purified from rat hypothalamus.17 Both antisera
recognized with similar affinities both ouabain
(Kd, 3.3±0.4 nmol/L) and OLF
(Kd, 2.6±0.23 nmol/L) and similarly
quantified an HPLC sample of human plasma (R7, 77 pmol/L; SG, 68
pmol/L).
|
HPLC Analysis of Standard Ouabain and Rat Tissue
Extracts
To detect the HPLC elution profile of standard ouabain, 100 nmol
of ouabain (500 µL) was injected into the C2/C18 HPLC column, and a
gradient was developed as described in "Methods." One-minute
fractions were collected and assayed in parallel in RIA and ATPase
tests. Blank injections were run before each HPLC sample injection and
assayed in both tests. As shown in Fig 3A
, the HPLC elution profiles of standard
ouabain obtained were the same in the two assays, both of which
identified a single fraction containing ouabain with a retention time
(t) of 21 minutes, corresponding to 15% acetonitrile. Also, in both
assays the ouabain recovery determined in the HPLC active fraction
accounted for 95% of the total injected ouabain. The parallel
ultraviolet absorbance, recorded at 214 nm, identified a
single fraction with t=21' (not shown). As with "cold" ouabain, a
similar elution profile (active fraction at t=21') and recovery (90%
to 95% of the total radioactivity injected) were also obtained when
[3H]ouabain traces (Amersham, 35 Ci/mmol, 10 pmoles) were
run on the same HPLC system (data not shown, 16).
|
Rat tissue extracts from C18 Bond Elut columns were run on the semipreparative reversed-phase C2/C18 column under elution conditions similar to those described for standard ouabain. The HPLC fractions were assayed in parallel in RIA and ATPase assay. Blanks were run immediately before each sample injection and were assayed with both tests.
Fig 3
shows the HPLC elution profiles of rat tissue extracts from MHS
and MNS hypothalamus (Fig 3B
), hypophysis (Fig 3C
), and adrenals (Fig 3D
). The figure shows that both RIA and ATPase identified the same
active fraction, with a retention time identical to that of ouabain
(t=21'), in all MHS and MNS tissue extracts. The HPLC elution profile
of MHS and MNS adrenal extracts (Fig 3D
) showed, in addition to a
fraction at t=21', the presence of fractions that have minor polarity
and retention times of approximately 35 to 45 minutes, as assayed by
RIA. These fractions were not recognized by the ATPase assay. This
result confirms similar previously reported findings,4 23
which concern the presence of less-polar fractions in adrenal extracts
that contain some nonspecific material that is able to cross-react with
the ouabain antibody but not to bind and inhibit the
Na+,K+-ATPase. The nature of this material has
not been further investigated.
Table 1
summarizes OLF yields in MHS and
MNS tissue extracts quantified by RIA and ATPase assay after HPLC
fractionation (fraction at t=21'). The results indicate that rat
tissues contained variable amounts of OLF, which were quantified
similarly by the two methods. In particular, MHS showed in both
hypothalamus and hypophysis 8- to 10- and 3- to 5-fold higher OLF
yields, respectively, than MNS. On the contrary, no difference between
MHS and MNS was detected in adrenal OLF content by either method.
|
HPLC Analysis of Rat and Human Plasma
Methanol extracts of plasma from MHS and MNS rats and three
normotensive volunteers were run on HPLC with gradient conditions
similar to those described for rat tissue extracts. Fig 4
shows one
representative HPLC plasma elution profile from MHS and
MNS rats (Fig 4A
) and one from humans (Fig 4B
). These profiles were
identical, both with the RIA and ATPase assay, showing a specific peak
of elution at t=21', which is similar to that observed for standard
ouabain (Fig 3A
) or rat tissue extracts (Fig 3B
, C, D). No other active
fractions were detected in either rat or human plasma with either assay
method.
|
A second extraction procedure that consisted of a 0.1% TFA
pretreatment followed by HPLC was investigated in which rat and human
plasma were used (Fig 4C
and 4D
). Under these experimental conditions,
HPLC elution profiles were similar to those obtained with methanol
pre-extraction (Fig 4A
and 4B
). As before, both RIA and ATPase assay
identified only one specific active fraction at t=21' in all the plasma
extracts. Therefore, the present results show that OLF is eluted in
a single, specific, active fraction, both in rat and human plasma.
Plasma OLF concentrations in HPLC-active fractions were
analyzed as a function of the pre-HPLC extraction procedures.
As shown in Table 2
, the RIA and ATPase
assay both quantified similar OLF concentrations in either rat or human
plasma extracts. However, methanol extraction of MHS, MNS, and human
plasma resulted in higher OLF concentrations than those found by the
0.1% TFA treatment (Table 2
). This result could be attributed to the
higher density of the sample treated with TFA compared with that
extracted with methanol. Therefore, a partial obstruction of the HPLC
column may affect OLF recovery after HPLC. Notwithstanding this effect
of TFA, the concordance between the RIA and ATPase assay for OLF
quantification was verified by a linear regression analysis
that showed a highly significant correlation coefficient between the
two assays, both for OLF levels from rat tissues (Fig 5A
;
r=.89, n=10, P<.001) and from rat and human
plasma (Fig 5B
; r=.98, n=9, P<.001). Independent
of the pre-HPLC extraction procedures, both with RIA and ATPase assay,
plasma OLF concentration in MHS was approximately 2.8- to 3.8-fold
higher than in MNS (Table 2
).
|
|
OLF Concentrations in Rat Tissues and Plasma Before
HPLC
Table 3
summarizes OLF yield from
rat tissues measured by RIA in pre-HPLC extracts. The table shows that
the amounts of OLF quantified before HPLC from hypothalamus and
hypophysis in MHS were, respectively, approximately 7.5- and 3.5-fold
higher than in MNS, which confirms the results shown previously on HPLC
extracts (Table 1
). No differences were observed between the two
strains for pre-HPLC adrenal extracts, as previously shown after HPLC
(Table 1
). Moreover, it is very likely that the quantification of OLF
in pre-HPLC adrenal extracts was overestimated because of the presence
of nonspecific immunocross-reacting material demonstrated by the
adrenal HPLC profile (Fig 3D
).
|
The recovery of exogenous ouabain, added either to 2 mL buffer or rat
plasma and measured by RIA after the methanol pre-HPLC extraction
procedure, is shown in Table 4
. It can be
seen that ouabain added to the buffer samples was recovered on the
average by 124% and that added to plasma by 87%.
|
MHS and MNS plasma-OLF concentrations were then quantified by RIA in pre-HPLC extracts to verify whether the difference observed in HPLC extracts between the two strains was maintained in this condition and whether it was influenced by the blood-sampling maneuver.
Pre-HPLC plasma-OLF concentrations, measured in trunk blood after
methanol extraction, were 2-fold higher in MHS (0.565±0.06
nmol/L, n=17) than in MNS (0.284±0.05 nmol/L, n=15,
P<.01), and similar results were obtained in samples
withdrawn from chronically cannulated rats (MHS, 0.535±0.1
nmol/L; n=7; MNS, 0.225±0.05 nmol/L; n=6;
P<.05). Therefore, similar differences in plasma-OLF
concentrations were detectable between the two rat strains, both before
and after HPLC fractionation (Table 2
), and are not affected by the
sampling maneuver.
To verify if a sample pretreatment, different from methanol extraction, may influence the plasma-OLF quantification before HPLC, the same rat plasma sample was either extracted with methanol or pretreated with 0.1% TFA and assayed by RIA. The results showed that plasma-OLF was similarly quantified after either methanol (MHS, 0.338 nmol/L; MNS, 0.197 nmol/L) or TFA (MHS, 0.320 nmol/L; MNS, 0.198 nmol/L) pretreatment. Therefore, when plasma-OLF concentrations are assayed in pre-HPLC extracts by RIA, either methanol or TFA pretreatment can be used indifferently.
OLF Quantification in Human Plasma Pre-HPLC Extracts
To allow the quantification of OLF concentrations in plasma
samples, with HPLC fractionation avoided, two conditions must be met:
only one active fraction may be present in plasma extracts after
HPLC fractionation, and thus the possibility of quantifying nonspecific
cross-reacting material in pre-HPLC samples is excluded; quantitative
differences between plasma samples (ie, between MHS and MNS rats) are
maintained both before and after HPLC fractionation. In the current
study, both of these conditions were met; therefore, we quantified OLF
concentrations in pre-HPLC human plasma by comparing the RIA and ATPase
assay. After methanol extraction, similar OLF concentrations were
detected, both with RIA (309±19 pmol/L, n=20) and ATPase assay
(349±18 pmol/L, n=12). On the contrary, TFA treatment resulted
in a difference in quantification by RIA (354±29 pmol/L, n=12)
and ATPase assay (115±9.6 pmol/L, n=5). The lower OLF
concentrations, observed when samples were treated with TFA and
quantified by ATPase compared with RIA, are probably caused by the
different amounts of plasma needed to perform these two assays: 2 mL
for RIA and 10 mL for ATPase assay, which are extracted volume to
volume, dried, and reconstituted in 200 µL. The final density of the
sample treated with TFA and assayed by the ATPase method was higher
than that assayed by RIA; this may therefore affect the ability of OLF
to interact with the Na+,K+-ATPase
receptor.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To resolve the problem of detectability and reliability of OLF measurements, we have measured this factor both in tissues and plasma of MHS and MNS rats, maintained under strictly controlled environmental and dietary conditions, by applying both ouabain RIA and Na+,K+-ATPase inhibition assay. By these methods, OLF has also been detected in human plasma samples, provided that, with appropriate preextraction procedures followed by HPLC, only one active fraction, which coelutes with plant ouabain, contains OLF.
First, we have verified that the two assays, RIA and ATPase, were
able to quantify plant ouabain in the same way. The two dose-response
curves obtained with RIA and ATPase assay are parallel and
superimposable (Fig 1
), with a difference shown only in the calculated
Kds, which was caused by the expected different
affinities of the antiserum for ouabain (Kd, 3.4
nmol/L) and Na+,K+-ATPase
(IC50, 14 nmol/L). When a sample of purified OLF
from rat hypothalamus17 is processed in parallel with
ouabain, the two substances are indistinguishable and show identical
dose-response curves in both assays. These results show that ouabain
and purified OLF are recognized and equally quantified by two tests,
each of which is based on different biological criteria. Because OLF
can inhibit Na+,K+-ATPase and cross-react with
antiouabain antisera, it behaves as plant ouabain, even though it may
be structurally different. The lower detection limit of RIA with the R7
antiserum is 0.07 nmol/L and that of the ATPase assay is 3 nmol/L. This
suggests that to obtain reliable measurements of OLF levels with the
ATPase assay, at least 5 to 10 times more tissue or plasma must be
processed compared with the RIA.
The heterogeneity of the antisera used in
different laboratories may be responsible for the variability of
results reported for OLF quantification. In our work, we compared two
rabbit polyclonal antiouabain antisera (raised by different
laboratories [J. Hamlyn's laboratory, R7; S. Ghione's laboratory,
SG]) that possessed very similar panels of cross reactivity with
digitalis or steroidal molecules and showed that both of these antisera
recognized (in addition to ouabain) two aglycones structurally related
to ouabain, such as ouabagenin and strophantidin-K. With the use of
these antisera in an RIA assay, we obtained completely superimposable
ouabain and OLF titration curves (Fig 2
). Moreover, OLF concentration
in a sample of human plasma, previously fractionated on HPLC, was
quantified similarly by both antisera. This may indicate that antisera
able to recognize ouabain and related aglycones are probably suitable
for the recognition of the endogenous OLF, which is likely
a close isomer of ouabain7 and whose isometry has been
suggested recently to be more linked to one of the hydroxyl groups on
the steroidal ring than to a different position of the sugar
substitution.33 The possibility that the antisera used in
the current study can recognize an endogenous
inhibitor of Na+,K+-ATPase,
structurally different from cardenolides and closer to
bufodienolides,26 cannot be excluded completely, even
though this seems unlikely because the two antisera show very weak
cross reactivity with bufodienolides.
The extraction and HPLC-fractionation procedures and then the use of
ELISA, instead of RIA, may also introduce other important factors of
variability. In an effort to standardize these procedures, we
analyzed each part of the entire procedure. With our
experimental conditions (see "Methods"), approximately 100% of
plant ouabain is recovered after HPLC fractionation. Only a single
fraction that contains ouabain, which elutes at 15% acetonitrile with
a retention time of 21 minutes, is equally recognized by the two assays
(Fig 3A
). By this procedure, OLF from hypothalamus, hypophysis, and
adrenals of MHS and MNS rats was quantified. These tissues were chosen
because previous reports have demonstrated that they may be sites for
OLF production15 17 20 34 and that MHS
hypothalamus contains a higher amount of OLF than that of
MNS.17 We have demonstrated that for all of these tissues
a specific HPLC fraction, identical to that of ouabain, is similarly
recognized as containing OLF by both RIA and ATPase methods (Fig 3B
through 3D). Of more interest, however, is the observation that adrenal
extracts, with the exception of the 21-minute active fraction, contain
other material (with higher retention time) able to cross-react with
the antiouabain antisera but unable to inhibit
Na+,K+-ATPase. Considerable controversy has
been raised about the origin of the endogenous ouabain in
adrenals.23 35 Hamlyn's group34 36
demonstrated that adrenals are the most highly enriched tissue source
of endogenous ouabain. Doris et al,23 however,
found a very diffused pattern of ouabain cross reactivity in
conditioned medium from adrenal cells in culture, which suggests that
even if adrenals contain and secrete ouabain, the levels are too low to
play any physiological role in
vivo.13 23 Because our data confirm that very low amounts
of OLF and some nonspecific material, only detectable by RIA, is
contained in adrenals, it would seem that very stringent methodological
criteria, such as HPLC fractionation and double assay measurements,
must be conducted to quantify OLF properly from this tissue. Moreover,
by applying these criteria, no difference in adrenal OLF content was
observed between MHS and MNS rats. On the contrary, hypothalamic and
hypophyseal tissues are more enriched with OLF, whose levels are,
respectively, nine and four times higher in MHS than in MNS. These data
agree with those already published by our group17 and
those obtained in other hypertensive rat strains, such as spontaneously
hypertensive rats37 and Dahl rats.38
One of the most debated issues concerns OLF detectability in plasma. We
have shown that, with both methanol extraction and TFA treatment, HPLC
fractionation of human and rat plasma results in a single active
fraction, which is indistinguishable from that revealed when standard
ouabain is eluted, and that it contains material that is similarly
detected by RIA and ATPase assay (Fig 4
). The amount of OLF quantified
in this HPLC fraction depends on the preextraction procedure, being
lower with TFA than with methanol (Table 2
). The reason for this
difference may be linked to a "matrix" effect caused by the high
density of the samples treated with TFA, which may cause an obstruction
of the HPLC column. The possibility that a 0.1% TFA treatment can
destroy OLF is unlikely because we showed that in pre-HPLC samples
methanol extraction and TFA treatment give a similar quantification of
OLF when measured by RIA. Moreover, we have already demonstrated that
only extensive acid hydrolysis, with 6N HCl at 110°C for 2 hours,
partially inactivates OLF, which is also not sensitive to
10% TCA treatment.17
The OLF concentrations we found in rat and human plasma after HPLC
fractionation ranged from 25 to 100 pmol/L (Table 2
). These
values are in agreement with those reported by other authors who used
HPLC followed by RIA or ELISA.10 29 34 However, Lewis et
al9 were unable to detect "endogenous
ouabain" in HPLC-fractionated human plasma by ELISA that used an
antiouabain antiserum. These authors observed only an immunoreactive
fraction that contained a less-polar material than ouabain, which was
not further characterized. There are several explanations for these
discrepancies. First, Lewis's antiouabain antiserum, as opposed to the
two used in the current study, may not recognize OLF, even if the
immunocross-reactivity profiles toward ouabain and related aglycones
are very similar for all three. Second, different preextraction
procedures may be involved. In the Lewis study, two different
extraction methods were used: in the first, only 1 mL of plasma was
passed through the C18 cartridge, eluted with 25% acetonitrile/0.1%
TFA, dried, reconstituted, and applied to an HPLC column. The small
plasma sample used may result in a low recovery of OLF, which is under
the detection limit of the assay. In the second method, methanol was
used as in our study,9 but contrary to our procedure, the
methanol extract (from 20 mL of plasma) analyzed by Lewis et al
was either allowed to pass through the C18 cartridge without the
application of a vacuum or was simply precipitated, thus avoiding the
cartridge passage. These two procedures may not extract sufficient
ouabain-like material from the plasma matrix. Furthermore, we have
shown that, provided the extraction procedures are well standardized,
it is possible to detect OLF in both mammalian tissues and plasma
samples by the use of the ATPase method alone, independent of the
antibody used.
A practical result of this study was to standardize a method to
quantify OLF in small samples of rat plasma without HPLC fractionation.
This objective has been pursued after two criteria were verified as
having been met: first, that under our experimental conditions, no
other fractions except that which contained OLF were eluted in HPLC
both from rat and human plasma; and second, that similar quantitative
differences between MHS and MNS plasma samples are maintained both
before and after HPCL fractionation. Plasma samples, spiked with
exogenous ouabain at concentrations that span the
physiological OLF range, showed after methanol
extraction and C18 elution (Table 4
) a good recovery with a small
degree of loss, probably caused by the binding of ouabain to plasma
proteins. When plasma is extracted with methanol, OLF is similarly
quantified by both RIA and ATPase assay in a range of concentrations
between 0.05 and 0.7 nmol/L, both for rats and healthy humans.
Therefore, the simple procedure described in this article, which
utilizes small amounts of plasma (2 mL) and avoids the HPLC step, can
be adopted for quantifying OLF in rats under different experimental,
pharmacological, and physiopathological conditions. Preliminary data
presented here on OLF quantification in pre-HPLC plasma from
healthy human volunteers are in agreement with those obtained in rats.
However, to validate this procedure for the measurement of OLF in the
population at large, further studies should involve a sufficient number
of patients suffering from different pathological conditions.
In conclusion, present findings demonstrate that an endogenous inhibitor of the Na+,K+ pump, recognized by antiouabain antisera, is detectable even after HPLC fractionation in mammalian tissues and plasma at picomolar concentrations. Two different assays, based on immune cross-reactivity (RIA) or enzyme inhibition (ATPase), quantify OLF similarly, provided that appropriate extraction procedures are applied. We suggest that all laboratories interested in OLF quantification should make uniform their experimental protocols and antisera and exchange samples to set up a unique standardized procedure, which could lead to the clarification of the functional role of OLF in various physiological and pathological conditions.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received February 25, 1997; first decision March 5, 1997; accepted March 5, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Blaustein MP. Sodium ions, calcium ions, and
blood pressure regulation: a reassessment and a hypothesis.
Am J Physiol. 1977;232:C165-C173.
3. de Wardener HE, MacGregor GA. Dahl's hypothesis that a saluretic substance may be responsible for a sustained rise in arterial pressure: its possible role in essential hypertension. Kidney Int. 1980;18:1-9.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Hamlyn JM, Blaustein MP, Bova S, DuCharme DW, Harris
DW, Mandel F, Mathews W, Ludens J. Identification and
characterization of a ouabain-like compound from human plasma.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:6259-6263.
5. Hamlyn JM, Ringel R, Schaffer J, Levinson PD, Hamilton BP, Kowarski AA, Blaustein MP. A circulating inhibitor of the Na-K ATPase associated with essential hypertension. Nature Lond. 1982;300:650-652.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Mathews WR, DuCharme DW, Hamlyn JM, Harris DW, Mandel
F, Clark MA, Ludens JH. Mass spectral characterization of an
endogenous digitalis-like factor from human plasma.
Hypertension. 1991;17:930-935.
7.
Tymiak AA, Norman JA, Bolgar M, Di Donato GC,
Lee H, Parker WL, Lo LC, Berova N, Nakanishi K, Haber E, Haupert
GT. Physicochemical characterization of a ouabain isomer
isolated from bovine hypothalamus. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1993;90:8189-8193.
8. Zhao N, Lo LC, Berova N, Nakanishi K, Tymiak A, Ludens JH, Haupert GT. Na-K ATPase inhibitors from bovine hypothalamus and human plasma are different from ouabain: nanogram scale CD structural analysis. Biochemistry. 1995;34:9893-9896.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Lewis LK, Yandle TG, Lewis JG, Richards AM, Pidgeon
GB, Kaaja RJ, Nicholls MG. Ouabain is not detectable in human
plasma. Hypertension. 1994;24:549-555.
10. Gomez-Sanchez EP, Foecking MF, Sellers D, Blankenship MS, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Is the circulating ouabain-like compound ouabain? Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:647-650.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Kelly RA, Smith TW. Is ouabain the
endogenous digitalis? Circulation. 1992;86:694-697.
12. Nicholls MG, Richards AM, Lewis LK, Yandle TG. Ouabain: a new steroid hormone? Lancet. 1995;346:1381-1382.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Hansen O. Do putative endogenous
digitalis-like factors have a physiological
role? Hypertension. 1994;24:640-642.
14.
Harris DW, Clark MA, Fisher JF, Hamlyn JM, Kolbasa KP,
Ludens JH, Du Charme DW. Development of an immunoassay for
endogenous digitalis-like factor.
Hypertension. 1991;17:936-943.
15. Manunta P, Rogowski AC, Hamilton BP, Hamlyn JM. Ouabain-induced hypertension in the rat: relationships among plasma and tissue ouabain and blood pressure. J Hypertens. 1994;12:549-560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Barber BR, Ferrari P, Bianchi G. The Milan hypertensive strain: a description of the model. In: Ganten D, de Jong W, eds. Handbook of Hypertension. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 1994:316-345.
17.
Ferrandi M, Minotti E, Salardi S, Florio M, Bianchi G,
Ferrari P. Ouabainlike factor in Milan hypertensive
rats. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:F739-F748.
18. Ferrandi M, Minotti E, Florio M, Bianchi G, Ferrari P. Age-dependency and dietary influence on the hypothalamic ouabain-like factor in Milan hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1571-1574.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Di Bartolo V, Balzan S, Pieraccini L, Ghione S, Pegoraro S, Biver P, Revoltella R, Montali U. Evidence for an endogenous ouabain-like immunoreactive factor in human newborn plasma coeluted with ouabain on HPLC. Life Sci. 1995;57:1417-1425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Haupert GT, Carilli CT, Cantley LC. Hypothalamic sodium transport inhibitor is a high affinity reversible inhibitor of Na-K ATPase. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:F919-F924.
21. Jorgensen PL. Purification and characterization of the Na-K ATPase from outer medulla of mammalian kidney. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1974;356:36-52.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ.
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J
Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275.
23.
Doris PA, Jenkins LA, Stocco DM. Is
ouabain an authentic endog- enous mammalian substance derived
from the adrenal? Hypertension.. 1994;23:632-638.
24.
Bova S, Blaustein MP, Ludens JH, Harris DW, DuCharme
DW, Hamlyn JM. Effects of an endogenous ouabainlike
compound on heart and aorta. Hypertension. 1991;17:944-950.
25.
Leenen FH, Harmse E, Yu H, Ou C. Effects of
dietary sodium on central and peripheral ouabainlike
activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J
Physiol. 1993;264:H2051-H2055.
26. Bagrov AY, Dmitrieva RI, Fedorova OV, Kazakov GP, Roukoyatkina NI, Shpen VM. Endogenous marinobufagenin-like immunoreactive substance: a possible endogenous Na,K-ATPase inhibitor with vasoconstrictor activity. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:982-990.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Doris PA. Ouabain in plasma from spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1994;266(Heart Circ Physiol 35):H360-H364.
28. Hout SJ, Pamnani MB, Clough DL, Buggy J, Bryant HJ, Harder DR, Haddy FJ. Sodium-potassium pump activity in reduced renal mass hypertension. Hypertension. 1983;5(part 2):I-94-I-100.
29. Worgall S, Hänze J, Wagner R, Peiser C, Lang RE, Sulyok E, Rascher W. Characterization of ouabain-like immunoreactivity in human urine. J Hypertens. 1996;14:623-628.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Rossi GP, Manunta P, Hamlyn JM, Pavan E, De Toni R, Semplicini A, Pessina AC. Immunoreactive endogenous ouabain in primary aldosteronism and essential hypertension: relationship with plasma renin, aldosterone and blood pressure levels. J Hypertens. 1995;13:1181-1191.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Goto A, Yamada K, Hazama H, Uehara Y, Atarashi K,
Hirata Y, Kimura K, Omata M. Ouabainlike compound in
hypertension associated with ectopic corticotropin syndrome.
Hypertension. 1996;28:421-425.
32.
Bagrov A, Fedorova O, Roukoyatkina N, Zhabko E.
Effect of endogenous digoxin-like factor and digoxin
antibody on myocardial Na-K pump activity and ventricular
arrhythmias in acute myocardial ischaemia in rats.
Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1045-1050.
33. Dong JG, Akritopoulou-Zanze I, Guo J, Berova N, Nakanishi K, Hauper GT. Cd theorical studies on ouabain pentanaphthoate analogs. In: Beaugé LA, Garrahan PJ, Gadsby DC, eds. Proceedings of the VIIIth International Conference on the Na/K-ATPase and Related Transport ATPases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. In press.
34. Hamilton BP, Manunta P, Laredo J, Hamilton JH, Hamlyn JM. The new adrenal steroid hormone ouabain. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1994:123-131.
35. Naruse K, Naruse M, Tanabe A, Yoshimoto T, Watanabe Y, Kurimoto F, Horiba N, Tamura M, Inagami T, Demura H. Does plasma immunoreactive ouabain originate from the adrenal gland? Hypertension. 1994;23(suppl 1):I-102-I-105.
36. Laredo J, Hamilton BP, Hamlyn JM. Ouabain is secreted by bovine adrenocortical cells. Endocrinology. 1994;135:794-797.[Abstract]
37. Leenen FHH, Harmsen E, Yu H, Ou C. Effects of dietary sodium on central and peripheral ouabainlike activity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1993;264(Heart Circ Physiol 33):H2051-H2055.
38.
Leenen FHH, Harmsen E, Yu H. Dietary sodium and
central vs peripheral ouabain-like activity in Dahl
salt-sensitive vs salt resistant rats. Am J
Physiol. 1994;267:H1916-H1920.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Anderson, O. V. Fedorova, C. H. Morrell, D. L. Longo, V. A. Kashkin, J. D. Metzler, A. Y. Bagrov, and E. G. Lakatta Endogenous sodium pump inhibitors and age-associated increases in salt sensitivity of blood pressure in normotensives Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): R1248 - R1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Orlov and A. A. Mongin Salt-sensing mechanisms in blood pressure regulation and hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): H2039 - H2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Schoner and G. Scheiner-Bobis Endogenous and exogenous cardiac glycosides: their roles in hypertension, salt metabolism, and cell growth Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): C509 - C536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. V. Pitzalis, J. M. Hamlyn, E. Messaggio, M. Iacoviello, C. Forleo, R. Romito, E. de Tommasi, P. Rizzon, G. Bianchi, and P. Manunta Independent and incremental prognostic value of endogenous ouabain in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2006; 8(2): 179 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Blaustein, J. Zhang, L. Chen, and B. P. Hamilton How does salt retention raise blood pressure? Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R514 - R523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferrari, M. Ferrandi, G. Valentini, and G. Bianchi Rostafuroxin: an ouabain antagonist that corrects renal and vascular Na+-K+- ATPase alterations in ouabain and adducin-dependent hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R529 - R535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Manunta, B. P. Hamilton, and J. M. Hamlyn Salt intake and depletion increase circulating levels of endogenous ouabain in normal men Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2006; 290(3): R553 - R559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Murrell, J. D. Randall, J. Rosoff, J.-l. Zhao, R. V. Jensen, S. R. Gullans, and G. T. Haupert Jr Endogenous Ouabain: Upregulation of Steroidogenic Genes in Hypertensive Hypothalamus but Not Adrenal Circulation, August 30, 2005; 112(9): 1301 - 1308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ferrandi, I. Molinari, P. Barassi, E. Minotti, G. Bianchi, and P. Ferrari Organ Hypertrophic Signaling within Caveolae Membrane Subdomains Triggered by Ouabain and Antagonized by PST 2238 J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33306 - 33314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Echevarria-Lima, E. G. de Araujo, L. de Meis, and V. M. Rumjanek Ca2+ Mobilization Induced by Ouabain in Thymocytes Involves Intracellular and Extracellular Ca2+ Pools Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1386 - 1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H.G Schwinger, H. Bundgaard, J. Muller-Ehmsen, and K. Kjeldsen The Na, K-ATPase in the failing human heart Cardiovasc Res, March 15, 2003; 57(4): 913 - 920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Parhami-Seren, R. Haberly, M. N. Margolies, and G. T. Haupert Jr Ouabain-Binding Protein(s) From Human Plasma Hypertension, August 1, 2002; 40(2): 220 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Matthay, H. G. Folkesson, and C. Clerici Lung Epithelial Fluid Transport and the Resolution of Pulmonary Edema Physiol Rev, July 1, 2002; 82(3): 569 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Aizman, P. Uhlen, M. Lal, H. Brismar, and A. Aperia Ouabain, a steroid hormone that signals with slow calcium oscillations PNAS, October 25, 2001; (2001) 221315298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. De Wardener The Hypothalamus and Hypertension Physiol Rev, October 1, 2001; 81(4): 1599 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Aileru, A. De Albuquerque, J. M. Hamlyn, P. Manunta, J. R. Shah, M. J. Hamilton, and D. Weinreich Synaptic plasticity in sympathetic ganglia from acquired and inherited forms of ouabain-dependent hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): R635 - R644. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Manunta, E. Messaggio, C. Ballabeni, M. T. Sciarrone, C. Lanzani, M. Ferrandi, J. M. Hamlyn, D. Cusi, F. Galletti, and G. Bianchi Plasma Ouabain-Like Factor During Acute and Chronic Changes in Sodium Balance in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, August 1, 2001; 38(2): 198 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Balzan, D. Neglia, S. Ghione, G. D'Urso, M. C. Baldacchino, U. Montali, and A. L'Abbate Increased circulating levels of ouabain-like factor in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction Eur J Heart Fail, March 1, 2001; 3(2): 165 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Vakkuri, S. S. Arnason, P. Joensuu, J. Jalonen, O. Vuolteenaho, and J. Leppaluoto Radioiodinated Tyrosyl-Ouabain and Measurement of a Circulating Ouabain-like Compound Clin. Chem., January 1, 2001; 47(1): 95 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. A. M. Qazzaz, M. A. El-Masri, and R. Valdes Jr. Secretion of a Lactone-Hydrogenated Ouabain-Like Effector of Sodium, Potassium-Adenosine Triphosphatase Activity by Adrenal Cells Endocrinology, September 1, 2000; 141(9): 3200 - 3209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Parhami-Seren, C. Bell, M. N. Margolies, and G. T. Haupert Jr. Monoclonal Antibodies That Distinguish Between Two Related Digitalis Glycosides, Ouabain and Digoxin J. Immunol., October 15, 1999; 163(8): 4360 - 4366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Manunta, P. Stella, R. Rivera, D. Ciurlino, D. Cusi, M. Ferrandi, J. M. Hamlyn, and G. Bianchi Left Ventricular Mass, Stroke Volume, and Ouabain-Like Factor in Essential Hypertension Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 450 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kawamura, J. Guo, Y. Itagaki, C. Bell, Y. Wang, G. T. Haupert Jr., S. Magil, R. T. Gallagher, N. Berova, and K. Nakanishi On the structure of endogenous ouabain PNAS, June 8, 1999; 96(12): 6654 - 6659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ferrari, L. Torielli, M. Ferrandi, G. Padoani, L. Duzzi, M. Florio, F. Conti, P. Melloni, L. Vesci, N. Corsico, et al. PST2238: A New Antihypertensive Compound That Antagonizes the Long-Term Pressor Effect of Ouabain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 1998; 285(1): 83 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
O. Aizman, P. Uhlen, M. Lal, H. Brismar, and A. Aperia Ouabain, a steroid hormone that signals with slow calcium oscillations PNAS, November 6, 2001; 98(23): 13420 - 13424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |