(Hypertension. 1997;30:1279-1283.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, University Hospital, Pavia, Italy.
Correspondence to Colomba Falcone, MD, Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, IRCCS Pol. S. Matteo, University Hospital, P.le Golgi, 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: myocardial ischemia dental pulp test coronary artery disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aims of this study in a large population of coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with and without hypertension were to (1) determine dental pain threshold and reaction to tooth pulp stimulation (PT) and (2) ascertain whether hypertensive CAD patients differ from normotensive ones in reactivity to pain.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All the patients were questioned about both their family history of
hypertension and cardiovascular disease and their
smoking habits. The study excluded patients with blood pressure values
200/120 mm Hg at rest, secondary forms of hypertension, history
of stroke, severe valvular disease, congestive heart failure,
diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy,
unstable angina, or clinical conditions that did not permit temporary
withdrawal of therapy. Female patients were also excluded from the
study.
In basal conditions, three measurements of blood pressure were taken with a standard sphygmomanometer with the patient in the supine position; a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was also recorded. All tests were performed in pharmacological washout: calcium channel blocking agents and nitrates were suspended 48 hours before. No patient was receiving therapy with ß-adrenergic blocking agents at the time of the study. The ß-blockers had been gradually reduced and stopped 1 week before our examination. No patient received digitalis. Informed written consent for all tests was obtained from all subjects. The present study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital.
Pulp Test
For PT, which was performed immediately before the ergometric
stress test, all patients were at rest and in comfortable conditions.
The patients were examined with an electrical tooth pulp stimulator,
which is commonly used in dentistry to assess pulp vitality. On the
morning of the PT, all patients underwent a prior dental checkup to
exclude tooth fractures, abrasions, caries, fillings, or significant
periodontal disease. As described previously, the pulp tester used for
this study (Digilog Demetron Research Corp) was designed to deliver a
current impulse of increasing intensity from 10 to 500 mA; a scale of 0
to 9 was displayed on the instrument to indicate the intensity of the
stimuli.8 The stimulator was applied on at least two
healthy upper incisors and on one inferior incisor through
a metal cylinder that was placed on the enamel surface; an electrode
paste was applied to the cylinder for improved contact, and the circuit
was closed by the hand of the operator in contact with the lips of the
patient. All patients had previously been instructed to indicate the
commencement of dental pain by lifting a hand. Immediately after the
test interruption, the patients were asked to grade the intensity of
the pain they experienced on a scale of 1 to 10. Dental pain threshold
was defined as the minimal current intensity level that elicited any
pulp sensation (10 to 500 mA; on the tester, 1 to 9). All patients were
applied the highest current intensity (500 mA; on the tester, 9).
Threshold reaction (mean pain intensity at dental pain threshold) and
maximal reaction (pain intensity at the maximal stimulation) were
determined for all patients. The lack of sensation at the maximal
stimulation of 500 mA was defined as reaction 0. Blood pressure values
were recorded both immediately before the beginning of the test and
during the tooth pulp stimulation.
Ergometric Stress Test
A multistage bicycle ergometric stress test was performed in all
patients in the supine position with an initial workload of 25 W and
subsequent stepwise increments of 25 W every 3 minutes at a pedaling
frequency of 60 rpm. Standard 12-lead ECG and blood pressure were
recorded initially in basal conditions with the patient lying in
the supine position for 10 minutes and subsequently just before the
test, at the end of each stage, at the appearance of ECG signs of
ischemia and/or of anginal pain, at peak exercise, and every 3
minutes during recovery. Three ECG leads
(D3,V5V6) were monitored
continuously and displayed on an oscilloscope throughout the test.
During the test, the patients were continuously asked about the
appearance of angina or other symptoms. A positive ECG response was
defined as the occurrence of at least 1 mm ST depression compared
with the baseline tracing. Ischemia threshold was defined as
the appearance of 1 mm flat or downsloping ST-segment depression
0.08 second after J-point in comparison with baseline ECG; angina
threshold was defined as the time of the first appearance of chest pain
during the test. Exercise test was interrupted at the occurrence of any
of the following conditions: moderate to severe angina, dyspnea,
exhaustion, ST-segment depression >3 mm, and major
arrhythmias. The double product (heart
ratexsystolic blood pressure) was calculated in basal
conditions, at the ischemia and angina threshold, and at peak
exercise.
Pain Assessment
In the patients who experienced the occurrence of chest pain
during the ergometric stress test, the intensity of the anginal pain
was graded on a scale of 1 to 10. The patients were also asked to
retrospectively grade, on the same scale, the anginal pain intensity
which they had experienced previously during acute myocardial
infarction and/or during spontaneous episodes of angina pectoris
occurring in daily life.
Angiography Study
All patients underwent cardiac ventriculography and Sones
selective coronary arteriography not more than 1 month before
or subsequent to the ergometric stress test. Left ventriculography was
performed before coronary arteriography in the 30° right
anterior oblique projection; ventricular volumes and
left ejection fraction were calculated by the standard area-length
method. Multiple views of each coronary artery were filmed:
significant coronary artery disease was defined as the presence
of
50% stenosis in a major coronary vessel.
Statistical Analysis
The characteristics of the two groups are reported as mean±SD.
The differences between the means were evaluated by Student's
t test for variables normally distributed. Statistical
evaluation was made by variance and regression analysis, both
of which used computerized SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social
Sciences). The Mann-Whitney test was used for two independent
nonparametric samples. A value of P<.05 was
considered to be statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Features
History of angina was present in 118 patients (64.8%) of G1
(29 on effort, 9 at rest, 7 unstable, and 73 mixed) and in 142 patients
(81.6%) of G2 (48 on effort, 15 at rest, 9 unstable, and 70 mixed)
(Table 1
). The mean anginal pain
intensity, which was suffered during spontaneous episodes of angina
occurring in daily life, was lower in G1 than in G2 patients
(P<.05). Of patients without anginal symptoms during daily
life, 24 of G1 and 13 of G2 referred experienced dyspnea, 3 of G1 and 1
of G2 had a history of syncope, 15 of G1 and 8 of G2 showed silent
myocardial ischemia during a routine physical examination, and
22 of G1 and 10 of G2 showed ECG signs of effort ischemia in
postmyocardial infarction evaluation. The prevalence of a previous
myocardial infarction was similar in patients of both groups, whereas
the mean pain intensity during acute myocardial infarction, as
retrospectively graded by the single patients, was significantly lower
in the hypertensive patients than in the normotensive ones
(P<.05). A significantly higher prevalence of painless
myocardial infarction was observed in the hypertensive patients
(P<.05).
|
Exercise Stress Test
The exercise stress test was positive for myocardial
ischemia in all patients, as inclusion criterion. Silent
myocardial ischemia was observed in 110 patients (60.4%) of G1
and in 85 (48.8%) of G2 (P<.05). The characteristics of
the two groups are reported in Table 2
.
The double products, both in basal conditions and at peak exercise,
were higher in the hypertensive than in the normotensive patients. The
double products both at the ischemia threshold and pain
threshold were similar between the two groups. ST-segment depression
was also similar in both groups of patients.
|
Pulp Test
During PT, 58 patients (31.8%) of G1 and 24 (13.7%) of G2
experienced no pain, even at the highest current intensity (threshold
0, P<.01). The 124 hypertensive patients who felt dental
pain during PT had a higher mean dental pain threshold, a lower mean
threshold reaction, and a lower mean maximal reaction (6.6±2.3,
3.8±1.5, and 4.5±1.6, respectively) than did the normotensive
symptomatic ones (5.2±4.8, Mann-Whitney 0.0018; 4.7±3.1,
Mann-Whitney 0.0002; and 6.6±1.9, Mann-Whitney 0.0000, respectively)
(Fig 1
).
|
Both in hypertensive and in normotensive patients, a statistical correlation was found between the mean maximal reaction during PT and the prevalence of symptoms during daily life (P=.031 and P=.028, respectively). The higher the dental pain intensity was at the maximal tooth pulp stimulation, the higher was the prevalence of angina during daily life.
In hypertensive patients, mean basal diastolic blood pressure was significantly correlated with mean dental pain threshold, with mean threshold reaction, and with mean maximal reaction (P=.048, P=.005, and P=.005 respectively), whereas the mean basal systolic blood pressure was not. No significant variations in blood pressure values were observed during tooth pulp stimulation in comparison with the baseline values.
Coronary Arteriography
The extent of CAD did not differ statistically between the two
groups of patients (Table 3
). Left
ventricular end-diastolic volume and left
ventricular end-diastolic pressure were higher
in the hypertensive patients than in the normotensive ones
(P<.05), whereas no difference between the two groups of
patients was observed in the ejection fraction.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The literature demonstrates an association between a diminished responsiveness to painful stimuli and arterial hypertension, a finding that suggests a relationship between the central mechanisms involved in pain modulation and arterial blood pressure regulation.17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 A delayed response to noxious stimuli (such as hot plate, electric shock, or mechanical force applied to a limb) has also been reported in experimentally hypertensive animals.12 15 18 20 21 22 26 27
In patients with high blood pressure, CAD may be present but clinically silent.28 29 30 The relationship between essential hypertension and silent myocardial ischemia is not fully understood. The prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia in CAD populations varies from 16% to 70%.2 3 9 31 32 33 34 In a recent work, Siegel et al35 reported a 27% prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia in hypertensive subjects who showed neither clinical nor angiographic evidence of CAD. In our hypertensive population with angiographic evidence of CAD, the incidence of exercise-induced silent myocardial ischemia was 60.4%. Patients with high arterial blood pressure showed significantly lower prevalence of anginal symptoms during daily life than did the normotensive ones. Mean anginal pain intensity, both during transitory episodes of ischemia occurring in daily life and during previous acute myocardial infarction, proved to be significantly lower in hypertensive patients than in the normotensive ones. Moreover, the prevalence of painless myocardial infarction was significantly higher in patients with hypertension. During exercise-induced myocardial ischemia, the double product at the ischemia threshold was not different between the two groups of patients: the similar severity and distribution of the CAD between patients with and without arterial hypertension may justify this finding. The greater double product at peak exercise that was observed in the hypertensive group may be related to the sudden rise in blood pressure during stress. The higher incidence of silent ischemia that was observed in the hypertensive group was not correlated with a different entity of ST-segment depression at peak of exercise.
Pulp Test Response in Hypertensive and Normotensive CAD
Patients
In this study, the reactivity to dental pulp stimulation was
quantified and correlated with the prevalence of symptoms during daily
life in both groups of patients. In the hypertensive subjects, the use
of the tooth pulp stimulation confirmed the existence of a relationship
between increased arterial blood pressure and decreased
pain perception.23 36 37 38 39 Also, in CAD populations, the PT
showed significant differences in dental pain threshold and reaction
between patients with silent myocardial ischemia and the ones
with symptomatic ischemia.8 11
In the present study, the prevalence of patients who remained asymptomatic during PT, even at the maximum tooth pulp stimulation of 500 mA, was significantly higher in the hypertensive than in the normotensive group. When they were symptomatic, the hypertensive patients had a higher mean dental pain threshold and a lower mean threshold reaction and maximal reaction than the normotensive symptomatic subjects. In this population, a positive correlation between the prevalence of angina during daily life and the maximal reaction to tooth pulp stimulation was found both in the hypertensive and in the normotensive groups.
Although several hypotheses about the phenomenon of hypertension-associated hypalgesia have been proposed, the underlying causes of this decreased responsiveness to noxious stimuli in hypertensive subjects remain to be fully identified. Several anatomic, physiological, and pharmacological findings support the hypothesis of a relationship between the various central mechanisms that are involved in pain modulation and in arterial blood pressure regulation; various studies have described an association, or at least a partial overlap, between the brain circuits involved in the control of blood pressure and pain perception.21 23 40 41 42 43 Several investigators have reported an involvement of the baroreceptor reflex arc in the phenomenon of hypertension-related analgesia: carotid sinus baroreceptor denervation in rats was found to abolish the hypalgesic behavior associated with an acute rise in blood pressure.18 24 25 Furthermore, the activation of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor afferent input induced by increased central venous pressure was found to be associated with a hypalgesic response in the rat.43 44 There is the possibility that the baroreceptor-mediated modulation of pain perception may represent one aspect of a more widespread capacity of the baroreflex system to inhibit the central nervous system processes. In fact, several lines of evidence suggest that blood pressurerelated antinociception may be due to attenuated transmission of noxious stimuli to the spinal level; this attenuation may be due to descending inhibitory influence from brain stem sites that is involved in cardiovascular regulation and pain modulation.43
In our hypertensive group, the response to PT (dental pain threshold, threshold reaction, and maximal reaction) was found to correlate with diastolic blood pressure values but not with systolic ones. The diastolic pressure is probably one of the most important factors that may influence the baroreceptor reflex arc function, thus playing an important role in the adaptive somatosensory response of the body to stressful events. In fact, the chronic elevation of blood pressure could exert a tonic inhibitory influence on nociception, which is mediated by the baroreceptor reflex arc, resulting in a decreased pain perception.
It has been suggested that endogenous opioid peptides also play a role in blood pressure regulation under stressful physiological conditions.45 Zamir et al19 reported that rats with differing congenital susceptibility to hypertension have abnormally high levels of endogenous opioid activity in the pituitary gland, in the hypothalamus, and in the cervical spinal cord; the role of endogenous opioid peptides in the development and maintenance of hypertension is, however, less clear.
Conclusion
Our results demonstrated that patients with documented CAD and
essential hypertension differ from normotensive CAD patients in
reactivity to pain. Significantly higher dental pain threshold and
lower reaction to pulp stimulation characterized our hypertensive
patients. Arterial hypertension seems to be an additional
factor in the modulation of pain perception in CAD patients.
Received November 13, 1996; first decision January 10, 1997; accepted April 29, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. E. Sheifer, B. J. Gersh, N. D. Yanez III, P. A. Ades, G. L. Burke, and T. A. Manolio Prevalence, predisposing factors, and prognosis of clinically unrecognized myocardial infarction in the elderly J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2000; 35(1): 119 - 126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |