Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Hypertension
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Hypertension. 1998;32:849-855

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oriji, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keiser, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oriji, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keiser, H. R.

(Hypertension. 1998;32:849-855.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Scientific Contributions

Role of Nitric Oxide in Cyclosporine A–Induced Hypertension

Gibson K. Oriji; ; Harry R. Keiser

From the Hypertension-Endocrine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Correspondence to Dr Gibson K. Oriji, Hypertension-Endocrine Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr, MSC 1754, Bldg 10, Room 8C103, Bethesda, MD 20892-1754.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Cyclosporine A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive agent that also causes hypertension. The effect of CsA on vascular responses was determined in Sprague-Dawley rats and isolated rat aortic rings. Male rats weighing 250 to 300 g were given either CsA (25 mg · kg-1 · d-1) in olive oil or vehicle by intraperitoneal injection for 7 days. CsA administration produced a 42% increase (P<0.001) in mean arterial pressure (MAP) that reached a plateau after 3 days. Conversely, the levels of both nitrate/nitrite, metabolites of nitric oxide (NO), and cGMP, which mediates NO action, decreased by 50% (P<0.001) and 35% (P<0.001), respectively, in the urine. Thoracic aortic rings from rats treated with CsA and precontracted with endothelin (10-9 mol/L) showed a 35% increase (P<0.001) in tension, whereas endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by acetylcholine (ACh, 10-9 mol/L) was inhibited 65% (P<0.001) compared with that in untreated rats. This response was similar to that of endothelium-denuded aortic rings from untreated rats in which ACh-induced relaxation was completely abolished (P<0.001), but relaxation induced by S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP, 10-8 mol/L) was unaffected (P<0.001). ACh-induced formation of both nitrate/nitrite and cGMP by both denuded and CsA-treated aortic rings was inhibited 95% (P<0.001) and 65% (P<0.001), respectively, compared with intact aortic rings. The effects of CsA were reversed both in vivo and in vitro by pretreatment with L-arginine (10 mg · kg-1 · d-1 IP), the precursor of NO. There were no changes in MAP and tension in rats treated with L-arginine alone. In summary, CsA inhibits endothelial NO activity, with resulting increases in MAP and tension, and this inhibition can be overcome by parenteral administration of L-arginine.


Key Words: cyclosporine • arginine • endothelin • acetylcholine • nitrates • rats • aortic rings


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cyclosporine A (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressive agent that is associated with the development of arterial hypertension.1 2 Numerous articles have reported data that support many possible causes for the hypertension, but none have really clarified the mechanism.3 As a result, effective treatment of CsA-induced hypertension remains empiric.

Therefore, this study aimed to answer the following questions: (1) What vasoactive system abnormalities, if any, accompany CsA-induced hypertension in the whole animal? (2) Are similar abnormalities found in isolated aortic rings from CsA-treated animals? (3) Does direct measurement of the vasoactive substance(s) produced by the rings provide evidence of the abnormality? (4) Can CsA toxicity be overcome by administration of an agent that should remedy the abnormality? By performing complementary studies in the whole animal, isolated aortic rings, and the fluid that bathed those rings, we found that CsA toxicity is associated with an inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) activity that can be overcome by pretreatment with L-arginine (L-Arg).


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250 to 300 g were housed in individual metabolic cages with free access to water and rat chow (batch 5001 from Purina Mills Inc).

Effects of CsA, L-Arg, Bosentan, and BQ-123 on Blood Pressure
After 3 days of acclimatization, the rats were divided randomly into 8 groups and treated with (1) CsA (25 mg/kg) in 1 mL of olive oil; (2) olive oil (1 mL); (3) L-Arg (10 mg/kg); (4) bosentan (25 mg/kg), an endothelin (ET)A/B receptor antagonist; (5) BQ-123 (0.1 mg/kg), an ETA receptor antagonist; (6) bosentan (25 mg/kg) plus CsA (25 mg/kg); (7) BQ-123 (0.1 mg/kg) plus CsA (25 mg/kg); or (8) L-Arg (10 mg/kg) plus CsA (25 mg/kg); each drug was given via a separate intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days (n=6 for each group). In a preliminary study, we found that daily injections of CsA (25 mg/kg) produced hypertension that was only partially prevented by injections of either BQ-123 (0.1 mg/kg) or bosentan (25 mg/kg), whereas doses of 50 mg/kg bosentan caused progressive toxicity with severe anorexia, weight loss, and death (Figure 2Down). Not all groups of rats were studied at the same time. However, an appropriate control group was always studied simultaneously with every treated group.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects on MAP of CsA (25 mg/kg), BQ-123 (0.1 mg/kg), BQ-123+CsA, bosentan (Bos; 25 mg/kg), bosentan+CsA, or olive oil by intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days. *P<0.001 vs control.

Measurement of Blood Pressure
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured at the same time each day with the tail-cuff method using a model 229 Blood Pressure Amplifier/Pump from IITC Inc.

Collection of Urine
Urine was collected into 0.2 mL of 6N-HCl for the 24-hour period immediately after the last treatment and stored at -70°C until assay for NO, cGMP, and prostacyclin (PGI2) or their metabolites.

Preparation of Aortic Rings
On day 7 of treatment, rats were anesthetized by injection of sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg IP), and the thoracic aorta was removed and prepared as previously described.4 The aortic rings were stimulated every 20 minutes with KCl (50 mmol/L) until reproducible contractions were obtained. All subsequent contractile responses in each vessel were expressed as a percentage of the last contractile response to KCl, and all data are expressed as mean±SEM.

In Vivo Effects of CsA on Tension
Aortic rings were prepared from intact rings from animals given either CsA (n=4) or vehicle (n=6) and from either intact (n=6) or denuded (n=4) rings from untreated rats. Later, rings were prepared from rats given either CsA plus L-Arg or L-Arg alone (n=6 for each). The doses of drugs or vehicle were the same as those listed above. ET (10-9 mol/L) was added, and the rings were allowed to contract for 120 minutes without washing out of the agonist. Another set of rings was prepared as above, either acetylcholine (ACh; 10-9 mol/L) or S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP; 10-8 mol/L) was added 30 minutes after the ET (10-9 mol/L), and the reaction was observed for 90 more minutes without washing out of either agonist.

In Vitro Effects of CsA on Tension
Aortic rings from a group of untreated control rats were used to study the in vitro effects of CsA on tension and the production of nitrate/nitrite (NO2/NO3), cGMP, and 6 keto-PGF1{alpha}. After a 30-minute equilibration period, CsA (10-9 mol/L) was added to the bath, and the aortic ring was allowed to contract for 120 minutes. Bath fluid was harvested 90 minutes after the addition of CsA and stored at -70°C until assay for NO, cGMP, and PGI2 or their metabolites.

Measurement of NO, cGMP, and PGI2
NO was quantified by measurement of its metabolites nitrate/nitrite using Greiss reagent with sodium nitrite as a standard.5 cGMP was assayed via a radioimmunoassay kit (NEX 133, Du Pont). PGI2 was assayed via a radioimmunoassay kit for its metabolite 6 keto-PGF1{alpha} (Kit 515, Amersham).

Statistical Analysis
All data were generated with paired controls. Values are expressed as mean±SEM. Two-way ANOVA was used for comparisons within experiments. A value of P<0.05 was considered significant.

Drugs and Chemicals
CsA (Sandimmune) was a gift from Sandoz Inc (East Hanover, NJ), and bosentan was a gift from Hoffmann La Roche (Basel, Switzerland). Endothelin, BQ-123, ACh, SNAP, and L-Arg were all purchased from Calbiochem Inc.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effects of Daily Intraperitoneal Injection of CsA for 7 Days on MAP
In CsA-treated rats, MAP began to increase on day 1 and increased rapidly through day 3, after which it reached a plateau from which it often increased further on day 7. Basal MAP averaged 120±4 mm Hg. By day 3, MAP had increased to 160±3 mm Hg in CsA-treated rats compared with 126±3 mm Hg in untreated rats (P<0.001) (Figure 1Down). On day 3, MAP in CsA-treated rats was 42% higher than in untreated rats.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects on MAP of CsA (25 mg/kg), L-Arg (10 mg/kg), L-Arg+CsA, or olive oil by intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control.

Effects of Daily Intraperitoneal Injection of BQ-123 or Bosentan on CsA-Induced Hypertension
In preliminary experiments, we sought to determine whether ET was the cause of CsA-induced hypertension. Despite the fact that either 0.1 mg/kg BQ-123 or 25 mg/kg bosentan prevented the hypertension produced by daily injection of 100 ng/kg of ET, those same doses of either BQ-123 or bosentan failed to prevent CsA-induced hypertension (Figure 2Up).

Effects of ET on Either Denuded or Intact Aortic Rings and on Aortic Rings of Rats Treated With Either Olive Oil or CsA
To explore the cause of this hypertension, we performed experiments with aortic rings. The maximum tension developed in response to ET increased rapidly to a plateau by 30 minutes, remained at that level through 70 minutes, and then declined slowly. Maximum tension in rings from CsA-treated rats (206±7%) was not significantly different from that in rings denuded of endothelium from untreated rats (212±6%). These values were on average 35±5% (P<0.001) higher than those in intact rings from either untreated rats (160±6%) or vehicle-treated rats (160±6%) (Figure 3Down).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of ET (10-9 mol/L) on either denuded or intact aortic rings and on aortic rings of rats treated with either olive oil or CsA. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of animals.

Effects of ACh or SNAP on ET-Induced Contractions in Either Denuded or Intact Aortic Rings and on Aortic Rings of Rats Treated With Either Olive Oil or CsA
Thirty minutes after administration of ET, when the ET-induced contraction was maximal, addition of either ACh or SNAP produced a rapid 99.9% (P<0.001) decrease in contractile tension in both intact and vehicle-treated aortic rings, but ACh produced only a minimal effect in either denuded or CsA-treated aortic rings; the effect of SNAP was similar to that seen in intact aortic rings (Figure 4Down). ACh-induced formation of both nitrate/nitrite and cGMP in both denuded and CsA-treated aortic rings was inhibited compared with that in intact aortic rings (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effects of ACh (10-9 mol/L; A) or SNAP (10-8 mol/L; B) on ET-induced contractions in either denuded or intact aortic rings and on aortic rings of rat treated with either olive oil or CsA. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control.

Acute Effects of Either CsA on Tension, Level of Nitrate/Nitrite, cGMP, and 6-Keto PGF1{alpha} in the Organ Bath
When CsA was added acutely to intact aortic rings from untreated rats, tension increased from 0% to 105±1% of KCl tension (P<0.01). Concomitantly, nitrate/nitrite production decreased 83±4% (23±1 versus 3.8±0.01 nmol/L per milliliter), cGMP production decreased 90±1% (12.1±1.2 versus 0.0 pmol/L per milliliter), and PGI2 production increased 40-fold (299±11 versus 3878±65 pg/mL; P<0.01 for each) (Figure 5Down).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Acute effects in aortic rings of either CsA (10-9 mol/L) or olive oil on tension (a) or the level of nitrate/nitrite (b), cGMP (c), or 6-keto PGF1{alpha} (d) in the organ bath. See Methods for details. *P<0.01 vs control for a, b, c, and d.

Because all our data suggested that CsA was inhibiting endothelial NO production, we sought to determine whether added L-Arg could mitigate these effects. In a preliminary experiment, we found that once-daily injections of either 2.5 or 5 mg/kg L-Arg had no effect on CsA-induced hypertension, whereas 10 mg/kg prevented the hypertension and 25 mg/kg reduced blood pressure below the baseline level (data not shown).

Daily injections of L-Arg (10 mg/kg) completely prevented CsA-induced hypertension, whereas daily injections of L-Arg alone had no effect on MAP (Figure 1Up).

Effects of ET on Aortic Rings of Rats Treated With L-Arg and CsA
Daily administration of L-Arg to rats abolished the CsA-induced increases in maximum tension of aortic rings to ET and normalized the response of aortic rings from rats given either L-Arg or vehicle alone (Figure 6Down).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effects of ET (10-9 mol/L) on aortic rings of rats treated with either CsA, L-Arg, L-Arg+CsA, or olive oil by intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control.

Effects of ACh or SNAP on ET-Induced Contractions in Aortic Rings of Rats Treated With L-Arg and CsA
Daily administration of L-Arg to rats restored ACh-induced relaxation in aortic rings from rats treated with CsA to that of rings from rats treated with either L-Arg or vehicle alone (Figure 7Down). SNAP-induced relaxation in aortic rings from rats was unaffected by any of the treatments (Figure 7Down).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Effects of ACh (10-9 mol/L; A) or SNAP (10-8 mol/L; B) on ET-induced contractions of aortic rings of rat treated with either olive oil, CsA, L-Arg, or L-Arg+CsA by intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control.

Effects of Daily Intraperitoneal Injection (7 Days) of CsA, L-Arg, or L-Arg+CsA on Levels of Nitrate/Nitrite and cGMP in Urine
Daily administration of L-Arg to rats prevented CsA-induced decreases of both nitrate/nitrite (Figure 8ADown) and cGMP (Figure 8BDown) in urine, so that levels were not different from those seen in rats given either L-Arg or vehicle alone.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effects of CsA (25 mg/kg), L-Arg (10 mg/kg), L-Arg+CsA, or vehicle by intraperitoneal injection daily for 7 days on levels of nitrate/nitrite (A) and cGMP (B) in urine. See Methods for details. *P<0.001 vs control for A and B.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
There are several important findings of this study: (1) CsA administration to rats increased MAP and concomitantly decreased levels of both nitrate/nitrite and cGMP in urine. (2) ET antagonists were only partially able to block CsA-induced hypertension. (3) ET-induced tension was increased in aortic rings from CsA-treated rats compared with controls and was the same as that of normal rings denuded of endothelium. (4) Aortic rings from CsA-treated rats did not relax in response to ACh. (5) Aortic rings from CsA-treated rats relaxed normally in response to SNAP. (6) All the effects of CsA, both in vivo and in vitro, were reversed by daily intraperitoneal injections of L-Arg.

The finding that CsA administration causes hypertension in both humans and laboratory animals is well established.1 2 A number of possible explanations for the hypertension have been proposed, but none has been definitive. Over the years, data have been presented suggesting that CsA causes time- and dose-dependent endothelial cell injury in vitro,6 that CsA augments the in vitro contractile response to nerve stimulation,7 and that chronic CsA affects both endothelium-dependent vasodilation and vascular smooth muscle contraction depending on the stimulus applied.8

More recently, the possibility that ET is involved in CsA-induced nephrotoxicity and hypertension has gained interest because of the following observations: (1) CsA-induced glomerular hypoperfusion is associated with a remarkable increase in urinary ET9 and in some cases in plasma ET10; (2) CsA stimulates ET production by several types of renal and nonrenal cells11,12; and (3) CsA-related glomerular hypoperfusion/filtration and exaggerated cellular proliferation can be ameliorated by agents that block ET actions, such as anti-ET antibodies13 or selective ET antagonists.14 However, in our own studies in rats, we were unable to prevent CsA-induced hypertension by administration of ET antagonists (ie, either BQ-123 or bosentan).

Our finding that CsA-induced hypertension is accompanied by decreases in urinary NO2/NO3 and cGMP suggested that a vasodilator pathway was suppressed, most likely NO. It is very unlikely that the major effector of CsA-induced hypertension is a product of cyclooxygenase, ie, either the vasodilator PGI2 or a vasoconstrictor such as PGF2{alpha}, because indomethacin did not alter the level of CsA-induced hypertension in preliminary experiments (data not shown). Acute exposure of aortic rings to CsA, increased PGI2 release (Figure 5Up), and L-Arg reversed the CsA-suppressed endothelium-dependent relaxation of ACh, but pretreatment with indomethacin did not reverse the suppressed ACh endothelium-dependent relaxation in aortic rings treated with CsA (data not shown). This observation is similar to the findings of Kim et al.15 L-Arg completely corrected CsA-induced hypertension, therefore suggesting that perturbations in a pathway other than NO were the principal cause of the hypertension.

We chose ET as our model vasoconstrictor because of its prolonged duration of action. We found that CsA-treated aortic rings developed greater tension in response to ET than untreated rings. This effect is not specific to the agonist ET because angiotensin II also produced greater increases in tension in aortic rings from CsA-treated rats than it did in rings from controls (data not shown). Similar findings have been reported by a number of authors using rat thoracic aorta or tail artery and various agonists.15 16 17 18 We found that the increased tension was the same as that developed in normal rings denuded of endothelium. This suggested that chronic CsA administration impaired the vasodilating action of the endothelium. To test this hypothesis, we used ACh, an endothelium-dependent vasodilator. CsA prevented the vasodilator response to ACh to the same degree that denuding a normal aortic ring of endothelium abolishes ACh-induced vasodilation. To extend this observation on endothelial dysfunction, we also used SNAP, an NO donor, that causes endothelium-independent relaxation of rat aortic rings.19 20 CsA did not suppress the vasodilator response to SNAP. Our finding that CsA impairs the vasodilator response of rat aortic rings agrees with the findings of many studies.8 18 21 22

Some investigators have reported findings similar to our own in narrowly defined aspects of the problem, but they have not integrated them into a comprehensive explanation of CsA-induced hypertension; for example, Gallego et al23 showed that chronically administered CsA-induced endothelial dysfunction in rings of rat femoral artery and a decrease in ACh-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation, which was corrected by incubation of the rat arteries with L-Arg,23 results that were similar to our findings. Where we differ is that while Gallego et al concentrated on Ca2+ uptake, we showed that NO2/NO3, surrogates for NO production and cGMP, which mediates NO action, were decreased in both urine and aortic rings of animals treated with CsA and that chronic L-Arg administration reversed both in vivo and in vitro effects of CsA. Bloom et al24 showed that acutely administered CsA decreased NO metabolism in isolated perfused hydronephrotic rat kidneys. Khalil et al25 reported that injection of CsA directly into the coronary arteries of dogs caused vasoconstriction through "myogenic and endothelium-dependent mechanisms." Sudhir et al26 reported that acute injection of CsA "impairs release of endothelium-derived relaxing factors in epicardial and resistance coronary arteries" of dogs. Richards et al27 showed that incubation with CsA in human subcutaneous resistance vessels inhibited endothelium-dependent relaxation, as assessed by the ACh response. Marumo et al28 reported that acutely administered CsA inhibits NO synthase induction in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Chan and coworkers29 suggested that CsA-induced vascular dysfunction is due to direct vasoconstriction, while Galle et al30 suggested that an interaction between CsA and oxidized lipoprotein was necessary. Amore et al31 reported that with chronically administered CsA, increased NO synthase activity and induced nephrotoxicity were prevented by L-Arg administration. To highlight the continuing controversy, O'Neil et al32 reported that NO response was preserved in the coronary arteries of patients treated with cyclosporin; Massoudy et al33 reported that concentrations of NO measured amperometrically in coronary effluent are well preserved in CsA-treated heart after ischemia. Lopez-Ongil et al34 showed that NO synthesis is moderately enhanced in endothelial cells in culture exposed to CsA for 24 hours, and Stroes et al35 reported that acute infusion of CsA into human forearm vessels increased NO activity, but their supporting molecular biological data were from isolated human umbilical vein cells exposed to CsA for only 2 hours. Our study integrates data from chronically treated whole animals, their isolated aortic rings, and the vasoactive substances the rings produce.

What are the acute effects of CsA? We found that a single exposure to CsA significantly increased tension and PGI2 production while appearance of NO metabolites and cGMP were nearly abolished. CsA did not suppress endothelium-independent relaxation. This implied that CsA does not seriously damage the endothelium or block the production of all vasoactive substances; rather, it appears to interfere specifically with the NO pathway.

There are at least 3 possible explanations for the reduced vasodilator response to ACh in CsA-treated rats: (1) an abnormality of ACh receptor/signal transduction, (2) an abnormality in NO formation, or (3) NO degradation. The first hypothesis seems improbable since administration of L-Arg restored both ACh-induced vasodilation and the activity of NO. The second and third hypotheses that CsA may induce an abnormality in NO formation or degradation, respectively, seem much more likely. Such an abnormality or degradation could occur at any one of the steps in the pathway. At present, it is difficult to assess directly many of these steps in vivo. Therefore, since NO can be synthesized from L-Arg by endothelial cells in culture,36 we used L-Arg, a substrate for NO, in this study.

L-Arg administration completely prevented the hypertension in CsA-treated rats and normalized the urinary excretion of both NO2/NO3 and cGMP. L-Arg completely normalized the excessive tension in response to ET that occurred in CsA-treated rats and it restored completely the vasodilatory response to ACh. Both Gallego et al,23 who used rat femoral artery strips, and Kim et al,15 who used rat thoracic aortic rings, found only partial restoration of ACh-induced vasodilation after preincubation of the aortic rings of CsA-treated rats with L-Arg. Both Gallego et al23 and Kim et al15 incubated the aortic rings with L-Arg and did not study the effects of L-Arg on MAP, whereas we administered L-Arg by intraperitoneal injection in the whole animal and studied changes in both MAP and tension. The reasons for the differences between their results and ours are unclear, but they may relate to differences in dosage or experimental design. In any case, we found that all the effects of CsA were reversed completely, both in vivo and in vitro, by treatment with L-Arg.

The finding that L-Arg administration can correct the hypertension and vascular toxicity of CsA administration suggests possible therapy for patients who must take CsA as an immunosuppressive agent. It also suggests further experiments to define the precise mechanism by which CsA impairs the NO pathway.


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors wish to thank John Tate, Shalese Madison, and Erika Felix for their excellent technical assistance and Carol Smith for typing the references.

Received June 19, 1998; first decision July 6, 1998; accepted July 17, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hamilton DV, Carmichael DJS, Evans DB, Calne RY. Hypertension in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporin A and corticosteroids and azathioprine. Transplant Proc. 1982;14:597–600.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Thompson ME, Shapiro AP, Johnson AM, Reeves R, Itzicoff S, Ginchezeau E, Hardesly RL, Griffith BL, Bahnson HT, McDonald R. New onset of hypertension following cardiac transplantation: preliminary report and analysis. Transplant Proc. 1983;15(suppl 1):2573–2577.

3. Conger JD, Kim GE, Robinette JB. Effects of ANG II, ETA, and TxA2 receptor antagonists on cyclosporin A renal vasoconstriction. Am J Physiol. 1994;267(3 pt 2):F443–F449.

4. Oriji GK, Keiser HR. Action of protein kinase C in endothelin-induced contractions in rat aortic rings. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(1 pt 1):C398–C404.

5. Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishonok JS, Tannenbaum SR. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite and [15N] nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem Pharmacol. 1982;126:131–138.

6. Zoja C, Furci L, Ghilardi G, Zilio P, Benigni A, Remuzzi G. Cyclosporine-induced endothelial cell injury. Lab Invest. 1986;55:455–462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Golub MS, Lustig S, Berger ME, Lee DB. Altered vascular responses in cyclosporin-treated rats. Transplantation. 1989;48:116–118.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Auch-Schwelk W, Bossaller C, Götze S, Thelen J, Fleck E. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle function after chronic treatment with cyclosporine A. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1993;21:435–440.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Perico N, Ruggenenti P, Gaspari F, Mosconi L, Benigni A, Amuchastegui CS, Gasparini F, Remuzzi G. Daily renal hypoperfusion induced by cyclosporine in patients with renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1992;54:56–60.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Textor SC, Wilson DJ, Lerma A, Romero GC, Burnett JC Jr, Wiesner R, Dickson ER, Krom RAF. Renal hemodynamics, urinary eicosanoids, and endothelin after liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1992;54:74–80.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Bunchman TE, Brookshire CA. Cyclosporine-induced synthesis of endothelin by cultured endothelial cells. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:310–314.

12. Takeda Y, Itoh Y, Yoneda T, Miyamori I, Takeda R. Cyclosporine A induced endothelin-1 release from cultured rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;233:299–301.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Kon V, Sugiura M, Inagami T, Harvie BR, Ichikawa I, Hoover RL. Role of endothelin in cyclosporine-induced glomerular dysfunction. Kidney Int. 1990;37:1487–1491.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Fogo A, Hellings SE, Inagami T, Kon V. Endothelin receptor antagonism is protective in in vivo acute cyclosporine toxicity. Kidney Int. 1992;42:770–774.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Kim HS, Kim DH, Kang SW, Choi KH, Lee HY, Han DS, Lee YH, Kang BS. L-Arginine restores suppressed acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in cyclosporine A-treated rats. Transplant Proc. 1996;28:1372–1374.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Konishi M, Su C. Role of endothelium in dilator responses of spontaneously hypertensive rat arteries. Hypertension. 1983;5:881–886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Lamb FS, Webb RC. Cyclosporine augments reactivity of isolated blood vessels. Life Sci. 1987;40:2571–2578.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Rego A, Vargas R, Wroblewska B, Foegh ML, Ramwell P. Attenuation of vascular relaxation and cyclic GMP responses in cyclosporine A. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990;252:165–170.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Van der Zypp A, Majewski H. Effect of cGMP inhibitors on the actions of nitrodilators in rat aorta. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1998;25:38–43.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Lopez BL, Christopher TA, Yue TL, Ruffolo R, Feuerstein GZ, Ma XL. Carvedilol, a new beta-adrenoreceptor blocker antihypertensive drug, protects against free-radical-induced endothelial dysfunction. Pharmacology. 1995;51:165–173.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Bossaller C, Förstermann U, Hertel R, Olbricht C, Reschke V, Fleck E. Cyclosporine A inhibits endothelin-dependent vasodilatation and vascular prostacyclin production. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;165:165–169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Verbeke M, VanDeVoorde J, de Ridder L, Lameire N. Functional analysis of vascular dysfunction in cyclosporine treated rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1152–1156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Gallego MJ, Garcia AL, Lopez AJ, Garcia JL, Placidad MG, Casado S, Hernando L, Caramelo CA. Mechanism of the endothelial toxicity of cyclosporine A: role of nitric oxide, cGMP, and Ca2+. Circ Res. 1994;74:477–484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Bloom IT, Bentley FR, Spain DA, Garrison RN. An experimental study of altered nitric oxide metabolism as a mechanism of cyclosporin-induced renal vasoconstriction. Br J Surg. 1995;82:195–198.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Khalil A, Carrier M, Latour JG, Pelletier LC. Cyclosporin A–induced coronary artery vasoconstriction through myogenic and endothelium-dependent mechanisms. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl II):II-308–II-311.

26. Sudhir K, MacGregor JS, DeMarco T, De Groot CJM, Taylor RN, Chou TM, Yock PG, Chatterjee K. Cyclosporine impairs release of endothelium-derived relaxing factors in epicardial and resistance coronary arteries. Circulation. 1994;90:3018–3023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Richards NT, Poston L, Hilton P. Cyclosporin A inhibits endothelium-dependent, prostanoid-induced relaxation in human subcutaneous resistance vessels. J Hypertens. 1990;8:159–163.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Marumo T, Nakaki T, Hishikawa K, Suzuki H. Cyclosporin A inhibits nitric oxide synthase induction in vascular smooth cells. Hypertension. 1995;25(pt 2):764–768.

29. Chan BB, Kern JA, Flanagan TL, Kron IL, Tribble CG. Effects of in vivo cyclosporine administration on endothelium-dependent responses in isolated vascular rings. Circulation. 1992;86(suppl II):II-295–II-299.

30. Galle J, Schenck I, Schollmeyer P, Wanner C. Cyclosporine and oxidized lipoproteins affect vascular reactivity: influence of the endothelium. Hypertension. 1993;21:315–321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Amore A, Gianoglio B, Ghigo D, Peruzzi L, Porcellini MG, Bussolino F, Costamagna C, Cacace G, Picciotto G, Mazzucco G. A possible role for nitric oxide in modulating the functional cyclosporine toxicity by arginine. Kidney Int. 1995;47:1507–1514.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. O'Neil GS, Chester AH, Sudhir K, Rose M, Tadjkarimi S, Yacoub MH. Cyclosporin treatment does not impair the release of nitric oxide in human coronary arteries. Br Heart J. 1991;66:212–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Massoudy P, Zahler S, Kupatt C, Reder E, Becker BF, Gerlach E. Cardioprotection by cyclosporine A in experimental ischemia and reperfusion: evidence for nitric oxide-dependent mechanism mediated by endothelin. J Mol Cardiol. 1997;29:535–544.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Lopez-Ongil S, Saura M, Rodriguez-Puyol D, Rodriguez-Puyol M, Lamas S. Regulation of endothelial NO synthase expression by cyclosporin A in bovine aortic endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 1996;271(3 pt 2):H1072–H1078.

35. Stroes ESG, Luscher TF, de Groot FG, Koomans HA, Rabelink TJ. Cyclosporin A increases nitric oxide activity in vivo. Hypertension. 1997;29:570–575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Palmer RMJ, Ashton D, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide from L-arginine. Nature (Lond). 1988;333:664–666.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. Esteva-Font, E. Ars, E. Guillen-Gomez, J. M. Campistol, L. Sanz, W. Jimenez, M. A. Knepper, F. Torres, R. Torra, J. A. Ballarin, et al.
Ciclosporin-induced hypertension is associated with increased sodium transporter of the loop of Henle (NKCC2)
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2810 - 2816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Slattery, E. Campbell, T. McMorrow, and M. P. Ryan
Cyclosporine A-Induced Renal Fibrosis: A Role for Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2005; 167(2): 395 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. Tsuruoka, G. J. Schwartz, M. Wakaumi, K. Nishiki, H. Yamamoto, J. M. Purkerson, and A. Fujimura
Nitric Oxide Production Modulates Cyclosporin A-Induced Distal Renal Tubular Acidosis in the Rat
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2003; 305(3): 840 - 845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Vetter, Z.-J. Chen, G.-D. Chang, D. Che, S. Liu, and C.-H. Chang
Cyclosporin A Disrupts Bradykinin Signaling Through Superoxide
Hypertension, May 1, 2003; 41(5): 1136 - 1142.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
W. Zhang
Old and new tools to dissect calcineurin's role in pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy
Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2002; 53(2): 294 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. D. Vaziri, K. Liang, and H. Azad
Effect of Cyclosporine on HMG-CoA Reductase, Cholesterol 7alpha -Hydroxylase, LDL Receptor, HDL Receptor, VLDL Receptor, and Lipoprotein Lipase Expressions
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2000; 294(2): 778 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. Galle, C. Lehmann-Bodem, U. Hubner, A. Heinloth, and C. Wanner
CyA and OxLDL cause endothelial dysfunction in isolated arteries through endothelin-mediated stimulation of O2- formation
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Navarro-Antolin, J. Rey-Campos, and S. Lamas
Transcriptional Induction of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Gene by Cyclosporine A. A ROLE FOR ACTIVATOR PROTEIN-1
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2000; 275(5): 3075 - 3080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. B. Harris, H. Ju, V. J. Venema, H. Liang, R. Zou, B. J. Michell, Z.-P. Chen, B. E. Kemp, and R. C. Venema
Reciprocal Phosphorylation and Regulation of Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase in Response to Bradykinin Stimulation
J. Biol. Chem., May 4, 2001; 276(19): 16587 - 16591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oriji, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keiser, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oriji, G. K.
Right arrow Articles by Keiser, H. R.