Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;31:415-420

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garvin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garvin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H.

(Hypertension. 1998;31:415.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Response of Proximal Tubules to Angiotensin II Changes During Maturation

Jeffrey L. Garvin; William H. Beierwaltes

From the Division of Hypertension and Vascular Research, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich.

Correspondence to Jeffrey L. Garvin, Division of Hypertension and Vascular Research, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The renin-angiotensin system changes with age, but it is unclear how renal responses to angiotensin II (Ang II) evolve as an animal matures. We hypothesized that Ang II exerts a greater effect on proximal nephron volume absorption (Jv), blood pressure (BP), renal blood flow (RBF), and renal vascular resistance (RVR) in young compared with adult rats. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of Ang II on proximal nephron fluid absorption in response to 10-10 mol/L Ang II in rats from three age groups: young (4 to 5 weeks old), intermediate (6 weeks old), and adult (7 weeks old). In proximal straight tubules from 7 young rats, Jv was 0.64±0.05 nL/mm per minute. Ang II in the bath increased Jv by 69±18% to 1.05±0.07 nL/mm per minute (P<.005). In tubules from five intermediate-aged rats, Jv was 0.60±0.10 nL/mm per minute and increased by 34±5% to 0.83±0.16 nL/mm per minute after Ang II (P<.02). In five adult rats, Jv was 0.69±0.06 nL/mm per minute and increased 20±6% to 0.85±0.13 nL/mm per minute after Ang II (P<.05). Next we tested whether the exaggerated effect of Ang II on proximal tubular Jv in young rats was due to Ang II-induced changes in cAMP. cAMP content of proximal tubules from eight young rats was 24.8±7.6 fmol/mm and fell by 29.7±9.8% (P<.025) after treatment with Ang II. In contrast, cAMP content of proximal tubules from nine adults was only 9.8±4.5 fmol/mm, 40% of baseline in young rats, and was unchanged by Ang II (9.2±4.5 fmol/mm). We finally determined whether the increased sensitivity to Ang II in tubules of young rats is mimicked by renal hemodynamics. Eleven adult rats had BP of 115±5 mm Hg, RBF of 6.99±0.42 mL/min per g kidney weight (kw), RVR of 16.82±0.95 mm Hg/mL per minute per g kw (resistance units), and plasma renin activity (PRA) of 11.2±2.3 ng Ang I/mL per hour. Seven young rats had BP of 98±7 mm Hg, 17 mm Hg lower than adults (P<.025). RBF was 4.94±0.23 mL/min per g kw, and RVR was 20.30±1.19 RU. 20% greater than in adults (P<.025). PRA was 9.2±2.2 ng Ang I/mL per hour. There were no differences between groups with regard to increased BP, decreased RBF, or increased RVR with graded doses of 8, 40, and 200 fmol Ang II/g body weight. Thus, Ang II increased Jv more in young rats but had a lesser effect in adults. This was coupled with a greater effect of Ang II on tubular cAMP in young rats, but no differences in systemic or renal hemodynamic responses to Ang II between adults and young. We conclude that during adolescent development, Ang II may be an important factor in the regulation of salt and water metabolism, but not renal hemodynamics.


Key Words: cAMP • renal blood flow • blood pressure • transport • sodium excretion

Abbreviations: Ang I, II = angiotensin I, II • BP = blood pressure • bw = body weight • Jv fluid absorption • kw = kidney weight • PRA = plasma renin activity • RBF = renal blood flow • RU = resistance units normalized to kidney weight • RVR = renal vascular resistance


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Renin is a circulating enzyme that acts as the rate-limiting step in the formation of the potent vasoconstrictor Ang II. Renin is secreted primarily from the juxtaglomerular cells of the renal afferent arteriole in response to various stimuli1 to regulate the formation of angiotensin. Besides its effects on total peripheral resistance and organ perfusion, Ang II stimulates sodium retention via direct actions within the kidney on the resistance vessels and proximal tubule and also via indirect actions through the release of aldosterone, which acts on the distal nephron.2 Angiotensin appears to play a critical role in the development of the kidney. At birth, PRA in the rat is approximately 50 ng Ang I/mL per hour and continues to increase to a peak of 75 ng Ang I/mL per hour by 2 weeks of age. After this zenith, the PRA declines to a steady state of only about 10% of the previous peak (7 ng Ang I/mL per hour) by 4 weeks of age. Whereas the circulating renin peaks early, the tissue renal renin does not peak until 3 to 4 weeks of age and declines to a constant level by 6 weeks.3 These dramatic changes suggest that Ang II may play a significant role in late renal development in the neonate.

Although age-related changes in the renin-angiotensin system have been studies extensively, such investigations have primarily focused on the dramatic changes that occur during fetal development,3–6 or alternatively, those that occur with old age.4 Perhaps because circulating renin levels stabilize during the rapid growth phase associated with adolescence (4 to 12 weeks of age in the rat), the influence of angiotensin on renal function during this period has largely been ignored. Although PRA does not change during adolescent development, this does not necessarily mean that changes in (or responses to) Ang II do not change. For instance, the quantity and types of Ang II receptors expressed in the kidney change with age,1 and young animals show a smaller increase in urinary volume and sodium excretion after volume expansion than do adult rats.5 This is proposed to be due to an exaggerated response of the kidney to Ang II, perhaps the result of stimulation of nephron sodium absorption by Ang II.

To our knowledge, no one has yet investigated the separate roles of Ang II-induced stimulation of transport and vasoconstriction in Ang II-dependent enhanced sodium retention during rapid growth and maturation. We hypothesized that Ang II would elicit more profound responses from renal resistance vessels and proximal tubules from young rats than those from adult rats.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Young and adult male rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). For the in vitro studies, we used adult male rats supplied to us as 7 weeks old, which weighed approximately 165 g. These were compared with young male rats weighing approximately 105 to 115 g, supplied to us as 4 to 5 weeks old, and (in the first protocol, perfusion studies) with an intermediateaged group supplied to us as 6 weeks old, weighing 140 g. In our in vitro studies we were limited in the upper age/size of rats that we could use because our success rate of dissecting a perfusable tubule from rats weighing more than 180 g is less than 10%. For our in vivo studies we used adult male rats supplied to us as 8 weeks old, weighing approximately 250 g. These were compared with young rats supplied to us as 5 weeks old, which weighed 110 to 115 g. Rats were cared for according to institutional guidelines, and all procedures had been approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Tubule Perfusion
Rats maintained on a 0.22% Na and 1.1% K diet (Ralston Purina) for 6 to 10 days were anesthetized with ketamine (100 mg/kg bw; Parke Davis), and the peritoneal cavity was opened via a midline incision. Ice-cold isotonic saline was poured over the left kidney while it was still perfused with blood, after which the kidney was removed. Sagittal sections were cut and placed in tubular perfusion solution on ice. Medullary rays were dissected from the slices, and individual proximal straight tubules were dissected from the rays. Tubules were perfused as described previously.7–9 The composition of the tubular perfusion solution (in mmol/L) was: NaCl 114.0, KCl 4.0, NaH2PO4 2.5, MgSO4 1.2, Na3 citrate 1.0, NaHCO3 25.0 alanine 6.0, Ca lactate2 2.0, glucose 5.5, and raffinose 5.0. The osmolarity of all solutions was 295±3 mOsm as measured by freezing-point depression. The pH of the bath was 7.4. Solutions were gassed with 95% O2-5% CO2. Ang II (10-10 mol/L) was added to the bath as indicated in the text.

Jv was measured using raffinose as a volume marker. Raffinose was measured in the perfusate and collected fluid using a previously described enzymatic assay with continuous-flow ultramicrofluorometer.10 The perfusion rate (Vo) was calculated from the equation: where CL is the concentration of raffinose in the collected fluid, Co is the concentration of raffinose in the perfused fluid, and VL is the collection rate per unit of tubule length. The rate of Jv was calculated from the equation:

Angiotensin and Proximal Nephron Fluid Absorption
Because it has been postulated that proximal tubules of young animals reabsorb sodium more avidly than those of adult rats,5 we first examined the effect of 10-10 mol/L Ang II on proximal nephron fluid absorption in three successive age groups: young, intermediate, and adult. Using the perfusion methods outlined above, we compared effects on Jv in proximal tubules by adding Ang II to the bath versus an untreated control period. We chose this concentration because it stimulates fluid absorption in isolated, perfused proximal tubules, and Ang II has been reported to stimulate transport in this segment in vivo.

Tubule Suspensions
Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with 0.1 mL of heparin (1000 USP/mL) and then anesthetized with ketamine (0.1 mg/kg). The abdominal cavity was exposed, and the aorta was cannulated below the left kidney, then clamped below the cannula and above the kidney. The left kidney was perfused at 37°C with type I collagenase (0.75 mg/mL; Sigma) containing 25 mmol/L mannitol in perfusion solution. Each kidney was perfused with 40 mL of this solution for 10 minutes, after which cold 150 mmol/L NaCl was poured on the kidney. The partially digested kidney was cut, minced, and stirred at 4°C for 10 minutes in perfusion solution. The suspension was then passed through a nylon mesh (250 µm) and diluted with perfusion solution.7

Angiotensin-Induced Reductions in cAMP
Ang II acts, in part, via a decrease in cAMP in the proximal nephron. Because age-related changes in renal metabolism of cAMP have been reported11 and we found that the effect of Ang II on proximal tubular Jv was greater in young rats than in adults (see "Results"), we investigated whether this was due to a greater Ang II-induced change in cAMP. Using tubule suspensions, we collected loose proximal tubules under a dissecting microscope and transferred them to 1.5-mL tubules using a ladle. Tubules were incubated in 95 µL of perfusion solution containing 1 mmol/L isobutylmethylxanthine at 37°C for 10 minutes before addition of 5 µL of vehicle or Ang II to yield 10-10 mol/L.7. We tested the effects of Ang II on proximal tubules from young and adult rats. The reaction was stopped with 100 µL of methanol after 20 minutes, and the solution was stored at -80°C. cAMP levels were determined using a radioimmunoassay purchased from Biomedical Technologies. On the day of the assay, the samples were dried in a Savant dryer (Forma Scientific) and reconstituted in 110 µL of sodium acetate buffer. cAMP standards were treated similarly to the samples.

Renal Hemodynamics
Hemodynamic responses to Ang II were compared in adult versus young male Sprague-Dawley rats. They were maintained on a diet containing 0.22% Na and 1.1% K for 8 to 10 days. At the conclusion of this period, rats fasted overnight but were allowed free access to water. Then they were anesthetized with ketamine (0.1 mg/kg IP) for the acute procedures outlined below.

Rats were given a tracheostomy using PE-240 tubing (Clay Adams/Becton Dickinson) to facilitate spontaneous breathing of room air. The femoral vein was catheterized with PE-50 tubing for delivery of drugs and a maintenance infusion of 100 µL/min 0.9% NaCl, and the femoral artery was catheterized with PE-50 tubing filled with heparinized saline connected to a Statham pressure transducer (Viggo-Spectramed) and a Gould recorder (Gould Instruments) for continuous monitoring of BP and sampling of arterial blood. When BP was stable, a 250-µL venous sample was collected in 50 µL of 3.8% EDTA for the determination of PRA. The rats then received a supplemental bolus of 6% heat-inactivated bovine serum albumin (Difco Laboratories) of either 1.0 mL for adult rats or 0.5 mL for young rats. To measure RBF, a midventral incision was made in the abdominal cavity, and the left renal artery was dissected from the surrounding tissues. A noncannulating electromagnetic flow probe (Carolina Medical Electronics) with an internal circumference of 2.0 mm for adult rats or 1.5 mm for young rats was placed on the renal artery and allowed to stabilize. At the conclusion of the experimental protocol, the flowmeter was calibrated in situ by measuring graded flows after direct cannulation of the renal artery and gravimetric determination of blood flow over timed intervals. At the end of the experiment, all animals were killed, and the left kidney was decapsulated, excised, and weighed to normalize measurements of RBF per gram of kidney weight.

Renal hemodynamic and systemic responses in vivo to graded bolus doses of Ang II (Sigma) were tested. Each dose was administered in a 200-µL volume of saline vehicle. Responses to the vehicle alone were first measured, and any detectable infusion artifact was corrected for by subtracting this amount (if any) from subsequent responses before analysis. Then we monitored the systemic pressor response and change in RBF after each of three graded doses of Ang II. In adult rats, we administered doses of 8, 40, and 200 fmol Ang II/g bw in a 200-µL bolus. We chose these doses because they bracket the concentration of Ang II used in isolated, perfused tubule experiments. Between doses the rats were allowed to stabilize and return to baseline for 10 minutes. In young rats (whose body weight was only 44% that of adults) doses of Ang II were corrected by body weight to provide equivalent volume of distribution as the adult doses, based on preliminary studies. The actual doses delivered to young rats equaled 8, 40, and 200 fmol Ang II/g bw. RVR was calculated as the ratio of BP (assumed to be the same as renal perfusion pressure) to RBF. RVR was calculated as mm Hg per ml per minute per g of kidney weight, hereafter referred to as resistance units (RU). PRA was measured from a blood sample obtained from the femoral venous catheter. It was collected in potassium EDTA, separated by centrifugation, and frozen for later determination by radioimmunoassay for Ang I using the Gammacoat kit (Incstar Corp) as adapted from the original method of Haber et al.12

Analysis
All values are reported as mean±SEM. For the in vitro studies, results were analyzed by unpaired or paired t-tests as appropriate. Baseline values from the whole animal studies were analyzed using a Student’s unpaired t-test to compare responses in young versus adult rats. Differences in the response to graded doses of Ang II were analyzed using ANOVA with the Bonferonni correction. An value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Angiotensin and Proximal Nephron Fluid Absorption.
We first examined the effect of 10-10 mol/L Ang II on proximal nephron fluid absorption in three successive age groups; including young (4–5 weeks old, 115±4 g bw), intermediate (6 weeks old, 140±3 g bw), and adult (7 weeks old, 166±4 g bw) rats. As shown in Fig 1, during the control period, proximal straight tubules from seven young rats absorbed fluid at a rate of 0.64±0.05 nL/mm per minute. After Ang II was added to the bath, fluid absorption increased by 69±18% to 1.05±0.07 nL/mm per minute (the paired difference equals 0.41±0.08 nL/mm per minute; P<.005). In comparison, proximal straight tubules from five rats in the intermediate-aged group absorbed fluid at 0.60±0.10 nL/mm per minute during the control period, and increased by 34±5% to 0.83±0.16 nL/mm per minute after Ang II was added to the bath (paired difference equals 0.23±0.06 nL/mm per minute; P<.02). In the proximal straight tubules from five rats in the adult group, basal fluid absorption was 0.69±0.06 nL/mm per minute and increased 20±6% to 0.85±0.13 nL/mm per minute after treatment with Ang II (paired difference equals 0.16±0.07 nL/mm per minute; P<.05). Thus, this concentration of Ang II increased fluid absorption more in the youngest rats and had a progressively lesser effect on fluid absorption in the older groups, while basal rates of fluid absorption did not differ (Fig 2). As a result of these progressive changes, further experiments were performed on rats from only the young and the adult groups.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of Jv (nL/mm per min) in proximal straight tubules in young, intermediate-aged, and adult rats before and after addition of Ang II to the bath. *P<.005; +P<.02; #P<.05 vs basal value.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Ang II-induced changes in Jv in proximal straight tubules in young, intermediate-aged, and adult rats in response to 0.1 nmol/L Ang II. *P<.05 vs young.

Angiotensin-Induced Reductions of cAMP
Because the effect of Ang II on proximal tubular Jv was greater in young rats compared with adults, we investigated whether this was due to greater Ang II-induced changes in cAMP. Basal cAMP content of proximal tubules from eight young rats weighing 111±5 g was 24.8±7.6 fmol/mm. After treatment with Ang II, cAMP content fell by 29.7±9.8% (P<.025; Fig 3). In contrast, cAMP content of proximal tubules from nine adults weighing 226±5 g was only 9.8±4.5 fmol/mm before treatment with Ang II, only 40% of the basal value in young rats. After treatment with Ang II, cAMP content of tubules from adult rats was unchanged (9.2±4.5 fmol/mm).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes in cAMP content of proximal straight tubules in young and adult rats in response to Ang II. *P<.05 vs no change.

Renal Hemodynamics
Because we found significant differences in the response of the proximal nephron to Ang II in adult versus young rats, we next investigated whether similar differences were present in the hemodynamic response to Ang II. In the anesthetized state, a group of 11 adult 8-week old rats weighing 256±11 g had a basal BP of 115±5 mm Hg. The heart rate was 335±15, RBF was 6.99±0.42 mL/min per g kw, and RVR was 16.82±0.95 RU. The basal PRA in these anesthetized rats was 11.2±2.3 ng Ang I/mL per hour.

The bolus administration of vehicle produced no remarkable infusion artifact. As shown in Fig 4, the systemic pressor response to graded doses of 8, 40, and 200 fmol Ang II/g bw was 5±1, 16±1, and 42±2 mm Hg, respectively. Each response was significantly different from the control BP. In response to Ang II, RBF decreased by 3%, 17%, and 55% from baseline in response to the three doses, so that RVR was increased progressively and significantly with each dose (Fig 4).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Right, Comparison of the systemic pressor response to graded doses (8, 40, and 200 fmol/g bw) of Ang II in mm Hg in adult and young rats. Left, Comparison of the increase in RVR in response to graded doses (8, 40, and 200 fmol/g bw) of Ang II in adult and young rats. *P<.01,+P<.025 vs zero value. #P<.05.

In the anesthetized state, the seven young rats (4 to 5 weeks old) weighing 113±4 g had a basal BP of 98±7 mm Hg, 17 mm Hg lower than the adults (P<.025). The heart rate was 351±23, and the RBF was 4.94±0.23 mL/min per g kw, some 30% lower than in adults (P<.001). RVR in young rats was 20.30±1.19 RU, 20% greater than in adults (P<.025). Basal PRA in these anesthetized rats was 9.2±2.2 ng Ang I/mL per hour, not significantly different from the anesthetized adults.

As shown in Fig 4, the systemic pressor responses in young rats to graded doses of 8, 40, and 200 fmol Ang II/g bw were 5±2, 14±2, and 34±3 mm Hg, respectively. Whereas there was no difference in the pressor response to Ang II between adult and young rats at the two lower doses, the response to the highest dose in young rats was 20% less than in the adults (P<.05). As with the adults, graded doses of Ang II decreased RBF in young rats by 3%, 15%, and 49% from baseline, respectively. Although absolute changes in RBF (in mL/min per g kw) were somewhat less in the young rats, qualitative changes (expressed as percent change from baseline) were virtually the same as in the adults. The progressive increase in RVR with graded doses of Ang II was no different between adult and young rats (Fig 4). Overall, systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to graded doses of Ang II were very similar in both adult and young rats.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We found that the response of proximal nephron fluid absorption to Ang II decreases as rats mature. This age-dependent response to Ang II was at least partially due to changes in cAMP metabolism, as basal cAMP was 60% greater in young rats and Ang II decreased cAMP by 30% in young rats but had no effect in adults. In contrast, we observed no age-related changes in the response to Ang II in either systemic BP or RVR, and no age-dependent differences in PRA. These observations suggest that in the rapid-growth, adolescent phase of development, Ang II may be an important factor in the evolving regulation of salt and water metabolism but not renal hemodynamics.

We8,9 and others13–16 have reported that Ang II stimulates fluid absorption by the proximal nephron. This stimulation is a combined result of enhanced sodium entry8,9,17–19 and exit processes.8,20,21 However, to our knowledge the data reported here are the first to show directly that Ang II stimulates fluid absorption to a greater extent in young animals than in adults. The differences in the response of the proximal nephron to angiotensin in adult compared with young rats is unlikely to be due to differences in circulating Ang II levels, as we found that the PRA was similar in adult and young rats.

Because we found an age-dependent effect of angiotensin on proximal nephron function, we next examined whether these differences might also be reflected in the reactivity of the renal vessels to Ang II. However, we observed no consistent differences between adult and young rats to graded doses of Ang II, either in the response of systemic BP or in RVR. This dissociation of tubular from vascular responses to Ang II in adult versus young rats suggests that despite higher basal RVR, the renal resistance vessels have largely matured by 6 weeks of age.

Young rats display a diminished capacity to excrete sodium and water in response to volume load compared with adult rats. This attenuated excretory response has been postulated to be due to stimulation of nephron transport by elevated Ang II levels.5 Our results support the hypothesis that young animals have a reduced ability to excrete a sodium load due to enhanced nephron transport. However, they also indicate that greater sensitivity to Ang II in the proximal nephron may account for part of this response, in addition to elevated Ang II levels. In fact, the greater sensitivity of the proximal nephron may be even more important, since in 4- to 6-week-old rats Ang II levels were not significantly different from those of adults, but the proximal nephron still showed an enhanced sensitivity to Ang II.

The fact that we found no age-dependent differences in the renal hemodynamic response to Ang II was somewhat surprising in light of out results concerning the proximal nephron. However, superficial nephrons are the last segment of the kidney to develop, while the vasculature for these nephrons is already present.22,23 Thus an age-related difference in the response of hemodynamic parameters may exist in animals young than those we studied.

When Ang II binds to its receptor in the proximal tubule, the resulting receptor-ligand complex activates at least two classes of G proteins. One is an inhibitory G protein (Gi), which blocks adenylate cyclase. The inhibition of adenylate cyclase results in turn in a decrease in both cAMP levels and in protein kinase A activity.24 We found age-dependent changes in cAMP metabolism in response to Ang II with young animals, which displayed a greater ability to reduce cAMP levels in response to Ang II than did adult rats. Age-dependent changes in cAMP metabolism effected by other hormones have been reported previously. For instance, parathyroid hormone stimulates cAMP production to a greater extent in young rats than in adults.11

There remains the question of what this exaggerated effect in young rats might be attributed to. A change in the amount of the Gi protein in the proximal tubular cells may account for our results. A decrease in G proteins with age has been shown in vascular smooth muscle25 as well as in the kidney.11 Interestingly, a decrease in the stimulatory G protein Gs as well as Gi has been shown to occur in the kidney with age.11 However, changes in other enzymes associated with the cAMP second messenger cascade, such as protein kinase A26 or phosphodiesterases27 may also be involved.

Although the differences in response to Ang II may be due to differences in receptor number and/or subtype, it should be noted that the number of receptors has been reported to decrease only 15% in rats of these ages.6 However, the superficial nephrons studied here are the last to develop and thus may be in a different developmental stage than the kidney as a whole. Consequently, variations in receptor density and type cannot be ruled out as an explanation for the results.

The other second messenger cascade activated by Ang II is the protein kinase C cascade. We did not study whether the activation of protein kinase C is enhanced in young animals compared with adults. However, our preliminary data indicate that the total amount of protein kinase C is greater in young rats than in adult animals. Thus, it seems likely that the activation of this enzyme by Ang II would be greater in the former. Interestingly, the basal rates of fluid absorption did not vary between groups. Elevated levels of protein kinase C or some other factor that stimulates transport may account for the basal rates of fluid absorption being similar, but young animals have a much greater cAMP content.

In summary, we report that the Ang II stimulation of proximal nephron fluid absorption decreases as rats mature, and that this age-dependent response to Ang II was mirrored by changes in cAMP metabolism, as both basal and Ang II-decrease cAMP in proximal tubules was greater in young rats. These age-related responses to Ang II were not reflected in systemic BP, the renal vasculature, or PRA. We suggest that in the rapid-growth, adolescent phase of development, Ang II may be an important factor in the evolving regulating of salt and water metabolism, but not renal hemodynamics.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL 28982) to J.G. and W.B. and the American Heart Association (96008180) to J.G. J.G. was the recipient of a Research Career Development Award from the National Institutes of Health (HL 02891) during this work.

Received September 17, 1997; first decision October 3, 1997; accepted October 15, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Keeton TK, Campbell WB. The pharmacologic alteration of renin release. Pharmacol Rev. 1980; 32 : 81 –227.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Hall J. Control of sodium excretion by angiotensin II: intrarenal mechanisms and blood pressure regulation. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250 : R960 –R972.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Solomon S, Iaina A, Eliahou H, Serban I. Postnatal changes in plasma and renal renin of the rat. Biol Neonate. 1977; 32 : 237 –242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Kalinyak JE, Hoffman AR, Perlman AJ. Ontogeny of angiotensinogen mRNA and angiotensin II receptors in rat brain and liver. J Endocrinol Invest. 1991; 14 : 647 –653.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Chevalier RL, Thornhill BA, Belmonte DC, Baertschi AJ. Endogenous angiotensin II inhibits natriuresis after acute volume expansion in the neonatal rat. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270 : R393 –R397.

6. Aguilera G, Kapur S, Feuillan P, Sunar-Akbasak B, Bathia AJ. Developmental changes in angiotensin II receptor subtypes and AT1 receptor mRNA in rat kidney. Kidney Int. 1994; 46 : 973 –979.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Garcia N, Garvin JL. ANF and angiotensin II interact via kinases in the proximal straight tubule. Am J Physiol. 1995; 268 : F730 –F735.

8. Garvin JL. Angiotensin stimulates glucose and fluid absorption by rat proximal straight tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1990; 1 : 272 –277.[Abstract]

9. Garvin JL. Angiotensin stimulates bicarbonate transport and Na+/K+ ATPase activity in the proximal nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1991; 1 : 1146 –1152.[Abstract]

10. Garvin JL, Burg MB, Knepper MA. Ammonium replaces potassium in supporting sodium transport by the Na+/K+-ATPase of renal proximal straight tubules. Am J Physiol. 1985; 249 : F785 –F788.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Hanai H, Liang CT, Cheng L, Sacktor B. Desensitization to parathyroid hormone in renal cells from aged rats is associated with alterations in G-protein activity. J Clin Invest. 1989; 83 : 268 –277.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Haber E, Koerber T, Page CB, Kilman B, Pernode A. Application of a radioimmunoassay for angiotensin I to the physiological measurement of plasma renin activity in normal human subjects. J Endocrinol Metab. 1969; 29 : 1349 –1355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Liu F-Y, Cogan MG. Angiotensin II: a potent regulator of acidification in the early proximal convoluted tubule. J Clin Invest. 1987; 80 : 272 –275.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Liu F-Y, Cogan MG. Angiotensin II stimulates early proximal bicarbonate absorption in the rat by decreasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate. J Clin Invest. 1989; 84 : 83 –91.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Liu F-Y, Cogan MG. Angiotensin II stimulation of hydrogen ion secretion in the rat early proximal tubule. J Clin Invest. 1988; 82 : 601 –607.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Harris PJ, Young JA. Dose-dependent stimulation and inhibition of proximal tubular sodium reabsorption by angiotensin II in rat kidney. Pflugers Arch. 1977; 367 : 295 –297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Gesek FA, Schoolwerth AC. Hormonal interaction with the proximal Na-H exchanger. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258 : F514 –F521.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Saccomani G, Mitchell KD, Navar LG. Angiotensin II stimulation of Na+ -H+ exchange in proximal tubule cells. Am J Physiol. 1990; 258 : F1188 –F1195.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Jourdain M, Amiel C, Friedlander G. Modulation of Na-H exchange activity by angiotensin II in opossum kidney cells. Am J Physiol. 1992; 263 : C1141 –C1146.

20. Coppola S, Fromter E. An electrophysiological study of angiotensin II regulation of Na-HCO3 cotransport and K conductance in renal proximal tubules. I. Effect of picomolar concentrations. Pflugers Arch. 1994; 427 : 143 –150.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Fryckstedt J. Aperia A, Holtback U, Syren ML, Svensson LB, Greengard P. ANP and cGMP abolish ANG II induced stimulation of Na+/K+ ATPase activity (Na/K) in isolated proximal convoluted tubules. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1993; 4 : 439 . Abstract.

22. Sorokin L, Ekblom P. Development of tubular and glomerular cells of the kidney. Kidney Int. 1992; 41 : 657 –664.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Ekblom P, Thesleff I, Sariola H. The extracellular matrix in tissue morphogenesis and angiogenesis. In: Edelman G, Thiery J-P, eds. The Cell in Contact. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 1985: 365 –392.

24. Romero MF, Hopfer U, Madhun ZT, Zhou W, Douglas JG. Angiotensin II actions in the rabbit proximal tubule. Renal Physiol Biochem. 1991; 14 : 199 –207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Mader SL, Downing CL, Amos-Landgraf J, Swebjka P. Age-related changes in G proteins in rat aorta. J Gerontol. 1996; 51A : B111 –B116.

26. Deisher TA, Mankani S, Hoffman BB. Role of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in diminished beta adrenergic responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle with increasing age. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989; 249 : 812 –819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Norling LL, Vaughan CA, Chevalier RL. Maturation of cGMP response to ANP by isolated glomeruli. Am J. Physiol. 1992; 262 : F138 –F143.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
M. Herrera, P. A. Ortiz, and J. L. Garvin
Regulation of thick ascending limb transport: role of nitric oxide
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2006; 290(6): F1279 - F1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Boesch and J. L. Garvin
Age-dependent activation of PKC isoforms by angiotensin II in the proximal nephron
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): R861 - R867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garvin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garvin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Beierwaltes, W. H.