(Hypertension. 1997;30:1525-1530.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Institute of Human Nutrition (D.S.G., A.A.J.), University of Southampton, Bassett Crescent East Southampton, and the Metabolic and Molecular Programming Group (S.C.L.-E.), University Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, UK.
Correspondence address to Dr S.C. Langley-Evans, Metabolic and Molecular Programming Group, Department of University Medicine, Southampton General Hospital, Level D South Block, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD. E-mail slang{at}soton.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: birth weight glucocorticoids protein rats blood pressure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The placental enzyme 11-HSD2 regulates the transfer of maternal GC across the placenta and into the fetal compartment.6 The activity of 11-HSD2 correlates positively with birth weight in rats and in humans,2 7 suggesting an important role for this enzyme in regulating fetal growth and development. Furthermore, 11-HSD2 activity correlates negatively with placental weight in rats.2 Thus, Edwards et al8 postulated that low birth weight fetuses with a correspondingly large placenta that, in humans, are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk9 are exposed to a greater level of maternal GC in late gestation, mediated by the relative inactivity of 11-HSD2. In support of this hypothesis, the administration of low-dose dexamethasone (a weak substrate for 11-HSD2) to rats throughout pregnancy "programmed" hypertension into the resultant adult offspring.2 Moreover, treatment of pregnant rats with carbenoxolone, an 11-HSD2 inhibitor, induced hypertension in the adult offspring, an effect that was remediable by maternal adrenalectomy.5 Thus, programming of adult hypertension in this rat model appears to be a GC-inducible phenomenon.
Epidemiological studies of early life programming of cardiovascular disease indicate that maternal nutrition has a role in programming increased risk.10 Thus, high intake of carbohydrate in early pregnancy together with a low intake of dairy protein in early or late pregnancy is associated with lower birth weight babies11 and increased SBP at 40 years of age.12 The GC model of Edwards et al8 does not take into account a nutritional origin in the programming of adult hypertension in the rat. However, nutritional programming of adult blood pressure in the rat has been clearly demonstrated.3 13 14 Feeding a maternal low protein diet to rat dams lowers the birth weight of the resultant rat pups,3 reduces the activity of placental 11-HSD2 by 33%,14 and programs hypertension in the adult offspring.3 Furthermore, the low protein-induced hypertension is prevented by pharmacological blockade of maternal corticosterone synthesis,15 an effect that is reversed by maternal corticosterone replacement. Thus, low protein dietinduced hypertension is also a GC-dependent phenomenon. A major consequence of maternal protein restriction appears to be a resetting of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in the offspring. Low proteinexposed rats exhibit increased sensitivity to low-normal concentrations of corticosterone and have increased numbers of GC receptors,4 which may elevate SBP through direct actions in the vasculature.16 17 18
While the hypertension associated with maternal undernutrition is dependent on prenatal GC action, it is uncertain whether the higher blood pressure exhibited by low proteinexposed animals is dependent on continued GC influence in adult life, as in the spontaneously hypertensive rat.19 The aim of the study was to assess the importance of an intact adrenal gland, with respect to blood pressure regulation, in the offspring of rat dams exposed to either a maternal low protein or control diet throughout pregnancy.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals
All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the Home
Office Animals Act (1986). Wistar rats bred in the Southampton
University animal facility were used in all experiments. The animals
were housed in standard wire-mesh cages at a temperature of 22°C on a
12-hour light-dark cycle. A total of 14 female rats (n=7 per group)
weighing between 200 to 250 g were habituated (14 days) to either
a semi-synthetic control diet containing 18% casein or an equivalent
isoenergetic low protein diet containing 9% casein (Table 1
), as previously described.3
After 14 days the animals were mated (1 to 6 days) and maintained on
the semi-synthetic diet throughout gestation. At birth (day 22) the
animals were transferred to a standard laboratory chow diet (18.3%
protein, CRMX, Special Diet Services) and litters culled to 8 pups (4
male, 4 female). At 4 weeks of age the litters were weaned onto the
nonpurified chow diet.
|
At approximately 47±1 days of age the male offspring from each dietary group (18% casein n=24, 9% casein n=20) were either bilaterally adrenalectomized (A) under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia or sham operated (S).20 Postoperatively, adrenalectomized animals had free access to 0.9% NaCl solution to maintain physiological electrolyte concentrations. The four groups generated (18% casein-A, 18% casein-S, 9% casein-A and 9% casein-S) were then each subdivided into two further groups that received either corticosterone (C) replacement (10 mg/kg in 0.1 mL arachis oil) or vehicle (V) (0.1 mL arachis oil, an inert vehicle for the steroid suspension) twice daily (9 AM and 5 PM) for 14 days post surgery. A total of 8 groups were thus studied: 18AC, 18AV, 18SC, 18SV, 9AC, 9AV, 9SC, and 9SV (18% casein n=6/group, 9% casein n=5/group). The body weights of all animals were determined daily throughout the treatment period. The SBPs of all animals were determined before surgery (day 0), and then at 7 and 14 days after commencement of treatment. After the final blood pressure measurement on day 14, all animals were placed under nonrecoverable anesthesia and blood and organs collected. Animals receiving corticosterone replacement were killed approximately 1 hour after their last injection.
Blood Pressure Measurement
SBP was measured using an indirect tail-cuff method as described
in detail by Langley-Evans et al.21 An IITC model 229 blood
pressure recorder linked to a computer software package was used to
measure blood pressure using a preset alogorithm (Linton
Instrumentation). All blood pressures were measured between 11 AM and 4 PM. Blood pressure readings for
each animal were taken in triplicate with the average value
recorded. The indirect tail-cuff method has been validated against
direct arterial cannulation measurements taken in
conscious, unrestrained animals, and a correlation coefficient of
r=.974 established between the two methods.22 In
our hands, intra- and interassay variations of 4.7% and 7.9%,
respectively, were recorded.
Collection of Tissues
Blood was collected in heparinized tubes via cardiac puncture,
and whole brain and liver were rapidly excised and either maintained on
ice (brain) or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen (liver). The cerebellum,
hippocampus, and hypothalamus were dissected from whole brain as
previously described.23 All tissues were then frozen in
liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for up to 3 months before
biochemical analyses.
Enzyme Assays
For markers of GC activity the GC-inducible oligodendritic
enzyme GPDH (EC 1.1.1.8),24 hepatic TAT(EC
2.6.1.5),25 and astrocyte GS (EC 6.3.1.2)26
were assayed together with the GC-insensitive control enzyme MD (EC
1.1.1.37) using the methods of Langley and York.23 All
enzyme activities are expressed as nmoles substrate converted per
minute per mg protein. The methods of Smith et al27 or
Lowry et al28 were used as appropriate to estimate protein
concentrations.
Hormone Analyses
Corticosterone concentrations were determined in ethanolic
plasma extracts by a radioimmunoassay procedure, as previously
described.23
Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM. Results were compared by
three-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test for individual comparisons
where differences were indicated. Student's t test was used
for other analyses. Differences were accepted as statistically
significant at P<.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In ADX and sham-operated animals twice-daily corticosterone injections
for 14 days elevated plasma corticosterone concentrations to 2- to
3-fold above concentrations observed in sham-operated vehicle-treated
control animals (Table 3
). Adrenalectomy
reduced the corticosterone concentration to nondetectable levels when
measured at day 14. Maternal diet had no effect on the plasma
corticosterone concentration (Table 3
).
|
Before the surgical procedure, the low proteinexposed rats had
significantly higher SBP than the 18% casein exposed controls (9%
casein: 165±3.8 mm Hg, n=20; 18% casein: 145±3.3 mm Hg,
n=24; P<.0001). Table 4
illustrates the blood pressure response of each dietary group to the
experimental protocol. Significant differences of 14 to 19 mm Hg
were maintained between groups 18SV and 9SV throughout the 14-day
experiment. The higher blood pressure exhibited by the low
proteinexposed animals was reduced (19 mm Hg) by day 7 after
ADX (group 9AV). No effect of ADX on blood pressure was observed in the
parallel 18% casein group (18AV) (Table 4
). Corticosterone replacement
to ADX animals increased blood pressure, measured at day 7, in both
dietary groups (18AC and 9AC), although group 9AC appeared to exhibit a
greater response (mean blood pressure increase after 7 days of CORT
injections; group 18AC=31±16 mm Hg, group 9AC=37±18
mm Hg; P>.05). Corticosterone replacement transiently
raised blood pressure in group 18SC, but had no effect on the blood
pressure of group 9SC.
|
Activities of GC-inducible GPDH, TAT, and GS were determined in liver
and brain regions. The activity of GPDH was higher in group 9SV
compared with group 18SV in both the hippocampus (P=.09) and
the cerebellum (P=.05). Hippocampal GPDH appeared more
sensitive to the corticosterone replacement protocol in both ADX and
sham-operated rats of the low proteinexposed group. In both brain
regions of low proteinexposed rats and the cerebellum of control
rats, ADX significantly reduced the activity of GPDH (Table 5
). ADX decreased hippocampal GPDH by
24% in control rats (18AV), but this did not achieve statistical
significance (Table 5
). Corticosterone replacement significantly
elevated GPDH activity, relative to vehicle control animals, in both
brain regions of all sham and ADX animals. The specific activity of
hippocampal MD was similar in both dietary groups after corticosterone
replacement. Previous studies, using the same methodology, have
observed no effect of maternal diet on MD in either the hippocampus,
cerebellum, or liver,4 suggesting that alterations to
GC-inducible enzyme activities represent a GC-specific
effect.
|
Hepatic TAT is a peripheral GC-inducible
enzyme.25 In low proteinexposed, sham-operated controls
(group 9SV), the activity of hepatic TAT was significantly higher
(55%) than in the 18% caseinexposed, sham-operated control animals
(group 18SV) (P=.01). The specific activity of TAT increased
in response to corticosterone replacement in groups 18AC, 18SC, 9AC,
and 9SC (Table 5
) but was unaltered after ADX. Hepatic GS activity
increased after corticosterone replacement and was unaltered after ADX,
thereby exhibiting a response pattern similar to that observed for TAT
(Table 5
). The specific activity of hepatic MD was similar between
control groups (Table 5
). Prenatal dietary experience had no effect on
the activity of hepatic GS.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Successful ADX was confirmed by analysis of plasma CORT concentrations, which were nondetectable at 14 days post surgery. The level of CORT replacement dose was chosen on the basis of previous data in which a dose of 10 mg/kg per day CORT was ineffective at inducing increased activity of GC-inducible enzymes.20 It is apparent from the observed reduction in body weight after CORT treatment, consistent with the catabolic nature of high dose GCs,29 that the replacement dose of corticosteroid can be considered pharmacological rather than physiological and thus that it may obscure a specific GR-mediated effect from a mineralocorticoid receptormediated effect. Responses attributed to classic GC action must therefore be treated with some caution. Nevertheless, maintenance of ADX animals on 0.9% saline has no significant effect on their blood pressure,30 as reproduced here (group 18AV). Therefore the observed response (significantly decreased SBP over 14 days) in group 9AV may be largely attributable to the absence of GC stimulation rather than secondary mineralocorticoid action. This clearly implicates a functional role for the adrenal gland in maintaining the hypertensive state induced by prenatal protein restriction. A slight, delayed decrease in SBP, observed at postoperative day 14 relative to day 7, occurred in CORT-treated animals (except group 9SC), indicating an apparent vascular accommodation to the high GC replacement dose. A downregulation of GR receptors may facilitate such a response since GCs autoregulate their receptor population.31
GPDH activity provides an indirect central marker of GC action.24 The cerebellum, hippocampus, and hypothalamus are central GC target regions reflected by high densities of type II (GR) receptors through which almost exclusively all GC effects are mediated.32 The higher specific activities of central GPDH and hepatic TAT found in group 9SV relative to 18SV are consistent with our previous reports.4 This may reflect a tonic overstimulation of GR by a higher circulating CORT concentration, or rather increased GR densities. The latter appears more robust since the offspring of protein-restricted rat dams have moderately increased GR numbers in hippocampus and hypothalamus4 and exhibit an increased central sensitivity to corticosterone replacement as reflected by the elevated specific activities of GPDH in groups 9AC and 9SC relative to protein-replete control animals (group 18AC and 18SC). Furthermore, the present study and others4 33 have demonstrated low to normal plasma CORT concentrations in prenatally protein-restricted rats, which is inconsistent with overstimulation of normal GR densities. However, the possibility that prenatal protein restriction influences postnatal circulating GC concentrations cannot be excluded by the present study. Clearly the specific activity of GPDH in particular and, to a limited extent, the activities of hepatic GS and TAT parallel the changes in GC status in the present study, emphasizing the utility of these enzymes as markers of GC action.
Permanent alterations to GR expression may be a manifestation of the poor nutritional environment encountered in utero by the protein-restricted fetuses. Relatively mild neonatal stress elicited by daily handling permanently alters the subsequent expression and responsiveness of central receptor populations.34 The nutritional regimen used in this study, which is known to program central and peripheral GR densities,4 may incur a comparable physiological stress given that the normal doubling of body weight observed in control animals over the last 2 days' gestation is severely curtailed in the low proteinexposed group.35
The mechanisms that relate the prenatal nutritional environment to later cardiovascular dysregulation are unknown. Our hypothesis is that under conditions of protein restriction, the fetus responds, in the short-term, by making suitable adaptations to accommodate the disturbance in substrate supply. The long-term outcome of these adaptations is represented as an increased blood pressure and a relative propensity toward a diseased state. The maternal and/or fetal endocrine systems facilitate such adaptations, and evidence suggests that GC hormones, in particular, are essential agents in the development of high blood pressure in our rat model.4 14 15 36 37
11-HSD2 serves as a biochemical barrier for maternal GC access to the fetal compartment, converting bioactive steroid (corticosterone) into its inactive stable metabolite 11-dehydrocorticosterone.38 The activity of this enzyme correlates positively with placental weight in rats and negatively with fetal weight in both rats and humans,2 7 suggesting a role for the enzyme in modulating fetal growth. In late gestation the activity of 11-HSD in protein-restricted rats is significantly reduced relative to control animals,14 implying an increased transfer of GC from maternal to fetal compartments. Whether the efficacy of 11-HSD is such that it is still able to metabolize maternal GC despite reduced activity is unclear. The GC environment certainly influences the progression of hypertension in protein-restricted animals, since both pharmacological15 and surgical37 ADX of rat dams reverses the hypertensive effect of protein restriction. Moreover, inhibition of 11-HSD by carbenoxolone during pregnancy in the rat produces hypertensive offspring (Reference 55 and Langley-Evans, unpublished data, 1997). The effect is abolished if the dams are ADX, suggesting that prenatal exposure to excess maternal GC programs hypertension in these offspring.5
GCs have marked effects on the development and growth of many organs, particularly the lung, brain, and liver.39 At the central level, GCs decrease and mineralocorticoids increase blood pressure via their respective receptors.40 Disturbances in the activity of placental 11-HSD and central GR populations, both of which have been observed within our model of hypertension,4 14 may have the potential to alter future blood pressure control. Indeed, elevated activities of central GC-inducible enzymes observed in the present study and altered secretion of adrenocorticotrophic hormone observed previously4 may suggest just such a centrally orientated programming effect. Since significantly higher binding to GR has been observed in the aorta of prenatally protein-restricted animals,4 a peripheral mechanism for maintaining elevated SBP is possible. GCs increase transluminal Na+ and Ca2+ transport42 and expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptors,18 both acting in concert to increase vascular tone and raise blood pressure. A permissive effect of GC is to enhance reactivity to not only angiotensin II but also noradrenaline.43 Essential hypertensive patients have an increased vascular responsiveness to GC stimulation44 despite "normal" secretion rates and plasma concentrations of cortisol.
In conclusion we have demonstrated that in the model of maternal dietinduced hypertension, ADX reduces the high SBP exhibited by low proteinexposed animals to levels observed in control rats. Corticosterone replacement restores the higher blood pressure of these animals. Such a response is indicative of a GC-dependent phenomenon. We propose that an increased peripheral vascular, or central, sensitivity to GC action maintains the hypertensive state mediated either directly through GC receptors or indirectly through a permissive effect of GC on vasomodulatory compounds. The present findings support the Barker hypothesis1 in its most fundamental sense, that poor maternal nutrition may predispose the resultant offspring to adult-onset disease, and provide a parallel between this and the hypothesis proposed by Edwards et al,8 that a role for GCs exists in the etiology of adult hypertension.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received May 22, 1997; first decision June 12, 1997; accepted June 12, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Benediktsson R, Lindsay R, Noble J, Seckl JR, Edwards CRW. Glucocorticoid exposure in utero: a new model for adult hypertension. Lancet. 1993;341:339341.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Langley SC, Jackson AA. Increased systolic blood pressure in adult rats induced by fetal exposure to maternal low protein diets. Clin Sci. 1994;86:217222.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Langley-Evans SC, Gardner DS, Jackson AA. Evidence of programming of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis by maternal protein restriction during pregnancy. J Nutr. 1996;126:15781585.
5.
Lindsay RS, Lindsay M, Edwards CRW, Seckl JS.
Inhibition of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in pregnant rats and
the programming of blood pressure in the offspring.
Hypertension. 1996;27:12001204.
6.
Burton PJ, Waddell BJ. 11-Beta hydroxysteroid
dehydrogenase in the rat placenta: developmental changes and the
effects of altered glucocorticoid exposure. J Endocrinol. 1994;143:505513.
7. Stewart PM, Whorwood CB, Mason JI. Type 2 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in fetal and adult life. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;55:465471.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Edwards CRW, Benedikktsson R, Lindsay RS, Seckl JR. Dysfunction of placental glucocorticoid barrier: link between fetal environment and adult hypertension. Lancet. 1993;341:355357.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Barker DJP, Bull AR, Osmond C. Fetal and placental size and risk of hypertension in adult life. BMJ. 1990;301:259262.
10. Barker DJP, Gluckman PD, Godfrey KM, Harding JE, Owens JA, Robinson JS. Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet. 1993;341:938941.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Godfrey KM, Robinson S, Barker DJP, Osmond C, Cox V.
Maternal nutrition in early and late pregnancy in relation to placental
and fetal growth. BMJ. 1996;312:410414.
12. Campbell DM, Hall MH, Barker DJP, Cross J, Shiell AW, Godfrey KM. Diet in pregnancy and the offspring's blood pressure 40 years later. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:273280.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Langley-Evans SC, Phillips GJ, Jackson AA. In utero exposure to maternal low protein diets induces hypertension in weanling rats independently of maternal blood pressure changes. Clin Nutr. 1994;13:319324.
14. Langley-Evans SC, Phillips GJ, Benediktsson R, Gardner DS, Edwards CRW, Jackson AA, Seckl JR. Protein intake in pregnancy, placental glucocorticoid metabolism and the programming of hypertension in the rat. Placenta. 1996;17:169172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Langley-Evans SC. Hypertension induced by fetal exposure to maternal low protein diet in the rat is prevented by pharmacological blockade of glucocorticoid synthesis. J Hypertens. 1997;15:537544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Kornel L, Nelson WA, Manisundaram B, Chigurupati R, T. Hayashi T. Mechanism of the effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids on vascular smooth muscle contractility. Steroids. 1993;58:580587.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Whitworth JA, Brown MA, Kelly JJ, Williamson PM. Mechanisms of cortisol-induced hypertension in humans. Steroids. 1995;60:7680.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Provencher PH, Saltis J, Funder JW. Glucocorticoids but not mineralocorticoids modulate endothelin-1 and angiotensin II binding in SHR vascular smooth muscle cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;52:219225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Suzuki H, Zweifach W, Schmid-Schonbein W.
Glucocorticoid modulates vasodilator response of mesenteric arterioles
in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1996;27:114118.
20. Langley SC. Central Activity of Glucocorticoids and Glucocorticoid Receptors in the Genetically Obese Zucker Rat (fa/fa). Southampton, UK: University of Southampton; 1990. Thesis.
21. Langley-Evans SC, Welham SJM, Sherman RC, Jackson AA. Weanling rats exposed to maternal low-protein diets during discrete periods of gestation exhibit differing severity of hypertension. Clin Sci. 1996;91:607615.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Bunag RD. Validation in awake rats of a tail-cuff
method for measuring systolic blood pressure. J Appl
Physiol. 1973;34:279282.
23. Langley SC, York DA. Increased Type II glucocorticoid receptor numbers and glucocorticoid sensitive enzyme activities in the brain of the obese Zucker rat. Brain Res. 1990;533:268274.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kitraki E, Alexis MN, Styianopoulou F. Glucocorticoid regulation of glycerolphosphate dehydrogenase expression in the developing rat brain. Neurochem Res. 1995;20:285290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Shargill NS, York DA, Marchington DS. Regulation of hepatic aminotransferase in genetically obese rats. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;758:297306.
26. Patel AJ, Hunt A, Tahourdin CSM. Regulation of in vivo glutamine synthetase activity by glucocorticoids in the developing rat brain. Dev Brain Res. 1983;10:8391.
27. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, Mallia AK, Gartner FH, Provenzano MD, Fujimoto EK, Goeke NM, Olson BJ, Klenk DC. Measurement of protein using bicinchonic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985;150:7685.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:267275.
29. Devenport LD, Knehans A, Sundstrom A, Thomas T. Corticosterones dual metabolic actions. Life Sci. 1989;45:13891396.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Imms FJ, Neame RLB. Circulatory changes following adrenalectomy in the rat. Cardiovasc Res. 1974;8:268275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Svec F. Glucocorticoid receptor regulation. Life Sci. 1985;36:23592366.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Reul JMHM, van den Bosch FR, deKloet ER. Relative
occupation of type I and type II corticosteroid
receptors in rat brain following stress and dexamethasone
treatment: functional implications. J Endocrinol. 1987;115:459467.
33. Lunn PG, Austin S. Dietary manipulation of plasma albumin concentration. J Nutr. 1983;113:17911802.
34. Meaney MJ, O'Donnell D, Viau V, Bhatnagar S, Sarrieau A, Smythe J, Shanks N, Walker C-D. In: Zagon IS, McLaughlin PJ, eds. Receptors in the Developing Nervous System. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1993:163201.
35.
Langley-Evans SC, Gardner DS, Jackson AA. Association
of disproportionate growth of fetal rats in late gestation with raised
systolic blood pressure in later life. J Reprod
Fertil. 1996;106:307312.
36. Gardner DS, Langley-Evans SC, Jackson AA. Modulation of blood pressure by glucocorticoids in the rat. Proc Nutr Soc. 1996;55:220A. Abstract.
37. Gardner DS, Langley-Evans SC, Jackson AA. Maternal steroids induce later hypertension. Clin Sci. 1997;92:M45. Abstract.
38. Murphy BEP, Clark SJ, Donald IR, Pinsky M, Vedady D. Conversion of maternal cortisol to cortisone during placental transfer to the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974;118:538541.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Meyer JS. Biochemical effects of
corticosteroids on neural tissues. Physiol
Rev. 1985;65:9461021.
40.
van den Berg DTWM, deKloet ER, van Dijken HH, de Jong
W. Differential central effects of mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid
agonists and antagonists on blood pressure.
Endocrinology. 1990;126:118124.
41. Edwards CRW, Burt D, McIntyre MA, deKloet ER, Stewart PM, Brett L, Sutanto WS, Monder C. Localisation of 11 beta hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: tissue specific protector of the mineralocorticoid receptor. Lancet. 1988;1:986989.
42. Kornel L. The role of vascular steroid receptors in the control of vascular contractility and peripheral vascular resistance. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;45:195203.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Walker BR, Williams BC. Corticosteroids and vascular tone: mapping the messenger maze. Clin Sci. 1992;82:597605.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Walker BR, Best R, Shackleton CHL, Padfield PL, Edwards
CRW. Increased vasoconstictor sensitivity to glucocorticoids in
essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1996;27:190196.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Wang, Z. Huang, G. Lu, L. Lin, and M. Ferrari Hypoxia during pregnancy in rats leads to early morphological changes of atherosclerosis in adult offspring Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1321 - H1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Rodford, C. Torrens, R. C. M. Siow, G. E. Mann, M. A. Hanson, and G. F. Clough Endothelial dysfunction and reduced antioxidant protection in an animal model of the developmental origins of cardiovascular disease J. Physiol., October 1, 2008; 586(19): 4709 - 4720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cambonie, B. Comte, C. Yzydorczyk, T. Ntimbane, N. Germain, N. L. O. Le, P. Pladys, C. Gauthier, I. Lahaie, D. Abran, et al. Antenatal antioxidant prevents adult hypertension, vascular dysfunction, and microvascular rarefaction associated with in utero exposure to a low-protein diet Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): R1236 - R1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Washburn, P. A. Nixon, and T. M. O'Shea Follow-up of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Postnatal Dexamethasone: Blood Pressure and Anthropometric Measurements at School Age Pediatrics, October 1, 2006; 118(4): 1592 - 1599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. G. Magalhaes, A. B. da Silveira, D. L. Mota, and A. D. O. Paixao Renal function in juvenile rats subjected to prenatal malnutrition and chronic salt overload Exp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 91(3): 611 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dodic, A. T. McAlinden, A. J. Jefferies, E. M. Wintour, M. L. Cock, C. N. May, R. G. Evans, and K. M. Moritz Differential effects of prenatal exposure to dexamethasone or cortisol on circulatory control mechanisms mediated by angiotensin II in the central nervous system of adult sheep J. Physiol., March 15, 2006; 571(3): 651 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Riviere, A. Michaud, C. Breton, G. VanCamp, C. Laborie, M. Enache, J. Lesage, S. Deloof, P. Corvol, and D. Vieau Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) and ACE Activities Display Tissue-Specific Sensitivity to Undernutrition-Programmed Hypertension in the Adult Rat Hypertension, November 1, 2005; 46(5): 1169 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Hemmings, S. J. Williams, and S. T. Davidge Increased myogenic tone in 7-month-old adult male but not female offspring from rat dams exposed to hypoxia during pregnancy Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): H674 - H682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Mcmillen and J. S. Robinson Developmental Origins of the Metabolic Syndrome: Prediction, Plasticity, and Programming Physiol Rev, April 1, 2005; 85(2): 571 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. McMullen and S. C. Langley-Evans Maternal low-protein diet in rat pregnancy programs blood pressure through sex-specific mechanisms Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): R85 - R90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A Giussani, A. J Forhead, D. S Gardner, A. J W Fletcher, W R Allen, and A. L Fowden Postnatal cardiovascular function after manipulation of fetal growth by embryo transfer in the horse J. Physiol., February 15, 2003; 547(1): 67 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Antonow-Schlorke, M. Schwab, C. Li, and P. W Nathanielsz Glucocorticoid exposure at the dose used clinically alters cytoskeletal proteins and presynaptic terminals in the fetal baboon brain J. Physiol., February 15, 2003; 547(1): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Y. Khan, P. D. Taylor, V. Dekou, P. T. Seed, L. Lakasing, D. Graham, A. F. Dominiczak, M. A. Hanson, and L. Poston Gender-Linked Hypertension in Offspring of Lard-Fed Pregnant Rats Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 168 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Molnar, M. J. M. Nijland, D. C. Howe, and P. W. Nathanielsz Evidence for microvascular dysfunction after prenatal dexamethasone at 0.7, 0.75, and 0.8 gestation in sheep Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): R561 - R567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E Bertram and M. A Hanson Animal models and programming of the metabolic syndrome: Type 2 diabetes Br. Med. Bull., November 1, 2001; 60(1): 103 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bertram, A. R. Trowern, N. Copin, A. A. Jackson, and C. B. Whorwood The Maternal Diet during Pregnancy Programs Altered Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor and Type 2 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase: Potential Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Programming of Hypertension in Utero Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 2841 - 2853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Whorwood, K. M. Firth, H. Budge, and M. E. Symonds Maternal Undernutrition during Early to Midgestation Programs Tissue-Specific Alterations in the Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor, 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Isoforms, and Type 1 Angiotensin II Receptor in Neonatal Sheep Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 2854 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Ozaki, H Nishina, M A Hanson, and L Poston Dietary restriction in pregnant rats causes gender-related hypertension and vascular dysfunction in offspring J. Physiol., January 1, 2001; 530(1): 141 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Levitt, E. V. Lambert, D. Woods, C. N. Hales, R. Andrew, and J. R. Seckl Impaired Glucose Tolerance and Elevated Blood Pressure in Low Birth Weight, Nonobese, Young South African Adults: Early Programming of Cortisol Axis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4611 - 4618. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zicha and J. Kunes Ontogenetic Aspects of Hypertension Development: Analysis in the Rat Physiol Rev, October 1, 1999; 79(4): 1227 - 1282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tonkiss, M. Trzcinska, J. R. Galler, N. Ruiz-Opazo, and V. L. M. Herrera Prenatal Malnutrition-Induced Changes in Blood Pressure : Dissociation of Stress and Nonstress Responses Using Radiotelemetry Hypertension, July 1, 1998; 32(1): 108 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |