(Hypertension. 1998;31:349.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
AT2 Receptor Stimulation Increases Aortic Cyclic GMP in SHRSP by a Kinin-Dependent Mechanism
Institute of Pharmacology, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel and German Institute for High Blood Pressure Research, Heidelberg, Germany.
Correspondence to Peter Gohlke, PhD, Institute of Pharmacology, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Hospitalstrasse 4, 24105 Kiel, Germany
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In the present study we tested the hypothesis whether an angiotensin AT2 receptor-mediated stimulation of the bradykinin (BK)/nitric oxide (NO) system can account for the effects of AT1 receptor antagonism on aortic cGMP described previously in SHRSP. Adult SHRSP were treated for 4 hours with angiotensin II (ANG II) (30 ng/kg per min IV) or vehicle (0.9% NaCl IV). Animals were pretreated with vehicle, losartan (100 mg/kg PO), PD 123319 (30 mg/kg IV), losartan plus PD 123319, icatibant (500 µg/kg IV), NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 1 mg/kg IV), or minoxidil (3 mg/kg IV). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was continuously monitored over the 4-hour experimental period, and plasma ANG II and aortic cGMP were measured by RIA at the end of the study. ANG II infusion over 4 hours raised MAP by about 20 mm Hg. Losartan alone or losartan plus ANG II as well as minoxidil plus ANG II markedly reduced blood pressure when compared to vehicle-treated or ANG II-treated animals, respectively. Plasma levels of ANG II were increased 2-fold by ANG II infusion alone or by ANG II in combination with icatibant, L-NAME, or minoxidil. The increase in plasma ANG II levels was even more pronounced after losartan treatment. Aortic cGMP content was significantly increased by ANG II, losartan, losartan plus ANG II, and minoxidil plus ANG II by 60%, 45%, 68%, and 52%, respectively (P<.05). The effects of ANG II and of losartan plus ANG II on aortic cGMP content were both blocked by cotreatment with the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319. Icatibant and L-NAME abolished the effects of ANG II on aortic cGMP. Our results demonstrate the following: (1) ANG II increases aortic cGMP by an AT2 receptor-mediated action because the effect could be prevented by an AT2 receptor antagonist; (2) the effect of ANG II was not secondary to blood pressure increase because it remained under reduction of MAP with minoxidil; (3) losartan increased aortic cGMP most likely by increasing plasma ANG II levels with a subsequent stimulation of AT2 receptors; and (4) the effects of AT2 receptor stimulation are mediated by BK and, subsequently, NO because they were abolished by B2 receptor blockade as well as by NO synthase inhibition.
Key Words: angiotensin II • AT1 receptor antagonist • AT2 receptor • bradykinin • nitric oxide • cGMP • losartan
Abbreviations: ANG II = angiotensin II • BK = bradykinin • L-NAME = NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester • MAP = mean arterial blood pressure • NO = nitric oxide • RAS = renin-angiotensin system • SHRSP = stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS), with its effector peptide angiotensin II (ANG II), plays an important role in the cardiovascular, electrolyte, and fluid homeostasis and has been implicated as an causative factor in the development of hypertension.1 Inhibitors of the RAS such as angiotens inconverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and the nonpeptide antagonists of the AT1 receptor have been successfully introduced in the treatment of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. AT1 antagonists such as losartan interfere with the RAS by a specific blockade of the AT1 receptor which mediates most of the known actions of ANG II.2–4 ACE inhibitors, on the other hand, not only interfere with the RAS by inhibition of ANG II generation, but, in addition, also potentiate the effects of bradykinin (BK) by inhibition of BK degradation.5 Two major tools have been introduced in recent years to study the contribution of BK to the cardiovascular actions of ACE inhibitors: first, the combined treatment with an ACE inhibitor and with a specific BK B2 receptor antagonist such as icatibant, and second, the comparison of the effects of an ACE inhibitor with those of an AT1 receptor antagonist which block the RAS without an interaction with kinin metabolism. With these approaches, several investigators have demonstrated that a number of actions of ACE inhibitors is related to cardiovascular control can be blocked by B2 receptor antagonism and thus be related to kinins.5 For example, in a series of experiments our laboratory demonstrated that long-term treatment with ACE inhibitors improved cardiac function and metabolism in hearts from SHRSP and preserved endothelial function as indicated by an increased vascular nitric oxide (NO) production.6–8 All these effects could be prevented by B2 receptor antagonism, suggesting that they were BK mediated. On the other hand, we observed that the AT1 antagonist losartan produced strikingly similar effects as the ACE inhibitor under identical treatment conditions.9 These results indirectly pointed that losartan, like the ACE inhibitor, can also interact with the kinin/NO system. One possible mechanism for such an interaction could be related to a stimulation of non-AT1 receptors, particularly the AT2 receptor, because losartan at therapeutic doses levels the AT2 receptor unopposed2,4 and because AT1 receptor antagonism engenders an increase in plasma ANG II levels as a result of blockade of the AT1 receptor-mediated negative feedback inhibition of renin secretion in the kidney.10 In line with this hypothesis are recent studies in bovine endothelial cells,11 isolated rat carotid arteries,12 canine microvessels from coronary arteries,13 rat aortic strips,14 and rat kidney,15 suggesting that ANG II or metabolites of ANG II can stimulate NO production. Furthermore, in a rat model of heart failure induced by myocardial infarction, Liu et al16 demonstrated that the decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and left ventricular systolic pressure induced by AT1 receptor antagonism was blocked by an AT2 antagonist and partially blocked by a B2 receptor antagonist. Treatment was started 2 months after myocardial infarction and was continued for another 2 months. This study indicated that the effect of the AT1 antagonist on cardiac function was dependent on the activation of AT2 receptors and was in part mediated by kinins.
In the present study, we investigated the effect of an acute oral treatment with the AT1 antagonist losartan on aortic cGMP content. The hypothesis was that increased plasma ANG II concentrations during AT1 receptor blockade can account for the effects of losartan on aortic cGMP by stimulation of unopposed AT2 receptors. Therefore, we compared the effects of losartan with those of exogenously (intravenously) applied ANG II alone. In additional groups, we stimulated AT2 receptors by infusion of ANG II during AT1 receptor blockade and studied the effects of ANG II during AT2 receptor blockade with the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319. In addition, we tested the hypothesis whether the stimulatory effects of ANG II on aortic cGMP are mediated by the BK/NO system by blocking the BK B2 receptor with icatibant as well as by inhibition of NO synthase with L-NAME. Finally, to exclude the possibility that blood pressure increases induced by ANG II infusion may indirectly activate vasodilatory systems such as the NO/cGMP system in vascular endothelium, we also studied the effects of ANG II during conditions of marked blood pressure reduction induced by treatment with the arterial vasodilator minoxidil.
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Male 18- to 22-week-old (280–320 g) SHRSP bred at the Department of Pharmacology in Kiel were used for the experiments. All rats were housed at constant humidity (60±5%) and temperature (25±1°C) and kept on a 12-hour light/dark cycle. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines for animal experiments of the University of Kiel and was approved by the German governmental office dealing with animal protection.
Surgical Procedure
One day before the experiments, rats were cannulated under ether anesthesia with catheters (PP-10 in PP-50 for arterial catheters, PP-25 for venous catheters; Portex Corp., Hythe, UK) in the right femoral artery for direct recording of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and in the right femoral vein for intravenous drug infusion.
Blood Pressure Measurement
MAP was measured directly by use of a Statham P23 Db pressure transducer (Gold Inc., Oxnard, Calif.) connected to the right femoral arterial catheter. The blood pressure signal was amplified by a Gould Brush pressure processor (Gold Inc., Oxnard, Calif.) and monitored on a Gold Brush 2400 recorder (Gold Inc., Oxnard, Calif.). MAP was recorded continuously in conscious and unrestrained animals throughout the experimental period.
General Procedure
One day after the surgery, the femoral artery catheter was connected to the pressure transducer, which was attached to the monitoring system. After a stabilization period of at least 30 minutes, basal MAP was recorded. Thereafter, the animals were pretreated with either vehicle, the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan, the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319, losartan plus PD 123319, the NO-synthase inhibitor L-NAME, the BK B2 receptor antagonist icatibant, or the arterial vasodilator minoxidil according to the treatment groups given below followed by a 4-hour infusion of either physiological saline or ANG II. MAP was continuously monitored during the 4-hour infusion period. At the end of the experimental period, 2 mL blood were withdrawn from the arterial catheter for the measurement of plasma ANG II concentration. Immediately after blood collection, the rats were decapitated. A 20 to 30 mm segment of the proximal part of the thoracic aorta just distal to the aortic arch was excised, dissected, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -20°C until cGMP content was measured.
Experimental Protocol
Animals were randomly divided into 11 groups.
Group 1: control (n=14); rats were pretreated orally by gavage with distilled water (1 mL) or by an intravenous bolus injection of physiological saline (1 mL) followed by an intravenous infusion of physiological saline (1 mL/h).
Group 2: ANG II 30 ng/kg per min (n=25); rats were pretreated orally by gavage with distilled water (1 mL) or by IV bolus injection of physiological saline (1 mL) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min) dissolved in physiological saline.
Group 3: Losartan (n=7); rats were pretreated orally by gavage (1 mL) with losartan (100 mg/kg) followed by an IV infusion of physiological saline (1 mL/h).
Group 4: Losartan plus ANG II (n=7); rats were pretreated orally by gavage (1 mL) with losartan (100 mg/kg) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 5: PD 123319 (n=8); rats were pretreated with PD 123319 (30 mg/kg per mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of physiological saline (1 mL/h).
Group 6: PD 123319 plus ANG II (n=8); rats were pretreated intravenously with PD 123319 (30 mg/kg per mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 7: Losartan plus PD 123319 plus ANG II (n=8); rats were pretreated orally by gavage with losartan (100 mg/kg) and intravenously with PD 123319 (30 mg/kg per mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 8: L-NAME plus ANG II (n=10); rats were pretreated intravenously with L-NAME (1 mg/kg per 0.1 mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 9: Icatibant plus ANG II (n=10); rats were pretreated intravenously with icatibant (0.5 mg/kg per 0.1 mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 10: Minoxidil plus ANG II (n=11); rats were pretreated intravenously with minoxidil (3 mg/kg per 0.1 mL physiological saline, IV bolus injection) followed by an IV infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min, 1 mL/h).
Group 11: ANG II 3 ng/kg per min (n = 10); receiving 3 ng/kg per min ANG II (IV infusion, 1 mL/h)
Experiments were started between 5 a.m. and 6 a.m. using 4 to 6 animals per day. On each experimental day, one control rat treated IV with physiological saline (group 1) and/or one angiotensin II (30 ng/kg per min) IV-treated rat (group 2) was included.
Plasma ANG II Measurements
Blood (2 mL) was withdrawn from the arterial catheter directly into a syringe containing 0.1 mL inhibitor solution (25 mmol/L 1.10 phenanthroline, 125 mmol/L EDTA, 0.2 g/L neomycin sulfate, and 1% ethanol) at 4°C. The samples were immediately centrifuged at 6000g and 4°C for 10 minutes. Plasma was separated, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until analyzed. Plasma ANG II immunoreactivity was determined by radioimmunoassay. Briefly, plasma (50 µL was incubated with 450 µL of 0.1 mol/L Tris-acetate buffer (RIA buffer), pH 7.4, containing 0.1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100, 50 µL tracer 125J-ANG II (4000 cpm), and 50 µL antiserum 925 (a gift of Dr. Peter Admiraal, Rotterdam, The Netherlands), final dilution in the assay 7.9 x 10-6 for 20 hours at 4°C. The antibody-antigen complex was separated from "free" ANG II by addition of dextran-coated charcoal and subsequent centrifugation. Free radioactive ANG II (pellet) was counted in a gamma counter (1470 Wizard, Wallac, Turku, Finland). The evaluation of the samples was carried out by computer analysis, and standard curves were smoothed with spline functions. Standards ranged from 1 to 250 fmol/tube, and the detection limit was 0.5 to 0.8 pg ANG II/tube. The ANG II RIA showed cross-reactivities of 100% for ANG(4–8), 73% for ANG(3– 8), 55% for ANG III, and <0.2% for ANG I, ANG(2–10), and ANG(1–7).17 The antiserum is sensitive toward 1.10 phenanthroline, an inhibitor used to prevent ANG II degradation. This inhibitor gave nonspecific interference in the RIA of 4.5 pg/tube. The ANG II data have been corrected accordingly. Results are expressed as picograms per milliliter (pg/mL).
Aortic cGMP Content
cGMP in the aorta was determined by a specific RIA (Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany). The frozen aortas were each weighted, pulverized in liquid nitrogen by mortar and pestle, and transferred into 2 mL ethanol. The samples were sonicated for 10 seconds at 4°C and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 6000g. The supernatants were lyophilized and resuspended in 0.5 mL sodium acetate buffer (0.05 mol/L, pH 5.8) containing 0.01% sodium azide. After addition of 25 µL of an acetylation reagent (one part acetanhydrite and two parts triethylamine), the samples were vortexed, and aliquots of 100 µL were transferred into tubes containing 100 µL antiserum (rabbit anti-cGMP serum). After incubation for 1 hour at room temperature, 100 µL tracer ([125I]2'-o-succinyl-cGMP tyrosine methyl ester) was added, and the samples were incubated for another 15 to 18 hours at 4°C. Then, the samples were incubated for 10 minutes with 500 µL of a second antibody, Amerlex M (anti-rabbit antibody from donkey). After centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1500g the supernatant was discarded and the radioactivity in the pellet was counted in a gamma counter. cGMP content was expressed as femtomoles per gram fresh weight (fmol/g).
Drugs
Losartan potassium (2-n-butyl-4-chloro-5-hydroxy-methyl-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl)methyl]imidazole, potassium salt) was obtained from DuPont Merck (Wilmington, Del.). PD 123319 1-[[4-(Dimethylamino)-3-metylphenyl]methyl]-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazol[4,5-c]pyridine-6-carboxylic acid, ditrifluoroacetate, monohydrate was a gift from Dr. Joan Keiser) (Parke-Davis, Ann Arbor, Mich.). Icatibant (Hoe 140) (D-Arg,[Hyp3, Thi5, D-Tic7, Oic8]-bradykinin) was obtained from Hoechst Marion Roussel (Frankfurt, Germany). L-NAME and minoxidil were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (Deisenhofen, Germany).
Statistics
All results are presented as mean±SEM. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant differences between groups were further analyses with Turkey’s method for multiple comparisons. Analysis of blood pressure data was performed by ANOVA with repeated measures using the SYSTAT statistical software. When a significant difference was found between groups, the univariate F-test was used for analysis of differences between the control group and various treatment groups. A significance level of P<<.05 was accepted.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Blood Pressure Measurements
MAP was continuously monitored during the 4-hour infusion period. Under control conditions, that is during a 4-hour infusion of vehicle (physiological saline), MAP remained constant at 184±3.7 mm Hg. ANG II infusion (30 ng/kg per min) over 4 hours raised MAP by 19.1±1.4 mm Hg. Losartan alone as well as losartan in combination with an ANG II infusion (30 ng/kg per min) markedly reduced MAP by 36±2.3 mm Hg and 44.6±2.0 mm Hg when compared with vehicle-treated or ANG II-treated animals, respectively (Fig 1). Combined blockade of AT1 and AT2 receptors with losartan and PD 123319 in combination with ANG II infusion reduced MAP by 46±1.5 and 20±1.4 when compared with vehicle-treated and losartan plus ANG II-treated rats, respectively (Fig 1). The AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 did not alter MAP when compared with vehicle treated rats (data not shown). The blood pressure increase induced by infusion of 30 ng/kg per min ANG II was not affected by cotreatment with either the AT2 antagonist PD 123319, the B2 receptor antagonist icatibant, or the NO-synthase inhibitor L-NAME (data not shown). In contrast, in SHRSP treated with ANG II (30 ng/kg per min), MAP was markedly reduced when the animals were pretreated with the arterial vasodilator minoxidil (Fig 1). A 4-hour infusion of ANG II at the lower dose of 3 ng/kg per min did not alter MAP when compared with vehicle-treated rats (Fig 1).
|
Plasma ANG II Concentrations
Plasma concentrations of ANG II were increased about 2-fold by ANG II infusion (30 ng/kg per min) alone or by infusion of 30 ng/kg per min ANG II in combination with PD 1213319, icatibant, L-NAME, or minoxidil (Fig 2). The increase in plasma ANG II levels was even greater after treatment with losartan alone (3.5-fold increase) or losartan in combination with ANG II infusion (2.6-fold increase). A marked 8-fold increase in plasma ANG II concentration was observed during infusion of 30 ng/kg per min ANG II and concomitant blockade of AT1 as well as AT2 receptors with losartan and PD 123319, respectively. The low dose of 3 ng/kg per min ANG II did not affect plasma levels of ANG II when compared with vehicle-treated controls (70.1±13.3 versus 92.3±7.7 pg/mL in vehicle treated rats).
|
Aortic cGMP
Aortic cGMP content was significantly increased after a 4-hour infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min) as well as 4 hours after oral pretreatment of rats with losartan by 60% and 45%, respectively, when compared with vehicle-treated controls (Fig 3). The combination of AT1 blockade with losartan plus infusion of ANG II (30 ng/kg per min) further increased aortic cGMP content (68% increase when compared with vehicle-treated controls) (Fig 3). The effects of ANG II infusion alone and of losartan plus ANG II infusion on aortic cGMP content was abolished by blockade of AT2 receptors with PD 123319 (Fig 3). The AT2 receptor antagonist alone had no effect on aortic cGMP content (data not shown). Blockade of BK B2 receptors with icatibant as well as inhibition of NO synthase with L-NAME markedly attenuated the effects of ANG II infusion on aortic cGMP (Fig 3). The effect of ANG II infusion (30 ng/kg per min) on aortic cGMP was not secondary to the blood pressure increase induced by ANG II because a concomitant reduction of MAP by pretreatment with minoxidil did not reduce the effect of ANG II (57% increase when compared to vehicle-treated rats) (Fig 3). A 4-hour infusion of ANG II at the lower dose of 3 ng/kg per min did not significantly alter aortic cGMP content when compared with vehicle-treated rats (20% increase versus controls) (data not shown).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The major finding of the present study is that ANG II stimulates the production of cGMP in the vascular wall by an AT2 receptor-dependent mechanism. The effect of ANG II on aortic cGMP was abolished by inhibition of NO-synthase with L-NAME as well as by blockade of BK B2 receptors with icatibant. These findings suggest that activation of NO synthase as well as stimulation of BK B2 receptors are both involved in the AT2 receptor-dependent actions of ANG II on aortic cGMP.
The increase in aortic cGMP could be observed during conditions of increased plasma ANG II concentrations resulting from intravenous infusion of ANG II as well as during conditions of increased production of endogenous ANG II as a result of AT1 receptor blockade. Both infusion of ANG II at a rate of 30 ng/kg per min as well as oral pretreatment with losartan at a dose of 100 mg/kg nearly doubled plasma ANG II concentrations. Campbell et al10 recently reported a 4- to 6-fold increase in ANG II plasma levels 6 to 24 hours after intraarterial administration of 10 mg/kg losartan to Sprague-Dawley rats. The effect of losartan on plasma ANG II levels may be even more pronounced after long-term treatment, as indicated by a 25-fold increase in plasma ANG II after an 8-day IP administration of 10 mg losartan twice daily.10 Despite that the dose of 100 mg/kg losartan used in the present study is in the upper range for antihypertensive treatment in rats,18 the elevated blood pressure in SHRSP was markedly lowered but not normalized.
Both the effect of ANG II as well as the effect of losartan on aortic cGMP were blocked by AT2 receptor blockade with the selective AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319. This finding suggests that ANG II mediates its effects on vascular cGMP via stimulation of the AT2 receptor in the vascular wall. PD 123319 is highly selective with a Ki 
12 nmol/L for the AT2 receptor and Ki > 100 mol/L for the AT1 receptor.19,20 In the present study, the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 was used at a dose of 30 mg/kg applied as an IV bolus injection. In a recent study, bolus injections of PD 123319 at doses of 1 to 1000 g/kg followed by IV infusion of PD 123319 at concentrations of 1 to 1000 g/kg per min for 1 hour produced plasma concentrations of the compound that ranged from 0.1 mol/L (lowest dose) up to 10 mol/L (highest dose). Treatment of rats with PD 123319 for 10 to 14 days with PD 123319 at a dose of 30 mg/kg per day applied by osmotic minipumps resulted in plasma levels in the range of 90 to 250 nmol/L.21
Expression of AT2 receptors in rat aorta (Sprague-Dawley rats) has been demonstrated by Viswanathan et al22 by binding studies and quantitative autoradiography. Their results revealed a predominance of AT2 receptors in the aorta of fetus and young (2 weeks old) rats. In adult (8 weeks old) rats, approximately 30% of the receptors expressed in the aorta were AT2. This study also demonstrated that the number of ANG II receptors decreased with age, being 20 times lower in the adult rats compared with the fetus. The data suggested a localization of AT2 receptors throughout the aortic wall including the medial layer, although a localization of AT2 receptors to distinct cell types was not possible. Similar results were obtained by Song et al23 in WKY and SHR, Endothelial cells derived from coronary arteries of SHR express AT1 and AT2 receptors in a ratio of 80% to 20%.24 In rat aortic endothelial cells, Pueyo et al25 detected AT2 receptor expression in proliferating cells cultured without growth factors but not under normal culture conditions, that is in the presence of growth factors. These results confirm recent findings that growth factors downregulate AT2 receptor expression.26 Other studies failed to detect AT1 as well as AT2 receptors in endothelial cells derived from bovine aorta27 or porcine arteries.28 Thus, the demonstration of AT2 receptor expression may largely depend on the experimental conditions. In the present study, we have not directly proven the expression of AT2 receptor in the aorta. However, the fact that treatment with the specific AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 blocked the effects of ANG II alone and also the effects of the combination of ANG II and losartan on aortic cGMP content suggests the presence of AT2 receptors in the rat aorta under the conditions of our experiments.
The finding that losartan can stimulate NO production by an AT2 receptor-mediated and BK B2-dependent mechanism provides a direct explanation for results obtained in recent studies in SHRSP.6,7,9 In these studies, we treated SHRSP long-term with the ACE inhibitor ramipril as well as with the AT1 antagonist losartan (30 mg/kg per day) and determined the effect of treatment on cardiac function and metabolism in ex vivo isolated hearts and on vascular cGMP production. The results revealed that the ACE inhibitor improved cardiac function and metabolism and increased aortic cGMP content, the effect being completely abolished by concomitant blockade of BK B2 receptors.6,7 The BK B2 receptor antagonist icatibant did not affect aortic cGMP content after chronic application using the same dose as in the present acute study. On the other hand, the AT1 antagonist produced strikingly similar and, with regard to increases in aortic cGMP content, even more pronounced effects as the ACE inhibitor, suggesting a relationship between AT1 antagonism and the kinin/NO system.9
A number of recent studies have suggested the existence of a link between ANG II and the kinin/nitric oxide system in various organs including the blood vessel wall, possibly mediated by the AT2 receptor. An involvement of a non-AT1 receptor mechanism in the stimulation of guanylate cyclase in aortic tissue has been described previously.14 ANG II at a concentration of 25 nmol/L stimulated cGMP production in incubated aortic segments. This effect was not affected by the AT1 antagonist losartan but could be blocked by inhibition of soluble guanylate cyclase as well as by NO synthase inhibition with L-NAME.14 In bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAEC), ANG II (10-7 to 10-4 mol/L) dose-dependently stimulated cGMP production and enhanced the release of endogenous kinins.11,29 The effect of ANG II on cGMP was blocked by the BK B2 receptor antagonist icatibant (0.1 mol/L), as well as by the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine (10 mol/L). Furthermore, blockade of AT2 receptors with CGP 42112A at antagonistic concentrations and with PD 123177 inhibited the accumulation of cGMP induced by ANG II. Blockade of AT1 receptors with four different selective AT1 receptor antagonists had no or only minor inhibitory effects on ANG II-induced cGMP production. Although these results favor an involvement of the AT2 receptors in ANG II-induced endothelial BK/NO production, the nature of the ANG II receptor is challenged by the fact that the AT1 antagonist MSD L-158,809 behaved like an AT2 antagonist in this experimental setting.29
Several studies have demonstrated that the ANG II fragment ANG (1–7) can activate the kinin/NO system and potentiate the hypotensive effects of BK in rats.30,31 Furthermore, ANG (1–7) has been shown to dilate canine and porcine coronary arteries by a NO and BK B2 receptor dependent mechanism. The relaxation induced by ANG (1–7) was not affected by AT1 or AT2 receptor blockade.32,33 However, in one of these studies33 the effects of ANG (1–7) seemed to be produced by yet unknown contaminations of the ANG (1–7) batch provided by the manufacturer and were not confirmed with other ANG (1–7) batches.34
Seyedi et al13 recently demonstrated a NO production by measuring nitrite release of canine coronary microvessels and canine large coronary arteries in response to a number of ANG peptides including ANG II (10-5 mol/L) and ANG (1–7) (10-5 mol/L). The effects of the ANG peptides were blocked by an NO synthase inhibitor and a BK B2 receptor antagonist suggesting that the ANG-induced NO release was caused by an activation of local kinin production in the vessel wall. Curiously, this effect could not be ascribed to distinct ANG receptor subtypes, because it was blocked by AT1 as well as by AT2 receptor antagonists. Interestingly, a non-AT1, non-AT2 angiotensin receptor with a high affinity for ANG (1–7) has been described in BAEC.27 However, unlike in the present study, there is no significant competition of PD 123319 for the ANG (1–7) binding site in BAEC.27
In a microdialysis study, Siragy et al15 demonstrated an increased cGMP concentration in the renal interstitial fluid in rats on normal sodium diet after ANG II application. This effect was blocked by concomitant administration of the AT2 antagonist PD 123319. In this study, PD 123319 as well as losartan alone had no effect on renal interstitial fluid cGMP content. Furthermore, activation of the RAS by sodium depletion produced an increase in renal interstitial fluid cGMP. This effect was not changed by losartan treatment, whereas PD 123319 caused a decrease in cGMP content, suggesting that the effect was AT2 mediated.
In the present study, acute treatment with losartan at a dose of 100 mg/kg PO increased aortic cGMP content 4 hours after drug application. In contrast, in a renin-dependent model of hypertension, ie, in rats made hypertensive by coarctation of the aorta, losartan at a dose of 30 mg/kg IV did not change the cGMP content in the aorta 30 minutes after drug application.35 Differences in the hypertension model (aortic coarctation versus genetic hypertension) or the time point of tissue collection (0.5 hour versus 4 hours) may explain the differences between both studies.
The finding that stimulation of AT2 receptors produce NO generation in the vasculature suggests an involvement of AT2 receptors in basal blood pressure maintenance as well as a contribution of AT2 receptor stimulation to the antihypertensive actions of losartan. However, at least during acute conditions as in the present study, the AT2 antagonist PD 123319 did not alter basal blood pressure when compared to vehicle-treated controls. Furthermore, the blood pressure increase induced by ANG II was not further enhanced by concomitant AT2 receptor blockade, suggesting that the AT2 receptor mediated effect of ANG II on aortic NO production does not contribute to the overall blood pressure effect. Similar findings have been obtained by Levy et al36 in normal Wistar rats after 3 weeks of treatment with PD 123319 (30 mg/kg per day) alone or in combination with ANG II (120 ng/kg per min). In addition, in the present study, AT2 receptor blockade during coadministration of losartan and ANG II did not attenuate the antihypertensive action of losartan but, in contrast, tended to further decrease blood pressure in this group. However, several studies have suggested a depressor role of the AT2 receptor. In anesthetized rats, ANG II and ANG III elicit a biphasic arterial pressure response. Losartan pretreatment blocked the pressor part of the response to ANG II and ANG III, whereas the depressor response became larger. Combined blockade of AT1 and AT2 receptors abolished all responses to ANG II and ANG III. Although anesthesia might have influenced the outcome of this study, it suggested that the AT2 receptor can mediate a depressor response to ANG II.37
It can be argued that the effect of ANG II on aortic cGMP is secondary to the increase in blood pressure induced by ANG II, eg, by activation of counterregulatory active vasodilatory systems such as the kinin/NO system. However, marked reduction of blood pressure by either losartan or the arterial vasodilator minoxidil did not affect the ANG II induced increase in aortic cGMP. A second approach to exclude secondary effect of blood pressure was to infuse ANG II at a dose that did not alter basal blood pressure. However, this low dose also failed to produce a significant increase in plasma ANG II and, consequently, failed to stimulate aortic cGMP content.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that losartan interacts with the kinin/NO system by stimulation of AT2 receptors secondary to a losartan-induced increase in plasma ANG II concentrations. The effects of losartan on aortic cGMP were mimicked by intravenous ANG II infusion. The activation of AT2 receptors by ANG II resulted in a BK-dependent stimulation of aortic NO release with a subsequent generation of cGMP. These AT2 receptor-dependent actions of losartan or ANG II do not seem to interfere with the acute effects of both substances on blood pressure but may help to explain some of the beneficial actions of losartan on cardiovascular function and metabolism reported recently.
Received September 17, 1997; first decision October 21, 1997; accepted November 3, 1997.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Edling O, Gohlke P, Paul M, Rettig R, Stauss HM, Steckelings UM, Unger T. The renin-angiotensin system: physiology and pathophysiology. In: Schachter M, ed. ACE Inhibitors: Current Use and Future Prospects. Martin Duniz, London; 1995: 3 –41.
2. Timmermans PBMWM, Wong PC, Chiu AT, Herblin WF, Benfield P, Carini DJ, Lee RJ, Wexler RR, Saye JA, Smith RD. Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev. 1993; 45 : 205 –251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Unger T, Chung O, Cikos T, Culman J, Gallinat S, Gohlke P, Höhle S, Meffert S, Stoll M, Stroth U, Zhu YZ. Angiotensin receptors. J Hypertens. 1996; 14 (suppl 15): S95 –S103.
4. Griendling KK, Lassègue B, Alexander RW. Angiotensin receptors and their therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1997; 36 : 281 –306.
5. Linz W, Wiemer G, Gohlke P, Unger T, Schölkens BA. Contribution of kinins to the cardiovascular actions of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 1995; 47 : 25 –49.[Abstract]
6. Gohlke P, Lamberty V, Kuwer I, Bartenbach S, Schnell A, Linz W, Schölkens BA, Wiemer G, Unger T. Long-term low-dose angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment increases vascular cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate.
Hypertension. 1993;
22
: 682
–687.
7. Gohlke P, Linz W, Schölkens BA, Kuwer I, Bartenbach S, Schnell A, Unger T. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition improves cardiac function: role of bradykinin.
Hypertension. 1994;
23
: 411
–418.
8. Gohlke P, Kuwer I, Bartenbach S, Schnell A, Unger T. Effect of low-dose treatment with perindopril on cardiac function in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats: role of bradykinin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994; 24 : 462 –469.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Gohlke P, Linz W, Schölkens BA, Wiemer G, Unger T. Cardiac and vascular effects of long-term losartan treatment in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1996;
28
: 397
–402.
10. Campbell DJ, Kladis A, Valentijn AJ. Effects of losartan on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides and angiotensin-converting enzyme. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995; 26 : 233 –240.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Wiemer G, Schölkens BA, Busse R, Wagner A, Heitsch H, Linz W. The functional role of angiotensin II—subtype AT2—receptors in endothelial cells and isolated ischemic rat hearts. Pharm Pharmacol Lett. 1993; 3 : 24 –27.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Boulanger CM, Caputo L, Lèvy BI. Endothelial AT1-mediated release of nitric oxide decreases angiotensin II contractions in rat carotid artery.
Hypertension. 1995;
26
: 752
–757.
13. Seyedi N, Xu XB, Nasjiletti A, Hintze TH. Coronary kinin generation mediates nitric oxide release after angiotensin receptor stimulation.
Hypertension. 1995;
26
: 164
–170.
14. Munzenmaier DH, Greene AS. Stimulation of soluble guanylate cyclase activity by angiotensin II is mediated by a non-AT1 receptor mechanism in rat aorta. FASEB J. 1994; 8 :A 367 . Abstract 2124.
15. Siragy HM, Carey RM. The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptormediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97 : 1978 –1982.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Liu YH, Yand XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Sabbah HN, Peterson E, Carretero OA. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99 : 1926 –1935.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Admiraal PJJ, Derkx FHM, Danser AHJ, Pieterman H, Schalekamp MADH. Metabolism and production of angiotensin I in different vascular beds in subjects with hypertension.
Hypertension. 1990;
15
: 44
–55.
18. Wong PC, Price WA, Chiu AT, Duncia JV, Carini DJ, Wexler RR, Johnson AL, Timmermans PBMWM. Hypotensive action of DuP 753, an angiotensin II antagonist, in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1990;
15
: 459
–468.
19. Macari D, Whitebread S, Cumin F, De Gasparo M, Levens N. Renal actions of the angiotensin AT2 receptor ligands CGP 42112 and PD 123319 after blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994; 259 : 27 –36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Gasparo M, Husain A, Alexander W, Catt KJ, Chiu AT, Frew M, Good-friend T, Harding JW, Inagami T, Timmermans PBMWM. Proposed update of angiotensin receptor nomenclature.
Hypertension. 1995;
25
: 924
–927.
21. Keiser JA, Major TC, Lu GH, Davis LS, Panek RL. Is there a functional cardiovascular role for AT2 receptors. Drug Dev Res. 1993; 29 : 94 –99.
22. Viswanathan M, Tsutsumi K, Correa FMA, Saavedra JM. Changes in expression of angiotensin receptor subtypes in the rat aorta during development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 179 : 1361 –1367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Song K, Kurobe Y, Kanehara H, Wada T, Inada Y, Nishikawa K, Miyazaki M. Mapping of angiotensin II receptor subtypes in peripheral tissues of spontaneously hypertensive rats by in vitro autoradiography. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1995; (suppl 1): S17 –S19.
24. Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95 : 651 –657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Pueyo ME, N’Diane N, Michel JB. Angiotensin II-elicited signal transduction via AT1 receptors in endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1996; 118 : 79 –84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Kambayashi Y, Bardhan S, Inagami T. Peptide growth factor markedly decrease the ligand binding of angiotensin II type 2 receptor in rat cultured vascular smooth muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993; 194 : 478 –482.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Tallant EA, Lu X, Weiss RB, Chappell MC, Ferrario CM. Bovine aortic endothelial cells contain an angiotensin-(1–7) receptor.
Hypertension. 1997;
29
(part 2): 388
–393.
28. Mineo C, Shimizu H, Takada K-I, Imanaka Z, Takano T. Angiotensin II binding activity in cultured porcine arterial endothelial cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 1994; 48 : 1993 –1995.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Korth P, Fink E, Linz W, Schölkens BA, Wohlfart P, Wiemer G. Angiotensin II receptor subtype-stimulated formation of endothelial cyclic GMP and prostacyclin is accompanied by an enhanced release of endogenous kinins. Pharm Pharmacol Lett. 1995; 3 : 124 –127.
30. Paula RD, Lima CV, Khosla M, Santos RAS. Angiotensin-(1–7) potentiates the hypotensive effect of bradykinin in conscious rats.
Hypertension. 1995;
26
(part 2): 1154
–1159.
31. Abbas A, Gorelik G, Carbini LA, Scicli AG. Angiotensin-(1–7) induces bradykinin-mediated hypotensive responses in anesthetized rats.
Hypertension. 1997;
30
(part 1): 217
–221.
32. Brosnihan KB, Li P, Ferrario CM. Angiotensin-(1–7) dilates canine coronary arteries through kinins and nitric oxide.
Hypertension. 1996;
27
(part 2): 523
–528.
33. Pörsti I, Bara AT, Busse R, Hecker M. Release of nitric oxide by angiotensin-(1–7) from porcine coronary endothelium: implications for a novel angiotensin receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1994; 111 : 652 –654.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Pörsti I, Bara AT, Busse R, Hecker M. Corrigendum: Release of nitric oxide by angiotensin-(1–7) from porcine coronary endothelium: implications for a novel angiotensin receptor. Br J Pharmacol. 1996; 117 : 231 .
35. Guan H, Cachofeiro V, Pucci ML, Kaminski PM, Wolin MS, Nasjletti A. Nitric oxide and the depressor response to angiotensin blockade in hypertension.
Hypertension. 1996;
27
: 19
–24.
36. Levy BI, Benessiano J, Henrion D, Caputo L, Heymes C, Duriez M, Poitevin P, Samuel JS. Chronic blockade of AT2-subtype receptors prevents the effect of angiotensin II on the rat vascular structure. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98 : 418 –425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Scheuer DA, Perrone MH. Angiotensin type 2 receptors mediate depressor phase of biphasic pressure response to angiotensin. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264 : R917 –R923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  F. S. Ramalho, I. Alfany-Fernandez, A. Casillas-Ramirez, M. Massip-Salcedo, A. Serafin, A. Rimola, V. Arroyo, J. Rodes, J. Rosello-Catafau, and C. Peralta Are Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists Useful Strategies in Steatotic and Nonsteatotic Livers in Conditions of Partial Hepatectomy under Ischemia-Reperfusion? J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2009; 329(1): 130 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. K. Sampson, K. M. Moritz, E. S. Jones, R. L. Flower, R. E. Widdop, and K. M. Denton Enhanced Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Mechanisms Mediate Decreases in Arterial Pressure Attributable to Chronic Low-Dose Angiotensin II in Female Rats Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 666 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. Lee, S. Xia, and L. Ragolia Upregulation of AT2 receptor and iNOS impairs angiotensin II-induced contraction without endothelium influence in young normotensive diabetic rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): R144 - R154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E Johansson, B. Fagerberg, and G. Bergstrom Angiotensin type 2 receptor is expressed in human atherosclerotic lesions Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2008; 9(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Li, T. Kondo, Y. Numaguchi, K. Kobayashi, M. Aoki, N. Inoue, K. Okumura, and T. Murohara Role of Bradykinin, Nitric Oxide, and Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Imidapril-Induced Angiogenesis Hypertension, February 1, 2008; 51(2): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Isbell, S. Voros, Z. Yang, J. M. DiMaria, S. S. Berr, B. A. French, F. H. Epstein, S. P. Bishop, H. Wang, R. J. Roy, et al. Interaction between bradykinin subtype 2 and angiotensin II type 2 receptors during post-MI left ventricular remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3372 - H3378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Kai Chen, D. C. Merrill, and J. C. Rose The Importance of Angiotensin II Subtype Receptors for Blood Pressure Control During Mouse Pregnancy Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2007; 14(7): 694 - 704. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Messadi-Laribi, V. Griol-Charhbili, A. Pizard, M.-P. Vincent, D. Heudes, P. Meneton, F. Alhenc-Gelas, and C. Richer Tissue Kallikrein Is Involved in the Cardioprotective Effect of AT1-Receptor Blockade in Acute Myocardial Ischemia J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. C. Munk, L. Sanchez de Miguel, M. Petrimpol, N. Butz, A. Banfi, U. Eriksson, L. Hein, R. Humar, and E. J. Battegay Angiotensin II Induces Angiogenesis in the Hypoxic Adult Mouse Heart In Vitro Through an AT2-B2 Receptor Pathway Hypertension, May 1, 2007; 49(5): 1178 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. LeFebvre, A. Shintani, T. Gebretsadik, J. R. Petro, L. J. Murphey, and N. J. Brown Bradykinin B2 Receptor Does Not Contribute to Blood Pressure Lowering during AT1 Receptor Blockade J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2007; 320(3): 1261 - 1267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Juhlin, L. R. Erhardt, H. Ottosson, B. A.G. Jonsson, and P. Hoglund Treatments with losartan or enalapril are equally sensitive to deterioration in renal function from cyclooxygenase inhibition Eur J Heart Fail, February 1, 2007; 9(2): 191 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Jankowski, R. Vanholder, M. van der Giet, M. Tolle, S. Karadogan, J. Gobom, J. Furkert, A. Oksche, E. Krause, T. N. Anh Tran, et al. Mass-Spectrometric Identification of a Novel Angiotensin Peptide in Human Plasma Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2007; 27(2): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Savoia, R. M. Touyz, M. Volpe, and E. L. Schiffrin Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor in Resistance Arteries of Type 2 Diabetic Hypertensive Patients Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 341 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. J. Salomone, N. L. Howell, H. E. McGrath, B. A. Kemp, S. R. Keller, J. J. Gildea, R. A. Felder, and R. M. Carey Intrarenal Dopamine D1-Like Receptor Stimulation Induces Natriuresis via an Angiotensin Type-2 Receptor Mechanism Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): 155 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Paul, A. Poyan Mehr, and R. Kreutz Physiology of local Renin-Angiotensin systems. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 747 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. H. Goossens, S. E. McQuaid, A. L. Dennis, M. A. van Baak, E. E. Blaak, K. N. Frayn, W. H. M. Saris, and F. Karpe Angiotensin II: a major regulator of subcutaneous adipose tissue blood flow in humans J. Physiol., March 1, 2006; 571(2): 451 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Warnecke, P. Mugrauer, D. Surder, J. Erdmann, C. Schubert, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Intronic ANG II type 2 receptor gene polymorphism 1675 G/A modulates receptor protein expression but not mRNA splicing Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2005; 289(6): R1729 - R1735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Fossum, A. Moan, S. E. Kjeldsen, R. B. Devereux, S. Julius, S. M. Snapinn, J. M. Edelman, U. de Faire, F. Fyhrquist, H. Ibsen, et al. The Effect of Losartan Versus Atenolol on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With Hypertension Taking Aspirin: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 6, 2005; 46(5): 770 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Duke, R. G. Evans, and R. E Widdop AT2 receptors contribute to acute blood pressure-lowering and vasodilator effects of AT1 receptor antagonism in conscious normotensive but not hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2289 - H2297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. E. Walters, T. A. Gaspari, and R. E. Widdop Angiotensin-(1-7) Acts as a Vasodepressor Agent Via Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors in Conscious Rats Hypertension, May 1, 2005; 45(5): 960 - 966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Gonzalez, L. Lobos, F. Castillo, L. Galleguillos, N. C. Lopez, and L. Michea High-Salt Diet Inhibits Expression of Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor in Resistance Arteries Hypertension, May 1, 2005; 45(5): 853 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. P. Forder, D. H. Munzenmaier, and A. S. Greene Angiogenic protection from focal ischemia with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade in the rat Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1989 - H1996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. You, L. Loufrani, C. Baron, B. I. Levy, R. E. Widdop, and D. Henrion High Blood Pressure Reduction Reverses Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Vasoconstriction Into Vasodilation in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Circulation, March 1, 2005; 111(8): 1006 - 1011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Somoza, M. C. Gonzalez, J. M. Gonzalez, F. Abderrahim, S. M. Arribas, and M. S. Fernandez-Alfonso Modulatory role of the adventitia on noradrenaline and angiotensin II responses: Role of endothelium and AT2 receptors Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2005; 65(2): 478 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Vazquez, I. Coronel, R. Bautista, E. Romo, C. M. Villalon, M. C. Avila-Casado, V. Soto, and B. Escalante Angiotensin II-dependent induction of AT2 receptor expression after renal ablation Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): F207 - F213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Gironacci, M. S. Valera, I. Yujnovsky, and C. Pena Angiotensin-(1-7) Inhibitory Mechanism of Norepinephrine Release in Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, November 1, 2004; 44(5): 783 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. A Voors, P. P van Geel, M. Oosterga, H. Buikema, D. J van Veldhuisen, and W. H van Gilst Vascular effects of quinapril completely depend on ACE insertion/deletion polymorphism Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, September 1, 2004; 5(3): 130 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Bergaya, R. H.P. Hilgers, P. Meneton, Y. Dong, M. Bloch-Faure, T. Inagami, F. Alhenc-Gelas, B. I. Levy, and C. M. Boulanger Flow-Dependent Dilation Mediated by Endogenous Kinins Requires Angiotensin AT2 Receptors Circ. Res., June 25, 2004; 94(12): 1623 - 1629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Johren, A. Dendorfer, and P. Dominiak Cardiovascular and renal function of angiotensin II type-2 receptors Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2004; 62(3): 460 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Hiyoshi, K. Yayama, M. Takano, and H. Okamoto Stimulation of Cyclic GMP Production via AT2 and B2 Receptors in the Pressure-Overloaded Aorta After Banding Hypertension, June 1, 2004; 43(6): 1258 - 1263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. W. Batenburg, I. M. Garrelds, C. C. Bernasconi, L. Juillerat-Jeanneret, J. P. van Kats, P. R. Saxena, and A.H. J. Danser Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Vasodilation in Human Coronary Microarteries Circulation, May 18, 2004; 109(19): 2296 - 2301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. B. Ahmed, A. K. Kang, K. D. Burns, C. R. J. Kennedy, V. Lai, D. C. Cattran, J. W. Scholey, and J. A. Miller Effects of Oral Contraceptive Use on the Renal and Systemic Vascular Response to Angiotensin II Infusion J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2004; 15(3): 780 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Bove, Z. Yang, W. D. Gilson, F. H. Epstein, B. A. French, S. S. Berr, S. P. Bishop, H. Matsubara, R. M. Carey, and C. M. Kramer Nitric Oxide Mediates Benefits of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Overexpression During Post-Infarct Remodeling Hypertension, March 1, 2004; 43(3): 680 - 685. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Tschope, F. Spillmann, C. Altmann, M. Koch, D. Westermann, N. Dhayat, S. Dhayat, J.-L. Bascands, L. Gera, S. Hoffmann, et al. The bradykinin B1 receptor contributes to the cardioprotective effects of AT1 blockade after experimental myocardial infarction Cardiovasc Res, February 15, 2004; 61(3): 559 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Shariat-Madar and A. H. Schmaier Review: The plasma kallikrein/kinin and renin angiotensin systems in blood pressure regulation in sepsis Innate Immunity, February 1, 2004; 10(1): 3 - 13. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Yayama, M. Horii, H. Hiyoshi, M. Takano, H. Okamoto, S. Kagota, and M. Kunitomo Up-Regulation of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Rat Thoracic Aorta by Pressure-Overload J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 736 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Kumar, V. Menon, W. R. Ford, A. S. Clanachan, and B. I. Jugdutt Effect of Angiotensin II lype 2 Receptor Blockade on Activation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases after Ischemia-Reperfusion in Isolated Working Rat Hearts Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, December 1, 2003; 8(4): 285 - 296. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Thai, J. Wollmuth, S. Goldman, and M. Gaballa Angiotensin Subtype 1 Receptor (AT1) Blockade Improves Vasorelaxation in Heart Failure by Up-Regulation of Endothelial Nitric-Oxide Synthase via Activation of the AT2 Receptor J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., December 1, 2003; 307(3): 1171 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. M. Abadir, R. M. Carey, and H. M. Siragy Angiotensin AT2 Receptors Directly Stimulate Renal Nitric Oxide in Bradykinin B2-Receptor-Null Mice Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 600 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I. Jugdutt and V. Menon Upregulation of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor and Limitation of Myocardial Stunning by Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers during Reperfused Myocardial Infarction in the Rat Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2003; 8(3): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H. Schmaier The kallikrein-kinin and the renin-angiotensin systems have a multilayered interaction Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R1 - R13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. K Irons and A. Kumar Valsartan-Induced Angioedema Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2003; 37(7): 1024 - 1027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Itoh, J. Kajikuri, T. Tada, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Mabuchi Angiotensin II-induced modulation of endothelium-dependent relaxation in rabbit mesenteric resistance arteries J. Physiol., May 1, 2003; 548(3): 893 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Hornig, C. Kohler, D. Schlink, H. Tatge, and H. Drexler AT1-Receptor Antagonism Improves Endothelial Function in Coronary Artery Disease by a Bradykinin/B2-Receptor-Dependent Mechanism Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1092 - 1095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Matsumoto, K. Minai, H. Horie, N. Ohira, H. Takashima, Y. Tarutani, Y. o Yasuda, T. Ozawa, S. Matsuo, M. Kinoshita, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition but not angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism augments coronary release of tissue plasminogen activator in hypertensive patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 16, 2003; 41(8): 1373 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Gavras and H. Gavras Are Patients Who Develop Angioedema With ACE Inhibition at Risk of the Same Problem With AT1 Receptor Blockers? Arch Intern Med, January 27, 2003; 163(2): 240 - 241. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Nakamura, D. B. Averill, M. C. Chappell, D. I. Diz, K. B. Brosnihan, and C. M. Ferrario Angiotensin receptors contribute to blood pressure homeostasis in salt-depleted SHR Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): R164 - R173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Yan, D. Kim, T. Aizawa, and B. C. Berk Functional Interplay Between Angiotensin II and Nitric Oxide: Cyclic GMP as a Key Mediator Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2003; 23(1): 26 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. De Caterina and C. Manes Inflammation in early atherogenesis: impact of ACE inhibition Eur. Heart J. Suppl., January 1, 2003; 5(suppl_A): A15 - A24. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Murphey, D. Vaughan, and N. Brown Contribution of bradykinin to the cardioprotective effects of ACE inhibitors Eur. Heart J. Suppl., January 1, 2003; 5(suppl_A): A37 - A41. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kurisu, R. Ozono, T. Oshima, M. Kambe, T. Ishida, H. Sugino, H. Matsuura, K. Chayama, Y. Teranishi, O. Iba, et al. Cardiac Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Activates the Kinin/NO System and Inhibits Fibrosis Hypertension, January 1, 2003; 41(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Cai, Z. Li, S. Dikalov, S. M. Holland, J. Hwang, H. Jo, S. C. Dudley Jr., and D. G. Harrison NAD(P)H Oxidase-derived Hydrogen Peroxide Mediates Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production in Response to Angiotensin II J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48311 - 48317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. F. de Godoy and A. M. de Oliveira Cross-Talk Between AT1 and AT2 Angiotensin Receptors in Rat Anococcygeus Smooth Muscle J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2002; 303(1): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. Widdop, K. Matrougui, B. I. Levy, and D. Henrion AT2 Receptor-Mediated Relaxation Is Preserved After Long-Term AT1 Receptor Blockade Hypertension, October 1, 2002; 40(4): 516 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-C. Wei, C. M. Ferrario, K. B. Brosnihan, D. M. Farrell, W. E. Bradley, A. A. Jaffa, and L. J. Dell'Italia Angiotensin Peptides Modulate Bradykinin Levels in the Interstitium of the Dog Heart in Vivo J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2002; 300(1): 324 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Uhlenius, O. Vuolteenaho, and I. Tikkanen Renin-angiotensin blockade improves renal cGMP production via non-AT2-receptor mediated mechanisms in hypertension-induced by chronic NOS inhibition in rat Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2001; 2(4): 233 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Berry, R. Touyz, A. F. Dominiczak, R. C. Webb, and D. G. Johns Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2337 - H2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Henrion, N. Kubis, and B. I. Levy Physiological and Pathophysiological Functions of the AT2 Subtype Receptor of Angiotensin II: From Large Arteries to the Microcirculation Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1150 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.-p. Sun, B.-q. Zhu, A. E. M. Browne, S. Pulukurthy, T. M. Chou, K. Sudhir, S. A. Glantz, P. C. Deedwania, K. Chatterjee, and W. W. Parmley Comparative Effects of ACE Inhibitors and an Angiotensin Receptor Blocker on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Function Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, June 1, 2001; 6(2): 175 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I Jugdutt and M. Balghith Enhanced regional AT2-receptor and PKC{varepsilon} expression during cardioprotection induced by AT1-receptor blockade after reperfused myocardial infarction Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2001; 2(2): 134 - 140. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Johansson, M. Holm, S. Ewert, A. Casselbrant, A. Pettersson, and L. Fandriks Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-mediated duodenal mucosal alkaline secretion in the rat Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): G1254 - G1260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Unger Pharmacological properties of angiotensin II antagonists: examining all the therapeutic implications Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2001; 2(2_suppl): S4 - S7. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Varagic, D. Susic, and E. D. Frohlich Coronary Hemodynamic and Ventricular Responses to Angiotensin Type 1 Receptor Inhibition in SHR : Interaction With Angiotensin Type 2 Receptors Hypertension, June 1, 2001; 37(6): 1399 - 1403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Bravo, B. Somoza, M. Ruiz-Gayo, C. Gonzalez, L. M. Ruilope, and M. S. Fernandez-Alfonso Differential Effect of Chronic Antihypertensive Treatment on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, May 1, 2001; e10(5): . [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I Jugdutt, Yi Xu, M. Balghith, and V. Menon Cardioprotective effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with candesartan after reperfused myocardial infarction: role of angiotensin II type 2 receptor Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2001; 2(1_suppl): S162 - S166. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Hornig, U. Landmesser, C. Kohler, D. Ahlersmann, S. Spiekermann, A. Christoph, H. Tatge, and H. Drexler Comparative Effect of ACE Inhibition and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antagonism on Bioavailability of Nitric Oxide in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease : Role of Superoxide Dismutase Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 799 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. E. Schmieder, J. Erdmann, C. Delles, J. Jacobi, E. Fleck, K. Hilgers, and V. Regitz-Zagrosek Effect of the angiotensin II type 2-receptor gene (+1675 G/A) on left ventricular structure in humans J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 175 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Lauth, M. Cattaruzza, and M. Hecker ACE Inhibitor and AT1 Antagonist Blockade of Deformation-Induced Gene Expression in the Rabbit Jugular Vein Through B2 Receptor Activation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Nickenig, A. Stablein, S. Wassmann, C. Wyen, C. Muller, and M. Bohm Acute effects of ACE inhibition on coronary endothelial dysfunction Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2000; 1(4): 361 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. Olivares-Reyes, S. Jayadev, L. Hunyady, K. J. Catt, and R. D. Smith Homologous and Heterologous Phosphorylation of the AT2 Angiotensin Receptor by Protein Kinase C Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2000; 58(5): 1156 - 1161. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. C. DE GRACIA, A. OSUNA, F. O'VALLE, R. G. DEL MORAL, R. WANGENSTEEN, C. G. DEL RIO, and F. VARGAS Deoxycorticosterone Suppresses the Effects of Losartan in Nitric Oxide--Deficient Hypertensive Rats J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2000; 11(11): 1995 - 2000. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Xu, A. S. Clanachan, and B. I. Jugdutt Enhanced Expression of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor, Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor, and Protein Kinase C{epsilon} During Cardioprotection Induced by Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockade Hypertension, October 1, 2000; 36(4): 506 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. D. Croft, J. C. McGiff, A. Sanchez-Mendoza, and M. A. Carroll Angiotensin II releases 20-HETE from rat renal microvessels Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): F544 - F551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Kraiczi, J. Hedner, Y. Peker, and J. Carlson Increased vasoconstrictor sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2000; 89(2): 493 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Bishop, L. A. Kiernan, H. E. Montgomery, P. Gohlke, and J. R. McEwan Raised blood pressure, not renin-angiotensin systems, causes cardiac fibrosis in TGR m(Ren2)27 rats Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2000; 47(1): 57 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. d. Gasparo, P. Hess, B. Nuesslein-Hildesheim, P. Bruneval, and J.-P. Clozel Combination of non-hypotensive doses of valsartan and enalapril improves survival of spontaneously hypertensive rats with endothelial dysfunction Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2000; 1(2): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Nunez, J. Gomez, L. R. Zalba, M. Monton, A. Jimenez, S. Velasco, A. Lopez-Blaya, A. Celdran Uriarte, S. Casado, and A. Lopez-Farre Losartan inhibits in vitro platelet activation: comparison with candesartan and valsartan Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2000; 1(2): 175 - 179. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yi Xu, V. Menon, and B. I Jugdutt Cardioprotection after angiotensin II type 1 blockade involves angiotensin II type 2 receptor expression and activation of protein kinase C-{varepsilon} in acutely reperfused myocardial infarction in the dog: Effect of UP269-6 and losartan on AT1- and AT2-receptor expression and IP3 receptor and PKC{varepsilon} proteins Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2000; 1(2): 184 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Linz, H. Heitsch, B. A. Scholkens, and G. Wiemer Long-Term Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockade With Fonsartan Doubles Lifespan of Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 908 - 913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schachter ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor antagonists and bradykinin Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2000; 1(1): 27 - 29. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Gallinat, S. Busche, M. K. Raizada, and C. Sumners The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, March 1, 2000; 278(3): E357 - E374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D.J. van Veldhuisen and A.A. Voors Blockade of the renin angiotensin system in heart failure: the potential place of angiotensin II receptor blockers Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 14 - 16. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. I. Jugdutt, Yi Xu, M. Balghith, R. Moudgil, and V. Menon Cardioprotection Induced by AT1R Blockade After Reperfused Myocardial Infarction: Association With Regional Increase in AT2R, IP3R and PKC{varepsilon} Proteins and cGMP Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, January 1, 2000; 5(4): 301 - 311. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. M. Carey, Z.-Q. Wang, and H. M. Siragy Role of the Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor in the Regulation of Blood Pressure and Renal Function Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. MATSUDA, K. HAYASHI, K. ARAKAWA, M. NAITOH, E. KUBOTA, M. HONDA, A. MATSUMOTO, H. SUZUKI, T. YAMAMOTO, F. KAJIYA, et al. Zonal Heterogeneity in Action of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor on Renal Microcirculation: Role of Intrarenal Bradykinin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 1999; 10(11): 2272 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. N. Barber, D. B. Sampey, and R. E. Widdop AT2 Receptor Stimulation Enhances Antihypertensive Effect of AT1 Receptor Antagonist in Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1112 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Matrougui, L. Loufrani, C. Heymes, B. I. Levy, and D. Henrion Activation of AT2 Receptors by Endogenous Angiotensin II Is Involved in Flow-Induced Dilation in Rat Resistance Arteries Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 659 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. C Wollert and H. Drexler The renin-angiotensin system and experimental heart failure Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 1999; 43(4): 838 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Linz, P. Wohlfart, B. A Scholkens, T. Malinski, and G. Wiemer Interactions among ACE, kinins and NO Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 1999; 43(3): 549 - 561. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. M. Siragy, T. Inagami, T. Ichiki, and R. M. Carey Sustained hypersensitivity to angiotensin II and its mechanism in mice lacking the subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor PNAS, May 25, 1999; 96(11): 6506 - 6510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Siragy and R. M. Carey Protective Role of the Angiotensin AT2 Receptor in a Renal Wrap Hypertension Model Hypertension, May 1, 1999; 33(5): 1237 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Horiuchi, M. Akishita, and V. J. Dzau Recent Progress in Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Research in the Cardiovascular System Hypertension, February 1, 1999; 33(2): 613 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. H. Anderson, A. M. Devlin, D. Graham, J. J. Morton, C. A. Hamilton, J. L. Reid, N. J. Schork, and A. F. Dominiczak Telemetry for Cardiovascular Monitoring in a Pharmacological Study : New Approaches to Data Analysis Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 248 - 255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Matsubara Pathophysiological Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Cardiovascular and Renal Diseases Circ. Res., December 14, 1998; 83(12): 1182 - 1191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||