| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Hypertension. 1998;32:862-868.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the University "La Sapienza," Chair of I Clinica Medica, Andrea Cesalpino Foundation (C.F., G.D., L. De S.), and Departments of Experimental Medicine (C.B.) and Internal Medicine and Cardiology (E.G., S.C., A.S.), University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Correspondence to Claudio Ferri, MD, Università "La Sapienza, " Cattedra di I Clinica Medica, Fondazione Andrea Cesalpino, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Roma, Italy. E-mail clferri{at}axrma.uniroma1.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: endothelium cell adhesion molecules vasorelaxation sodium blood pressure
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To elucidate the involvement of vascular endothelium in human salt-sensitive hypertension, plasma levels of several markers of endothelial damage, ie, ET-1, vWf, and soluble (S-) adhesion molecules E-selectin,12 intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1),13 vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1),14 and UAE were measured in uncomplicated, nondiabetic, nonobese, never-treated essential hypertensives. Since glucose ingestion is known to modulate ET-115 and S-ICAM-113 release, all measurements were repeated after an oral glucose tolerance test. Because of interrelations among accelerated erythrocyte Na+/Li+ countertransport, cardiovascular and renal damage,2 and metabolic disturbances,16 activity of this Na+ transporter and lipid profile were also assessed. Evaluations were made after an intermediate, a low, and a high NaCl intake according to a random, double-blind, crossover protocol.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% carbohydrate, 20% fat, and 30%
protein and was controlled for NaCl (120 mmol/d),
Ca2+ (20 mmol/d), Mg2+
(10 mmol/d), and K+ (60 mmol/d). We
required that Na+ excretion be >80 and
<130 mmol/24 h. Eight patients were considered noncompliant, and
the remaining 57 were admitted to the clinic for assessment of plasma
glucose, insulin, ET-1, S-E-selectin, S-ICAM-1, S-VCAM-1, and vWf
levels at baseline and after oral glucose load (75 g). On the same
occasion, triceps, subscapular, and iliac skinfold thicknesses were
evaluated by a skinfold caliper.
Dietary NaCl Intervention Study
Four patients were noncompliant, and 2 patients were lost during
the above period. In the remaining 51 patients, salt sensitivity was
assessed according to a random, double-blind, crossover protocol, as
already described.7 18 Briefly, each patient was
given a 20-mmol NaCl per day diet, without change in the other diet
components. A daily supplement of 10 capsules containing 10 mmol
NaCl each was given to all subjects to obtain 120 mmol NaCl per
day. After 1 week on the above diet, 5 patients were noncompliant and
were eliminated from the study group. The remaining 46 patients were
randomly, double-blindly assigned to a high (220 mmol NaCl per
day) or a low (20 mmol NaCl per day) NaCl intake for 2 weeks.
Different NaCl diets were obtained by changing the NaCl contents of
capsules, ie, 0 mmol on the low and 20 mmol on the high NaCl
intake. Patients were considered compliant when
Na+ excretion was >200 and <30 mmol/24 h
in urine collections obtained during the high and the low
Na+ intake, respectively. Four patients were
noncompliant, 2 were lost, and 1 reported gastric pain. Thus, salt
sensitivity was assessed in 39 patients. UAE was measured on 24-hour
urine collections used for assessing compliance to the diet. A patient
was classified as salt sensitive when mean blood pressure varied
10 mm Hg from low to high NaCl intake. Eight healthy subjects
without family histories of hypertension or myocardial infarction
served as controls.
Laboratory Measurements
Plasma ET-1 levels were assessed by reverse-phase
high-performance liquid chromatography followed
by radioimmunoassay (Peninsula
Laboratories).15 19 Plasma vWf
(Boehringer Mannheim Co), S-E-selectin (R & D Systems),
S-ICAM-1 (Genzyme Diagnostics), and S-VCAM-1 (R & D) were
assessed by immunoenzymatic methods. Insulin was assayed by
radioimmunoassay (Ares Serono). Serum HDL cholesterol
levels were assessed by enzymatic methods (Boehringer
Mannheim), and LDL and VLDL cholesterol levels were
assessed by the method of Friedewald et al.20
Erythrocyte Na+ transporter activities were
tested as already described.20 UAE was evaluated
by nephelometry.
Statistical Analysis
Differences among groups were tested for significance by 1-way
ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis. Linear regression and
correlation tested relations among variables. The
2 method tested descriptive
parameters. Areas under the curve were calculated by
trapezoidal integration. Statistical significance was assumed at
P<0.05. Data are given as mean±SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Baseline Comparison Between Salt-Sensitive and Salt-Resistant
Hypertensives
Eighteen hypertensives were classified as salt sensitive and
21 as salt resistant. Salt-sensitive patients showed a more
frequent family history of hypertension and myocardial infarction and
higher body mass index, subscapular skinfold thickness, and
waist-to-hip ratio than salt-resistant patients (Table 1
). LDL
cholesterol level was higher, while HDL
cholesterol was lower in salt-sensitive than
salt-resistant patients (Table 1
). Postload insulin levels were
higher in the first than in the second group (Figure 1
). Insulin and glucose areas under the
curve were greater in salt-sensitive than salt-resistant
patients (Figures 1
and 2
). Plasma ET-1
(P<0.05), vWf (P<0.004), and S-E-selectin
(P=0.04) levels and UAE (P=0.04) were higher in
salt-sensitive (ET-1, 1.56±0.85 pg/mL; vWf, 1.66±0.51 kU/L;
S-E-selectin, 1.09±0.31 µg/L; UAE, 21.77±2.80 µg/min) than
salt-resistant patients (ET-1, 1.08±0.56 pg/mL; vWf,
1.21±0.40 kU/L; S-E-selectin, 0.88±0.29 µg/L; UAE, 20.09±2.01
µg/min). Plasma S-ICAM-1 and S-VCAM-1 levels were similar
in the 2 subgroups: S-ICAM-1 (ng/mL): salt sensitive, 596.6±177.1;
salt resistant, 516.9±147.9, P=NS; S-VCAM-1
(ng/mL): salt sensitive, 541.1±157.8; salt resistant,
449.5±158.9, P=NS.
Na+/K+/2Cl-
cotransport and Na+/Li+
countertransport activities were higher in salt-sensitive than
salt-resistant patients (Table 1
). Blood pressure levels were
unrelated to soluble adhesion molecule, vWf, or ET-1 concentrations in
both patient groups, whereas significant correlations between UAE and
blood pressure levels were observable in salt-sensitive
(systolic: r=0.500, P=0.035;
diastolic: r=0.586, P=0.011) and
salt-resistant patients (systolic: r=0.481,
P=0.027; diastolic: r=0.464,
P=0.034). Circulating ET-1 levels correlated with plasma vWf
concentrations and Na+/Li+
countertransport activity (Figure 3
),
while plasma S-E-selectin correlated with vWf and ET-1 levels in
salt-sensitive patients (Figure 4
).
|
|
|
|
Endothelium-Derived Substances and UAE Responses to
NaCl Variations
In salt-sensitive patients, changes in NaCl intake did not affect
plasma S-ICAM-1, S-VCAM-1, and vWf levels, whereas they significantly
influenced plasma ET-1 (intermediate, 1.56±0.85; low, 1.22±0.54; high
NaCl diet, 1.78±0.63 pg/mL; P=0.002), and S-E-selectin
levels (intermediate, 1.09±0.31; low, 0.91±0.35; high NaCl diet,
1.33±0.44 µg/L; P=0.02) and UAE (intermediate,
21.77±2.80; low, 19.66±2.37; high NaCl diet, 23.83±2.37 µg/min;
P=0.02). In salt-resistant patients, changes in NaCl
intake did not affect plasma vWf and S-E-selectin levels, whereas they
influenced plasma S-ICAM-1 (intermediate, 516.86±147.99; low,
465.48±142.29; high NaCl diet, 597.38±233.40 ng/mL;
P=0.03), S-VCAM-1 (intermediate, 449.48±158.91; low,
442.14±200.75; high NaCl diet, 539.33±168.06 ng/mL;
P=0.02), and ET-1 levels (intermediate, 1.08±0.59; low,
1.12±0.57; high NaCl diet, 1.32±0.40 pg/mL; P=0.02) and
UAE (intermediate, 20.09±2.01; low, 19.31±1.94; high NaCl diet,
20.56±2.70 µg/min; P<0.05 high versus low). UAE
correlated with blood pressure levels in salt-sensitive (high NaCl,
systolic: r=0.486, P=0.041;
diastolic: r=0.510, P=0.031; low
NaCl, systolic: r=0.480, P=0.044;
diastolic: r=0.516, P=0.031) and
salt-resistant patients (high NaCl, systolic:
r=0.481, P=0.028; diastolic:
r=0.461, P=0.028; low NaCl, systolic:
r=0.523, P=0.015; diastolic:
r=0.453, P=0.039).
Responses of Endothelium-Derived Substances
to Oral Glucose Load During Different NaCl Diets
After the intermediate NaCl diet, oral glucose load induced
significant plasma ET-1 increments in salt-sensitive (from 1.56±0.85
to 2.34±0.87 after 120 minutes; P<0.05 versus baseline and
P<0.05 versus salt-resistant patients) but not
salt-resistant patients. Plasma levels of other
endothelium-derived substances were not affected by the
glucose challenge on all NaCl diets.
Metabolic Parameters and
Na+ Transporters During Low and High NaCl Diets
The "atherogenic" pattern of circulating lipoproteins observed
after the baseline diet was more evident after NaCl loading in
salt-sensitive patients (Table 2
). In the
same subgroup, marked hyperinsulinemic responses to
oral glucose load were more evident after the high than the low NaCl
diet (Figure 1
). Activities of
Na+/K+/2Cl-
cotransport and Na+/Li+
countertransport during the low and the high NaCl diets are shown in
Table 3
.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The increased levels of circulating substances that have been indicated as markers for vascular damage3 7 9 14 strongly support the hypothesis that salt-sensitive hypertensives are a subset at increased risk for developing hypertension-related cardiovascular diseases.1 Accordingly, we confirmed that the Vmax of Na+/Li+ countertransport, a well-known marker of hypertension-related cardiorenal abnormalities2 and insulin resistance,21 was higher in salt-sensitive than salt-resistant patients.2 20 Similarly, we confirmed that salt-sensitive hypertensives tended to be hyperlipemic11 and displayed the greatest insulin responses to oral glucose load20 on all diets, particularly on the high NaCl diet.
To further support our hypothesis, a positive family history for myocardial infarction was more frequent in salt-sensitive than salt-resistant patients. Although a family history of coronary artery disease does not imply per se that individual cardiovascular risk is increased, a familial clustering of hypertension and early myocardial infarction has been recently observed in unselected hypertensives,22 in salt-sensitive hypertensives with delayed renal and endocrine responses to saline infusion,23 and in non-modulators, a subset of hypertensives that often manifests salt sensitivity.16
In this regard, the role of endothelium-derived substances as indicators of endothelial damage is unclear. In uncomplicated hypertensives, plasma S-E-selectin concentrations correlated with minimal vascular resistance, an index of hypertension-related vascular damage.12 Moreover, plasma S-E-selectin and vWf levels were directly correlated in mild and severe essential hypertensives.24 Thus, these findings support the hypothesis that plasma ET-1, vWf, and S-E-selectin levels are increased in subjects with more marked vascular damage, even in the absence of overt atherosclerotic lesions.
The possibility that endothelial substances might favor the development of hypertension-related vascular damage should also be considered. In particular, ET-1 is elevated in plasma from atherosclerotic patients,4 7 while vWf mediates platelet adhesion to the endothelium and protects factor VIII against proteolysis.10 With regard to adhesion molecules, E-selectin is not released by resting vascular endothelial cells25 and regulates leukocyte adhesion to the endothelium.26 Accordingly, increased S-E-selectin expression by endothelial cells and marked interaction with the natural ligand sialyl-Lewisx expressed by leukocytes infiltrating the vascular wall have been shown in human atheroma.27 Thus, E-selectin might favor the development of vascular damage in salt-sensitive hypertensives. By contrast, a similar role cannot be proposed for ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, since levels of their soluble fractions were not higher than normal in the whole hypertensive population and/or in salt-sensitive than salt-resistant hypertensives. In this context, we have recently demonstrated28 that hypertension did not influence plasma levels of S-VCAM-1 and S-ICAM-1 in glucose-intolerant essential hypertensives. Thus, different signal mechanisms could activate selectins but not cellular adhesion molecules in essential hypertension. Consistently, plasma S-E-selectin but not S-ICAM-1 and S-VCAM-1 levels increased with high NaCl diet in salt-sensitive patients.
Another interesting result is the ET-1 increments observed after oral glucose load in salt-sensitive patients. This finding could be due to the stimulatory action of insulin on ET-1 release15 and suggests that ET-1 favors insulin resistance in salt-sensitive individuals. Indeed, insulin-mediated glucose uptake is also due to endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation.29 Thus, insulin-related ET-1 increase could counteract the vasodilatory action of insulin. Accordingly, a negative correlation between insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and plasma ET-1 levels has been demonstrated in type 2 diabetics.30
With regard to the elevated activities of Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport and Na+/Li+ countertransport in salt-sensitive patients, similar data were previously obtained in such patients.20 Overactivity of Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport was increased by a high NaCl diet,20 thereby indicating that this Na+ transporter could affect individual pressor susceptibility to "inappropriate" NaCl intake. Data from Milan hypertensive rats31 and essential hypertensives31 suggest that the elevated Vmax of Na+/K+/2Cl- cotransport reflects its elevated activity at the renal tubular level, which in turn enhances Na+ reabsorption and pressor sensitivity to NaCl intake. Similarly, the increased Vmax of Na+/Li+ countertransport, which represents the in vitro mode of operation of Na+/H+ antiport,2 could be present in vascular smooth muscle and renal tubular cells and lead to hypertension by increasing contractility and Na+ reabsorption.2
In conclusion, we demonstrated increased circulating S-E-selectin, vWf, and ET-1 levels and UAE in salt-sensitive hypertensives. These patients also displayed increased insulin responses to oral glucose load, elevated circulating LDL cholesterol levels, and accelerated Vmax of Na+/Li+ countertransport. Our findings strongly support the hypothesis1 that an increased blood pressure sensitivity to NaCl intake is correlated with an elevated risk for developing cardiovascular and renal sequelae of hypertension.
Received April 13, 1998; first decision April 30, 1998; accepted July 1, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Nosadini R, Semplicini A, Fioretto P, Lusiani L,
Trevisan R, Donadon V, Zanette G, Nicolosi GL, Dall'Aglio V, Zanuttini
D, Viberti G. Sodium-lithium countertransport and cardiorenal
abnormalities in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;18:191198.
3. Pessina AC, Rossi GP. Hypertension as a mechanism of atherosclerosis: focus on hemodynamic and endothelial factors. High Blood Press. 1993;2:259270.
4. Draaijer P, Kool MJ, Maessen J, van Bortel LM, de Leuuw PW, van Hooff JP, Leunissen KM. Vascular distensibility and compliance in salt-sensitive and salt-resistant borderline hypertension. J Hypertens. 1993;11:11991207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, Di Francesco L, De Mattia G, Santucci A. Dysfonction endotheliale dans l'hypertension arterielle sensible au sel. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996;89:8 971974.
6. Hoffman A, Grossman E, Goldstein DS, Gill JR, Keiser HR. Urinary excretion rate of endothelin-1 in patients with essential hypertension and salt-sensitivity. Kidney Int. 1994;45:556560.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, Mazzocchi C, De Siati L, Santucci A. Elevated plasma and urinary endothelin-1 levels in human salt-sensitive hypertension. Clin Sci. 1997;93:3541.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. O'Donnel MJ, Barnett AH. Microalbuminuria in essential hypertension. In: Mogensen CE, ed. Microalbuminuria: A Marker of Organ Damage. London, England: Science Press LTD; 1996:6375.
9. Pedrinelli R, Giampietro O, Carmassi F, Melilio E, Dell'Omo A, Catapano G, Morale M, Di Bello V. Microalbuminuria and endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1994;344:1418.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Blann AD. von Willebrand factor and endothelium in vascular disease. Br J Biomed Sci. 1993;50:125134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Baldari D, Sgherri G, Baldari G,
Campese VM. Microalbuminuria in salt-sensitive patients: a
marker for renal and cardiovascular risk factors.
Hypertension. 1994;23:195199.
12. Ghiadoni L, Taddei S, Virdis A, Almerigogna F, Basta G, De Caterina R, Salvetti A. Are soluble E-selectin levels an index of structural alterations in patients with essential hypertension? J Hypertens. 1996;14(suppl 1):196199.
13. Ceriello A, Falleti E, Bortolotti N, Motz E, Cavarape A, Gonano F, Bartoli E. Increased circulating levels of ICAM-1 in type II diabetic patients: the role of oxidative stress and metabolic control. Diabetologia.. 1996;38:A41. Abstract.
14. Jang Y, Lincoff AM, Plow EF, Topol EJ. Cell adhesion molecules in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:15911601.[Abstract]
15. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, De Mattia G, Santucci A. Endogenous insulin modulates circulating endothelin-1 concentrations in humans. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:504506.[Abstract]
16.
Ferri C, Bellini C, Baldoncini R, Leonetti Luparini R,
Perrone A, Santucci A. Abnormal atrial natriuretic peptide
and renal responses to saline infusion in nonmodulating essential
hypertensive patients. Circulation. 1994;90:28592869.
17. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN, Savage DD, Laragh JH. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in men and women with essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:345352.
18. Bellini C, Ferri C, Carlomagno A, Necozione S, Desideri G, Santucci A. Impaired inactive to active kallikrein conversion in human salt-sensitive hypertension. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:25652577.[Abstract]
19. Ferri C, Bellini C, Desideri G, Baldoncini R, Santucci A, De Mattia G. Plasma endothelin-1 levels in obese and non-obese hypertensive patients. Diabetes. 1995;44:431436.[Abstract]
20. Friedewald WT, Levy R, Frederickson D. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma without use of preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499502.[Abstract]
21.
Doria A, Fioretto PA, Avogaro A, Carraro A, Morocutti
A, Trevisan R, Frigato F, Crepaldi G, Viberti G, Nosadini R. Insulin
resistance is associated with high sodium-lithium countertransport in
essential hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:E684E691.
22. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Hasstedt SJ, Hopkins PN, Wu LL, Berry TD, Stults BM, Barlow GK, Schumacher CM, Lifton RP, Lalouel JM. Multigenic human hypertension: evidence for subtypes and hope for haplotypes. J Hypertens. 1990;8(suppl 7):S39S46.
23.
Volpe M, Lembo G, De Luca N, Lamenza F, Tritto C,
Ricciardelli R, Molaro M, Condorelli G, Rendina V, Trimarco B,
Condorelli M. Abnormal hormonal and renal responses to saline load in
hypertensive patients with a parental history of
cardiovascular accidents. Circulation. 1991;84:92100.
24. Blann AD, Tse W, Maxwell SJR, Waite MA. Increased levels of the soluble adhesion molecules E selectin in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1994;12:925928.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Frenette PS, Wagner DD. Adhesion molecules, part II:
blood vessels and blood cells. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:4345.
26. Van der Wal AC, Das PK, Tigger AJ, Becker AE. Adhesion molecules on the endothelium and mononuclear cells in human atherosclerotic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1992;141:14271433.[Abstract]
27. Newman W, Beall LD, Carson CW, Hunder GG, Graben N, Randhawa ZI. Soluble E-selectin is found in supernatants of activated endothelial cells and is elevated in patients with septic shock. J Immunol. 1993;150:644654.[Abstract]
28. Ferri C, Desideri G, Baldoncini R, Bellini C, De Angelis C, Mazzocchi C, Santucci A. Early activation of the vascular endothelium in nonobese, nondiabetic essential hypertensive patients with multiple metabolic abnormalities. Diabetes. 1998;47:660667.[Abstract]
29. Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Impaired insulin-mediated skeletal muscle blood flow in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes. 1992;41:10761083.[Abstract]
30. Ferri C, Bellini C, Laurenti O, Santucci A, De Mattia G. Circulating endothelin-1 levels increase during euglycaemic hyperinsulinemic clamp in lean NIDDM men. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:226233.[Abstract]
31. Bianchi G, Ferrari P, Barber B. Lessons from experimental genetic hypertension. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, eds. Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1990:901922.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. J Epstein Efficacy and Safety of Darusentan: A Novel Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2008; 42(7): 1060 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Imig Epoxide hydrolase and epoxygenase metabolites as therapeutic targets for renal diseases Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): F496 - F503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. del Villar, C. J. G. Alonso, C. A. Feldstein, L. A. Juncos, and J. C. Romero Role of Endothelin in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2005; 80(1): 84 - 96. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Sowers Insulin resistance and hypertension Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1597 - H1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Li, Y. Chu, G. D. Fink, J. F. Engelhardt, D. D. Heistad, and A. F. Chen Endothelin-1 Stimulates Arterial VCAM-1 Expression Via NADPH Oxidase-Derived Superoxide in Mineralocorticoid Hypertension Hypertension, November 1, 2003; 42(5): 997 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Preston, W. Jy, J. J. Jimenez, L. M. Mauro, L. L. Horstman, M. Valle, G. Aime, and Y. S. Ahn Effects of Severe Hypertension on Endothelial and Platelet Microparticles Hypertension, February 1, 2003; 41(2): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Pedrinelli, G. Dell'Omo, G. Penno, and M. Mariani Non-diabetic microalbuminuria, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2001; 6(4): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. McFarlane, M. Banerji, and J. R. Sowers Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Disease J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 713 - 718. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Elijovich, C. L. Laffer, E. Amador, H. Gavras, M. R. Bresnahan, and E. L. Schiffrin Regulation of Plasma Endothelin by Salt in Salt-Sensitive Hypertension Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103(2): 263 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Desideri, A. Gaspardone, M. Gentile, A. Santucci, P. A. Gioffre, and C. Ferri Endothelial Activation in Patients With Cardiac Syndrome X Circulation, November 7, 2000; 102(19): 2359 - 2364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Di Gennaro, A. Barilli, C. Giuffredi, C. Gatti, A. Montanari, and P. P. Vescovi Sodium Sensitivity of Blood Pressure in Long-Term Detoxified Alcoholics Hypertension, April 1, 2000; 35(4): 869 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pastore, A. Tessitore, S. Martinotti, E. Toniato, E. Alesse, M. C. Bravi, C. Ferri, G. Desideri, A. Gulino, and A. Santucci Angiotensin II Stimulates Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Expression by Human Vascular Endothelial Cells and Increases Soluble ICAM-1 Release In Vivo Circulation, October 12, 1999; 100(15): 1646 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hypertension Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1998 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |