This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kagiyama, S. Articles by Fujishima, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kagiyama, S. Articles by Fujishima, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB (L)-ARGININE NITRIC OXIDE

(Hypertension. 1998;31:1030-1034.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Scientific Contributions

Enhanced Depressor Response to Nitric Oxide in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

Shuntaro Kagiyama; Takuya Tsuchihashi; Isao Abe; ; Masatoshi Fujishima

From the Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to Shuntaro Kagiyama, MD, Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3–1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812–8582, Japan. E-mail kagiyama{at}intmed2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abstract—Possible impairment of the L-arginine–nitric oxide (NO) pathway in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of adult spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) was investigated by microinjecting N^G-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), NOC 18 (an NO donor), or L-arginine. Unilateral injection of L-NAME (10 nmol/50 nL) into the rostral ventrolateral medulla significantly increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) in both SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). The increases in MAP did not differ significantly between the two strains (15±3 versus 10±2 mm Hg, respectively; n=8). In contrast, microinjection of L-arginine elicited significant (P<.05) dose-dependent decreases in MAP in both strains, and these depressor responses were significantly greater in SHR than in WKY (in 10 nmol of L-arginine: –29±2 versus –15±2 mm Hg, respectively; n=8, P<.01). Similarly, microinjection of NOC 18 (10 nmol/50 nL) reduced MAP in both strains, and the depressor response was also significantly greater in SHR than in WKY (–38±7 versus –22±3 mm Hg, respectively; n=8, P<.05). These results suggest that the L-arginine–NO pathway in the rostral ventrolateral medulla is impaired in SHR and that this impairment may contribute to the increase in arterial pressure in this animal model of genetic hypertension.

Key Words: L-arginine • NOC 18 • L-NAME • medulla oblongata • microinjection

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
The release of NO from endothelial cells reduces smooth muscle tone and regulates arterial pressure,^{1 2} whereas the intravenous injection of NOS inhibitors increases arterial pressure.³ This latter effect has been thought to result mainly from the vasoconstriction caused by deprivation of endothelial NO. However, NO is also produced from L-arginine in other cell types, including neurons in the brain.^{1 4} Although evidence suggests that NO within the central nervous system plays an important role in cardiovascular regulation,^{5 6} few studies have examined the role of central NO in genetically hypertensive rats. Cabrera et al⁷ reported that the central depressor action of endogenous NO was deficient in genetic hypertension. Because NOS is localized in discrete neuronal populations throughout the brain,⁸ several regions may be the candidates for the altered L-arginine–NO pathway within the brain of genetically hypertensive rats. In the RVLM, which is one of the important regions for cardiovascular regulation,⁹ NOS exists¹⁰ and the role of endogenous NO in the regulation of arterial pressure has been reported.^{11 12 13 14} Thus, we hypothesized that endogenous L-arginine–NO pathway might be altered in the RVLM of SHR. To address this issue, we microinjected an NOS inhibitor or L-arginine into the RVLM. We also microinjected an NO donor to assess the direct action of NO on the RVLM neurons.

	Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Animal Preparation
All experiments were performed with adult male SHR/Izm (12 to 14 weeks old; body weight, 290±5 g; n=22) and age-matched WKY/Izm (body weight, 324±6 g; n=22) obtained from the Disease Model Cooperative Research Association (Kyoto, Japan).¹⁵ The experimental protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University.

All rats were anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg IP, supplemented with 100 mg/kg IV, if necessary). A polyethylene cannula (PE-50) was inserted into the right femoral vein for drug administration. MAP was measured directly with a cannula inserted in the right femoral artery and connected to a pressure transducer (P50; Gould Statham Instruments). HR was monitored with a cardiotachometer (model 1332; NEC San-ei), and body temperature was monitored with a rectal probe and was maintained at 37.0°±0.5°C with a heating pad.

Anesthetized rats were placed in the supine position with the head fixed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments). The trachea and the esophagus were transected in the lower neck and reflected rostrally. The distal trachea was cannulated to facilitate ventilation. After retraction of the bilateral longus capitis muscles, the inferior occipital bone was removed to provide a window (5x6 mm) to the surface of the ventral medulla oblongata. After incision and retraction of the dura, the ventral surface of the medulla was kept moist with either aCSF (in mmol/L: NaCl 133.3, KCl 3.4, CaCl₂ 1.3, MgCl₂ 1.2, NaH₂PO₄ 0.6, NaHCO₃ 32.0, and glucose 3.4, pH 7.4) or endogenous cerebrospinal fluid. Paralysis was induced with d-tubocurarine (0.8 mg/kg IV); the tracheal cannula was then connected to a ventilator (model 681D; Harvard Apparatus) and the rats were artificially ventilated at a rate of 60 strokes per minute with a tidal volume of 3.0 mL. The adequacy of anesthesia was verified by the absence of withdrawal response to nociceptive stimulation of lower extremities before the injection of d-tubocurarine and by the stability of MAP and HR after paralysis had been induced.

Microinjection Procedure
Four-barreled micropipettes with tip diameters of 20 to 50 µm and made from calibrated microbore capillary glass tubing (Accu-Fill 90; Clay Adams) were used for microinjection of drugs. Drugs were injected in a volume of 50 nL over a 15-second period with a hand-held syringe. The injection volume was measured by observing the movement of the fluid meniscus along the reticle of a microscope.

The RVLM was identified by injection of L-glutamate (2 nmol/50 nL) on the following criteria: (1) the increase in MAP occurred 5 seconds after injection of L-glutamate, (2) the response plateau occurred within 20 seconds of microinjection, and (3) the change in MAP was 20 mm Hg. The RVLM injection sites were located 0.6 to 1.0 mm rostral to the most rostral rootlet of the hypoglossal nerve, 1.7 to 1.9 mm lateral to the midline, and 0.5 to 0.8 mm below the ventral surface.

The compounds microinjected into the RVLM were L-NAME (an NOS inhibitor), D-NAME (an inactive isomer of L-NAME), NOC 18 {(C₂H₅)₂N[N(O)NO]Na, which spontaneously releases NO}, L-arginine (a precursor of NO), D-arginine (an inactive isomer of L-arginine), and aCSF as a vehicle control. After verifying the RVLM by L-glutamate, only one agent was injected in the unilateral RVLM. After sufficient time for recovery, another injection was similarly performed in the contralateral RVLM. Thus, two different drugs were unilaterally injected in a randomized order in a rat. NOC 18 was obtained from Dojindo Laboratories, L-NAME and D-NAME from Wako, and L-glutamate, L-arginine, and D-arginine from Sigma Chemical Co. NOC 18 was dissolved in 0.1 mol/L NaOH and frozen at -20°C as a stock solution; after the pH of the stock solution was adjusted with 1 mol/L HCl to 7.4, the final solution was prepared by dilution with aCSF. Because NOC 18 releases NO in a linear manner for at least 1 hour, microinjections were performed within 1 hour of preparation of the final solution. All other drugs were dissolved directly in aCSF.

Histological Analysis
In some experiments, Alcian blue dye (50 nL) was injected from a separate barrel of the pipette. At the end of these experiments, the rats were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (50 mg IV) and perfused transcardially with 150 mL of 0.9% NaCl followed by 150 mL of 10% phosphate-buffered formaldehyde solution. The brain stem was sectioned (50 µm) in the coronal plane and stained with neutral red. Microinjection sites were identified by the deposition of Alcian blue dye and referred to standard anatomic structures of the caudal brain stem according to the atlas of Paxinos and Watson.¹⁶

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM and are expressed as the difference from baseline values. One-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons by Dunnett's multiple range test, was used in the analysis of the dose response to L-arginine in each strain. Differences in dose response between the strain were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Other statistical analyses were performed with Student's unpaired t test. A value of P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
Baseline MAP was significantly higher in SHR than in WKY (113±2 versus 76±1 mm Hg, P<.01). Baseline HR was similar in both strains (364±5 and 381±6 bpm, respectively). Injection of L-glutamate into the RVLM increased MAP and HR in both SHR (33±1 mm Hg and 27±2 bpm, respectively) and WKY (26±1 mm Hg and 27±2 bpm, respectively). This pressor response was significantly (P<.01) greater in SHR than in WKY.

L-NAME (10 nmol) significantly increased MAP and HR in both SHR and WKY, whereas D-NAME (10 nmol) had no effect on MAP and HR (Fig 1). The pressor responses to L-NAME did not differ significantly between the two strains.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Effects of microinjection of L-NAME (n=8), D-NAME (n=6), or aCSF (n=8) into the RVLM of SHR (solid bars) and WKY (open bars) on MAP (A) and HR (B). Each drug (10 nmol) was injected in a volume of 50 nL. Data are mean±SEM. **P<.01 vs aCSF for each strain; P<.05, P<.01.

Microinjection of L-arginine elicited significant dose-dependent reductions of MAP and HR in both SHR and WKY (Fig 2A and Fig 3). The depressor response to either a low dose (3 nmol) or high dose (10 nmol) of L-arginine was significantly greater in SHR than in WKY. D-Arginine (10 nmol) also reduced MAP and HR in both SHR (-11±3 mm Hg and -18±5 bpm, respectively; n=6) and WKY (-11±2 mm Hg and -16±3 bpm, respectively; n=6). The depressor responses to D-arginine were similar between the two strains. Similar to L-arginine, NOC 18 (10 nmol) significantly reduced MAP and HR in both SHR and WKY, and the depressor and bradycardic responses were significantly greater in SHR than in WKY (Fig 2B and Fig 4).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Typical polygraph tracings showing the cardiovascular responses to microinjection of L-arginine (A) and NOC 18 (B) and into the RVLM of SHR (top panels) and WKY (bottom panels). Each drug (10 nmol) was injected in a volume of 50 nL at the time indicated by the horizontal bar.

View larger version (14K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Effects of microinjection of L-arginine or aCSF into the RVLM of SHR (solid bars) and WKY (open bars) on MAP (A) and HR (B). L-Arginine elicited significant (P<.01) dose-dependent decreases in MAP and HR in both strains. Each drug was injected in a volume of 50 nL. Data are mean±SEM (n=8). *P<.05, **P<.01 vs aCSF for each strain; P<.05, P<.01.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Effects of microinjection of NOC 18 or aCSF into the RVLM of SHR (solid bars) and WKY (open bars) on MAP (A) and HR (B). Each drug (10 nmol) was injected in a volume of 50 nL. Data are mean±SEM (n=8). *P<.05, **P<.01 vs aCSF for each strain; P<.05.

Histological examination revealed that the injection sites were located in the area that encompassed the dorsolateral aspect of the lateral paragigantocellular nucleus and the region dorsolateral to this nucleus (Fig 5A). This area is located at the caudal end of the facial nucleus. There was no difference in the distribution of injection sites between SHR and WKY (Fig 5B).

View larger version (76K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Histological section showing the medulla of WKY (A). The arrow indicates the injection site. Diagram (B) shows individual injection sites where microinjections of L-arginine (3 nmol) were made in SHR () and WKY (). Amb indicates nucleus ambiguus; Sol, nucleus tractus solitarii.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
We have shown that the microinjection of an NO precursor or an NO donor into the RVLM evokes depressor responses that are significantly greater in SHR than in WKY.

NO acts as a neuromediator in the central nervous system and plays important roles in a wide variety of processes, including memory,¹⁷ learning,¹⁸ and vision.¹⁹ Intravenous administration of NOS inhibitors increases arterial pressure.^{3 5 20} Because this pressor response is abolished by ganglion blockade²⁰ or cervical spinal cord transection,⁵ NO in the central nervous system appears to play a critical role. However, it remains unclear whether the L-arginine–NO pathway in the central nervous system contributes to the pathogenesis of hypertension. The pressor response to intravenous administration of an NOS inhibitor is smaller in SHR than in WKY.²¹ Because the pressor responses to intravenous injection of NOS inhibitors are similar in SHR and WKY subjected to ganglion blockade^{22 23} or in pithed rats,²⁴ the L-arginine–NO pathway may be impaired in some regions within the central nervous system of SHR. Cabrera et al⁷ showed that the depressor response to intracerebroventricular injection of an NO donor was greater, whereas the pressor response to intracerebroventricular injection of an NOS inhibitor was smaller, in stroke-prone SHR than in normotensive control rats. These researchers concluded that a reduced activity of the L-arginine–NO pathway might contribute to the increased arterial pressure of stroke-prone SHR.

The medulla oblongata is a possible site at which the action of NO might be altered in hypertension. NO in the nucleus tractus solitarii^{13 25} and the RVLM^{11 12 13 14} plays an important role in cardiovascular regulation. Microinjection of NOS inhibitors into the nucleus tractus solitarii, in which the vagal cardiopulmonary afferent fibers terminate,⁹ increased MAP and renal sympathetic nerve activity, whereas NO donors decreased MAP.²⁵ Microinjection of NOS inhibitors in the RVLM increased MAP and renal sympathetic nerve activity,^{11 12 13} and these responses were attenuated by L-arginine¹⁴ or NO donors¹¹ ; conversely, L-arginine reduced MAP and renal sympathetic nerve activity, and these responses were counteracted by NOS inhibitors.¹³ Thus, NO exerts an inhibitory action on RVLM neurons. In the present study, we also observed an increase in MAP in response to L-NAME, and a decrease in MAP in response to L-arginine or NOC 18, in both SHR and WKY. Whereas L-NAME induced similar increases in MAP in SHR and WKY, L-arginine elicited a greater depressor response in SHR than in WKY. The decrease in MAP induced by NOC 18 was also greater in SHR. These observations support the hypothesis that the L-arginine–NO pathway is impaired in the RVLM of SHR. Such a defect in the L-arginine–NO pathway may be attributable to insufficient NOS activity or a deficiency of the substrate, L-arginine. The neuronal NOS gene expression in the RVLM²⁶ or the NOS activity in the brain stem²⁷ has been reported to be comparable between SHR and WKY. In contrast, evidence suggests that a deficiency of L-arginine contributes to hypertension.^{28 29 30} In the present study, the activation of glutamate receptors by microinjection of L-glutamate elicited greater increase in MAP in SHR than in WKY, consistent with our previous observations.³¹ The activation of glutamate receptors stimulates NO production by activation of NOS.³² Given that neuronal NO reduces pressor and sympathoexcitatory responses to L-glutamate,³³ the augmented pressor response to L-glutamate in SHR might be related to the decreased activity of the L-arginine–NO pathway.

The precise cellular mechanism of NO in the RVLM remains unknown. In the paraventricular nucleus, microdialysis of NO-rich aCSF increases local concentrations of inhibitory neurotransmitters, including taurine and GABA, with significant reduction of arterial pressure.³⁴ A recent report suggests that NO mediates GABAergic inhibition elicited by the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and thus contributes to the regulation of neuronal excitability.³⁵ The GABAergic system tonically inhibits the RVLM neurons and this inhibitory action of GABAergic input to the RVLM has been reported to be diminished in SHR.³⁶ Thus, we speculate that the effect of NO in the RVLM may be mediated by the release of GABA, and the impaired L-arginine–NO pathway may lead to the diminished GABAergic input to the RVLM, resulting in the elevation of arterial pressure in SHR.

In the present study, not only L-arginine but also D-arginine reduced arterial pressure. D-Arginine is not a substrate for NO formation, but nonspecific actions of arginine, such as vasodilatory³⁷ and hypotensive effects,³⁸ have been demonstrated. D-Amino acid is detectable in mammalian brain tissues³⁹ and the localization of D-serine correlates with N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the rat brain.⁴⁰ Thus, we may speculate that D-arginine elicits cardiovascular actions as a neuromodulator in the same way as D-serine; in any case, the effect of D-arginine on MAP was similar between SHR and WKY.

In conclusion, the depressor responses to L-arginine or an NO donor injected into the RVLM were greater in SHR than WKY. Thus, a decreased activity of the L-arginine–NO pathway in this brain region may contribute to the increase in arterial pressure in this animal model of genetic hypertension.

	Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms

 

aCSF = artificial cerebrospinal fluid D-NAME = NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester GABA = -aminobutyric acid HR = heart rate L-NAME = NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester MAP = mean arterial pressure NO(S) = nitric oxide (synthase) RVLM = rostral ventrolateral medulla SHR = spontaneously hypertensive rat(s) WKY = Wistar-Kyoto rat(s)

Received May 22, 1997; first decision June 19, 1997; accepted November 19, 1997.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion References

 
1. Palmer RMJ, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature. 1988;333:664–666.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2002–2012.[Free Full Text]

3. Rees DD, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in the regulation of blood pressure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3375–3378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Knowles RG, Palacios M, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Formation of nitric oxide from L-arginine in the central nervous system: a transduction mechanism for stimulation of the soluble guanylate cyclase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:5159–5162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Sakuma I, Togashi H, Yoshioka M, Saito H, Yanagida M, Tamura M, Kobayashi T, Yasuda H, Gross SS, Levi R. N^G-Methyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of L-arginine–derived nitric oxide synthesis, stimulates renal sympathetic nerve activity in vivo: a role for nitric oxide in the central regulation of sympathetic tone? Circ Res. 1992;70:607–611.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Togashi H, Sakuma I, Yoshioka M, Kobayashi T, Yasuda H, Kitabatake A, Saito H, Gross SS, Levi R. A central nervous system action of nitric oxide in blood pressure regulation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;262:343–347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cabrera CL, Bealer SL, Bohr DF. Central depressor action of nitric oxide is deficient in genetic hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1996;9:237–241.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Bredt DS, Hwang PM, Snyder SH. Localization of nitric oxide synthase indicating a neural role for nitric oxide. Nature. 1990;347:768–770.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Spyer KM. Central nervous mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular control. J Physiol (Lond). 1994;474:1–19.[Free Full Text]

10. Iadecola C, Faris PL, Hartman BK, Xu X. Localization of NADPH diaphorase in neurons of the rostral ventral medulla: possible role of nitric oxide in central autonomic regulation and oxygen chemoreception. Brain Res. 1993;603:173–179.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Shapoval LN, Sagach VF, Pobegailo LS. Nitric oxide influences ventrolateral medullary mechanisms of vasomotor control in the cat. Neurosci Lett. 1991;132:47–50.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Zanzinger J, Czachurski J, Seller H. Inhibition of basal and reflex-mediated sympathetic activity in the RVLM by nitric oxide. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:R958–R962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Tseng CJ, Liu HY, Lin HC, Ger LP, Tung CS, Yen MH. Cardiovascular effects of nitric oxide in the brain stem nuclei of rats. Hypertension. 1996;27:36–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Kagiyama S, Tsuchihashi T, Abe I, Fujishima M. Cardiovascular effects of nitric oxide in the rostral ventrolateral medulla of rats. Brain Res. 1997;757:155–158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Nabika T, Nara Y, Ikeda K, Endo J, Yamori Y. Genetic heterogeneity of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 1991;18:12–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Paxinos G, Watson C. The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1986.

17. Bohme GA, Bon C, Stutzmann JM, Doble A, Blanchard JC. Possible involvement of nitric oxide in long-term potentiation. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;199:379–381.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Chapman PF, Atkins CM, Allen MT, Haley JE, Steinmetz JE. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis impairs two different forms of learning. Neuroreport. 1992;3:567–570.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Venturini CM, Knowles RG, Palmer RMJ, Moncada S. Synthesis of nitric oxide in the bovine retina. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;180:920–925.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Lacolley PJ, Lewis SJ, Brody MJ. Role of sympathetic nerve activity in the generation of vascular nitric oxide in urethane-anesthetized rats. Hypertension. 1991;17:881–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Schleiffer R, Pernot F, Van Overloop B, Gairard A. In vivo involvement of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in spontaneously hypertensive rats: effects of N^G-nitro L-arginine methyl ester. J Hypertens. 1991;9(suppl 6):S192–S193.

22. Fozard JR, Part ML. Haemodynamic responses to N^G-monomethyl-L-arginine in spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. Br J Pharmacol. 1991;102:823–826.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Minami N, Imai Y, Hashimoto J, Abe K. Contribution of vascular nitric oxide to basal blood pressure in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive Wistar Kyoto rats. Clin Sci. 1995;89:177–182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Tabrizchi R, Triggle CR. Actions of L- and D-arginine and N^G-monomethyl-L-arginine on the blood pressure of pithed normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1992;A14:527–546.

25. Lewis SJ, Ohta H, Machado B, Bates JN, Talman WT. Microinjection of S-nitrosocysteine into the nucleus tractus solitarii decreases arterial pressure and heart rate via activation of soluble guanylate cyclase. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;202:135–136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Plochocka-Zulinska D, Krukoff TL. Increased gene expression of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in brain of adult spontaneously hypertensive rats. Mol Brain Res. 1997;48:291–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Clavier N, Tobin JR, Kirsch JR, Izuta M, Traystman RJ. Brain nitric oxide synthase activity in normal, hypertensive, and stroke-prone rats. Stroke. 1994;25:1674–1678.[Abstract]

28. Chen PY, Sanders PW. L-Arginine abrogates salt-sensitive hypertension in Dahl/Rapp rats. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:1559–1567.

29. Wakabayashi Y, Yamada E, Yoshida T, Takahashi H. Deficiency of endogenous arginine synthesis provokes hypertension by exhausting substrate arginine for nitric oxide synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;205:1391–1398.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Hasegawa T, Takagi S, Nishimaki K, Morita K, Nakajima S. Impairment of L-arginine metabolism in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Biochem Int. 1992;26:653–658.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Tsuchihashi T, Abe I, Fujishima M. Role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in ventrolateral medulla of hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1994;24:648–652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Okada D. Two pathways of cyclic GMP production through glutamate receptor-mediated nitric oxide synthesis. J Neurochem. 1992;59:1203–1210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Zanzinger J, Czachurski J, Seller H. Neuronal nitric oxide reduces sympathetic excitability by modulation of central glutamate effects in pigs. Circ Res. 1997;80:565–571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Horn TP, Smith PM, McLaughlin BE, Bauce L, Marks GS, Pittman QJ, Ferguson AV. Nitric oxide actions in paraventricular nucleus: cardiovascular and neurochemical implications. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:R306–R313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Bains JS, Ferguson AV. Nitric oxide regulates NMDA-driven GABAergic inputs to type I neurones of the rat paraventricular nucleus. J Physiol (Lond). 1997;499:733–746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Smith JK, Barron KW. GABAergic responses in ventrolateral medulla in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1990;258:R450–R456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Calver A, Collier J, Vallance P. Dilator actions of arginine in human peripheral vasculature. Clin Sci. 1991;81:695–700.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Jun T, Wennmalm Å. L-Arginine-induced hypotension in the rat: evidence that NO synthesis is not involved. Acta Physiol Scand. 1994;152:385–390.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Nagata Y, Yamamoto K, Shimojo T, Konno R, Yasumura Y, Akino T. The presence of free D-alanine, D-proline and D-serine in mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1115:208–211.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Schell MJ, Molliver ME, Snyder SH. D-Serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: Localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3948–3952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L.-C. Kung, S. H. H. Chan, K. L. H. Wu, C.-C. Ou, M.-H. Tai, and J. Y. H. Chan Mitochondrial Respiratory Enzyme Complexes in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla as Cellular Targets of Nitric Oxide and Superoxide Interaction in the Antagonism of Antihypertensive Action of eNOS Transgene Mol. Pharmacol., November 1, 2008; 74(5): 1319 - 1332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kimura, Y. Hirooka, Y. Sagara, K. Ito, T. Kishi, H. Shimokawa, A. Takeshita, and K. Sunagawa Overexpression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla Causes Hypertension and Sympathoexcitation via an Increase in Oxidative Stress Circ. Res., February 4, 2005; 96(2): 252 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Kishi, Y. Hirooka, K. Ito, K. Sakai, H. Shimokawa, and A. Takeshita Cardiovascular Effects of Overexpression of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla in Stroke-Prone Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 264 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zanzinger Role of nitric oxide in the neural control of cardiovascular function Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 1999; 43(3): 639 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sander, B. Chavoshan, and R. G. Victor A Large Blood Pressure–Raising Effect of Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition in Humans Hypertension, April 1, 1999; 33(4): 937 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kagiyama, S. Articles by Fujishima, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kagiyama, S. Articles by Fujishima, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB (L)-ARGININE NITRIC OXIDE