Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;31:978-985

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.

(Hypertension. 1998;31:978-985.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Oleic Acid and Angiotensin II Induce a Synergistic Mitogenic Response in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Gang Lu; Kathryn E. Meier; Ayad A. Jaffa; Steven A. Rosenzweig; ; Brent M. Egan

From the Departments of Pharmacology (G.L., K.E.M., A.A.J., S.A.R., B.M.E.) and Medicine (A.A.J., B.M.E.), Medical University of South Carolina (Charleston).

Correspondence to Brent M. Egan, MD, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Ave, CSB 826H, Charleston, SC 29464.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Oleic acid and angiotensin II (Ang II) are elevated and may interact to accelerate vascular disease in obese hypertensive patients. We studied the effects of oleic acid and Ang II on growth responses of rat aortic smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Oleic acid (50 µmol/L) raised thymidine incorporation by 50% at 24 hours and cell number by 55% at 6 days (P<.05). Ang II (10-11 to 10-6 mol/L) did not significantly increase thymidine incorporation or VSMC number. Combining Ang II and 50 µmol/L oleic acid doubled thymidine incorporation and VSMC number. Losartan, an angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, blocked the synergistic interaction between Ang II and oleic acid, whereas the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 did not. Protein kinase C inhibition and downregulation, as well as inhibition of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation by PD 98059, eliminated the rise of thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid and the synergistic interaction with Ang II. However, the response to 10% fetal bovine serum was unaffected. An antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to ERK-1 and ERK-2 reduced ERK protein expression and activation by 83% and 75%, respectively. Antisense prevented the rise of thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid and the synergy with Ang II. Antisense reduced but did not prevent increased thymidine incorporation in response to serum. The data indicate that oleic acid and Ang II exert a synergistic mitogenic effect in VSMCs and suggest an important role for the AT1 receptor, PKC, and ERK in this synergy. The observations raise the possibility that a synergistic mitogenic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II accelerates vascular remodeling in obese hypertensive patients.


Key Words: muscle, smooth, vascular • oleic acid • angiotensin II • receptors, angiotensin • protein kinase C • extracellular signal-regulated kinases • oligonucleotides, antisense


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The excess incidence of vascular disease in subjects with the cardiovascular risk factor cluster1 2 3 is only partially explained by elevations of blood pressure, lipids, and glucose. Insulin resistance may contribute independently to cardiovascular disease in patients with the risk factor cluster.1 However, the mechanisms by which insulin resistance, apart from the traditional risk factors noted, leads to cardiovascular disease remain poorly defined. One possible contributor may be the defect in the capacity of insulin to suppress plasma concentrations and turnover of nonesterified fatty acids in patients with risk factor clustering.4 5 6 We observed that oleic acid was the most abundant fatty acid in plasma and that obese hypertensive patients had higher fasting plasma oleic acid concentrations than lean normotensive subjects.7

Cis-Unsaturated fatty acids, eg, oleic acid (18:1[cis]), can activate PKC.8 9 Activation of PKC has been implicated as a key signaling event in cell growth and proliferation in response to several mitogens.10 11 We performed experiments that demonstrated that oleic acid induced a PKC-dependent mitogenic response in rat aortic VSMCs.12 Neither stearic (18:0) nor elaidic (18:1[trans]) acids, which are weak activators of PKC,8 induced a mitogenic response.

Subjects with risk factor clustering also have a more active renin-angiotensin system.13 14 Ang II enhances the response to several mitogens.15 This raises the possibility that the increased oleic acid concentrations and the enhanced activity of the renin-angiotensin axis may interact to accelerate vascular changes among high-risk subjects such as obese hypertensives. Consequently, we examined the separate and combined effects of oleic acid and Ang II on thymidine uptake and cell number in rat aortic VSMCs.

Because the signal transduction pathways by which growth factors interact could have important therapeutic implications, we attempted to define early signaling events in the mitogenic response to the oleic acid–Ang II combination. Both oleic acid and Ang II activate PKC8 9 12 15 16 and, in turn, ERKs. ERK activation is a common point in the signaling pathway for cell growth and/or differentiation in response to several different mitogens.17 18 19 We examined whether the mitogenic effects of the oleic acid–Ang II combination were dependent on activation of PKC and ERK. Furthermore, given that Ang II may promote growth via AT1 receptors and inhibit growth via AT2 receptors,20 the effects of selective blockers on the mitogenic response to oleic acid and Ang II were assessed.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Materials
Individual fatty acids were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co, and sodium salts were prepared as previously described.12 Losartan was obtained from Dupont-Merck Pharmaceutical Co. PD 123319 and PD 98059 were purchased from RBI. Cell culture media were obtained from GIBCO BRL. Fatty acid–free albumin was purchased from ICN Biomedicals Inc. [3H]Thymidine (6.7 Ci/mmol, 37.0 MBq) and {gamma}-P32-ATP (3000 Ci/mmol, 37 MBq) were purchased from Dupont-NEN.

Cell Culture
Rat aortic VSMCs were cultured by procedures modified from Chamley-Campbell et al21 as described.12

[3H]Thymidine Incorporation
Effects of Oleic Acid and Ang II on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
VSMCs were grown to subconfluence in 10% FBS in 24-well plates and incubated in DMEM with 0.1% FBS for 48 hours. Oleic acid and Ang II alone or together were added to triplicate wells in fresh DMEM supplemented with 0.1% FBS and 100 µmol/L fatty acid–free albumin for 24 hours. Because some fatty acids, including oleic acid, affect angiotensin receptor affinity,22 separate experiments were performed in which Ang II was added 5 minutes before or after oleic acid. Cells were pulse-labeled with [3H]thymidine (0.5 µCi per well) 6 hours before completion of the 24-hour incubation period. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured as described12 and expressed as a percentage of control.

Effect of AT1 and AT2 Receptor Antagonists on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
Before the addition of oleic acid and/or Ang II, quiescent VSMCs were preincubated for 1 hour with 10-5 mol/L losartan or 10-5 mol/L PD 123319. Thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid and Ang II was quantified as described above.

Effect of PKC Inhibition and Depletion on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
Before the addition of oleic acid and/or Ang II, quiescent VSMCs were preincubated for 1 hour with 4 µmol/L bisindolylmaleimide I to inhibit PKC or for 24 hours with 200 nmol/L PMA to deplete PKC as described.12

Effect of MEK Inhibition With PD 98059 on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
Before the addition of oleic acid and/or Ang II, quiescent VSMCs were preincubated for 1 hour with 20 µmol/L PD 98059. The incorporation of [3H]thymidine in response to oleic acid and Ang II was studied using the protocol described above.

Effect of Antisense ODN to ERKs on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation
The antisense ODN, 17-mer (5'-GCCGCCGCCGCCGCCAT-3') directed against a consensus sequence for initiating the translation of rat ERK-1 and ERK-2, sense ODN (5'-ATGGCGGCGGCGGCGGC-3'), and scrambled controls (5'-CGCGCGCTCGCGCACCC-3') were synthesized.23 24 25 Transfections of rat aortic VSMCs with different concentrations of ODNs including antisense, sense, and scrambled ODNs were performed in Opti-Media (GIBCO BRL) with 10 µg/mL lipofectin. Cells were incubated for 5 hours at 37°C in 5% CO2. The medium was replaced with lipofectin-free DMEM containing the desired ODN concentration, and incubation was continued for another 42 hours before cell harvesting. ERK protein content and activity were measured with immunoblots using anti-ACTIVE MAP kinase pAb (Promega Co) and anti-ERK mAb (Transduction Laboratories), respectively. The effect of antisense and control ODNs on [3H]thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid, Ang II alone and together, or 10% FBS was measured as described above.

Effects of Oleic Acid and Ang II on VSMC Number
In separate experiments, rat aortic VSMCs were seeded at 10 000 cells per well, grown to subconfluence, and growth-arrested by serum deprivation. These cells were incubated with oleic acid and/or Ang II, with or without 4 µmol/L bisindolylmaleimide I, for 6 days with a change of media after 72 hours. Elaidic and stearic acids were used to control for potential nonspecific effects of oleic acid on cell growth.12 Cells were resuspended with 0.3 mL trypsin/EDTA (0.05%/0.5 mmol/L), and cell number was determined using a hemocytometer.

ERK Activity Assay
Confluent VSMCs in 100-mm Petri dishes were incubated in 0.1% FBS DMEM for 48 hours. The monolayer was exposed to oleic acid, Ang II, or 10% FBS in serum-free DMEM for 10 minutes under 5% CO2 at 37°C. The incubation was stopped by adding ice-cold PBS. Cells were scraped into PBS and pelleted by centrifugation for 20 seconds at 2000g. The pellet was suspended in cold lysis buffer.12 The suspended pellet was sonicated for 5 seconds and centrifuged at 100 000g at 4°C. The supernatant was used as the enzyme preparation for assay of activated MAP kinase. ERK activity in cell lysates was assessed using 32P phosphorylation of myelin basic protein.17 ERK activity was corrected for protein and expressed as a percentage of the activity in untreated cells.

Immunoblots using anti-ACTIVE MAP kinase pAb26 27 28 and anti-ERK mAb were performed to corroborate findings from the ERK activity assay. Proteins in whole cell extracts from cells treated with/without PD98059 or antisense ODNs were resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.12

Effects of Oleic Acid on Activation of JNK and p38
Quiescent VSMCs were treated with 50 µmol/L oleic acid and/or Ang II and serum for 30 minutes or UV irradiation. For the UV experiments, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and irradiated (254 nmol/L, UV-C) for 40 seconds. Media were added immediately after the irradiation, and the cells were harvested after 30 minutes. Proteins in whole cell extracts were resolved by SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene membranes, and then immunoblotted with anti–phospho-specific p38, anti-p38, anti–phospho-specific SAPK/JNK (New England Biolab, Inc), and anti-SAPK/JNK antibodies29 (generated and provided by S.A.R.).

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as mean±SEM. Data were analyzed with SPSS 6.0 (SPSS Inc). One-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test was used to compare the cell number and ERK activity changes between treatment and control groups. Values of P<.05 were considered statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effects of Oleic Acid and Ang II Alone and Together on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation in VSMCs
Ang II from 10-10 mol/L to 10-8 mol/L increased thymidine incorporation from 111% to 121% of control (P=NS). Oleic acid (50 µmol/L) increased thymidine incorporation to 150% of control (P<.05). When 50 µmol/L oleic acid was added to the media 5 minutes before Ang II, the combination of oleic acid with 10-10 mol/L to 10-8 mol/L Ang II synergistically enhanced thymidine incorporation from 206% to 225% of control. The synergistic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II was abolished by PKC inhibition with 4 µmol/L bisindolylmaleimide I or by PKC depletion with PMA (Fig 1Down). When Ang II was added 5 minutes before oleic acid, the synergistic effect between oleic acid and Ang II on thymidine uptake was observed at 10-11 mol/L Ang II (Fig 1Down). When the sequence was reversed, 10-11 mol/L Ang II did not synergistically enhance the response to oleic acid. The order of addition did not affect thymidine incorporation at Ang II concentrations of 10-10 mol/L and greater.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Top, Effects of oleic acid (OA) and Ang II (AII) alone and together on [3H]thymidine incorporation. The effects of PKC inhibition and depletion on this mitogenic response are also depicted. Various concentrations of oleic acid and/or Ang II were added to quiescent rat aortic VSMCs or cells preincubated either with 4 µmol/L bisindolylmaleimide (Bisi) for 1 hour to inhibit PKC or 200 nmol/L PMA for 24 hours to deplete PKC, for 24 hours at 37°C. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured 6 hours after addition of [3H]thymidine. Data are presented as mean±SD for three independent experiments in triplicate. *P<.05 vs baseline; {wedge}P<.05 vs oleic acid alone, by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test. Bottom, Either oleic acid or Ang II was added to the media 5 minutes before the other and the incubation was continued for 24 hours. As shown, the order of addition significantly affected thymidine incorporation at an Ang II concentration of 10-11 mol/L but not at 10-10 or 10-9 mol/L. *P<.05 for order of addition (oleic acid vs Ang II first) at 10-11 mol/L Ang II.

Effect of Oleic Acid and Ang II Alone and Together on VSMC Number
After 48 hours of growth arrest with 0.1% FBS DMEM, there were 3.51±0.33x104 cells per well (n=6). Under basal conditions (ie, a 6-day incubation with 0.1% FBS DMEM and 100 µmol/L fatty acid–free albumin), there were 5.79±0.24x104 cells per well (n=6). Addition of 10-10 mol/L to 10-8 mol/L Ang II for 6 days did not increase cell number compared with the control condition (TableDown). Addition of 50 µmol/L oleic acid increased cell number to 155% of control, while the combination of oleic acid and Ang II from 10-10 mol/L to 10-8 mol/L increased cell number to 188% to 214% of control (P<.05) compared with oleic acid alone. In contrast to oleic acid, the same concentrations of stearic acid and elaidic acid did not increase VSMC number after 6 days (102% and 114% of control, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effects of Oleic Acid and Ang II Alone and Together for 6 Days Each on VSMC Number

Effect of AT1 and AT2 Receptor Antagonists on Thymidine Incorporation in Response to the Oleic Acid–Ang II Combination
Oleic acid (50 µmol/L) increased thymidine incorporation to 147% of control (Fig 2Down). The combination of 50 µmol/L oleic acid and 10-8 mol/L Ang II induced a more marked increase to 219% of control. When cells were pretreated with 10-5 mol/L losartan, an AT1 receptor antagonist, values for thymidine incorporation in response to the combination of oleic acid and Ang II were not different from those for oleic acid alone. In contrast, blocking AT2 receptors with 10-5 mol/L PD 123319 did not prevent the synergistic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II on thymidine incorporation. Neither 10-5 mol/L losartan nor 10-5 mol/L PD 123319 altered basal thymidine incorporation or the response to oleic acid (not shown).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of losartan and PD 123319 on thymidine uptake in response to oleic acid (OA) and Ang II (AII) in rat aortic VSMCs. Oleic acid (50 µmol/L) and 10-8 mol/L Ang II alone or together were added to quiescent VSMCs with/without preincubation of 10-5 mol/L losartan or 10-5 mol/L PD 123319 for 1 hour. The [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured 6 hours after addition to the media. Data are presented as mean±SEM for three independent experiments performed in triplicate. *P<.05 vs control; {wedge}P<.05 vs OA+Ang II.

Effect of ERK Kinase (MEK) Inhibition on ERK Activity and Thymidine Incorporation in Response to Oleic Acid and Ang II
When VSMCs were preincubated for 1 hour with 20 µmol/L PD 98059, a specific MEK inhibitor, basal ERK activity was unchanged. However, stimulation of ERK activity in response to oleic acid, Ang II, and serum was reduced by {approx}75% to 95% by PD 98059 (Fig 3ADown). The findings with the ERK activity assay using myelin basic protein as the substrate were confirmed in experiments using an antibody specific for active MAP kinase and ERKs (Fig 3ADown). Although active ERK-1 ({approx}44 kD) was visible only after a longer exposure time than for active ERK-2 ({approx}42 kD), the patterns of immunoreactivity for these two active ERK isoforms in response to oleic acid and Ang II were similar (not shown). Control experiments using anti-ERK confirmed that equal amounts of total ERK protein were present in each of the conditions. PD 98059 reduced basal thymidine incorporation by {approx}50% and abolished the rise of thymidine incorporation in response to 50 µmol/L oleic acid and 10-8 mol/L Ang II both singly and combined (Fig 3BDown). In contrast, 20 µmol/L PD 98059 did not significantly blunt thymidine incorporation in response to serum.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of MEK inhibition on ERK activation and thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid (OA) and Ang II (AII) alone and together. A, Oleic acid (50 µmol/L) and 10-8 mol/L Ang II alone or together and 10% FBS were added to rat aortic VSMCs with/without 1-hour preincubation in 20 µmol/L PD 98059 for 10 minutes. Cells were harvested and cytosolic extracts prepared as described for the ERK activity assay using the incorporation of 32P into myelin basic protein. Values shown are the mean±SD from three experiments. For comparison, whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with active MAP kinase and ERK antibodies. B, Oleic acid or Ang II were added to quiescent rat aortic VSMCs pretreated for 1 hour with PD 09859. The cells were then incubated for 24 hours at 37°C. [3H]Thymidine incorporation was measured 6 hours after addition of [3H]thymidine. Data are presented as mean±SD for three independent experiments in triplicate. *P<.05 vs control.

Effect of Antisense ODN on [3H]Thymidine Incorporation in Response to Oleic Acid
Antisense experiments were performed using a 17-mer ODN targeting a consensus sequence at the initiation site for ERK-1 and ERK-2 mRNA.23 24 25 Immunoblotting demonstrated that the antisense ODNs induced a concentration-dependent decrease in ERK protein 48 hours after liposomal transfection (Fig 4ADown). Lipofectin alone and together with sense and scrambled ODNs did not affect ERK protein. Antisense did not affect the expression of PKC {alpha}, JNK, and p38 (867±76, 344±32, and 1024±223 arbitrary units for antisense ODN–treated cells versus 913±121, 359±64, and 996±89 arbitrary units for cells treated with lipofectin, respectively). Immunoblots for phospho-MAP kinase (Fig 4BDown) also showed that treatment with antisense ODNs significantly inhibited activation of the p42 and p44 MAP kinase isoforms in response to 100 µmol/L oleic acid in a dose-dependent manner. Microscopic observation revealed a normal morphology and viability in antisense ODN–treated cells. Antisense ODNs reduced basal thymidine incorporation {approx}35% and prevented a significant rise of thymidine incorporation in response to 50 µmol/L oleic acid and Ang II 10-8 mol/L alone and together (Fig 5Down). Antisense ODNs reduced but did not eliminate the significant increase of thymidine incorporation in response to serum. Sense ODNs did not affect thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid or serum.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of antisense ODNs on MAP kinase (ERK) protein content and MAP kinase (ERK) activity. Forty-eight hours after liposomal transfection of ODNs, cells were treated with DMEM or 100 µmol/L oleic acid for 10 minutes, harvested, subjected to SDS– polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and immunoblotted for ERKs. A, top, Representative immunoblot for total ERK-1 and ERK-2; bottom, densitometric quantification of immunoblots for total ERK-1 and ERK-2. *P<.05 vs control (C; lipofectin alone), sense, and scrambled ODNs. B, top, Representative immunoblot of phospho-MAP kinase; bottom, densitometric quantification of immunoblots for phospho-MAP kinase. *P<.05 vs control (lipofectin alone), sense, and scrambled ODNs.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Impact of an antisense ODN to ERK-1 and ERK-2 on [3H]thymidine incorporation in response to serum and to oleic acid (OA) and Ang II (AII) either alone or together. Rat aortic VSMCs were transfected with antisense, sense, and scrambled ODNs and then treated with oleic acid, Ang II, and 10% FBS for 24 hours. Thymidine incorporation was measured 6 hours after addition of [3H]thymidine. Data are presented as mean±SD for three independent experiments in triplicate. *P<.05 vs lipofectin plus antisense ODN.

Effect of Oleic Acid on Activation of p38 and JNK
As shown in Fig 6Down, serum induced activating phosphorylations of both p38 and JNK within 30 minutes. UV irradiation activated JNK only, whereas oleic acid and Ang II alone or together failed to activate either of these kinases.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of oleic acid (OA), Ang II (AII), and serum on activation of p38 and JNK. Quiescent rat aortic VSMCs were exposed to oleic acid, Ang II alone and together, and 10% FBS for 30 minutes or UV irradiation (40 seconds) followed by 30 minutes of incubation. Cells were washed, harvested, and subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotted for p38, phospho-p38, JNK, and phospho-JNK. Representative immunoblots are shown.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The principal finding of this study is that oleic acid and Ang II induce a synergistic mitogenic effect in rat aortic VSMCs (Fig 1Up, Table 1Up). While Ang II alone did not significantly increase either thymidine incorporation or cell number, it approximately doubled the increase of thymidine incorporation and cell number in response to oleic acid. Subjects with the cardiovascular risk factor cluster have an increase of plasma nonesterified fatty acids4 5 6 and a more active renin-angiotensin system.13 14 The data raise the possibility that oleic acid and Ang II combine to accelerate vascular remodeling among high-risk subjects such as obese hypertensive patients.

The potential relevance of the synergistic mitogenic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II and vascular disease among insulin-resistant subjects with the risk factor cluster is heightened by two points. First, the synergistic interaction occurs at physiological concentrations of these two growth factors.7 30 Although the 50-µmol/L concentration of oleic acid is significantly lower than mean plasma values measured in obese hypertensive patients (172±11 µmol/L),7 nonesterified fatty acids in the extracellular fluid are predominantly bound to albumin. Albumin concentrations in the interstitial fluid are approximately one quarter of those in plasma. Thus, we estimate that interstitial fluid concentrations of oleic acid surrounding VSMCs in obese hypertensive patients would be {approx}40 to 50 µmol/L.

Second, when Ang II was added to the media before oleic acid, Ang II concentrations at the very low end of the physiological range (10-11 mol/L)31 augmented thymidine incorporation in combination with oleic acid. If very low concentrations of Ang II elicit most of the synergistic mitogenic effect, then the higher Ang II in subjects with risk factor clustering13 14 would have less impact. However, some fatty acids, including oleic acid, decrease affinity of Ang II for its receptor.22 When oleic acid was added to the media before Ang II, a synergistic mitogenic effect was seen at 10-10 mol/L Ang II and greater but not at 10-11 mol/L (Fig 1Up). The greater activity of the renin-angiotensin system in patients with risk factor clustering13 14 may be essential in eliciting a synergistic mitogenic effect on VSMCs in the presence of physiological concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids.

Signaling Events in the Mitogenic Interaction Between Oleic Acid and Ang II
Ang II, acting via its G protein–coupled AT1 receptor, activates phospholipase C, which hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol to diacylglycerol and inositol trisphosphate. The diacylglycerol and elevated intracellular Ca2+ activate PKC. Oleic acid increases predominantly cytosolic Ca2+-independent PKC activity.8 9 12 PKC can activate ERK by effects at multiple points that converge at MEK. Therefore, we focused on the AT1 receptor, PKC, MEK, and ERK in an attempt to explain the mitogenic interactions between Ang II and oleic acid.

Losartan, an AT1-receptor antagonist,32 blocked the capacity of Ang II to synergistically enhance thymidine uptake in response to oleic acid, whereas PD 123319, an AT2-receptor antagonist, did not (Fig 2Up). These data suggest that the capacity of Ang II to augment the mitogenic response to oleic acid is mediated via the AT1 receptor, as noted previously.20 33 The findings do not implicate a growth-inhibitory role for AT2 receptors in these rat aortic VSMCs.20

PKC inhibition and depletion eliminated the synergistic mitogenic effect of the oleic acid–Ang II combination (Fig 1Up). The effects of PKC inhibition and depletion on thymidine incorporation did not reflect nonspecific toxicity, since basal thymidine incorporation and the increase in response to 10% FBS were unaffected.12 These data confirm that the mitogenic response to oleic acid is PKC dependent12 and indicate that PKC is also required for the synergistic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II.

We previously reported that rat aortic VSMCs contain the {alpha}, µ, {iota}, and {zeta} PKC isoforms.12 Although {iota} and {zeta} do not have a phorbol ester binding site, these two isoforms were downregulated by PMA after 24 hours. Activation of PKC, which had been partially purified from rat VSMCs, in response to oleic acid was almost entirely Ca2+ independent.12 This is consistent with previous reports indicating that oleic acid more potently and completely activates the Ca2+-independent and atypical PKC isoforms.8 9 PKC {zeta} has been shown to activate ERK and has been associated with mitogenesis in various cell lines.34 In contrast, PKC {alpha}, a Ca2+-dependent isoform, is less potently stimulated by oleic acid9 and has been associated with differentiation rather than proliferation in VSMCs.35 The novel and/or atypical PKC isoforms may explain the mitogenic response to oleic acid and the synergistic interaction with Ang II.

MEK inhibition with PD 98059 essentially blocked ERK activation in response to oleic acid and Ang II singly and combined (Fig 3Up). PD 98059 and the antisense ODN prevented the significant rise of thymidine incorporation in response to oleic acid alone and the synergistic interaction with Ang II. However, PD 98059 did not significantly reduce thymidine incorporation in response to serum, which indicates that the cells were still capable of synthesizing DNA. The data also suggest that activation of MEK and ERK are important in the mitogenic response to oleic acid and the synergistic interaction with Ang II. Nevertheless, the findings could still reflect a nonspecific or toxic effect of PD 98059 on cell signaling that affected the response to oleic acid and Ang II more than to serum.

To address this concern, experiments were conducted using antisense ODNs to ERK-1 and ERK-2. The antisense ODNs reduced ERK protein expression by 83% and ERK activation in response to oleic acid by 75% (Fig 4Up). Antisense also blocked the significant increase of thymidine incorporation to oleic acid alone and the synergistic interaction with Ang II. In contrast to PD 98059, antisense more effectively limited serum-induced thymidine incorporation. Collectively, these observations indicate that MEK and ERK activation are essential, although not necessarily sufficient, in mediating the mitogenic response to oleic acid and the synergistic interaction with Ang II. Moreover, serum but not oleic acid or Ang II induced activation of p38 and JNK (Fig 6Up).36 37 38 39 These data suggest that serum can induce significant cell growth despite marked limitation of MEK and ERK activation. This response may be mediated in part via other members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family, eg, p38 and JNK.36 37 38 39 Oleic acid can potently stimulate nuclear phospholipase D. However, the nuclear ADP-ribosylation factor-dependent phospholipase D activity is associated with cell proliferation,40 41 while oleate-dependent phospholipase D activitity is not.

Limitations
While the synergistic mitogenic effect of oleic acid and Ang II is PKC-, MEK-, and ERK-dependent, the data do not establish that activation of ERK alone is sufficient to explain this synergy. Our studies have not defined the important nuclear signaling events. In other studies, the effects of Ang II on VSMC proliferation were heterogeneous31 42 43 and coincided inversely with changes in transforming growth factor-ß1.42 43 44 Quantifying the effects of oleic acid on transforming growth factor-ß1 responses to Ang II in future studies might prove instructive.

Summary
Subjects with the risk factor cluster have elevated fatty acids and a more active renin-angiotensin system. Angiotensin, acting on the AT1 receptor, synergistically augments the mitogenic response to oleic acid. Activations of PKC, MEK, and ERKs are necessary steps in the synergistic mitogenic response to oleic acid and Ang II. A synergistic mitogenic interaction between oleic acid and Ang II may accelerate vascular disease among subjects with the cardiovascular risk factor cluster.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
Ang II = angiotensin II
AT1 = angiotensin type 1 receptor
DMEM = Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
ERK = extracellular signal-regulated kinase
FBS = fetal bovine serum
JNK = jun N-terminal kinase
MAP kinase = mitogen-activated protein kinase
MEK = mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase
p38 = p38 MAP kinase
PKC = protein kinase C
PMA = phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
VSMC = vascular smooth muscle cell
ODN = oligodeoxynucleotide


*    Acknowledgments
 
This research was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (HL43164, HL58794, and DK46543), American Heart Association (South Carolina Affiliate), American Diabetes Association, National Science Foundation (South Carolina EPSCOR), and the University Research Committee at Medical University of South Carolina. Dr Lu is supported by NIH postdoctoral training grant HL07260.

Received September 25, 1997; first decision October 8, 1997; accepted November 25, 1997.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Stern M, Haffner S. Body fat distribution and hyperinsulinemia as risk factors for diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Arteriosclerosis. 1986;6:123–129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Gillum R. The association of body fat distribution with hypertension, hypertensive heart disease, CHD, diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in men and women ages 18–79 years. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:421–428.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Peiris A, Sothmann M, Hoffmann R, Hennes M, Wilson C, Gustafson A, Kissebah A. Adiposity, fat distribution and cardiovascular risk. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:867–872.

4. Reaven GM, Hollenbeck C, Jeng CY, Wu MS, Chen YD. Measurement of plasma glucose, free fatty acid, lactate and insulin for 24 h in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1988;37:1020–1024.[Abstract]

5. Jensen MD, Haymond MW, Rizza RA, Cryer PE, Miles JM. Influence of body fat distribution on free fatty acid metabolism in obesity. J Clin Invest. 1989;83:1168–1173.

6. Egan BM, Hennes MMI, O'Shaughnessy IM, Stepniakowski KT, Kissebah AH, Goodfriend TL. Obesity hypertension is more closely related to impairment of insulin's fatty acid than glucose lowering action. Hypertension. 1996;27(pt 2):723–728.

7. Davda RK, Stepniakowski KT, Lu G, Ullian ME, Goodfriend TL, Egan BM. Oleic acid inhibits endothelial nitric oxide synthase by a protein kinase C–independent mechanism. Hypertension. 1995;26:764–770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Murakami K, Chan SY, Routtenberg A. Protein kinase C activation by cis-fatty acid in the absence of Ca2+ and phospholipids. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:15424–15429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Khan WA, Blobe G, Halpern A, Taylor W, Wetsel WC, Burns D, Loomis C, Hannun YA. Selective regulation of protein kinase C isoenzymes by oleic acid in human platelets. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:5063–5068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Dzau VJ, Gibbons GH. Endothelium and growth factors in vascular remodeling of hypertension. Hypertension 1991;18(suppl III):III-115–III-121.

11. Yong VW. Proliferation of human and mouse astrocytes in vitro: signalling through the protein kinase C pathway. J Neurol Sci. 1992;111:92–103.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Lu G, Morinelli TA, Meier KE, Rosenzweig SA, Egan BM. Oleic acid–induced mitogenic signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells: a role for protein kinase C. Circ Res. 1996;79:611–618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Egan BM, Stepniakowski K, Goodfriend TL. Renin and aldosterone are higher and the hyperinsulinemic effect of salt restriction are greater in subjects with risk factor clustering. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:886–893.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Goodfriend TL, Egan BM, Stepniakowski K, Ball D. Relationships among plasma aldosterone, HDL cholesterol, and insulin in humans. Hypertension. 1995;25:30–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Schelling P, Fischer H, Ganten D. Angiotensin and cell growth: a link to cardiovascular hypertrophy? J Hypertens. 1991;9:3–15.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Garrison JC, Johnson DE, Campanile CP. Evidence for the role of phosphorylase kinase, protein kinase C and other Ca2+-sensitive protein kinases in the response of hepatocytes to angiotensin II and vasopressin. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:3283–3292.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Jones LG, Ella KM, Bradshaw CD, Gause KC, Dey M, Wisehart-Johnson AE, Spivey EC, Meier KE. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and phospholipase D in A7r5 vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23790–23799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Cobb MH, Boulton TG, Robbins DJ. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases. Cell Regulation. 1991;2:965–978.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Davis RJ. The mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:14553–14556.[Free Full Text]

20. Stoll M, Steckelings MU, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R, Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:651–657.

21. Chamley-Campbell JH, Campbell GR, Ross R. The smooth muscle cell in culture. Physiol Rev. 1979;59:1–61.[Free Full Text]

22. Goodfriend TL, Ball DL. Fatty acid effect on angiotensin receptors. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1986;8:1276–1283.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Sale EM, Atkinson PGP, Sale GJ. The requirement of MAP kinase for the differentiation of fibroblasts to adipocytes, for insulin activation of p90 S6 kinase and for insulin or serum stimulation of DNA synthesis. EMBO J. 1995;14:674–684.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Glennon PE, Kaddoura S, Sale EM, Sale GJ, Fuller SJ, Sugden PH. Depletion of mitogen-activated protein kinase using an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide approach downregulates the phenylephrine-induced hypertrophic response in rat cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 1996;78:954–961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Graf K, Xi XP, Yang D, Fleck E, Hsueh WA, Law RE. Mitogen-activated protein kinase activation is involved in platelet-derived growth factor-directed migration by vascular smooth muscle cells. Hypertension. 1997;29(pt 2):334–339.

26. Taylor SS, Radzio-Andzelm E, Hunter T. How do protein kinases discriminate between serine/threonine and tyrosine? Structural insights from the insulin receptor protein-tyrosine kinase. FASEB J.. 1995;9:1255–1266.[Abstract]

27. Payne DM, Rossomando PM, Erickson AK, Her JH, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Weber MJ, Sturgill TW. Identification of the regulatory phosphorylation sites in PP42/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAP kinase). EMBO J. 1991;10:885–892.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Garnovskaya MN, Biesen TV, Hawes B, Ramos SC, Lefkowitz RJ, Raymond JR. Ras-dependent activation of fibroblast mitogen-activated protein kinase by 5-HT1A receptor via a G protein ß{gamma}-subunit-initiated pathway. Biochemistry. 1996;35:13716–13722.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Miller BS, Shankavaram UT, Horney MJ, Gore ACS, Kurtz DT, Rosenzweig SA. Activation of c-Jun: NH2-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase by insulin. Biochemistry. 1996;35:8769–8775.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Oliver WJ, Cohen EL, Neel JV. Blood pressure, sodium intake, and sodium related hormones in the Yanomano Indians, a "no-salt" culture. Circulation. 1975;52:146–151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Chinn RH, Düsterdieck G. The response of blood pressure to infusion of angiotensin II: relation to plasma concentrations of renin and angiotensin II. Clin Sci.. 1972;72:489–504.

32. Chiu AT, McCall DE, Aldrich PE, Timmermans PB. [3H] DUP 753, a highly potent and specific radioligand for the angiotensin II-1 receptor subtype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;172:1195–1202.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Timmermans PBMWM, Wong PC, Chiu AT, Herblin WF, Benfield P, Carinin DJ, Lee RJ, Wexler RR, Saye JAM, Smith RD. Angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists. Pharmacol Rev. 1993;45:205–251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Berra E, Diaz-Meco MT, Dominguez I, Municio MM, Sanz L, Lozano J, Chapkin RS, Moscat J. Protein kinase C {zeta} isoform is critical for mitogenic signal transduction. Cell. 1993;74:555–563.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Haller H, Lindschau C, Quass P, Distler A, Luft FC. Differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the regulation of protein kinase C-{alpha}. Circ Res. 1995;76:21–29.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Tan Y, Rouse J, Zhang A, Cariati S, Cohen P, Comb MJ. FGF and stress regulate CREB and ATF-1 via a pathway involving p38 MAP kinase and MAPKAP kinase-2. EMBO J. 1996;15:4629–4642.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Derijard B, Raingeaud J, Barrett T, Wu IH, Han J, Ulevitch RJ, Davis RJ. Independent human MAP-kinase signal transduction pathways defined by MEK and MKK isoforms. Science. 1995;267:682–685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Sanchez I, Hughes RT, Mayer BJ, Yee K, Woodgett JR, Avruch J, Kyriakis JM, Zon LI. Role of SAPK/ERK kinase-1 in the stress-activated pathway regulating transcription factor c-Jun. Nature. 1994;372:794–798.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

39. Meier R, Rouse J, Cuenda A, Nebreda AR, Cohen P. Cellular stresses and cytokines activate multiple mitogen-activated-protein kinase kinase homologues in PC12 and KB cells. Eur J Biochem. 1996;236:796–805.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Banno Y, Tamiya-Koizumi K, Oshima H, Morikawa A, Yoshida S, Nozawa Y. Nuclear ADP-ribosylation factor (AFR)-, and oleate-dependent phospholipase D (PLD) in rat liver cells: increasing of AFR-dependent PLD activity in regenerating liver cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5208–5213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Cohen MV, Liu Y, Liu GS, Wang P, Weinbrenner C, Cordis GA, Das DK, Downey JM. Phospholipase D plays a role in ischemic preconditioning in rabbit heart. Circulation. 1996;94:1713–1718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Owens GK, Geisterfer AAT, Yang YWH, Komoriya A. Transforming growth factor-ß induced growth inhibition and cellular hypertrophy in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:771–780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Gibbons GH, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ. Vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy vs hyperplasia: autocrine transforming growth factor-ß1 expression determines growth response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:456–461.

44. Koibuchi Y, Lee WS, Gibbons GH, Pratt RE. Role of transforming growth factor-ß1 in the cellular growth response to angiotensin II. Hypertension. 1993;21:1046–1050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. E. Umpierrez, D. Smiley, G. Robalino, L. Peng, A. E. Kitabchi, B. Khan, A. Le, A. Quyyumi, V. Brown, and L. S. Phillips
Intravenous Intralipid-Induced Blood Pressure Elevation and Endothelial Dysfunction in Obese African-Americans with Type 2 Diabetes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2009; 94(2): 609 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
R. H Boger, E. Schwedhelm, R. Maas, S. Quispe-Bravo, and C. Skamira
ADMA and oxidative stress may relate to the progression of renal disease: rationale and design of the VIVALDI study
Vascular Medicine, July 1, 2005; 10(1_suppl): S97 - S102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
R. H Boger, E. Schwedhelm, R. Maas, S. Quispe-Bravo, and C. Skamira
ADMA and oxidative stress may relate to the progression of renal disease: rationale and design of the VIVALDI study
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2005; 10(2_suppl): S97 - S102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Askari, M. A. Carroll, M. Capparelli, F. Kramer, R. G. Gerrity, and K. E. Bornfeldt
Oleate and Linoleate Enhance the Growth-promoting Effects of Insulin-like Growth Factor-I through a Phospholipase D-dependent Pathway in Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 20, 2002; 277(39): 36338 - 36344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. Haastrup, C. A. Gadegbeku, D. Zhang, Y. V. Mukhin, E. L. Greene, A. A. Jaffa, and B. M. Egan
Lipids Stimulate the Production of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1{alpha} in Human Dorsal Hand Veins
Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 858 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Stojiljkovic, D. Zhang, H. F. Lopes, C. G. Lee, T. L. Goodfriend, and B. M. Egan
Hemodynamic effects of lipids in humans
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): R1674 - R1679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
E. L. Greene, G. Lu, D. Zhang, and B. M. Egan
Signaling Events Mediating the Additive Effects of Oleic Acid and Angiotensin II on Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Migration
Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 308 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
X.-P. Xi, K. Graf, S. Goetze, E. Fleck, W. A. Hsueh, and R. E. Law
Central Role of the MAPK Pathway in Ang II–Mediated DNA Synthesis and Migration in Rat Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 1999; 19(1): 73 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
G. Lu, E. L. Greene, T. Nagai, and B. M. Egan
Reactive Oxygen Species Are Critical in the Oleic Acid–Mediated Mitogenic Signaling Pathway in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Hypertension, December 1, 1998; 32(6): 1003 - 1010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Egan, B. M.