From the First Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine,
Kyushu University, Fukuoka (S.O., Y.N.), and the Department of Bioclimatology
and Medicine, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Oita
(M.S., N.M., S.S., T.H.), Japan.
Correspondence to M. Sugano, MD, Department of Bioclimatology and Medicine, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, 4546 Tsurumihara, Beppu, Oita 874-0838, Japan.
Measurement of Plasma ACE Activity
Measurement of Collagen Concentration
Histomorphometric Study
Isolation of Total RNA and Quantification of mRNAs
Statistical Analysis
Received February 2, 1998;
first decision March 5, 1998;
accepted April 28, 1998.
2.
Jalil JE, Doering CW, Janicki JS, Pick R, Shroff S,
Weber KT. Fibrillar collagen and myocardial stiffness in the intact
hypertrophied rat left ventricle. Circ Res. 1989;64:10411050.
3.
Adams MA, Bobik A, Korner PI. Differential development
of vascular and cardiac hypertrophy in genetic
hypertension: relation to sympathetic function.
Hypertension. 1989;14:191202.
4.
Korner P, Bobik A, Oddie C, Friberg P. Sympathoadrenal
system is critical for structural changes in genetic hypertension.
Hypertension. 1993;22:243252.
5.
Johnson CI. Tissue angiotensin converting
enzyme in cardiac and vascular hypertrophy, repair, and
remodeling. Hypertension. 1994;23:258268.
6.
Paquet JL, Bandomin-Legros M, Brunelle G, Meyer P.
Angiotensin II-induced proliferation of aortic myocytes in
spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1990;8:565572.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Geistefer AAT, Peach MJ, Owens GK.
Angiotensin II induces hypertrophy but not
hyperplasia of rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1990;62:749756.
8.
Kato H, Suzuki H, Tajima S, Ogata Y, Tominaga T, Sato
A, Saruta T. Angiotensin II stimulates collagen synthesis
in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens. 1991;9:1722.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Keeley FW, Elmoselhi A, Leenen FHH. Enalapril
suppresses normal accumulation of elastin and collagen in
cardiovascular tissues of growing rats. Am J
Physiol. 1992;262:H1013H1021.
10.
Powell JS, Clozel JP, Muller RKM, Kuhn H, Hefti F,
Hosang M, Baumgartner HR. Inhibitors of
angiotensin-converting enzyme prevents myointimal
proliferation after vascular injury. Science. 1989;245:186188.
11.
Yoshida H, Kakuchi J, Guo DF, Furuta H, Iwai N, Jong R,
Inagami T, Ichikawa I. Analysis of the evolution of
angiotensin II type 1 receptor gene in mammals (mouse, rat,
bovine and human). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;186:10421049.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
de Gasparo M, Husain A, Alexander W, Catt KJ, Chiu AT,
Frew M, Goodfriend T, Harding JW, Inagami T, Timmermans PBMWM. Proposed
update of angiotensin receptor nomenclature.
Hypertension. 1995;25:924927.
13.
Gottlieb SS, Dickstein K, Fleck E, Kostis J, Levine B,
LeJemtel T, DeKock M. Hemodynamic and neurohumoral
effects of the angiotensin II antagonist
losartan in patients with congestive heart failure.
Circulation. 1993;88(pt 1):16021609.
14.
Ichiki T, Labosky PA, Shiota C, Okuyama S, Inagawa Y,
Fogo A, Niimura F, Ichikawa I, Hogan BLM, Inagami T. Effects on blood
pressure and exploratory behavior of mice lacking
angiotensin II type-2 receptor. Nature. 1995;377:748750.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Hei L, Barsh GS, Pratt RE, Dzau VJ, Koblika BK.
Behavioural and cardiovascular effects of disrupting
the angiotensin II type-2 receptor gene in mice.
Nature. 1995;377:744747.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Levy BI, Benessiano J, Henrion D, Caputo L, Heymes C,
Duriez M, Poitevin P, Samuel JL. Chronic blockade of
AT2-subtype receptors prevents the effect of
angiotensin II on the rat vascular structure. J
Clin Invest. 1996;98:418425.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Benetos A, Lacolley P, Safar ME. Prevention of aortic
fibrosis by spironolactone in spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:11521156.
18.
Widdop RE, Gardiner SM, Kemp PA, Bennett T. Central
administration of PD123319 or EXP-3174 inhibits effects of
angiotensin II. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H117H125.
19.
Hayakari M, Kondoh Y, Ihumi H. A rapid and simple
spectrophotometric assay of angiotensin-converting enzyme.
Anal Biochem. 1978;84:361369.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Makino N, Sugano M, Otsuka S, Hata T. Molecular
mechanism of angiotensin II type I and type II receptors in
cardiac hypertrophy of spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1997;30:796802.
21.
Sugano M, Makino N, Yanaga T. The effects of
renin-angiotensin system inhibition on aortic
cholesterol content in cholesterol-fed rabbits.
Atherosclerosis. 1996;127:123129.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Laurent GJ, Cockerill P, McAnulty RJ, Hastings JRB. A
simplified method for quantification of the relative amounts of type I
and type III collagen in small tissue samples. Anal Biochem. 1981;113:301312.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Bergman I, Loxley R. Two improved and simplified
methods for the spectrophotometric determination of hydroxyproline.
Anal Chem. 1961;35:19611965.
24.
Makino N, Hata T, Sugano M, Dixon IMC, Yanaga T.
Regression of hypertrophy after myocardial infarction is
produced by the chronic blockade of angiotensin type 1
receptor in rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996;28:507517.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Murphy TJ, Alexander RW, Griendling KK, Runge MS,
Bernstein KE. Isolation of a cDNA encoding the vascular type-1
angiotensin II receptor. Nature (Lond). 1991;351:233236.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Stoll M, Steckelings UM, Paul M, Bottari SP, Metzger R,
Unger T. The angiotensin AT2-receptor
mediates inhibition of cell proliferation in coronary
endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:651653.
27.
Fort PH, Marty I, Piechaczyk M, Sabrouty SEI, Dani CH,
Jeanteur PH, Blanchard JM. Various rat adult tissues express only one
major mRNA species from the
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase multigenic
family. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13:14311442.
28.
Albaladejo P, Bouaziz H, Duriez M, Gohlke P, Levy BI,
Safer ME, Benetos A. Angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibition prevents the increase in aortic collagen.
Hypertension. 1994;23:7482.
29.
Owens GK. Influence of blood pressure on the
development of aortic medial smooth muscle hypertrophy in
spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1987;9:178187.
30.
Kim S, Ohta K, Hamaguchi A, Omura T, Yukimura T, Miura
K, Inada Y, Ishigami Y, Chatani F, Iwao H. Angiotensin II
type I receptor antagonist inhibits the gene expression of
transforming growth factor-beta 1 and extracellular matrix in cardiac
and vascular tissues of hypertensive rats. J Pharmacol Exp
Ther. 1995;273:509515.
31.
Benetos A, Safar ME. Aortic collagen, aortic stiffness
and AT1 receptors in experimental and human
hypertension. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1996;94:862866.
32.
Deyl Z, Jelinek J, Macek K, Chaldakov G, Vankov VN.
Collagen and elastin synthesis in the aorta of spontaneously
hypertensive rats. Blood Vessels. 1987;24:313320.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Notoya M, Nakamura M, Mizojiri K. Effect of
lisinopril on the structure of renal arterioles.
Hypertension. 1996;27:364370.
34.
Lee RMKW, Berecek KH, Tsoporis J, McKenzie R, Triggle
CR. Prevention of hypertension and vascular changes by captopril
treatment. Hypertension. 1991;17:141150.
35.
Sabri A, Levy BI, Poitevin P, Caputo L, Faggin E,
Marotte F, Rappaport L, Samuel JL. Differential roles of
AT1 and AT2 receptor
subtypes in vascular trophic and phenotypic changes in response to
stimulation with angiotensin II. Arterioscler Thromb
Vasc Biol. 1997;17:257264.
36.
Regitz-Zagrosek V, Auch-Schwelk W, Hess B, Klein U,
Duske E, Steffen C, Hildebrandt AG, Fleck E. Tissue and subtype
specific modulation of angiotensin II receptors by chronic
treatment with cyclosporin A, angiotensin-converting enzyme
inhibitors and AT1
antagonists. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:6672.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Haddad G, Amiri F, Garcia R. Modulation of renal
glomerular angiotensin II receptors by ACE
inhibition and AT1 receptor antagonism.
Regul Peptides. 1997;68:111117.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Weber KT, Sun Y, Guarda E. Structural remodeling
in hypertensive heart disease and the role of hormones.
Hypertension. 1994;23(pt 2):869877.
39.
Brilla CG, Matsbara LS, Weber KT. Antifibrotic effects
of spironolactone in preventing myocardial fibrosis in systemic
arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:12A16A.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions
Interaction of mRNAs for Angiotensin II Type 1 and Type 2 Receptors to Vascular Remodeling in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
AbstractWe administered
angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor type 1 (AT1)
blockade (losartan, 40 mg · kg-1 ·
d-1), type II receptor (AT2) blockade
(PD123319, 100 mg · kg-1 ·
d-1), or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)
inhibitor (enalapril, 30 mg · kg-1
· d-1) to spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) from 10
to 20 weeks of age. Control SHR and Wister-Kyoto rats (WKY) received a
placebo for the same period. At the end of treatment, losartan
and enalapril were both found to have significantly reduced the
arterial systolic blood pressure and the collagen
concentration to the level of WKY, whereas PD123319 had no effect.
Enalapril and PD123319 significantly reduced the media cross-sectional
area of the aorta in comparison to that of untreated SHR, which was
still larger than that of the WKY; however, losartan did not
change it. Using reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction, we
next examined the mRNA expressions for ACE, AT1 receptor,
and AT2 receptor in experimental animals. We observed
significantly enhanced mRNA expression for AT1 and
AT2 receptors and ACE in untreated SHR compared with WKY.
The AT1 mRNA level was also significantly decreased in the
SHR treated with either losartan or enalapril, whereas the
AT2 mRNA level was significantly decreased in the SHR
treated with either PD123319 or enalapril in comparison to untreated
SHR. The level of ACE mRNA was significantly decreased only in the SHR
treated with enalapril. These results indicate that AT1
receptor, but not AT2 receptor, plays a crucial role in the
remodeling of matrix tissue, while AT2 receptor may play a
role in the development of hypertrophy of smooth muscle in
aorta in SHR, and that the reduction of hypertrophy of
smooth muscle does not fully account for the suppression of
hypertension.
Key Words: angiotensin II receptors, angiotensin hypertrophy, vascular collagen rats, inbred SHR
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Long-term
hypertension is reported to be associated with
cardiovascular remodeling, which consists of
cardiovascular hypertrophy and an increase
in the extracellular matrix (especially
collagen).1 2 In spontaneously hypertensive rats
(SHR), both left ventricular hypertrophy and
the properties of characteristic vascular resistance are already
present early in life, based on the results of a comparison with
normotensive Wister-Kyoto rats (WKY).3 4
Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
can lower the blood pressure in SHR mainly by reducing the
production of angiotensin II (Ang
II).5 Ang II is considered to act as a
growth-promoting factor in aortic smooth muscle
cells,6 7 while it also increases collagen
synthesis in smooth muscle cells.8 ACE
inhibitors suppress such vascular remodeling in
experimental models, possibly through blood pressureindependent
mechanisms.9 10 Recently, a selective Ang II
receptor antagonist has been developed that inhibits the
renin-angiotensin system (RAS) more specifically than ACE
inhibitors. Two main Ang II receptor subtypes,
AT1 and AT2, have been
identified, and some other subtypes have also been
described.11 12 The antihypertensive action of
losartan is based on the blockade of AT1
receptors, which are believed to mediate most of the
cardiovascular actions of Ang
II.13 AT2 receptor is also
involved in maintaining the systemic blood pressure and responsiveness
of the cardiovascular system to Ang
II.14 15 Two controversial reports have recently
been published. Levy et al16 reported that only
AT2 blockade, and not AT1
blockade, prevented the increased aortic media thickness and increased
extracellular matrix in Ang IIinduced hypertensive rats. On the other
hand, Benetos et al17 concluded that
spironolactone attenuates both the aortic media thickness and the
development of collagen through the inhibition of
AT1 receptor in SHR. However, there is little
information regarding the interaction of mRNAs for
AT1 and AT2 receptors and
ACE to the extracellular matrix and vascular hypertrophy.
In the present study, we therefore examined the effects of the
AT1 antagonist losartan, the
AT2 antagonist PD123319, or the ACE
inhibitor enalapril to selectively block the RAS on
vascular remodeling. We also investigated the molecular expression of
the aortic mRNA levels for AT1 and
AT2 receptors and ACE. These studies provide
information on how the RAS affects the extracellular matrix and
vascular hypertrophy, while also shedding some light on how
vascular RAS inhibition may attenuate vascular remodeling.
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Animals and Experimental Protocols
Male SHR at 5 weeks of age (n=32) and age-matched male WKY (n=6)
were used for this study. All animals were housed in a room where the
temperature, humidity, and light were controlled, and a standard rat
diet plus water was provided ad libitum. Systolic blood
pressure and heart rate were measured once a week using the tail-cuff
method. The ACE inhibitor enalapril, the
AT1 receptor antagonist
losartan, or the AT2 receptor
antagonist PD12331918 was then
administered daily to SHR from 10 to 20 weeks of age. The dose of each
drug was as follows: enalapril (30 mg ·
kg-1 · d-1, n=8),
losartan (40 mg · kg-1 ·
d-1, n=8), PD123319 (100 mg ·
kg-1 · d-1, n=8).
In contrast, the other SHR (n=8) and WKY (n=6) were treated with
vehicle from 10 to 20 weeks of age. All drugs were administered daily
through a stomach tube to the rats. At the end of the treatment with
each drug, body weight and blood pressure were measured. The rats were
killed by decapitation, and blood samples were drawn into chilled tubes
(4°C) containing 0.1% EDTA to determine the plasma ACE activity.
After the immediate removal of the thoracic aorta, the aorta was freed
from the adventitia and was washed with ice-cold 10 mmol/L
potassium phosphate buffer (pH 8.3) for the determination of the
collagen content and RNA isolation. The aortas were then frozen in
liquid nitrogen and kept for up to 2 weeks at -80°C until the assays
were performed. For the histological examination, the
lower part of the descending thoracic aorta was fixed in 10%
formaldehyde in saline and embedded in Parafilm. Losartan was a
gift of Merck, Sharp & Dohme Research Laboratories (Rahway, NJ).
PD123319 was kindly provided by Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research
Division (Ann Arbor, Mich).
Plasma ACE activity was measured using the modified method of
Hayakari et al19 as described
previously.20 21 The assay for the ACE activity
was performed in a 150-µL incubation mixture containing 80
mmol/L potassium phosphate buffer, pH 8.3, 600 mmol/L sodium
chloride, 3 mmol/L
hippuryl-L-histidyl-L-leucine (HHL), and the
sample. The reaction was initiated by the addition of the substrates at
37°C for 30 minutes. The reaction was terminated by immersion of the
test tubes into a boiling-water bath for 10 minutes. The enzyme
activity in the resulting supernatant fluid was determined based on
absorbance at 382 nm using the differential spectrophotometric method.
The control run was identical to the above procedure minus the
incubation.
The extraction and the digestion of the collagen were
performed using the modified method of Laurent et
al.22 Briefly,
20 mg of aorta was
homogenized with 1 mL of 70% formic acid. Cyanogen bromide
was added to this volume to produce a concentration of 20 mg/mL.
Nitrogen gas was then bubbled through the mixture, the tubes were
sealed, and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 24 hours at 25°C.
When the reaction was completed, the digest was centrifuged at
5000g for 20 minutes. The supernatant was dialyzed against
1% acetic acid, which was used for the measurement of the
hydroxyproline content and Western blot analysis of collagen
type 1, because the percentage of recovery of collagen was more than
95% in terms of hydroxyproline. The aortic collagen content was
measured by the hydroxyproline concentration of the tissue, as
described by Bergman and Loxley.23 The sample was
hydrolyzed in 6 N hydrochloric acid solution at 100°C. Then,
p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde (Ehrlich's reagent) dissolved
in buffer at pH 7.0 was added to form a complex with hydroxyproline.
The concentration of hydroxyproline was measured by a
spectrophotometric analysis at a wave length of 558 nm. The
concentration of hydroxyproline was expressed as micrograms of
hydroxyproline per milligram of protein, which was then measured by the
Lowry method. For the measurement of collagen type 1, a Western blot
analysis was performed using anti-rat collagen type 1 from
rabbit IgG (Chemicon International Inc) and anti-rabbit IgG from
goat (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories Inc), and the blots were
visualized by the ECL Western blot detection system (Amersham Corp).
The density of each band was analyzed with a densitometer
(model 620, Japan Bio-Rad). The amount of collagen type 1 was described
as the ratio to standard rat collagen (Biomedical Technologies
Inc).
Three successive 25-µm cross-sectional sections were stained
with hematoxylin and eosin. The size of the aorta was evaluated at a
low magnification (x40). The distance between the internal and
external elastic laminas, which contained smooth muscle cell layers,
was defined as the media. The media cross-sectional area of the aorta
was measured by planimetry from an enlarged color photograph.
Total RNA was isolated from the middle portion of the thoracic
aorta with RNAzolB solution (Biotex) according to a slight modification
of the manufacturer's procedure. Each mRNA (ACE,
AT1, AT2, and GAPDH) was
measured by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
as described previously.19 21 Briefly, 1 µg of
total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA and then amplified using an
RT-PCR kit (Gibco Life Technologies). A nonradiolabeled system (Gibco
Life Technologies) was used to label the PCR product with
biotin-14-dCTP. The amplification profile involved denaturation
at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 64°C for 1 minute, and extension
at 72°C for 1 minute. After we determined what ranges of the cycles
were exponential (after determining the efficiency of amplification) in
each mRNA, the PCR cycles for determining the amount of each mRNA were
established. For AT1
receptor,24 25 the sense primer was
5'-GCCAAAGTCACCTGCATCAT-3'; the anti-sense primer was
5'-AATTTTTTCCCCAGAAAGCC-3'; and the PCR product size was 494 bp, 26
cycles. For the AT2
receptor,19 26 the sense primer was
5'-TGAGTCCGCATTTAACTGC-3'; the anti-sense primer
was 5'-ACCACTGAGCATATTTCTCGGG-3'; and the PCR product size was
476 bp, 28 cycles. For ACE,24 the sense primer
was 5'-GACTGGTCCAACATCTATG-3'; the anti-sense primer was
5'-ATGAAGCTGACGAAGTACCT-3'; and the product size was 739
bp, 28 cycles. GAPDH (349 bp) was chosen as an internal control from
the rat cDNA24 27 (sense,
5'-CATGGTCTACATGTTCCAGT-3'; anti-sense, 5'-GGCTAAGCAGTTGGTGGTGC-3'; 12
cycles). After PCR was completed, 2 µL of each PCR product from
the same animal was applied to the same well of a 12.5%
polyacrylamide gel (Daiichi Pure Chemicals). After
electrophoresis, the amplified DNA was transferred to a nylon membrane,
and the blots were analyzed and visualized with a biotin
detection kit (Millipore) as described
previously.19 21 The density of each PCR band was
analyzed with a densitometer (model 620, Japan Bio-Rad). The
amount of mRNA was expressed as the ratio to GAPDH.
The data are given as the mean±SEM. Comparisons among 3 or more
groups were made using a 1-way ANOVA followed by Dunnetts' modified
t test. A value of P<0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Systolic blood pressure in the 20-week-old SHR was
significantly higher than that in the WKY. The administration of
losartan or enalapril to SHR significantly reduced the
systolic blood pressure to the level of WKY. However, the
administration of PD123319 had no effect on systolic blood
pressure (Table 1
). The plasma ACE
activity in the experimental animals at 20 weeks of age is also shown
in Table 1
. The ACE activity in the untreated SHR was significantly
increased in comparison to WKY. This activity was not significantly
different among the untreated SHR or the SHR treated with
losartan or PD123319. However, the ACE activity in the SHR
treated with enalapril decreased significantly to below the level of
WKY. Figure 1
shows a typical example of
collagen type 1 by Western blotting. The amounts of collagen type 1,
described as the ratio to standard rat collagen type 1, are shown in
Table 2
. The aortic hydroxyproline and
collagen type 1 concentrations in the untreated control SHR were almost
double those observed in the WKY, and they were prevented by enalapril
and losartan almost entirely through AT1
receptors (Table 2
). The extent of media hypertrophy,
expressed as the media cross-sectional area, was an increase of
50%
in untreated SHR, which was virtually unaffected by
AT1 block but was approximately halved by
enalapril and PD123319 (Table 2
). The internal radius in the untreated
SHR was significantly smaller than that in WKY, which was virtually
unchanged by AT2 block but was enlarged to the
same size as that of WKY by enalapril and losartan (Table 2
).
Figures 2
and 3
show typical examples of the PCR
products for the animals in all 5 groups. The amounts of aortic ACE
and AT1 and AT2 mRNA were
measured by scanning and expressed as a ratio to GAPDH mRNA; the
findings are shown in Figure 4
. Figure 4
shows that only enalapril inhibits local aortic ACE, which is
upregulated considerably in both untreated SHR and in SHR treated with
the 2 antagonists in comparison to WKY. The expression of
AT1 and AT2 mRNA was also
reduced by enalapril in comparison to the untreated SHR because of the
inhibition of both receptors. Each specific antagonist
lowered its own receptor mRNA, but there was "compensatory"
increased expression of the receptor mRNA that had not been blocked.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Systolic Blood Pressure and Plasma ACE
Activity

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Collagen type 1 concentration measured by Western
blot analysis for WKY, untreated SHR, and SHR treated with each
drug from 10 to 20 weeks. Marker indicates standard rat collagen.
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Aortic Collagen Content, Aortic Cross-Sectional
Area, and Internal Radius

View larger version (60K):
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Detection of ACE and AT1 mRNAs by
RT-PCR in aorta from WKY, untreated SHR, and SHR treated with each drug
from 10 to 20 weeks. GAPDH mRNA is an internal control. Marker
indicates molecular weight marker.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Detection of AT2 mRNAs by RT-PCR in
aorta from WKY, untreated SHR, and SHR treated with each drug from 10
to 20 weeks. GAPDH mRNA is an internal control. Marker indicates
molecular weight marker.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Amounts of aortic ACE, AT1, and
AT2 mRNA were measured by scanning and expressed as a ratio
to GAPDH mRNA. a indicates P<0.05 vs WKY; b,
P<0.05 vs SHR; c, P<0.05 vs
losartan; and d, P<0.05 vs enalapril. Values
are mean±SEM.
![]()
Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The present study demonstrated that chronic treatment with
losartan and enalapril normalized systolic blood
pressure and collagen concentration in the aorta of SHR, whereas
PD123319 had no effect on either. In contrast, the media
cross-sectional area was reduced with PD123319 and enalapril, and it
still remained well above the level in WKY. In the unpressurized aorta,
the media cross-sectional area is known to be a valid measure of
hypertrophy. These findings thus suggest that
AT1 has important actions on the extracellular
matrix, while AT2 has an important effect on the
hypertrophy of the smooth muscle. Ang II has been reported
to be involved in vascular hypertrophy and/or
hyperplasia.6 7 Arterial
hypertrophy and collagen content have been reported to be
specifically related to aortic ACE activity.28 In
our study, the aortic collagen content, the media cross-sectional area,
and plasma ACE activity increased in untreated SHR. In addition, aortic
ACE and AT1 and AT2 mRNA
also increased in untreated SHR. The hypertrophy of smooth
muscle cells has been considered to be highly influenced by blood
pres-sure, since some investigators have reported a positive
relationship between the arteriolar smooth muscle mass and blood
pressure in SHR.29 There is also a correlation
between the reduction of blood pressure and the decrease in the size of
the smooth muscle cells after drug treatment with ACE
inhibitors.1 28 In our study,
however, PD123319 suppressed both the aortic AT2
mRNA and the hypertrophy of the aortic smooth muscle to the
same degree as enalapril without any reduction in the blood pressure.
Regarding the reduction of hypertrophy in the smooth muscle
with ACE inhibitor, it thus appears to be important to
suppress AT2 receptor but not reduce the blood
pressure in SHR. The aortic collagen content was reported to be
specifically related to the aortic ACE activity independently of
hemodynamic factors, since aortic collagen was reduced
with ACE inhibitor but not with dihydralazine for
the same reduction of the blood pressure.29
AT1 receptor blockades have been shown to prevent
the development of the extracellular matrix30 and
the collagen accumulation to the same extent as ACE
inhibitor.31 In our study, the
suppression of AT1 by ACE inhibitor
or AT1 antagonist was also shown to
be important for reducing the collagen content in the aorta because
both losartan and enalapril normalized the
AT1 mRNA in the aorta and the collagen
concentration. Collagen type 1 increased the most in the aorta in SHR,
but this was also reduced by either ACE inhibitor or
AT1 antagonist. The amount of
collagen type 3 detected by Western blot analysis was small and
did not differ in the 5 groups (data not shown). From the 2 main
collagen types present, the synthesis of collagen type 1 exceeded
that of type 3 in the hypertensive period at >10 weeks of age in the
SHR.32 In our study, losartan did not
reduce media hypertrophy as much as enalapril did. Previous
treatment with ACE inhibitors showed an increase in the
diameter of renal afferent arteriole33 or a large
mesenteric artery.34 An increase in the lumen is
known to increase the average circumferential wall stress, which may
also provide nonspecific stimulus hypertrophy in SHR
treated with losartan. In our study, however, the vascular
internal lumen was not significantly different between the SHR treated
with enalapril and losartan, although the radius did increase
significantly in comparison to untreated SHR. The systolic
blood pressure did not differ significantly either. We thus can
speculate that AT1 receptor shows little relation
to media hypertrophy. It was recently reported that the
chronic blockade of AT2 receptor prevented
vascular hypertrophy in rats receiving a subcutaneous
infusion of Ang II.16 35 Levy et
al16 concluded that PD123319 prevented aortic
collagen accumulation but losartan had no effect. The
discrepancy between their findings and ours may be due mainly to
differences in the dosage and term of administration of the drugs used
and the animal models, which received a subcutaneous infusion of Ang II
for only 3 weeks. Furthermore, we also do not know how the drugs used
by Levy et al changed the ACE and AT1 and
AT2 mRNAs levels, since they did not examine
these levels. Some previous studies have showed subtypes of
angiotensin receptors to be downregulated by their
selective subtype-specific antagonists in other
organs.36 37 The present study for the first
time showed the information regarding the interaction of mRNAs for
AT1 and AT2 receptors and
ACE to the extracellular matrix and vascular hypertrophy.
In our study, all the treated SHR were given drugs between the ages of
10 to 20 weeks. By 10 weeks, changes in the vascular media had already
been established, so that the treatment was not aimed at suppression
but at reversing the established pathology, much as in human patients
with hypertension. Our findings suggest that the reversal of smooth
muscle hypertrophy, which is present at >10 weeks of
age, is not as easy as many think, although the aortic
hypertrophy is partially reversed by
AT2 inhibition. However, the increased aortic
collagen that is present at >10 weeks of age can be reversed to
normal levels by AT1 inhibition. Because
spironolactone decreased the aortic collagen and the
collagen-to-elastin ratio,17 possibly through the
inhibition of AT1
receptor,28 38 39 the AT1
antagonist losartan is expected to decrease the
arterial stiffness in hypertension. Although a similar
action may take place in human essential hypertension, further study is
called for to investigate these kinds of drugs regarding the regression
of vascular remodeling in the clinical treatment of hypertension.
![]()
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the
Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan. The authors thank
Sachiyo Taguchi, Miha Watanabe, and Yoshikazu Itoh for their valuable
technical assistance.
![]()
References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1.
Levy BI, Michel JB, Salzmann JL, Azizi M, Poitevin
P, Safer M, Camilleri JP. Effects of chronic inhibition of
converting enzyme on mechanical and structural properties of arteries
in rat renovascular hypertension. Circ Res. 1988;63:227239.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Serra and M. Bendersky Review: Atrial fibrillation and renin-angiotensin system Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Miller, L. E. Norton, M. P. Murphy, M. C. Dalsing, and J. L. Unthank The role of the renin-angiotensin system and oxidative stress in spontaneously hypertensive rat mesenteric collateral growth impairment Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2523 - H2531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wang, J. Zhang, G. Spinetti, L.-Q. Jiang, R. Monticone, D. Zhao, L. Cheng, M. Krawczyk, M. Talan, G. Pintus, et al. Angiotensin II Activates Matrix Metalloproteinase Type II and Mimics Age-Associated Carotid Arterial Remodeling in Young Rats Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2005; 167(5): 1429 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Igase, W. B. Strawn, P. E. Gallagher, R. L. Geary, and C. M. Ferrario Angiotensin II AT1 receptors regulate ACE2 and angiotensin-(1-7) expression in the aorta of spontaneously hypertensive rats Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1013 - H1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Brassard, F. Amiri, and E. L. Schiffrin Combined Angiotensin II Type 1 and Type 2 Receptor Blockade on Vascular Remodeling and Matrix Metalloproteinases in Resistance Arteries Hypertension, September 1, 2005; 46(3): 598 - 606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Guimaraes and H. Pinheiro Functional evidence that in the cardiovascular system AT1 angiotensin II receptors are AT1B prejunctionally and AT1A postjunctionally Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2005; 67(2): 208 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Perlegas, H. Xie, S. Sinha, A. V. Somlyo, and G. K. Owens ANG II type 2 receptor regulates smooth muscle growth and force generation in late fetal mouse development Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H96 - H102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Mabrouk, Q. N. Diep, K. Benkirane, R. M. Touyz, and E. L. Schiffrin SAM68: a downstream target of angiotensin II signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells in genetic hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1954 - H1962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yousufuddin, S. Haji, R. C. Starling, E. M. Tuzcu, N. B. Ratliff, D. J. Cook, A. Abdo, Y. Saad, S. S. Karnik, D. Wang, et al. Cardiac angiotensin II receptors as predictors of transplant coronary artery disease following heart transplantation Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2004; 25(5): 377 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yayama, M. Horii, H. Hiyoshi, M. Takano, H. Okamoto, S. Kagota, and M. Kunitomo Up-Regulation of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Rat Thoracic Aorta by Pressure-Overload J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2004; 308(2): 736 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Levy Can Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptors Have Deleterious Effects in Cardiovascular Disease?: Implications for Therapeutic Blockade of the Renin-Angiotensin System Circulation, January 6, 2004; 109(1): 8 - 13. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Boldt, U. Wetzel, J. Weigl, J. Garbade, J. Lauschke, G. Hindricks, H. Kottkamp, J. F. Gummert, and S. Dhein Expression of angiotensin II receptors in human left and right atrial tissue in atrial fibrillation with and without underlying mitral valve disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 19, 2003; 42(10): 1785 - 1792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hale, M. J. Shoichet, T. L. Bushfield, and M. A. Adams Time Course of Vascular Structural Changes During and After Short-Term Antihypertensive Treatment Hypertension, August 1, 2003; 42(2): 171 - 176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-L. Marchand, S. Der Sarkissian, P. Hamet, and D. deBlois Caspase-Dependent Cell Death Mediates the Early Phase of Aortic Hypertrophy Regression in Losartan-Treated Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Circ. Res., April 18, 2003; 92(7): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Berry, R. Touyz, A. F. Dominiczak, R. C. Webb, and D. G. Johns Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2001; 281(6): H2337 - H2365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zalba, G. S. Jose, M. U. Moreno, M. A. Fortuno, A. Fortuno, F. J. Beaumont, and J. Diez Oxidative Stress in Arterial Hypertension: Role of NAD(P)H Oxidase Hypertension, December 1, 2001; 38(6): 1395 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nagashima, Y. Sakomura, Y. Aoka, K. Uto, K.-i. Kameyama, M. Ogawa, S. Aomi, H. Koyanagi, N. Ishizuka, M. Naruse, et al. Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Mediates Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Apoptosis in Cystic Medial Degeneration Associated With Marfan's Syndrome Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104 (2009): I-282 - I-287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Intengan and E. L. Schiffrin Vascular Remodeling in Hypertension: Roles of Apoptosis, Inflammation, and Fibrosis Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 581 - 587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. El Mabrouk, R. M. Touyz, and E. L. Schiffrin Differential ANG II-induced growth activation pathways in mesenteric artery smooth muscle cells from SHR Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2001; 281(1): H30 - H39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zalba, G. S. Jose, F. J. Beaumont, M. A. Fortuno, A. Fortuno, and J. Diez Polymorphisms and Promoter Overactivity of the p22phox Gene in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells From Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Circ. Res., February 2, 2001; 88(2): 217 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz and E. L. Schiffrin Signal Transduction Mechanisms Mediating the Physiological and Pathophysiological Actions of Angiotensin II in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2000; 52(4): 639 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sadoshima Cytokine Actions of Angiotensin II Circ. Res., June 23, 2000; 86(12): 1187 - 1189. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zalba, F. J. Beaumont, G. S. Jose, A. Fortuno, M. A. Fortuno, J. C. Etayo, and J. Diez Vascular NADH/NADPH Oxidase Is Involved in Enhanced Superoxide Production in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35(5): 1055 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-S. Tea, S. Der Sarkissian, R. M. Touyz, P. Hamet, and D. deBlois Proapoptotic and Growth-Inhibitory Role of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats In Vivo Hypertension, May 1, 2000; 35(5): 1069 - 1073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chassagne, S. Eddahibi, C. Adamy, D. Rideau, F. Marotte, J.-L. Dubois-Randé, S. Adnot, J.-L. Samuel, and E. Teiger Modulation of Angiotensin II Receptor Expression during Development and Regression of Hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2000; 22(3): 323 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Barber, D. B. Sampey, and R. E. Widdop AT2 Receptor Stimulation Enhances Antihypertensive Effect of AT1 Receptor Antagonist in Hypertensive Rats Hypertension, November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1112 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Cao, R. Dean, L. Wu, D. Casley, and M. E. Cooper Role of Angiotensin Receptor Subtypes in Mesenteric Vascular Proliferation and Hypertrophy Hypertension, September 1, 1999; 34(3): 408 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Horiuchi, M. Akishita, and V. J. Dzau Recent Progress in Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Research in the Cardiovascular System Hypertension, February 1, 1999; 33(2): 613 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Touyz, D. Endemann, G. He, J.-S. Li, and E. L. Schiffrin Role of AT2 Receptors in Angiotensin II–Stimulated Contraction of Small Mesenteric Arteries in Young SHR Hypertension, January 1, 1999; 33(1): 366 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |