(Hypertension. 1998;32:907-916.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.
Scientific Contributions |
From the Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California at San Diego, and San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, Calif.
Correspondence to Daniel T. O'Connor, MD, Department of Medicine and Center for Molecular Genetics (9111H), University of California at San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161. E-mail doconnor{at}ucsd.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
350
nmol/L) secretory inhibitor. Inhibition was specific for
nicotinic cholinergic stimulation since PAMP-[1-20] failed to inhibit
release by agents that bypass the nicotinic receptor. Nicotinic
cationic (22Na+,45Ca2+)
signal transduction was disrupted by this peptide, and potencies for
inhibition of 22Na+ uptake and
catecholamine secretion were comparable. Even high-dose
nicotine failed to overcome the inhibition, suggesting noncompetitive
nicotinic antagonism. N- and C-terminal PAMP truncation peptides
indicated a role for the C-terminal amide and refined the minimal
active region to the C-terminal 8 amino acids (WNKWALSR-amide), a
region likely to be
-helical. PAMP also blocked (EC50
270 nmol/L) nicotinic cholinergic agonist desensitization of
catecholamine release, as well as desensitization of
nicotinic signal transduction (22Na+ uptake).
Thus, PAMP may exert both inhibitory and facilitatory
effects on nicotinic signaling, depending on the prior state of
nicotinic stimulation. PAMP may therefore contribute to a novel,
autocrine, homeostatic (negative-feedback) mechanism controlling
catecholamine release.
Key Words: chromogranin adrenal gland chromaffin granule adrenomedullin catecholamines
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proadrenomedullin N-terminal 20 peptide (PAMP-[1-20];
ARLDVASEFRKKWNKWALSR-amide) is liberated from proadrenomedullin by
proteolytic cleavage at the first group of basic amino acids
(Gly42Lys43Arg44),
after which PAMP-[1-20] is posttranslationally amidated at its
carboxy terminus in response to the Gly signal for the enzyme
peptidylglycine
-amidating monooxygenase. cDNA sequences
of rat, pig, and human forms show 80% sequence identity of the
PAMP-[1-20] region (Table 1
),
and 12 amino acids at the C-terminus are conserved in all 3
species1 2 3 (Table 1
). PAMP-[1-20] is found in
plasma, adrenal medulla, right atrium, kidney, and
brain4 5 and exerts hypotensive activity in the
rat and cat.1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Plasma levels of
PAMP-[1-20] are elevated in human disease states such as essential
hypertension,13 renal
failure,14 and congestive heart
failure,15 as well as in the spontaneously
hypertensive rat.16 While adrenomedullin
decreases vascular resistance by a direct action on vascular smooth
muscle or by releasing nitric oxide from the
endothelium,17 18 19 20 PAMP may
induce vasodilation by a variety of site- or species-dependent
mechanisms: inhibition of norepinephrine release from
adrenergic nerve endings in the mesenteric vascular bed of the
rat,5 21 direct or tone-dependent vasodilation in
the hindquarters vascular bed of the rat,9 or
cAMP-mediated vasodilator activity in the mesenteric and hindlimb
vascular beds of the cat.10 22 Recently,
PAMP-[9-20] (a carboxy-terminal fragment of PAMP) has been identified
in porcine adrenal medulla and causes hypotension on
intravenous injection in the rat.7
Synthetic human PAMP-[12-20] is also a vasodepressor in the rat and
cat.8
|
In bovine chromaffin cells, PAMP-[1-20] has been reported to inhibit nicotinic agonistinduced catecholamine secretion23 and synthesis24 and nicotinic agonistinduced Na+ and Ca2+ influx.23 25 However, the precise mechanism or site of PAMP-[1-20] action remains in doubt, with different reports implicating the nicotinic cholinergic receptor23 25 or an alternative mechanism involving a G proteincoupled receptor inhibiting voltage-gated calcium currents.26
We examined the effects of PAMP-[1-20] on catecholamine
secretion from rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, determining the crucial
active residues in its sequence. We also studied its actions on signal
transduction mechanisms for catecholamine release and
uncovered a novel effect on nicotinic cholinergic desensitization. Our
results reveal that PAMP-[1-20] inhibits catecholamine
secretion (IC50
350 nmol/L), acting in a
noncompetitive manner specifically at the nicotinic cholinergic
receptor; in addition, PAMP-[1-20] inhibits the desensitization of
catecholamine release evoked by nicotinic agonists. Peptide
deletion studies establish that the carboxy-terminal domain of
PAMP-[1-20] is crucial to its antisecretory activity.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In some experiments, cells were pretreated with pertussis toxin (100 ng/mL, 16 hours).29
Secretagogue-Stimulated Release of Norepinephrine
Secretion of norepinephrine was monitored as
previously described.28 PC12 cells were plated on
poly-D-lysinecoated polystyrene dishes (Falcon
Labware), labeled for 3 hours with 1 µCi
[3H]L-norepinephrine
(71.7 Ci/mmol, DuPont/NEN) in 1 mL of PC12 growth medium, washed twice
with release buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 2
mmol/L CaCl2, 10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7), and
then incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes in release buffer with or
without secretagogues, such as nicotine (60 µmol/L), or cell
membrane depolarization (55 mmol/L KCl). Release buffer for
experiments involving KCl as secretagogue had NaCl reduced to 100
mmol/L to maintain isotonicity. After 30 minutes, secretion was
terminated by aspirating the release buffer and lysing cells into
150 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7,
0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100. Release medium and cell lysates were
assayed for [3H]norepinephrine by
liquid scintillation counting, and results were expressed as percent
secretion: [amount released/(amount released+amount in cell
lysate)]x100. Net secretion is secretagogue-stimulated release minus
basal release, where basal norepinephrine release is
typically 5.8±0.36% of cell total
[3H]norepinephrine released over 30
minutes (n=10 separate secretion assays).
Synthetic Peptides
PAMP-[1-20]or its analogues were synthesized at 10 to 100
µmol scale by the solid-phase method30 with
t-boc or f-moc protection chemistry and then purified to >95%
homogeneity by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid
chromatography on C-18 silica columns, with monitoring
of A280 (aromatic rings) or
A214 (peptide bonds). Authenticity and purity of
peptides were verified by rechromatography, as well as
by electrospray-ionization or matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry or amino acid composition.
For some experiments, small-scale (1 µmol) peptide syntheses
were accomplished by pin technology (Chiron Mimotopes), after which
peptides were cleaved from the resin and washed.
Neuronal Differentiation of PC12 Cells With Nerve
Growth Factor
PC12 cells were split to 50% confluence and treated with nerve
growth factor (NGF) (2.5S, murine, natural, 100 ng/mL; GIBCO-BRL). The
medium was changed every other day with NGF addition to the new medium.
After 7 days of treatment, the neurite-bearing cells were used for
secretion studies, as described above.
22Na+ Uptake by PC12 Cells
22Na+ uptake was
studied as described by Amy and Kirshner31 with
minor modifications. Before experiments, PC12 cells were washed twice
with 50 mmol/L Na+-sucrose media containing
50 mmol/L NaCl, 187 mmol/L sucrose, 5 mmol/L KCl, 2
mmol/L CaCl2, and 5 mmol/L HEPES adjusted to
pH 7.4 with NaOH. To measure
22Na+ influx, this medium
was then supplemented with 5 mmol/L ouabain (to prevent active
extrusion of newly taken-up
22Na+ from cells) and 1.5
µCi/mL of 22NaCl. Incubation was performed at
22°C for 5 minutes, in the presence or absence of secretagogues, and
then the cells were washed within 10 seconds with 3 changes (1 mL each)
of 50 mmol/L Na+-sucrose media with 5
mmol/L ouabain. The cells were lysed (see above), and
22Na+ in the cell lysate
was measured in a gamma counter (LKB 1274 RIAGAMMA, Wallac Inc).
The data were expressed as disintegrations per minute per well.
45Ca2+ Uptake by PC12 Cells
Cells were seeded onto poly-D-lysinecoated 6-well
polystyrene culture dishes 2 days before assay. Cells were rinsed with
1 mL of release buffer and preincubated with 1 mL of release buffer for
30 minutes at 37°C. Then the cells were incubated for 5 minutes at
37°C in 1 mL of release buffer (without unlabeled calcium) containing
2 µCi of 45Ca2+ (14.95
mCi/mg, DuPont/NEN). The drugs tested were present in the release
buffer during the 1-minute incubation period. Calcium uptake was
stopped abruptly after 1 minute by inversion of the plate to decant all
6 wells simultaneously, followed promptly by addition of 2
mL of ice-cold release buffer containing 1 mmol/L
LaCl3; the nonselective calcium channel blocker
La3+ terminates further uptake of extracellular
labeled calcium.32 The culture dishes were then
rinsed twice with ice-cold release buffer. To cells in each well, 1 mL
of cell lysis buffer was added and collected for liquid scintillation
counting. The data were expressed as disintegrations per minute per
well.
Structure Predictions
Secondary structure of PAMP was first predicted by the empirical
statistical Chou-Fasman33 or
Robson-Garnier34 algorithms with the use of the
program MacVector (version 5.0.2; Oxford Molecular Group PLC).
Secondary structure predictions for amphiphilicity, in which
hydrophobic moment plots were used,35 were also
done on MacVector.
Homology modeling allowed prediction of 3-dimensional structure
on the basis of known (x-ray crystallographic or nuclear magnetic
resonancederived) structures of remote homologues in the Protein Data
Bank36 (PDB). Remote homologues were
detected by the method of prediction-based
threading37 on the EMBL Web
server.38
-Helical structures were created in
the graphic program Fold-It (light) (version
4.0.7; Reference 3939 and
jean-claude.jesior@imag.fr), and the PDB format (x,
y, z coordinates) fileswere imported into the
program CS Chem3D Pro (version 3.2; CambridgeSoft) for energy
minimization by molecular mechanics with the use of the MM2 force field
and the method of steepest descent. The MM2 force field includes both
covalent (bond stretching, bending, and torsion) and noncovalent (Van
der Waals, charge-charge, charge-dipole, and dipole-dipole) terms.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.35 µmol/L and
2.9 µmol/L,
respectively (Figure 1A
|
PAMP-[1-20]-amide activity was heat stable (no loss of inhibition
after heating to 100°C for 10 minutes; data not shown) and at least
partially reversible (Figure 1B
): after 1 hour of incubation with
PAMP-[1-20]-amide, two 10-minute washouts resulted in loss of
50%
of the catecholamine release inhibition on PC12 cells.
PAMP as a Noncompetitive Nicotinic Cholinergic Antagonist
To test whether PAMP exerted its nicotinic antagonist
action by a competitive or noncompetitive means, we stimulated PC12
cells with a spectrum of nicotine doses (10 to 1000 µmol/L),
alone or with PAMP-[1-20]-amide (0.1 to 10 µmol/L). Nicotine
failed to overcome inhibition by PAMP-[1-20]-amide at any agonist
dose (Figure 2
), and nicotine was not
able to reverse the blocking effects of even submaximal
inhibitory concentrations of PAMP. This result functionally
establishes PAMP as a noncompetitive nicotinic antagonist
(Figure 2
).
|
PAMP Biological Activity Resides Toward Its C-Terminus
To define active residues within the PAMP-[1-20] sequence, we
synthesized several PAMP analogues by N-terminal truncations
(PAMP-[4-20]-amide, PAMP-[7-20]-amide, PAMP-[10-20]-amide,
PAMP-[13-20]-amide, and PAMP-[16-20]-amide) or C-terminal
truncations (PAMP-[1-17], PAMP-[1-14], PAMP-[1-11], PAMP-[1-8],
and PAMP-[1-5]) and tested their effects on nicotine-induced
catecholamine secretion from PC12 cells. Initial N-terminal
truncation analogues did not impair PAMP activity; indeed,
PAMP-[10-20]-amide was even more active (IC50
0.045 µmol/L) than wild-type PAMP-[1-20]-amide (Figures 3A
and 5
). Although PAMP-[13-20]-amide
was still active (IC50
0.53 µmol/L for
inhibition of nicotine-induced catecholamine secretion),
PAMP-[16-20]-amide lost detectable activity
(IC50 >10 µmol/L). Any truncation from
the C-terminus severely reduced catecholamine
releaseinhibitory activity: removal of even the
C-terminal amide resulted in some loss of activity (to
IC50
2.9 µmol/L), while truncation of 3
C-terminal amino acids (in PAMP-[1-17]) completely
inactivated (IC50 >10 µmol/L)
the peptide (Figure 3B
).
|
|
PAMP Inhibition Specific for Nicotinic Cholinergic Stimulation of
Catecholamine Secretion
In addition to stimulation of the
physiological (nicotinic cholinergic) secretory
pathway (by nicotine, 60 µmol/L), we tested several
secretagogues that act at stages in the pathway later than the
nicotinic receptor (Table 2
): membrane
depolarization (55 mmol/L KCl) to open voltage-gated calcium
channels, an alkaline earth (BaCl2, 2
mmol/L; the effects of this secretagogue require participation of
calcium channels40), a calcium ionophore
(A23187, 1 µmol/L), or alkalinization of the chromaffin vesicle
core (chloroquine, 1 mmol/L). PAMP-[1-20]-amide suppressed
norepinephrine release only when triggered by nicotine
(Table 2
) and not when secretion was caused by agents acting later (ie,
distal to the nicotinic cholinergic receptor) in the secretory pathway
(Table 2
).
|
Stimulation of P2x purinergic receptors causes
catecholamine secretion from PC12
cells.41 Since P2x
receptors and nicotinic cholinergic receptors are members of the same
superfamily of extracellular ligand-gated cation
channels,41 we tested the effect of PAMP on the
function of this receptor, as well. Although the somewhat selective
P2x antagonist reactive blue
241 substantially inhibited ATP-stimulated
catecholamine release (from 52.1±0.09% to 20.6±1.49%
release), PAMP-[1-20] was without effect on this ligand-receptor
system (Table 2
).
PAMP Effect on Neurite-Bearing PC12 Cells
PAMP-[10-20]-amide (RKKWNKWALSR-amide) inhibited
catecholamine release from both normal PC12
(IC50
0.045 µmol/L) and NGF-treated
PC12 cells (IC50
0.083 µmol/L) (Figure 4
), with similar potencies.
|
PAMP and Nicotinic Cholinergic Signal Transduction:
Na+ and Ca2+ Cation Fluxes
PAMP-[10-20]-amide blocked nicotine-induced uptake of
22Na+ into PC12 cells, and
the blockade was dose dependent (Figure 5A
). The IC50 value
for inhibition of 22Na+
uptake by PAMP-[10-20]-amide was
0.09 µmol/L (Figure 5A
)
compared with
0.045 µmol/L for inhibition of
catecholamine release (Figure 5A
).
To test the specificity of PAMP action on nicotinic signaling
pathways, we studied the effects of PAMP-[1-20]-amide on
45Ca2+ uptake into PC12
cells induced by nicotine (60 µmol/L) or by membrane
depolarization (55 mmol/L KCl), which opens voltage-gated calcium
channels. While PAMP-[1-20]-amide completely abolished
nicotine-induced uptake of
45Ca2+, it failed to block
45Ca2+ uptake when
voltage-gated calcium channels were directly opened by membrane
depolarization (Figure 5B
).
Testing Involvement of Inhibitory G Proteins
in the PAMP Effect on PC12 Cells
To test whether the effect of PAMP on nicotine-induced
norepinephrine release might be mediated by
inhibitory G proteins, we pretreated PC12 cells with the
Gi/Go
inactivator pertussis toxin (100 ng/mL, 16
hours29) and then tested the effects of
PAMP-[1-20]-amide on nicotine-induced catecholamine
release. No effect of pertussis toxin on the PAMP-[1-20]-amide
antisecretory effect was noted (data not shown). Similar studies were
performed in NGF (100 ng/mL for 7 days)treated PC12 cells, and we
found no difference between pertussis toxinpretreated or control PC12
cells in inhibition of catecholamine release by
PAMP-[1-20]-amide (data not shown).
Role of PAMP Truncation Peptides in Inhibition of
Catecholamine Secretion by PAMP-[1-20]-amide
We tested whether any of these functionally inactive PAMP
truncation peptides antagonize the action of full-length
PAMP-[1-20]-amide. None of the inactive PAMP analogues
(PAMP-[16-20]-amide, PAMP-[1-17], PAMP-[1-14], PAMP-[1-11],
PAMP-[1-8], or PAMP-[1-5]) reversed the action of
PAMP-[1-20]-amide on nicotinic cholinergicstimulated
catecholamine release (Figure 6
).
|
PAMP Inhibition of Nicotinic Cholinergic Desensitization of
Catecholamine Release
Repeated or prolonged exposure of chromaffin cells to nicotinic
cholinergic agonists results in diminution of subsequent
catecholamine secretion responses to nicotinic
rechallenge.42 To determine whether PAMP
influences nicotinic desensitization, we exposed PC12 cells to nicotine
(10 µmol/L) for 10 minutes, either alone or in combination with
ascending doses (0.1 to 10 µmol/L) of PAMP-[1-20]-amide or
substance P (as a positive control42), removed
nicotine and PAMP-[1-20]-amide by washing twice, and then
rechallenged with nicotine (10 µmol/L) for 10 minutes. In
dose-dependent fashion, both PAMP-[1-20]-amide
(EC50
0.27 µmol/L) and substance P
(EC50
0.21 µmol/L) blocked the
desensitizing effect of prior nicotinic exposure on subsequent
nicotinic-stimulated
[3H]norepinephrine release (Figure 7A
).
|
PAMP Blockade of Nicotinic Desensitization of
22Na+ Uptake, the First Step in Nicotinic
Signal Transduction
To test whether PAMP blockade of desensitization of
catecholamine release is achieved at the most proximal step
in nicotinic cholinergic signaling, we studied the effect of PAMP on
22Na+ uptake during
nicotinic rechallenge. In the initial incubation (incubation I), PC12
cells were exposed to nicotine (10 µmol/L; 10 minutes), nicotine
plus PAMP- [10-20]-amide (10 µmol/L), or buffer alone.
After washout, the same groups were exposed to nicotine (10
µmol/L; 10 minutes) for measurement of cellular
22Na+ uptake. Prior
exposure to nicotine alone caused 82.1% diminution of
22Na+ uptake on reexposure
to nicotine, but prior coincubation with PAMP-[10-20]-amide (10
µmol/L) completely reversed this effect (returning to 100.1% of
secretion achieved without prior nicotine exposure; Figure 7B
).
PAMP Structure
Both the Chou-Fasman33 and
Robson-Garnier34 algorithms predicted an
-helical conformation for PAMP. The
-helix displayed no
amphiphilicity on hydrophobic moment plot.35
Twenty known-structure remote homologues of PAMP were detected by the
threading algorithm,37 with up to 30% (range,
15% to 30%) pairwise sequence identity with PAMP and with
Z alignment scores up to 1.83 (range, 1.34 to 1.83). The
homologous regions were found in the following PDB entries: 1bct, 4
gpb, 3 mdd, 1oct, 7ccp, 1hlb, 1 mgn, 2hmz, 1trk, 3ccp, 2cyp, 1ses,
1tph, 2spo, 2 mge, 1hle (4 regions), and 2ccy. Each of these homologous
regions was predominantly
-helical in the homologue of known
structure, especially toward the C-terminus of each segment. An
-helical conformation of the PAMP sequence was therefore created and
subjected to energy minimization; after 261 iterations in the MM2 force
field, the root mean square gradient (slope) minimized at 0.088,
indicating a local energy minimum. The resulting
-helix is displayed
in side (Figure 8A
) and axial (Figure 8B
)
views.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.35
µmol/L) of catecholamine secretion from PC12
pheochromocytoma cells, in keeping with an earlier
report23 in bovine chromaffin cells
(IC50
1.6 µmol/L). Our
results also indicate that this inhibition is specific for the
nicotinic cholinergic pathway, since inhibition did not occur after
secretory stimulation by a variety of maneuvers that bypass the
nicotinic receptor (Table 2
Similar potency of PAMP-[10-20]-amide in both normal PC12
(IC50
0.045 µmol/L) and neurite-bearing
PC12 cells (IC50
0.083 µmol/L) suggests
its activity in noradrenergic neurites as well as
chromaffin cells (Figure 4
).
As predicted for a nicotinic antagonist,
PAMP-[10-20]-amide blocked nicotinic-stimulated
Na+ entry (IC50
0.09 µmol/L) into the cytosol, and PAMP-[10-20]-amide
potency for blockade of Na+ entry (Figure 5A
) was
comparable to its potency for blockade of catecholamine
secretion (IC50
0.045 µmol/L; Figure 5A
); thus, nicotinic cholinergic antagonism is an entirely sufficient
mechanism to account for the PAMP antisecretory effect in this
setting.
In bovine chromaffin cells, Katoh et al23
and Niina et al24 found that PAMP-[1-20]-amide
inhibited not only carbachol-induced
22Na+ influx
(IC50
2.5 µmol/L) but also carbachol-
or nicotine-induced 45Ca2+
influx through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels.
We also found that PAMP-[1-20]-amide blocked influx of
45Ca2+ from the
extracellular space into the cytosol (Figure 5B
), but only when such
entry was triggered by nicotinic stimulation and not when triggered by
membrane depolarization (Figure 5B
), which opens calcium channels at a
signal transduction step distal to nicotinic
stimulation.40 In NGF-differentiated PC12 cells,
Takano et al26 described a very different action
of PAMP on Ca2+ influx: PAMP-[1-20]-amide
inhibited divalent cation inward currents through N-type
Ca2+ channels, and this inhibition could be
abolished by pretreatment with pertussis toxin, suggesting an action of
PAMP on a receptor utilizing a pertussis toxinsensitive G
protein.26 Therefore, we also examined whether
pertussis toxinsensitive G proteins mediate PAMP antisecretory
activity in either normal PC12 cells, which express mainly L-type
Ca2+ channels,43 or in
NGF-treated PC12 cells, which express N-type Ca2+
channels.43 The catecholamine
releaseinhibitory action of PAMP-[1-20]-amide was not
influenced by pertussis toxin in either normal (data not shown) or
NGF-treated (data not shown) PC12 cells. Thus, in this PC12 cell
system, the PAMP effect to inhibit catecholamine release
can be entirely accounted for by actions on the nicotinic receptor.
The inability of nicotine to overcome PAMP-[1-20]-amide secretory
inhibition even at very high agonist doses (Figure 2
) indicates
noncompetitive nicotinic inhibition, although we have not yet
established the precise site at which PAMP interacts with the nicotinic
receptor. In other studies, we recently identified a novel fragment of
chromogranin A, catestatin (bovine chromogranin
A344-364), which also behaves as a noncompetitive
nicotinic antagonist.44
To define the minimal active region within the PAMP sequence, we
synthesized PAMP analogues by N-terminal (PAMP-[4-20]-amide,
PAMP-[7-20]-amide, PAMP-[10-20]-amide, PAMP-[13-20]-amide,
PAMP-[16-20]-amide) or C-terminal (PAMP-[1-17], PAMP-[1-14],
PAMP-[1-11], PAMP-[1-8], PAMP-[1-5]) truncations. Although
truncation of even 3 C-terminal amino acids (PAMP-[1-17]) abolished
PAMP antisecretory activity, truncation from the N-terminus (up to 9
residues) failed to diminish the activity and even augmented its
potency (PAMP-[10-20]-amide; IC50
0.12
µmol/L); thus, residues crucial for PAMP activity reside toward its
C-terminus (Figures 3A
and B), while N-terminal residues 1 through 9
(ARLDVASEF) may actually be modestly inhibitory to the
overall nicotinic cholinergic actions of PAMP. Even the 8amino acid
peptide PAMP-[13-20]-amide (WNKWALSR-amide) retained substantial
potency (IC50
0.53 µmol/L; Figure 3A
).
The enhanced potency of PAMP-[10-20]-amide
(IC50
0.045 µmol/L; RKKWNKWALSR-amide;
Figure 5A
) may be of importance in vivo, since PAMP[9-20] has been
identified in the porcine adrenal medulla and exhibits a hypotensive
effect on intravenous injection in the
rat.7 In addition, the synthetic C-terminal PAMP
fragment PAMP-[12-20]-amide (KWNKWALSR-amide) is also a vasodepressor
in the rat and cat.8 Of note, the 12 functionally
crucial amino acids at the C-terminus of PAMP are completely conserved
in all mammalian species thus far studied (rat, pig, and human; Table 1
).
Two different lines of evidence (empirical statistical
algorithms33 34 and knowledge-based homology
modeling37) predicted an
-helical structure
for PAMP (Figure 8
). The antisecretory activity of PAMP is retained in
PAMP-[13-20] (WNKWALSR-amide; IC50
0.045 µmol/L; Figure 5
). Since each hydrogen-bonding turn of
an
-helix comprises
3.5 amino acid residues, it is conceivable
that an active
-helical conformation might not be sustainable with
<2 turns of helix, although peptides of up to 15 to 20 residues in
length are typically required for exhibition of a preference for
adopting stable helical structures in
solution.45
Both substance P42 and PAMP (Figure 7A
)
require C-terminal amidation for their effects, and each blocks
nicotinic desensitization of both catecholamine release
(Figure 7A
) and 22Na+
uptake (Figure 7B
). Both of these peptides are quite basic in amino
acid composition (PAMP-[1-20], pI
11.14; PAMP-[10-20], pI
12.49; substance P, pI
11.14), although they otherwise do not
share common primary structure (for substance P:
RPKPQQFFGLM-amide).
Proadrenomedullin fragments may have complex effects on blood
pressure. Even the vascular actions of adrenomedullin are multiple:
while adrenomedullin itself
(adrenomedullin152) is a vasodilator,
the adrenomedullin fragments adrenomedullin125,
adrenomedullin1621,
adrenomedullin1522, and
adrenomedullin1631 actually have pressor
effects, in species-specific fashion,22 and the
pressor effects are abrogated by sympatholytic maneuvers such as
-adrenergic blockade,46 47
catecholamine storage depletion,46 47
or adrenalectomy.46 Since the pressor effect of
adrenomedullin1522 is not abrogated by the
nicotinic cholinergic antagonist
hexamethonium,46 this response is
also unlikely to be influenced by the nicotinic antagonist
activity of PAMP (the present report).
In conclusion, PAMP not only inhibits nicotinic cholinergicstimulated
chromaffin cell catecholamine release but also antagonizes
the desensitization of catecholamine release induced by
nicotine. These 2 effects of PAMP are selective for the
physiological (nicotinic cholinergic agonist)
stimulus to chromaffin cell secretion. At the nicotinic receptor, the
inhibition is noncompetitive with agonist. The inhibition specifically
impairs nicotinic cationic (Ca2+ and
Na+) signal transduction. Since PAMP is
coreleased with catecholamines,23 it
may therefore contribute to a novel, autocrine homeostatic
(negative-feedback) mechanism controlling catecholamine
release from chromaffin cells (Figure 9
).
We speculate that PAMP blockade of nicotinic desensitization of
catecholamine release may be advantageous to an organism,
particularly during circumstances of heightened sympathetic outflow, a
setting in which this action of PAMP might sustain
catecholamine release.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 22, 1998; first decision May 18, 1998; accepted June 26, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||