From Cardiovascular Research, Institute of Physiology, University of
Zürich, and the Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Zürich,
and the Division of Cardiology and Department of Clinical Research, University
Hospital, Bern (S.S.), Switzerland.
Correspondence to Thomas F. Lüscher, MD, FACC, FESC, Professor and Head of Cardiology, University Hospital, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland. E-mail 100771.1237{at}compuserve.com
ET-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide1 9 and
acts as a mitogen and trophic factor in cultured
VSMCs.12 13 The Ang IIinduced expression of
pre-pro-ET mRNA and subsequent ET-1 synthesis occur not only in
cultured vascular endothelial
cells9 10 11 14 but also in
nonendothelial cells such as rat VSMCs through its
interaction with the AT1 but not the
AT2 receptor.15 16
Long-term treatment with Ang II increases tissue ET-1 content and
induces vascular hypertrophy of small arteries, effects
that are totally prevented by ETA receptor
blockade,17 suggesting that this interaction
between the vascular renin-angiotensin system and ET-1 is
also operative in vivo. Furthermore, in mesenteric arteries of
spontaneously hypertensive rats, Ang II induces vascular
production of ET-1 and thereby augments the contractile
responses to NE in an endothelium-dependent
manner.18 Although calcium channel blockers lower
arterial pressure and improve
endothelium-dependent relaxations in experimental
models of hypertension,19 20 the long-term
effects of calcium channel blockade in Ang IIinduced hypertension and
vascular ET production in this model are not known.
The present study was designed to investigate the effects of
long-term treatment with the AT1 receptor
antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker
verapamil in Ang IIinduced hypertension, with special
emphasis on the ET pathway and its effects on
endothelium-dependent and -independent vascular
reactivity of isolated rat aortas.
Experimental Setup
Protocols
Endothelium-dependent contractions were tested in
quiescent rings incubated with the NO synthase inhibitor
L-NAME at 10-4 mol/L for 30
minutes24 alone or with SQ30741
(10-7 mol/L). Cumulative concentrations of ACH
(10-9 to 10-4 mol/L) were
then added to the organ baths. Contractions to ET-1
(10-11 to 10-7 mol/L)
were studied in aortic rings pretreated with or without SQ30741 at
10-7 mol/L. Contractile responsiveness of
vascular smooth muscle to NE (10-10 to
10-5 mol/L) and U46619
(10-10 to 10-6 mol/L) was
also obtained.
Measurement of Tissue ET-1 Levels
Drugs
Statistical Analysis
Tissue ET-1 Levels
Vascular Contractions
Long-term treatment with Ang II increased
endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH
(P<0.05; Table 2
Vascular Relaxations
Maximal endothelium-independent relaxations to the NO
donor SNP were comparable in all groups, but the sensitivity was
shifted to the right in the Ang II group (P<0.05 versus
control group). Both losartan and verapamil
normalized endothelium-independent relaxations
(P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Figure 3B
The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role as a
modulator of vascular structure and function in arterial
hypertension.2 However, it is still unclear
whether and to what extent endothelial dysfunction
contributes to vascular changes and whether these changes in the
vascular ET system are due to changes in endothelial
function or blood pressure. In this study, the calcium channel blocker
verapamil only partially prevented the increase in SBP
induced by long-term administration of Ang II at a dose that was
comparable to those that have been shown to prevent elevation of
arterial pressure in different animal models of
hypertension.19 27 28 In line with previous
observations, losartan abolished the Ang IIinduced increase
in SBP.21 Whereas losartan prevented the
Ang IIinduced increases in local aortic ET-1 concentrations,
verapamil had no effect on tissue levels of this peptide.
Ang II has been previously reported to stimulate expression of
pre-pro-ET mRNA9 11 14 and to increase the
release of the mature peptide in cultured endothelial
cells,10 VSMCs,15 16 and
mesangial cells29 in vitro. In this
study, however, vascular ET-1 was found to be mainly located in
nonendothelial cells, as shown by the levels measured
in intact aortas without an endothelium in both control
rats and those receiving Ang II. Possible explanations are that (1)
ET-1 is produced in endothelial
cells9 and then most of the peptide is released
abluminally toward the underlying SMCs30 or that
(2) ET-1 is synthesized locally in VSMCs of the
media.15 The latter explanation is more likely,
because VSMCs do synthesize ET-1 and are quantitatively dominant in
intact blood vessels. Furthermore, inhibition of Ang IIinduced ET
production by losartan suggests that
AT1 receptors, which are expressed in VSMCs, are
modulated by vascular ET-1 production in vivo, thus confirming
results obtained in cell culture systems.16 29 In
the present study, verapamil had no effect on tissue
ET-1 levels despite its beneficial effects on blood pressure and
restoration of endothelial function. The reason for
this phenomenon is unclear. It can be speculated that calcium
antagonists, which may interfere with
endothelial ET-1 release,10 31 32
do not affect the ET system in VSMCs, which were shown to be the
primary location of ET-1 induced by Ang II in this study. This
hypothesis may also help explain the different antihypertensive effects
of losartan and verapamil, which is also supported
by their differential effects on tissue ET-1 content. Indeed, blockade
of ETA receptors, which lowered blood pressure to
the same extend as verapamil, completely abolished the Ang
II increase in aortic ET-1 content.33
Interestingly, in healthy mountaineers, nifedipine was
ineffective in lowering increased plasma ET-1 levels induced by
high-altitude hypoxia.34
A relationship between increased aortic ET-1 content and functional
vascular changes is further suggested by the observation that aortic
contractions to exogenous ET were inversely related to tissue levels of
this peptide. Thus, it can be argued that the contribution of ET to the
elevation of blood pressure is negligible, since elevated tissue ET
levels are compensated for by decreased vasoconstriction efficacy.
However, we and others have previously shown that an
ETA receptor antagonist prevents part
of the pressure rise in the same model of
hypertension.25 35 The decreased contractions to
ET-1 in Ang IIinduced hypertension are likely due to receptor
downregulation, because these contractions were inversely related to
the local peptide content. Furthermore, alterations of the signal
transduction pathways appear unlikely to explain the blunted
constriction to ET-1 in Ang IIinduced hypertension, because ET-1
shares common signaling pathways with other agents and reactivity to
these agents was improved by verapamil.31 This
statement is supported by experiments that show that calcium channel
antagonists do not inhibit the contractions to ET-1 in rat
aortas36 and in human mammary
arteries37 in vitro.
Although verapamil did not modulate elevated ET-1 levels,
endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxations were
improved, an effect shared by losartan. The improvement in
endothelium-dependent relaxations therefore appears to
be related to an improved sensitivity of VSMCs to NO, as illustrated by
the results obtained with the NO donor SNP. Long-term blockade of
ETA receptors only partially improved
endothelial function, whereas
endothelium-independent relaxations to SNP were
unaffected.25 This finding suggests that the
improvement in endothelial function is mediated at
least partially via the selective activation of
ETB receptors, which in turn release NO or
prostacyclin. Indeed, a recent study has confirmed our previous
observations.38
Endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH were enhanced
in Ang IIinduced hypertension. Concomitant treatment with either drug
normalized the contractions to ACH. Responses of VSMCs to an agonist
acting at the thromboxane
A2/prostaglandin
H2 receptor level, such as the
thromboxane analogue U46619, were, however, comparable,
suggesting enhanced production of prostanoids (which may
interfere with endothelium-derived NO) as a likely
mechanism.1 39 These data are in line with
previous reports in renin-dependent
hypertension.40 41
There are now several pieces of evidence suggesting an interaction
between the renin-angiotensin system and ET in diseases
with increased activation of the
renin-angiotensin system, such as myocardial infarction,
heart failure, or hypertension.17 42 43 44 In
support of a link between Ang II and ET production, another
study demonstrated that long-term inhibition of
angiotensin-converting enzyme in experimental congestive
heart failure abolished activation of the local tissue ET
system.45 Blockade of the
renin-angiotensin or ET system may therefore be important
for therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular
disease.3 43 46
In conclusion, this study shows that in Ang IIinduced hypertension,
losartan but not verapamil prevents Ang IIinduced
increases in tissue ET-1 levels and impaired contractions to ET-1. In
contrast, blockade of AT1 receptors and L-type
calcium channels lowered SBP, normalized aortic
endothelium-dependent relaxations to ACH, and decreased
the release of endothelium-derived contracting factors.
Thus, local vascular ET protein expression in Ang IIinduced
hypertension appears to be at least partly independent of blood
pressure and endothelial function.
Received December 10, 1997;
first decision January 5, 1998;
accepted January 23, 1998.
2.
Dzau VJ. Local expression and
pathophysiological role of
renin-angiotensin in the blood vessels and heart. In:
Grobecker H, Heusch G, Strauer BE, eds. Angiotensin
and the Heart. Darmstadt, Germany: Steinkopff Verlag; 1993:114.
3.
Teerlink JR. Neurohumoral mechanisms in heart failure:
a central role for the renin-angiotensin system.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27:S1S8.
4.
Dubey RK, Jackson EK, Lüscher TF. Nitric oxide
inhibits angiotensin II-induced migration of rat aortic
smooth muscle cell: role of cyclic-nucleotides and
angiotensin 1 receptors. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:141149.
5.
Boulanger CM, Caputo L, Lévy BI.
Endothelial AT1-mediated release of nitric oxide
decreases angiotensin II contractions in rat carotid
artery. Hypertension. 1995;26:752757.
6.
Seyedi N, Xu X, Nasjletti A, Hintze TH.
Coronary kinin generation mediates nitric oxide release after
angiotensin receptor stimulation. Hypertension. 1995;26:164170.
7.
Hennington BS, Zhang H, Granger JP, Reckelhoff JF.
Angiotensin II chronically increases
endothelial nitric oxide synthase protein in the
kidneys of rats. Hypertension. 1997;30:481. Abstract.
8.
Wilcox CS, Welch WJ. Thromboxane mediation of
the pressor response to infused angiotensin II.
Am J Hypertens. 1990;3:242249.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y,
Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent
vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular
endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411415.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Emori T, Hirata Y, Ohta K, Kanno K, Eguchi S, Imai T,
Shichiri M, Marumo F. Cellular mechanism of endothelin-1 release by
angiotensin and vasopressin. Hypertension. 1991;18:165170.
11.
Imai T, Hirata Y, Emori T, Yanagisawa M, Masaki T,
Marumo F. Induction of endothelin-1 gene by angiotensin and
vasopressin in endothelial cells.
Hypertension. 1992;19:753757.
12.
Dubin D, Pratt RE, Cooke JP, Dzau VJ. Endothelin, a
potent vasoconstrictor, is a vascular smooth muscle mitogen. J
Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:1317.
13.
Hirata Y, Takagi Y, Fukuda Y, Marumo F. Endothelin is a
potent mitogen for rat vascular smooth muscle cells.
Atherosclerosis. 1989;78:225228.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Paul M, Zintz M, Böcker W, Dyer M.
Characterization and functional analysis of the rat
endothelin-1 promoter. Hypertension. 1995;25:683687.
15.
Hahn AWA, Resink TJ, Scott-Burden T, Powell J, Dohi Y,
Bühler FR. Stimulation of endothelin mRNA and secretion in rat
vascular smooth muscle cells: a novel autocrine function. Cell
Regul. 1990;1:649659.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Sung CP, Arleth AJ, Storer BL, Ohlstein EH.
Angiotensin type 1 receptors mediate smooth muscle
proliferation and endothelin biosynthesis in rat vascular smooth
muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;271:429437.
17.
Moreau P, d'Uscio LV, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M,
Lüscher TF. Angiotensin II increases tissue
endothelin and induces vascular hypertrophy: reversal by
ETA-receptor antagonist.
Circulation. 1997;96:15931597.
18.
Dohi Y, Hahn A, Boulanger CM, Bühler FR,
Lüscher TF. Endothelin stimulated by angiotensin II
augments contractility of spontaneously hypertensive
rat resistance arteries. Hypertension. 1992;19:131137.
19.
Novosel D, Lang MG, Noll G, Lüscher TF.
Endothelial dysfunction in aorta of the spontaneously
hypertensive, stroke-prone rat: effects of therapy with
verapamil and trandolapril alone and in combination.
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1994;24:979985.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Tschudi MR, Criscione L, Novosel D, Pfeiffer K,
Lüscher TF. Antihypertensive therapy augments
endothelium-dependent relaxations in coronary
arteries of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Circulation. 1994;89:22122218.
21.
Rajagopalan S, Kurz S, Münzel T, Tarpey M,
Freeman BA, Griendling KK, Harrison DG. Angiotensin
II-mediated hypertension in the rat increases vascular superoxide
production via membrane NADH/NADPH oxidase activation:
contribution to alterations of vasomotor tone. J Clin
Invest. 1996;97:19161923.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Auch-Schwelk W, Katusic ZS, Vanhoutte PM.
Thromboxane A2 receptor antagonists inhibit
endothelium-dependent contractions.
Hypertension. 1990;15:699703.
23.
Auch-Schwelk W, Katusic ZS, Vanhoutte PM. Contractions
to oxygen-derived free radicals are augmented in aorta of the
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1989;13:859864.
24.
Rees DD, Palmer RMJ, Hodson HF, Moncada S. A specific
inhibitor of nitric oxide formation from
L-arginine attenuates endothelium-dependent
relaxation. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;96:418424.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
d'Uscio LV, Moreau P, Shaw S, Takase H, Barton M,
Lüscher TF. Effects of chronic ETA receptor
blockade in angiotensin IIinduced hypertension.
Hypertension. 1997;29:435441.
26.
Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, Fleiss J. Some statistical
methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res. 1980;47:19.
27.
Rosenthal T, Erlich Y, Rosenmann E, Cohen A. Effects of
enalapril, losartan, and verapamil on blood
pressure and glucose metabolism in the Cohen-Rosenthal
diabetic hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1997;29:12601264.
28.
Küng CF, Moreau P, Takase H, Lüscher TF.
L-NAME hypertension alters endothelial and smooth
muscle function in rat aorta: prevention by trandolapril and
verapamil. Hypertension. 1995;26:744751.
29.
Bakris GL, Bhandaru S, Akerstrom V, Re RN. ACE
inhibitor-mediated attenuation of mesangial
cell growth: a role for endothelin. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:583590.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Wagner OF, Christ G, Wojta J, Vierhapper H, Parzer S,
Nowotny PJ, Schneider B, Waldhausl W, Binder BR. Polar secretion of
endothelin-1 by cultured endothelial cells.
J Biol Chem. 1992;267:1606616068.
31.
Vanhoutte PM. Vascular endothelium and
Ca2+ antagonists. J
Cardiovasc Pharmacol Suppl. 1988;12(suppl 6):S21S28.
32.
Himmel HM, Whorton AR, Strauss HC. Intracellular
calcium, currents, and stimulus-response coupling in
endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1993;21:112127.
33.
Barton M, Shaw S, d'Uscio LV, Moreau P, Lüscher
TF. Angiotensin II increases vascular and renal
endothelin-1 and functional endothelin converting enzyme activity in
vivo: role of ETA-receptors for endothelin
regulation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;238:861865.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Goerre S, Wenk M, Bartsch P, Lüscher TF,
Niroomand F, Hohenhaus E, Oelz O, Reinhart WH. Endothelin-1 in
pulmonary hypertension associated with high-altitude exposure.
Circulation. 1995;91:359364.
35.
Rajagopalan S, Laursen JB, Borthayre A, Kurz S, Keiser
J, S. H, Giaid A, Harrison DG. Role for endothelin-1 in
angiotensin IImediated hypertension.
Hypertension. 1997;30:2934.
36.
Chabrier PE, Auguet M, Roubert P, Lonchampt MO, Gillard
V, Guillon JM, Delaflotte S, Braquet P. Vascular mechanism of action of
endothelin-1: effect of Ca2+
antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol.
1989;13(suppl 5):S32S35.
37.
Yang Z, Bauer E, von Segesser L, Stulz P, Turina M,
Lüscher TF. Different mobilization of calcium in
endothelin-1-induced contractions in human arteries and veins: effects
of calcium antagonists. J Cardiovasc
Pharmacol. 1990;16:654660.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Verhaar MC, Strachan FE, Newby DE, Cruden NL, Koomans
HA, Webb DJ, Rabelink T. Blockade of the endothelin-A receptor
increases endogenous NO generation. Circulation.
1997;96(suppl I):I-348. Abstract.
39.
Lüscher TF, Vanhoutte PM.
Endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine in
the aorta of the spontaneously hypertensive rat.
Hypertension. 1986;8:344348.
40.
Mistry M, Nasjletti A. Role of pressor prostanoids in
rats with angiotensin II-salt-induced hypertension.
Hypertension. 1988;11:758762.
41.
Lin L, Mistry M, Stier C Jr, Nasjletti A. Role of
prostanoids in renin-dependent and renin-independent hypertension.
Hypertension. 1991;17:517525.
42.
Spinale FG, Walker JD, Mukherjee R, Iannini JP, Keever
AT, Gallagher KP. Concomitant endothelin receptor subtype-A blockade
during the progression of pacing-induced congestive heart failure in
rabbits: beneficial effects on left ventricular and myocyte
function. Circulation. 1997;95:19181929.
43.
Yazaki Y, Yamazaki T. Reversing congestive heart
failure with endothelin receptor antagonist.
Circulation. 1997;95:17521754.
44.
Watanabe T, Suzuki N, Shimamoto N, Fujino M, Imada A.
Endothelin in myocardial infarction. Nature. 1990;344:114.
Letter.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Clavell AL, Mattingly MT, Stevens TL, Nir A, Wright S,
Aarhus LL, Heublein DM, Burnett JC Jr. Angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibition modulates endogenous
endothelin in chronic canine thoracic inferior vena caval
constriction. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:12861292.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Liu YH, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Sabbah HN, Peterson
E, Carretero O. Effects of angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1
receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure: role for
kinins and angiotensin II type 2 receptors. J
Clin Invest. 1997;99:19261935.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions
Losartan but Not Verapamil Inhibits Angiotensin IIInduced Tissue Endothelin-1 Increase
Role of Blood Pressure and Endothelial Function
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
AbstractEndothelin partially
mediates angiotensin (Ang) IIinduced vascular changes in
vivo. This study investigated the effects of the
angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist
losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil
on vascular reactivity and tissue endothelin-1 levels in aortas of
Wistar-Kyoto rats treated for 2 weeks with Ang II (200 ng ·
kg-1 · min-1). Ang II increased
systolic blood pressure (39±4 mm Hg,
P<0.05). Concomitant treatment with losartan
abolished the Ang IIinduced pressure increase
(P<0.05), whereas verapamil reduced it only
partially (P<0.05). In the aortas of rats with Ang
IIinduced hypertension, tissue endothelin-1 content was increased
threefold and contractions to endothelin-1 were impaired
(P<0.05). Interestingly, these alterations were
normalized by losartan (P<0.05) but not by
verapamil. Hence, there was a strong, negative correlation
between contractions to endothelin-1 and tissue endothelin-1 content
(r=-0.733, P<0.0001). In contrast, both
antihypertensive drugs normalized impaired
endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and
reduced the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle to sodium
nitroprusside compared with Ang IItreated rats
(P<0.05). Ang IIinduced hypertension enhanced
endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine,
and these were normalized by either drug. In conclusion, these findings
suggest that long-term treatment with Ang II modulates endothelin-1
protein expression in the rat aorta. Although both antihypertensive
agents lowered blood pressure and normalized
endothelial function, only losartan prevented
the increase in tissue endothelin-1 content, suggesting that
angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists but not
calcium antagonists modulate tissue endothelin-1 in vivo.
Key Words: angiotensin II endothelin endothelium losartan verapamil aorta
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Angiotensin II is an
important mediator contributing to cardiovascular
diseases such as hypertension, congestive heart failure, and renal
failure.1 2 3 Ang II has multiple effects as a
local modulator of vascular tone in an autocrine and paracrine manner
via specific angiotensin receptors.2
Ang IIinduced proliferation of rat VSMCs is mediated via the
AT1 receptor.4 Ang II also
stimulates the release of relaxant factors such as
NO5 6 7 and constricting factors such as
prostanoids8 and ET-1 in
endothelial cells.9 10 11
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Experimental Animals
Male normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats 9 weeks old were obtained
from IFFA Credo (L'Arbresle, France) and maintained on standard rat
chow with free access to drinking water at the animal facilities of the
University Hospital Bern. All experimental protocols for animal
research were approved by the local authorities of Bern, Switzerland.
At the age of 10 weeks, rats were randomly assigned to 1 of the
following 4 groups: (1) a control group (fed standard chow and water),
(2) an Ang II group, (3) an Ang II plus losartan group, and (4)
an Ang II plus verapamil group. Ang II was administered by
subcutaneously implanted osmotic pumps (model 2002, Alzet Corp)
delivering 200 ng · kg-1 ·
min-1 for 14 days. The dosages of
losartan and verapamil were based on previous
studies,19 21 and the drugs were administered
with the powdered chow at an average dose of 14±1 and 63±1 mg
· kg-1 · d-1,
respectively. Body weights of the rats were monitored before and at the
end of treatment. SBP and heart rate were measured in conscious rats by
a tail-cuff method with the use of a pulse transducer (model LE 5000,
Letica) before treatment and at the time when the rats were used for
the following experiments at the age of 12 weeks. Then the rats were
anesthetized (thiopental, 50 mg/kg body weight IP) and
decapitated. The aortas were isolated and placed immediately into cold
(4°C) modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution (in mmol/L):
NaCl 118.6, KCl 4.7, CaCl2 2.5,
MgSO4 1.2,
KH2PO4 1.2,
NaHCO3 25.1, EDTA 0.026, and glucose 10.1.
In Krebs solution each thoracic aorta was dissected free from
connective tissue while being viewed under a microscope (Leica Wild
M3C) and cut into rings 4 mm long. Rings were mounted horizontally
between fixed and movable stainless stirrups, connected to a force
transducer for recording isometric tension (Statham Universal
UTC2), and then placed in an organ bath filled with 25 mL Krebs
solution. The solutions were maintained at 37°C and aerated
continuously with 95% O2/5%
CO2 gas. After an equilibration period of 30
minutes, the rings were progressively stretched to their optimal
passive tension (2.5±0.2 g) as assessed by the response to 100
mmol/L KCl in modified Krebs solution, which was prepared by equimolar
replacement of NaCl with KCl in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate solution.
Contractions to KCl did not differ between the rats in the control
group (3.75±0.06 mN/mm) and those treated with Ang II (3.81±0.09
mN/mm), Ang II plus losartan (3.94±0.08 mN/mm), or Ang II plus
verapamil (3.81±0.07 mN/mm). The stretched ring segments
were equilibrated for 30 minutes before the experiment.
For investigation of endothelium-dependent
relaxations, aortic rings from the four experimental groups were
incubated with or without SQ30741 (a prostaglandin
H2/thromboxane
A2 receptor antagonist) at
10-7 mol/L for 30
minutes22 or SOD (a superoxide anion scavenger)
at 150 U/mL for 5 minutes.23 Rings were
precontracted with NE (1 to 3x10-7 mol/L) and
then relaxed with ACH (10-9 to
10-4 mol/L). For
endothelium-independent relaxation, rings were
precontracted with NE (1 to 3x10-7 mol/L) and
relaxed with 10-10 to
10-5 mol/L SNP. Precontractions to NE were
comparable in all treatment groups.
Dissected aortic rings were frozen in LN2
and kept at -80.25°C until assayed. In addition, rat aortas from
control and Ang II groups were denuded of endothelium
by scraping with a scalpel blade. Measurements were performed in a
blinded fashion (n=6 per group). Frozen vessels were crushed, weighed,
and homogenized as described
elsewhere.17 25 Eluates were dried in a vacuum
centrifugal evaporator and reconstituted in working assay buffer for
radioimmunoassay. The overall recovery of ET-1 added to
chloroform/methanol vessel homogenates and taken through
all extraction steps was 65±3%, with interassay and intraassay
coefficients of 5.6% and 10%, respectively (n=6).
The following drugs were used for the protocols: ACH HCl,
L-NE bitartrate, U46619
(9,11-dideoxy-11
,9
-epoxymethanoprostaglandin
F2
), SNP dihydrate, Cu/Zn SOD (from bovine
erythrocytes; 4400 U/mg protein), L-NAME, Ang II (all from Sigma
Chemical Co), and SQ30741 (Squibb Institute for Medical Research,
Princeton, NJ). ET-1 was purchased from Novabiochem/Calbiochem
AG. Losartan and verapamil were provided by Merck
Sharp & DohmeChibret AG and Knoll AG, respectively. All drugs were
dissolved in distilled water except ET-1 and SQ30741, which were
prepared in 0.1% BSA solution and in 10% ethanol, respectively. Then
all drugs were diluted in Krebs solution and expressed as final molar
concentrations in the organ bath.
The contractions were expressed as a percentage of 100
mmol/L KClinduced contractions, which were obtained at the beginning
of each experiment. Results are presented as mean±SEM. In all
experiments, n equals the number of rats per experiment. For
statistical analysis, the sensitivity of the vessels to the
drugs was expressed as the negative logarithm of the concentration that
caused half-maximal relaxation or contraction. Maximal relaxation
(expressed as a percentage of precontraction) or contraction was
determined for each individual concentration-response curve by
nonlinear regression analysis with the use of MatLab software.
For simple comparison between two values, paired Student's
t test was used. For multiple comparisons, results were
analyzed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's
correction.26 Pearson's correlation coefficients
were calculated by linear regression. A value of P<0.05 was
considered significant.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Characteristics of Animals
The Ang IIinduced increase in SBP was abolished by concomitant
oral treatment with losartan but was prevented only partially
by verapamil (P<0.05 versus Ang II group;
Figure 1A
and Table 1
). Heart rate was lowered only in rats
that received verapamil (P<0.05 versus Ang II
group; Table 1
). Body weights are also shown in Table 1
.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Net increase in SBP (A) and tissue ET-1 levels (B)
in rat aortas after 2 weeks of treatment with different
regimens. Results are mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs
control;
P<0.05 vs Ang II group (ANOVA+Bonferroni's
correction).
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Characteristics of the Rats Measured After 2 Weeks
of Treatment With Different Regimens
The ET-1 tissue content in the aortas with an intact
endothelium was increased threefold by Ang II treatment
(P<0.05 versus control; Figure 1B
). In aortas without an
endothelium, basal ET-1 levels were 65±7% of those
with endothelium in the control group and 64±5% of
those in the Ang II group (P=NS). Losartan but not
verapamil completely prevented the Ang IIinduced increase
in peptide content (P<0.05 versus Ang II group; Figure 1B
).
Reduced vascular reactivity to ET-1 was almost normalized by
long-term administration of losartan only (P<0.05
versus Ang II group for the maximal response). Maximal contractions to
ET-1 and local tissue ET-1 concentrations were inversely correlated
(r=-0.733, P<0.0001, n=24; Figure 2B
). Contractions to ET-1 were unaffected
by SQ30741 in all groups (data not shown; n=6 or 7 per group). In
contrast to contractions to ET-1, long-term treatment with either
losartan or verapamil normalized the impaired
contractions to NE observed in the Ang IItreated rats
(P<0.05 for the maximal response; Table 2
).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. A, Contractions to ET-1 in rat aortic rings after
2 weeks of treatment with different regimens. Contractions are
expressed as percentage of 100 mmol/L KCl, and results are
mean±SEM. *P<0.05 vs control;
P<0.05 vs Ang
II group (ANOVA and Bonferroni). B, Linear inverse relationship between
maximal contractions to ET-1 and tissue concentrations of ET-1 in rat
aortas.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Maximal and Half-Maximal Contraction and Sensivity
Values of Different Vasoactive Agents in Aortas of Wistar-Kyoto Rats
After 2 Weeks of Treatment With Different Regimens
) in quiescent aortic rings with an intact
endothelium in the presence of L-NAME. Concomitant
treatment with either losartan or verapamil
normalized endothelium-dependent contractions
(P<0.05; Table 2
). SBP was highly correlated with
endothelium-dependent contractions to ACH
(r=0.804, P<0.0001, n=25). Contractions to ACH
were abolished in all groups after preincubation with SQ30741 and
L-NAME (P<0.05, n=6; data not shown). The contractions to
the thromboxane analogue U46619 did not differ in any of
the treatment groups (Table 2
).
In Ang IIinduced hypertensive animals,
endothelium-dependent relaxations to ACH in the aorta
were markedly impaired compared with control (Figure 3A
; P<0.05). Both
losartan and verapamil improved
endothelium-dependent relaxations to a similar degree
(Figure 3A
; P<0.05), which were unaffected by SQ30741 or
SOD (data not shown). The sensitivity of the concentration-response
curves to ACH did not differ among the groups.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Endothelium-dependent relaxations
to ACH (A) and endothelium-independent relaxations to
the NO donor SNP (B) in rat aortic rings after 2 weeks of treatment
with different regimens. Results are mean±SEM and expressed as percent
relaxation from contraction to NE. *P<0.05 vs control;
P<0.05 vs Ang II group (ANOVA and Bonferroni).
).
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that
alterations of the vascular ET pathway in Ang IIinduced hypertension
are completely normalized by the AT1 receptor
antagonist losartan. In contrast, the calcium
channel blocker verapamil did not affect Ang IIinduced
increases in tissue ET-1 content or contractions to this peptide
in the aorta, despite verapamil's beneficial effects on
SBP, endothelial dysfunction, and impaired reactivity
to other vasoconstrictors.
![]()
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
ACH
=
acetylcholine
Ang II
=
angiotensin II
AT1, AT2
=
angiotensin type 1 or type 2 receptor
ET
=
endothelin
L-NAME
=
N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl
ester
NE
=
norepinephrine
NO
=
nitric oxide
SBP
=
systolic blood pressure
SNP
=
sodium nitroprusside
(V)SMC
=
(vascular) smooth muscle cell
![]()
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Swiss National Foundation
(grant No. 3200-051069.97/1) and a grant-in-aid from Merck Sharp &
DohmeChibret AG, Glattbrugg, Switzerland. Dr d'Uscio was a recipient
of a stipend from the Intermedia Foundation, Bern, Switzerland. Dr
Barton was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ba
1543/1-1) and the Adumed Foundation. The authors wish to thank Pierre
Moreau for fruitful scientific discussion and Christian Binggeli for
his excellent support in software programming.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Lüscher TF, Vanhoutte PM. The
Endothelium: Modulator of
Cardiovascular Function. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC
Press; 1990:1215.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bohm and J. Pernow The importance of endothelin-1 for vascular dysfunction in cardiovascular disease Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2007; 76(1): 8 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M Maharsy, L. N Kadi, N. G Issa, K. M Bitar, A. H Der-Boghossian, R. Abrahamian, and A. B Bikhazi Cross-talk related to insulin and angiotensin II binding on myocardial remodelling in diabetic rat hearts Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2007; 8(2): 59 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. C. Kopp, M. Z. Cicha, and L. A. Smith Activation of Endothelin-A Receptors Contributes to Angiotensin-Induced Suppression of Renal Sensory Nerve Activation Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): 141 - 147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. An, R. Boyd, Y. Wang, X. Qiu, and H. D. Wang Endothelin-1 expression in vascular adventitial fibroblasts Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H700 - H708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-M. Lee, M.-S. Lin, T.-F. Chou, C.-H. Tsai, and N.-C. Chang Effect of pravastatin on development of left ventricular hypertrophy in spontaneously hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): H220 - H227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Kowala, N. Murugesan, J. Tellew, K. Carlson, H. Monshizadegan, C. Ryan, Z. Gu, B. Kane, L. Fadnis, R. A. Baska, et al. Novel Dual Action AT1 and ETA Receptor Antagonists Reduce Blood Pressure in Experimental Hypertension J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 275 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ying, M. Flamant, S. Vandermeersch, J.-J. Boffa, C. Chatziantoniou, J.-C. Dussaule, and D. Chansel Renal Effects of Omapatrilat and Captopril in Salt-Loaded, Nitric Oxide-Deficient Rats Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 937 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Spieker and T. F. Luscher Endothelin receptor antagonists in heart failure--a refutation of a bold conjecture? Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2003; 5(4): 415 - 417. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Moridaira, J. Morrissey, M. Fitzgerald, G. Guo, R. McCracken, T. Tolley, and S. Klahr ACE inhibition increases expression of the ETB receptor in kidneys of mice with unilateral obstruction Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): F209 - F217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Sullivan, D. M. Pollock, and J. S. Pollock Altered Nitric Oxide Synthase 3 Distribution in Mesenteric Arteries of Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, February 1, 2002; 39(2): 597 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Fakhouri, S. Placier, R. Ardaillou, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou Angiotensin II Activates Collagen Type I Gene in the Renal Cortex and Aorta of Transgenic Mice through Interaction with Endothelin and TGF-{beta} J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2701 - 2710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ballew and G. D. Fink Role of endothelin ETB receptor activation in angiotensin II-induced hypertension: effects of salt intake Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): H2218 - H2225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ballew and G. D. Fink Role of ETA receptors in experimental ANG II-induced hypertension in rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): R150 - R154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Boemke, B. Hocher, N. Schleyer, M. O. Krebs, and G. Kaczmarczyk Hemodynamic, renal, and endocrine responses to acute ETA blockade at different ANG II plasma levels Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1322 - R1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. T. Alexander, K. L. Cockrell, A. N. Rinewalt, J. N. Herrington, and J. P. Granger Enhanced renal expression of preproendothelin mRNA during chronic angiotensin II hypertension Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): R1388 - R1392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Ballew, S. W. Watts, and G. D. Fink Effects of Salt Intake and Angiotensin II on Vascular Reactivity to Endothelin-1 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 13, 2001; 296(2): 345 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Quaschning, L. V. d'Uscio, S. Shaw, and T. F. Luscher Vasopeptidase Inhibition Exhibits Endothelial Protection in Salt-Induced Hypertension Hypertension, April 1, 2001; 37(4): 1108 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Luscher and M. Barton Endothelins and Endothelin Receptor Antagonists : Therapeutic Considerations for a Novel Class of Cardiovascular Drugs Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2434 - 2440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F Lüscher Endothelial dysfunction: the role and impact of the renin-angiotensin system Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(90001): 20i - 22. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Geiger, A.-P. Zou, W. B. Campbell, and P.-L. Li Inhibition of cADP-Ribose Formation Produces Vasodilation in Bovine Coronary Arteries Hypertension, January 1, 2000; 35(1): 397 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-J. Boffa, P.-L. Tharaux, S. Placier, R. Ardaillou, J.-C. Dussaule, and C. Chatziantoniou Angiotensin II Activates Collagen Type I Gene in the Renal Vasculature of Transgenic Mice During Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthesis : Evidence for an Endothelin-Mediated Mechanism Circulation, November 2, 1999; 100(18): 1901 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |