Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;31:487-492

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffrin, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffrin, E. L.

(Hypertension. 1998;31:487.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Effects of AT1 and AT2 Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists in Angiotensin II-Infused Rats

Jin S. Li; Rhian M. Touyz; Ernesto L. Schiffrin

From MRC Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Correspondence to Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD, PhD, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, 110 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2W 1R7. E-mail schiffe{at}ircm.umontreal.ca


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Angiotensin II (Ang II) appears to exert its contractile and growth-promoting effects through the AT1 receptor subtype, whereas the AT2 subtype may have growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic properties. Recently, some data have challenged this emerging concept. To clarify the role of AT1 and AT2 receptors, we treated Wistar rats that were infused with Ang II (120 ng/kg/min subcutaneously by osmotic minipump), with the AT1 antagonist losartan (10 mg/kg/d in the drinking water) and the AT2 antagonist PD123319 (30 mg/kg/d subcutaneously by osmotic minipump) for 21 days. At the end of the study, tail-cuff systolic blood pressure was 106±2.8 mm Hg in untreated rats and 108±2.0 mm Hg in rats infused with Ang II that received losartan, whereas it rose to 158±4.9 mm Hg in Ang II-infused rats and 158±3.0 mm Hg in rats infused with Ang II rats and PD123319 (the two latter groups P<.01 versus the two other groups). Heart weight, and aorta cross-section/body weight ratio were higher in Ang II-infused rats than in controls and were significantly reduced in Ang II-infused rats that received losartan (P<.05). Wire-myograph-mounted coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries from Ang II-infused rats and Ang II-infused rats receiving PD123319 had a greater media, media cross-section, and media/lumen ratio than vessels from untreated or Ang II-infused rats treated with losartan. These results support the concept that in Wistar normotensive rats infused for 3 weeks with angiotensin II, growth in the heart, aorta, and coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries is mediated by the AT1 receptor; the results show little evidence of a role of AT2 receptors in mediating angiotensin II effects in this experimental paradigm.


Key Words: blood pressure • small arteries • resistance arteries • remodeling • vascular smooth muscle cells • growth • vascular hypertrophy

Abbreviations: Ang II = angiotensin II • 1 AT1 = angiotensin receptor subtype • 2 AT2 = angiotensin receptor subtype


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Ang II, the final mediator of the renin-angiotensin system, plays a pivotal physiological role in cardiovascular homeostasis. It is a potent vasoconstrictor of the peripheral vasculature and induces growth of smooth muscle cells of blood vessels and in the heart.1 Because of these actions, Ang II may play an important patho-physiological role in the development and maintenance of hypertension.2 Cellular responses to Ang II are mediated by specific cell membrane receptors. Two main subtypes of angiotensin receptors have been pharmacologically defined and cloned: AT1 receptors, which are blocked specifically by losartan, and AT2 receptors, which are blocked specifically by PD123319.3,4 Ang II appears to exert its contractile and growth-promoting effects through the AT1 receptor subtype,3,4 whereas the AT2 subtype has been suggested to have growth-inhibitory and proapoptotic properties.5,6 Recently, some data have challenged this emerging concept. In two successive publications,7,8 investigators obtained results suggesting that when Ang II was infused subcutaneously for 3 weeks into Wistar rats, the increase in blood pressure that occurs in this experimental paradigm is mediated by AT1 receptors, as shown by abrogation of this effect by concurrent administration of losartan, an AT1 angiotensin antagonist. In contrast, medial hypertrophy of aorta and coronary arteries was abolished by concomitant administration of the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319. The Ang II-dependent growth of vascular smooth muscle cells was associated with reversal to an immature phenotype, as shown by the expression of cellular fibronectin and nonmuscle myosin, which was abolished when losartan was coadministered with Ang II.8 In addition, administration of losartan alone to normal rats reproduced the Ang II-induced vascular hypertrophy. The authors concluded that Ang II-induced growth of vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated by AT2 receptors, whereas the phenotypic changes of smooth muscle cells are AT1-dependent.8

To clarify the role of AT1 and AT2 receptors in Ang II-induced growth, we have reproduced in part the experiments reported previously7 and have examined morphometrically small resistance size arteries in the coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral circulation for evidence of growth in presence of AT1 and AT2 receptor antagonism. We treated Wistar rats that were infused with Ang II (120 ng/kg/min subcutaneously by osmotic minipump), with the AT1 antagonist losartan (10 mg/kg/d in the drinking water) and/or the AT2 antagonist PD123319 (30 mg/kg/d subcutaneously by osmotic minipump) for 21 days. At the end of the study, coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries were investigated on a wire-myograph. Our results support the concept that in Wistar normotensive rats infused for 3 weeks with Ang II, growth in the heart, aorta, and coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries is mediated by the AT1 receptor; our results show little evidence of a role of AT2 receptors in mediating Ang II effects in this experimental paradigm.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animal experiments were performed according to the recommendations of the Canadian Council for Animal Care and were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Clinical Research Institute. Wistar rats weighing 200 g were bought from Charles River. They were housed in individual cages under conditions of constant temperature (22°C) and humidity (60%) and exposed to a 12-hour dark/light cycle. An osmotic minipump (Alzet, model 2ML4) was implanted subcutaneously in the back of the neck of each rat under anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital (Somnotol®), 50 mg/kg intraperitoneally. Ile5-Ang II (Peninsula), 0.6 mg/mL to infuse 120 ng/kg per min, or PD123319 (a kind gift of Dr. Joan Keiser, Parke-Davis) to infuse 30 mg/kg/d, a dose that has been shown to exert an effective AT2 blockade,7,8 was dissolved in saline solution. Minipumps infused at 2.5 µL/h for 21 days. Rats received the AT1 antagonist losartan in their drinking water at a dose of 10 mg/kg/d, the concentration being adjusted daily according to water consumption. Systolic blood pressure was taken weekly by the tail-cuff method, after warming and under slight restraint in a Plexiglas cage, and recorded on a model 7 Grass polygraph fitted with a 7-P8 preamplifier, using a PCPB photoelectric pulse sensor (all from Grass Medical Instruments). The average of three pressure readings was recorded. On the day of the experiment, rats were killed by decapitation. The heart and a 2.5-cm segment of thoracic aorta were dissected out, blotted dry, and weighed.

Measurement of Cross-Sectional Area of Aorta
The thoracic aorta was dissected out and immediately frozen in dry ice and kept at -70°C until used. Frozen segments of aorta were cut in 8-µm-thick sections, fixed, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The cross-sectional area of the intima media of the aorta was evaluated from micrographs of whole aortic ring sections taken at 10x magnification and scanned, digitized, and analyzed by computer, using Adobe Photoshop Imaging software (Adobe System Corporation).

Preparation of Small Arteries
Coronary, renal arcuate and femoral arteries were obtained as we have described previously.9,10 The heart and the kidneys were placed in ice-cold Krebs’ solution. The rat was then placed in the supine position, and the skin of the right hind leg was incised. An artery in the popliteal region about 2 mm in length was dissected. To dissect coronary vessels, the right ventricle was opened to expose coronary arteries in the interventricular septum. The interventricular artery was followed to the cardiac apex, and then the chordae tendinae and the myocardium were separated, and a 2-mm-long vessel was isolated. For the isolation of renal cortical arteries, the renal capsule was first removed. The kidney was sectioned, and a renal artery was dissected close to the renal cortex and then followed distally. A renal arcuate artery about 2 mm in length was isolated. Mesenteric small arteries were obtained as previously described. Superior mesenteric arteries were taken from the part of the mesenteric vascular bed that feeds the jejunum 8 to 10 cm distal to the pylorus. A third-order branch 1 mm distant from the intestine and about 2 mm in length was isolated. The vessels were mounted as ring preparations on an isometric myograph (Living Systems Instrumentation). The dissection and mounting were performed in physiological salt solution (PSS) at room temperature. PSS had the following composition (in mmol/L): NaCl, 120; NaHCO3, 25; KCl, 4.7; KH2PO4, 1.18; MgSO4, 1.17; CaCl2, 2.5; ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 0.026; glucose, 5.5. All solutions were bubbled with 95% air and 5% CO2 to give a pH 7.40 to 7.45. Solutions were maintained at 37°C.

Protocol of Study of Small Arteries
After mounting, the vessels were warmed to 37°C and allowed to equilibrate in PSS for about 30 minutes with the vessel internal circumference set to give a wall tension of 0.2 mN/mm. Then media width was measured by using a Leitz-Diavert inverted light microscope (Wild Leitz), at 320x magnification (which provides a resolution of 0.4 µm) and with bright field illumination, at 12 different sites along the length of the vessel wall, which were then averaged. The relationship between resting tension and internal circumference was then determined, allowing the internal circumference that the vessels would have when relaxed and under a transmural pressure of 100 mm Hg (L100) to be established.9,10 The vessels were then set to the standardized internal circumference L0, where L0=0.9 L100, from which the standardized lumen diameter (thereafter called lumen diameter) was later calculated (see below).

Analysis of Data
Small artery parameters were calculated from measurements on the myograph as previously described.9,10 In brief, the media cross-sectional area (A) of wire-myograph-mounted small arteries was obtained from the media thickness (m) and the circumference of vessels (L), all measured with the vessel relaxed and under no passive stretch (wall tension of 0.2 mN/mm), and calculated as A=Lm+{pi}m2. By using L0 and the calculated media cross-sectional area and assuming a constant media volume, the standardized media thickness of blood vessels (at L0) was then calculated. The lumen diameter was obtained as L0/{pi}.

Results are represented as mean±SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed by ANOVA followed by a Newman-Keuls post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant when P<.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Blood pressure did not change in untreated rats (Fig 1 and Table 1). In Ang II-infused rats, systolic blood pressure rose 50 mm Hg more than in untreated rats (Table 1 and Fig 1), whereas blood pressure was unchanged in rats infused with Ang II that received losartan. Losartan alone had no effect on blood pressure. Ang II-infused rats that received simultaneously an infusion of PD123319 showed a rise in blood pressure similar to that of rats receiving only Ang II.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The time-course of systolic blood pressure of Wistar rats infused or not infused with angiotensin II (Ang II) and receiving or not receiving losartan or PD123319. n=5 to 7 rats per group. *P<.01 versus other groups. Weeks indicates time from implantation of minipumps.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Blood Pressure, Body and Heart Weight, and Aorta Cross-sectional Area

Body weight was similar in all rats except in Ang II-infused rats receiving losartan, in which it was lower (P<.05) than that of untreated rats (Table 1). The heart/body weight ratio and the cross-sectional area of the intima media of the aorta were increased (P<.05) by the Ang II infusion. In losartan-treated rats infused with Ang II, the heart/body weight ratio was smaller (P<.05) and the cross-sectional area of the intima media of the aorta was lower (P<.05 by Student’s t-test) than in Ang II-infused rats. Interestingly, the cross-sectional area of aorta (corrected or not for body weight) of rats treated only with losartan or infused simultaneously with Ang II and with the AT2 antagonist PD123319 achieved similar values, not significantly different from those of either untreated or Ang II-infused rats but intermediate between these two groups.

Wire-myograph-mounted coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries had a greater media width, media cross-sectional area, and media/lumen ratio in Ang II-infused rats and in Ang II-infused rats receiving PD123319 than in untreated rats or Ang II-infused rats treated with losartan (Table 2 and Fig 2, P<.01). Losartan alone had no effect on small artery structure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Morphometric Parameters of Small Arteries



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The cross-sectional area of media of small arteries dissected from the coronary, renal cortical, mesenteric, and femoral vasculature from Wistar rats infused or not infused with angiotensin II (Ang II) and receiving or not receiving losartan or PD123329, studied on an isometric wire-myograph. *P<.01 versus control, losartan, or Ang II+ losartan.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Besides its vasoconstrictor role, Ang II acts as a growth-promoting agent. It induces growth (hypertrophy and/or hyperplasia) in many cultured cell types and in vivo.1,2,11–13 Like most of the known physiological effects of Ang II, evidence up to the present has suggested that these trophic effects are mediated by AT1 receptors. Indeed, until recently, it was believed that vascular Ang II receptors were exclusively of the AT1 subtype. However, the adult rat aorta expresses a small but significant amount of AT2 receptors as well.14 In aorta of fetal and young rats, the proportion of AT2 receptors is higher; this predominance of AT2 receptors is reversed during development.14,15 In 2-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats, 81% of angiotensin receptors in the aorta are of the AT2 subtype; in 8-week-old rats, this is reduced to 28%, with a predominance of AT1 (71%).14 In 6-to 8-week-old SHR and WKY rats, renal resistance vessels display 20% of Ang II binding sites with affinity to PD123319.16 Recent studies have contributed to elucidate in part the elusive role of AT2 receptors. Stoll et al17 demonstrated an antiproliferative effect of Ang II on coronary endothelial cells, which could be blocked by the AT2 antagonist PD123177, and recent work has implicated AT2 receptors in induction of apoptosis.9 However, controversial studies have suggested a complex interaction of angiotensin receptor sub-types in the regulation of growth. Saward et al18 reported that PD123319 but not losartan could block Ang II-induced RNA synthesis in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells. Finally, two recent studies in which Wistar rats were treated for 3 weeks with Ang II and PD123319 showed that blood pressure remained high but fibrosis and vascular hypertrophy were reduced by the AT2 antagonist compared to Ang II infusion alone.7 In contrast to the antihypertrophic effect of the AT2 antagonist, reversal to an immature phenotype, as shown by expression of cellular fibronectin and nonmuscle myosin, which was associated with Ang II-dependent growth of vascular smooth muscle cells, was abolished when losartan was administered with Ang II.8 Administration of losartan alone to normal rats reproduced the Ang II-induced vascular hypertrophy. The authors concluded that Ang II-induced growth of vascular smooth muscle cells is mediated by AT2 receptors, whereas the phenotypic changes of smooth muscle cells are AT1-dependent.8 The present results, particularly the cardiac and the small artery data, are in contrast to the results of Lévy et al7 and Sabri et al8 and argue against the purported prohypertrophic role of AT2 receptors. They agree with previous evidence in favor of a role of AT1 receptors in growth of vascular smooth muscle cells, leaving open the possibility of an antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic action of AT2 receptors.

Cardiac weight and the volume per unit length (cross-sectional area) of the intima media of the aorta were significantly increased in angiotensin II-infused rats only when evaluated relative to body weight, which was lower in this group. Hypertensive rats very often exhibit lower body weight than normotensive controls, and cardiac and vascular growth may not be apparent unless normalized by body weight. However, Brink et al19 have reported that angiotensin II induces weight loss through a pressor-independent mechanism that involves decreased food intake and body fat. This confounding factor has to be borne in mind, and the data regarding cardiac and aortic growth should be evaluated in the perspective that decreased adiposity resulting from reduced food intake may have affected these tissues differently from other tissues. In a previous study, we showed that in rats, aorta segment wet weight correlates with body weight20 and cross-sectional area of aorta correlates with the weight of aorta segments but is a more precise measurement. The cross-sectional area of the intima media of the aorta was lower in losartan-treated rats infused with Ang II than in Ang II-infused rats, achieving significance (P<.05) only after a t-test but not by ANOVA. Interestingly, the cross-sectional area of the aorta (corrected or not for body weight) of rats treated only with losartan or infused simultaneously with Ang II and with the AT2 antagonist PD123319 achieved similar values (an increase of 4% to 5% above control), which were not statistically different from those in either untreated or Ang II-infused rats but were intermediate between these two groups. This is somewhat similar to the report of aortic growth in Ang II-infused rats by Lévy et al7 and Sabri et al,8 who found an increase of 5% in media thickness of aorta in Ang II-infused rats receiving PD123319 and an increase of 10% in rats receiving only losartan. The absence of statistical significance between some of these differences in mean values may be the result of a type II error, since the very limited amounts of the AT2 antagonist available made it possible for only very small numbers of rats to be evaluated under treatment for 3 weeks. With the large amounts of PD123319 required for a 3-week-long treatment at the dose of this agent that had been employed in the previous studies,7,8 not enough was available to study a group receiving only PD123319 or a combined group receiving losartan and PD123319. The potential explanation that AT2 receptors may play a modest growth-promoting role in aorta, as suggested by Lévy et al7 and Sabri et al,8 cannot be conclusively ruled out in the present study, especially considering other independent evidence showing the presence of AT2 receptors in aortic smooth muscle14,15 and a hypertrophic effect mediated via AT2 receptors in smooth muscle line derived from aorta.18 However, the present results suggest that in the heart and in small resistance arteries of four vascular beds, Ang II induces growth mainly via AT1 receptors and that AT2 receptors do not appear to be mediating growth-promoting effects at this level in this experimental paradigm.

The mechanism whereby angiotensin II exerts its growth-stimulating effect via AT1 receptors has been in part elucidated recently when some studies have provided evidence that as in other tissues, in blood vessels Ang II stimulates endothelin-1 productions.21,22 Rajagopalan et al21 demonstrated that after Ang II infusion for 5 days in rats, endothelin expression in the deeper smooth muscle layers of the aorta is enhanced, and blood pressure increase and aortic growth are as well antagonized by the AT1 antagonist losartan as by an ETA-selective endothelin receptor antagonist. D’Uscio et al22 showed that another ETA antagonist slightly reduced blood pressure and abrogated growth of mesenteric small arteries. Thus, smooth muscle expression of endothelin-1 appears to mediate in rats via ETA receptors the effects of exogenous angiotensin II infusion, the latter stimulating endothelin-1 through AT1 receptor activation. It is possible that this AT1 receptor-mediated involvement of endothelin-1 in Ang II-induced vascular growth in Ang II-infused rats occurs mainly in response to exogenous Ang II, since in 2-kidney 1 clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats, a high renin (and therefore Ang II) hypertensive model, vascular growth is relatively minor, with eutrophic rather than hypertrophic small artery remodeling predominating,23 and endothelin-1 does not appear to play an important role.23,24 In this study, as in previous studies examining small artery structure in the Ang II-infused rat,13 hypertrophic remodeling occurred with no reduction in lumen diameter of the resistance arteries examined. This remodeling is similar to the one that has been attributed to endothelin,25 whereas in hypertensive models in which endothelin is not involved but in which endogenous Ang II may play a role, the remodeling of small arteries is inward eutrophic, with reduction of the lumen diameter, as found in 2-kidney 1 clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats23 and in spontaneously hypertensive rats.26

The absence of effects of the AT2 antagonist in the present study could be due to ineffective blockade of AT2 receptors by the dose of PD123319 used. However, the dose used in the present study is a very large one, and it is that infused by Lévy et al7 and Sabri et al8 to postulate effects mediated by AT2 receptors in this same experimental paradigm. It is not easy to demonstrate blockade of AT2 receptors unless binding inhibition with the pharmacological characteristics of AT2 receptor binding is shown, since known physiological and biochemical effects of AT2 receptors are presently mostly in vitro effects5,6 with few documented in vivo results.27 We are therefore unable in this study to certify that the dose that was used indeed achieved a blockade of putative AT2 receptors to the same degree as in the previous studies,7,8 even if the dose used was the same, and this must be mentioned as a potential limitation of the study. The very large dose of PD123319 that had to be used in vivo for 3 weeks and the very limited availability of the compound precluded both the evaluation of larger numbers of rats in the PD123319-treated group and the introduction of two experimental groups that would be very useful for this study, that is, a group treated only with PD 123319 and one receiving Ang II, losartan, and PD123319. These are recognized limitations of the study, since an appropriate baseline for comparison of the Ang II-infused PD123319-treated group is one receiving only PD123319.

In conclusion, these results support the concept that in Wistar normotensive rats infused for 3 weeks with angiotensin II, growth in the heart, aorta, and coronary, renal, mesenteric, and femoral small arteries is mediated in large measure by the AT1 receptor and show little evidence, particularly in heart and small mesenteric arteries, of a role of AT2 receptors in mediating angiotensin II effects in this experimental paradigm.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors are grateful to André Turgeon for technical help. This work was supported by a group grant from the Medical Research Council of Canada to the Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension, by grants from the Québec Heart Foundation, and by a Medical School Grant from Merck and Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, New Jersey.

Received September 17, 1997; first decision October 10, 1997; accepted October 22, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Itoh H, Muloyama M, Pratt RE, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. Multiple autocrine growth factors modulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91 : 2268 –2272.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Scott-Burden T, Resink TJ, Hahn AWA, Bühler FR. Angiotensin-induced growth related metabolism is activated in cultured smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats and Wistar-Kyoto rats. Am J Hypertens. 1991; 4 : 183 –188.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Timmermans PBMWM, Wong PC, Chiu AT, Herblin WF, Benfield P, Carini DJ, Lee RJ, Wexler RR, Saye JAM, Smith RD. Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev. 1993; 25 : 205 –251.

4. Inagami T. Recent progress in molecular and cell biological studies of angiotensin receptors. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1995; 4 : 47 –54.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Stoll M, Stecklings M, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95 : 651 –657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Yamada T, Horiuchi M, Dzau VJ. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor mediates programmed cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93 : 156 –160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Lévy BI, Benassiano J, Henrion D, Caputo L, Heymes C, Duriez M, Poitevin P, Samuel JL. Chronic blockade of AT2-subtype receptors prevents the effect of angiotensin II on the rat vascular structure. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98 : 418 –425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Sabri A, Lévy BI, Poitevin P, Caputo L, Faggin E, Marotte F, Rappaport L, Samuel JL. Differential roles of AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes in vascular trophic and phenotypic changes in response to stimulation with angiotensin II. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997; 17 : 257 –264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Li J-S, Schiffrin EL. Effect of chronic treatment of adult spontaneously hypertensive rats with an endothelin receptor antagonist. Hypertension. 1995; 25 (Part 1): 495 –500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Li J-S, Schiffrin EL. Effect of calcium channel blockade or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on structure of coronary, renal and other small arteries in SHR. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996; 28 : 68 –74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Geisterfer AAT, Peach MJ, Owens GK. Angiotensin II induces hypertrophy, not hyperplasia, of culture rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1988; 62 : 749 –756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Gibbons GH, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy vs. hyperplasia: autocrine transforming growth factor-ß1 expression determines growth response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1992; 90 : 456 –461.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Griffin SA, Brown WCB, Macpherson F, McGrath JC, Wilson VG, Korsgaard N, Mulvany MJ, Lever AF. Angiotensin II causes vascular hypertrophy in part by a non-pressor mechanism. Hypertension. 1991; 17 : 626 –635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Viswanathan M, Tsutsumi K, Correa FMA, Saavedra JM. Changes in expression of angiotensin receptor subtypes in the rat aorta during development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991; 179 : 1361 –1367.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Viswathan M, Saavedra JM. Angiotensin II receptor subtypes and growth. In Saavedra JM, Timmermans PBMWM, eds. Angiotensin/Receptors. New York: Plenum Press; 1994; 205 –218.

16. Chatziantoniou C, Arendshorst WJ. Angiotensin receptor sites in renal vasculature of rats developing genetic hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1993; 265 : F853 –F862.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Stoll M, Stecklings M, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95 : 651 –657.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Saward L, Zahradka P. The angiotensin type 2 receptor mediates RNA synthesis in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996; 28 : 499 –506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Brink M, Wellen J, Delafontaine P. Angiotensin II causes weight loss and inreased insulin-like growth factor I through a pressor-independent mechanism. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97 : 2509 –2516.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Schiffrin EL, Larivière R, Li J-S, Sventek P. Enhanced expression of endothelin-1 gene in blood vessels of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats: correlation with vascular structure. J Vasc Res. 1996; 33 : 235 –248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Rajagopalan S, Laursen JB, Borthayre A, Kurz S, Keiser J, Haleen S, Giaid A, Harrison DG. Role for endothelin-1 in angiotensin II-mediated hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 30 : 29 –34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. D’Uscio LV, Moreau P, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M, Lüscher TF. Effects of chronic ETA-receptor blockade in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1997; 29 : 435 –441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Li J-S, Knafo L, Turgeon A, Garcia R, Schiffrin EL. Effect of endothelin antagonism on blood pressure and vascular structure in renovascular hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1996; 40 : H88 –H93.

24. Sventek P, Turgeon A, Garcia R, Schiffrin EL. Vascular and cardiac overexpression of endothelin-1 gene in 1-kidney, one clip Goldblatt hypertensive rats but only in the late phase of 2-kidney, 1 clip Goldblatt hypertension. J Hypertens. 1996; 14 : 57 –64.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Schiffrin EL. Endothelin. Potential role in hypertension and vascular hypertrophy Brief review. Hypertension 1995; 25 : 1135 –1143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Li JS, Sharifi AM, Schiffrin EL. Effect of AT1 angiotensin-receptor blockade on structure and function of small arteries in SHR. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997; 30 : 75 –83.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Siragy HM, Carey RM. The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J Clin Invest. 1996; 97 : 1978 –1982.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Belabbas, S. Zalvidea, D. Casellas, J.-P. Moles, O. Galbes, J. Mercier, and B. Jover
Contrasting effect of exercise and angiotensin II hypertension on in vivo and in vitro cardiac angiogenesis in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): R1512 - R1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
W. J. Welch, K. Patel, P. Modlinger, M. Mendonca, N. Kawada, K. Dennehy, S. Aslam, and C. S. Wilcox
Roles of vasoconstrictor prostaglandins, COX-1 and -2, and AT1, AT2, and TP receptors in a rat model of early 2K,1C hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2644 - H2649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
P. Brassard, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin
Combined Angiotensin II Type 1 and Type 2 Receptor Blockade on Vascular Remodeling and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Resistance Arteries
Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 598 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. Wesseling, D. A. Ishola Jr., J. A. Joles, H. A. Bluyssen, H. A. Koomans, and B. Braam
Resistance to oxidative stress by chronic infusion of angiotensin II in mouse kidney is not mediated by the AT2 receptor
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): F1191 - F1200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. E. Mabrouk, Q. N. Diep, K. Benkirane, R. M. Touyz, and E. L. Schiffrin
SAM68: a downstream target of angiotensin II signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells in genetic hypertension
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1954 - H1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. Lako-Futo, I. Szokodi, B. Sarman, G. Foldes, H. Tokola, M. Ilves, H. Leskinen, O. Vuolteenaho, R. Skoumal, R. deChatel, et al.
Evidence for a Functional Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in the Cardiac Hypertrophic Process In Vivo in the Rat Heart
Circulation, November 11, 2003; 108(19): 2414 - 2422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
T. Chabrashvili, C. Kitiyakara, J. Blau, A. Karber, S. Aslam, W. J. Welch, and C. S. Wilcox
Effects of ANG II type 1 and 2 receptors on oxidative stress, renal NADPH oxidase, and SOD expression
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R117 - R124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Eto, S. Biro, M. Miyata, H. Kaieda, H. Obata, T. Kihara, K. Orihara, and C. Tei
Angiotensin II type 1 receptor participates in extracellular matrix production in the late stage of remodeling after vascular injury
Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 200 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
E.-L. Marchand, S. Der Sarkissian, P. Hamet, and D. deBlois
Caspase-Dependent Cell Death Mediates the Early Phase of Aortic Hypertrophy Regression in Losartan-Treated Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Circ. Res., April 18, 2003; 92(7): 777 - 784.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Cervenka, V. Horacek, I. Vaneckova, J. A. Hubacek, M. I. Oliverio, T. M. Coffman, and L. G. Navar
Essential Role of AT1A Receptor in the Development of 2K1C Hypertension
Hypertension, November 1, 2002; 40(5): 735 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
Z. Cao, F. Bonnet, R. Candido, S. P. Nesteroff, W. C. Burns, H. Kawachi, F. Shimizu, R. M. Carey, M. de Gasparo, and M. E. Cooper
Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor Antagonism Confers Renal Protection in a Rat Model of Progressive Renal Injury
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2002; 13(7): 1773 - 1787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
S. Phoon and L. G. Howes
Forearm vasodilator response to angiotensin II in elderly women receiving candesartan: role of AT2- receptors
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, March 1, 2002; 3(1): 36 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Schuijt, M. Basdew, R. van Veghel, R. de Vries, P. R. Saxena, R. G. Schoemaker, and A. H. Jan Danser
AT2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in the heart: effect of myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2590 - H2596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
R. M. Carey, N. L. Howell, X.-H. Jin, and H. M. Siragy
Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor-Mediated Hypotension in Angiotensin Type-1 Receptor-Blocked Rats
Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1272 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Brede, K. Hadamek, L. Meinel, F. Wiesmann, J. Peters, S. Engelhardt, A. Simm, A. Haase, M. J. Lohse, and L. Hein
Vascular Hypertrophy and Increased P70S6 Kinase in Mice Lacking the Angiotensin II AT2 Receptor
Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2602 - 2607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. Henrion, N. Kubis, and B. I. Levy
Physiological and Pathophysiological Functions of the AT2 Subtype Receptor of Angiotensin II: From Large Arteries to the Microcirculation
Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1150 - 1157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. Ruiz-Ortega, O. Lorenzo, M. Ruperez, J. Blanco, and J. Egido
Systemic Infusion of Angiotensin II into Normal Rats Activates Nuclear Factor-{{kappa}}B and AP-1 in the Kidney : Role of AT1 and AT2 Receptors
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2001; 158(5): 1743 - 1756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. F. Moore, N. T. Heiderstadt, E. Huang, N. L. Howell, Z.-Q. Wang, H. M. Siragy, and R. M. Carey
Selective Inhibition of the Renal Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor Increases Blood Pressure in Conscious Rats
Hypertension, May 1, 2001; 37(5): 1285 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Burnier
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers
Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 904 - 912.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin
Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Mifune, H. Sasamura, R. Shimizu-Hirota, H. Miyazaki, and T. Saruta
Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors Stimulate Collagen Synthesis in Cultured Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, November 1, 2000; 36(5): 845 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
M. de Gasparo, K. J. Catt, T. Inagami, J. W. Wright, and Th. Unger
International Union of Pharmacology. XXIII. The Angiotensin II Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2000; 52(3): 415 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. S. Pachori, H. Wang, C. H. Gelband, C. M. Ferrario, M. J. Katovich, and M. K. Raizada
Inability to Induce Hypertension in Normotensive Rat Expressing AT1 Receptor Antisense
Circ. Res., June 9, 2000; 86(11): 1167 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B.-S. Tea, S. Der Sarkissian, R. M. Touyz, P. Hamet, and D. deBlois
Proapoptotic and Growth-Inhibitory Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats In Vivo
Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35(5): 1069 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Q. N. Diep, J.-S. Li, and E. L. Schiffrin
In Vivo Study of AT1 and AT2 Angiotensin Receptors in Apoptosis in Rat Blood Vessels
Hypertension, October 1, 1999; 34(4): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Z. Cao, R. Dean, L. Wu, D. Casley, and M. E. Cooper
Role of Angiotensin Receptor Subtypes in Mesenteric Vascular Proliferation and Hypertrophy
Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffrin, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Schiffrin, E. L.