Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;31:1305-1310

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by d'Uscio, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lüscher, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by d'Uscio, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lüscher, T. F.

(Hypertension. 1998;31:1305-1310.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Losartan but Not Verapamil Inhibits Angiotensin II–Induced Tissue Endothelin-1 Increase

Role of Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function

Livius V. d'Uscio; Sidney Shaw; Matthias Barton; ; Thomas F. Lüscher

From Cardiovascular Research, Institute of Physiology, University of Zürich, and the Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zürich, and the Division of Cardiology and Department of Clinical Research, University Hospital, Bern (S.S.), Switzerland.

Correspondence to Thomas F. Lüscher, MD, FACC, FESC, Professor and Head of Cardiology, University Hospital, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail 100771.1237{at}compuserve.com


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Endothelin partially mediates angiotensin (Ang) II–induced vascular changes in vivo. This study investigated the effects of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil on vascular reactivity and tissue endothelin-1 levels in aortas of Wistar-Kyoto rats treated for 2 weeks with Ang II (200 ng · kg-1 · min-1). Ang II increased systolic blood pressure (39±4 mm Hg, P<0.05). Concomitant treatment with losartan abolished the Ang II–induced pressure increase (P<0.05), whereas verapamil reduced it only partially (P<0.05). In the aortas of rats with Ang II–induced hypertension, tissue endothelin-1 content was increased threefold and contractions to endothelin-1 were impaired (P<0.05). Interestingly, these alterations were normalized by losartan (P<0.05) but not by verapamil. Hence, there was a strong, negative correlation between contractions to endothelin-1 and tissue endothelin-1 content (r=-0.733, P<0.0001). In contrast, both antihypertensive drugs normalized impaired endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and reduced the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle to sodium nitroprusside compared with Ang II–treated rats (P<0.05). Ang II–induced hypertension enhanced endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine, and these were normalized by either drug. In conclusion, these findings suggest that long-term treatment with Ang II modulates endothelin-1 protein expression in the rat aorta. Although both antihypertensive agents lowered blood pressure and normalized endothelial function, only losartan prevented the increase in tissue endothelin-1 content, suggesting that angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists but not calcium antagonists modulate tissue endothelin-1 in vivo.


Key Words: angiotensin II • endothelin • endothelium • losartan • verapamil • aorta


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Angiotensin II is an important mediator contributing to cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, and renal failure.1 2 3 Ang II has multiple effects as a local modulator of vascular tone in an autocrine and paracrine manner via specific angiotensin receptors.2 Ang II–induced proliferation of rat VSMCs is mediated via the AT1 receptor.4 Ang II also stimulates the release of relaxant factors such as NO5 6 7 and constricting factors such as prostanoids8 and ET-1 in endothelial cells.9 10 11

ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide1 9 and acts as a mitogen and trophic factor in cultured VSMCs.12 13 The Ang II–induced expression of pre-pro-ET mRNA and subsequent ET-1 synthesis occur not only in cultured vascular endothelial cells9 10 11 14 but also in nonendothelial cells such as rat VSMCs through its interaction with the AT1 but not the AT2 receptor.15 16 Long-term treatment with Ang II increases tissue ET-1 content and induces vascular hypertrophy of small arteries, effects that are totally prevented by ETA receptor blockade,17 suggesting that this interaction between the vascular renin-angiotensin system and ET-1 is also operative in vivo. Furthermore, in mesenteric arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats, Ang II induces vascular production of ET-1 and thereby augments the contractile responses to NE in an endothelium-dependent manner.18 Although calcium channel blockers lower arterial pressure and improve endothelium-dependent relaxations in experimental models of hypertension,19 20 the long-term effects of calcium channel blockade in Ang II–induced hypertension and vascular ET production in this model are not known.

The present study was designed to investigate the effects of long-term treatment with the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil in Ang II–induced hypertension, with special emphasis on the ET pathway and its effects on endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular reactivity of isolated rat aortas.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Animals
Male normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats 9 weeks old were obtained from IFFA Credo (L'Arbresle, France) and maintained on standard rat chow with free access to drinking water at the animal facilities of the University Hospital Bern. All experimental protocols for animal research were approved by the local authorities of Bern, Switzerland. At the age of 10 weeks, rats were randomly assigned to 1 of the following 4 groups: (1) a control group (fed standard chow and water), (2) an Ang II group, (3) an Ang II plus losartan group, and (4) an Ang II plus verapamil group. Ang II was administered by subcutaneously implanted osmotic pumps (model 2002, Alzet Corp) delivering 200 ng · kg-1 · min-1 for 14 days. The dosages of losartan and verapamil were based on previous studies,19 21 and the drugs were administered with the powdered chow at an average dose of 14±1 and 63±1 mg · kg-1 · d-1, respectively. Body weights of the rats were monitored before and at the end of treatment. SBP and heart rate were measured in conscious rats by a tail-cuff method with the use of a pulse transducer (model LE 5000, Letica) before treatment and at the time when the rats were used for the following experiments at the age of 12 weeks. Then the rats were anesthetized (thiopental, 50 mg/kg body weight IP) and decapitated. The aortas were isolated and placed immediately into cold (4°C) modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution (in mmol/L): NaCl 118.6, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 2.5, MgSO4 1.2, KH2PO4 1.2, NaHCO3 25.1, EDTA 0.026, and glucose 10.1.

Experimental Setup
In Krebs solution each thoracic aorta was dissected free from connective tissue while being viewed under a microscope (Leica Wild M3C) and cut into rings 4 mm long. Rings were mounted horizontally between fixed and movable stainless stirrups, connected to a force transducer for recording isometric tension (Statham Universal UTC2), and then placed in an organ bath filled with 25 mL Krebs solution. The solutions were maintained at 37°C and aerated continuously with 95% O2/5% CO2 gas. After an equilibration period of 30 minutes, the rings were progressively stretched to their optimal passive tension (2.5±0.2 g) as assessed by the response to 100 mmol/L KCl in modified Krebs solution, which was prepared by equimolar replacement of NaCl with KCl in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution. Contractions to KCl did not differ between the rats in the control group (3.75±0.06 mN/mm) and those treated with Ang II (3.81±0.09 mN/mm), Ang II plus losartan (3.94±0.08 mN/mm), or Ang II plus verapamil (3.81±0.07 mN/mm). The stretched ring segments were equilibrated for 30 minutes before the experiment.

Protocols
For investigation of endothelium-dependent relaxations, aortic rings from the four experimental groups were incubated with or without SQ30741 (a prostaglandin H2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist) at 10-7 mol/L for 30 minutes22 or SOD (a superoxide anion scavenger) at 150 U/mL for 5 minutes.23 Rings were precontracted with NE (1 to 3x10-7 mol/L) and then relaxed with ACH (10-9 to 10-4 mol/L). For endothelium-independent relaxation, rings were precontracted with NE (1 to 3x10-7 mol/L) and relaxed with 10-10 to 10-5 mol/L SNP. Precontractions to NE were comparable in all treatment groups.

Endothelium-dependent contractions were tested in quiescent rings incubated with the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME at 10-4 mol/L for 30 minutes24 alone or with SQ30741 (10-7 mol/L). Cumulative concentrations of ACH (10-9 to 10-4 mol/L) were then added to the organ baths. Contractions to ET-1 (10-11 to 10-7 mol/L) were studied in aortic rings pretreated with or without SQ30741 at 10-7 mol/L. Contractile responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle to NE (10-10 to 10-5 mol/L) and U46619 (10-10 to 10-6 mol/L) was also obtained.

Measurement of Tissue ET-1 Levels
Dissected aortic rings were frozen in LN2 and kept at -80.25°C until assayed. In addition, rat aortas from control and Ang II groups were denuded of endothelium by scraping with a scalpel blade. Measurements were performed in a blinded fashion (n=6 per group). Frozen vessels were crushed, weighed, and homogenized as described elsewhere.17 25 Eluates were dried in a vacuum centrifugal evaporator and reconstituted in working assay buffer for radioimmunoassay. The overall recovery of ET-1 added to chloroform/methanol vessel homogenates and taken through all extraction steps was 65±3%, with interassay and intraassay coefficients of 5.6% and 10%, respectively (n=6).

Drugs
The following drugs were used for the protocols: ACH HCl, L-NE bitartrate, U46619 (9,11-dideoxy-11{alpha},9{alpha}-epoxymethanoprostaglandin F2{alpha}), SNP dihydrate, Cu/Zn SOD (from bovine erythrocytes; 4400 U/mg protein), L-NAME, Ang II (all from Sigma Chemical Co), and SQ30741 (Squibb Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, NJ). ET-1 was purchased from Novabiochem/Calbiochem AG. Losartan and verapamil were provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme–Chibret AG and Knoll AG, respectively. All drugs were dissolved in distilled water except ET-1 and SQ30741, which were prepared in 0.1% BSA solution and in 10% ethanol, respectively. Then all drugs were diluted in Krebs solution and expressed as final molar concentrations in the organ bath.

Statistical Analysis
The contractions were expressed as a percentage of 100 mmol/L KCl–induced contractions, which were obtained at the beginning of each experiment. Results are presented as mean±SEM. In all experiments, n equals the number of rats per experiment. For statistical analysis, the sensitivity of the vessels to the drugs was expressed as the negative logarithm of the concentration that caused half-maximal relaxation or contraction. Maximal relaxation (expressed as a percentage of precontraction) or contraction was determined for each individual concentration-response curve by nonlinear regression analysis with the use of MatLab software. For simple comparison between two values, paired Student's t test was used. For multiple comparisons, results were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's correction.26 Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated by linear regression. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Characteristics of Animals
The Ang II–induced increase in SBP was abolished by concomitant oral treatment with losartan but was prevented only partially by verapamil (P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Figure 1ADown and Table 1Down). Heart rate was lowered only in rats that received verapamil (P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Table 1Down). Body weights are also shown in Table 1Down.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Net increase in SBP (A) and tissue ET-1 levels (B) in rat aortas after 2 weeks of treatment with different regimens. Results are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs control; {dagger}P<0.05 vs Ang II group (ANOVA+Bonferroni's correction).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the Rats Measured After 2 Weeks of Treatment With Different Regimens

Tissue ET-1 Levels
The ET-1 tissue content in the aortas with an intact endothelium was increased threefold by Ang II treatment (P<0.05 versus control; Figure 1BUp). In aortas without an endothelium, basal ET-1 levels were 65±7% of those with endothelium in the control group and 64±5% of those in the Ang II group (P=NS). Losartan but not verapamil completely prevented the Ang II–induced increase in peptide content (P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Figure 1BUp).

Vascular Contractions
Reduced vascular reactivity to ET-1 was almost normalized by long-term administration of losartan only (P<0.05 versus Ang II group for the maximal response). Maximal contractions to ET-1 and local tissue ET-1 concentrations were inversely correlated (r=-0.733, P<0.0001, n=24; Figure 2BDown). Contractions to ET-1 were unaffected by SQ30741 in all groups (data not shown; n=6 or 7 per group). In contrast to contractions to ET-1, long-term treatment with either losartan or verapamil normalized the impaired contractions to NE observed in the Ang II–treated rats (P<0.05 for the maximal response; Table 2Down).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. A, Contractions to ET-1 in rat aortic rings after 2 weeks of treatment with different regimens. Contractions are expressed as percentage of 100 mmol/L KCl, and results are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs control; {dagger}P<0.05 vs Ang II group (ANOVA and Bonferroni). B, Linear inverse relationship between maximal contractions to ET-1 and tissue concentrations of ET-1 in rat aortas.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Maximal and Half-Maximal Contraction and Sensivity Values of Different Vasoactive Agents in Aortas of Wistar-Kyoto Rats After 2 Weeks of Treatment With Different Regimens

Long-term treatment with Ang II increased endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH (P<0.05; Table 2Up) in quiescent aortic rings with an intact endothelium in the presence of L-NAME. Concomitant treatment with either losartan or verapamil normalized endothelium-dependent contractions (P<0.05; Table 2Up). SBP was highly correlated with endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH (r=0.804, P<0.0001, n=25). Contractions to ACH were abolished in all groups after preincubation with SQ30741 and L-NAME (P<0.05, n=6; data not shown). The contractions to the thromboxane analogue U46619 did not differ in any of the treatment groups (Table 2Up).

Vascular Relaxations
In Ang II–induced hypertensive animals, endothelium-dependent relaxations to ACH in the aorta were markedly impaired compared with control (Figure 3ADown; P<0.05). Both losartan and verapamil improved endothelium-dependent relaxations to a similar degree (Figure 3ADown; P<0.05), which were unaffected by SQ30741 or SOD (data not shown). The sensitivity of the concentration-response curves to ACH did not differ among the groups.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Endothelium-dependent relaxations to ACH (A) and endothelium-independent relaxations to the NO donor SNP (B) in rat aortic rings after 2 weeks of treatment with different regimens. Results are mean±SEM and expressed as percent relaxation from contraction to NE. *P<0.05 vs control; {dagger}P<0.05 vs Ang II group (ANOVA and Bonferroni).

Maximal endothelium-independent relaxations to the NO donor SNP were comparable in all groups, but the sensitivity was shifted to the right in the Ang II group (P<0.05 versus control group). Both losartan and verapamil normalized endothelium-independent relaxations (P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Figure 3BUp).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that alterations of the vascular ET pathway in Ang II–induced hypertension are completely normalized by the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan. In contrast, the calcium channel blocker verapamil did not affect Ang II–induced increases in tissue ET-1 content or contractions to this peptide in the aorta, despite verapamil's beneficial effects on SBP, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired reactivity to other vasoconstrictors.

The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role as a modulator of vascular structure and function in arterial hypertension.2 However, it is still unclear whether and to what extent endothelial dysfunction contributes to vascular changes and whether these changes in the vascular ET system are due to changes in endothelial function or blood pressure. In this study, the calcium channel blocker verapamil only partially prevented the increase in SBP induced by long-term administration of Ang II at a dose that was comparable to those that have been shown to prevent elevation of arterial pressure in different animal models of hypertension.19 27 28 In line with previous observations, losartan abolished the Ang II–induced increase in SBP.21 Whereas losartan prevented the Ang II–induced increases in local aortic ET-1 concentrations, verapamil had no effect on tissue levels of this peptide. Ang II has been previously reported to stimulate expression of pre-pro-ET mRNA9 11 14 and to increase the release of the mature peptide in cultured endothelial cells,10 VSMCs,15 16 and mesangial cells29 in vitro. In this study, however, vascular ET-1 was found to be mainly located in nonendothelial cells, as shown by the levels measured in intact aortas without an endothelium in both control rats and those receiving Ang II. Possible explanations are that (1) ET-1 is produced in endothelial cells9 and then most of the peptide is released abluminally toward the underlying SMCs30 or that (2) ET-1 is synthesized locally in VSMCs of the media.15 The latter explanation is more likely, because VSMCs do synthesize ET-1 and are quantitatively dominant in intact blood vessels. Furthermore, inhibition of Ang II–induced ET production by losartan suggests that AT1 receptors, which are expressed in VSMCs, are modulated by vascular ET-1 production in vivo, thus confirming results obtained in cell culture systems.16 29 In the present study, verapamil had no effect on tissue ET-1 levels despite its beneficial effects on blood pressure and restoration of endothelial function. The reason for this phenomenon is unclear. It can be speculated that calcium antagonists, which may interfere with endothelial ET-1 release,10 31 32 do not affect the ET system in VSMCs, which were shown to be the primary location of ET-1 induced by Ang II in this study. This hypothesis may also help explain the different antihypertensive effects of losartan and verapamil, which is also supported by their differential effects on tissue ET-1 content. Indeed, blockade of ETA receptors, which lowered blood pressure to the same extend as verapamil, completely abolished the Ang II increase in aortic ET-1 content.33 Interestingly, in healthy mountaineers, nifedipine was ineffective in lowering increased plasma ET-1 levels induced by high-altitude hypoxia.34

A relationship between increased aortic ET-1 content and functional vascular changes is further suggested by the observation that aortic contractions to exogenous ET were inversely related to tissue levels of this peptide. Thus, it can be argued that the contribution of ET to the elevation of blood pressure is negligible, since elevated tissue ET levels are compensated for by decreased vasoconstriction efficacy. However, we and others have previously shown that an ETA receptor antagonist prevents part of the pressure rise in the same model of hypertension.25 35 The decreased contractions to ET-1 in Ang II–induced hypertension are likely due to receptor downregulation, because these contractions were inversely related to the local peptide content. Furthermore, alterations of the signal transduction pathways appear unlikely to explain the blunted constriction to ET-1 in Ang II–induced hypertension, because ET-1 shares common signaling pathways with other agents and reactivity to these agents was improved by verapamil.31 This statement is supported by experiments that show that calcium channel antagonists do not inhibit the contractions to ET-1 in rat aortas36 and in human mammary arteries37 in vitro.

Although verapamil did not modulate elevated ET-1 levels, endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxations were improved, an effect shared by losartan. The improvement in endothelium-dependent relaxations therefore appears to be related to an improved sensitivity of VSMCs to NO, as illustrated by the results obtained with the NO donor SNP. Long-term blockade of ETA receptors only partially improved endothelial function, whereas endothelium-independent relaxations to SNP were unaffected.25 This finding suggests that the improvement in endothelial function is mediated at least partially via the selective activation of ETB receptors, which in turn release NO or prostacyclin. Indeed, a recent study has confirmed our previous observations.38

Endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH were enhanced in Ang II–induced hypertension. Concomitant treatment with either drug normalized the contractions to ACH. Responses of VSMCs to an agonist acting at the thromboxane A2/prostaglandin H2 receptor level, such as the thromboxane analogue U46619, were, however, comparable, suggesting enhanced production of prostanoids (which may interfere with endothelium-derived NO) as a likely mechanism.1 39 These data are in line with previous reports in renin-dependent hypertension.40 41

There are now several pieces of evidence suggesting an interaction between the renin-angiotensin system and ET in diseases with increased activation of the renin-angiotensin system, such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, or hypertension.17 42 43 44 In support of a link between Ang II and ET production, another study demonstrated that long-term inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme in experimental congestive heart failure abolished activation of the local tissue ET system.45 Blockade of the renin-angiotensin or ET system may therefore be important for therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular disease.3 43 46

In conclusion, this study shows that in Ang II–induced hypertension, losartan but not verapamil prevents Ang II–induced increases in tissue ET-1 levels and impaired contractions to ET-1. In contrast, blockade of AT1 receptors and L-type calcium channels lowered SBP, normalized aortic endothelium-dependent relaxations to ACH, and decreased the release of endothelium-derived contracting factors. Thus, local vascular ET protein expression in Ang II–induced hypertension appears to be at least partly independent of blood pressure and endothelial function.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
ACH = acetylcholine
Ang II = angiotensin II
AT1, AT2 = angiotensin type 1 or type 2 receptor
ET = endothelin
L-NAME = N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
NE = norepinephrine
NO = nitric oxide
SBP = systolic blood pressure
SNP = sodium nitroprusside
(V)SMC = (vascular) smooth muscle cell


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (grant No. 3200-051069.97/1) and a grant-in-aid from Merck Sharp & Dohme–Chibret AG, Glattbrugg, Switzerland. Dr d'Uscio was a recipient of a stipend from the Intermedia Foundation, Bern, Switzerland. Dr Barton was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ba 1543/1-1) and the Adumed Foundation. The authors wish to thank Pierre Moreau for fruitful scientific discussion and Christian Binggeli for his excellent support in software programming.

Received December 10, 1997; first decision January 5, 1998; accepted January 23, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Lüscher TF, Vanhoutte PM. The Endothelium: Modulator of Cardiovascular Function. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press; 1990:1–215.

2. Dzau VJ. Local expression and pathophysiological role of renin-angiotensin in the blood vessels and heart. In: Grobecker H, Heusch G, Strauer BE, eds. Angiotensin and the Heart. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff Verlag; 1993:1–14.

3. Teerlink JR. Neurohumoral mechanisms in heart failure: a central role for the renin-angiotensin system. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27:S1–S8.

4. Dubey RK, Jackson EK, Lüscher TF. Nitric oxide inhibits angiotensin II-induced migration of rat aortic smooth muscle cell: role of cyclic-nucleotides and angiotensin 1 receptors. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:141–149.

5. Boulanger CM, Caputo L, Lévy BI. Endothelial AT1-mediated release of nitric oxide decreases angiotensin II contractions in rat carotid artery. Hypertension. 1995;26:752–757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Seyedi N, Xu X, Nasjletti A, Hintze TH. Coronary kinin generation mediates nitric oxide release after angiotensin receptor stimulation. Hypertension. 1995;26:164–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Hennington BS, Zhang H, Granger JP, Reckelhoff JF. Angiotensin II chronically increases endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein in the kidneys of rats. Hypertension. 1997;30:481. Abstract.

8. Wilcox CS, Welch WJ. Thromboxane mediation of the pressor response to infused angiotensin II. Am J Hypertens. 1990;3:242–249.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411–415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Emori T, Hirata Y, Ohta K, Kanno K, Eguchi S, Imai T, Shichiri M, Marumo F. Cellular mechanism of endothelin-1 release by angiotensin and vasopressin. Hypertension. 1991;18:165–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Imai T, Hirata Y, Emori T, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T, Marumo F. Induction of endothelin-1 gene by angiotensin and vasopressin in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1992;19:753–757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Dubin D, Pratt RE, Cooke JP, Dzau VJ. Endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor, is a vascular smooth muscle mitogen. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:13–17.

13. Hirata Y, Takagi Y, Fukuda Y, Marumo F. Endothelin is a potent mitogen for rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Atherosclerosis. 1989;78:225–228.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Paul M, Zintz M, Böcker W, Dyer M. Characterization and functional analysis of the rat endothelin-1 promoter. Hypertension. 1995;25:683–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Hahn AWA, Resink TJ, Scott-Burden T, Powell J, Dohi Y, Bühler FR. Stimulation of endothelin mRNA and secretion in rat vascular smooth muscle cells: a novel autocrine function. Cell Regul. 1990;1:649–659.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Sung CP, Arleth AJ, Storer BL, Ohlstein EH. Angiotensin type 1 receptors mediate smooth muscle proliferation and endothelin biosynthesis in rat vascular smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;271:429–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Moreau P, d'Uscio LV, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M, Lüscher TF. Angiotensin II increases tissue endothelin and induces vascular hypertrophy: reversal by ETA-receptor antagonist. Circulation. 1997;96:1593–1597.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Dohi Y, Hahn A, Boulanger CM, Bühler FR, Lüscher TF. Endothelin stimulated by angiotensin II augments contractility of spontaneously hypertensive rat resistance arteries. Hypertension. 1992;19:131–137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Novosel D, Lang MG, Noll G, Lüscher TF. Endothelial dysfunction in aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive, stroke-prone rat: effects of therapy with verapamil and trandolapril alone and in combination. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24:979–985.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Tschudi MR, Criscione L, Novosel D, Pfeiffer K, Lüscher TF. Antihypertensive therapy augments endothelium-dependent relaxations in coronary arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1994;89:2212–2218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Münzel T, Tarpey M, Freeman BA, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation: contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1916–1923.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Auch-Schwelk W, Katusic ZS, Vanhoutte PM. Thromboxane A2 receptor antagonists inhibit endothelium-dependent contractions. Hypertension. 1990;15:699–703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Auch-Schwelk W, Katusic ZS, Vanhoutte PM. Contractions to oxygen-derived free radicals are augmented in aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1989;13:859–864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Rees DD, Palmer RMJ, Hodson HF, Moncada S. A specific inhibitor of nitric oxide formation from L-arginine attenuates endothelium-dependent relaxation. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;96:418–424.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. d'Uscio LV, Moreau P, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M, Lüscher TF. Effects of chronic ETA receptor blockade in angiotensin II–induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;29:435–441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss J. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 1980;47:1–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Rosenthal T, Erlich Y, Rosenmann E, Cohen A. Effects of enalapril, losartan, and verapamil on blood pressure and glucose metabolism in the Cohen-Rosenthal diabetic hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1997;29:1260–1264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Küng CF, Moreau P, Takase H, Lüscher TF. L-NAME hypertension alters endothelial and smooth muscle function in rat aorta: prevention by trandolapril and verapamil. Hypertension. 1995;26:744–751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Bakris GL, Bhandaru S, Akerstrom V, Re RN. ACE inhibitor-mediated attenuation of mesangial cell growth: a role for endothelin. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:583–590.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Wagner OF, Christ G, Wojta J, Vierhapper H, Parzer S, Nowotny PJ, Schneider B, Waldhausl W, Binder BR. Polar secretion of endothelin-1 by cultured endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:16066–16068.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Vanhoutte PM. Vascular endothelium and Ca2+ antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Suppl. 1988;12(suppl 6):S21–S28.

32. Himmel HM, Whorton AR, Strauss HC. Intracellular calcium, currents, and stimulus-response coupling in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1993;21:112–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Barton M, Shaw S, d'Uscio LV, Moreau P, Lüscher TF. Angiotensin II increases vascular and renal endothelin-1 and functional endothelin converting enzyme activity in vivo: role of ETA-receptors for endothelin regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;238:861–865.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Goerre S, Wenk M, Bartsch P, Lüscher TF, Niroomand F, Hohenhaus E, Oelz O, Reinhart WH. Endothelin-1 in pulmonary hypertension associated with high-altitude exposure. Circulation. 1995;91:359–364.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Rajagopalan S, Laursen JB, Borthayre A, Kurz S, Keiser J, S. H, Giaid A, Harrison DG. Role for endothelin-1 in angiotensin II–mediated hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;30:29–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Chabrier PE, Auguet M, Roubert P, Lonchampt MO, Gillard V, Guillon JM, Delaflotte S, Braquet P. Vascular mechanism of action of endothelin-1: effect of Ca2+ antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989;13(suppl 5):S32–S35.

37. Yang Z, Bauer E, von Segesser L, Stulz P, Turina M, Lüscher TF. Different mobilization of calcium in endothelin-1-induced contractions in human arteries and veins: effects of calcium antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1990;16:654–660.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Verhaar MC, Strachan FE, Newby DE, Cruden NL, Koomans HA, Webb DJ, Rabelink T. Blockade of the endothelin-A receptor increases endogenous NO generation. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-348. Abstract.

39. Lüscher TF, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine in the aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Hypertension. 1986;8:344–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Mistry M, Nasjletti A. Role of pressor prostanoids in rats with angiotensin II-salt-induced hypertension. Hypertension. 1988;11:758–762.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Lin L, Mistry M, Stier C Jr, Nasjletti A. Role of prostanoids in renin-dependent and renin-independent hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;17:517–525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Spinale FG, Walker JD, Mukherjee R, Iannini JP, Keever AT, Gallagher KP. Concomitant endothelin receptor subtype-A blockade during the progression of pacing-induced congestive heart failure in rabbits: beneficial effects on left ventricular and myocyte function. Circulation. 1997;95:1918–1929.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Yazaki Y, Yamazaki T. Reversing congestive heart failure with endothelin receptor antagonist. Circulation. 1997;95:1752–1754.[Free Full Text]

44. Watanabe T, Suzuki N, Shimamoto N, Fujino M, Imada A. Endothelin in myocardial infarction. Nature. 1990;344:114. Letter.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Clavell AL, Mattingly MT, Stevens TL, Nir A, Wright S, Aarhus LL, Heublein DM, Burnett JC Jr. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition modulates endogenous endothelin in chronic canine thoracic inferior vena caval constriction. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1286–1292.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Liu YH, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Sabbah HN, Peterson E, Carretero O. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure: role for kinins and angiotensin II type 2 receptors. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1926–1935.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
F. Bohm and J. Pernow
The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2007; 76(1): 8 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
W. M Maharsy, L. N Kadi, N. G Issa, K. M Bitar, A. H Der-Boghossian, R. Abrahamian, and A. B Bikhazi
Cross-talk related to insulin and angiotensin II binding on myocardial remodelling in diabetic rat hearts
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 59 - 65.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith
Activation of Endothelin-A Receptors Contributes to Angiotensin-Induced Suppression of Renal Sensory Nerve Activation
Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. J. An, R. Boyd, Y. Wang, X. Qiu, and H. D. Wang
Endothelin-1 expression in vascular adventitial fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H700 - H708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T.-M. Lee, M.-S. Lin, T.-F. Chou, C.-H. Tsai, and N.-C. Chang
Effect of pravastatin on development of left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H220 - H227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. C. Kowala, N. Murugesan, J. Tellew, K. Carlson, H. Monshizadegan, C. Ryan, Z. Gu, B. Kane, L. Fadnis, R. A. Baska, et al.
Novel Dual Action AT1 and ETA Receptor Antagonists Reduce Blood Pressure in Experimental Hypertension
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 275 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Ying, M. Flamant, S. Vandermeersch, J.-J. Boffa, C. Chatziantoniou, J.-C. Dussaule, and D. Chansel
Renal Effects of Omapatrilat and Captopril in Salt-Loaded, Nitric Oxide-Deficient Rats
Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 937 - 944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
L. E. Spieker and T. F. Luscher
Endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure--a refutation of a bold conjecture?
Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2003; 5(4): 415 - 417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
K. Moridaira, J. Morrissey, M. Fitzgerald, G. Guo, R. McCracken, T. Tolley, and S. Klahr
ACE inhibition increases expression of the ETB receptor in kidneys of mice with unilateral obstruction
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): F209 - F217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. C. Sullivan, D. M. Pollock, and J. S. Pollock
Altered Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 Distribution in Mesenteric Arteries of Hypertensive Rats
Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 597 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. Fakhouri, S. Placier, R. Ardaillou, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou
Angiotensin II Activates Collagen Type I Gene in the Renal Cortex and Aorta of Transgenic Mice through Interaction with Endothelin and TGF-{beta}
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2701 - 2710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Ballew and G. D. Fink
Role of endothelin ETB receptor activation in angiotensin II-induced hypertension: effects of salt intake
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): H2218 - H2225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Ballew and G. D. Fink
Role of ETA receptors in experimental ANG II-induced hypertension in rats
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): R150 - R154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
W. Boemke, B. Hocher, N. Schleyer, M. O. Krebs, and G. Kaczmarczyk
Hemodynamic, renal, and endocrine responses to acute ETA blockade at different ANG II plasma levels
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1322 - R1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
B. T. Alexander, K. L. Cockrell, A. N. Rinewalt, J. N. Herrington, and J. P. Granger
Enhanced renal expression of preproendothelin mRNA during chronic angiotensin II hypertension
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1388 - R1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
J. R. Ballew, S. W. Watts, and G. D. Fink
Effects of Salt Intake and Angiotensin II on Vascular Reactivity to Endothelin-1
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 13, 2001; 296(2): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
T. Quaschning, L. V. d'Uscio, S. Shaw, and T. F. Luscher
Vasopeptidase Inhibition Exhibits Endothelial Protection in Salt-Induced Hypertension
Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1108 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. F. Luscher and M. Barton
Endothelins and Endothelin Receptor Antagonists : Therapeutic Considerations for a Novel Class of Cardiovascular Drugs
Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2434 - 2440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
T. F Lüscher
Endothelial dysfunction: the role and impact of the renin-angiotensin system
Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(90001): 20i - 22.
[Full Text]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Geiger, A.-P. Zou, W. B. Campbell, and P.-L. Li
Inhibition of cADP-Ribose Formation Produces Vasodilation in Bovine Coronary Arteries
Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 397 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J.-J. Boffa, P.-L. Tharaux, S. Placier, R. Ardaillou, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou
Angiotensin II Activates Collagen Type I Gene in the Renal Vasculature of Transgenic Mice During Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthesis : Evidence for an Endothelin-Mediated Mechanism
Circulation, November 2, 1999; 100(18): 1901 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by d'Uscio, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lüscher, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by d'Uscio, L. V.
Right arrow Articles by Lüscher, T. F.