Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;32:746-752

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brodsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Winaver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brodsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Winaver, J.

(Hypertension. 1998;32:746-752.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Function and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats With Experimental Heart Failure

Sergey Brodsky; Konstantin Gurbanov; Zaid Abassi; Aaron Hoffman; Robert R. Ruffolo, Jr; Giora Z. Feuerstein; ; Joseph Winaver

From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (S.B., K.G., Z.A., A.H., J.W.), and Department of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pa (R.R.R., G.Z.F.).

Correspondence to Joseph Winaver, MD, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, The Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Efron St 1, POB 9649, Haifa 31096, Israel. E-mail winaver{at}tx.technion.ac.il


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Activation of the renin-angiotensin system may contribute to the derangement in renal and cardiac function in congestive heart failure. The present study evaluated the effects of eprosartan, a selective angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on renal hemodynamic and excretory parameters and on the development of cardiac hypertrophy in rats with aortocaval fistula, an experimental model of congestive heart failure. Infusion of eprosartan (1.0 mg/kg) in rats with aortocaval fistula produced a significant increase (+34%) in total renal blood flow and a sustained decrease (-33%) in the calculated renal vascular resistance. These effects on renal hemodynamics were more pronounced than those observed in sham-operated control rats and occurred despite a significant fall (-12%) in mean arterial blood pressure. Moreover, eprosartan caused a preferential increase in renal cortical blood perfusion and significantly increased glomerular filtration in rats with congestive heart failure. Chronic administration of eprosartan (5.0 mg/kg per day for 7 days through osmotic minipumps inserted intraperitoneally on the day of operation) resulted in a significant enhancement of urinary sodium excretion compared with nontreated rats with heart failure. Moreover, administration of eprosartan to salt-retaining rats with congestive heart failure resulted in a progressive increase and ultimate recovery in urinary sodium excretion. Finally, early treatment with eprosartan blocked the development of cardiac hypertrophy in rats with aortocaval fistula to a larger extent than the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. These findings emphasize the importance of angiotensin II in mediating the impairment in renal function and induction of cardiac hypertrophy in heart failure and further suggest that angiotensin II receptor blockade may be a useful treatment of these consequences in severe cardiac failure.


Key Words: angiotensin II • angiotensin antagonist • fistula, aortocaval • hypertrophy • renal circulation • hemodynamics • rats


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is considered an important reaction and one of the earliest compensatory neurohumoral responses to the decrease in pumping capacity of the failing myocardium in congestive heart failure (CHF).1 2 3 Although this mechanism may prove to be beneficial in the early stages of CHF, continuous activation of the system may become detrimental to cardiac and renal function.4 Angiotensin II (Ang II) plays a major role in this maladaptive response by promoting systemic vasoconstriction and increasing the abnormal loading conditions in the failing heart. In addition, Ang II, by virtue of its growth-promoting properties, may contribute to the development of cardiac hypertrophy as a result of a direct action on cardiac myocytes.5 Numerous studies have also indicated that activation of the RAAS is involved in mediating the deranged renal function in heart failure.1 6 7 The kidney appears to be uniquely sensitive to the vasoconstrictor action of Ang II, mainly in the efferent and afferent arterioles as well as on glomerular mesangial cells.8 In addition, Ang II increases tubular reabsorption of sodium, both by direct action on the nephron and by augmenting aldosterone release.1 9 The resultant renal hypoperfusion and the avid salt and water retention by the kidney may promote circulatory congestion and edema formation, which imposes a further circulatory overload on the failing myocardium. On the basis of these maladaptive responses of Ang II, one can envision that blocking the formation of the peptide may improve myocardial function in CHF. Indeed, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have revolutionized the clinical approach to patients with CHF, and the efficacy of these agents in improving cardiac performance and increasing life expectancy in severe heart failure is well established.10 11 12 13 However, it is also known that some of the cardiovascular effects of ACE inhibitors are mediated through their action on the kinin system, since they can be blocked by concomitant administration of bradykinin antagonists.14 15 Thus, other mechanisms not related directly to Ang II blockade may contribute to the beneficial actions of these drugs in heart failure.

The recent advancements in identification and cloning of the Ang II receptor subtypes AT1 and AT2 and the understanding that physiological actions of Ang II are mediated largely through activation of the AT1 receptor subtype have prompted the development of highly selective nonpeptide AT1 receptor antagonists.16 17 These potent agents, of which losartan (DuP 753) was the first to be studied, are of importance as research tools to probe the specific contribution of Ang II to the pathophysiological evolution of CHF, as well as novel therapeutic alternatives to ACE inhibitors. Initial studies with losartan in patients and experimental models of CHF have indicated a beneficial effect of this AT1 receptor antagonist in augmenting cardiac index and reducing left ventricular preload, systemic vascular resistance, and pulmonary capillary pressure.18 19 20 21 However, there is a clear paucity of information on the effects of the drug on the kidney, since only limited data are available on the renal actions of this class of drugs in experimental and neurohormonal CHF.22 23 24

In the present study we evaluated the effects of eprosartan, a nonbiphenyl tetrazole Ang II antagonist with potent renal vasodilatory activity,25 26 in rats with aortocaval (A-V) fistula, an experimental model of CHF. Previously, we demonstrated that this model is characterized by renal manifestations and neurohumoral changes that closely mimic those observed in patients with severe CHF.6 27 28 Moreover, we have shown that renal retention of salt and water in this experimental model is largely dependent on the degree of activation of the RAAS.6 In addition, rats with A-V fistula develop severe eccentric cardiac hypertrophy as a result of volume overload.27 29 30 In view of these characteristics, it was of interest to study the effects of eprosartan on renal function and cardiac hypertrophy in this experimental model of heart failure.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experiments were conducted on a local strain of male Wistar rats weighing 280 to 380 g that were maintained on a standard rat diet (containing 0.5% to 0.6% NaCl) and water ad libitum. CHF was induced by creating an arteriovenous fistula between the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava according to the method of Stumpe et al,31 as adapted in our laboratory.6 27 32 In short, the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava were exposed through a midabdominal incision under halothane anesthesia, and an anastomosis was surgically created in the common wall of the 2 vessels (1.0 to 1.2 mm OD, side to side). After surgery, the animals were allowed to recover and were then transferred into individual metabolic cages for daily measurements of urinary sodium and water excretion. Sham-operated rats served as controls.

Acute Studies
Six to 7 days after the operation, rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of thiobutabarbital (Inactin) (100 mg/kg, RBI), placed on a thermoregulated table (37°C), and prepared for hemodynamic and renal clearance measurements.6 28 After tracheotomy, polyethylene tubes (PE-50) were inserted into the left carotid artery and right jugular vein for blood pressure monitoring, blood sampling, and infusion of the various solutions. The urinary bladder was then catheterized by PE-50 through a suprapubic incision for timed urine collections. A solution of 0.9% saline was infused intravenously by a syringe pump, at a rate equal to 1.0% to 1.5% of body weight per hour, throughout the experiment. After a 60-minute equilibration period, the following experimental protocols were performed.

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Hemodynamics and Mean Arterial Pressure
Measurements of total renal blood flow (RBF) were performed by an ultrasonic flowmeter (model T206, Transonic Corp) with the use of an ultrasonic flow probe (type 1RB) placed around the midportion of the left renal artery, as previously described.28 Arterial blood pressure was continuously monitored with a pressure transducer (model 156PC05GWL, Microswitch) connected to the arterial line. Data of RBF and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were continuously recorded by a computerized data acquisition system with the use of Labtech Notebook software. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was calculated by the standard formula (RVR=MAP/RBF). In preliminary experiments we evaluated the effects of incremental doses of the drug (0.3, 1.0, and 3.0 mg/kg) on MAP and RBF in rats with CHF. On the basis of these experiments, the dose of 1.0 mg/kg was chosen for assessment in the present study. After surgery and equilibration, baseline measurements were obtained for 30 minutes. Eprosartan, dissolved in 20%/80% ethanol/saline mixture, was then injected intravenously at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg over a 5-minute period to control (n=6) and CHF (n=6) rats. Hemodynamic recordings were obtained for an additional 60 minutes after administration of the drug.

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Regional Blood Flow
For measurements of renal regional blood flow, the left kidney was exposed in control (n=6) and CHF rats (n=6) and placed in a Plexiglas holder with warm mineral oil (37°C) poured on the surface of the kidney at frequent intervals. Cortical and medullary blood flow (CBF and MBF, respectively) were measured simultaneously by laser-Doppler flowmetry with a dual-channel flowmeter (model 4001, Master Perimed AB) with 2 needle probes (Periflux 411), as previously described.33 Calibrated probes were placed perpendicular to the surface of the cortex and inserted into the outer medulla at a depth of 4 to 5 mm. Recordings of 30 seconds were obtained at 5-minute intervals during the baseline period. Eprosartan was then administered as described in the previous protocol, followed by 2 minutes of continuous recordings and then at 5-minute intervals for an additional 60 minutes. Regional blood flow was calculated in perfusion units (PU) by multiplying the velocity by the concentration of the moving blood cells and expressed as percent change from baseline value.

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Clearance Parameters
To evaluate the acute effects of the drug on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urinary sodium excretion, additional groups of control (n=7) and CHF (n=7) rats were prepared as described in previous protocols, with the exception that the abdominal cavity was not opened. A solution of 2% inulin in 0.9% saline was continuously infused throughout the experiment. After surgery and equilibration, 2 baseline periods of 30 minutes each were obtained. Eprosartan was then administered intravenously, followed by 3 additional clearance collections. Urine was collected into preweighed tubes, and urine volume was determined gravimetrically. Blood samples (0.3 mL) were obtained between each 2 clearance periods and at the end of the experiment. Plasma was separated by centrifugation and kept at 4°C until assayed for inulin and electrolytes.

Chronic Studies
These studies were designed to evaluate the effects of long-term administration (7 days) of eprosartan through osmotic minipumps (model 2001, Alzet Pharmaceutical) on urinary sodium excretion and on the development of cardiac hypertrophy in rats with experimental heart failure. Eprosartan was dissolved in a solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate (80 mg/mL) and adjusted to a final concentration sufficient to deliver 5 mg/kg per day for 7 days, according to the specifications of the manufacturer.

Effects of Eprosartan on Daily Sodium Excretion
Two experimental approaches were used. In the first approach (early treatment protocol), osmotic minipumps containing either eprosartan (n=8 experiments) or vehicle (n=6 experiments) were implanted into the peritoneal cavity during the creation of the A-V fistula. Rats with sham operation treated with eprosartan served as a control (n=5). After the operation the animals were transferred into metabolic cages, and daily measurements of urinary sodium excretion were performed for 7 days.

In the second approach (late treatment protocol), a preselected group of rats with decompensated heart failure and avid sodium retention was subjected to eprosartan treatment. In these rats (n=8), daily sodium excretion in the first 6 postoperative days was <100 µmol/24 hours. Previously, we reported that this subgroup develops symptoms of severe congestion and usually succumbs to the condition within 8 to 12 days.6 Thus, on the sixth day after the operation these rats were lightly anesthetized, and an osmotic minipump, loaded with eprosartan, was inserted into their peritoneal cavity through a small incision made in the abdominal wall. The animals were then returned to their metabolic cages, and daily measurements of urinary volume and sodium concentration were obtained for 7 additional days.

Effects of Eprosartan on Cardiac Hypertrophy: Comparison With ACE Inhibition
After the completion of the 7 days of eprosartan treatment, animals from the early and late treatment protocols were killed by decapitation. Their chest was opened and the heart was removed instantaneously, placed on absorbent paper to remove excess of blood, and then weighed to calculate the heart/body weight ratio. Sham-operated control animals (n=6) served as control. To compare the effect of eprosartan to that of ACE inhibition, an additional group of rats with A-V fistula (n=7) was studied. In these rats, the ACE inhibitor enalapril (Merck & Co) was added to the drinking water on the day of operation, at a dose of 100 mg/L, and continued for 7 additional days. In preliminary experiments we found that treatment with this dose for 3 days was sufficient to block the hypertensive and renal vasoconstrictor effects of bolus injections of angiotensin I, in a dose range of 100 to 300 ng/kg (data not shown).

Chemical Analysis
Concentrations of inulin in plasma and in the urine were measured by the anthrone method.34 Sodium concentration in plasma and urine was determined by flame photometry (model IL 943, Instrumentation Laboratories).

Statistical Analysis
One-way ANOVA was used for group comparisons and repeated-measures ANOVA for comparison of treatment values with baseline values in each group. The Tukey or Dunnett test was used for post-ANOVA evaluation, as appropriate. For comparison of the graphs representing control and experimental groups, 2-way ANOVA was used. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as mean±SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Acute Studies
Dose-Response Relationships of Eprosartan on MAP and RBF
Table 1Down summarizes the data on the effects of incremental doses of eprosartan on MAP and RBF in rats with A-V fistula. As shown, eprosartan produced a dose-related decrease in MAP and an increase in RBF when administered at doses of 0.3 and 1.0 mg/kg. In the higher dose of 3.0 mg/kg, the drug induced a marked hypotensive response and no increase in RBF. On the basis of these observations, the dose of 1.0 mg/kg was chosen in the protocols of the acute studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Dose-Related Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Hemodynamics and MAP in Rats With CHF

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal and Intrarenal Hemodynamics
Figures 1Down and 2Down summarize the data on the acute effects of eprosartan on renal hemodynamics and intrarenal distribution of blood flow in rats with CHF and control animals. Rats with CHF had a significantly lower MAP than control animals (CHF: 111±7 mm Hg; control: 128±3 mm Hg; P<0.05), and infusion of eprosartan resulted in a further reduction in MAP in both groups. Baseline RBF was lower in CHF rats (1.4±0.1 mL/min per 100 g body wt) than in controls (2.8±0.2 mL/min per 100 g body wt; P<0.001). Likewise, RVR was higher in rats with CHF than in controls (CHF: 26.6±2.1 resistance units; control: 15.8±0.7 resistance units; P<0.001). Administration of the drug resulted in a significant increase in RBF in both control rats (from 2.8 to 3.6 mL/min per 100 g body wt; P<0.05) and rats with CHF (from 1.4 to 1.9 mL/min per 100 g body wt; P<0.01). Moreover, when calculated as percent change from baseline value, the increase in RBF in rats with CHF was of a significantly higher magnitude and of longer duration than that observed in control animals (Figure 1Down). Likewise, eprosartan caused a more prominent and sustained reduction in RVR in rats with CHF than in control animals (Figure 1Down, bottom panel). Thus, the effects of the Ang II receptor antagonist on renal hemodynamics were more pronounced and more sustained in rats with CHF and occurred despite a further decrease in MAP ({approx}-12%) after administration of the drug.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of eprosartan infusion on MAP, RBF, and calculated RVR in control group ({blacksquare}) and CHF rats ({bullet}). Hatched area represents the duration of the drug administration. The lines representing control and CHF groups were significantly different (by 2-way ANOVA) for each parameter measured. *Statistically significant compared with baseline value in the same group.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of eprosartan on renal CBF (top) and MBF (bottom) in control group ({blacksquare}) and in CHF rats ({bullet}). Data are expressed as percent change from baseline value. *Statistically significant compared with baseline value in the same group.

The beneficial effects of eprosartan on RBF and RVR are also reflected in Figure 2Up, which depicts the alterations in the intrarenal distribution of blood flow as evaluated by laser-Doppler flowmetry. As shown, eprosartan caused a marked and sustained increase in cortical perfusion ({approx}+28%, peak response) in rats with CHF compared with a significantly lower ({approx}+17%) and more transient response observed in sham-operated controls (Figure 2Up, top panel). In contrast, in the medulla the drug produced similar changes in blood perfusion in both groups, which were not statistically different from baseline values (Figure 2Up, bottom panel). These findings suggest that Ang II blockade caused a preferential increase in CBF and improved cortical perfusion in rats with heart failure.

Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Clearance Parameters
The acute effects of eprosartan on GFR and sodium excretion are summarized in Table 2Down. As reported previously,6 27 baseline GFR was significantly lower in rats with CHF than in control animals (CHF: 0.88±0.13 mL/min; control: 1.79±0.17 mL/min; P<0.05). After eprosartan, GFR increased significantly in CHF rats (from 0.88±0.13 to 1.62±0.27 mL/min; P<0.05) but not in control rats (Table 2Down). Likewise, baseline value of fractional sodium excretion was significantly reduced in rats with CHF (control: 0.63±0.21%; CHF: 0.16±0.06%; P<0.05). Administration of eprosartan resulted in a significant increase in sodium excretion in control animals but not in rats with CHF (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effects of Eprosartan on Renal Clearance Parameters in Control and CHF Rats

Chronic Studies
Effects of Eprosartan on Daily Sodium Excretion
Figure 3ADown summarizes the data on the effects of chronic administration of eprosartan on urinary sodium excretion in control and CHF rats in which an osmotic minipump, containing either the drug or vehicle, was inserted intraperitoneally concomitantly with the operation (early treatment protocol). Average daily sodium excretion in all groups before the operation was 1540±54 µmol/24 h (on the basis of 45 measurements in 15 rats during 3 consecutive days before the operation). Rats with A-V fistula displayed a sustained decrease in urinary sodium excretion (days 1 through 6) compared with only a transient decrease in the first 2 postoperative days in control animals. Rats with A-V fistula in which eprosartan was administered through an osmotic minipump displayed a significantly earlier natriuretic response compared with CHF rats treated with the vehicle only (Figure 3ADown). This early "recovery" resulted in daily sodium excretion values, on days 4 through 7, that were not different from those observed in the sham-operated control group treated with the drug.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. A, Effects of chronic eprosartan (Epro) administration on daily urinary sodium excretion in rats with experimental heart failure. Hatched area represents the averaged daily sodium excretion in the last 3 days before operation (baseline period). Lines representing the eprosartan-treated and vehicle-treated groups of rats with A-V fistula are significantly different (by 2-way ANOVA). B, Effect of chronic administration of eprosartan on urinary sodium excretion in rats with decompensated heart failure. Data are based on 7 experiments. Eprosartan-loaded minipumps were inserted intraperitoneally on day 6 after creation of the A-V fistula. *Statistically different compared with pretreatment value.

Figure 3BUp depicts the effects of the drug on urinary sodium excretion in a preselected group of rats with decompensated CHF that displayed avid sodium retention (daily urinary sodium excretion <100 µmol/24 h) in the first week after the operation.6 Administration of eprosartan was started on the sixth postoperative day and continued for an additional week (late treatment protocol). As shown, eprosartan treatment resulted in a progressive increase in urinary sodium excretion, which reached its peak effect on the fifth day of drug administration and remained significantly elevated above pretreatment level throughout the experiment (Figure 3BUp).

Effects of Eprosartan on Cardiac Hypertrophy: Comparison With ACE Inhibition
Figure 4Down shows the effects of treatment with eprosartan (early and late treatment protocols) and with the ACE inhibitor enalapril on the heart/body weight ratio in rats with experimental CHF. The heart/body weight ratio, an index of cardiac hypertrophy, increased from 0.34±0.01% in control rats to 0.49±0.03% in rats with CHF (P<0.001). Interestingly, early treatment with eprosartan was highly beneficial in preventing the increase in heart/body weight ratio in rats with CHF (0.36±0.01%; P=NS compared with control animals). In contrast, early treatment with enalapril did not prevent the increase in heart/body weight ratio (0.47±0.03%; P=NS compared with CHF rats without any treatment). Similarly, in rats with CHF in which eprosartan was started 1 week after the A-V fistula operation (late treatment group in Figure 4Down), the drug did not decrease heart/body weight ratio (0.55±0.01%). Thus, early but not late administration of eprosartan was more effective than ACE inhibition in attenuating the volume overload induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats with A-V fistula.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Changes in the heart/body weight ratio (expressed as percentage), an index of cardiac hypertrophy, in the various experimental groups. The mean (horizontal line) and individual values are shown in each experimental group. See text for further details. Epro indicates eprosartan.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study demonstrated that eprosartan, a highly specific, nonpeptide AT1 receptor antagonist, caused a remarkable improvement in renal function and attenuated the development of cardiac hypertrophy in rats with experimental heart failure. Thus, acute administration of the antagonist resulted in a sustained reduction in RVR associated with a marked increase in total RBF and in renal cortical perfusion. These beneficial actions of eprosartan on renal hemodynamics in rats with CHF were associated with a significant increase in GFR. Moreover, when administered on a chronic basis, eprosartan induced an impressive natriuretic response in rats with decompensated CHF and avid sodium retention. Finally, early treatment with eprosartan was highly effective in preventing the development of cardiac hypertrophy, exceeding that produced by ACE inhibition, in this experimental model of cardiac failure.

The findings of the present study are therefore important in 2 main aspects. First, they lend further support to the concept that Ang II, acting through its AT1 receptor subtype, plays a major role in the pathogenesis of renal dysfunction and cardiac hypertrophy in heart failure. Second, they provide evidence that direct blockade of the AT1 receptor may be used as an effective approach to counteract the detrimental actions of Ang II on the kidney and cardiac muscle in heart failure. Thus, this newly developed group of pharmacological blockers may find increasing use in the future as an additional or alternative therapy to the well-characterized ACE inhibitors.

The experimental model used in the present study, rats with A-V fistula, is characterized by several features that closely mimic the pathophysiological consequences of CHF in patients. In particular, this model displays the characteristic neurohumoral activation of heart failure, with increased sympathetic activity, activation of the RAAS, high circulating levels of the atrial natriuretic peptide, and rapid development of severe eccentric cardiac hypertrophy due to volume overload.6 27 30 32 The renal manifestations in this model include marked decrease in RBF with a selective decline in cortical perfusion, decreased GFR, and a tendency to avid retention of salt and water by the kidney that may lead to extracellular volume expansion and edema formation.6 28 Previous studies in these rats, as well as in dogs with A-V fistula, have suggested that the alterations in renal handling of sodium in this model are highly dependent on the increased activity of the RAAS.6 32 35 Indeed, activation of the RAAS is considered to play a major role in the pathogenesis of the deranged renal hemodynamics and augmented tubular sodium reabsorption in CHF.1 8 35 Ang II contributes significantly to the decrease in renal perfusion and the diminished GFR through its vasoconstrictor effect on the efferent and afferent arterioles as well as by promoting mesangial contraction.8 Although Ang II may be important in maintaining GFR in the initial stages of heart failure,4 in more advanced states GFR tends to decrease as a result of the Ang II–mediated intense afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and diminished ultrafiltration coefficient.7 8 The findings of the present study demonstrate that removal of the influence of Ang II by eprosartan resulted in a marked improvement in renal hemodynamics and GFR in rats with CHF. Furthermore, as shown by the measurements of renal regional blood flow, eprosartan preferentially increased renal cortical perfusion. This restoration of blood flow to the renal cortex, an area mostly involved in filtration, could be an additional mechanism by which eprosartan caused the elevation in GFR. However, despite this impressive increase in RBF and GFR, acute administration of eprosartan was not associated with a comparable increase in sodium excretion. This could be related to the concomitant decrease in MAP caused by the drug, which apparently counteracted its potential natriuretic action. Indeed, when eprosartan was administered for 7 days through osmotic minipumps, the natriuretic properties of the drug became manifest. The ability of eprosartan to increase sodium excretion in rats with CHF when administered on a chronic basis is apparently due to a combination of several potential mechanisms. These include the favorable action of the drug on renal hemodynamics and GFR, its ability to antagonize the direct action of Ang II on tubular sodium reabsorption, and lastly, the potential effect of the drug on aldosterone secretion. Of interest was the observation that the natriuresis evoked by eprosartan in rats with decompensated CHF became significantly elevated over pretreatment value only on day 4 of treatment and later. Taken together with the lack of natriuretic action in the acute studies, despite the prominent hemodynamic effect of the drug, these findings might suggest that the natriuretic effect of the drug is not related to its action on renal hemodynamics. Rather, the chronic effects of eprosartan could be mediated mainly by antagonizing the action of Ang II on tubular sodium reabsorption or its effect on aldosterone release. However, since plasma levels of the drug were not measured in the present study, we cannot rule out the possibility that this delayed natriuretic response may be related to other factors, eg, delivery of the drug by osmotic minipumps.

Initial reports alluding to the therapeutic benefits of Ang II antagonists in heart failure have dealt primarily with their cardiovascular effects rather than the kidney. Only a few studies have provided data on the renal effects of this class of drugs in this cardiovascular disorder.22 23 36 In a model of ovine heart failure, acute administration of losartan was able to maintain GFR and urinary sodium excretion despite a fall in renal perfusion pressure.22 Likewise, in dogs with CHF due to rapid atrial pacing, chronic administration of TVC-116, a biphenyl tetrazole Ang II antagonist, prevented the decrease in GFR, renal plasma flow, and sodium excretion.36 Also, acute administration of losartan was found to improve the natriuretic response to atrial natriuretic peptide in rats with A-V fistula.23 The present study indicates that eprosartan is another Ang II antagonist that is highly effective in preserving renal function in heart failure. Taken together with the previous data, our findings suggest that the favorable effects of these agents on the cardiovascular system in CHF may be mediated, in part, by improving renal function and promoting salt and water excretion, thus unloading the failing myocardium.

Finally, of interest and of no less importance was the observation on the effects of eprosartan on cardiac hypertrophy in experimental heart failure. Our data demonstrate that early treatment with the drug significantly attenuated and actually prevented the increase in cardiac muscle mass in this experimental model of CHF. Previous studies have suggested that in addition to the mechanical stress exerted on the myocardium as a result of Ang II–mediated increased afterload, activation of the local (intracardiac) RAAS may play a crucial role in inducing cardiac hypertrophy and remodeling in CHF.37 38 This growth activity is thought to involve upregulation of cardiac ACE and is the result of Ang II–induced expression of growth factors in myocytes as well as increased formation of connective tissue by fibroblasts and mesenchymal cells. Indeed, rats with A-V fistula are characterized by increased myocardial expression of renin mRNA and ACE mRNA in proportion to the severity of cardiac dysfunction.39 Moreover, ACE inhibitors have been found to be effective in retarding left ventricular hypertrophy in rats with CHF induced by coronary ligation10 and in preventing ventricular enlargement in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction.12

Initial studies with the Ang II antagonist losartan indicated that early treatment with the drug reduced cardiac hypertrophy and inhibited myocardial collagen deposition after myocardial infarction in rats.40 Interestingly, Ruzicka et al30 reported that only the Ang II antagonist losartan, but not the ACE inhibitor enalapril, was able to effectively reduce the development of overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in a model similar to that used in the present study. This discrepancy occurred despite a comparable systemic hemodynamic effect of both drugs and was attributed to increased cardiac Ang II generation by pathways resistant to ACE inhibition.30 The findings of the present study lend further support to the latter report by demonstrating the higher efficacy of eprosartan, compared with ACE inhibition, in limiting the progress of cardiac hypertrophy in response to volume overload. Our findings also indicate that delayed administration of eprosartan, ie, after cardiac enlargement became established, did not result in regression of the hypertrophic response to volume overload. However, this interpretation should be taken with caution since drug administration in the chronic protocols lasted for no more than a week, a period that might have been too short to note regression of preformed remodeling of the cardiac muscle. Certainly, a more prolonged treatment is necessary before the potential clinical implications of this finding can be assessed.

In summary, the present study demonstrates that the nonpeptide AT1 receptor antagonist eprosartan is highly effective in improving renal hemodynamics, promoting sodium excretion, and attenuating cardiac hypertrophy in rats with experimental heart failure induced by A-V fistula. Selective blockade of the AT1 receptor may therefore be viewed as an additional important and efficient therapy in CHF.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by a grant from the Israel Ministry of Health and awards from the Israel Ministry of Absorption in Science and from SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals. The authors acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Eva Shuranyi and Aviva Kaballa and the secretarial assistance of Ruth Singer.

Received January 22, 1998; first decision February 10, 1998; accepted May 7, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Dzau VJ. Renal and circulatory mechanisms in congestive heart failure. Kidney Int. 1987;31:1402–1415.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Watkins L Jr, Burton JA, Haber E, Cant JR, Smith FW, Barger AC. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in congestive failure in conscious dogs. J Clin Invest. 1976;57:1606–1617.
  3. Dzau VJ, Colucci WS, Hollenberg NK, Williams RE. Relation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system to clinical state in congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1981;63:645–651.[Free Full Text]
  4. Packer M. Adaptive and maladaptive actions of angiotensin II in patients with severe congestive heart failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1987;10:66–73.
  5. Katz AM. Angiotensin II: hemodynamic regulator or growth factor? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1990;22:739–747.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Winaver J, Hoffman A, Burnett JC Jr, Haramati A. Hormonal determinants of sodium excretion in rats with experimental high-output heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1988;254:R776–R784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ichikawa I, Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Hostetter TH, Brenner BM. Role of angiotensin II in the altered renal function of congestive heart failure. Circ Res. 1984;55:669–675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ichikawa I, Yoshioka T, Fogo A, Kon V. Role of angiotensin II in altered glomerular hemodynamics in congestive heart failure. Kidney Int. 1990;38:S-123–S-126.
  9. Hall JE, Brands MW. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone systems: renal mechanisms and circulatory homeostasis. In: Seldin DW, Giebisch G, eds. The Kidney: Physiology and Pathophysiology. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1992:1455–1504.
  10. Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Hemodynamic benefits and prolonged survival with long-term captopril therapy in rats with myocardial infarction and heart failure. Circulation. 1987;75(suppl I):I-149–I-155.
  11. The CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure: results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987;316:1429–1435.[Abstract]
  12. Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ Jr, Cuddy TE, Davis BR, Geltman EM, Goldman S, Flaker GC, Klein M, Lamas GA, Packer M, Rouleau J, Rouleau JL, Rutherford J, Werthheimer JH, Hawkins CM. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction: results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669–677.[Abstract]
  13. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:685–691.[Abstract]
  14. Liu YH, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Nass O, Sabbah HN, Peterson E, Carretero OA. Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in rats with heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:1926–1935.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Farhy RD, Carretero OA, Ho KL, Scicli AG. Role of kinins and nitric oxide in the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on neointima formation. Circ Res. 1993;72:1202–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Goodfriend TL, Elliott ME, Catt KJ. Angiotensin receptors and their antagonists. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1649–1654.[Free Full Text]
  17. Bauer JH, Reams GP. The angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists: a new class of antihypertensive drugs. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1361–1368.[Abstract]
  18. Sweet CS, Rucinska EJ. Losartan in heart failure: preclinical experiences and initial clinical outcomes. Eur Heart J. 1994;15:139–144.
  19. Awan NA, Mason DT. Direct selective blockade of the vascular angiotensin II receptors in therapy for hypertension and severe congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 1996;131:177–185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Gottlieb SS, Dickstein K, Fleck E, Kostis J, Levine TB, LeJemtel T, DeKock M. Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of the angiotensin II antagonist losartan in patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1993;88:1602–1609.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Crozier I, Ikram H, Awan NA, Cleland J, Stephen N, Dickstein K, Frey M, Young J, Klinger G, Makris L, Rucinska E. Losartan in heart failure: hemodynamic effects and tolerability. Circulation. 1995;91:691–697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Fitzpatrick MA, Rademaker MT, Charles CJ, Yandle TG, Espiner EA, Ikram H. Angiotensin II receptor antagonism in ovine heart failure: acute hemodynamic, hormonal, and renal effects. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H250–H256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Abassi ZA, Kelly G, Golomb E, Klein H, Keiser HR. Losartan improves the natriuretic response to ANF in rats with high-output heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;268:224–268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Spinale FG, de Gasparo M, Whitebread S, Hebbar L, Clair MJ, Melton M, Krombach SR, Mukherjee R, Iannini JP, O SJ. Modulation of the renin-angiotensin pathway through enzyme inhibition and specific receptor blockade in pacing-induced heart failure, I: effects on left ventricular performance and neurohormonal systems.
  25. Price DA, De'Oliveira JM, Fisher NDL, Hollenberg NK. Renal hemodynamic response to an angiotensin II antagonist, eprosartan, in healthy men. Hypertension. 1997;30:240–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Brooks DP, Fredrickson TA, Weinstock J, Ruffolo RR Jr, Edwards RM, Gellai M. Antihypertensive activity of the non-peptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, SK&F 108566, in rats and dogs. Arch Pharmacol. 1992;345:673–678.
  27. Hoffman A, Burnett JC Jr, Haramati A, Winaver J. Effects of atrial natriuretic factor in rats with experimental high-output heart failure. Kidney Int. 1988;33:656–661.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Abassi ZA, Gurbanov K, Mulroney SE, Potlog C, Opgenorth TJ, Hoffman A, Haramati A, Winaver J. Impaired nitric oxide–mediated renal vasodilation in rats with experimental heart failure: role of angiotensin II. Circulation.. 1997;96:3655–3664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Calderone A, Takahashi N, Izzo NJ, Thaik CM, Colucci WS. Pressure- and volume-induced left ventricular hypertrophies are associated with distinct myocyte phenotypes and differential induction of peptide growth factor mRNAs. Circulation. 1995;92:2385–2390.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ruzicka M, Yuan B, Harmsen E, Leenen FHH. The renin-angiotensin system and volume overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats. Circulation. 1992;87:921–930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Stumpe KU, Solle H, Klein H, Kruck F. Mechanism of sodium and water retention in rats with experimental heart failure. Kidney Int. 1973;4:309–317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Abassi Z, Haramati A, Hoffman A, Burnett JC Jr, Winaver J. Effect of converting-enzyme inhibition on renal response to ANF in rats with experimental heart failure. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:R84–R89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Gurbanov K, Rubinstein I, Hoffman A, Abassi Z, Better OS, Winaver J. Differential regulation of renal regional blood flow by endothelin-1. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:F1166–F1172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Fuhr J, Kaczmarczyk J, Kruttgen CD. Eine einfache colorimetrische Methode zur Inulinbestimmung fur Nierencleartanceuntersuchungen bei Stowechselgesunden und Diabetikern. Klin Wochenschr. 1955;33:729–730.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Villarreal D, Freeman RH. ANF and the renin-angiotensin system in the regulation of sodium balance: longitudinal studies in experimental heart failure. J Lab Clin Med. 1991;118:515–522.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Maeda Y, Wada A, Tsutamoto T, Fukai D, Kinoshita M. Chronic effects of ANG II antagonist in heart failure: improvement of cGMP generation from ANP. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H2139–H2145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Dzau VJ. Tissue renin-angiotensin system in myocardial hypertrophy and failure. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:937–942.[Abstract]
  38. Weber KT. Extracellular matrix remodeling in heart failure: a role for de novo angiotensin II generation. Circulation. 1997;96:4065–4082.[Free Full Text]
  39. Pieruzzi F, Abassi Z, Keiser HR. Expression of renin-angiotensin system components in the heart, kidneys and lungs of rats with experimental heart failure. Circulation. 1995;92:3105–3112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Smits JFM. Angiotensin II receptor blockade after myocardial infarct in rats: effects on hemodynamics, myocardial DNA synthesis, and interstitial collagen content. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;20:772–778.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
B. Bishara, H. Shiekh, T. Karram, I. Rubinstein, Z. S. Azzam, N. Abu-Saleh, S. Nitecki, J. Winaver, A. Hoffman, and Z. A. Abassi
Effects of Novel Vasopressin Receptor Antagonists on Renal Function and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats with Experimental Congestive Heart Failure
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2008; 326(2): 414 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
Z. S. Azzam, Y. Adir, L. Welch, J. Chen, J. Winaver, P. Factor, N. Krivoy, A. Hoffman, J. I. Sznajder, and Z. Abassi
Alveolar fluid reabsorption is increased in rats with compensated heart failure
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): L1094 - L1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
E. Ovcharenko, Z. Abassi, I. Rubinstein, A. Kaballa, A. Hoffman, and J. Winaver
Renal effects of human urotensin-II in rats with experimental congestive heart failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1205 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Winaver, E. Ovcharenko, I. Rubinstein, K. Gurbanov, P. Pollesello, B. Bishara, A. Hoffman, and Z. Abassi
Involvement of Rho kinase pathway in the mechanism of renal vasoconstriction and cardiac hypertrophy in rats with experimental heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H2007 - H2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Karram, A. Abbasi, S. Keidar, E. Golomb, I. Hochberg, J. Winaver, A. Hoffman, and Z. Abassi
Effects of spironolactone and eprosartan on cardiac remodeling and angiotensin-converting enzyme isoforms in rats with experimental heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): H1351 - H1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. A. Abassi, A. Yahia, S. Zeid, T. Karram, E. Golomb, J. Winaver, and A. Hoffman
Cardiac and renal effects of omapatrilat, a vasopeptidase inhibitor, in rats with experimental congestive heart failure
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H722 - H728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
G. M. Bialik, Z. A. Abassi, I. Hammel, J. Winaver, and D. Lewinson
Evaluation of Atrial Natriuretic Peptide and Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Atrial Granules of Rats with Experimental Congestive Heart Failure
J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2001; 49(10): 1293 - 1300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
Z. A. Abassi, S. Brodsky, T. Karram, I. Dobkin, J. Winaver, and A. Hoffman
Temporal changes in natriuretic and antinatriuretic systems after closure of a large arteriovenous fistula
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2001; 51(3): 567 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
H. Shigematsu, Y. Hirooka, K. Eshima, M. Shihara, T. Tagawa, and A. Takeshita
Endogenous angiotensin II in the NTS contributes to sympathetic activation in rats with aortocaval shunt
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): R1665 - R1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
F. C. Barone, R. W. Coatney, S. Chandra, S. K. Sarkar, A. H. Nelson, L. C. Contino, D. P. Brooks, W. G. Campbell Jr., E. H. Ohlstein, and R. N. Willette
Eprosartan reduces cardiac hypertrophy, protects heart and kidney, and prevents early mortality in severely hypertensive stroke-prone rats
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2001; 50(3): 525 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. M. Behr, X. Wang, N. Aiyar, R. W. Coatney, X. Li, P. Koster, C. E. Angermann, E. Ohlstein, G. Z. Feuerstein, and J. Winaver
Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 is Upregulated in Rats With Volume-Overload Congestive Heart Failure
Circulation, September 12, 2000; 102(11): 1315 - 1322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Tamura, S. Said, J. Harris, W. Lu, and A. M. Gerdes
Reverse Remodeling of Cardiac Myocyte Hypertrophy in Hypertension and Failure by Targeting of the Renin-Angiotensin System
Circulation, July 11, 2000; 102(2): 253 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brodsky, S.
Right arrow Articles by Winaver, J.
Right arrow