(Hypertension. 1998;31:516.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Departments of Medicine (R.K.D., D.G.G., Z.M.) and Pharmacology (E.K.J.), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
Correspondence to Dr. Raghvendra K. Dubey, Center for Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine 623 Scaife Hall, 200 Lothrop Street, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2582. E-Mail: dubey{at}novell2.dept-med.pitt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: adenosine smooth muscle cells hypertension atherosclerosis restenosis proliferation hyperplasia extracellular matrix collagen
Abbreviations: DMEM = Dulbeccos Modified Eagle Medium ECM = extracellular matrix FCS = fetal calf serum HBSS = Hanks balanced salt solution HASMCs = human aortic SMCs PBS = phosphate buffered saline SMC = smooth muscle cell
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this regard, adenosine may be an important factor. Vascular SMCs,2 fibroblasts,3 cardiomyocytes,4 and endothelial cells, both vascular5 and cardiac,6 have several metabolic pathways for generating large amounts of adenosine. Moreover, we have recently shown that vascular SMCs can also synthesize adenosine from exogenous cAMP.7 Taken together, these findings suggest that substantial amounts of adenosine are synthesized locally within the vessel wall, thus assuring pharmacologically active levels of adenosine in the vasculature. Since both exogenous and SMC-derived adenosine inhibits fetal calf serum (FCS)-induced growth of rat aortic SMCs,2,7,8 we hypothesize that adenosine may similarly protect against vasoocclusive disorders in humans by regulating SMC growth and maintaining vascular homeostasis.
Accordingly, the aims of the present study were to determine: (1) whether exogenous adenosine inhibits proliferation and collagen synthesis by human aortic SMCs (HASMCs); (2) whether specific adenosine receptor subtype(s) are involved in mediating any inhibitory effects of adenosine on proliferation and collagen synthesis by HASMCs; (3) whether HASMCs synthesize adenosine; and (4) whether HASMC-derived adenosine can effectively inhibit proliferation and collagen synthesis by HASMCs.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cell Culture
Arterial SMC cultured from adult thoracic aortas were obtained from male (n=4) normal donor heart transplants. The cells were cultured by the explant method and cultured as described in detail previously.9 Briefly described, the medial layer of the aorta was removed surgically under the microscope, and minsed sections of this layer were suspended in culture medium (DMEM/F12 supplemented with penicillin [100 U/mL], streptomycin [100µg/mL], NaHCO3 [13mmol/L] and HEPES [25mmol/L]) containing 10% FCS, plated in tissue-culture flasks (75cm2) and incubated under standard tissue culture conditions. The SMCs grew as explants from the medial tissue and were confluent in 12 to 14 days. Confluent monolayers of SMCs were dislodged by treatment with 0.25% trypsin-EDTA solution (GIBCO) and passaged further. SMC purity was characterized by immunofluorescence staining with smooth-muscle-specific antismooth muscle
-actin monoclonal antibodies and by morphologic criteria specific for SMC as described in detail previously.8 SMCs in 3rd and 4th passage were used for all the studies.
DNA Synthesis Studies
3H-thymidine incorporation studies were done to investigate the effects of agents on FCS-induced DNA synthesis. HASMCs were plated at a density of 2.5x104 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture dishes and allowed to grow for 48 hours in DMEM/F12 containing 10% FCS under standard tissue culture conditions. The HASMCs were then growth arrested by feeding DMEM containing 0.4% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) for 48 hours. Growth was stimulated by treating growth arrested HASMCs for 20 hours with DMEM supplemented with 2.5% FCS and containing or lacking the following: (1) adenosine, (2) Cl-Ad (an analog of adenosine that is not metabolized and mediates its effects via both A1 and A2 receptors10), (3) CPA (an adenosine agonist that mediates its effects selectively via A1 receptors10), (4) CGS21680 (an adenosine agonist that mediates its effects selectively via A2A receptors10), (5) NECA (an adenosine agonist that mediates its effects via both A1 and A2 receptors10), (6) MECA (an adenosine agonist with affinity for both A1 and A2 receptors3), (7) Cl-Ad plus DPCPX (a selective A1 receptor antagonist10), (8) Cl-Ad plus KF17837 (a selective A2 receptor antagonist3), (9) Cl-Ad plus DPSPX (a nonselective A1/A2 adenosine receptor antagonist3), (10) EHNA (an inhibitor of adenosine deaminase3), (11) DIP (an inhibitor of adenosine transport3), (12) IDO (an inhibitor of adenosine kinase3), (13) EHNA plus DIP, (14) EHNA plus IDO, (15) DIP plus IDO, (16) DIP plus IDO plus EHNA, (17) KF17837, (18) EHNA plus KF17837, (19) DIP plus KF17837, (20) DPSPX, (21) EHNA plus DPSPX, (22) DIP plus DPSPX, (23) DPCPX, (24) EHNA plus DPCPX, or (25) DIP plus DPSPX. After 20 hours of incubation, the cells were pulsed with 3H-thymidine (1 µCi/mL) for an additional 4 hours. The experiments were terminated by washing the cells twice with Dulbeccos phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and twice with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (10%). The precipitate was solubilized in 500 µL of 0.3N NaOH and 0.1% SDS after incubation at 50°C for 2 hours. Aliquots from 4 wells for each treatment with 10mL scintillation fluid were counted in a liquid scintillation counter and each experiment was conducted using 4 separate cultures.
Cell Proliferation Studies
Trypsinized HASMCs in third passage were suspended in DMEM/ F12 containing 10% FCS and plated in a 24-well culture dish at a density of 1x104 cells/well. After incubation for 18 hours, the cells were fed DMEM containing 0.25% FCS for 48 hours to growth arrest the cells. To study the effects of exogenous and endogenous adenosine on FCS induced cytokinesis, we treated growth-arrested HASMCs every 24 hours for 4 days with DMEM supplemented with 2.5% FCS and containing or lacking various treatments, as described above for DNA synthesis. The treatments were terminated on day 5 and cells dislodged with trypsin-EDTA, diluted in Isoton-II and counted with a Coulter counter. Aliquots from three wells were counted for each group, and 4 separate cultures were used for each group.
Collagen Synthesis Studies
3H-proline incorporation studies were done to investigate the effects of agents on FCS-induced collagen synthesis. HASMCs grown to confluency in 24-well culture dishes were made quiescent by feeding DMEM containing 0.4% bovine serum albumin for 48 hours. To study the effects of exogenous and HASMC-derived adenosine on collagen synthesis we treated growth arrested HASMCs for 36 hours with DMEM supplemented with 2.5% FCS and 3H-L-proline (1 µCi/mL), and containing or lacking various treatments, as described above for the DNA synthesis. The experiments were terminated by washing the cells twice with PBS and twice with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (10%). The precipitate was solubilized in 500 µL of 0.3N NaOH and 0.1% SDS after incubation at 50°C for 2 hours. Aliquots from 4 wells for each treatment were counted in a scintillation counter. Each experiment was conducted with 4 separate cultures. To confirm that the decrease in collagen synthesis was not due to a decrease in cell number, the experiments were conducted in confluent monolayers of cells in which changes in cell number were precluded. Cell counting was performed in cells treated in parallel to the cells used for the collagen synthesis, and the data were normalized to cell number.
Adenosine Synthesis Studies
Monolayers of HASMCs (3x passage) grown to confluence in 12-well culture plates were washed twice with PBS and then incubated with buffered (HEPES 25mmol/L, NaHCO3 13mmol/L) PBS-containing or PBS-lacking EHNA, DIP, IDO, EHNA plus DIP, EHNA plus IDO, DIP plus IDO, or DIP plus IDO plus EHNA. After 4 hours of incubation, the supernatants were collected and adenosine levels were estimated. To evaluate whether HASMCs catabolize adenosine, we assayed the levels of adenosine in the medium of confluent monolayers of HASMCs treated for 4 hours with exogenous adenosine in the presence and absence of EHNA, IDO, or EHNA plus IDO. Following the collection of supernatants, the monolayers of cells were inspected microscopically for intactness, the number of cells were counted, and the data were normalized to cell number.
Adenosine Analysis
Adenosine levels in the samples were analysed by gradient elution using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described.2,3 Adenosine levels were quantified as the area under the chromatographic peak, and the absolute amount in each sample was calculated from a standard curve of adenosine.
Statistics
All growth and adenosine synthesis experiments were performed in triplicates or quadriplicates with 4 seperate cultures, and all data are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA, paired Students t-test, or Fishers least significant difference test, as appropriate. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
FCS (2.5%) induced proliferation (cell number) of growth-arrested HASMCs by 9-fold to 11-fold (P<.05; data not shown). Adenosine and Cl-Ad inhibited FCS-induced increase in cell number in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1B; P<.05). Similar to the effects on DNA synthesis, Cl-Ad, the stable analog of adenosine, was more potent in inhibiting cell proliferation as compared to adenosine (P<.05). The lowest concentrations of adenosine and Cl-Ad which inhibited cell proliferation were 0.1nmol/L.
Treatment with 2.5% FCS stimulated proline incorporation by 6-fold to 8-fold (P<.001 versus 0.25% FCS; data not shown). Treatment of HASMCs with adenosine (10µmol/L) and Cl-Ad (10µmol/L) inhibited FCS-induced proline incorporation (Fig 1C; P<.05). Compared with adenosine, Cl-Ad was more potent in inhibiting FCS-induced proline incorporation (Fig 1C; P<.05).
As shown in Fig 2A, the inhibitory effects of adenosine on DNA synthesis were significantly enhanced in presence of EHNA, and EHNA and IDO significantly increased the recovery of exogenous adenosine added to the medium (Fig 2B). Moreover, in HASMCs treated with EHNA plus IDO, almost all of the exogenously added adenosine was recovered in the medium (Fig 2B).
|
Treatment of quiescent HASMCs with EHNA, DIP, and IDO inhibited FCS-induced thymidine incorporation and cell number in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 3; P<.001). The lowest concentrations of EHNA, DIP, and IDO that significantly inhibited FCS-induced thymidine incorporation were 10µmol/L, .001 µmol/L, and .001 µmol/L, respectively. A 50% decrease in FCS (2.5%)-induced thymidine incorporation by EHNA, DIP, and IDO was observed at
50µmol/L, 0.5 µmol/L, and 0.5 µmol/L, respectively. Similar to DNA synthesis and cell number, treatment of HASMCs with EHNA, IDO, and DIP significantly inhibited FCS-induced proline incorporation (Fig 4C). EHNA significantly enhanced the inhibitory effects of DIP and IDO on FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (Fig 4A), cell number (Fig 4B), and proline incorporation (Fig 4C). IDO significantly increased the inhibitory effects of DIP on thymidine incorporation, cell number, and proline incorporation. Moreover, in HASMCs treated with EHNA (10µmol/L) plus IDO (1 µmol/L) plus DIP (0.1 µmol/L), FCS-induced thymidine and proline incorporation and cell number were reduced to almost basal levels (Fig 4A, 4B and 4C).
|
|
In samples drawn at time zero, adenosine levels were nondetectable; however, the levels of adenosine were significantly increased in the medium of HASMCs collected after 4 hours of incubation and were 4.8±0.5nmol/L/106 cells (P<.001). Treatment of HASMCs with EHNA significantly increased the levels of adenosine in the medium to 89±8 nmol/L/106 cells (P<.001), an increase of
1800% (Fig 4D). Similar to EHNA, treatment of HASMCs with DIP and IDO also increased the levels of adenosine in the medium (P<.05; Fig 4D). Moreover, in HASMCs treated with EHNA plus IDO, the levels of adenosine were increased from 88±8 nmol/L/106 cells and 8±0.1 nmol/L/106 cells in HASMCs treated with EHNA and IDO, respectively, to 1880±56 nmol/L/106 cells in HASMCs treated with EHNA+IDO, a 21-fold and 235-fold increase. In HASMCs treated with EHNA+IDO+DIP, the levels were also increased dramatically but were comparable to those observed in HASMCs treated with EHNA+IDO (Fig 4D).
High (10-4 mol/L), but not low, concentrations of CPA inhibited FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (Fig 5) and cell proliferation (Fig 5). CGS21680 had little effect on FCS-induced thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation. NECA was more potent than CPA but less potent than Cl-Ad in inhibiting FCS-induced thymidine incorporation (Fig 5) and cell proliferation (Fig 5). MECA was more potent than NECA, CPA, and CGS21680 and as potent as Cl-Ad in inhibiting FCS-induced thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation. Cl-Ad inhibited thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation by 50% at a concentration of 5 and 1 µmol/L, respectively. At this concentration, CGS21680, CPA, NECA, and MECA inhibited DNA synthesis by approximately 6%, 21%, 28% and 50%, respectively.
|
With respect to the effects on collagen synthesis, we compared the effects of equimolar concentrations (10 µmol/L) of adenosine, Cl-Ad, CGS21680, CPA, NECA and MECA. Concentrations at which CPA and CGS21680 mediate receptor-specific pharmacological actions (1 nmol/L) did not inhibit FCS-induced collagen synthesis. However, 10µmol/L of CPA and CGS21680 inhibited FCS-induced collagen synthesis (Fig 5). As compared to CGS21680 and CPS, NECA (10 µmol/L) was more potent in inhibiting collagen synthesis; however, it was significantly less potent than Cl-Ad and MECA, which inhibited collagen synthesis by 41% and 38%, respectively (Fig 5C).
KF17837 and DPSPX, but not DPCPX, significantly reversed the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad on FCS-induced thymidine (Fig 6; P<.05) and proline (Fig 6; P<.05) incorporation. The inhibitory effects of EHNA, DIP, and IDO on FCS-induced thymidine and proline incorporation were significantly attenuated by KF17837 and DPSPX, but not by DPCPX (Fig 7).
|
|
To confirm that cell-death did not occur during various treatments and did not contribute to the observed inhibitory effects of the agents used in this study, trypan blue exclusion tests were carried out. At the concentrations used in this study, there was no loss in viability of cells treated with the various agents.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our observation that CPA (an adenosine analog which is highly selective for A1 receptors10 and mediates its effects at pharmacologically low doses [10-9 mol/L and lower]) was unable to inhibit FCS-induced growth and collagen synthesis by HASMC at low concentrations suggests that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are not mediated via A1 receptors. This conclusion is further supported by our observation that DPCPX, an adenosine receptor antagonist that is a 700-fold selective for A1 receptors,10 was unable to block the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad on FCS-induced growth and collagen synthesis by HASMCs.
The observations that pretreatment of HASMCs with KF17837, a selective inhibitor of A2 adenosine receptors,3 and DPSPX, an A1/A2 adenosine receptor antagonist,3 but not DPCPX, a selective A1 receptor antagonist,10 effectively reversed the inhibitory effects of Cl-Ad on DNA and collagen synthesis suggest that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are A2 receptor mediated. This conclusion is corroborated by the observations that MECA, an adenosine agonist with high affinity for A2 receptors,3 was as effective as Cl-Ad in inhibiting DNA as well as collagen synthesis by HASMC and NECA.
Our contention that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated via A2B receptors is supported by the recently proposed and endorsed subclassification of A2A and A2B receptors.10 Gurden et al11 have recently demonstrated that the relative potencies of CGS21680 and NECA can be used as a reference to differentiate A2A from either A2B or A1 receptors. When the effects of CGS21680 are as potent as NECA, this implicates the A2A receptor. However, when CGS21680 is much less potent than NECA, this indicates that the observed effects are mediated via activation of the A2B receptor subtype. In the present study, compared with CGS21680, NECA was more effective in mimicking the inhibitory effects of adenosine, which further substantiates our conclusion that the inhibitory effects of adenosine are mediated via A2B receptor.
Stimulation of HASMCs with adenosine has been shown to elevate cAMP levels, and cAMP in turn has antiproliferative effects on SMCs.7 Since A2 receptors are positively coupled with adenylyl cyclase and their activation results in a significant increase in cAMP levels,10 the inhibitory effects of adenosine on HASMC growth are most likely mediated largely via the second messenger cAMP. However, the participation of other mechanism(s) cannot be ruled out. Activation of A2 receptors by adenosine stimulates NO release from endothelial cells,12 and we have recently observed that adenosine via A2B receptors stimulates NO release from rat aortic SMCs.13 Since NO inhibits SMC proliferation,1 this provides an additional pathway via which adenosine could inhibit HASMC growth.
Elimination of adenosine from the interstitial space is mediated by facilitated transport of adenosine into cells and also by the metabolism of adenosine to inosine by adenosine deaminase,3,14 as well as by the metabolism of adenosine to adenosine monophosphate by adenosine kinase.3,14 Inhibition of the enzyme adenosine deaminase by EHNA and the enzyme adenosine kinase by IDO, as well as inhibition of adenosine transport and metabolism by DIP, has been shown to increase endogenous levels of adenosine.3,6,14 Hence, these three compounds were used in the present study to increase endogenous levels of adenosine so as to evaluate the effects of endogenously generated adenosine on FCS-induced growth.
Treatment of HASMCs with EHNA, IDO, and DIP elevated the levels of adenosine in the culture medium. Thus, the present study demonstrates that cultured HASMCs synthesize adenosine. In HASMCs treated with both EHNA plus IDO, the adenosine levels increased by more than 392-fold. This suggests that both adenosine deaminase and adenosine kinase regulate adenosine elimination in HASMCs. Direct evidence for this notion comes from our observation that, when HASMCs were treated with exogenous adenosine, only a fraction of adenosine, close to basal levels, was recovered in the medium. However, in the presence of EHNA plus IDO, but not in presence of EHNA or IDO alone, a dramatic increase in the recovery of adenosine was observed.
The inhibitory effects of EHNA, DIP, and IDO on DNA and collagen synthesis were significantly reversed by KF17837 and DPSPX. In contrast, DPCPX did not reverse the inhibitory effects of EHNA, DIP, and IDO on HASMCs. These observations provide proof for our contention that the inhibitory effects of these modulators of endogenous adenosine on HASMC-growth are mediated via generation of endogenous adenosine and via A2 receptors.
Can our in vitro findings be extrapolated to physiological situations in vivo and can adenosine prevent HASMC growth in vivo? Our finding that low concentrations of adenosine were able to inhibit HASMC growth in the presence, but not absence, of EHNA suggests that, although adenosine effectively inhibits HASMC growth, its effects are underestimated in the current series of experiments, as they were conducted in the presence of FCS, which contains adenosine deaminase. Under physiological conditions in vivo, most of the adenosine deaminase is localized within cells,14 and adenosine in the extracellular compartment will be available in active form to mediate the physiological inhibitory effects on HASMC growth. Additionally, since adenosine is synthesized by HASMCs2,7 as well as endothelial cells,6 via multiple pathways, this would ensure pharmacologically active, steady-state levels of adenosine locally at the interface between endothelial and SMCs. In contrast, pathological conditions associated with decreased adenosine synthesis or increased adenosine deaminase leakage would reduce the pharmacologically active levels of adenosine, and this would result in decreased anti-growth effects of adenosine. Indeed, data from our laboratory suggests that adenosine deaminase may participatre in at least two disease states associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, ie, sickle cell anemia and aging/hypertension.15 However, future studies are needed to confirm or deny this role of adenosine deaminase.
In conclusion, we provide evidence that HASMCs synthesize adenosine and that both exogenous and HASMC-derived adenosine inhibit FCS-induced growth of and collagen synthesis by HASMCs. Our findings suggest, but do not prove, that adenosine produced by HASMCs may play a role as a local anti-growth agent and that decreased synthesis of adenosine by HASMCs or increased catabolism of adenosine by adenosine deaminase or adenosine kinase may contribute to the abnormal deposition of the extracellular matrix protein and growth of HASMCs in disease states, such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and restenosis. Agents that elevate endogenous adenosine could be clinically important in preventing abnormal deposition of ECM proteins by, and proliferation of, HASMCs in coronary heart disease, thus exerting beneficial effects on coronary vascular structure.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received September 17, 1997; first decision October 14, 1997; accepted October 24, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Suzuki F, Jackson EK. Smooth muscle cell-derived adenosine inhibits cell growth.
Hypertension. 1996;
27
(pt 2): 766
773.
3. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Mi Z, Jackson EK. Exogenous and endogenous adenosine inhibits fetal calf serum-induced growth of rat cardiac fibroblasts: role of A2B receptors.
Circulation. 1997;
96
: 2656
2666.
4. Meghji P, Pearson JD, Slakey LL. Regulation of extracellular adenosine production by ectonucleotidases of adult rat ventricular myocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 1992; 263 : H40 H47.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Smolenski RT, Kochan Z, McDouall R, Page C, Seymour AL, Yacoub MH. Endothelial nucleotide catabolism and adenosine production.
Cardiovasc Res. 1994;
28
: 100
104.
6. Mullane K, Bullough D. Harnessing an endogenous cardioprotective mechanism: cellular sources and sites of action of adenosine. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995; 27 : 1041 1054.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Dubey RK, Mi Z, Gillespie DG, Jackson EK. Cyclic AMP-adenosine pathway inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth.
Hypertension. 1996;
28
: 765
771.
8. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Osaka K, Suzuki F, Jackson EK. Adenosine inhibits growth of rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Possible role of A2b receptor.
Hypertension. 1996;
27
(pt 2): 786
793.
9. Ross R, Kariya B. Morphogenesis of vascular smooth muscle in atherosclerosis and cell culture. In: Bohr DF, Somlyo AP, Sparks HV, eds. Handbook of Physiology: The Cardiovascular System II. Circulation, Vascular Smooth Muscle. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society; 69 91.
10. Dalziel HH, Westfall DP, Receptors for adenine nucleotides and nucleosides: subclassification, distribution, and molecular characterization. Pharmacol Rev. 1994; 46 : 449 466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Gurden MF, Coates J, Ellis F, Evans B, Foster M, Hornby E, Kennedy I, Martin DP, Strong P, Vardey CJ, Wheeldon A. Functional characterization of three adenosine receptor types. Br J Pharmacol. 1993; 109 : 693 698.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Li J-M, Fenton RA, Cutler BS, Dobson JG Jr. Adenosine enhances nitric oxide production by vascular endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1995; 269 : C519 C523.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Dubey RK, Gillespie DG, Jackson EK. Adenosine induces nitric oxide synthesis in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1996; 28 : 552 . Abstract.
14. Jackson EK, Koehler M, Mi Z, Dubey RK, Tofovic SP, Carcillo JA, Jones GS. Possible role of adenosine deaminase in vaso-occlusive diseases. J Hypertens. 1996; 14 : 19 29.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Tofovic SP, Kusaka H, Li P, Jackson EK. Effects of adenosine deaminase inhibition on blood pressure in old spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1998 (in press).
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. S. Dixon, G. J. Beck, M. A. Vazquez, A. Greenberg, J. A. Delmez, M. Allon, L. M. Dember, J. Himmelfarb, J. J. Gassman, T. Greene, et al. Effect of Dipyridamole plus Aspirin on Hemodialysis Graft Patency N. Engl. J. Med., May 21, 2009; 360(21): 2191 - 2201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Yang, M. Koupenova, D. J. McCrann, K. J. Kopeikina, H. M. Kagan, B. M. Schreiber, and K. Ravid The A2b adenosine receptor protects against vascular injury PNAS, January 15, 2008; 105(2): 792 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson, Z. Mi, and R. K. Dubey The Extracellular cAMP-Adenosine Pathway Significantly Contributes to the in Vivo Production of Adenosine J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Yang, D. P. Thomas, X. Zhang, B. W. Culver, B. M. Alexander, W. J. Murdoch, M. N.A. Rao, D. A. Tulis, J. Ren, and N. Sreejayan Curcumin Inhibits Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Stimulated Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Function and Injury-Induced Neointima Formation Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 85 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-H. Kang, S.-K. Park, I.-K. Lee, and R. J. Johnson Uric Acid-Induced C-Reactive Protein Expression: Implication on Cell Proliferation and Nitric Oxide Production of Human Vascular Cells J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2005; 16(12): 3553 - 3562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. P. H. Leung, R. Y. K. Man, and C.-M. Tse D-Glucose upregulates adenosine transport in cultured human aortic smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): H2756 - H2762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Shen, S. P. Halenda, M. Sturek, and P. A. Wilden Novel Mitogenic Effect of Adenosine on Coronary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells: Role for the A1 Adenosine Receptor Circ. Res., May 13, 2005; 96(9): 982 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pawelczyk, M. Podgorska, and M. Sakowicz The Effect of Insulin on Expression Level of Nucleoside Transporters in Diabetic Rats Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2003; 63(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ahn, R. Morishita, Y. Kaneda, S.-J. Lee, K.-Y. Kwon, S.-Y. Choi, K.-U. Lee, J.-Y. Park, I.-J. Moon, J.-G. Park, et al. Inhibitory Effects of Novel AP-1 Decoy Oligodeoxynucleotides on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Proliferation In Vitro and Neointimal Formation In Vivo Circ. Res., June 28, 2002; 90(12): 1325 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Burnstock Purinergic Signaling and Vascular Cell Proliferation and Death Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2002; 22(3): 364 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Fredholm, A. P. IJzerman, K. A. Jacobson, K.-N. Klotz, and J. Linden International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2001; 53(4): 527 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. K. Jackson and R. K. Dubey Role of the extracellular cAMP-adenosine pathway in renal physiology Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2001; 281(4): F597 - F612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Mundell, M. E. Olah, R. A. Panettieri Jr., J. L. Benovic, and R. B. Penn Regulation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Adenylyl Cyclase Responsiveness in Human Airway Smooth Muscle by Exogenous and Autocrine Adenosine Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2001; 24(2): 155 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. TAKEZAKO, K. NODA, E. TSUJI, M. KOGA, M. SASAGURI, and K. ARAKAWA Adenosine Activates Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase Activity in the Kidney and Increases Dopamine J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2001; 12(1): 29 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mattig and A. Deussen Significance of adenosine metabolism of coronary smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2001; 280(1): H117 - H124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-W. Gu, B. R. Ito, A. Sartin, N. Frascogna, M. Moore, and T. H. Adair Inhibition of adenosine kinase induces expression of VEGF mRNA and protein in myocardial myoblasts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2000; 279(5): H2116 - H2123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Rubin, L. R. Johnson, J. R. Dodam, A. K. Dhalla, L. Magliola, M. H. Laughlin, and A. W. Jones Selective transport of adenosine into porcine coronary smooth muscle Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2000; 279(3): H1397 - H1410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Andresen, D. G. Gillespie, Z. Mi, R. K. Dubey, and E. K. Jackson Role of Adenosine A1 Receptors in Modulating Extracellular Adenosine Levels J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1999; 291(1): 76 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Y. Saadjian, F. Paganelli, M. L. Reynaud Gaubert, S. Levy, and R. P. Guieu Adenosine plasma concentration in pulmonary hypertension Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 1999; 43(1): 228 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Auchampach and R. Bolli Adenosine receptor subtypes in the heart: therapeutic opportunities and challenges Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 1999; 276(3): H1113 - H1116. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson Adenosine Inhibits Collagen and Total Protein Synthesis in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 190 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Dubey, D. G. Gillespie, and E. K. Jackson Adenosine Inhibits Collagen and Protein Synthesis in Cardiac Fibroblasts : Role of A2B Receptors Hypertension, April 1, 1998; 31(4): 943 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |